Outpatient parotidectomy: Outcomes, safety and satisfaction

PURPOSE

Parotidectomies are rarely performed on an outpatient basis. The specific perioperative outcomes and their management remains insufficiently described to change daily practice. The objectives were to study the outcomes, the complications and the patient satisfaction rate in parotidectomy performed on an outpatient basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric database study on 85 patients who underwent parotidectomy as a first and sole procedure from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed perioperative outcomes between outpatients and inpatients.

RESULTS

Among 28 outpatients and 57 inpatients, no significant differences in total perioperative complications (p = .66; OR = 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) [0.47; 3.36]), reoperations (p = .55), readmissions (p = 1), or unplanned visits (p = .52) were shown in multivariate analysis. The conversion rate for surgical reasons was 8.6 %, and the satisfaction rate was high.

CONCLUSION

Although outpatient parotidectomies should be as safe as for inpatients, the high rate of minor complications requires specific perioperative management, such as a systematic early postoperative visit and optimized preoperative information in order to be carried out with minimal issues.

Impact of drainless neck dissection on surgical outcome: a matched case-control study

PURPOSE

The safety of drainless lateral neck dissection (ND) remains to be proven. Hereby, we describe outcomes of drainless ND using fibrin sealant (FS).

METHODS

A retrospective, single academic institute, matched cased control. The study group included patients who underwent drainless ND (drainless group), matched to control patients by age, sex, body mass index, laterality and median number of levels dissected. Additional comparison of patients who underwent at least II-IV lateral ND for a thyroid cancer indication was also conducted. Outcomes were post-operative seroma\infections.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients (42 cases and 76 controls) were included in the study. Groups did not differ in pre-operative characteristics, percentage of bilateral ND, and extension of ND. No significant difference was found in terms of post-operative infections, seroma, aspirations, and post-operative antibiotic use. The additional analysis included 23 drainless lateral ND and matched controls, of which 91% underwent concomitant level V dissection. No significant difference was found in terms of post-operative seroma or infection. These findings were confirmed with a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Drainless ND using FS in non-violating mucosa surgeries appears to be feasible and safe, without significantly increasing post-operative seroma and its associated complications.

Drainless parotidectomy using tissue fibrin sealant - A retrospective case-control study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of drainless parotidectomy using fibrin sealant on length of stay, post-operative seroma and related complications. For this purpose, a retrospective matched case-control series was held in a single academic center. All patients who underwent drainless parotidectomies, including deep lobe tumors and revision surgeries, were compared to matched controls in which a suction drain was inserted. Main outcomes were length of hospital stay and post-operative seroma. A total of 123 patients (41 cases and 82 controls) were included in the study. Fibrin sealant group had higher rates of total parotidectomy compared with the control group (25.0% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.054). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 ± 0.3 days vs. 1.5 ± 0.6 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the fibrin sealant group and the control regarding post-operative seromas (9.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.574, respectively), aspirations rate (7.3% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.381), and infection rates (0% vs.3.7%, p = 0.550). In conclusion, drainless parotidectomy does not increase post operative seroma rates and related complications, and can also be implemented for revision surgery.

[Abdominoplasties: Do we still need to drain in 2021?]

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to consider the use of drainage when performing an abdominoplasty with regards to postoperative complications for two groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From January 1st 2017 to December 31th 2019, 215 patients underwent an abdominoplasty in our institution. In this retrospective, comparative, single institution study, patients were divided into two groups: "drainage" D (n=162) when suction completed abdominoplasty, "no drainage" ND (n=53) when suction didn't completed abdominoplasty. Early and distant complications were retrieved for each group and compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the occurrence of seroma postoperatively (8% of patients in group D and 11.3% of patients in group AD). The drainage group D experienced more seroma's punctures (2,3± 1,0) and the mean of punctured fluid was higher (386,5ml±350,4ml) compared to the no drainage group ND (1,3+- 0,5 number of punctures with a mean punctured fluid of 165,8mL± 224,2mL). The mean hospital stay was shorter for group ND (2,9± 1,8 days) than for group D (4,4+- 1,7 days), P<0,0001.

CONCLUSION

Performing an abdominoplasty with quilting suture but drainless doesn't seem to increase postoperative complications statistically. The authors recommend, under the guise of a quilting suture, not to systematically drain the abdominoplasties and to reserve this technique for patients at risk of complications (high BMI, significant weight loss and co-morbidities).