Effectiveness of novel β-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel β-lactams have in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), but their clinical performances and the selection criteria for practical use are still not clear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of novel β-lactams for PA infection in various sites and to compare the efficacy of each agent.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that used novel β-lactams to treat PA infection. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and favorable microbiological response. Subgroup analyses were performed based on drug type, drug resistance of pathogens, and site of infection. Network meta-analysis was carried out within a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

In all studies combined (16 randomized controlled trials), novel β-lactams indicated comparable performance to other treatment regimens in both outcome measures (relative risk = 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.15; P = .43) (relative risk = 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.17; P = .76). Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol had no apparent differences compared to control groups among different infection sites, drug types and drug resistance of PA. In network meta-analysis, the results showed no statistically significant differences between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol.

CONCLUSIONS

TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol are not inferior to other agents in the treatment of PA infection. Their efficacy is also comparable between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol.

Evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility on a French nationwide collection of Enterobacterales

OBJECTIVES

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) proved its efficacy for the treatment of infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Here, we aimed to provide susceptibility data on a large series of Enterobacterales since the revision of EUCAST categorization breakpoints in 2020.

METHODS

First, C/T susceptibility was determined on characterized Enterobacterales resistant to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) (extended spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] production or different levels of AmpC overexpression) (n = 213) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 259), including 170 carbapenemase producers (CPE). Then, 1632 consecutive clinical Enterobacterales responsible for infection were prospectively collected in 23 French hospitals. C/T susceptibility was determined by E-test® (biomérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD) (Sensititre™, Thermo Scientific) to perform method comparison.

RESULTS

Within the collection isolates, 88% of 3GC resistant strains were susceptible to C/T, with important variation depending on the resistance mechanism: 93% vs. 13% susceptibility for CTX-M and SHV-ESBL producers, respectively. Only 20% of the CRE were susceptible to C/T. Among CPE, 80% of OXA-48-like producers were susceptible to C/T, whereas all metallo-β-lactamase producers were resistant. The prospective study revealed that 95.6% of clinical isolates were susceptible to C/T. Method comparison performed on these 1632 clinical isolates demonstrated 99% of categorization agreement between MIC to C/T determined by E-test® in comparison with the BMD (reference) and only 74% of essential agreement.

CONCLUSION

Overall, C/T showed good activity against wild-type Enterobacterales, AmpC producers, and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli but is less active against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CRE. E-test® led to an underestimation of the MICs in comparison to the BMD reference.

Comparative activity of newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US medical centres (2020-2021)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam and comparator agents against contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals.

METHODS

In total, 3184 isolates were collected consecutively from 71 US medical centres in 2020-2021, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute breakpoints were applied.

RESULTS

Ceftazidime-avibactam [97.0% susceptible (S)], ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.0%S), imipenem-relebactam (97.3%S) and tobramycin (96.4%S) were the most active agents against the aggregate P. aeruginosa isolate collection, and retained good activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) isolates. All other antimicrobials tested showed limited activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates. The most common infections were pneumonia (45.9%), skin and skin structure infections (19.0%), urinary tract infections (17.0%) and bloodstream infections (11.7%); ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam showed consistent activity against isolates from these infection types. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was lower among isolates from pneumonia compared with other infection types.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam were highly active, and exhibited similar coverage against a large contemporary collection of P. aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. Cross-resistance among the newer β-lactams/β-lactam inhibitors (BL/BLIs) varied markedly; ≥72.1% of isolates resistant to one of the three newer BL/BLIs approved for P. aeruginosa treatment remained susceptible to at least one of the other two BL/BLIs, indicating that all three should be tested in the clinical laboratory. These three BL/BLIs represent valuable therapeutic options for P. aeruginosa infection.

The efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of GNB infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in treating GNB infections in adult patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were retrieved until August 2022. Randomized trials and non-randomized controlled studies evaluating ceftolozane-tazobactam and its comparators in adult patients with GNB infections were included.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included. Overall, patients receiving ceftolozane-tazobactam had significant advantages in clinical cure (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.51) and microbiological eradication (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.71), especially in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients. Ceftolozane-tazobactam had a significant advantage in clinical success or microbial eradication compared with polymyxin/aminoglycosides (PL/AG) or levofloxacin. There were no significant differences in adverse events (AEs), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), and mortality between ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators. Notably, ceftolozane-tazobactam showed a significantly lower risk of acute kidney injury compared with PL/AG.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed excellent clinical and microbiological efficacy in treating GNB, especially P. aeruginosa-induced infections. The overall safety profile of ceftolozane-tazobactam was comparable to other antimicrobials, with no increased risk of CDI and obvious advantage over antibacterial agents with high nephrotoxicity.

Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Against Gram-Negative Isolates from Australia and New Zealand as part of the PACTS Surveillance 2016-2018

OBJECTIVES

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is an anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has enhanced activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and activity against Enterobacterales isolates that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC cephalosporinases. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates to C-T and comparators collected in Australia and New Zealand from 2016 to 2018 as part of the Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) surveillance.

METHODS

A total of 1693 nonduplicate Enterobacterales and 435 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected prospectively from hospitalized patients in six medical centres in Australia and two in New Zealand. Susceptibilities (S) to C-T and comparators were determined using broth microdilution. EUCAST breakpoints were used. Isolates with multi-drug resistant (MDR), extensively drug resistant (XDR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase non-carbapenem resistant (ESBL, non-CRE) phenotype, and CRE were analysed.

RESULTS

For P. aeruginosa, 97.5% were S to C-T while 89.9% were S to meropenem. According to EUCAST criteria, 86.4% were susceptible-increased exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam. MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa isolates had 76.7% and 65.4% S to C-T, respectively; 34.9% and 19.2% S to meropenem, respectively; and 23.3% and 15.4% were susceptible-increased exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam, respectively. Meropenem (99.8% S), amikacin (99.1% S), and C-T (96.5% S) were the most active against Enterobacterales. Susceptibilities to C-T were 94.3% for ESBL, non-CRE phenotype, and 78.4% for MDR isolates. Only three CRE and five XDR isolates were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These in vitro data indicate that C-T is a potent antimicrobial with activity against MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa, as well as ESBL, non-CRE phenotype isolates and MDR Enterobacterales.

Treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia using ceftolozane-tazobactam-based or colistin-based antibiotic regimens: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an emerging ‎treatment for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas ‎aeruginosa. However, limited ‎data support its use in bacteremia treatment. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia using ceftolozane-‎tazobactam-based or colistin-based regimens. ‎ PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, cohort, multicentre study included adult patients with ‎MDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with either ceftolozane-tazobactam or ‎colistin, between September 2018 and August 2021, at four hospitals in Saudi ‎Arabia. The primary endpoint was the 30-day risk-adjusted mortality. Secondary endpoints included the 14-day risk of mortality, bacterial eradication, and clinical ‎success. Cox proportional hazards ‎regression and relative risk estimation were used for analysis, as appropriate. ‎ RESULTS: In total, 46 patients were included; 17 patients received ceftolozane-‎tazobactam-based regimen, and 29 received a colistin-based regimen. There was no association with the use of ‎ceftolozane-tazobactam compared to colistin and the 30-day risk-adjusted mortality ‎‎(hazard ratio [HR] ‎0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-2.13, P = 0.42). Also, the ‎‎14-day risk of mortality and bacterial eradication were not different between the ‎ceftolozane-tazobactam and colistin regimens, HR 2.1, 95% CI 0.42-10.48; P = 0.36; and ‎relative risk (RR) 0.65; 95% CI 0.28-1.52; P = 0.30; respectively. On the other hand, ‎ceftolozane-tazobactam use was associated with higher clinical success than colistin ‎‎(RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.11-3.06: P = 0.021).‎ CONCLUSION: The risk of mortality of MDR P.aeruginosa bacteremia was ‎similar when treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam-based or colistin-based antimicrobial regimens. A higher clinical success was observed with the ceftolozane-‎tazobactam-based regimen compared to the colistin-based regimen. ‎.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus colistin for the treatment of infections due to drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) to colistin-based regimen for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa.

METHOD

This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of inpatients who received either C-T or intravenous colistin for treating infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. The study was conducted in 5 tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Main study outcomes included clinical cure at end of treatment, in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model were conducted to evaluate the independent effect of C-T on the clinical outcome.

RESULT

A total of 184 patients were included in the study: 82 patients received C-T and 102 patients received colistin-based regimen. Clinical cure (77% vs 57%; P = 0.005; OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.32-4.79) was significantly more common in patients who received C-T. After adjusting the difference between the two groups, treatment with C-T is independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.16-5.27). In-hospital mortality (39% vs 49%; P = 0.175; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37-1.20) was lower in patients who received C-T but the difference was not significant. AKI (15% vs 41%; P < 0.001; OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.51) was significantly less common in patients who received C-T.

CONCLUSION

C-T is associated with higher rate of clinical cure and lower rate of AKI compared to colistin. Our findings support the preferential use of C-T over colistin-based regimen for treating these infections.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria from intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients from United States hospitals (2018-2020)

We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria recovered from ICU patients in US hospitals and compared them to those from non-ICU patients from the same hospitals during the same period. Overall, 4,680 isolates from ICU patients and 16,263 isolates from non-ICU patients were collected from 70 US medical centers in 2018-2020 and susceptibility tested by the broth microdilution method. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa and retained activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates. Minocycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were very active against S. maltophilia, whereas most antimicrobial agents exhibited low susceptibility to A. baumannii. Ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam were the most active agents against Enterobacterales, and retained potent activity against ESBL producers, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), MDR, and XDR isolates. In summary, antimicrobial susceptibility was generally lower and the occurrence of ESBL, CRE, MDR, and XDR phenotypes were clearly higher among ICU compared to non-ICU isolates.

Comparative activity of newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in European medical centers in 2020

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from patients with pneumonia in 29 medical centers in 2020 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution method. Ceftazidime-avibactam (95.5% susceptible), imipenem-relebactam (94.3% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (93.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (99.5% susceptible). Susceptibility rates for the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLIs) varied against isolates resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against resistant subsets from Western Europe, whereas imipenem-relebactam was slightly more active than other BL/BLIs against resistant subsets from Eastern Europe. Susceptibility rates were markedly lower in Eastern Europe than Western Europe.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU patients with pneumonia: United States, 2015-2018

OBJECTIVES

To report on the activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US intensive care units (ICUs) between 2015 and 2018. Activity against all P. aeruginosa and common resistant phenotypes are described to better inform decision-making and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

METHODS

In total, 781 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from 28 US hospitals. These isolates were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methodology using CLSI (2020) breakpoints. Phenotypes analysed included piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible (NS), cefepime-NS, ceftazidime-NS, meropenem-NS and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR).

RESULTS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent agent tested (minimum inhibitory concentration to inhibit 50% and 90% of isolates of 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively, inhibiting 97.2% at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤4 mg/L). Traditional first-line antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime and ceftazidime) demonstrated <33% susceptibility when P. aeruginosa was NS to one or more agent. Although escalation of therapy to meropenem is commonly employed clinically, meropenem susceptibility ranged from 33.6% to 44.9% if P. aeruginosa was NS to any traditional first-line antipseudomonal β-lactam agent. Conversely, ceftolozane-tazobactam remained active against isolates that were NS to other agents, inhibiting 88.4% of isolates NS to piperacillin-tazobactam, 85.0% of isolates NS to cefepime and ceftazidime, and 90.3% of isolates NS to meropenem. Ceftolozane-tazobactam also maintained activity against 73.0% of DTR isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam maintained high activity against P. aeruginosa isolated from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US ICUs, and had the greatest activity against isolates NS to one or more antipseudomonal β-lactams and DTR isolates.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered during the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) program in Spain (2016-2018)

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from intraabdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream infection (BSI) in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study.

METHODS

The susceptibility of 5,351 isolates collected in 11 Spanish hospitals (2016-2018) were analysed (EUCAST-2020 criteria) by broth microdilution and were phenotypically studied for the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). Ceftolozane-tazobactam and/or carbapenem resistant isolates were genetically characterized for ESBL and carbapenemases.

RESULTS

Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen (49.3% IAI, 54.9% UTI, 16.7% RTI and 50% BSI), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.9%, 19.1%, 13.1% and 15.4%, respectively). P. aeruginosa was isolated in 9.3%, 5.6%, 32% and 9%, respectively. The frequency of isolates with ESBLs (2016-2017) was: 30.5% K. pneumoniae, 8.6% E. coli, 2.3% Klebsiella oxytoca and 0.7% Proteus mirabilis. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was very active against non-ESBL-(99.3% susceptible) and ESBL-(95.2%) producing E. coli being less active against K. pneumoniae (98% and 43.1%, respectively) isolates. CTX-M-15 was the most prevalent ESBL in E. coli (27.5%) and K. pneumoniae (51.9%) frequently associated with OXA-48-like carbapenemase. Overall, 93% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, preserving this activity (>75%) in isolates resistant to other beta-lactams except in those resistant to meropenen or ceftazidime-avibactam. GES-5, PER-1, VIM-1/2 were the most prevalent enzymes in isolates resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed high activity rates against isolates recovered in the SMART study although it was affected in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates with ESBL and/or carbapenemases.

