Furosemide stress test to predict acute kidney injury progression in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Furosemide stress test (FST) is a novel functional biomarker for predicting severe acute kidney injury (AKI); however, pediatric studies are limited.

METHODS

Children 3 months to 18 years of age admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital from Nov 2019 to July 2021 were screened and those who developed AKI stage 1 or 2 within 7 days of admission underwent FST (intravenous furosemide 1 mg/kg). Urine output was measured hourly for the next 6 h; a value > 2 ml/kg within the first 2 h was deemed furosemide responsive. Other biomarkers like plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and proenkephalin (PENK) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 480 admitted patients, 51 developed AKI stage 1 or 2 within 7 days of admission and underwent FST. Nine of these patients were furosemide non-responsive. Thirteen (25.5%) patients (eight of nine from FST non-responsive group) developed stage 3 AKI within 7 days of FST, nine (17.6%) of whom (seven from non-responsive group) required kidney support therapy (KST). FST emerged as a good biomarker for predicting stage 3 AKI and need for KST with area-under-the-curve (AUC) being 0.93 ± 0.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.0) and 0.96 ± 0.03 (95% CI 0.9-1.0), respectively. FST outperformed NGAL and PENK in predicting AKI stage 3 and KST; however, the combination did not improve the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Furosemide stress test is a simple, inexpensive, and robust biomarker for predicting stage 3 AKI and KST need in critically ill children. Further research is required to identify the best FST cut-off in children.

Acute kidney injury biomarker olfactomedin 4 predicts furosemide responsiveness

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4), a secreted glycoprotein expressed in neutrophils and stressed epithelial cells, is upregulated in loop of Henle (LOH) cells following AKI. We hypothesized that urine OLFM4 (uOLFM4) will increase in patients with AKI and may predict furosemide responsiveness.

METHODS

Urine from critically ill children was collected prospectively and tested for uOLFM4 concentrations with a Luminex immunoassay. Severe AKI was defined by KDIGO (stage 2/3) serum creatinine criteria. Furosemide responsiveness was defined as > 3 mL/kg/h of urine output in the 4 h after a 1 mg/kg IV furosemide dose administered as part of standard of care.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients contributed 178 urine samples. Irrespective of sepsis status or AKI cause, uOLFM4 concentrations were higher in patients with AKI (221 ng/mL [IQR 93-425] vs. 36 ng/mL [IQR 15-115], p = 0.007). uOLFM4 concentrations were higher in patients unresponsive to furosemide (230 ng/mL [IQR 102-534] vs. 42 ng/mL [IQR 21-161], p = 0.04). Area under the receiver operating curve for association with furosemide responsiveness was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.60-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is associated with increased uOLFM4. Higher uOLFM4 is associated with a lack of response to furosemide. Further testing is warranted to determine whether uOLFM4 could identify patients most likely to benefit from earlier escalation from diuretics to kidney replacement therapy to maintain fluid balance. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

The furosemide stress test predicts the timing of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a double-blind prospective intervention cohort study

BACKGROUND

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains a crucial treatment for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), although the timing of its initiation is still a matter of contention. Furosemide stress testing (FST) may be a practical and beneficial prediction instrument. This research was meant to examine if FST can be used to identify high-risk patients for CRRT.

METHODS

This study is a double-blind, prospective interventional cohort study. For patients with AKI receiving intensive care unit (ICU) income, FST was selected with furosemide 1 mg/kg intravenous (1.5 mg/kg intravenous if a loop diuretic was received within 7 days). Urinary volume more than 200 ml at 2 h after FST was FST-responsive, less than 200 ml was FST-nonresponsive. The FST results are kept strictly confidential from the clinician, who decides whether to initiate CRRT based on laboratory testing and clinical symptoms other than the FST data. The FST data are concealed from both the patients and the clinician.

RESULTS

FST was delivered to 187 of 241 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 48 patients responding to the test and 139 patients not responding. 18/48 (37.5%) of the FST-responsive patients received CRRT, while 124/139 (89.2%) of the FST-nonresponsive patients received CRRT. There was no significant difference between the CRRT and non-CRRT groups in terms of general health and medical history (P > 0.05). Urine volume after 2 h of FST was considerably lower in the CRRT group than in the non-CRRT group (35 ml, IQR5-143.75 versus 400 ml, IQR210-890; P = 0.000). FST non-responders were 2.379 times more likely to initiate CRRT than FST responders (95% CI 1.644-3.443, P = 0.000). The area under the curve (AUC) for initiating CRRT was 0.966 (cutoff of 156 ml, sensitivity of 94.85%, specificity of 98.04%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that FST is a safe and practical approach for predicting the initiation of CRRT in critically ill AKI patients. Trial registration www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR1800015734, Registered 17 April 2018.

The use of diagnostic tools for pediatric AKI: applying the current evidence to the bedside

Given the known deleterious consequences of acute kidney injury (AKI), exciting recent research efforts have focused on developing strategies for the earlier recognition of AKI in the pediatric population. Recognizing the limitations of serum creatinine, investigators have focused on the study of novel biomarkers and practical bedside tools for identifying patients at risk for AKI prior to a rise in serum creatinine. In PubMed, there are presently over 30 original research papers exploring the use of pediatric AKI risk prediction tools in just the last 2 years. The following review highlights the most recent advances in the literature regarding opportunities to refine our ability to detect AKI early. Importantly, this review discusses how prediction tools including novel urine and serum biomarkers, practical risk stratification tests, renal functional reserve, and electronic medical record alerts may ultimately be applied to routine clinical practice.

Risk factors and prognosis assessment for acute kidney injury: The 2020 consensus of the Taiwan AKI Task Force

Risk and prognostic factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) have been published in various studies across various populations. We aimed to explore recent advancements in and provide updated recommendations on AKI risk stratification and information about local AKI risk factors. The Taiwan Acute Kidney Injury Task Force reviewed relevant recently published literature and reached a consensus after group meetings. Systemic review and group discussion were performed. We conducted a meta-analysis according to the PRISMA statement for evaluating the diagnostic performance of the furosemide stress test. Several risk and susceptibility factors were identified through literature review. Contrast-associated AKI prediction models after coronary angiography were one of the most discussed prediction models we found. The basic approach and evaluation of patients with AKI was also discussed. Our meta-analysis found that the furosemide stress test can be used as a prognostic tool for AKI progression and to identify patients with AKI who are at low risk of renal replacement therapy. Factors associated with de novo chronic kidney injury or renal non-recovery after AKI were identified and summarized. Our review provided practical information about early identification of patients at high risk of AKI or disease progression for Taiwan local clinics.

Furosemide stress test as a predictive marker of acute kidney injury progression or renal replacement therapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

The use of the furosemide stress test (FST) as an acute kidney injury (AKI) severity marker has been described in several trials. However, the diagnostic performance of the FST in predicting AKI progression has not yet been fully discussed.

Methods

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to March 2020. The diagnostic performance of the FST (in terms of sensitivity, specificity, number of events, true positive, false positive) was extracted and evaluated.

Results

We identified eleven trials that enrolled a total of 1366 patients, including 517 patients and 1017 patients for whom the outcomes in terms of AKI stage progression and renal replacement therapy (RRT), respectively, were reported. The pooled sensitivity and specificity results of the FST for AKI progression prediction were 0.81 (95% CI 0.74–0.87) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 5.45 (95% CI 3.96–7.50), the pooled negative LR was 0.26 (95% CI 0.19–0.36), and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 29.69 (95% CI 17.00–51.85). The summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.88. The diagnostic performance of the FST in predicting AKI progression was not affected by different AKI criteria or underlying chronic kidney disease. The pooled sensitivity and specificity results of the FST for RRT prediction were 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.91) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.64–0.87), respectively. The pooled positive LR and pooled negative LR were 3.16 (95% CI 2.06–4.86) and 0.25 (95% CI 0.14–0.44), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 13.59 (95% CI 5.74–32.17), and SROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.86. The diagnostic performance of FST for RRT prediction is better in stage 1–2 AKI compared to stage 3 AKI (relative DOR 5.75, 95% CI 2.51–13.33).

Conclusion

The FST is a simple tool for the identification of AKI populations at high risk of AKI progression and the need for RRT, and the diagnostic performance of FST in RRT prediction is better in early AKI population.

Furosemide stress test and interstitial fibrosis in kidney biopsies in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial fibrosis (IF) on kidney biopsy is one of the most potent risk factors for kidney disease progression. The furosemide stress test (FST) is a validated tool that predicts the severity of acute kidney injury (especially at 2 h) in critically ill patients. Since furosemide is secreted through the kidney tubules, the response to FST represents the tubular secretory capacity. To our knowledge there is no data on the correlation between functional tubular capacity assessed by the FST with IF on kidney biopsies from patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to determine the association between urine output (UO), Furosemide Excreted Mass (FEM) and IF on kidney biopsies after a FST.

METHODS

This study included 84 patients who underwent kidney biopsy for clinical indications and a FST. The percentage of fibrosis was determined by morphometry technique and reviewed by a nephropathologist. All patients underwent a FST prior to the biopsy. Urine volume and urinary sodium were measured in addition to urine concentrations of furosemide at different times (2, 4 and 6 h). We used an established equation to determine the FEM. Values were expressed as mean, standard deviation or percentage and Pearson Correlation.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 38 years and 44% were male. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and diuretic use was significantly higher with more advanced degree of fibrosis. Nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney graft dysfunction were the most frequent indications for biopsy. eGFR was inversely related to the degree of fibrosis. Subjects with the highest degree of fibrosis (grade 3) showed a significant lower UO at first hour of the FST when compared to lower degrees of fibrosis (p = 0.015). Likewise, the total UO and the FEM was progressively lower with higher degrees of fibrosis. An inversely linear correlation between FEM and the degree of fibrosis (r = - 0.245, p = 0.02) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that interstitial fibrosis correlates with total urine output and FEM. Further studies are needed to determine if UO and FST could be a non-invasive tool to evaluate interstitial fibrosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02417883.

Furosemide Stress Test as a Predicting Biomarker for Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) could worsen early and long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT). DGF is caused by several pre-transplantation and perioperative factors in both donors and recipients. At present, there are no biomarkers or tests during the immediate post-KT period that can accurately predict the development of DGF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in deceased donor KT (DDKT) at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. All recipients underwent furosemide stress test (FST) by receiving a single dose of intravenous furosemide, 1.5 mg/kg at 3 h after allograft reperfusion. We determined the correlations between DGF (requiring dialysis within the first week after transplantation) and the values of urine volume recorded hourly after FST until 6 h, the parameters of postoperative dynamic tests, including resistive index (RI) of renal arteries and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL).

RESULTS

Of the 59 total DDKT recipients enrolled, 24 developed DGF. The FST is a more accurate biomarker than urine NGAL, RI of renal arteries, and ERPF in the prediction of DGF. The 4-h urine volume less than 350 mL (FST non-responsive) was the best cut-off value in predicting DGF with 87.5% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, and 82.5% accuracy. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed an odds ratio of 0.993 (0.986-0.999, p = 0.035) for the 4-h urine volume to predict DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

The FST is a simple and accurate biomarker for predicting DGF in early post-KT period. Close monitoring and well prepared dialysis are suggested in patients with urine volume < 350 mL after 4 h of FST. The FST non-responsive patients could be the target for further DGF preventive intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03071536.

Early versus standard initiation of renal replacement therapy in furosemide stress test non-responsive acute kidney injury patients (the FST trial)

Background

The timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in severe acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial, with early initiation resulting in unnecessary therapy for some patients while expectant therapy may delay RRT for other patients. The furosemide stress test (FST) has been shown to predict the need for RRT and therefore could be used to exclude low-risk patients from enrollment in trials of RRT timing. We conducted this multicenter pilot study to determine whether FST could be used to screen patients at high risk for RRT and to determine the feasibility of incorporating FST into a trial of early initiation of RRT.

Methods

FST was performed using intravenous furosemide (1 mg/kg in furosemide-naive patients or 1.5 mg/kg in previous furosemide users). FST-nonresponsive patients (urine output less than 200 mL in 2 h) were then randomized to early (initiation within 6 h) or standard (initiation by urgent indication) RRT.

Results

FST was completed in all patients (100%). Only 6/44 (13.6%) FST-responsive patients ultimately received RRT while 47/60 (78.3%) nonresponders randomized to standard RRT either received RRT or died (P <  0.001). Among 118 FST-nonresponsive patients, 98.3% in the early RRT arm and 75% in the standard RRT arm received RRT. The adherence to the protocol was 94.8% and 100% in the early and standard RRT group, respectively. We observed no differences in 28-day mortality (62.1 versus 58.3%, P = 0.68), 7-day fluid balance, or RRT dependence at day 28. However, hypophosphatemia occurred more frequently in the early RRT arm (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

The furosemide stress test appears to be feasible and effective in identifying patients for randomization to different RRT initiation times. Our findings should guide implementation of large-scale randomized controlled trials for the timing of RRT initiation.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02730117. Registered 6 April 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2021-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.