Digital Rectal Exams Are Infrequently Performed Prior to Anorectal Manometry

BACKGROUND

Digital rectal examination should be performed prior to anorectal manometry; however, real-world data is lacking.

AIMS

Characterize real world rates of digital rectal and their sensitivity for detecting dyssynergia compared to anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted to examine all patients who underwent anorectal manometry for chronic constipation between 2021 and 2022 at one tertiary center with motility expertise. Primary outcomes consisted of the rate of digital rectal exam prior to anorectal manometry; and secondary outcomes included the sensitivity of digital rectal exam for dyssynergic defecation.

RESULTS

Only 42.3% of 142 patients had digital rectal examinations prior to anorectal manometry. Overall sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation was 46.4%, but significantly higher for gastroenterology providers (p = .004), and highest for gastroenterology attendings (82.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital rectal examination is infrequently performed when indicated for chronic constipation. Sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation may be impacted by discipline and level of training.

Obesity Is Associated with Altered Rectal Sensitivity in Chronic Constipation

BACKGROUND

Defecation dysfunction may contribute to chronic constipation (CC), but the impact of obesity on anorectal physiology in CC remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and anorectal function on physiologic testing in patients presenting with CC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults who underwent high resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) at a tertiary center for CC. Patient demographics, clinical history, surgical/obstetric history, medications, and HRAM results were reviewed. Patients were classified into obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) vs non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) groups at the time of HRAM. Fisher-exact/student t-test for univariate analyses and general linear regression for multivariable analysis were performed.

RESULTS

383 adults (mean 50.3 years; 85.8% female) with CC were included. On HRAM, patients with obesity had lower anal sphincter resting tone (37.3 vs 48.5 mmHg, p = 0.005) and maximum squeeze pressure (104.8 mmHg vs 120.0 mmHg, p = 0.043). No significant differences in dyssynergia (61% vs 53%, p = 0.294) and failed balloon expulsion (18% vs 25%, p = 0.381) were found between obese and non-obese groups. On balloon distention testing, the maximum tolerated (163.5 vs 147.6 mL, p = 0.042) and urge sensation (113.9 vs 103.7 mL, p = 0.048) volumes were significantly increased among patients with obesity. After adjusting for potential confounders, obesity remained independently associated with increased maximum tolerated volume (β-coefficient 13.7, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Obesity was independently associated with altered rectal sensitivity among patients with CC. Altered rectal sensation may play an important role in CC among patients with obesity. Anorectal physiology testing should be considered to understand the pathophysiology and guide management.

Long term persistence and risk factors for anorectal symptoms following low anterior resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer is commonly treated by chemoradiation therapy, followed by the low anterior resection anal sphincter-preserving surgery, with a temporary protecting ileostomy. After reversal of the stoma a condition known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) can occur characterized by a combination of symptoms such as urgent bowel movements, lack of control over bowel movements, and difficulty fully emptying the bowels. These symptoms have a significant negative impact on the quality of life for individuals who have survived the cancer. Currently, there is limited available data regarding the presence, risk factors, and effects of treatment for these symptoms during long-term follow-up.

AIMS

To evaluate long term outcomes of low anterior resection surgery and its correlation to baseline anorectal manometry (ARM) parameters and physiotherapy with anorectal biofeedback (BF) treatment.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients (74 males, age 63 ± 11) who underwent low anterior resection surgery for rectal cancer were included in the study. Following surgery, patients were managed by surgical and oncologic team, with more symptomatic LARS patients referred for further evaluation and treatment by gastroenterologists. At follow up, patients were contacted and offered participation in a long term follow up by answering symptom severity and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires.

RESULTS

80 (70%) patients agreed to participate in the long term follow up study (median 4 years from stoma reversal, range 1-8). Mean time from surgery to stoma closure was 6 ± 4 months. At long term follow up, mean LARS score was 30 (SD 11), with 55 (69%) patients classified as major LARS (score > 30). Presence of major LARS was associated with longer time from surgery to stoma reversal (6.8 vs. 4.8 months; p = 0.03) and with adjuvant chemotherapy (38% vs. 8%; p = 0.01). Patients initially referred for ARM and BF were more likely to suffer from major LARS at long term follow up (64% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients who underwent perioperative ARM (n = 36), higher maximal squeeze pressure, higher maximal incremental squeeze pressure and higher rectal pressure on push were all associated with better long-term outcomes of QOL parameters (p < 0.05 for all). 21(54%) of patients referred to ARM were treated with BF, but long term outcomes for these patients were not different from those who did not perform BF.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients continue to experience severe symptoms and a decline in their quality of life even 4 years after undergoing low anterior resection surgery. Prolonged time until stoma reversal and adjuvant chemotherapy emerged as the primary risk factors for a negative prognosis. It is important to note that referring patients for anorectal physiology testing alone tended to predict poorer long-term outcomes, indicating the presence of selection bias. However, certain measurable manometric parameters could potentially aid in identifying patients who are at a higher risk of experiencing unfavorable functional outcomes. There is a critical need to enhance current treatment options for this patient group.

High-resolution anorectal manometry for diagnosing obstructed defecation syndrome associated with moderate rectocele compared to healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated healthy female individuals (HFI) and those with obstructed defecation syndrome associated with moderate rectocele in women (MRW), identified using three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D HRAM) parameters that correlate with age stratification.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the clinical diagnostic values of the MRW and HFI groups using 3D HRAM parameters related to age stratification.

METHODS

A prospective non-randomized controlled trial involving 128 cases from the MRW (treatment group, 68 cases) and HFI (control group, 60 cases) groups was conducted using 3D HRAM parameters at Tianjin Union Medical Center between January 2017 and June 2022, and patients were divided into two subgroups based on their ages: the ≥50 and < 50 years subgroups.

RESULTS

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that age (P = 0.024) and rectoanal inhibitory reflex (P = 0.001) were independent factors affecting the disease in the MRW group. Compared to the HFI group, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that the 3D HRAM parameters exhibited a higher diagnostic value for age (Youden index = 0.31), urge to defecate (Youden index = 0.24), and rectoanal pressure differential (Youden index = 0.21) in the MRW group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the HFI group, the ROC curve of the 3D HRAM parameters suggests that age, urge to defecate, and rectoanal pressure differential in the MRW group have a significant diagnostic value. Because the Youden index is lower, 3D HRAM cannot be considered the gold standard method for diagnosing MRW.

Providing Trauma Informed Care During Anorectal Evaluation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with a history of gastrointestinal (GI) conditions report high rates of psychological trauma. This review discusses the impact of previous trauma, as well as interactions with the medical system, on a patient's physical and mental health. Trauma-informed strategies for improving patient care during gastroenterology procedures are provided.

RECENT FINDINGS

History of trauma increases risk of developing GI conditions and re-traumatization during sensitive anorectal procedures (i.e., anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion testing). Trauma-informed strategies include consistent trauma screening for all patients, obtaining consent before and during procedures, creating a safe environment, allowing for privacy, and post-procedure debriefing. Due to high rates of psychological trauma in the gastroenterology setting and the risk of medical trauma from the GI procedures themselves, having an established trauma-informed plan of care for all patients can reduce risk of iatrogenic harm and improve quality of care for patients with GI conditions.

Recto-anal Pressures in Constipated Men and Women Undergoing High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry

BACKGROUND

In constipated individuals, high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM) may suggest the presence of a defecatory disorder. Despite known physiological differences between men and women, our understanding of functional anorectal pathophysiology is based upon predominantly female cohorts. Results are generalized to men.

AIMS

To evaluate whether recto-anal pressure patterns in constipated men are similar to those in constipated women.

METHODS

The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were used to identify constipated adult patients, without organic anorectal disease, who had undergone HRM and balloon expulsion testing (BET) in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Comparative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among 3,298 constipated adult patients (2,633 women, 665 men), anal and rectal pressures were higher in men. Women more likely to have HRM findings suggestive of a defecatory disorder (39% versus 20%, P < 0.001). Women were more likely to exhibit a type 4 pattern (27% versus 14%, P < 0.001), and less likely to exhibit a type 1 pattern (14% versus 38%, P < 0.001), of dyssynergia. Men were more likely to have an abnormal balloon expulsion test (BET, 34% versus 29%, P = 0.006). Nominal logistic regression demonstrates that male sex, age over 50 years, reduced recto-anal gradient during simulated evacuation, and types 2 and 4 dyssynergia are associated with an abnormal BET.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective study, constipated men and women exhibited different patterns of dyssynergia both in the presence and absence of an abnormal BET. These findings were independent of sex-specific baseline physiological differences.

Anorectal manometry findings in relation with long-term functional outcomes of the patients operated on for Hirschsprung's disease compared to the reference-based population

PURPOSE

This study investigated anorectal manometry (AM) findings and bowel function of patients operated on for Hirschsprung's disease (HD).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Children's Hospital 2. Patients operated on for HD from January 2015 to January 2020 were reviewed. Their clinical characteristics, bowel function, and manometric findings were investigated and compared with the references.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients and 95 references were enrolled. Mean ages were 6.6 ± 2.2 years and 7.2 ± 2.9 years,; fecal incontinence rates were 25.3% and 2.1%, and constipation rates were 12.6% and 4.2 for the patients versus the references, respectively. Anal resting pressures were significantly decreased in the patients compared to the references (53.2 ± 16.1 mmHg versus 62.2 ± 14.0 mmHg; p < 0.05). Among the patients, the anal resting pressure was significantly decreased in the incontinents than in the continents (46.0 ± 10.6 mmHg versus 55.6 ± 16.9 mmHg, p < 0.05). During the sensation test, the value of maximum tolerated volume was significantly decreased in the incontinents than in the continents (135.9 ± 47.9 mL versus 166.6 ± 58.3 mL, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AM is an objective method providing beneficial information that could guide a more adapted management in HD patients with defecation disorders.

Anal canal and sphincter function in children with Hirschsprung disease after definitive surgery

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal manometry may be useful to objectively evaluate anorectal function following definitive pullthrough for Hirschsprung Disease (HD) but there is little published data. Our study aims to investigate anorectal manometry findings and their association with bowel function.

METHODOLOGY

This was a prospective observational study. Convenience sampling method was used to recruit all HD patients who had definitive pullthrough from January 2019 to December2020 in our institution. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) was used to record anal resting pressure (ARP), length of high-pressure zone (HPZ), and presence/absence of recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). The Paediatric Incontinence/Constipation Scoring System (PICSS) was scored for all participants. PICSS is a validated questionnaire with scores mapped to an age-specific normogram to denote constipation, incontinence, and their combinations. Non-parametric and chi-square tests at significance p<0.05 were conducted to examine the relationship between PICSS categories and manometry findings. Ethical approval was obtained.

RESULTS

There were 32 participants (30 boys). Median age at participation was 26.5 months (range: 13.8-156). Twenty-four (75%) had transanal pullthrough, 8(25%) underwent Duhamel procedure. PICSS scored 10(31.3%) as normal, 8(25%) as constipation, 10(31.3%) as incontinent, and 4(12.5%) as mixed. RAIR was present in 12 patients (37.5%). HPZ, maximum ARP, mean ARP were comparable across all PICSS groups without statistically significant differences. Presence of RAIR was not significantly associated with any PICSS groups (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Bowel function does not appear to be significantly associated with HRAM findings after definitive pullthrough for HD, but our study is limited by small sample size. RAIR was present in 37.5% patients after pullthrough.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Age- and Gender-Based Differences in Anorectal Function, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Constipation-Specific Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Constipation

BACKGROUND

The effect of age and gender differences on anorectal function, symptoms severity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic constipation (CC) is not well studied. This study examines the impact of age and gender on anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptoms burden, and QoL in patients with CC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2550 adults with CC who completed AFT. Collected data include demographics, sphincter response to simulated defecation during anorectal manometry (ARM), balloon expulsion testing (BET), and validated surveys assessing constipation symptoms and QoL. DD was defined as both the inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET.

RESULTS

2550 subjects were included in the analysis (mean age = 48.6 years). Most patients were female (81.6%) and Caucasian (82%). 73% were < 60 years old (mean = 41) vs. 27% ≥ 60 years old (mean = 69). The prevalence of impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, abnormal BET, and DD in patients with CC was 48%, 42.1%, and 22.9%, respectively. Patients who were older and male were significantly more frequently diagnosed with DD and more frequently had impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, compared to patients who were younger and female (p < 0.05). Conversely, CC patients who were younger and female reported greater constipation symptoms severity and more impaired QoL (p ≤ 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with CC referred for anorectal function testing, men and those older than 60 are more likely to have dyssynergic defecation, but women and patients younger than 60 experience worse constipation symptoms and QoL.

[Analysis of anorectal manometry data in central and peripheral neurological deseases: Review of the literature]

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral or central neurological deseases are providers of anorectal disorders of variable clinical expression (constipation, dyschezia, faecal incontinence (FI)…). Anorectal manometry (ARM) participates in their exploration to determine the underlying mechanisms, guide and optimize treatments. The objective of this work was to determine if there is a pattern of ARM data in neurological populations.

MATERIALS ET METHODS

Literature review from PubMed, Cochrane and Google scholar databases, using the following keywords: parkinsonian disorders; parkinson's disease; multiple slcerosis; neurolog*; spinal cord injury; spina bifida occulta; stroke; pudendal; endometriosis; peripheral nervous system diseases. 196 articles were isolated and finally 45 retained after reading the title and the abstract.

RESULTS

Data comparison was difficult due to the heterogeneity of techniques and thresholds used. In central lesions, resting and squeeze anal pressures were often altered. The presence of FI or constipation, the sex and the lesion level were factors influencing these data (low if complete injury, women or EDSS>5.5). In case of peripheral lesion, it is the anal tone and the contraction that varied the symptomatology. The sensory thresholds were variable regardless of the impairment.

CONCLUSION

This review did not identify a data pattern of ARM in central and peripheral neurological deseases. Gradual standardization of techniques and protocols will allow better comparison of data.

Utility of postoperative anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformation: a systematic review

Children with anorectal malformation (ARM) often continue to have disturbances in bowel function long after reconstructive surgery. Anorectal manometry may be utilized to evaluate bowel function in these children. We aimed to describe the reported protocols and manometric findings in children with ARM post-reconstructive surgery and to investigate the correlation between manometric evaluation and bowel functional outcome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched from 1980 to 2021. Data were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Included studies were English articles reporting postoperative assessment of children (≤ 18 years) with ARM using anorectal manometry. From 128 articles obtained in the initial search, five retrospective cohort studies and one prospective study fulfilled inclusion criteria. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex and mean anal resting pressure were parameters most often reported to correlate with postoperative bowel function. The least reported parameters among the studies were high-pressure zone, rectal volume, and rectal sensation. Anorectal manometry could be an objective method providing important information for personalized management of postoperative ARM patients with bowel function issues, but lack of standardized protocols limits a comprehensive analysis of their utility.

Opioid-Associated Anorectal Dysfunction in Chronic Constipation

INTRODUCTION

The role of anorectal and defecatory dysfunction in opioid-related constipation is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between opioid use and rectal sensation, defecatory function, and balloon expulsion on anorectal physiology testing.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) at a tertiary center for constipation. Clinical characteristics, medication use, and HRAM findings were obtained. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher-exact/student t-test for univariate analyses and logistic/general linear regression for multivariable analyses to compare patients with no opioid use, recent (< 3 months) use, and distant (> 3 months) use.

RESULTS

424 patients (49.8 ± 17.2 years; 85.6% female) were included. Compared to those without opioid history, patients with recent use had increased volumes for first rectal sensation (70.4 mL vs 59.4, p = 0.043), urge (120.5 mL vs 101.5, p = 0.017), and maximal tolerance (170.2 mL vs 147.2, p = 0.0018), but not patients with distant use. Recent opioid use was associated with increased risk of dyssynergic defecation (DD) (61.8% vs 46.4%, p = 0.035), but not failed balloon expulsion. On multivariable models controlling for potential confounders, recent opioid use, but not distant use, remained independently correlated with increased volumes for first rectal sensation (β-coefficient 9.78, p = 0.019), urge (β-coefficient 16.7, p = 0.0060), and maximal tolerance (β-coefficient 22.9, p = 0.0032), and higher risk for DD (aOR = 2.18, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Recent opioid use was an independent risk factor for rectal hyposensitivity and DD on HRAM in patients with constipation, but that effect may decrease with discontinuation of use. Anorectal physiology testing should be considered in patients with opioid-associated constipation.

Organizing and Developing a GI Motility Lab in Community Practice: Challenges and Rewards

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurogastroenterology and motility is a rapidly evolving subspecialty that encompasses over 33% of gastroenterological disorders, and up to 50% of referrals to gastroenterology practice. It includes common problems such as dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, gas/bloating, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, food intolerance and fecal incontinence Standard diagnostic tests such as endoscopy or imaging are normal in these conditions. To define the underlying mechanism(s)/etiology of these disorders, diagnostic motility tests are often required. These are best performed by well-trained personnel in a dedicated motility laboratory. Our purpose is to provide an up-to-date overview on how to organize and develop a motility laboratory based on our collective experiences in setting up such facilities in academia and community practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A lack of knowledge, training and facilities for providing diagnostic motility tests has led to suboptimal patient care. A motility laboratory is the hub for diagnostic and therapeutic motility procedures. Common procedures include esophageal function tests such as esophageal manometry and pH monitoring, anorectal function tests suchlike anorectal manometry, neurophysiology and balloon expulsion, dysbiosis and food intolerance tests such as hydrogen/methane breath tests, and gastrointestinal transit assessment. These tests provide an accurate diagnosis and guide clinical management including use of medications, biofeedback therapy, neuromodulation, behavioral therapies, evidence-based dietary interventions and endoscopic or surgical procedures. Further, there have been recent developments in billing and coding of motility procedures and training requirements that are not well known. This review provides a stepwise approach on how to set-up a motility laboratory in the community or academic practice and includes the rationale, infrastructure, staffing needs, commonly performed motility tests and their clinical utility, billing and coding strategies, training needs and economic considerations for setting up this service.

Comparison of Anorectal Function as Measured with High-Resolution and High-Definition Anorectal Manometry

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal manometry (ARM) provides comprehensive assessment of pressure activity in the rectum and anal canal. Absolute pressure values might depend on the catheter used.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the results obtained by different anorectal catheters in children with functional anorectal disorders.

METHODS

Children diagnosed with functional defecation disorders based on the Rome IV criteria were prospectively enrolled. ARM was performed in the supine position successively using 2 different probes in each patient in random order. Resting, squeeze pressures, and bear-down maneuver variables obtained by high-resolution (2-dimensional [2D]) and high-definition (3-dimensional [3D]) catheters were compared.

RESULTS

We prospectively included 100 children {mean age 7.5 [standard deviation (SD) ± 4.3] years; 62 boys}. Mean resting pressures were significantly higher when measured with the 3D than with the 2D catheter (71 [SD ± 19.4] vs. 65 [SD ± 20.1] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.000). Intrarectal pressure measured by 3D and 2D catheters was similar (35 vs. 39 mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.761), but the percent of anal relaxation appeared to be higher for the 3D than for the 2D probe (12 vs. 5%, respectively; p = 0.002). Dyssynergic defecation (DD) was diagnosed in 41/71 patients (57.7%) using the 3D probe and in 51/71 children (71.8%) using the 2D probe (p = 0.044). Cohen's kappa showed only fair agreement between the catheters (κ = 0.40) in diagnosis of DD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated significantly different values of pressures obtained with different types of catheters. Normal ranges for conventional manometry cannot be applied to high-resolution systems, and results obtained by different types of manometry cannot be compared without adjustments (NCT02812823).

Intra-abdominal pressure correlates with abdominal wall tension during clinical evaluation tests

BACKGROUND

The abdominal muscles play an important respiratory and stabilization role, and in coordination with other muscles regulate the intra-abdominal pressure stabilizing the spine. The evaluation of postural trunk muscle function is critical in clinical assessments of patients with musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. This study evaluates the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure measured as anorectal pressure with objective abdominal wall tension recorded by mechanical-pneumatic-electronic sensors.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional observational study, thirty-one asymptomatic participants (mean age = 26.77 ± 3.01 years) underwent testing to measure intra-abdominal pressure via anorectal manometry, along with abdominal wall tension measured by sensors attached to a trunk brace (DNS Brace). They were evaluated in five different standing postural-respiratory situations: resting breathing, Valsalva maneuver, Müller's maneuver, instructed breathing, loaded breathing when holding a dumbbell.

FINDINGS

Strong correlations were demonstrated between anorectal manometry and DNS Brace measurements in all scenarios; and DNS Brace values significantly predicted intra-abdominal pressure values for all scenarios: resting breathing (r = 0.735, r² = 0.541, p < 0.001), Valsalva maneuver (r = 0.836, r² = 0.699, p < 0.001), Müller's maneuver (r = 0.651, r² = 0.423, p < 0.001), instructed breathing (r = 0.708, r² = 0.501, p < 0.001), and loaded breathing (r = 0.921, r² = 0.848, p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Intra-abdominal pressure is strongly correlated with, and predicted by abdominal wall tension monitored above the inguinal ligament and in the area of superior trigonum lumbale. This study demonstrates that intra-abdominal pressure can be evaluated indirectly by monitoring the abdominal wall tension.

Comparing the fecal continence scores of patients with anorectal malformation with anorectal manometric findings

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM) may have defecation-related problems throughout their lives, even if they are perfect treated surgically. Assessment methods are needed to standardize the clinical outcomes of patients with ARM. The aim of this study was to compare the scoring systems (SS) with the anorectal manometry (AM) findings.

METHODS

The data of patients operated on for ARM were examined. Holschneider's, Rintala's, Krickenbeck's and Peña's questionnaires were executed to the patients and AM was performed.

RESULTS

Our study was completed with 23 patients. There was a statistically significant relationship between the anal resting pressure and Holschneider's questionnaire (HQ). There was a statistically significant relationship between the area under the curve in the maximum voluntary squeeze pressure-time graph (AUC) and the HQ and Rintala's questionnaire (RQ). A statistically significant difference was found between HQ and RQ scores and high type and low type of ARMs.

CONCLUSION

In our study, based on AM data, it was found that the use of HQ and RQ from the four SS we compared could be more effective in patients' follow-up. It was concluded that Peña's questionnaire and Krickenbeck's questionnaire should be used to determine the bowel management program of the patients rather than patients' follow-up.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam

BACKGROUND

High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) has been developed to improve measurement of anorectal functions. This study aims to identify normal HRAM values in healthy young Vietnamese adults.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study at the National Hospital of Traditional Medicine (Hanoi, Vietnam) from July through December 2014. Healthy young adults were invited to participate in the study. All anorectal measurement values were performed using the ISOLAB high-resolution manometry system. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

Thirty healthy young adults, including 15 males and 15 females aged 19-26 years, were recruited. Mean functional anal canal length was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm (range: 2.4-4.8 mm). Mean maximum resting pressure, mean maximum squeezing pressure, mean maximum coughing pressure, and mean maximum strain pressure were 65.5, 168.0, 125.9, and 84.2 mm Hg, respectively. All anal pressure values were significantly different between males and females. For rectal sensation measurements, only the volume at first sensation was significantly higher in males than in females.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides normal HRAM value for healthy young adults in Vietnam. Sex may influence anal pressure and first rectal sensation values in this cohort. Further studies should be conducted in order to improve the quality of HRAM normal values and to confirm the effects of sex.

Rectal Distension Increased the Rectoanal Gradient in Patients with Normal Rectal Sensory Function

BACKGROUND

Frequent observation of abnormal manometric patterns consistent with dyssynergia in healthy volunteers has warranted the need for reassessment of the current methods to enhance the diagnostic value of anorectal manometry in functional defecatory disorders. Whether rectal distention at simulated evacuation will affect anorectal pressure profile and increase rectoanal gradient is not known.

METHODS

One hundred and eight consecutive patients with chronic constipation, 93 females, median age 53 years (interquartile range: 40-65), were studied. Simulated evacuation was performed firstly with empty balloon and subsequently after balloon distention to 50 and 100 ml. Anorectal pressures were compared. We also performed subgroup analysis in relation to outcome of balloon expulsion test (BET). In addition, we studied the effect of rectal distension on the rectoanal pressure gradient with respect to rectal sensory function.

RESULTS

Rectal balloon distension at simulated evacuation improved rectoanal gradient and decreased the rate of dyssynergia during high-resolution anorectal manometry. In subgroup analysis, the increase in rectoanal gradient and correction of dyssynergia with rectal distension was limited to the patients who had normal BET and normal rectal sensory function. Rate of anal relaxation, residual anal pressures, and rectoanal gradient were significantly different between patients with and without normal BET at 50 ml of rectal distension. Rectoanal gradient recorded only after rectal distension, along with BMI and maximum tolerable volumes, could predict BET results independently in patients with chronic constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal distension during simulated evacuation will affect the anorectal pressure profile. Increase in rectoanal gradient and correction of dyssynergia was only significant in patients with normal rectal sensory function and normal BET.

Sampling reflex: pathogenic role in functional defecation disorder

BACKGROUND

The sampling reflex is necessary to begin defecation or flatulence. It consists of a simultaneous rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) mediated by relaxation of the internal anal sphincter and rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER) mediated by contraction of the external anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sampling reflex in patients with functional defecation disorder (FDD).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 58 obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) patients with FDD. All 58 patients and 20 controls were evaluated with anorectal manometry to study the sampling reflex. Quantitative RAIR (total duration of reflex; maximal amplitude of relaxation; residual pressure at the lowest point of the RAIR) and RAER data (maximal amplitude of contraction; duration) were obtained. The straining test on manometry was considered positive for FDD if there was a muscle contraction/lack of relaxation or an insufficient pressure gradient for the passage of feces. Defecography was performed on all the patients with assessment of the anorectal angle and persistence or increase of puborectalis indentation.

RESULTS

Fifty (86.2%) FDD patients had an altered sampling reflex, showing incomplete/short duration of RAIR and excessive contraction/duration of RAER. More specifically, there was a correlation between a positive straining test and a short total duration of RAIR (ρ 0.92) as well as with excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.89). There was also a correlation between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and short total duration of RAIR ((ρ 0.79) and between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.83). Altered maximal amplitude relaxation had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAIR (87.9) while maximal amplitude contraction had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAER (89.6). High residual pressure at the lowest point of RAIR had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAIR (80.0) while RAER duration had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAER (77.7).