Serious adverse events with novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations: a large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis

The purpose of this study is to characterize adverse events (AEs) of clinical interest reported with ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, as an aid in monitoring patients affected by severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and performed disproportionality analysis, selecting only designated medical events (DMEs) where ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were reported as suspect. Serious neurological AEs were further investigated. The reporting odds ratios were calculated, deemed significant by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1. All other drugs/events recorded in FAERS and cephalosporins showing clinical evidence of neurological AEs were respectively selected as comparator for analysis of DMEs and neurotoxicity. Qualitative analysis including case-by-case assessment and deduplication was also performed. Overall, 654 and 506 reports mentioning respectively ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were found, with DMEs accounting respectively for 13.1% and 10.9% of cases. Agranulocytosis (N = 12; LL95% CI = 12.40) and pancytopenia (14; 6.18) emerged as unexpected AEs with ceftolozane-tazobactam, while acute pancreatitis (7; 8.63) was an over-reported unexpected DME with ceftazidime-avibactam. After deduplication, four unequivocally different cases of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam were retained, occurring on average after 8.8 days. Causality was probable and possible respectively in three and one case. Among neurological AEs exhibiting significant disproportionality, encephalopathy with both antibiotics and mental status changes with ceftazidime-avibactam were retained in at least three cases after deduplication. Although rare, clinicians should monitor high-risk patients (i.e. individuals affected by haematological malignances, HIV infection, or treated with concomitant myelotoxic agents) for early unexpected occurrence of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a commonly isolated pathogen in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Antimicrobial resistance is an escalating problem due to chronic colonization and frequent antimicrobial exposure. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) exhibit promising activity against antimicrobial resistant organisms, including P. aeruginosa. A retrospective review was conducted comparing the in vitro activities of C/T and CZA against 42 P. aeruginosa isolates from the respiratory tract of 32 adults with CF. The first isolate per patient per year that underwent susceptibility testing for C/T, CZA, and colistin was included. C/T was more susceptible than CZA (60% versus 43%). Thirty-eight (90%) isolates were considered highly drug resistant and demonstrated higher C/T susceptibilities compared to CZA (55% versus 45%). These results suggest using C/T while awaiting susceptibilities when standard antipseudomonal agents cannot be used.

Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators when tested against bacterial surveillance isolates collected from patients at risk of infections caused by resistant gram-negative pathogens

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a β-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has been approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis, for complicated intra-abdominal infections (with metronidazole) in adults, and for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia including ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. This study analyzed gram-negative pathogen susceptibility in US and European patients who are considered at risk for infections caused by pathogens resistant to commonly used antimicrobials: patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), patients on the hematology/oncology or transplant service who may be immunocompromised, and patients >65 years old (yo). ICU patients had the lowest susceptibility for Enterobacterales and PSA. The susceptibility for isolates from the immunocompromised and >65 yo groups was similar. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active agent against PSA, with ≥90%S for >65 yo and immunocompromised, and >80%S for ICU. Meropenem and ceftolozane-tazobactam were the most active agents against Enterobacterales.

Continuous infusion of ceftolozane-tazobactam resulted in high cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of ceftolozane in a patient with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa has limited treatment options. Treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis requires agents active against the organism in vitro and able to penetrate the cerebrospinal fluid adequately. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has been recently approved to treat various Gram-negative organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, ceftolozane's penetration into human cerebrospinal fluid is unknown. Here, we present a case of a patient with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis treated with a continuous infusion of ceftolozane-tazobactam. Samples of both serum and cerebrospinal fluid were analyzed for ceftolozane concentration on continuous infusion. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of ceftolozane were 83% of that in serum. Treatment with ceftolozane-tazobactam, along with combinations of other antibiotics, resulted in clearance of organism from the patient's cerebrospinal fluid and marked decrease in inflammatory cells. Studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam for patients with healthcare-associated meningitis.

