Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Malone appendicostomy: a 6-year perspective

PURPOSE

A robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach to appendicostomy offers the benefits of a minimally invasive approach to patients who would typically necessitate an open procedure, those with a larger body habitus, and those requiring combined complex colorectal and urologic reconstructive procedures. We present our experience performing robotic-assisted appendicostomies with a focus on patient selection, perioperative factors, and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent a robotic-assisted appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients underwent robotic-assisted appendicostomy (n = 8) and neoappendicostomy (n = 4) at a range of 8.8-25.8 years. Five patients had a weight percentile > 50% for their age. Seven patients underwent combined procedures. Median operative time for appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy only was 185.0 min. Complications included surgical site infection (n = 3), stricture requiring minor operative revision (n = 2), conversion to an open procedure due to inadequate appendiceal length (prior to developing our technique for robotic neoappendicostomies; n = 1), and granuloma (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 10.8 months (range 1.7-74.3 months), 91.7% of patients were consistently clean with antegrade enemas.

DISCUSSION

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy with cecal flap is a safe and effective operative approach. A robotic approach can potentially overcome the technical difficulties encountered in obese patients and can aid in patients requiring both a Malone and a Mitrofanoff in a single, combined minimally invasive procedure.

Do preoperative factors predict success of antegrade continence enemas in children?

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade continent enemas (ACE) procedures are one treatment option in children with medically refractory constipation or encopresis and predicting success is difficult. We hypothesize that there are preoperative factors that can be identified to help with patient selection and family counseling.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of children who underwent a cecostomy or appendicostomy for an ACE program between 2015 and 2021. Underlying diagnosis, pre-operative bowel regimen and imaging were analyzed. Patients were reviewed for success at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-procedure. Data was analyzed with Fisher's Exact, Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression where applicable with significance defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Forty-three children were identified; 28 were male, 15 were female, mean age at time of operation was 8 years old. 76% were considered successful at 3-months, 86% at 6-months, and 87% at 12-months post- procedure. Univariate analysis showed that a pre-ACE retrograde enema program predicted success at 3-months (94% vs. 64% p = 0.03) but no difference at 6- or 12-months. At one year after ACE procedure there was a significant reduction in number of enteral medications (2 to 0, p < 0.01) and 94% of patients were on one or fewer at one year follow-up. Age, gender, weight at time of operation, contrast enema, anorectal manometry and colonic transit time results were not predictive of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we characterized expected time to success in our population as well as identified use of a pre-operative retrograde enema program as a potential predictor of success at 3-months in children undergoing an ACE procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study.

Use of expedited post-operative protocol for children undergoing appendicostomy reduces length of hospitalization

BACKGROUND

An appendicostomy (ACE) is a surgical option for antegrade enemas in children with severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence who have failed medical management.  In 2019, we initiated an expedited post-operative protocol and sought to examine our short-term outcomes compared with our historical cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all children undergoing ACE between 2017 and 2020. Children were excluded if they underwent an associated procedure (e.g. colon resection). Patients were divided into two cohorts: historical cohort (2017-2018, Group A) and the expedited protocol (2019 to present, Group B). The primary outcome was length of stay.

RESULTS

30 patients met inclusion (Group A = 16, Group B = 14). The most common indications for ACE were constipation (50%) and constipation or fecal incontinence associated with anorectal malformation (43%). Group B experienced a decreased length of stay (1 vs 3 days, P = 0.001) without differences in 30-day surgical site infection (7.1% vs 18.8%, p = 0.61) or unplanned visit (15.4% vs 18.8%, p = 1.0). Group B had a higher prevalence of MiniACE® button placed through the appendix vs. Malone (42.8% vs 12.5%, p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Our expedited post-op protocol decreased length of stay without other significant adverse clinical sequelae.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

Anephric Neonate and Evolution of our Study on Intestinal Dialysis

Purpose:

Intestinal dialysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a proposed renal replacement therapy, and studies are going on worldwide to make it practicable. We are also doing the same study in our institution and would like to share our experience in managing an anephric neonate with intestinal dialysis in the perspective of our ongoing study of intestinal dialysis since 2010.

Patients and Methods:

We did double-ended jejunostomy in an isolated loop of the jejunum keeping the main tract intact with jejunojejunal anastomosis in this anephric neonate. Following that, we started irrigation with peritoneal dialysis fluid from the 3^rd postoperative day (POD) in that jejunal loop through jejunostomy.

Results:

This patient had no uremic features since re-admission and showed better laboratory and clinical outcomes with combined jejunal loop and colonic dialysis for 7 days. However, the patient died on the 9^th POD following severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusions:

From this study, it seems intestinal dialysis, with necessary modifications done in our subsequent patients, which might be recommended for ESRD in children as well as in adults.

Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Few studies have directly compared between cecostomy and appendicostomy for the management of fecal incontinence in pediatric population. This systematic review of the literature describes outcomes and complications following both procedures. We also reviewed studies reporting impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar were searched for chronic constipation pediatric patients who underwent cecostomy or appendicostomy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.

RESULTS

An initial literature search retrieved 633 citations. After review of all abstracts, 40 studies were included in the final analysis, assessing a total of 2086 patients. The overall rate of complications was lower in the cecostomy group compared to the appendicostomy group (16.6% and 42.3%, respectively). Achievement of fecal continence and improvement in patient quality of life were found to be similar in both groups, however the need for revision of surgery was approximately 15% higher in the appendicostomy group.

CONCLUSION

Cecostomy has less post procedural complications, however rates of patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life were similar following both procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Optimization of Pediatric Bowel Management Using an Antegrade Enema Troubleshooting Algorithm

BACKGROUND

A successful flush is the ability to flush through the appendicostomy or cecostomy channel, empty the flush through the colon, and achieve fecal cleanliness. We evaluated our experience with patients who were having flush difficulties based on a designed algorithm.