CONCLUSION

The sampling reflex is impaired in patients with FDD. This finding provides an important insight into the pathogenesis of obstructed functional defecation.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in 102 patients: Do different phenotypes make sense?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the pathophysiological mechanisms of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS).

AIMS

We aim to identify the different phenotypes, taking into account complaints, anatomy and anorectal physiology.

METHODS

Complaints, endoscopy results, and physiology data of patients with histologically proven SRUS were collected and analysed. The associated anorectal diseases were faecal incontinence and obstructed defecation. The clinical aspects of SRUS were compared, and factors associated with anorectal diseases were identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 102 consecutive patients were included. The predominant lesion was a rectal ulcer (66%), and inflammation of the rectal wall was present in 42% of patients. Abnormal rectal capacities and/or rectal perception was observed in more than half. Nearly half (52%) of the patients met the criteria for obstructed defecation and they tended to more frequently have psychiatric disease (66.7% vs 33.3%; p=0.07). Patients with faecal incontinence (17%) reported more self-perception of anal procidentia (p=0.01) and were more likely to have inflammation of the rectal wall (p=0.02), high-grade internal rectal procidentia (p=0.06) and anal hypotonia (p=0.004); their maximum tolerable volume was lower (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of patients with SRUS suggest different phenotypes. This may be a way to develop a comprehensive treatment strategy.

Comparison of longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry between children with anoretal malformations and functional constipation

BACKGROUND

Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence (FI) in children with anorectal malformations (AM) is not well understood. Standard or high-resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) does not identify radial asymmetry or localize abnormal sphincter function. 3D high-definition anorectal manometry (HDARM) provides detailed topographic and 3D pressure gradient representation of anal canal.

AIMS

To compare intra-anal pressure profiles between children with AM and controls using HDARM and to determine the association between manometric properties and reported predictors of fecal continence (AM type, spinal anomaly, and sacral integrity).

METHODS

HDARM tracings of 30 children with AM and FI referred for ARM were compared with 30 age and sex-matched children with constipation. 2D pressure profiles were used to measure length of high-pressure zone (HPZ). Longitudinal and radial measurements of sphincter pressure at rest and squeeze were taken along each segment in 3D topographic views and compared between groups.

KEY RESULTS

3D measurements demonstrated longitudinal and radial differences between groups along all quadrants of HPZ. At rest, intra-anal pressures were lower along the four segments longitudinally across the anal canal and radially along the quadrants in AM group (P < .01). At squeeze, all quadrant pressures were lower in segments 1-4 in AM group (P < .01). Sensation was abnormal in AM group (P < .01). Intra-anal pressures longitudinally and radially were not associated with predictors of fecal continence.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Children with AM had abnormal sensation and lower pressures longitudinally and radially along all quadrants of anal canal. Manometric properties at rest were not associated with reported predictors of fecal continence.

A Case-Based Approach to Constipation in Primary Care

Primary care physicians frequently evaluate patients with constipation. The history is crucial in uncovering warning symptoms and signs that warrant colonoscopy. Particular elements in the history and rectal examination also can provide clues regarding the underlying etiology. Regardless of etiology, lifestyle modifications, fiber, and laxatives are first-line therapies. Patients who fail first-line therapies can be offered second-line treatments and/or referred for testing of defecatory function. In those with severely refractory symptoms, referrals to a gastroenterologist and a surgeon should be considered.

Clinical, Physiological, and Psychological Correlates of the Improvement of Defecation during Menses in Women with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Little is known about the improvement in defecation frequently reported by women around menses. We aimed to describe clinical, physiological, and psychological correlates of this improvement in those with functional bowel disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 478 consecutive premenopausal adult females with no indication of gynecologic or psychiatric disease, who were attending an outpatient functional bowel disorders clinic. Patients completed a Rome III questionnaire, psychological evaluation stool form, and a 10-point Likert scale for constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain. These patients underwent physiological tests, anorectal manometry, and colonic transit time and were classified according to the presence or the absence of improvement in defecation during menses. The reverse selection procedure was used for model selection during multivariate logistic regression where statistically significant variables (p < 0.01) remained in the adjusted model.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (20%) reported easier defecation during menstruation. These patients were younger (p < 0.001) but had similar body mass indices and psychological profiles as the other patients. Clinically, they only reported more frequent irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation (p = 0.007), with harder stools (p = 0.005) and delayed left colon transit time (p = 0.002). No anorectal manometric parameter was different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of constipation during menses is mainly associated with younger age and constipation-IBS phenotype and not with functional constipation.

Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma

PURPOSE

A diverting stoma is created to prevent anastomotic leakage and related complications impairing sphincteric function in rectal surgery. However, diverting stoma may be left unclosed. This study is aimed to analyze preoperative factors including anorectal manometric data associated with diverting stoma non-reversal before rectal surgery. We also addressed complications related to diverting stoma in patients undergoing surgery for rectal malignant tumor.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients with rectal malignant tumor who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery with diverting stoma were retrospectively evaluated. The risk factors for non-reversal of diverting stoma were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. For these analyses, anorectal manometric data were measured before rectal surgery. The association between stoma-related complications and other clinicopathological features was also analyzed.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 46.4 months, 24% (49 patients) did not undergo stoma reversal. Among parameters that were available before rectal surgery, age ≥ 75 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dl, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, tumor distance from the anal verge < 4 cm, and maximum squeezing pressure (MSP) < 130 mmHg measured by anorectal manometry (ARM) were independent factors associated with stoma non-reversal. The most common stoma-related complication was peristomal skin irritation (25%). Ileostomy was the only factor associated with peristomal skin irritation.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that low preoperative MSP evaluated by ARM, old age, hypoalbuminemia, and a large tumor close to the anus were predictive of diverting stoma non-reversal. Stoma site should be well deliberated when patients have the aforementioned risk factors for diverting stoma non-reversal.

The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Objective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Regrettably, the utility of the most established and widely employed investigations for such measurement (anorectal manometry (ARM), rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test) has been limited by wide variations in clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes the recently published International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) consensus and London Classification of anorectal disorders, together with relevant allied literature, to provide guidance on the indications for, equipment, protocol, measurement definitions and results interpretation for ARM, rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test. The London Classification is a standardized method and nomenclature for description of alterations in anorectal motor and sensory function using office-based investigations, adoption of which should bring much needed harmonization of practice.

A prospective study of anal symptoms and continence among obese patients before and after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The effects of bariatric surgery on anal continence are not known. Data about proctologic lesions are very rare and do not include clinical data. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate anal continence and anal lesions before and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

METHODS

We prospectively included all patients presenting for bariatric surgery consultation at Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France, between 20 April 2015 and 16 December 2017. The patients were evaluated with questionnaires, anorectal manometry and clinical examination before SG (at enrollment) and between 12 and 24 months after (SG). Anal incontinence was defined as a Vaizey score above 4.

RESULTS

Of 118 enrolled patients, 98 had SG. The patients were mostly women (n = 99, 84.6%). Median patient age was 45 years (IQR 34-54 years). The median follow-up period after surgery among the 86 patients who completed follow-up was 15 months (IQR 12.5-17.3 months). There was no significant change in the prevalence of anal incontinence after SG (12.8% preoperatively vs 24.4% postoperatively, p = 0.06). The median Vaizey score was 4 (IQR 4-4) both before and after SG (p = 0.1). No patient had de novo anal incontinence but worsening of anal incontinence was noted in 10 patients. Manometry revealed significantly lower median resting pressure (29 mmHg [IQR 22-68 mmHg] vs 22 mmHg [IQR 15-30 mmHg], p = 0.0015) and maximal squeeze pressure (IQR 29-74 mmHg vs IQR 30-60 mmHg, p = 0.0008) after SG. Anismus was more frequent after SG and was associated with constipation and Bristol type 1-2 stool consistency. Quality of life was unchanged. Proctologic lesions were rare and were present in 11 patients (12%) at enrollment and in 2 (2.4%) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SG affected clinical anal continence but not significantly, and manometric measurements for anal pressures were lower postoperatively. Proctologic lesions were rare in this study population.

[Anal tone: Physiology, clinical and instrumental characteristics]

INTRODUCTION

The anal tone allows the maintenance of anorectal continence. Its regulation depends on spinal segmental mechanisms under supra-sacral control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed using Medline database, according to PRISMA methodology, using following keywords anal tone ; anal sphincter ; anorectal function ; reflex ; digital rectal examination.

RESULTS

Anal hypertonia is an increase in the muscle's resistance to passive stretching. Muscular hypotonia is a decrease in muscle tone. It is associated with a decrease in resistance to passive mobilization. It is not possible to quantify the prevalence of anal tone alterations in the general population and in specific pathological conditions (urinary disorders, neurogenic or non-neurogenic anorectal disorders). In case of hypotonia, most often due to a lower motor neuron lesion, fecal incontinence may occur. Hypertonia (anal sphincter overactivity) is not always due to perineal spasticity. Indeed, in the majority of the cases, the cause of this anal hypertonia in a neurologic context, can be secondary to an upper motor neuron disease due to spinal or encephalic lesion, leading to recto-anal dyssynergia, giving distal constipation. In another way, this anal hypertonia can be purely behavioral, with no direct pathological significance. The evaluation of anal tone is clinical with validated scores but whose sensitivity is not absolute, and instrumental with, on the one hand, the measurement of anal pressure in manometry and, on the other hand, electrophysiological testing which still require validation in this indication.

