CRISP: An Inpatient Pediatric Curriculum for Family Medicine Residents Using Clinical Reasoning and Illness Scripts

Introduction

Clinical reasoning enables safe patient care and is an important competency in medical education but can be challenging to teach. Illness scripts facilitate clinical reasoning but have not been used to create pediatric curricula.

Methods

We created CRISP (Clinical Reasoning with Illness Scripts in Pediatrics), a curriculum comprising four 1-hour learning sessions that deliberately incorporated clinical reasoning concepts and illness scripts to organize how four common chief complaints were taught to family medicine residents on inpatient pediatric rotations. We performed a multisite curriculum evaluation project over 6 months with family medicine residents at four institutions to assess whether the use of clinical reasoning concepts to structure CRISP was feasible and acceptable for learners and instructors and whether the use of illness scripts increased knowledge of four common pediatric chief complaints.

Results

For all learning sessions, family medicine residents and pediatric hospitalists agreed that CRISP's format was preferable to traditional didactic lectures. Pre-/posttest scores showed statistically significant increases in family medicine resident knowledge (respiratory distress [n = 42]: pretest, 72%, posttest, 92%; abdominal pain [n = 44]: pretest, 82%, posttest, 96%; acute febrile limp [n = 44]: pretest, 68%, posttest, 81%; well-appearing febrile infant [n = 42]: pretest, 58%, posttest, 73%; ps < .05).

Discussion

By using clinical reasoning concepts and illness script comparison to structure a pediatric curriculum, CRISP represents a novel instructional approach that can be used by pediatric hospitalists to increase family medicine resident knowledge about diagnoses associated with common pediatric chief complaints.

Listen Before You Auscultate: An Active-Learning Approach to Bedside Cardiac Assessment

Introduction

Bedside cardiac assessment (BCA) is deficient across a spectrum of noncardiology trainees. Learners not taught BCA well may become instructors who do not teach well, creating a self-perpetuating problem. To improve BCA teaching and learning, we developed a high-quality, patient-centered curriculum for medicine clerkship students that could be flexibly implemented and accessible to other health professions learners.

Methods

With a constructivist perspective, we aligned learning goals, activities, and assessments. The curriculum used a "listen before you auscultate" framework, capturing patient history as context for a six-step, systematic approach. In the flipped classroom, short videos and practice questions preceded two 1-hour class activities that integrated diagnostic reasoning, pathophysiology, physical diagnosis, and reflection. Activities included case discussions, jugular venous pressure evaluation, heart sound competitions, and simulated conversations with patients. Two hundred sixty-eight students at four US and international medical schools participated. We incorporated feedback, performed thematic analysis, and assessed learners' confidence and knowledge.

Results

Low posttest data capture limited quantitative results. Students reported increased confidence in BCA ability. Knowledge increased in both BCA and control groups. Thematic analysis suggested instructional design strategies were effective and peer encounters, skills practice, and encounters with educators were meaningful.

Discussion

The curriculum supported active learning of day-to-day clinical competencies and promoted professional identity formation alongside BCA ability. Feedback and increased confidence on the late-clerkship posttest suggested durable learning. We recommend approaches to confirm this and other elements of knowledge, skill acquisition, or behaviors and are surveying impacts on professional identity formation-related constructs.

High-Yield, Case-Based, Interactive Workshop on Telehealth and Teleneurology With Pediatric Resident Physicians

Introduction

Increasing prevalence of neurologic disorders with an aging global population and limited availability of neurologists may lead to worse patient outcomes. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth services surged, and despite easing public health measures, the demand has remained. Telehealth technology has the potential to close the physical gaps in expanding the reach of care. This academic half-day workshop sought to provide a learning opportunity in response to these concerns.

Methods

The workshop consisted of small- and large-group case discussions among pediatric resident physicians (PGY 1-PGY 3) moderated by two child neurology faculty physicians over Zoom. Participants received a learner document with prereading articles and questions for each case. PowerPoint presentations with video demonstrations were used to introduce the cases and guide discussions.

Results

Of the 25 attendees, 14 (56% response rate) answered a nonmandatory postsession survey. Eighty-six percent of the respondents were very or extremely satisfied with the content covered and were similarly satisfied with the effectiveness of content delivery. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents found the content helpful or very helpful in preparation for the board, and 93% anticipated applying the content covered occasionally or frequently in their clinical practice.

Discussion

Small-group discussions with video demonstrations are helpful in increasing proficiency with telehealth technology and in examining board-relevant cases on pediatric patients. There is strong interest in subsequent telehealth half-day workshops that incorporate teaching through group discussions on relevant patient case scenarios.

Not Just a Pain: A Medical Simulation Case About Biased Communication and Osteomyelitis in Pediatric Sickle Cell Anemia

Introduction

Biases in communication can be harmful to patient perceptions of care and the medical team's decision-making. Optimal communication must be taught and practiced similarly to the optimal management of the complex medical conditions associated with sickle cell disease (SCD). This simulation is designed to teach about biases, optimizing communication to and about a patient with SCD, and appropriately diagnosing and managing pediatric osteomyelitis as a complication of SCD.

Methods

We designed and implemented a simulation case targeting emergency medicine residents and fellows to raise awareness about biases associated with SCD care and the complication of osteomyelitis in children with SCD. The case was delivered as a scheduled educational activity. Guided debriefing about optimizing care and communication for this patient population followed the simulation. We measured outcomes based on facilitator field notes and participant evaluations (Likert-scale and open-response questions).

Results

Forty learners of varying medical practice proficiencies, societal experiences, and demographics participated, with 30 completing the postsimulation feedback survey. A majority (97%) of participants indicated that the experience was useful and would improve their clinical performance. Participants learned from each other's language and communication styles and reflected on their own communication.

Discussion

Overall, participants found the simulation very useful as a review of the medical diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis in pediatric SCD. Moreover, they were very engaged and interested in the opportunity to learn about communication biases, particularly as these relate to SCD, to optimize their patient care.

Employing High-Fidelity Simulation for the High-Risk, Low-Frequency Diagnosis and Management of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS)

Introduction

Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) is a high-risk, low-frequency diagnosis that can be fatal and is difficult to diagnose without an obvious history of ionizing radiation exposure.

Methods

Twenty-two emergency medicine residents and one pharmacy resident participated in an hour-long simulation session. To accommodate all learners, the simulation was conducted eight times over a block of scheduled time (two to four learners/session). Sessions included a prebriefing, pre/post questionnaires, the ARS case, and a debriefing. Learners evaluated and managed a 47-year-old male (manikin) with the hematopoietic and cutaneous subsyndromes of ARS who presented with hand pain/erythema/edema and underlying signs of infection 2 weeks after an unrecognized radiation exposure. Learners had to perform a history and physical, recognize/manage abnormal vitals, order/interpret labs, consult appropriate disciplines, and initiate supportive care.

Results

There was a mean reported increase in ability to recognize signs and symptoms of ARS (p < .001) and appropriately manage a patient with this condition (p = .03) even after controlling for baseline confidence in ability to make and manage uncommon diagnoses, respectively. Learners rated this simulation as a valuable learning experience, effective in teaching them how to diagnose and treat ARS, and one they would recommend to other health care professionals.

Discussion

This simulation aimed to teach the diagnosis and initial management of the hematopoietic and cutaneous subsyndromes of ARS. It should be used to increase awareness of the potential for ionizing radiation exposure under less obvious conditions and raise the index of suspicion for ARS in the undifferentiated patient.

Teaching Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis: A Workshop for Hospitalists

INTRODUCTION

Teaching on physical examination, especially evidence-based physical diagnosis, is at times lacking on general medicine rounds. We created a hospitalist faculty workshop on teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis.

METHODS

The workshop included a systematic approach to teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis, multiple teaching resources, and observed peer teaching. A long-term follow-up session was offered several months after the workshop. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the workshop as well as after the long-term follow-up session.

RESULTS

Four workshops were conducted and attended by 28 unique participants. Five hospitalists attended long-term follow-up sessions. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, repeat sessions and long-term follow-up were limited. In paired analyses compared to preworkshop, respondents after the workshop reported a higher rate of prioritizing ( p = .008), having a systematic approach to ( p < .001), and confidence in ( p = .001) teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis. Compared to before the workshop, participants after the workshop were able to name more resources to inform teaching of evidence-based physical diagnosis ( p < .001). Informal feedback was positive. Respondents noted that the workshop could be improved by allowing more practice of the actual physical exam maneuvers and more observed teaching.

DISCUSSION

We created and implemented a workshop to train hospitalists in teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis. This workshop led to improvements in faculty attitudes and teaching skills. Long-term outcomes were limited by low participation due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Virtual Interactive Case-Based Education (VICE): A Conference for Deliberate Practice of Diagnostic Reasoning

INTRODUCTION

Current approaches to teaching diagnostic reasoning minimally address the need for deliberate practice. We developed an educational conference for internal medicine residents to practice diagnostic reasoning and examine how biases affect their differential diagnoses through cognitive autopsies.

METHODS

We formatted the Virtual Interactive Case-Based Education (VICE) conference as a clinical problem-solving exercise, in which a facilitator presents a case to a single discussant selected from the audience. We delivered VICE on an internet-based conferencing platform with screen-sharing capability over approximately 30 minutes. To maximize learners' psychological safety, we employed an active facilitation model that normalized uncertainty and prioritized the diagnostic process over arriving at the correct diagnosis.

RESULTS

Resident attitudes toward VICE were assessed by utilizing a postconference survey and gathering descriptive data for 11 sessions. Ninety-seven percent of respondents (n = 35) felt that VICE was a novel and valuable addition to their curriculum. Qualitative data suggested that positive features of the conference included the opportunity to practice diagnostic reasoning, the single-discussant format, and the supportive learning environment. Discussants reported that holding the conference in person would have negatively impacted their experience.

DISCUSSION

Internal medicine residents universally valued the opportunity to engage in deliberate practice of case-based reasoning in a psychologically safe environment during the VICE conference. The virtual nature of the conference contributed significantly to discussants' positive experience. This resource includes all materials necessary to implement VICE, as well as an instructional video on facilitation.

Implementation of a Hypothesis-Driven Physical Exam Session in a Transition to Clerkship Program

INTRODUCTION

The head-to-toe approach to teaching the physical examination (PE) focuses on technique and performing a comprehensive PE whereas core + clusters and hypothesis-driven PE (HDPE) approaches integrate clinical reasoning into performing a focused PE. These approaches can be implemented in a developmental sequence. We report the implementation and evaluation of an HDPE educational session.

METHODS

We designed a 3-hour HDPE session as part of a transition to clerkship program. For each of five clinical vignettes, rising third-year students worked in pairs and then in small groups to generate a differential diagnosis and determine relevant PE maneuvers. Students next performed these maneuvers on peers with facilitator observation and feedback. Students completed postsession surveys on their retrospective pre- and postsession knowledge and confidence, as well as their satisfaction with the session. We completed quantitative and qualitative analyses on survey data.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two students participated, and 140 (73%) completed the survey. Students were significantly more likely to report feeling confident generating a differential diagnosis and using it to select PE maneuvers for common complaints postsession. Over 80% of respondents felt the session improved critical thinking about patient presentations and would help them in clerkships.

DISCUSSION

Our session increased student confidence in the progression to performing an HDPE just prior to the start of clerkships. The session is feasible and straightforward to implement. It requires a large number of faculty to facilitate, but the breadth of cases used allows inclusion of faculty from all fields.

The Zombie Virus Pandemic: An Innovative Simulation Integrating Virology, Population Health, and Bioethics for Preclinical Medical Students

Introduction

Understanding population health in the context of infectious disease outbreaks is an important physician competency. However, identifying effective ways to engage early medical students in this content remains a challenge. We designed an innovative pandemic simulation for first-year medical students utilizing the pop culture theme of zombies.

Methods

This 2.5-hour simulation was conducted in 2018 and 2020 during students' virology course. Student teams collected and analyzed data to formulate hypotheses for the source pathogen. The teams completed reports explaining their diagnostic hypotheses, infection containment recommendations, and resource allocation recommendations. Learners completed an evaluation of the simulation through an online survey. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics; narrative responses were analyzed qualitatively for themes. A content analysis was performed on students' reports.

Results

Two hundred eighty-four medical students participated in this activity. Nearly all respondents agreed that the small-group format (98%, 2018 and 2020) and pace and duration (92%, 2018; 94%, 2020) were appropriate and that the activity was intellectually stimulating (97%, 2018; 96%, 2020). Learner engagement measures were high (90%-97%, 2018; 83%-96%, 2020). Analysis of students' reports revealed evidence of cognitive integration of virology, population health, and bioethics concepts, including integration of new learning content.

Discussion

Collaborative problem-solving during a simulated zombie-themed pandemic provided preclinical medical students with an engaging opportunity to integrate virology, population health, and bioethics concepts. Implementing this event required advanced planning, use of multiple spaces, learning materials preparation, and recruitment of several faculty, staff, and actors.