Update of the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU

In accordance with the recommendations of, amongst others, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the recently published European treatment guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in the event of a patient with such infections, empirical antibiotic treatment must be appropriate and administered as early as possible. The aim of this manuscript is to update treatment protocols by reviewing recently published studies on the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the critically ill patients that require invasive respiratory support and patients with HAP from hospital wards that require invasive mechanical ventilation. An interdisciplinary group of experts, comprising specialists in anaesthesia and resuscitation and in intensive care medicine, updated the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance and established clinical management priorities based on patients' risk factors. Implementation of rapid diagnostic microbiological techniques available and the new antibiotics recently added to the therapeutic arsenal has been reviewed and updated. After analysis of the categories outlined, some recommendations were suggested, and an algorithm to update empirical and targeted treatment in critically ill patients has also been designed. These aspects are key to improve VAP outcomes because of the severity of patients and possible acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

Evaluation of ultra-rapid susceptibility testing of ceftolozane-tazobactam by a flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures

The urgent need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility is broadly apparent from government reports to the lay press. Accordingly, we developed a flow-cytometry assay (FCM) for evaluating ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) susceptibility directly on blood cultures (BC) requiring < 2 h from flag positivity to report. The protocol was optimized with C/T-susceptible and C/T-resistant gram-negative bacilli inoculated in BC aerobic bottles (Becton-Dickinson, USA), and afterward optimized for different C/T concentrations (1/4, 2/4, 4/4, and 8/4 mg/L) for 1 h incubation (37 °C), followed by FCM and software analysis. Fluorescent membrane permeability and membrane potential dyes were comparatively used to detect early cell lesions using the CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, USA). Repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of the assay up to 48 h after BC positivity were determined. Internal validation was performed in spiked BC bottles with 130 Enterobacterales and 32 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Porto University (Portugal), including 13 ATCC isolates. Additionally, 64 gram-negative bacilli recovered from positive BC at Ramon y Cajal Hospital (Madrid, Spain) were tested. Categorical agreement (CA) and analytical errors were calculated comparing FCM with broth microdilution results. Only the membrane potential dyes clearly distinguished CT-susceptible and CT-resistant isolates. Excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and inter-method concordance was observed. Overall, CA was 99.1% using EUCAST criteria with 2 major errors and 98.7% with CLSI criteria with 2 major and 1 minor errors. A new, accurate, and ultra-rapid FCM (< 2 h) for testing C/T susceptibility gave accurate results and would expand current FCM antimicrobial susceptibility assay.

Antimicrobial activity of cephalosporin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against drug-susceptible and drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains

Objectives

We conducted this study to test the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to the routinely used drugs and to the two recently available antimicrobial agents, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam.

Methods

We isolated the non-replicate strains of P. aeruginosa from inpatients between December 2018 and April 2019. The VITEK® MS system was used for phenotypic identification and VITEK 2 for initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We supplemented these tests with determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of four antimicrobials; imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were followed.

Results

A total of 67 strains of P. aeruginosa, including 38 multidrug-resistant strains, were obtained from various specimens. Susceptibility to various tested aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones was maintained in 49.3–56.7% and 40.0–43.3% of the total isolates. Amongst β-lactams, the strains were susceptible to the following agents in an ascending order: ceftazidime (32.8%), cefepime (37.3%), imipenem (36.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (39.0%), meropenem (44.8%), ceftazidime-avibactam (61.2%) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (62.7%). The susceptibility rates of the multidrug-resistant strains to both ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were less than 35%. High levels of resistance to the new agents (MIC > 256 ug/ml) were detected in 21 and 22 isolates.

Conclusion

Our study shows limitation in the empirical use of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam as therapeutics in serious infections. Moreover, our data highlights the need for prompt antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide their clinical usage.

An overview of ceftolozane sulfate + tazobactam for treating hospital acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a combination of a new cephalosporin, with activity similar to that of ceftazidime, and a known inhibitor of beta-lactamases. This compound shows excellent activity against most gram-negative organisms causative of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP), including extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the spectrum of activity, the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of HAP/VAP in adult patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The results of a randomized clinical trial have demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile of ceftolozane-tazobactam similar to that of its comparator for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Several retrospective studies have shown good efficacy of the drug for the treatment of respiratory infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. The use of this drug may be incorporated as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP in a carbapenem-saving setting or as a therapeutic alternative with a better safety profile than other therapeutic options in patients with infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Experience With Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Saudi Tertiary Care Center

Introduction:

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates have multiple resistance mechanisms, and there are insufficient therapeutic options to target them. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel antipseudomonal agent that contains a combination of an oxyimino-aminothiazolyl cephalosporin (ceftolozane) and a β-lactamase inhibitor (tazobactam).