METHODS

Eight patients with flush difficulties were initially evaluated. Based on the need for additional surgery versus changes in bowel management therapy (BMT), we developed an algorithm to guide future management. The algorithm divided flush issues into before, during, and after flushing. Children aged <20 y who presented with flush issues from September 2018 to August 2019 were evaluated to determine our algorithm's efficacy. Specific outcomes analyzed included changes in BMT versus need for additional surgery.

RESULTS

After algorithm creation, 29 patients were evaluated for flush issues. The median age was 8.4 y (interquartile range: 6, 14); 66% (n = 19) were men. Underlying diagnoses included anorectal malformations (n = 17), functional constipation (n = 7), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 2), spina bifida (n = 2), and prune belly (n = 1). A total of 35 flush issues/complaints were noted: 29% before the flush, 9% during the flush, and 63% after the flush. Eighty percent of issues before the flush required surgical intervention, wherease 92% of issues during or after the flush were managed with changes in BMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Most flush issues respond to changes in BMT. This algorithm can help delineate which types of flush issues would benefit from surgical intervention and what problems might be present if patients are not responding to changes in their flush regimen.

A comparison of surgical complications after appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

There are limited data on neoappendicostomy complications owing to small patient populations. This study compares appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy procedures with an emphasis on major postoperative complications requiring either a surgical or interventional radiology procedure.

METHOD

A single-institution retrospective review included all patients with complete medical charts in the Cincinnati Children's Colorectal Database who underwent either an appendicostomy or neoappendicostomy from August 2005 through December 2016. Demographics, details of the procedure, and major postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

261 patients (appendicostomy n = 208, neoappendicostomy n = 53) with a median follow up time of 2.5 years resulted in 84 patients (appendicostomy n = 60, neoappendicostomy n = 24) experiencing a total of 118 complications requiring surgical or radiologic intervention with a significant difference between the groups (29% vs 45%, RR = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.24-2.60), p < 0.01). Skin level stricture was the most common complication (20% appendicostomies vs 30% neoappendicostomies, p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Appendicostomies and neoappendicostomies can be an effective way to manage fecal incontinence; however, 32% of our patients experienced a complication that required either a surgical or interventional radiology procedure. Patients need to be informed of the possible complications that are associated with appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy construction.

TYPE OF STUDY

Single institution retrospective review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Primary placement of a skin-level Cecostomy Tube for Antegrade Colonic Enema Administration Using a Modification of the Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC)

PURPOSE

Children failing medical management for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence may undergo surgical intervention for antegrade enema administration. We present a modification of the laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (LAPEC) procedure that allows primary placement of a skin-level device.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2015. In the modified technique the colonoscope is advanced to the cecum, cecal suspension sutures are placed under laparoscopic visualization, and percutaneous needle puncture of the cecum is performed under direct laparoscopic and endoscopic visualization. A skin-level cecostomy tube is then placed over a guide wire. Patient characteristics and 30-day results were analyzed by Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent attempted LAPEC. Successful LAPEC using both laparoscopic and endoscopic guidance was achieved in 46 (88.5%). A MIC-KEY device was placed in 38. Corflo PEG tube placement was necessary in 14 due to high BMI (mean 28.4). Colonoscopy failed to reach the cecum in 6 and laparoscopy alone was utilized to achieve successful tube placement. Cecostomy site infections occurred in 3 (5.8%), only in those undergoing PEG placement using a pull technique (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Primary placement of a skin-level device was successful in the majority of patients undergoing cecostomy tube placement for bowel management utilizing antegrade colonic enemas. This technique avoids a second anesthesia for tube conversion. Visualization via colonoscopy with the use of cecal suspension sutures is recommended. High BMI necessitates initial placement of a PEG tube and complications exclusively occurred in this group.

TYPE OF STUDY

Clinical.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Case series study.

Sacral nerve stimulation allows for decreased antegrade continence enema use in children with severe constipation

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) can be beneficial for children with constipation, but no studies have focused on children with constipation severe enough to require antegrade continence enemas (ACEs). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of SNS in children with constipation treated with ACE.

METHODS

Using a prospective patient registry, we identified patients <21years old who were receiving ACE prior to SNS placement. We compared ACE/laxative usage, PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (GSS), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and Vancouver Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome Score (DES) at baseline and progressive follow-up time intervals.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (55% male, median 12years) were included. Median ACE frequency decreased from 7 per week at baseline to 1 per week at 12months (p<0.0001). Ten children (45%) had their cecostomy/appendicostomy closed. Laxative use, GSS, FIQL, and DES did not change. FISI improved over the first 12months with statistical significance reached only at 6months (p=0.02). Six (27%) children experienced complications after SNS that required further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with severe constipation dependent on ACE, SNS led to a steady decrease in ACE usage with nearly half of patients receiving cecostomy/appendicostomy closure within 2years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy for chronic idiopathic constipation

PURPOSE

To present our experience in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence who underwent a primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy.

METHODS

We reviewed eight patients referred to the Colorectal Center from 2014 to 2016 with chronic idiopathic constipation and undergoing a sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy. We analyzed the previous medical treatment, indications for the surgical procedure, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Age at operation was 5-19 years. Time with constipation was 4-15 years. All patients received multiple laxatives, mainly polyethylene glycol, and all had severe social problems. Four patients have autism. The indication for surgery was an unsuccessful laxative trial, refusal to continue with rectal enemas or both, and social fear of continued fecal incontinence. Post-operatively, all patients were having daily bowel movements without fecal accidents.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence can obtain great benefit from primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy.