CytoLyt fixation impedes insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) immunoreactivity compared to formalin fixation

INTRODUCTION

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is an immunohistochemical marker commonly used to confirm cytomorphological concordant neuroendocrine tumors/carcinomas (NETs/NECs), demonstrating high utility in small samples. Previous reports have suggested comparable INSM1 staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks and formalin-fixed surgical pathology specimens. This study aimed to assess INSM1 immunoreactivity using both fixation methods and investigate potential factors contributing to its variable expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective query was performed (03/31/21-05/31/22) for NET/NEC cases that had both formalin- and CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. We collected clinical data and reporting of immunostains for each case. INSM1 staining was evaluated in both fixation methods, and reported as positive, negative, or equivocal. Equivocal INSM1 staining was further scored as a percentage of 1%-100% and intensity of weak (faint staining), moderate (darker staining), and strong (dense staining).

RESULTS

Our search identified 20 cases from diverse body sites, including mediastinal lymph nodes (40%), pancreas (35%), lung (20%), and porta hepatis lymph nodes (5%). All cases exhibited a widespread positivity (over 90%) in formalin-fixed cell blocks. In contrast, CytoLyt fixed cells showed a negative stain in 65% of cases and 30% exhibited an equivocal positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

While INSM1 is previously reported as a sensitive (75%-100%) and specific (82.7%-100%) marker for NET/NECs, our study found a reduced immunohistochemical staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. Consequently, false negative INSM1 immunohistochemical results in CytoLyt-fixed cell block material may pose a pitfall in the diagnosis of NET/NEC.

PD-L1 Testing in Cytological Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: A Comparison with Biopsies and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is used for treatment prediction in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While cytology may be the only available material in the routine clinical setting, testing in clinical trials has mainly been based on biopsies.

METHODS

We included 2 retrospective cohorts of paired, concurrently sampled, cytological specimens and biopsies. Also, the literature on PD-L1 in paired cytological/histological samples was reviewed. Focus was on the cutoff levels ≥1 and ≥50% positive tumor cells.

RESULTS

Using a 3-tier scale, PD-L1 was concordant in 40/47 (85%) and 66/97 (68%) of the paired NSCLC cases in the 2 cohorts, with kappa 0.77 and 0.49, respectively. In the former cohort, all discordant cases had lower score in cytology. In both cohorts, concordance was lower in samples from different sites (e.g., biopsy from primary tumor and cytology from pleural effusion). Based on 25 published studies including about 1,700 paired cytology/histology cases, the median (range) concordance was 81-85% (62-100%) at cutoff 1% for a positive PD-L1 staining and 89% (67-100%) at cutoff 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall concordance of PD-L1 between cytology and biopsies is rather good but with significant variation between laboratories, which calls for local quality assurance.

Acinar cell induced autolysis is a frequent occurrence in CytoLyt-fixed pancreatic fine needle aspiration specimens: An analysis of 157 cytology samples

BACKGROUND

Although 10% formalin is a standard preservative in pancreatic FNAs, the effect of CytoLyt on pancreatic tissue preservation has not been systematically explored.

METHODS

Smears and cell blocks from CytoLyt-fixed (CF-CBs) and formalin-fixed (FF-CBs) pancreatic FNAs were blindly reviewed without knowledge of the fixative used, and the presence of tissue/tumor autolysis was noted. Controls included FF-CBs from pancreatic FNAs, CF-CBs from nonpancreatic FNAs, and 4 pancreatic FNAs with matched CF-CBs and FF-CBs.

RESULTS

We found that 62 of 85 (73%) pancreatic FNAs with CF-CBs showed significant autolysis, which was most pronounced in acinar cells and/or tumor cells with benign acinar cells in the background, compared with 2 of 46 (4%) FF-CBs (P < .0001) and 3 of 26 (12%) CF-CBs from nonpancreatic FNAs (73% vs 12%; P < .0001). Of the 4 pancreatic FNAs with matched CF-CBs and FF-CBs, all 4 CF-CBs showed marked autolysis versus none of the matched FF-CBs. Of the 23 (27%) pancreatic FNAs with CF-CBs that did not show autolysis, 10 had no acinar cells, and 7 had only minute tissue fragments on CB.

CONCLUSION

While CytoLyt is a useful fixative for nonpancreatic FNAs it is a suboptimal fixative for pancreatic FNAs and is associated with tissue/tumor autolysis in the majority of cases, influencing morphologic evaluation, and potentially immunocytochemical staining. Autolysis appears to be due to acinar enzymes whose effect is likely interrupted/inhibited by formalin fixation. Cytopathologists and cytotechnologists should be mindful of this pitfall and should avoid using CytoLyt as a fixative for pancreatic FNAs.

CytoLyt fixation significantly inhibits MIB1 immunoreactivity whereas alternative Ki-67 clone 30-9 is not susceptible to the inhibition: Critical diagnostic implications

BACKGROUND

The Ki-67 proliferation marker has multiple diagnostic and prognostic applications. Although several clones to the Ki-67 antigen are commercially available, the MIB1 clone is widely recommended in the surgical pathology literature for neuroendocrine tumors. In our cytopathology practice, we have encountered unexpectedly low MIB1 immunoreactivity in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks (CBs). The current study evaluated the impact of fixatives, CB processing, and immunocytochemical (ICC) procedures on Ki-67 immunoreactivity.

METHODS

Test CBs were prepared from freshly resected tumors, and multiple variables in the MIB1 ICC procedure were tested, including CytoLyt versus formalin collection media, MIB1 versus other Ki-67 clones including 30-9, and other variables. MIB1 versus Ki-67 30-9 clones were tested in parallel on CytoLyt-fixed CBs from clinical samples of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

RESULTS

In the test CBs (n = 10), the mean MIB1 labeling index was 10% in CytoLyt versus 47% in formalin (P = .0116), with a mean loss of reactivity in matched CBs of 37% (up to 70%). None of the procedure modifications tested in 223 individual ICC reactions recovered MIB1 reactivity in CytoLyt except for switching to the Ki-67 30-9 antibody. In CytoLyt-fixed SCLC samples (n = 14), the Ki-67 30-9 antibody demonstrated expected ranges of reactivity (mean, 83%; range, 60%-100%), whereas MIB1 demonstrated markedly inhibited labeling (mean, 60%; range, 10%-95%) (P = .0058).

CONCLUSIONS

CytoLyt fixation substantially inhibits MIB1 immunoreactivity, whereas the Ki-67 30-9 clone is not susceptible to inhibition. Markedly discrepant MIB1 reactivity may present a pitfall in the diagnosis of SCLC and may lead to the incorrect prognostic stratification of other tumor types. For laboratories using CytoLyt, we recommend using the Ki-67 30-9 antibody rather than the MIB1 antibody.