CONCLUSION

Anal tone assessment is of interest in clinical practice because it gives diagnostic arguments for the neurological lesion and its level, in the presence of urinary or anorectal symptoms.

Improvement of Patient Satisfaction and Anorectal Manometry Parameters After Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Different Types of Dyssynergic Defecation

Biofeedback is a well-known and effective treatment for patients with fecal evacuation disorder (FED). The main purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome and the effects of biofeedback therapy on physiological parameters as assessed by manometry in patients with FED. Data from 114 consecutive patients with FED who underwent biofeedback therapy in Sara Gastrointestinal clinic in Tehran, Iran during 2015-2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All participants underwent a comprehensive evaluation of anorectal function that included anorectal manometry and a balloon expulsion test at the baseline and after biofeedback therapy. Maximum anal squeeze pressure and sustained anal squeeze pressure were improved up to 100% and 94.7% of normal values in the patients after biofeedback, respectively (P < 0.001). First rectal sensation, was significantly decreased (25 ± 18.5 vs. 15.5 ± 5.2) while the maximum tolerable volume was significantly increased (233.6 ± 89.7 vs. 182.4 ± 23.1) after biofeedback therapy (P < 0.001). Type I dyssynergia was the most common type, effecting 82 cases (71.9%) of our patients. Dyssynergia parameters were improved 50-80% in 34 (41.5%) and 10 (31.3%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. Over 80% improvement of dyssynergia parameters occurred in 48 (58.5%) and 22 (68.8%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.3). In addition, the ability to reject the balloon was significantly better in post intervention measurements (P < 0.001). Biofeedback not only improves the symptoms in patients of FED but also reverses more than 80% the dyssynergic parameters of defecation. However, due to the general effectiveness of biofeedback treatment in different types of DD, there were no significant differences between their improvement scores.

Outcome of anal symptoms and anorectal function following two obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-a nested case-controlled study

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant risk factor for developing anal incontinence. It can therefore be hypothesised that recurrent OASI in a subsequent delivery may predispose women to further anal sphincter dysfunction.

Methods

A nested case-controlled study based on data collected prospectively between 2006 and 2019. Women matched for age and ethnicity, with a history of one OASI and no sphincter damage in a subsequent delivery (control) were compared to women sustaining a second OASI. Assessment was carried out using the St Mark’s score (SMIS), anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound scan (findings quantified using the modified Starck score).

Results

Eighty-four women were included and equally distributed between the two groups, who were followed up 12 weeks postnatally. No difference in SMIS scores was found. Maximum resting pressure (MRP, mmHg) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP, mmHg) were significantly reduced in the study group. Median (IQR) MRP in the study group was 40.0 (31.3–54.0) versus 46.0 (39.3–61.5) in the control group (p = 0.030). Median (IQR) MSP was 73.0 (58.3–93.5) in the study group versus 92.5 (70.5–110.8) (p = 0.006) in the control group. A significant difference (p = 0.002) was found in the modified Starck score between the study group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–6.0]) and control group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–0.0]).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that women with recurrent OASI do not have significant anorectal symptoms compared to those with one OASI 12 weeks after delivery, but worse anal sphincter function and integrity. Therefore, on long-term follow-up, symptoms may possibly develop. This information will be useful when counselling women in a subsequent pregnancy.

Management of subsequent pregnancies following fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

OBJECTIVES

The management of subsequent pregnancy in women who sustained OASIS remains an enigma. Nearly all studies include all grades of OASIS including fourth-degree tears. In addition, most protocols require endoanal ultrasound and anal manometric assessment to provide advice regarding mode of delivery. In reality, most women who sustain an OASI do not undergo these investigations. The aims of our study were firstly to evaluate outcomes of fourth-degree OASIS in terms of sphincter defects, anal manometry and anal incontinence symptoms. Secondly, we wished to review recommendations made regarding subsequent mode of delivery after fourth-degree OASIS according to different published protocols.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational study of all women who had undergone a primary repair of a fourth-degree tear and seen in the perineal clinic of a tertiary urogynaecology unit between January 2006 and December 2017. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were performed on all women, and symptoms assessed using the validated modified St Mark's Score for anal incontinence. Diagnostic test accuracy analysis was performed for use of symptoms in predicting abnormal investigations.

RESULTS

74 fourth-degree tears were identified (mean follow-up 5.9 months; SD 11.5). Endoanal scan showed an internal anal sphincter defect in 77 % and an external anal sphincter defect in 49 %. Only 18 % had no defect. The mean incremental pressure rise was 12.6 mmHg (SD 15.5). 61 % were asymptomatic with a mean St Mark's Score of 3.8 (SD 5.4). The presence of symptoms alone had poor accuracy in predicting abnormal investigations. Based on Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidance, only 7% would not be offered a caesarean section as they are asymptomatic women with normal scan and manometry findings and would be counselled for a vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that only a few units offer these specialist investigations to their OASI population, it would be reasonable to offer caesarean section to all women who have sustained a fourth-degree tear. However, in centres where endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry are available, individualised counselling can be offered.

Functional constipation or redundancy of the colon?

OBJECTIVES

Constipation is a common problem in children, and most of the time, the cause is defined as functional. Our hypothesis is that children with functional refractory constipation had anatomic alterations of the colon.

METHODS

All children with chronic refractory constipation who visited our centre underwent accurate clinical examination, contrast enema (CE), anorectal manometry (ARM) and rectal suction biopsies (RSB). In case of functional constipation, three operators measured the size of the colon using radiograms and calculated the ratio based on the width of the second lumbar vertebra. The measurements carried out were compared with those reported in the literature on patients of the same age without constipation.

RESULTS

Over a period of 24 months, 69 patients with chronic refractory constipation, aged between 1 and 14 years, visited our department. A CE was performed on 67, and 2 were excluded because of anal stenosis. Sixty-five underwent anorectal manometry. Rectal suction biopsies were needed in 14 children, and 2 of them were found to have colonic aganglionosis. After a complete evaluation, 57 (82.61%) patients were diagnosed having functional constipation. By comparing the data of the patients with those of normal children reported by the other authors, we found that none of the measurements was statistically significant except for the rectosigmoid length: the mean value in one-year-old patients was 19.03 vs. 9.75, and in older children, it was 19.46 vs. 9.59.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing an anatomic anomaly in patients suffering from functional constipation is important for specific treatment, especially when the ratio (rectosigmoid length/L2) is higher than 15.

Anorectal Manometry Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as a Predictor of Maximal Treatment for Fecal Incontinence

PURPOSE

This study aims to establish the ability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2015, PROMs data, including the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Wexner Incontinence Score and ARM results, were prospectively collected from 276 patients presenting with FI. Spearman rank was used to assess correlations between specific PROMs questions and ARM assessments of sphincter motor function. Binomial regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of the need for surgery. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to establish the utility of individual ARM and PROMs variables in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with FI.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight patients (82.60%) were treated conservatively while 48 (17.39%) underwent surgery. On univariate analyses, all 4 domains of the BBUSQ, all 8 domains of the SF-36, and the Wexner Incontinence Score were significant predictors of surgery. Additionally, maximum resting pressure, 5-second squeeze endurance, threshold volume, and urge volume were significant. On ROC curve analyses, the only significant ARM measurement was the 5-second squeeze endurance. PROMs, such as the incontinence domain of the BBUSQ and five of the SF-36 domains, were identified as fair discriminators of the need for surgery.

CONCLUSION

PROMs are reliable predictors of maximal treatment in patients with FI and can be readily used in primary care to aid surgical referrals and can be applied in hospital settings as an aid to guide surgical treatment decisions.

[Long-term efficacy analysis of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for high and middle imperforate anus]

Objective: To explore the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty and conventional anorectoplasty in the treatment of children with high and middle anal atresia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) children with high and middle anal atresia; (2) complicated with rectourethral or rectovesical fistula; (3) complete follow-up data. Exclusion criteria: (1) complicated with 21-trisomy; (2) cerebral palsy and other mentaldisabilities; (3) Currarino syndrome; (4) FG syndrome. Clinical data of 88 patients with middle and high anal atresia, who complicated with rectourethral fistula or rectovesical fistula, and underwent anoplasty at Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2009 to June 2014 were enrolled in the study and analyzed. There were 24 cases with middle atresia and 64 cases with high atresia. All the cases were divided into 2 groups based on the operative method: laparoscopic group (laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty, 49 cases), pena group (posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, 39 cases). The demographic features of two groups were comparable. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass, classification of anomaly types and sacral ratio (all P>0.05). Student t test and Chi square tests were used to compare the surgical conditions (operative time, postoperative hospital stay and complications), anal function (Kelly score), constipation (Krickenbeck constipation score) and anorectal pressure. Results: Children of both groups all completed operation ssuccessfully. There were no statistically significant differences between laparoscopic group and pena group in the operative time [(120±31) minutes vs. (112±23) minutes, t=1.343, P=0.091] and postoperative hospital stay [(7.1±2.3) days vs. (10.7±3.3) days, t=6.021, P=1.000]. Complications were more common in the pena group [16.3% (8/49) vs. 35.9% (14/39), χ(2)=4.436, P=0.035]. The main complications in laparoscopic group were anal prolapse (8.2%, 4/49) and anal stenosis (6.2%, 3/49), while in pena group were anal stenosis (12.8%, 5/39) and perioperative perianal skin erosion (10.3%, 4/39). As for the anal function, the degree of feces, defecation control and sphincter contractility, the single scoring differences of Kelly scoring system were not statistically significant between the two groups, but the proportion of good function in the laparoscopic group was higher than that in the pena group [67.3% (8/49) vs. 38.5% (15/39), χ(2)=7.308, P=0.007]. Constipation occurred in 6 (12.2%) patients in the laparoscopic group, of whom 5 were improved by diet regulation and 1 required laxatives, while 9 (23.1%) patients developed constipation in the pena group, of whom 4 were improved by diet regulation and 5 required long-term laxatives. The difference of constipation ratio was not statistically significant (χ(2)=1.802, P=0.180). There were no cases of Krickenbeck constipation grade 3. Compared to the pena group, the laparoscopic group had higher anal resting pressure [(33.35±9.69) mmHg vs. (27.68±10.74) mmHg, t=2.599, P=0.011], higher dilating pressure [(9.00±5.61) mmHg vs.(6.51±3.24) mmHg, t=2.462, P=0.016], higher maximal squeeze pressure [(65.80±17.23) mmHg vs. (56.74±18.93) mmHg, t=2.389, P=0.019] and longer maximal contraction time [(21.16±5.02) seconds vs. (18.44±7.24) seconds, t=2.079, P=0.041]. The rectal resting pressure [(5.36±3.00) mmHg vs. (4.61±3.93) mmHg, t=1.015, P=0.312] was not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: Compared with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in the treatment of high and middle anal atresia has better long-term efficacy with less perioperative complications.

Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Very low anterior resection (VLAR) is performed widely, but some patients are left with fecal incontinence (FI), which compromises their quality of life (QOL) severely. This study sought to identify the predictive factors of postoperative FI after VLAR, which remain unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the anorectal manometry data of patients who underwent VLAR to identify the risk factors for postoperative FI among the various clinicopathological factors and manometric characteristics. FI and QOL were analyzed using the Wexner score and EORTC QLQ-C30, respectively.

RESULTS

The subjects of this study were 40 patients who underwent VLAR for low rectal cancer between April, 2015 and May, 2018. There were 11 (27%) patients in the major-FI group and 29 (73%) in the minor-FI group. Multivariate analysis revealed that low preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure (iMSP) was an independent risk factor for postoperative major-FI. Postoperative QOL tended to be worse in the major-FI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative low iMSP increases the risk of major-FI and impaired QOL after VLAR. This highlights the importance of performing preoperative anorectal manometry to evaluate the patient's anal function as well as to select the most appropriate operative procedure and early multifaceted treatment such as medication, rehabilitation, and biofeedback for postoperative FI.

Anorectal manometry in children with retentive fecal incontinence: What parameters should we evaluate?

INTRODUCTION

Children with functional constipation frequently present with alterations in rectal compliance and the urge-to-defecate sensation that can be evaluated through anorectal manometry (ARM). In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of the parameters obtained through ARM in children with retentive fecal incontinence (RFI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children with functional constipation, aged 4 to 17years, that underwent ARM were included in the study.

RESULTS

Of the 35 children evaluated, 21 presented with functional constipation and 14 had functional constipation and RFI. The children with both constipation and RFI tolerated greater volumes of air insufflation for triggering the urge to defecate and reaching maximum tolerance of pain, compared with the children that did not have RFI. We identified the cutoff point of 135ml of air as the maximum tolerance sensation for distinguishing children with RFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum tolerance of pain was the most useful parameter for evaluating RFI in children with functional constipation.

Clinical and anorectal manometry profile of patients with functional constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Functional constipation (FC) and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) have significant healthcare impact. Clinical and investigative data of patients with these disorders in Indian population is scarce. We aimed to compare the clinical and anorectal manometric profile of patients with FC and IBS-C.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with chronic constipation undergoing anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) were enrolled. Thirty healthy volunteers served as controls (HC). Functional defecatory disorder (FDD) was diagnosed according to ROME IV criteria if both ARM and BET were abnormal.

RESULTS

Of the 231 patients enrolled (median age 47 years, 87.8% males), FC and IBS-C were diagnosed in 132 (57.1%) and 99 (42.9%) patients, respectively. Significant clinical differences between FC and IBS-C patients included older age, lower stool frequency/week, higher frequency of straining, and greater frequency  of incomplete evacuation (p < 0.001). ARM revealed abnormal defecatory pattern in 55.3% (n = 73) FC patients and 47.5% (n = 47) IBS-C patients. Of them, 54.7% (40/73) of FC patients had inadequate defecatory propulsion while 89.4% (42/47) of the IBS-C patients had dyssynergic defecation (p < 0.001). Abnormal BET was seen in 67.4% of FC patients and 43.4% of IBS-C patients. Thus, FDD was diagnosed in 55.3% and 46.5% of FC and IBS-C patients, respectively. Rectal hyposensitivity was present in 60.6% of FC patients compared with 2% of IBS-C patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in clinical and manometric profile of FC and IBS-C patients. Compared with IBS-C patients, FC patients were older, had higher prevalence of FDD, less often had dyssynergic defecation, and had higher prevalence of rectal hyposensitivity.

Resting vector volume measured before ileostomy reversal may be a predictor of major fecal incontinence in patients with mid or low rectal cancer: a longitudinal cohort study using a prospective clinical database

PURPOSE

Despite a high incidence of fecal incontinence following sphincter-preservation surgery (SPS), there are no definitive factors measured before ileostomy reversal that predict fecal incontinence. We investigated whether vector volume anorectal manometry before ileostomy reversal predicts major fecal incontinence following SPS in patients with mid or low rectal cancer.

METHODS

This longitudinal prospective cohort study comprised 173 patients who underwent vector volume anorectal manometry before ileostomy reversal. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was measured 1 year after the primary SPS and classified as major incontinence (FISI score ≥ 25) or continent/minor incontinence (FISI score < 25). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of major incontinence.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (53.1%) had major incontinence. Although tumor stage, location, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were comparable, the major incontinence group had lower resting pressure (28.4 vs. 34.3 mmHg, P = 0.027), greater asymmetry at rest (39.1% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.002) and squeezing (34.2% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.046), shorter sphincter length (3.3 vs. 3.7 cm, P = 0.034), and lower resting vector volume (143,601 vs. 278,922 mmHg² mm, P < 0.001) compared with the continent/minor incontinence group. Resting vector volume was the only independent predictor of major incontinence (odds ratio = 0.675 per 100,000 mmHg² mm, 95% confidence interval, 0.532-0.823; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that resting vector volume before ileostomy reversal may predict major fecal incontinence. We suggest that the physiology of the anorectum should be discussed with patients before ileostomy reversal in patients at high risk of fecal incontinence.

Results of rectoanal manometry after a novel laparoscopic technique: laparoscope-assisted heart-shaped anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease

PURPOSE

The present research utilizes a mid-term follow-up study to assess the results of anorectal manometry after laparoscope-assisted heart-shaped anastomosis (LHSA) for Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR), and compares it to a more generally applied approach, the laparoscope-assisted Soave procedure (LSP).

METHODS

Retrospectively, patients from January 2015 to June 2017 who received LHSA or LSP were included in this study. After surgery, anorectal manometry was performed by the outpatient department. Anal sphincter resting pressure, anal canal length, amplitude of anal contraction, and frequency of anal contraction pre- and postoperatively were recorded. Additionally, mid-term complications were also monitored.

RESULTS

Preoperative manometry showed no statistically significant difference between the LHSA and LSP groups. Postoperatively, anal sphincter resting pressure was lower in the LHSA group (60.64 ± 9.33 vs. 68.84 ± 11.80 mmHg, p = 0.001). Furthermore, anal canal length of the LHSA group was shorter than that of the LSP group (1.41 ± 0.18 vs. 1.53 ± 0.25 cm, p = 0.015). Frequency of anal contraction also showed a statistically significant difference between the LHSA and LSP groups (13.53 ± 2.17 vs. 12.50 ± 2.03 per minute, p = 0.032). The complication rates showed no significant difference and were as follows: incidence of enterocolitis was 13.89% in the LHSA group and 20.45% in the LSP group, incidence of constipation was 11.11% after LHSA and 27.27% after LSP, and incidence of soiling was 13.89% after LHSA and 25.00% after LSP.

CONCLUSIONS

Manometric results of this study show satisfactory outcomes after LHSA. LHSA is an advanced surgical technique to make intestinal anastomosis easy and ensure a good prognosis.

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry can predict response to biofeedback therapy in defecation disorders

PURPOSE

Biofeedback therapy (BT) is a simple and effective technique for managing outlet constipation and fecal incontinence. Several clinical factors are known to predict BT response, but a 50% failure rate persists. Better selection of BT responsive patients is required. We aimed to determine whether the defecation disorder type per high-resolution manometry (HRM) was predictive of BT response.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical, manometric, and ultrasound endoscopic data from patients who underwent BT in our department between January 2015 and January 2016. Patients were classified into four groups per the following defecation disorder classification criteria: rectal pressure > 40 mmHg and anal paradoxical contraction (type I); rectal pressure < 40 mmHg and anal paradoxical contraction (type II); rectal pressure > 40 mmHg and incomplete anal relaxation (type III); and rectal pressure < 40 mmHg and incomplete anal relaxation (type IV). An experienced single operator conducted ten weekly 20-min sessions. Efficacy was evaluated with the visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Of 92 patients, 47 (50.5%) responded to BT. Type IV and type II defecation disorders were predictive of success (p = 0.03) (OR = 5.03 [1.02; 24.92]) and failure (p = 0.05) (OR = 0.41 [0.17; 0.99]), respectively. The KESS score severity before BT (p = 0.03) (OR = 0.9 [0.81; 0.99]) was also predictive of failure.

CONCLUSION

The manometry types identified according to the defecation disorder classification criteria were predictive of BT response. Our data confirm the role of three-dimensional HRM in the therapeutic management of anorectal functional disorders.

[Morphological characteristic of anal canal in patients with dyssynergic defecation and its correlation with anorectal manometry]

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) for dyssynergic defecation (DD). Methods: A case-control study was performed to retrospectively collectclinical data of 46 DD patients, including 16 males and 30 females with median age of 51 (20 to 70) years, at Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine from February 2012 to April 2015.All the patients met the diagnostic criteria of functional constipation of Rome III. The paradoxical contraction of puborectalis (PR) muscle was found by both rectal examination and anorectal manometry. In the same period,45 healthy volunteers, including 22 males and 23 females with median age of 48 (21 to 72) years, without pelvic operation history, and with normal defecation in recent 6 months, were enrolled as the control group. No significant differences were observed in age and gender between two groups (both P>0.05). Cleveland constipation score of DD group was higher than that of control group [15(8-24) vs. 5(1-9), t=15.720, P<0.001]. 3D-EAUS examination was performed in all the subjects. Thickness and length of internal anal sphincter (IAS) (anterior side and posterior side), thickness of PR muscle, length of external anal sphincter (EAS) plus PR muscle, and puborectalis angle were measured and compared by using student t test between two groups. Correlation between these ultrasound parameters and anorectal manometry was examined by Pearson correlation analysis. Results: Both male and female in the DD group had the greater thickness of IAS, as compared to those in the control group [male: (1.7±0.5) mm vs.(1.5±0.2) mm, t=2.516, P=0.016; female: (1.9±0.4) mm vs.(1.6±0.5) mm, t=2.034,P=0.047]. No significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to the posterior length of IAS, length of EAS plus PR muscle, and thickness of PR muscle (all P>0.05). Compared to the control group, male in the DD group had smaller puborectalis angle during straining [(87.0±3.6)° vs. (90.5±1.8)°,t=3.502,P=0.002];female in the DD group had smaller puborectalis angle both in resting and straining [resting:(86.5±3.8)° vs. (90.1±2.1)°,t=4.047, P<0.001;straining: (84.1±4.5)° vs. (90.2±2.3)°, t=5.938, P<0.001]. Correlation analysis showed that anterior length of IAS was positively correlated with anal resting pressure (r=0.321, P=0.030); the length of EAS plus PR muscle was positively correlated with anal squeeze pressure (r=0.415, P=0.004). There were no correlations between the thickness and the posterior length of IAS and the anal resting pressure, or between the thickness of PR muscle and the anal squeeze pressure (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The 3D-EAUS can accurately assess the morphological features of anal canal in DD patients. There is a certain positive correlation between 3D-EAUS and anorectal manometry.

Normal Rectal Filling Sensations in Patients with an Enlarged Rectum

BACKGROUND

Increased rectal volume is believed to be associated with diminished rectal sensation, i.e., rectal hyposensitivity.

AIMS

To demonstrate that patients with increased rectal volumes do not automatically have diminished rectal filling sensations.

METHODS

We, retrospectively, observed 100 adult patients with defecation problems, and 44 healthy controls who had undergone anorectal function tests. Using the balloon retention test, we analyzed the distribution of rectal volumes and pressures at different rectal filling sensation levels.

RESULTS

We found variance in the distribution of rectal volumes at all levels, while rectal pressures showed a normal distribution. We found no correlation between rectal volumes and pressures (constant sensation, r = 0.140, P = 0.163, urge sensation, r = - 0.090, P = 0.375, and maximum tolerable volumes, r = - 0.091, P = 0.366), or when taking age and sex into account. The findings for the patient group were congruent with those for the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with increased rectal volumes do not experience increased rectal pressures at any sensation level. This finding, combined with the knowledge that rectal pressure triggers rectal filling sensation, indicates that rectal filling sensations in patients with increased rectal volumes are not diminished. Therefore, "rectal hyposensitivity" should be reserved for patients with increased rectal pressure thresholds, and not for "abnormally" increased rectal volume thresholds.

Anal sphincter function as assessed by 3D high definition anorectal manometry

PURPOSE

High resolution anorectal manometry has been developed over the past years, as well as 3D high definition manometry (HDARM). However, the clinical impact of the results obtained with these new technologies remains to be determined. We thus analyzed various HDARM parameters of anal sphincter function and tested their capacity to discriminate between patients with constipation and those with fecal incontinence.

METHODS

One hundred and fourteen consecutive patients underwent the same HDARM protocol (Medtronic), including 2 short duration voluntary anal contractions (5seconds) and 1 sustained (as long as possible) contraction. Various parameters evaluating the anal sphincter function were measured, based on automatic software analysis and Smartmouse™ item of the software; resting anal pressures, anal pressures and incremental pressures during voluntary squeeze and cough anal reflex. The ability of these parameters to discriminate between patients with fecal incontinence and chronic constipation was assessed using areas under the curves of ROC curves.

RESULTS

All parameters were highly correlated. The most discriminant variable was found to be the mean anal pressure during sustained squeeze. The 3D lambda aspect of the anal sphincter during voluntary contraction was as frequently absent in both groups of patients (13% in patients with chronic constipation, versus 23% in those with fecal incontinence, P=0.18). There was a significant correlation between the fecal incontinence Wexner score and the voluntary anal contraction variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Several parameters to assess the quality of voluntary anal contraction have been proposed. We observed with HDARM that the most discriminant parameter was the mean anal pressure during sustained squeeze. This may help to standardize and simplify HDARM protocols.

Painful or Mild-Pain Constipation? A Clinically Useful Alternative to Classification as Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation Versus Functional Constipation

PURPOSE

Abdominal pain is not used to characterize constipated patients. This study aimed to compare clinical, psychological, and physiological features in patients with IBS-constipation (IBS-C) with those in patients with functional constipation (FC) according to the intensity of abdominal pain.

METHODS

All patients filled a standard Rome III questionnaire. In addition, they indicated the intensity of constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain on a 10-point Likert scale, and their stool form with the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Physiological evaluation included anorectal manometry and total and segmental colonic transit time.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 546 consecutive patients, 245 with IBS-C and 301 with FC, were included. Painful constipation (PFC) was found by cluster analysis and subsequently defined as having a value over four on the Likert scale for abdominal pain. PFC was found in 67% of IBS-C patients and in 22% of FC patients. PFC patients have digestive disorders with greater frequency and report higher levels of constipation and bloating, despite similar stool form. They have higher scores of depression, state and trait anxiety, and shorter terminal transit time than mild-pain constipated patients. Compared to IBS-C patients, PFC patients report higher levels of abdominal pain (P < 0.001). Psychological and physiological parameters were similar in PFC and IBS-C patients.

CONCLUSION

Painful constipation and mild-pain constipation could be an alternative way to identify constipated patients than using the diagnosis of IBS-C and FC for clinical evaluation and drug studies.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectoanal intussusception: prospective evaluation of clinical, physiological and morphological changes

BACKGROUND

Physiological changes after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) in patients with rectoanal intussusception (RAI) remain unclear. This study was undertaken to evaluate physiological and morphological changes after LVR for RAI, and to study clinical outcomes following LVR with special reference to fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

The study was conducted on patients who had LVR for RAI between February 2012 and December 2016 at our institution Patients with RAI and FI were included in the study. Patients with RAI and obstructed defecation and those with RAI and neurologic FI were not included. The patients had anorectal manometry preoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Defecography was performed before and 6 months after the procedure. FI was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI).