Methods:

A single-center retrospective observational study between January 2017 and December 2018 for patients who had been diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infections and treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam for more than 72 hours. We assessed clinical success based on microbiological clearance as well as the clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection.

Results:

A total of 19 patients fit the inclusion criteria, with a median age was 57 years, and 53% were female. The types of infections were nosocomial pneumonia, acute bacterial skin, and skin structure infections; complicated intra-abdominal infections; and central line–associated bloodstream infections. All of the isolates were resistant to both meropenem and imipenem. The duration of therapy was variable (average of 14 days). At day 14 of starting ceftolozane-tazobactam, 18 of 19 patients had a resolution of signs and symptoms of the infection. Only 14 of 19 patients (74%) had proven microbiological eradication observed at the end of therapy. During therapy, there was no adverse event secondary to ceftolozane-tazobactam, and no Clostridium difficile infection was identified. The 30-day mortality rate was 21% (4/19).

Conclusions:

Multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infection is associated with high mortality, which would potentially be improved using a new antibiotic such as ceftolozane-tazobactam. Studies are required to explain the role of combination therapy, define adequate dosing, and identify the proper duration of treatment.

Gradient diffusion antibiogram used directly on bronchial aspirates for a rapid diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Background

In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, a rapid etiological diagnosis is crucial as incorrect or delayed treatment in the first few hours leads to a worse prognosis and a higher mortality rate. This study examines the efficacy of a rapid antibiogram on bronchial aspirates in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods

The direct gradient diffusion susceptibility testing method (GDM) on respiratory samples was compared with a standard broth microdilution method (BMD) after quantitative cultures in patients with suspicion of VAP. Samples were preselected by Gram staining (for good quality microbiological samples with a predominant single bacterial morphotype). The antibiotics tested were ceftazidime, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem, doripenem, and tedizolid.

Results

Over a 16-month study period, 445 bronchial aspirate samples were selected from 1376 samples received at our laboratory from 672 adult patients. By direct plating on Mueller-Hinton agar, we recovered 504 (95.5%) of the 528 microorganisms identified by the standard semiquantitative method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by GDM was compared with the BMD method in 472 strains (216 Enterobacteriaceae, 138 P. aeruginosa and 118 S. aureus.) and 1652 individual microorganism-antimicrobial agent combinations. There was total agreement between both methods in 98% of combinations. The Kappa index between both techniques was excellent (over 80%). There was only one potential major error for P. aeruginosa susceptibility to ceftazidime.

Conclusions

The six GDM strips directly placed on plated bronchial aspirates obtained from patients with a suspicion of VAP provided accurate and reliable susceptibility results within 24 h.

Recognizing and Overcoming Resistance to New Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the mechanisms and clinical relevance of emergent resistance to three recently introduced beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) active against resistant Gram-negative organisms: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite their recent introduction into practice, clinical reports of resistance to BLICs among typically susceptible organisms have already emerged, in some cases associated with therapeutic failure. The resistance mechanisms vary by agent, including mutations in beta-lactamase active sites, upregulation of efflux pumps, and alterations in the structure or expression of porin channels. These changes may confer cross-resistance or, rarely, increased susceptibility to related agents. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential for initial or emergent resistance to BLICs and ensure appropriate antimicrobial susceptibility testing is performed. Dose optimization and novel combinations of agents may play a role in preventing and managing resistance. Recently approved BLICs have provided important new therapeutic options against resistant Gram-negative organisms, but are already coming up against emergent resistance. Awareness of the potential for resistance, early detection, and dose optimization may be important in preserving the utility of these agents.

Efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam, alone and in combination with colistin, against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro biofilm pharmacodynamic model

OBJECTIVES

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a potential tool for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), but its efficacy against some difficult-to-treat infections has not been well defined.

METHODS

Using an in vitro pharmacodynamic biofilm model, this study evaluated the comparative efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa strains, alone and in combination with colistin. Simulated regimens of ceftolozane/tazobactam (2 g/1 g every 8 h), meropenem (2 g every 8 h) and ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h), alone and in combination with colistin (continuous infusion) were evaluated against three colistin-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant strains: MDR-HUB1, ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible and meropenem-susceptible; XDR-HUB2, ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible and meropenem-resistant; MDR-HUB3, ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-susceptible. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by decreases in bacterial counts (Δlog CFU/mL) from biofilm-embedded bacteria over 54 h. Resistance emergence was screened.