The Electronic Health Record Objective Structured Clinical Examination Station: Assessing Student Competency in Patient Notes and Patient Interaction

INTRODUCTION

The ability to utilize the electronic health record (EHR) without compromising the doctor-patient relationship (DPR) is an essential skill of all physicians and trainees, yet little time is spent on educating or assessing learners on needed techniques. To address this gap, we developed a conventional OSCE station coupled with a simulated patient chart within the Epic program in order to assess our students' skills utilizing the EHR during a patient encounter.

METHODS

Of third-year medical students, 119 were given full access to the patient's simulated chart 24 hours in advance of their OSCE to review clinical data. During an in-person OSCE with a standardized patient (SP), students performed a focused history and physical, using the EHR to verify allergies and medications. Students completed an electronic patient note graded by faculty. SPs evaluated the students on communication and interpersonal skills with specific rubric elements. Faculty graded the students' notes to evaluate their expression of clinical reasoning in the assessment and plan.

RESULTS

Training SPs and faculty to assess students on EHR skills was feasible. After implementation of a comprehensive curriculum focused on EHR and DPR, there was a significant difference on EHR-related communication skills (M = 76.4, SD = 17.6) versus (M = 37, SD = 28.9) before curriculum enhancement t (117.9) = -12.4, p <.001.

DISCUSSION

The EHR OSCE station provided a standardized method of assessing students' EHR skills during a patient encounter. Challenges still exist in the technological requirements to develop and deliver cases in today's EHR platform.

The Simulated Cardiology Clinic: A Standardized Patient Exercise Supporting Medical Students' Biomedical Knowledge and Clinical Skills Integration

INTRODUCTION

Development of cardiac disease-related diagnostic skills-including hypothesis-driven data gathering, heart sound interpretation, and ECG interpretation-is an important component of medical student training. Prior studies indicate trainees' performance of these skills is limited. Simulation provides students with opportunities to practice integrating their developing knowledge in a relevant clinical context. We developed a simulated clinic activity for second-year medical students consisting of standardized patient (SP) cases representing cardiovascular (CV) diseases.

METHODS

Student small groups rotated through four SP encounters. For each case, one student performed the history, after which the whole small group listened to audio files of heart sounds, interpreted an ECG, and collaboratively developed a prioritized differential diagnosis. The CV course director met with students for a large-group debrief, highlighting key learning points. We collected learners' evaluations of the event through an online survey.

RESULTS

Of students, 276 participated in this activity over the course of 2 years. Nearly all students assessed the activity as extremely or quite effective for applying learning content from the CV course (97%, 2018; 93%, 2019), and for practicing how to approach chest pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, and fatigue (100%, 2018; 95%, 2019). The most helpful aspects were reinforcement of CV disease illness scripts, hypothesis-driven data gathering practice, ECG interpretation, and applying knowledge and skills in a realistic context.

DISCUSSION

SP encounters representing CV conditions can effectively provide opportunities for students to integrate basic science knowledge and clinical skills. Students assessed the activity as helpful and engaging.

An Interactive Approach to Teaching the Clinical Applications of Autonomy and Justice in the Context of Discharge Decision-Making

INTRODUCTION

Students are taught the basics of medical ethics during their pre-clinical education, but need additional instruction on how to apply these principles to patient situations they may encounter during their clinical rotations. The ethical principles of autonomy and justice become especially pertinent to patient care in the setting of discharge decision-making. Third-year medical students would therefore benefit from an interactive educational activity that allows them to practice applying these principles within the context of discharge decision-making.

METHODS

This session was designed for third-year medical students completing their required rotation in neurology. Students participated in a 1-hour, facilitator-led, interactive, small-group, ethics-based activity meant to simulate the typical 4-day post-stroke hospital stay. Learning objectives for the activity were to enhance students' understanding of the principles of autonomy, justice, competence, and capacity. Students were given pretest to gauge prior knowledge of activity learning objectives; their knowledge was again assessed afterwards, and they were surveyed on the usefulness and value of the activity.

RESULTS

Twenty-three third-year medical students completed the activity over three sessions. The average improvement between pre- and posttest score was 40%. Lastly, on the qualitative feedback form, a majority of students strongly agreed that the activity was useful and presented new information, with 18 of 23 students giving the activity the highest possible rating of excellent.

DISCUSSION

A large majority of the students found the activity to be valuable, and the activity was shown to be effective at improving students' knowledge of a key aspect of successful medical practice.