RESULTS

There were 34 patients (median age 77 years (range 60-93) years). Thirty-two patients (94%) were female and the median number of vaginal deliveries was 2 (range 0-5). Neither maximum resting pressure nor maximum squeeze pressure increased postoperatively. There was an overall increase in both defecatory desire volume (median preoperative 75 ml vs. 90 ml at 12 months; p = 0.002) and maximum tolerated volume (median preoperative 145 ml vs.175 ml at 12 months; p = 0.002). Postoperatively, RAI was eliminated in all patients but one, although 13 had residual rectorectal intussusception found at defecography. There was an overall reduction in both rectocele size (median preop 29 mm vs. postop 10 mm; p = 0.008) and pelvic floor descent (median preop 26 mm vs. postop 20 mm; p = 0.005). Twelve months after surgery, a reduction of at least 50% was observed in the FISI score for 31 incontinent patients (91%).

CONCLUSIONS

LVR for RAI produced adequate improvement of FI, and successful anatomical correction of RAI was confirmed by postoperative proctography. Postoperative increase in the rectal volume may have a positive effect on continence.

Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a substantial health problem with a prevalence of approximately 8% in community-dwelling populations. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is considered the first-line surgical treatment option in adults with FI in whom conservative therapies have failed. The clinical efficacy of SNM has never been rigorously determined in a trial setting and the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear.

Methods/design

The design encompasses a multicentre, randomised, double-blind crossover trial and cohort follow-up study. Ninety participants will be randomised to one of two groups (SNM/SHAM or SHAM/SNM) in an allocation ratio of 1:1. The main inclusion criteria will be adults aged 18–75 years meeting Rome III and ICI definitions of FI, who have failed non-surgical treatments to the UK standard, who have a minimum of eight FI episodes in a 4-week screening period, and who are clinically suitable for SNM. The primary objective is to estimate the clinical efficacy of sub-sensory SNM vs. SHAM at 32 weeks based on the primary outcome of frequency of FI episodes using a 4-week paper diary, using mixed Poisson regression analysis on the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered (0.9) to detect a 30% reduction in frequency of FI episodes between sub-sensory SNM and SHAM stimulation over a 32-week crossover period.

Secondary objectives include: measurement of established and new clinical outcomes after 1 year of therapy using new (2017 published) optimised therapy (with standardised SNM-lead placement); validation of new electronic outcome measures (events) and a device to record them, and identification of potential biological effects of SNM on underlying anorectal afferent neuronal pathophysiology (hypothesis: SNM leads to increased frequency of perceived transient anal sphincter relaxations; improved conscious sensation of defaecatory urge and cortical/subcortical changes in afferent responses to anorectal electrical stimulation (main techniques: high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetoencephalography).

Discussion

This trial will determine clinical effect size for sub-sensory chronic electrical stimulation of the sacral innervation. It will provide experimental evidence of modifiable afferent neurophysiology that may aid future patient selection as well as a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of FI.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN98760715. Registered on 15 September 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical predictors and gender-wise variations in dyssynergic defecation disorders

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient data from India regarding clinical predictors of dyssynergic defecation.

AIM

To identify demography, symptom, and colonoscopic parameters that can predict dyssynergic defecation (DD) among patients with chronic constipation (CC) and to compare the profile among male and female patients with DD.

METHODS

Data collected from three centers during June 2014 to May 2017 included age, gender, symptom duration, form and consistency of stools, digital examination, colonoscopy, and anorectal manometry (ARM). Patients were grouped based on ARM diagnosis: group I (normal study) and group II (DD). The two groups were compared for demography, symptom profile, and colonoscopy findings. Gender-wise subset analysis was done for those with the normal and abnormal ARM using chi-square and unpaired t tests.

RESULTS

Of 236 patients with CC evaluated, 130 (55%) had normal ARM and 106 (45%) had DD. Male sex, straining during defecation, bleeding per rectum, and abnormal colonoscopic diagnosis were significantly more common in group II. While bleeding per rectum and absence of urge to defecate were more common in males (p < 0.02), straining, digital evacuation, and hard stools were commoner in females with DD.

CONCLUSION

Straining during defecation, bleeding per rectum, and abnormal colonoscopy findings were more common in patients with DD. Symptoms of bleeding per rectum and absence of urge to defecate in men and straining during defecation in female patients were significantly associated with DD. Symptoms differ in males and females with DD.

3D high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with perianal fistulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistula surgery can damage the anal sphincters which may cause faecal incontinence. By measuring regional pressures, 3D-HRAM potentially provides better guidance for surgical strategy in patients with perianal fistulas. The aim was to measure regional anal pressures with 3D-HRAM and to compare these with 3D-EUS findings in patients with perianal fistulas.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with active perianal fistulas who underwent both 3D-EUS and 3D-HRAM at a clinic specialised in proctology were included. A group of 30 patients without fistulas served as controls. Data regarding demographics, complaints, previous perianal surgical procedures and obstetric history were collected. The mean and regional anal pressures were measured with 3D-HRAM. Fistula tract areas detected with 3D-EUS were analysed with 3D-HRAM by visual coding and the regional pressures of the corresponding and surrounding area of the fistula tract areas were measured. The study was granted by the VUmc Medical Ethical Committee.

RESULTS

Forty patients (21 males, mean age 47) were included. Four patients had a primary fistula, 19 were previously treated with a seton/abscess drainage and 17 had a recurrence after previously performed fistula surgery. On 3D-HRAM, 24 (60%) fistula tract areas were good and 8 (20%) moderately visible. All but 7 (18%) patients had normal mean resting pressures. The mean resting pressure of the fistula tract area was significantly lower compared to the surrounding area (47 vs. 76 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Only 2 (5%) patients had a regional mean resting pressure < 10 mmHg of the fistula tract area. Using a Δ mean resting pressure ≥ 30 mmHg difference between fistula tract area and non-fistula tract area as alternative cut-off, 21 (53%) patients were identified. In 6 patients 3D-HRAM was repeated after surgery: a local pressure drop was detected in one patient after fistulotomy with increased complaints of faecal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Profound local anal pressure drops are found in the fistula tract areas in patients normal mean resting pressures. Fistulotomy may affect local sphincter pressure. This might influence surgical decision making in future.

The Use of Standardized Questions in Identifying Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation

Background

Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is present in approximately 30% of patients with idiopathic chronic constipation (CC). Diagnostic criteria for DD require objective testing such as anorectal manometry (ARM); yet, ARM remains a limited resource in Canada. The aim of this study is to determine the predictability of DD in patients with CC using a standardized self-reported symptom questionnaire.

Method

In this study, 166 consecutive English-speaking patients with CC who were referred for ARM completed a symptom questionnaire. DD was diagnosed if pelvic floor dyssynergy was demonstrated by ARM and balloon expulsion time was more than one minute. Likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated for individual symptoms and prespecified symptom combinations. Likelihood ratios greater than five or less than 0.2 were considered significant. A recursive partitioning tree was used to find the symptoms best able to predict DD.

Results

No single constipation symptom was sufficient to predict a diagnosis of DD. Patients who reported sometimes feeling an urge to defecate and a prolonged straining duration of greater than five minutes were more likely to have DD (LR = 7.74). In patients who reported straining often or always and had a short straining duration of less than two minutes, the diagnosis of DD was less likely (LR = 0.04). The recursive partitioning tree analysis similarly identified a sense of urge with a prolonged straining duration as predictor for DD, as well as an incomplete evacuation as another potential predictor.

Conclusion

Questions regarding need to strain, duration of straining, urge to defecate, and incomplete evacuation are useful to predict the presence of DD in patients with CC. These questions will enable clinicians to make a clinical diagnosis of DD to guide treatment.

Are Obese Patients at an Increased Risk of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Compared to Non-obese Patients?

PURPOSE

Factors associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure such as chronic cough, morbid obesity, and constipation may be related to pelvic floor dysfunction. In this study, we compared anorectal manometry values and clinical data of class II and III morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery with that of non-obese patients.

METHODS

We performed a case-matched study between obese patients referred to bariatric surgery and non-obese patients without anorectal complaints. The groups were matched by age and gender. Men and nulliparous women with no history of abdominal or anorectal surgery were included in the study. Anorectal manometry was performed by the stationary technique, and clinical evaluation was based on validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Mean age was 44.8 ± 12.5 years (mean ± SD) in the obese group and 44.1 ± 11.8 years in the non-obese group (p = 0.829). In the obese group, 65.4% of patients had some degree of fecal incontinence. Mean squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese than in non-obese patients (155.6 ± 64.1 vs. 210.1 ± 75.9 mmHg, p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference regarding mean rest pressure in obese patients compared to non-obese ones (63.7 ± 23.1 vs. 74.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.051). There were no significant differences in anorectal manometry values between continent and incontinent obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of fecal incontinence among obese patients was high regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. Anal squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese patients compared to non-obese controls.