RESULTS

Among monotherapies, ceftolozane/tazobactam had low killing but no resistance appeared, ceftazidime was ineffective, colistin was initially effective but regrowth and resistance occurred, and meropenem was bactericidal against carbapenem-susceptible strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus colistin was the most effective combination against the meropenem-resistant XDR-HUB2 strain (Δlog CFU/mL 54-0 h = -4.42 vs. -3.54 for meropenem-colistin; P = 0.002), whereas this combination against MDR-HUB1 (-4.36) was less effective than meropenem-colistin (-6.25; P < 0.001). Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus colistin was ineffective against the ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant strain; meropenem plus colistin was the most bactericidal therapy (-6.37; P < 0.001 vs. others). Combinations of active beta-lactams plus colistin prevented the emergence of colistin-resistant strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of colistin plus ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem were the most appropriate treatments for biofilm-related infections caused by XDR and MDR P. aeruginosa strains, respectively. These combinations could be considered as potential treatment options for these difficult to treat infections.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam and Fosfomycin for rescue treatment of otogenous meningitis caused by XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Case report and review of the literature

•

Infections due to XDR Pseudomonas are at increased risk of complications and death.

•

CNS involvement may be due to poor CNS penetration of drugs with residual activity.

•

XDR-PA meningitis ensued during treatment with colistin for pneumonia and bacteremia.

•

CNS involvement by XDR-PA was timely suspected and quickly documented on CSF.

•

High dose C-T and Fosfomycin provided rapid control of meningitis.

Extensively drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA) strains with limited or absent residual antimicrobial susceptibility cause a growing burden of difficult-to treat infections. Treatment options are even more limited for patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, as colistin-based regimens are hampered by poor blood brain barrier penetration, being often associated with insufficient clinical and microbiological success. New treatment options are awaited, but evidence from prospective evidence-based evaluations is still lacking. Here we report a case of breakthrough otogenous meningitis caused by XDR-PA in a young patient treated with meropenem and colistin for XDR-PA bloodstream infection and pneumonia after a car-crash polytrauma. The patient was treated with off-label, high-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam and high-dose fosfomycin after characterization of CNS XDR-PA isolates, with rapid clinical and microbiological resolution of meningitis. Our experience, although based on a single case, lands preliminary support to the concept that rescue regimens including ceftolozane-tazobactam and fosfomycin may be considered for XDR-PA CNS infections in patients without alternative therapeutic options.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with bloodstream infections isolated in United States hospitals (2013-2015) as part of the Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) surveillance program

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators against 2647 Enterobacteriaceae and 355 Pseudomonas aeruginosa nonduplicate isolates collected from hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections in US hospitals from 2013 to 2015.Ceftolozane-tazobactam (95.5% susceptible), amikacin (99.2% susceptible), and meropenem (98.4% susceptible) were the most active against Enterobacteriaceae. For Enterobacteriaceae, 1.4% (n = 37) were carbapenem-resistant (CRE), and 10.2% (n = 271) exhibited an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. The most common ESBL enzyme detected was bla_CTX-M-15-like (n = 159). Whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype Enterobacteriaceae (87.1% susceptible), it lacked useful activity against CRE strains. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, with 97.5% susceptible. Only colistin was more active (98.9% susceptible). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than available cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam therapy for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic-cell transplant recipients

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection causes significant mortality among patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic-cell transplant recipients. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a novel therapeutic option for MDR-P. aeruginosa infections but clinical experience in these patients is limited. We report favorable clinical outcomes and lack of limiting toxicities using C-T monotherapy to treat invasive MDR-P. aeruginosa infections in these patient populations.

New Approaches to Antibiotic Use and Review of Recently Approved Antimicrobial Agents

Antimicrobial drug-resistance continues to force adaptation in our clinical practice. We explore new evidence regarding adjunctive antibiotic therapy for skin and soft tissue abscesses as well as duration of therapy for intra-abdominal abscesses. As new evidence refines optimal practice, it is essential to support clinicians in adopting practice patterns concordant with evidence-based guidelines. We review a simple approach that can 'nudge' clinicians towards concordant practices. Finally, the use of novel antimicrobials will play an increasingly important role in contemporary therapy. We review five new antimicrobials recently FDA-approved for use in drug-resistant infections: dalbavancin, oritavancin, ceftaroline, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam.