Combination of radiation therapy-immunotherapy for head and neck cancers: Promises kept?

Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin has been the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for over 20 years. Recently, immunotherapy, a new therapeutic class, has emerged for patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and has significantly extended their survival. Will it bring the same benefit to patients with localized tumors? There is a strong rationale for combining radiation therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for HNSCC. Indeed, radiation therapy can have both immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects. This is what explains the famous abscopal effect. The aim of this review is to present the data available on the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy for HNSCC.

[Abscopal effect: Myth or reality?]

The abscopal effect has been mentioned since 1953. The increase in knowledge about the immune system and the development of immunotherapies support its potential therapeutic interest. While it is accepted that radiotherapy induces an immune response, demonstrating its systemic impact is not easy. The preclinical basis is solid but its clinical validation pending. Radiotherapy rarely induces tumor reduction at a distance from the beams, probably due to its immunosuppressive effect. This is why a synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments targeting these immunosuppressive mechanisms was observed. Several parameters can modulate the induction of the abscopal effect. Among these, the fractionation of the dose seems to be determining with currently a pre-eminence of hypofractionated stereotaxis. On the other hand, even if the choice of more immunogenic targets (liver, lung) should be favoured, the optimal number of lesions to be irradiated remains to be defined as well as the minimum volume allowing sufficient release of tumor antigens. The impact of radiation-induced lymphopenia on radiotherapy/immunotherapy efficacy needs to be assessed more precisely, as does the effect of radiotherapy techniques on them. Finally, the choice of immunotherapy(ies) and the combination regimen with radiotherapy remain under discussion. A sequential scheme appears to provide less toxicities but the concomitant would lead to a better response. The study of these different parameters should allow us to deliver optimized radiotherapy/immunotherapy(ies) combinations to our metastatic patients in order to benefit as many people as possible from this abscopal effect.

Pure abscopal effect of radiotherapy in a salivary gland carcinoma: Case report, literature review, and a search for new approaches

We report the case of an 84-year-old woman with poorly differentiated non-small cell carcinoma of the right parotid who presented with headache, was found to have a primary right parotid gland cancer as well as metastatic disease, and underwent palliative radiotherapy to the primary site. The patient received no chemotherapy or immunotherapy, but both the primary site and several non-irradiated foci in the lungs regressed or completely resolved. The patient remained free of disease for about one year before progression. The case is a rare instance of abscopal regression of metastatic disease in the absence of pharmacologic immunomodulation. A literature review surveys the history of the abscopal effect of radiation therapy, attempts to understand the mechanisms of its successes and failures, and points to new approaches that can inform and improve the outcomes of radioimmunotherapy.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy: Passing fad or revolution?]

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a young technology that can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target, utilizing either a single dose or a small number of fractions with a high degree of precision within the body. Various technical solutions co-exist nowadays, with particular features, possibilities and limitations. Health care authorities have currently validated SBRT in a very limited number of locations, but many indications are still under investigation. It is therefore challenging to accurately appreciate the SBRT therapeutic index, its place and its role within the anticancer therapeutic arsenal. The aim of the present review is to provide SBRT definitions, current indications, and summarize the future ways of research. There are three validated indications for SBRT: un-resecable T1-T2 non small cell lung cancer, <3 slow-growing pulmonary metastases secondary to a stabilized primary, and the tumours located close to the medulla. In other situations, the benefit of SBRT is still to be demonstrated. One of the most promising way of research is the ablative treatment of oligo metastatic cancers, with recent studies suggesting a survival benefit. Furthermore, the most recent data suggest that SBRT is safe. Finally, the SBRT combined with immune therapies is promising, since it could theoretically trigger the adaptative anticancer response.

Combining radiation therapy and cancer immune therapies: From preclinical findings to clinical applications

Besides its direct cytotoxic effect on the tumor cells, radiation therapy is also able to elicit an immune-mediated systemic anti-tumor response, resulting in tumor regression in irradiated sites but also within distant out of field secondary lesions and providing a long-term anti-tumor response. It is now clear that associating ionizing radiation with immune therapies can enhance radio-induced anti-tumor immune responses. Over the last decade, such a combination aroused considerable interest among the scientific community, with many preclinical models and clinical trials, using many types of immune therapies and radiation regimens. In this article, we summarize the main mechanisms underlying radio-induced anti-tumor responses. We will then present an extended overview of the recent preclinical and clinical research built on this background of combined radiation and immune therapy, shedding light on what we know so far about such a promising strategy.