"When in Doubt, Change It out": A Case-Based Simulation for Pediatric Residents Caring for Hospitalized Tracheostomy-Dependent Children

INTRODUCTION

Caring for technology-dependent children, such as those with tracheostomy and ventilator dependence, can be new and frightening for pediatric residents. Education about emergencies in this patient population is important because these children are at risk for in-hospital complications. Safe care of the tracheostomy-dependent child requires the ability to recognize common complications, such as tracheostomy tube obstruction or decannulation, and intervene appropriately by suctioning and/or replacing the tracheostomy tube. This simulation-based curriculum teaches learners to identify and practice the management of these tracheostomy tube complications through low-fidelity simulation exercises.

METHODS

We created a simulation session with three cases reflecting in-hospital scenarios encountered by resident physicians caring for tracheostomy-dependent children in the inpatient setting. The simulation scenario, simulation environment preparation, materials list, and debriefing outline are provided for the instructor for each simulation case. Validity evidence for the assessment tool was obtained by calculating the interrater reliability of two different raters. Resident feedback was obtained through anonymous surveys.

RESULTS

Twelve pediatric senior residents completed the experience. It received overwhelmingly positive feedback on learner evaluation forms, with 90% finding the experience very or extremely helpful. The intraclass correlation coefficient of interrater reliability for our assessment tool was 0.93.

DISCUSSION

The simulation was well received by residents. The interrater reliability was acceptable. This low-fidelity simulation exercise can easily be executed with minimal materials or instructor training. High-yield, just-in-time training with postcase debriefing is key to the simulation's success.

SPRINT Through Tasks: A Novel Curriculum for Improving Resident Task Management in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

The emergency department (ED) presents a challenging task-management environment to emergency medicine (EM) trainees. However, equipping residents with a tool to improve task switching (generically known as multitasking) could have positive impacts on patient care and physician emotional state. We designed a task-management tool and educational curriculum with the goal of improving emergency medicine resident task-switching ability.

METHODS

The task-management tool uses the acronym SPRINT: (1) stabilize critical patients, (2) perform procedures, (3) rack (see new patients in the chart rack), (4) in or out (reassess and disposition), (5) type it up (chart completion). These tasks and their order were decided on by two seasoned clinicians based on their years of experience in the ED. The SPRINT tool was taught to EM residents through a 1-hour curriculum consisting of an introductory video, a classroom-based workshop with multimedia didactics, and team learning with a card game simulating the use of the SPRINT tool on a shift. Residents were surveyed to evaluate their task-management confidence and perceived effectiveness of the curriculum.

RESULTS

A total of 34 EM residents participated in this training on the SPRINT tool. There was an improvement in resident confidence in task management, and residents reporting having a strategy for task prioritization 8 weeks after the workshop.

DISCUSSION

The SPRINT curriculum provides EM residents with a tool to manage the complex task-management environment of the ED. Further research in task-management education should focus on patient-oriented outcomes among physicians who have received this training.

A Simulated Mass Casualty Incident Triage Exercise: SimWars

INTRODUCTION

This multipatient simulation exercise encompasses triage by hospital medical providers during a mass casualty incident (MCI) involving gas line explosion with building collapse. The SimWars format allows two teams to participate in identical simulations coupled with active audience observation, followed by facilitated group discussion. The exercise requires real-time knowledge application of MCI management and helps learners develop a framework for rapidly classifying and dispositioning MCI patients.

METHODS

Two teams of provider pairs completed MCI triage of 12 simulated patients in 8 minutes with an objective of quickly and accurately dispositioning within hospital bed availability. Participants included emergency medicine and surgery physicians, with active observation by mixed provider audiences. Observers completed a checklist per patient (category: urgent/emergent/not emergent, disposition: bed type/location). At simulation conclusion, a 45-minute facilitated discussion compared observers' self-assessment of MCI patient management with the simulation teams' decisions. Finally, an expert panel discussed management decisions and MCI triage pearls.

RESULTS

Team performances (N = 4) and audience responses (N = 164) were similar on seven of 12 patients, allowing robust discussion. Participants completed an evaluation at exercise conclusion; 37% reported good/excellent ability to accomplish MCI initial triage and disposition before this exercise compared to 100% after, a statistically significant 63% increase. All postsurvey respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the exercise would change their MCI clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

The two-team format allows comparison of how different teams handle MCI triage, and active observation allows comparison of audience and team decision making.