Cost-effectiveness of the ADVISE trial: An intraoperative OCT protocol in DMEK surgery

The intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) is recently introduced in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery, which aims to increase clinical performance and surgery safety. However, the acquisition of this modality is a substantial investment. The objective of this paper is to report on the cost-effectiveness of an iOCT-protocol in DMEK surgery with the Advanced Visualization in Corneal Surgery Evaluation (ADVISE) trial. This cost-effectiveness analysis uses data 6 months postoperatively from the multicentre prospective randomized clinical ADVISE trial. Sixty-five patients were randomized to usual care (n = 33) or the iOCT-protocol (n = 32). Quality-Adjusted Life Years (EQ-5D-5L), Vision-related Quality of Life (NEI-VFQ-25) and self-administered resources questionnaires were administered. Main outcome is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and sensitivity analyses. The iOCT protocol reports no statistical difference in ICER. For the usual care group compared with the iOCT protocol, respectively, the mean societal costs are €5027 compared with €4920 (Δ€107). The sensitivity analyses report the highest variability on time variables. This economic evaluation learned that there is no added value in quality of life or cost-effectiveness in using the iOCT protocol in DMEK surgery. The variability of cost variables depends on the characteristics of an eye clinic. The added value of iOCT could gain incrementally by increasing surgical efficiency, and aiding in surgical decision-making.

Novel technique to improves graft unfolding in vitrectomized eyes during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

INTRODUCTION

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is commonly used to treat endothelial pathologies in bicameral pseudophakic eyes with a normal depth of the anterior chamber. However, performing this procedure on eyes that have undergone vitrectomy carries a higher risk of complications. Therefore, this report presents a novel technique for improving the unfolding of a DMEK graft in a vitrectomized eye.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 49-year-old man with a history of complicated cataract surgery one year prior was referred to our clinic with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in his left eye. The surgery involved a posterior capsular rupture, anterior vitrectomy, and implantation of a sulcus three-piece intraocular lens. DMEK and anterior vitrectomy were performed. However, the conventional tap technique was unsuccessful in unfolding the DMEK graft, owing to intraoperative hypotony and an inability to flatten the anterior chamber.

DISCUSSION

To minimize excessive manipulation of the donor tissue, a 27-gauge cannula attached to a 3-cc syringe was used. A cannula was introduced through paracentesis near the edge of an unfolded DMEK graft. We then created a suction force by pulling back the plunger while slowly moving the needle backward during the graft unfolding. The postoperative course was uneventful, with a clear and fully attached DMEK graft.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique reduces the complexity of DMEK graft unfolding in vitrectomized eyes, enabling easier and more controlled unfolding. However, further research with larger patient populations is required to determine the clinical relevance of this method.

Re-descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with preservation of the original graft after free roll in anterior chamber: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Lamellar keratoplasties have had a great impact in the management of corneal edema due to endothelial dysfunction. Minimally invasive transplant techniques such as Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) have helped to reduce the morbidity involved in performing penetrating keratoplasty in this type of patient. Even so, these are complex techniques that are not free of complications and require a long line of surgical learning and an even more demanding experience in postoperative management.

CLINICAL CASE

An 89-year-old woman suffering from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and undergoing combined cataract and DMEK surgery presented stromal edema predominantly inferior and sectoral detachment of the graft 24 h after the intervention. After re-bubbling in consultations and 4 days later, the graft was observed rolled and free in the anterior chamber. She underwent re-DMEK with preservation of the original graft after 24 h, with de-epithelialization to optimize visualization. The graft was stained with trypan blue and the posterior stroma was protected with air. The graft was reimplanted under intraocular maneuvers and with an air bubble. 24 h after surgery, the adhered graft was observed, with a great decrease in stromal edema. One month later, the patient had a clear cornea, persistent complete graft adhesion, and visual acuity of 0.9.

CONCLUSION

The discovery of free roll in the anterior chamber after DMEK surgery constitutes the most complex form of graft detachment. Corneal edema as well as the arrangement of the different intraocular structures are conditions to be considered for the surgical resolution of this complication. In many cases, surgical repositioning of the graft is feasible, which means saving costs without the need to use new donor corneal tissues.

Fabrication of bioengineered corneal endothelial grafts using an allogeneic cornea-derived matrix

Corneal endothelial keratoplasty has been the primary treatment method of endothelial decompensation, but it is often limited in clinical practice due to global shortage of donor cornea. Here, we explored using an ultra-thin allogeneic cornea-derived matrix (uACM) films as a substrate for constructing bioengineered corneal endothelial grafts. We evaluated the films' optical, mechanical, and structural properties, and measured the composition of the extracellular matrix. The uACM was an ultrathin and curved cornea-shaped film with favorable optical and mechanical properties. The fabrication process efficiently preserved corneal extracellular matrix composition and significantly decreased cellular components. Moreover, human corneal endothelial cells and rabbit corneal endothelial cells (RCECs) can adhere and grow on the uACM films with a positive expression of the corneal endothelial functional markers Na+/K+-ATPase and ZO-1. The successful transplantation of uACM with RCECs grafts into the rabbit model of endothelial dysfunction via Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty resulted in prompt restoration of corneal transparency and thickness. During the four-week follow-up period, the uACM with RCECs implanted eyes exhibited comparable corneal transparency, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count to that of the healthy rabbit. Histologic examination revealed that the grafts were successfully attached and integrated onto the posterior surface of the corneal stroma. The uACM achieved biomimetic reconstruction in terms of both composition and structure, and can be used to construct the bioengineered corneal endothelial grafts. These results indicate that constructing bioengineered corneal endothelial grafts from discarded human corneal tissues may pave the way for generating high-quality corneal endothelial grafts for transplantation.

Effects of graft detachment on the central corneal thickness after uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To determine if early central corneal thickness (CCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes indicate graft detachment after uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

In this analysis of our prospectively collected ADDA registry data ( https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027180 ), 45 pseudophakic eyes underwent DMEK surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), the presence of stromal ripples on the posterior corneal surface, and BCVA measurements were assessed prior to, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Eyes were categorized into three groups: no graft detachment (group 1) (20/45; 44.4%), < 1/3 graft detachment (group 2) (14/45; 31.1%), ≥ 1/3 graft detachment followed by rebubbling (group 3) (11/45; 24.4%). Eyes in group 3 had a greater CCT prior to (746.8 ± 95.8 µm vs. 665.0 ± 74.4 µm, P = 0.041), and 1 week (666.8 ± 119.5 µm vs. 556.5 ± 56.8 µm, P = 0.001) after DMEK compared to group 1. By 1 month, CCT in all groups aligned. Comparing prior to and 1 week after DMEK, none of the eyes in group 1 had an increase in CCT, while the CCT increased in 25.0% of eyes in group 2 and 22.2% in group 3. In group 1, 90.0% had a CCT of < 600 µm 1 week after DMEK, compared to only 50.0% in group 2 and 36.4% in group 3. In group 1, 90.0% (18/20) had an improved BCVA 1 week after DMEK, while in groups 2 and 3, 86.7% (12/14) and 18.2% (2/11) improved, respectively. One patient in group 3 showed posterior stromal ripples 1 day and 1 week after DMEK.

CONCLUSION

If 1 week after uncomplicated DMEK CCT is < 600 µm and has decreased from before surgery, BCVA has improved, and there are no posterior stromal ripples, a graft detachment ≥ 1/3 and the need for rebubbling are very unlikely. In all other cases, meticulous slit-lamp and OCT inspection of the peripheral graft for detachments should be advised.

Epithelial ingrowth in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty associated with vitreous loss

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ingrowth is a rare but potentially sight-threatening complication caused by the invasion of corneal or conjunctival epithelial cells into the eye during ocular surgeries. DMEK is emerging as a widely used surgery for endothelial keratoplasty with its improved safety profile. We describe a case of epithelial ingrowth in the graft-host interface after uneventful DMEK associated with vitreous prolapse in the anterior chamber.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 81-year-old female with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent DMEK for corneal decompensation following cataract surgery. During the DMEK procedure, vitreous prolapse was observed around the intraocular lens (IOL). Her early postoperative course was unremarkable, but a dense paracentral interface opacity was observed during the 3-month follow-up. The area of epithelial ingrowth was imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a uniform nodule with a discrete increase in interface hyperreflectivity. A low-energy YAG laser was applied to remove the opacity. She maintained good vision and clear cornea without reoccurrence after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that, in addition to the introduction of epithelial cells during surgery, vitreous retention in the anterior chamber may be a risk factor by providing a scaffold that potentially aggravates epithelial ingrowth in DMEK. Our case demonstrated that early YAG intervention may disrupt interface epithelial cell growth, and the transmitted laser energy may fragment the scaffold vitreous noninvasively.

Predictive factors for re-bubbling after DMEK: focus on the posterior corneal surface

PURPOSE

To understand whether the preoperative morphology of the posterior corneal surface influences the rate of re-bubbling after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

After retrospectively analyzing the medical records of patients undergoing DMEK, in this multicentric cross-sectional study, we performed a binomial logistic regression analysis to assess significant predictors of re-bubbling and re-transplantation after surgery. Analyzed parameters included the preoperative diagnosis, anterior and posterior surface K1/K2, central corneal thickness, posterior Q value, and other posterior corneal surface parameters evaluated on the elevation maps produced by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results were stratified based on the surgeons' experience.

RESULTS

We included 202 eyes of 202 patients with a mean age of 69.5 ± 12.4 years; 154 eyes were operated by a high-volume surgeon and 48 by one with less experience; 48 eyes (23.8%) underwent [Formula: see text] 1 re-bubbling and 14(6.9%) [Formula: see text] 1 re-transplantation. The presence of positive/less-negative posterior corneal irregularities and irregularities with greater absolute height had a significantly higher risk of re-bubbling in both the expert and less expert group (OR = 2.85 and 1.42, OR = 3.22 and 3.01, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas more negative posterior K1 and K2 were significant risk factors only in the former group (OR = 0.67 and 0.55, respectively, p < 0.05). Endothelial decompensation other than Fuchs and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, more negative posterior Q values and smaller distances between center, and the highest/lowest posterior corneal surface irregularity correlated with an increased risk of graft failure (OR 1.23, 1.21, and 1.29, respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Posterior corneal surface morphology significantly influences the risk of re-bubbling after DMEK.

Phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens removal with simultaneous posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

The purpose of this study was to describe a case and clinical course of simultaneous anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (AC-pIOL) removal, implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular implantable collamer lens (ICL), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). This was a case report of a 44-year-old male with a unilateral decompensated cornea from a displaced Duet-Kelman lens on his left eye that underwent pIOL extraction and implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular ICL and simultaneous DMEK. After 6 months, the cornea of the left eye had regained clarity, the Descemet membrane was graft stable, and the ICL implanted was centered with good vault. Postoperative anisometropia was avoided. There was no development of cataracts or other complications. The simultaneous pIOL extraction, ICL implantation, and DMEK in our case showed good results with full restoration of anterior segment anatomy and return of transparency of the cornea. The current case shows the feasibility of the simultaneous approach instead of sequential as an alternative for patients with endothelial disease associated with AC pIOLs, restoring vision and anatomy and also avoiding postoperative anisometropia.

Pediatric corneal transplantation: techniques, challenges, and outcomes

Pediatric corneal transplant is a highly demanding and technically challenging procedure for the cornea surgeon in today's era. These cases pose unique challenges in clinical and surgical management. The indications of pediatric corneal transplant can be therapeutic, tectonic, optical, and cosmetic. Pediatric patients undergoing corneal transplants are at a high risk of graft infection, failure, rejection, dehiscence, and amblyopia due to young age, robust immune system, increased incidence of trauma, and compliance issues. The other factors contributing to graft failure can be allograft rejection, secondary glaucoma, corneal vascularization, multiple surgeries, vitreous prolapse, and lack of treatment compliance. A successful corneal transplant in children depends on meticulous preoperative evaluation, uneventful surgery, the expertise of a corneal surgeon, and regular and timely postoperative follow-up. Therapeutic and optical penetrating keratoplasty are the most commonly performed transplants in children. However, with the advancements in surgical technique and management protocol, the current focus has shifted toward lamellar keratoplasty. Lamellar keratoplasty offers early visual recovery and potentially fewer complications. Visual rehabilitation through corneal transplant in otherwise blind eyes can be a boon for the children. Recently, keratoprostheses have been promising in children with multiple graft failures. The current review gives insights into epidemiology, etiology, indications, clinical characteristics, investigations, management options, recent advances, and the future of pediatric corneal transplants. As surgical techniques continue to grow and comprehension of pediatric corneal transplants is improving, we can safeguard these eyes with the best possible anatomical and functional outcomes.

Late central graft detachment due to double endothelial layer after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Purpose

To report late central graft detachment after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without visual reduction.

Observations

A 71-year-old patient with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy received a DMEK in his left eye. At 11 month post-operatively, a subtotal graft detachment was noted. Due to increasing corneal edema with vision loss, the first DMEK was removed and a repeat-DMEK was performed. At four months post repeat-DMEK, the graft was fully adherent to the posterior stroma. There was no significant corneal edema, and the best corrected visual acuity was 20/25. At 16-months after repeat-DMEK, a central graft detachment was noted, but there was no concurrent corneal edema or any loss of visual acuity. The mean density of the central endothelial cells was measured at 842 cells/mm². Given the lack of corneal edema, visual reduction or subjective visual complaint, the graft detachment was followed-up for up to 20-months post repeat-DMEK with no further intervention, where the central cornea remained clear.

Conclusions and Importance

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a central repeat-DMEK graft detachment that occurred 16 months after surgery despite initial attachment. Interestingly, there was no concurrent corneal edema or vision reduction. We describe a potential mechanism for clear central cornea in the presence of a central graft detachment after repeat-DMEK.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK).

DESIGN

Registry-based study with propensity score matching.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through 2019.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure.

RESULTS

The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P = 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It's advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There's a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.

Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of the incidence, risk factors, and management of early complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A literature review of complications, that can occur from the time of the transplant up to 1 month after the transplant procedure, was conducted. Case reports and case series were included in the review.

RESULTS

Complications in the earliest postoperative days following anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have shown to affect graft survival. These complications include, but are not limited to, double anterior chamber, sclerokeratitis endothelial graft detachment, acute glaucoma, fluid misdirection syndrome, donor-transmitted and recurrent infection, and Uretts-Zavalia syndrome.

CONCLUSION

It is essential for surgeons and clinicians to not only be aware of these complications but also know how to manage them to minimize their impact on long-term transplant survival and visual outcomes.

Cost Drivers of Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

PURPOSE

To determine cost drivers of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) through evaluation of surgical costs and procedure length based on type of EK, use of preloaded grafts, and performance of simultaneous cataract surgery.

DESIGN

This study was an economic analysis of EKs at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology.

PARTICIPANTS

Endothelial keratoplasty surgical cases, including Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2016 to 2018 were included in the analysis.

METHODS

Data and inputs were obtained via the electronic health record (EHR) and from prior literature. Simultaneous cataract surgeries were included and separately categorized for analysis. Endothelial keratoplasty expenses were determined with TDABC, a method for cost calculation that incorporates the time that key resources are used and each resource's associated cost rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures included surgery length (in minutes) and day-of-surgery costs.

RESULTS

There were 559 EKs included: 355 DMEKs and 204 DSAEKs. Fewer DSAEKs had simultaneous cataract extraction (47; 23%) than DMEK (169; 48%). Of the DMEKs, 196 (55%) used preloaded corneal grafts. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cost $392.31 less (95% confidence interval, $251.05-$533.57; P < 0.0001) than DSAEK and required 16.94 fewer minutes (14.16-19.73; P < 0.0001). Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cases that used preloaded corneal grafts cost $460.19 less ($316.23-$604.14; P < 0.0001) and were 14.16 minutes shorter (11.39-16.93; P < 0.0001). In multivariate regression, preloaded graft use saved $457.19, DMEK (compared with DSAEK) saved $349.97, and simultaneous cataract surgery added $855.17 in day-of-surgery costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost analysis of TDABC identified a day-of-surgery cost and surgical time reduction associated with the use of preloaded grafts for DMEK, DMEK compared with DSAEK, and isolated EK compared with EK combined with cataract surgery. This study provides an improved understanding of surgical cost drivers and margin incentivization, which may explain trends and indirectly influence patient care decisions in cornea surgery practices.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Preloaded Imported Graft

PURPOSE

Although the popularity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is increased, there is still few clinical studies in Korea. In this study, we aimed to report the initial clinical outcomes of DMEK in patients followed up for more than 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 96 eyes that underwent DMEK by a single surgeon for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, or other indications were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative complications, and graft survival.

RESULTS

The postoperative BCVA significantly increased compared to the preoperative BCVA by 59.4% (1.00 ± 0.77 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.67 ± 0.76 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, p < 0.001). The average preoperative ECD was 754 ± 382 cells/mm2, increasing to 1,333 ± 562 cells/mm2 at 3 months (76.8%, p < 0.001), 1,334 ± 632 cells/mm2 at 6 months (76.9%, p < 0.001), 1,121 ± 474 cells/mm2 at 12 months (48.7%, p = 0.024), and 972 ± 458 cells/mm2 at 24 months postoperatively (28.9%, p = 0.445). Compared to 3 months, the ECD declined by 15.9% at 12 months (p = 0.009) and 27.1% at 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.158). The average CCT was 675 ± 113 μm preoperatively, decreasing to 581 ± 102, 574 ± 101, and 594 ± 94 μm at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK, respectively (p < 0.001 between all follow-up time points). Allograft rejection was detected in three (3.1%) and 14 eyes (14.6%) underwent retransplantation at an average of 10.1 ± 8.4 months after DMEK.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is promising for maintaining corneal clarity, low postoperative complication rates, and stable graft longevity.

Immediate postoperative topical lidocaine gel for the treatment of eye pain following corneal abrasion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) under general anaesthesia: a pilot retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing corneal abrasion as part of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) under general anesthesia suffer from early burning pain postoperatively. This pain appears to be poorly treatable with systemic analgesics. This study aims to evaluate postoperative pain management using topical lidocaine gel after DMEK with iatrogenic corneal abrasion.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive patients undergoing DMEK with corneal abrasion from October 19, 2021, to November 12, 2021, at a German university hospital. Patients during week 1 and 2 received peri-operative standard pain treatment (cohort S) and additional local lidocaine gel during week 3 and 4 immediately postoperatively (cohort L).

RESULTS

13 patients were included in cohort S and 15 patients in cohort L. At awakening all patients (100%) in cohort S reported burning pain, and six of 15 patients (40%) in cohort L reported burning pain. Burning pain scores were significantly lower in cohort L (p < 0.001 at awakening, p < 0.001 at 10 min, p < 0.001 at 20 min, p < 0.001 at 30 min, p = 0.007 at 40 min after awakening, and p < 0.001 at leaving recovery room). No significant differences between cohort S and cohort L were detected concerning surgical outcome during 1-month-follow-up (p = 0.901 for best corrected visual acuity).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing DMEK with corneal abrasion suffer significant pain in the recovery room. A single dose of topic lidocaine gel reduces the early postoperative burning pain sufficiently and does not affect the surgical outcome.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Only Using a 3D Visualization System

(1) Purpose: The aim was to analyze the outcomes of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping only (DSO) surgeries using a glasses-assisted NGENUITY® 3D visualization system (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA). (2) Methods: Five consecutive cases of DMEK surgery and four consecutive cases of DSO were performed using the NGENUITY® system in this prospective study carried out at the Arruzafa Hospital, Córdoba, Spain. Only one eye from each patient received surgery. Best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) using EDTRS charts, central corneal thickness using the Casia II optical coherence tomograph (Tomey Co., Nagoya, Japan), and endothelial cell count using the Tomey EM-4000 (Tomey Co., Nagoya, Japan) for DMEK cases or the Nidek CEM-530 (Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) specular microscopes for DSO cases were recorded preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postsurgery. (3) Results: DMEK cases included one male and four female subjects, with a mean age of 73.6 ± 9.5 years. Average improvement in CDVA 3 months after surgery was 0.46 ± 0.16 decimal. Average change in cell count between 1 and 3 months postsurgery was 360.75 ± 289.38 cells/mm2. DSO cases included four female subjects, with a mean age of 64.2 ± 9.7 years. The average improvement in CDVA 3 months after surgery was 0.09 ± 0.17 decimal. All cases also had phacoemulsification carried out. He average change in cell count between 1 and 3 months after surgery was 460 ± 515.69 cells/mm2. There were no associated complications during surgery or the follow-up period in any of the cases. (4) Conclusions: In addition to the known benefits of the use of a 3D visualization system during surgery, the present study shows that the system can be successfully used in both DMEK and DSO procedures with a very short learning curve for the surgeon.

Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study

BACKGROUND

To compare graft survival of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and identify ocular features associated with graft survival.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, cohort study. A total of 30 806 first grafts performed between 1985 and 2020 were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry and included in this observational, prospective cohort study. A total of 196 eyes underwent a primary corneal graft for ICE syndrome. Kaplan-Meier graft survival plots and Chi-squared tests were performed to identify graft survival rates for EK and PK. A history of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was also recorded and analysed. Graft survival of eyes with ICE syndrome were compared to that of other indications.

RESULTS

Grafts performed for ICE syndrome increased to 0.8% of all cases during the 2005 to 2020 period compared with 0.5% between 1985 to 2004 (χ2 =9.35, p = 0.002). From 2010, EK surpassed PK as the preferred graft type. Survival of primary grafts in eyes with ICE syndrome was lower than for other indications (log-rank = 56.62, p < 0.001). Graft survival was higher following PK than Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) (log-rank = 10.56, p = 0.001). Graft survival was higher in eyes without a history of raised IOP compared to those with a reported history of raised IOP (log-rank = 13.06, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE syndrome carries a poor prognosis for graft survival. DS(A)EK had a poorer prognosis than PK. A history of raised IOP is associated with higher risk of graft failure.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachments in superior versus temporal approach

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment rate comparing superior versus temporal main incision approach.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative study on patients who underwent DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy with main wound incision performed at either 90° in the superior approach, or at 180°/0° in the temporal approach. All main incisions were secured with a single 10-0 nylon suture at the end of surgery. Data collected were donor age and gender, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and gender, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, re-bubbling rate, air fill in the anterior chamber (AC) at day one and intra- and early postoperative complications.

RESULTS

187 eyes were included in the study. 99 eyes had DMEK surgery with superior approach, while 88 eyes had temporal approach. The two groups had no differences in donor age and sex, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and sex, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, and air fill in the anterior chamber at day one. Re-bubbling rate was 38.4% for surgeries performed with superior access and 29.5% for those with temporal access(p = 0.186). After exclusion of patients with intraoperative and/or postoperative complication, the difference in re-bubbling rate was higher, although non-significant (37.5% and 25% for superior and temporal approach respectively, p = 0.098).

CONCLUSION

The temporal approach in DMEK showed a trend towards a clinically significant lower rate of post-operative re-bubbling compared to the superior approach, however, no statistically significant difference was noted comparing the two approaches, which both remain feasible options in DMEK surgery.

Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

Corneal endothelium plays an important role in maintaining hydration homeostasis and clarity of the cornea. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) affects the corneal endothelium resulting in edema and characteristic excrescences on the Descemet's membrane known as corneal guttae. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has evolved to become the standard of care for patients with FECD with excellent visual acuity outcomes. Patients with FECD may have coexisting cataracts and therefore may require a cataract surgery, which increases the risk of corneal decompensation. The presence of FECD may not only influence the choice of intraocular lens but vision outcomes can also be affected by the corneal condition. The ability to combine the surgeries further raises important considerations regarding the timing and sequence of DMEK and cataract extraction for patients with FECD. This review provides a guide for corneal surgeons in choosing between endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery-alone, in combination or sequential-in their management of patients with FECD.

Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Asian patients

PURPOSE

To investigate risk factors for increased intraocular pressure (IOP) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in Asian patients.

METHODS

Data from January 2015 to February 2021 were obtained from our prospective database. IOP elevation after DMEK was defined as IOP ≥ 22 mmHg or an increase in IOP of ≥ 10 mmHg from baseline. In addition, we examined maximum IOP. Using iCare, we measured IOP 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after DMEK, and every 6 months thereafter. Logistic regression and linear regression were performed to find factors predictive of IOP elevation and maximum IOP, respectively, based on the results of univariate analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 90 eyes (mean patient age, 74.9 ± 7.5 years; mean follow-up duration, 25.6 ± 9.9 months) that underwent DMEK. IOP elevation was present in 19 eyes (21%). IOP increased from 12.6 ± 3.9 mmHg preoperatively to a postoperative maximum of 17.0 ± 5.5 mmHg up to 36 months after DMEK (p < 0.0001). In univariate logistic regression analysis for IOP elevation, only one variable, pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) and preexisting glaucoma, was significant (p < 0.05). Preexisting glaucoma without PEX (OR, 19.33; 95% CI, 4.75-93.46), PEX without glaucoma (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.20-41.63), and PEX glaucoma (OR, 58.00; 95% CI, 6.78-1298.29) were associated with higher risk of IOP elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, the eyes of patients with PEX and preexisting glaucoma were found to be prone to IOP elevation after DMEK.

DMEK outcome after one year - Results from a large multicenter study in Germany

PURPOSE

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) accounts for >50% of all corneal transplants in Germany. So far, no data from such a large multicenter study have been published.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 3200 DMEKs at seven departments performed for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) or bullous keratopathy (BK). We evaluated best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), endothelial cell density (ECD, cells/mm² ), minimal corneal thickness (CT, μm), rebubbling-, primary transplant failure- and immune reaction-rate. Changes over time were evaluated by linear mixed models for repeated measures and correlation with case number by center by weighted linear regression.

RESULTS

For patients without vision-limiting comorbidities (74% of all analysed eyes, n = 2270), mean BCVA improved from 0.6 ± 0.4 logMAR to 0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR 6 months (p < 0.001, n = 1441) and 0.1 ± 0.2 logMAR 12 months (p = 0.001, n = 1402) postoperatively. BK- had a worse BCVA compared to FECD-patients (0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 logMAR [p < 0.001] at 1 year). ECD declined from 2465 ± 259 cells/mm² (n = 2876 preoperatively) to 1587 ± 433 cells/mm² after 12 months (p < 0.001, n = 1237). Mean rebubbling rate was 0.4 ± 0.7/eye. 784 eyes (25%) received at least one rebubbling. More rebubblings correlated with a lower ECD, a worse BCVA, a higher CT, and higher transplant failure and rejection rates (p < 0.001, p = 0.013 for BCVA at 12 months). A single rebubbling did not influence the BCVA (p = 0.785). Graft failure rate was 3% (n = 67), rejection rate 1.5% (n = 48).

CONCLUSION

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty increases visual acuity with low transplant failure- and rejection-rates. FECD has a better outcome than BK. Since a quarter of all patients need a rebubbling, this should be included in the informed consent. Remarkably, one rebubbling has no influence on the outcome.

Posterior stromal ripples increase risk of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachment worsening over time

PURPOSE

To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) features of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts associated with graft attachment worsening over time.

METHODS

Retrospective case series on patients who received uncomplicated DMEK surgery and for whom subsequent AS-OCT data were available for analysis. Patients' demographics and surgical details were collected. AS-OCT was analysed for graft detachment axial extension, presence of posterior stromal ripples, quadrant involvement (location and number), degree of detachment extension, peripheral roll, presence and amount of air in the anterior chamber (AC). Features associated with re-bubbling and graft detachment worsening over time were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.8 years (63% females) were included. AS-OCT was performed at 2.9 ± 2.4 days after surgery. AS-OCT factors associated with re-bubbling were posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.004) and detachment axial extension (p < 0.001). At first follow-up, of the 147 DMEK, 67 showed complete attachment and 80 partial detachment. In those cases of initially completely attached grafts, posterior stromal ripples were associated with the risk of subsequent graft detachment (p = 0.014) together with recipient age (p = 0.043), phaco-combined surgery (p = 0.018) and AS-OCT timing (p = 0.033); while, in the initially partially detached grafts, detachment worsening was associated with posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.025), detachment axial extension (p = 0.003), degrees of detachment involvement (p = 0.029), peripheral roll-in shape (p = 0.033) and presence of air in the AC (p = 0.032). Relative risk (RR) of graft detachment worsening in patients with moderate/severe posterior stromal ripples was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.09-2.81).

CONCLUSION

Posterior stromal ripples and detachment axial extension >1/3 of graft surface area were the main risk factors for detachment worsening over time, and patients showing these features should be monitored closely to identify the need for re-bubbling at an early stage, thus improving surgical outcomes.

Is ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty a viable alternative to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) is a recently developed surgical procedure that has shown promising results for the management of various corneal endothelial diseases.

Objectives

To evaluate the outcomes of the UT-DSAEK to the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Design

A systematic analysis of the studies comparing UT-DSAEK with DMEK by evaluating one or more outcomes (vision, complications, and post-operative endothelial cell counts) was performed. The meta-analysis was done if two or more studies reported a common outcome.

Methods

We used PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases to identify articles comparing the outcomes of UT-DSAEK with DMEK and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan, version 5.4.

Results

A total of six studies were included in this review (two randomized clinical trials and four non-randomized comparative studies). Our analysis showed the patients who underwent DMEK cases showed better visual outcomes with a mean difference of 0.06 LogMAR (95% CI: 0.04-0.09) in BCVA, albeit with i ² of 52% (heterogenous values). The evidence was weak, with the most weightage on retrospective studies. UT-DSAEK showed significantly fewer complications such as graft dislocations, with an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.13-0.48). There was no significant difference in the endothelial cell counts with a mean difference of 86.34 (95%CI: -133.09 to -305.77).

Conclusion

Although the literature is limited on UT-DSAEK with post-operative visual acuity that could be practically at par with DMEK, lesser complication rates and comparable post-operative endothelial cells could be a suitable alternative to DMEK for corneal endothelial pathologies.

Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultrathin - Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the treatment of corneal endothelial failure in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) or Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis and conducted a literature search in PubMed and Cochrane Library, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Effects were calculated as odds ratios or standardized mean differences.

RESULTS

A total of six studies with 300 eyes in total (151 UT-DSAE and 149 DMEK) were included. BSCVA was superior in the DMEK group compared with the UT-DSAEK at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Rebubbling rates and overall adverse events were 2.37 and 1.48 times, respectively, higher in the DMEK group. The central corneal thickness and spherical equivalent were significantly lower in the DMEK group 12 months post-surgery. Endothelial cell density values were similar in both groups up to 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis comparing UT-DSAEK with DMEK. DMEK surgery resulted in significantly better BSCVA at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared to UT-DSAEK. UT-DSAEK had a better complication profile with lower rebubbling rates.

Clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty performed in eyes with keratoconus and corneal endothelial dysfunction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed in eyes with comorbid keratoconus (KCN) and corneal endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive eyes of 14 patients with comorbid stable KCN underwent DMEK for corneal endothelial dysfunction; best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), maximum corneal curvature (Kmax), maximum corneal power (Pmax), central corneal thickness (CCT), and intra- and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Excluding eyes requiring re-transplantation for primary graft failure (n = 3), all eyes showed improvement in BSCVA, reaching ≥ 20/40 (0.5) in 86%, ≥ 20/25 (0.8) in 55%, and ≥ 20/20 (1.0) in 27% by one month postoperatively; 90%, 76%, and 48% by 6 months postoperatively; and 88%, 76%, and 47% by 12 months postoperatively. CCT decreased from 571μm preoperatively to 485μm at 1 month (p < 0.001) and 481μm at 12 months (p < 0.001). Kmax decreased by a median of 1.4 diopters (D) at 1 month (p = 0.003) and 3.1 D at 12 months (p = 0.021), and every eye with a preoperative Kmax ≥ 46 D demonstrated flattening. Pmax decreased by 2.1 D at 1 month (p = 0.001) and 4.0 D at 12 months (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

DMEK is technically feasible in eyes with comorbid KCN and may give excellent outcomes visual and refractive outcomes, including significant corneal flattening, which may potentially create a visually significant hyperopic shift in patients with severely ectatic corneas.

The effect of anterior segment parameters on surgical success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To investigate how anterior segment parameters affect the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in patients with endothelial insufficiency without stromal opacities and to identify factors predisposing them to repeat keratoplasty.

METHODS

Our prospective observational study included patients who underwent primary DMEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy between March 2019 and March 2020. After a detailed ophthalmologic examination, corneal topographic analysis, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) scans, endothelial cell density (ECD) and axial length (AL) measurements were performed. Surgical success was defined as no endothelial dysfunction during follow-up. Changes in the parameters and how preoperative parameters affect surgical success were investigated.

RESULTS

In 43 eyes of 43 patients (mean age: 68.58 ± 8.51 years), mean visual acuity was 1.73 ± 0.74 LogMAR before DMEK and 0.31 ± 0.29 LogMAR in the final visit. Central corneal thickness (CCT, p = 0.026) and mean anterior chamber depth (ACD, p = 0.001) affected surgical success. Preoperative CCT values greater than 770 µm increased the risk of repeat keratoplasty by 8.75-fold, whereas preoperative ACD values less than 2.5 mm increased the risk by 2.92-fold.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative higher CCT and lower ACD values were associated with surgical failure after DMEK. Early surgery may be considered for more successful results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This prospective study has been registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov system with the registration number NCT04420429 on 06/06/2020.

Graft failure rate and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

DESIGN

In this retrospective, observational case series we included data of 150 consecutive DMEKs in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma of 150 patients after excluding data of the second treated eye of each patient and of re-DMEKs during follow-up. Cumulative incidences of IOP elevation (IOP > 21 mmHg or ≥ 10 mmHg increase in IOP from preoperative value), post-DMEK glaucoma (need of an additional intervention due to worsening of the IOP), graft rejection, and graft failure rate were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. COX regression analysis was used to evaluate independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The 36-month cumulative incidence of IOP elevation was 53.5% [95 CI 43.5-63.5%] and of post-DMEK glaucoma 36.3% [95 CI 26.3-46.3%]. Graft rejection occurred with a 36-month cumulative incidence of 9.2% [CI 95% 2.3-16.1]. None of the analyzed risk factors increased the risk for the development of graft rejection. The 36-month cumulative incidence of graft failure was 16.6% [CI 95% 8.4-24.8]. Independent risk factors for graft failure were the indication for DMEK "status after graft failure" (n = 16) compared to Fuchs' dystrophy (n = 74) (p = 0.045, HR 8.511 [CI 95% 1.054-68.756]) and pre-existing filtrating surgery via glaucoma drainage device (GDD) (n = 10) compared to no surgery/iridectomy (n = 109) (p = 0.014, HR 6.273 [CI 95% 1.456-27.031]).

CONCLUSION

The risks of postoperative complications (IOP elevation, post-DMEK glaucoma, graft rejection, and graft failure) in patients with pre-existing glaucoma are high. In particular, pre-existing filtrating surgery via GDD implantation-but not trabeculectomy-and DMEK after graft failure increase the risk of graft failure.

A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy affects the Descemet membrane and endothelium, resulting in corneal decompensation. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been the gold-standard surgical management until recently; however, at present, endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK/n-DSEK: Descemet-stripping or non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK/n-DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) is being preferred due to lesser intraoperative and postoperative complications, early visual recovery, and comparable visual outcomes. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) can be challenging, especially in pediatric eyes with CHED due to smaller eyeballs, shallow anterior chambers, phakic status, and poor intraoperative visibility due to thick and hazy corneas. A total of 198 articles matched our search strategy. After screening for duplication and going through the titles and abstracts, 12 relevant original articles, one case series, and six case reports were included in this review. Various surgical modifications have to be adopted in comparison to adult eyes to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. Regardless, studies have shown favorable visual outcomes with better graft survival and fewer complications in eyes that underwent EK compared to PKP. Hence, timely surgical intervention and strict amblyopia management can result in better final visual outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize various intraoperative difficulties and the surgical modifications required, different surgical techniques, visual and graft-related outcomes, and various complications of EK in CHED eyes.

The Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) "Wave Maneuver"

A novel technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft handling and centration without the endothelium touching the posterior part of the anterior chamber (AC), is presented here. It is particularly suitable for vitrectomized eyes, deep AC, and AC intraocular lenses (ACIOLs), potentially reducing surgery time and endothelial cell loss during surgery. This retrospective interventional case series includes 27 eyes with complex ocular pathology. All utilized a “Wave maneuver” to center an early elevated graft without completing graft centration on the bottom of the AC. Successful graft attachment and centration were evaluated intra and post-operatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and donor endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured pre-operatively, and three and six months post-operatively. DMEK grafts were successfully attached and centered in all cases. No maneuver-related complications were observed intraoperatively. BCVA improved from a pre-operative 0.2 ± 0.63, to 0.43 ± 0.49 and 0.76 ± 0.51 at the three- and six-month follow-ups, respectively (p < 0.01). CCT decreased from a pre-operative 742 ± 118, to 546 ± 87 and 512 ± 67 at three and six months, respectively (p < 0.01). ECD decreased from 2878 ± 419 cells/mm2 to 1153 ± 466 cells/mm2 at three and six months, respectively (p < 0.01). The “Wave maneuver” may be very beneficial in DMEK cases where the AC is either very deep or the bottom of the AC is compromised. The “Wave maneuver” learning curve was brief.

Graft Size and Double Scroll Formation Rate in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of intentional double scroll formation of donor Descemet membrane (DM) inside a glass tube inserter (the Fogla technique) in DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for controlled insertion and unfolding of grafts.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients who underwent DMEK were included in this study. We sought to specify graft characteristics in which double scroll configuration was successfully formed using the Fogla technique. We compared donor age, graft size, surgical time, unfolding time, and visual outcomes between patients with and without double scroll configuration. The ability to form double scroll formation of DM grafts of various diameters and unfolding time of DM grafts was evaluated using total seven eye-bank eyes in ex vivo experiments.

RESULTS

A double scroll configuration inside a glass tube was successfully obtained in six DMEK grafts (54.5%). When comparing clinical features between those with and without double scroll configuration, only graft size was significantly larger in those with double scroll configuration (7.9 ± 0.2 mm) than in those without (7.4 ± 0.4, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in other features and clinical outcomes, although unfolding-time was shorter in eyes with double scroll configuration (4.6 ± 2.0 min) compared to those without (8.6 ± 8.1, P = 0.21). Ex vivo experiments showed that unfolding time was significantly shorter in double scroll configuration (2.71 ± 0.49 min) than in single scroll (5.02 ± 0.79, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A double scroll configuration within a glass tube can be obtained more frequently in larger DMEK grafts (8.0 mm in diameter), which may result in easier and faster DMEK procedures.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) improves vision-related quality of life

Purpose

To evaluate vision-related quality of life (VRQL) before and after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Methods

The study was conducted in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy undergoing DMEK alone or in combination with cataract surgery (triple-DMEK) between August 2019 and March 2020 at the University of Leipzig Medical Center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured. Visual acuity factor (VAF) and glare factor (GF) scores were calculated using the Visual Function and Corneal Health Status Instrument questionnaire answered by patients before surgery and 6 months thereafter. Subgroup analyses were performed for DMEK versus triple-DMEK, and for first versus second eyes, in addition to correlation analyses of scores with preoperative BCVA.

Results

Forty-six patients were included in this analysis. VAF score improved from 0.68 ± 0.54 to 0.02 ± 0.57 (P < 0.0001) and GF score improved from 0.53 ± 0.43 to -0.11 ± 0.39 (P < 0.0001) during follow-up. Both scores improved without significant differences after surgery in the first and in the fellow eye (P < 0.0001) and after DMEK and triple-DMEK (P < 0.0001). The improvement of scores did not correlate with preoperative BCVA (r = 0.06, P = 0.68 for VAF; r =  -0.09, P = 0.54 for GF).

Conclusion

VRQL improves similarly after DMEK and triple-DMEK and between first and second operated eye. The extent of improvement is independent of the preoperative BCVA. The results of this study can be useful when planning DMEK by enabling a prediction of anticipated VRQL gain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-022-05711-9.

Surgeons preferences in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)

AIM

To explore the attitudes, preferences, and barriers of DMEK among corneal specialists in Saudi Arabia.

METHOD

An anonymous survey was sent through an online platform to members of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The survey was designed to capture data covering: demographic data, practice patterns of keratoplasty techniques, DMEK technique preferences, barriers, and facilitators to performing DMEK.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (33% response rate) surgeons participated in the questionnaire. Sixty-eight percent were in practice for less than or equal to 10 years. Thirteen surgeons were performing DMEK. Participating in any training capacity was observed among surgeons who performed DMEK (92%). The main selection criteria for this procedure were patients with normal anterior chamber anatomy (77%). The main barrier against DMEK adoption among surgeons who do not perform the procedure was the lack of experience (91%). Strategies to help begin performing DMEK were eye banks support (prepared grafts, backup tissue for inadvertent loss), access to wet-lab training courses, and higher surgical volume.

CONCLUSION

DMEK is not highly performed among corneal specialists in Saudi Arabia; however, there is evident interest in adopting this technique. Strategies toward filling the gap of lacking experience would facilitate the adoption of the procedure. Eye banks play a crucial role by providing prepared tissues, which would lessen part of the technical difficulty.

Photorefractive keratectomy after DMEK for corneal decompensation by phakic IOL

PURPOSE

To provide the first description of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of mild residual refractive error after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

A 45 year-old woman presenting with phakic intraocular lens (PIOL)-related corneal decompensation underwent staged DMEK surgery following PIOL explantation and cataract surgery. Eighteen months after DMEK, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/60 and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/22, with a stable refraction. The patient requested refractive surgery to decrease spectacle dependance, and wavefront-optimized PRK was performed. At last follow-up observation thirty-three months after PRK (54 months after DMEK surgery), UDVA was 20/20, the cornea remained clear without signs of rejection or endothelial failure, and the endothelial cell loss rate was not accelerated after PRK.

CONCLUSION

Since long-term visual and refractive stability can be expected after DMEK, PRK may be a particular safe and effective approach for the correction of mild residual refractive errors after DMEK. However, we consider that surgeons must exercise caution when considering keratorefractive surgery in these eyes due to postoperative changes in corneal curvature and thickness, and further studies are encouraged.

[Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after implantation of glaucoma drainage devices]

Secondary decompensation of corneal endothelium, including transplanted, is a frequent long-term complication of glaucoma drainage surgery. According to literature data, after implantation of a glaucoma drainage device into the anterior chamber, the speed of endothelial cells density (ECD) loss increases significantly.

PURPOSE

To study the possibility of performing modified Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with maximum graft diameter, and to assess its short-term effectiveness in the treatment of bullous keratopathy (BK) in the presence of a glaucoma drainage device in the anterior chamber.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Modified surgery ³/₄-DMEK was performed in 9 eyes of 7 patients with BK and Ahmed glaucoma drainage using graft of maximum diameter (11±1 mm). Average follow-up time was 15.3±2.5 months (12 to 18 months).

RESULTS

No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Mean ECD after 12 months amounted to 1664±346 cells/mm², which corresponds to ECD reduction of 34±9.6% (24 to 49%) in comparison to preoperative values. Mean best corrected visual acuity 12 months after surgery increased from 0.04±0.03 (0.01 to 0.1) to 0.3±0.2 (0.04 to 0.7). The last follow-up examination revealed all corneas to have preserved transparency and stable pachymetry measurements (from 488 to 548 µm).

CONCLUSION

Performing ³/₄-DMEK with a mega graft for treatment of BK after drainage surgery is technically possible. Absence of Descemet membrane (DM) donor and preservation of DM recipient in the drainage tube plane eliminates its contact with the endothelium. Maximum graft diameter should in the long term help prolong the effectiveness of the surgery.

Surgical peripheral iridotomy creation during intraocular surgery by intraocular diathermy probe-a novel technique

A novel technique for the creation of surgical iridotomies using a bipolar diathermic probe is described. In a cohort comprising 19 eyes of 18 patients, a 100% patency rate was achieved, with no intra- or postoperative complications.

Chord Mu (µ) and Chord Alpha (α) Length Changes in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy before and after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Surgery

This paper will evaluate chord mu and alpha length in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and its changes following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Patients with FECD that underwent DMEK surgery were included in this retrospective study. Scheimpflug Tomography was carried out in order to calculate chord mu and chord alpha lengths prior to surgery and at 3 and 12 months postoperative. This study included 27 eyes from 27 patients. Significant changes in chord mu were observed within the first three months (from 0.47 ± 0.32 to 0.29 ± 0.21 mm, p < 0.01) and remained stable 12 months postoperative (0.30 ± 0.21 mm, p > 0.05). However, chord alpha remained stable throughout the 12 months post surgery (from 0.53 ± 0.19 to 0.49 ± 0.14 mm, p > 0.05). In addition to the pupillary center distance from the corneal center (from 0.35 ± 0.25 to 0.34 ± 0.20 mm, p > 0.05) also remain stable. In FECD patients undergoing DMEK surgery, chord mu length decreased, and chord alpha length remained stable after 12 months of follow-up.

Does Storage Time Affect the Outcomes of Split Corneal Transplantation to Reduce Corneal Donor Shortage? A Retrospective Study

Split cornea transplantation can reduce the shortage of donor corneas. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of split graft storage time on the outcomes of split corneal transplantation through Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgeries. Split corneal transplantation was performed in 80 eyes using 41 donor corneas. The mean before and after splitting storage times and total storage times were recorded. Donor corneal buttons and split grafts were stored in short-term solution at 4°C. In both surgeries (DMEK and DALK), donor corneas were divided into groups depending on their storage times. Mean postoperative 12th month best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), central corneal thickness (CCT), refractive spherical equivalent (RSE), refractive astigmatism, and complication rates were compared among the groups. Correlation between storage times and 1-year BCVA, ECL, and complication rates were assessed. Clinical outcomes of the groups 1 year after the surgeries were also compared. DALK and DMEK were performed in 41 and 39 eyes, respectively. Storage times were not correlated with 1-year DMEK outcomes and only weakly correlated with post-DALK ECD, ECL, and RSE values. Except for CCT in those that underwent DALK, the outcomes of DMEK and DALK surgeries with stored and non-stored split grafts were not significantly different (P = .02). The storage times of donor corneas and split grafts do not have any impact on outcomes.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for corneal decompensation due to migrating metallic intracorneal foreign bodies in an aphakic eye following a 39-year-old blast injury: A case report

Purpose

To report the use of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) for secondary surgical removal of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) years after the trauma as migration occurred through the endothelium, damaging the endothelium, and causing corneal edema.

Observations

We report the case of a blast injury in 1972, that led to left eye traumatic cataract managed with vitrectomy and lensectomy. Although thorough removal was attempted, some corneal and conjunctival foreign bodies remained.

Despite aphakia, the patient maintained acceptable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (0.30 LogMAR) but >30 years later, experienced visual deterioration. IOFB protruding through the Descemet membrane (DM) were seen, with extensive edema. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty was performed in an attempt to treat the endothelium and remove the foreign bodies protruding through the DM. The procedure was done uneventfully under sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) and the patient improved. Four years after the surgery, BCVA was 0.63, however, 6 years later, a new episode of migrating intracorneal foreign bodies with corneal edema reduced BCVA to 0.40. The decision was made to observe the patient, and delay a second DMEK.

Conclusions and importance

Corneal decompensation caused by IOFB breaching the Descemet membrane can safely be managed with a DMEK. DMEK is feasible even in complex cases and should be attempted due to its lower risk of graft rejection and likely benefits, while saving the option of more aggressive transplantation techniques, such as penetrating keratoplasty, in cases of failure.

Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Bangkok, Thailand

Purpose

To investigate the medium-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for primary graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in Thai patients.

Patients and Methods

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Sixty-two eyes of 62 patients who underwent DMEK at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, with a minimum of 24-month follow-up were recruited. Preoperative donor and recipient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), graft clarity, endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and complications were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 67.2 ± 9.9 years, and 52% were female. The mean follow-up time was 37.5 ± 11.0 months. The most common indications for DMEK were Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) (53.2%) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) (17.7%). Nearly half of patients had triple-DMEK. The median preoperative BCVA was 20/400. Postoperative BCVA of ≥ 20/40 was reached in 37.1% and of ≥ 20/20 in 6.5% after 1 month which increased to 54.8% and 17.7% after 3 months; and to 67.7% and 27.4% after 24 months. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 30.5%, 33.8%, 44.4%, and 45.9%, respectively. Graft diameter was the single factor, showing a significant relationship with postoperative ECD. Most frequent postoperative complications included graft detachment (22.6%), increased IOP/glaucoma (17.7%), and primary graft failure (16.1%). In univariate analysis, death-to-operation time and the diagnosis of PBK were significantly associated with the occurrence of primary graft failure.

Conclusion

DMEK is a safe, effective, and feasible treatment for endothelial failure in Asian eyes. Careful case selection, use of relatively fresh donor tissues, and appropriate surgical techniques can prevent primary graft failure and facilitate optimal outcomes following surgery.

Effect of Six-Month Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density on Graft Survival after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To analyze if 6-month endothelial cell density (ECD) affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival 5 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 585 DMEK eyes were included. The study group was divided into 4 groups based on 6-month ECD quartiles: group 1 (n = 146) with 313 to 1245 cells/mm², group 2 (n = 148) with 1246 to 1610 cells/mm², group 3 (n = 145) with 1611 to 1938 cells/mm², and group 4 (n = 146) with 1939 to 2760 cells/mm². Group 1 was further split into subgroups 1a (n = 36) with 6-month ECD of ≤828 cells/mm², 1b (n = 37) with 829 to 1023 cells/mm², 1c (n = 37) with 1024 to 1140 cells/mm², and 1d (n = 36) 1141 to 1245 cells/mm².

METHODS

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Long-term ECD, graft survival, and postoperative complication rates.

RESULTS

For group 1, 6-month ECD decreased from 951 (±233) cells/mm² (n = 146) to 735 (±216) cells/mm² (n = 99) at 5 years postoperatively. Group 1 graft survival probability was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99] at 5 years postoperatively, which was lower than for groups 2 to 4 (P = 0.001). Five-year graft survival in subgroup 1a was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94), which was lower than in subgroups 1b to 1d (P = 0.001). Preoperative ECD did not influence graft survival (P = 0.400), and higher 6-month ECD values were associated with lower graft failure rates (hazard ratio, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month ECD is associated with DMEK graft survival. High early cell loss after DMEK negatively affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival. Grafts in the lowest 6-month ECD subgroup (≤828 cells/mm²) are at higher risk of failure within 5 years after DMEK. To ensure sufficiently high 6-month ECD, preoperative graft quality assessment should be optimized, and cellular stress induced to the graft should be minimized. Additionally, developing therapeutic options for the treatment of low postoperative ECD could further improve DMEK graft longevity.

Overall clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in 600 consecutive eyes: A large retrospective case series

Purpose:

To analyze the overall clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in 600 consecutive cases.

Methods:

Retrospective, consecutive interventional case series operated by a single surgeon. Six hundred consecutive eyes of 524 patients with endothelial dysfunctions of different etiologies scheduled for DMEK were included in this study. All donor tissues were prepared by the operating surgeon during the procedure, using McCarey Kaufman medium or Cornisol-preserved cornea with endothelial cell density (ECD) of ≥2500 cells/mm². Indications, postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), ECD, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and complications were analyzed postoperatively between 3 months and 2 years.

Results:

The commonest indication was post-cataract corneal edema/bullous keratopathy in 262 (43.7%) eyes followed by Fuchs′ endothelial corneal dystrophy 218 (36.3%). Vision affected comorbidities were present in 91 (15.2%) eyes. In phakic eyes with cataract (222; 37%), DMEK was combined with cataract surgery (Triple-DMEK). BSCVA of ≥20/25 was achieved in 41.0%, 46.4%, 49.2%, and 48.7% of eyes at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively and stabilized at 6 months (P = 0.54). Mean ECD decreased from 2884 ± 178 cells/mm² (n = 600) before surgery to 2223 ± 321 (n = 597), 2099 ± 354 (n = 524), 1918 ± 373 (n = 374), and 1772 ± 439 cells/mm² (n = 158) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months respectively. The corresponding mean ECL was 22.9 ± 11.4%, 27.2 ± 12.4%, 33.5 ± 13.0%, and 38.6 ± 14.3%, respectively (P < 0.05 for all-time points). The commonest complication was DM detachment in 59 (9.8%) eyes of which 23 (3.8%) eyes required rebubbling. Three (0.5%) eyes had primary graft failure. Endothelial rejection occurred in 7 (1.2%) eyes until the last follow-up.

Conclusion:

DMEK is a safe and effective procedure in different types of endothelial diseases with encouraging surgical and clinical outcomes. Complications are less and ECL percentage up to 2 years is acceptable.

Comparing the effect of three Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty injectors on endothelial damage of grafts

Purpose:

Various injectors are commercially available for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) but not all injectors have been studied for endothelial damage of grafts. The aim of the study was to compare endothelial damage in pre-stripped DMEK tissue from three clinically used injector devices: the modified Jones tube, the STAAR intraocular (IOL) injector, and the Geuder glass cannula in a laboratory setting.

Methods:

Twenty-four human donor corneas were used for this study, eight for each study arm. Each endothelial graft was pre-stripped, trephined to 8.0 mm diameter, then loaded into either the modified Jones tube, the STAAR IOL injector, or the Geuder glass cannula by an eye bank technician who had no prior experience with any of the injectors. Grafts were then ejected, stained with Calcein acetoxymethyl (AM), and quantitatively analyzed using FIJI image software. The primary outcome was the percent of endothelial damage from injector loading and injection. Donor demographics were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. The percentage of endothelial cell loss was compared across groups using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results:

The mean percent of endothelial damage from after injection of the graft was 37.8% (±SD 12.2%) for the modified Jones tube, 37.0% (±SD 13.9%) for the STAAR IOL injector, and 23.5% (±SD 5.1%) for the Geuder cannula (P = 0.008).

Conclusion:

DMEK injectors contribute to intraoperative endothelial damage of transplanted grafts. The Geuder glass cannula may offer increased ease of use and less endothelial damage compared to the modified Jones tube or STAAR IOL injector for the novice user in early cases.

Effects of uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty on the central retinal thickness

Purpose

To determine retinal thickness (RT) changes and the incidence of macular edema after uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK-ME) in patients without ME risk factors.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 107 pseudophakic eyes of 74 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) (79.4%) or bullous keratopathy (BK) (20.6%) underwent DMEK surgery between 2016 and 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University. Patients with intra- or postoperative complications as well as pre-existing risk factors for ME were excluded. Macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) measurements were performed before, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Retinal thickness (RT) was analyzed in the central foveal 1 mm (CSF), parafoveal 3 mm and 6 mm subfield.

Results

Eight eyes (7.5%) developed DMEK-ME 1 month after surgery. Six DMEK-ME eyes (75%) were rebubbled, compared with 31.3% (31 of 99; P = 0.02) of the non DMEK-ME eyes. DMEK-ME eyes had a significantly thicker CSF 1 month after surgery (432.0 ± 97.6 μm) compared with non-DMEK-ME eyes (283.7 ± 22.2 μm; P = 0.01). The other subfields and time points showed no significant RT changes. DMEK-ME significantly impaired BSCVA (0.38 ± 0.92 logMAR) only 1 month after surgery in comparison to the non DMEK-ME eyes (0.23 ± 0.87 logMAR, P = 0.015).

Conclusion

Excluding systemic and surgery-related risk factors, rebubbling increases the risk of DMEK-ME. Performing a CSF scan 1 month after surgery, particularly in rebubbled eyes, efficiently detects DMEK-ME and allows the prompt initiation of treatment, e.g., topical corticosteroid and non-steroidal (NSAID) eye drops.

Toric IOL in Combined DMEK and Cataract Surgery

Introduction

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the current gold standard surgical procedure to treat Fuchs endothelial keratoplasty. Cataract removal and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can be safely combined with this corneal procedure. This paper presents a case series in which a toric intraocular lens (IOL) was used in combined DMEK and cataract surgery to correct corneal astigmatism.

Methods

Four eyes that had a toric IOL implanted in combined cataract and DMEK surgery were included.

Results

There was a reduction in manifest refractive cylinder and improvement in uncorrected and best-corrected vision in all cases.

Discussion

Surgeons may consider the use of toric IOLs in selected cases of combined DMEK and cataract surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Bowman Layer Transplantation: An Anatomic Review and Historical Survey

For nearly a century, the definitive treatment of many corneal dystrophies and ectactic disorders was limited to penetrating keratoplasty, but over the past 2 decades, a surge of surgical innovation has propelled the treatment of many corneal diseases to more targeted approaches with significantly better visual outcomes. Anterior stromal diseases were first changed through endothelial-sparing techniques, such as deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, but have more recently transitioned to stromal-sparing approaches. Ultraviolet corneal crosslinking strengthens the cornea and halts progression of keratoconus in >90% of cases. Intracorneal ring segment and corneal allogenic ring segment implantation offer methods to flatten ectatic corneas. However, Bowman layer transplantation - inlay and more recently onlay techniques - has shown promise for treating advanced keratoconus and preventing keratoplasty. The advent of endothelial keratoplasty radically changed the treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty specifically offers an average postoperative visual acuity of 20/25 (0.8) with only 8.8% of grafts requiring retransplantation in the first 5 years. Here, we review the rapid innovations for surgical treatment of corneal diseases, spanning from endothelial keratoplasty and endothelial regeneration to anterior lamellar keratoplasty and stromal augmentation, highlighting key steps which may be moving us closer to a "postkeratoplasty" world.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in vitrectomized eyes: a case series of outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in vitrectomized eyes.

METHODS

A multi-surgeon, retrospective case series of previously vitrectomized eyes that underwent DMEK between 2013 and 2018 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patients' demographics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 14 eyes of 13 patients, aged 63 ± 14.6 years were included. Three eyes had intraoperative posterior dislocation of the DMEK graft into the vitreous cavity, two of these were aphakic and one had an unstable PCIOL. Postoperatively, one graft had a total detachment and required repeat keratoplasty for primary failure, two grafts had visually significant partial detachment and needed rebubbling. Three patients developed high intraocular pressure (IOP) and one required an urgent glaucoma drainage device 1-month post-DMEK. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.81 ± 0.42 logMAR preoperatively, and postoperatively was 0.6 ± 0.51 at 3 months (p = 0.414); 0.69 ± 0.81 at 6 months (p = 0.684); and 0.7 ± 0.8 at 12 months (p = 0.658).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK in vitrectomized eyes has unique challenges that necessitate careful preoperative planning. We observed a significant proportion of dislocated grafts in vitrectomized eyes with either unstable IOL or aphakic. Moreover, vitrectomized eyes with secondary glaucoma may be particularly vulnerable to uncontrolled IOP postoperatively and close monitoring is essential to prevent worsening of visual acuity. We recommend that DMEK may not be a feasible option in eyes that are prone to collapse, in particular aphakic vitrectomized eyes, as opposed to DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty.

Outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty over a period of 7 years at a tertiary referral center: endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and visual acuity

Purpose

To better assess clinical trajectories of patients with or without ocular comorbidity after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Background: To report on the outcomes of eyes with differing starting conditions following surgery. Design: Retrospective study at a University Eye Hospital. Participants: 361 eyes separated into group 1 (n=229; eyes with endothelial disease only) and group 2 (n=132; eyes with additional ocular comorbid conditions, such as herpetic eye disease 18/132 (13.6%), glaucoma 16/132 (12.1%), dry age-related macular degeneration 14/132 (10.6%), epiretinal membranes 10/132 (7.6%), and wet age-related macular degeneration 9/132 (6.8%)).

Methods

Consecutive eyes that underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty over a follow-up period of up to 7 years at a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, postoperative complications, graft survival, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell density.

Results

Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity at year 1 improved in both groups significantly (Wilcoxon signed rank test: group 1, p =.002; .63 to .23 logMAR; group 2, p <.001; 1.15 to .87 logMAR) with a group difference in favor of group 1 (p =.009, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon). A decrease of the endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness was noted at postoperative year 1 for both groups (paired t-tests (group 1, p <.001; group 2, p =.045) and paired t-tests (group 1, p <.001; group 2, p =.003). Complications were less common, and graft longevity was superior in group 1.

Conclusion

Eyes with different starting conditions might experience a visual improvement and benefit from surgery. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty is a valid treatment for endothelial disorders in manifold of eyes. Further long-term studies are required.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Keratoplasty - Outcome of One Single Surgeon's More Than 200 Initial Consecutive Cases

Purpose

To compare clinical outcome and complications of Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Methods

This is a retrospective study of the first consecutive cases of DSAEK and DMEK performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary referral centre. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative complications, rate of rebubbling and regraft were the main outcome measures.

Results

The study included 241 eyes, 116 subjected to DSAEK and 125 to DMEK. Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) was the predominant diagnosis in both groups. Mean BCVA at all follow-ups up to 2 years was in favour of DMEK. Median BCVA (decimal) at 1 year was 0.4 (0.13–0.60; interquartile range) for the DSAEK and 0.8 (0.6–1.0) for the DMEK group, p<0.001. Preoperative BCVA in the DSAEK group was lower than in DMEK. There was no significant difference in visual improvement between groups at 1 year postoperatively. The most common postoperative complication in both groups was a pupillary block with high intraocular pressure, 27% and 34% respectively. This was not affected by the presence of an iridectomy/iridotomy. In the DMEK group, gas provided significantly better adherence than air (p=0.020). Rebubbling for partial/total detachment was performed in 7% (DSAEK) and 11% (DMEK) of cases, p=0.361. Regraft within 2 years was performed in 13% of eyes in the DSAEK and 17% in the DMEK group, p=0.450. No case of graft rejection occurred.

Conclusion

Both DSAEK and DMEK provide overall satisfying outcome and the two techniques do not differ significantly in postoperative pupillary block, detachment rate, early graft failure or graft rejection. However, differences at baseline may have influenced or obscured potential differences. In DMEK procedures, gas seems to facilitate early graft adherence.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complicated Vitrectomized Eyes

PURPOSE

Vitrectomized eyes pose a technical challenge when performing endothelial keratoplasty (EK). The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in complex eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) prior to or during surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana infusion-assisted DMEK or pull-through DSAEK which underwent PPV prior to or during the EK at a tertiary center. Included were eyes with at least 1-year follow-up. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-two eyes (n = 52) with a mean follow-up time of 24.6 ± 7.4 months were included. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics although the DMEK group had a significantly larger proportion of Fuchs' patients (p = .009). There was no significant difference in postoperative logMAR BCVA between groups at each visit (p > .05 for all). There was a significantly higher proportion of overall serious adverse events (50.0% versus 15.4%, p = .02), retinal detachments (19.2% versus 0.0%, p = .05) and cystoid macular edema (23.1% versus 0.0%, p = .02) following DMEK. Graft detachment occurred more often following DMEK (53.9% versus 11.5%, p = .001) with no significant difference in rebubbling rates (23.1% versus 11.5%, p = .27).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant and similar improvement in BCVA was achieved following DMEK and DSAEK in complex vitrectomized eyes. Patients should be advised regarding the higher rates of potential serious complications associated with a pars plana infusion DMEK in this situation.