Association between radiotherapy protocol variations and outcome in the CONVERT trial

Background

Radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) is integral to radiotherapy delivery. Here we report comprehensive contouring, dosimetry, and treatment delivery QA, describe protocol compliance, and detail the impact of protocol variations on acute grade ≥3 toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the phase III CONVERT trial.

Materials/Methods

Radiotherapy planning data from one hundred randomly selected patients were requested. Members of the CONVERT Trial Management Group (TMG) recontoured the heart, lung, and spinal cord organs at risk (OAR) according to the trial guideline. The existing radiotherapy plan were re-applied to the new structures and the new dosimetric data were recollected. Compliance with radiotherapy QA components were recorded and radiotherapy QA components were pooled into protocol variations: acceptable, acceptable variation, and unacceptable variation. Univariable analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model established the relationship between protocol variations and patient outcome.

Results

Ninety-three cases were submitted for retrospective radiotherapy QA review. Demographics of the radiotherapy QA cohort (n=93) matched the non-QA (n=450) cohort. 97.8% of gross tumour volume (GTV) contours were protocol compliant. OAR contours were non-compliant in 79.6% instances of the heart, 37.6% lung, and 75.3% spinal cord. Of the non-compliant heart contours, 86.5% and 2.7% had contours caudal and cranial to the protocol-defined heart borders. 10.8% did not include the pericardial sac and 2.7% did not include the anterior aspect of the pericardium. Eleven (11.8%) submissions exceeded protocol-defined dosimetric heart constraints; six of which were only noted on the application of protocol-compliant contours. Unacceptable variations were not associated with an increase in grade 3 toxicity (p=0.808), PFS (p=0.232), or OS (p=0.743).

Conclusion

Non-protocol compliant heart contours were associated with increased dose delivered to the heart OAR, with 11.8 % of submitted heart structures exceeding protocol-defined constraints. In this QA cohort of patients with small cell lung cancer, unacceptable variations were not associated with acute grade ≥3 toxicity, PFS, or OS. Radiotherapy QA remains the cornerstone of high-quality radiotherapy delivery and should be embedded into clinical trial and non-clinical trial practice; clinical trials should report standardised radiotherapy QA parameters alongside trial outcomes.

Once daily (OD) versus twice-daily (BID) chemoradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

Assess Once daily (OD) chemoradiation effectiveness for LS-SCLC compared with twice daily (BID) chemoradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing OD and BID were identified on electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. A metaregression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of fractionation, biological effective dose (BED), the proportion of patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), elective nodal irradiation (ENI), and the start of radiotherapy (week 1 or week 4).

RESULTS

Five RCTs with a total of 1941 patients (OD vs. BID) were included. The relative risk (RR) for OS and PFS was 0.97 (CI95% 0.8-1.1, p = 0.731) and 0.90 (CI95% 0.7-1.1, p = 0.20) at 3-years. In the metaregression analysis, hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules were associated with an improvement in overall survival (p = 0.03). The start of radiotherapy (W1 or W4), BED, and ENI had no significant effect on OS and PFS. The complete response rate partial response and overall response rate for BID vs OD were 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.97), 50% vs. 57% (p = 0.94), and 89% vs. 93% (p = 0.99). The rate of completed planned RT 96% vs. 94% (p = 0.66), and the % of ≥4 chemotherapy cycles received 74% vs. 74% (p = 0.99), did not differ between OD and BID. The local and distant failure rates were not significantly different between OD and BID 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.88) and 36% vs. 36% (p = 0.99). No difference in grade 2 or grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis was observed among the groups (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

For LS-SCLC, OD conventional chemoradiation results in similar outcomes to BID chemoradiation. In contrast, hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with a better OS and PFS than BID. Additional randomized phase III trials exploring hypofractionation with systemic therapy are warranted to validate our findings.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts brain metastasis and survival in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a high risk of brain metastasis and poor survival. This study aims to assess the prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 197 consecutive patients who underwent TRT and PCI for LS-SCLC between November 2005 and October 2017. Both pretreatment and maximal serum LDH levels (mLDH) during treatment were checked, and an increased LDH level was defined as more than 240 IU/ml. Clinical factors were tested for associations with intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) and overall survival (OS) after PCI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify variables associated with survival.

RESULTS

Of the total patients, 28 had higher pretreatment LDH levels and mLDH levels were increased in 95 patients during treatment. In patients in the normal and elevated mLDH groups, the 1‑, 2‑, and 5‑year IPFS rates were 96.7% vs. 90.1%, 91.7% vs. 73.8%, and 87.8% vs. 61.0% (P < 0.01), respectively. Compared to those with normal LDH levels, patients with increased mLDH levels had a higher cumulative risk of intracranial metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-8.63; P < 0.01) and worse overall survival (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.67-4.04; P < 0.01). The factors LDH level at baseline or changes between pretreatment level and maximum level during treatment failed to predict brain metastases or OS with statistical significance. In the multivariate analyses, both mLDH during treatment (HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.57-7.92; P = 0.002) and patient age ≥ 60 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.22-4.94; P = 0.012) were independently associated with worse IPFS. Factors significantly associated with worse OS included mLDH during treatment (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.56-3.86; P < 0.001), IIIB stage (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.06-2.88; P = 0.029), and conventional radiotherapy applied in TRT (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.04-2.65; P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The mLDH level during treatment predicts brain metastasis and survival in LS-SCLC patients treated with TRT and PCI, which may provide valuable information for identifying patients with poor survival outcomes and possible candidates for treatment intensification.

Four cycles of R-CHOP followed by two applications of rituximab based on negative interim PET/CT: an analysis of a prospective trial

Background

R-CHOP with or without radiotherapy is the standard treatment for limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To prevent overtreatment, we assessed whether four cycles of CHOP plus six applications of rituximab was adequate with negative interim PET/CT and the role of consolidation radiotherapy specifically for patients with Waldeyer’s ring DLBCL. One hundred and twenty-nine patients with limited-stage DLBCL were enrolled in this open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01804127).

Methods

All patients were initially treated with 4 cycles of R-CHOP and underwent interim PET/CT. Patients with negative PET/CT (Deauville scores 1–2) received 2 additional cycles of rituximab monotherapy, unless they had any risk factors (primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, extranodal primary or bulky disease). Otherwise, patients received another 2 cycles of R-CHOP. Patients with partial response on interim PET/CT received another 4 cycles of R-CHOP. No radiotherapy was conducted in Waldeyer’s ring DLBCL patients with negative PET/CT. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) in this study was compared with those from a historical study (NCT 00854568159).

Results

One hundred fifteen interim PET/CT scans (89.1%) were negative after 4 cycles of R-CHOP. An elevated lactate dehydrogenase level was significantly associated with positive interim PET/CT (P < 0.05). A trend of inferior outcome was observed in patients with positive interim PET/CT in terms of 3-year PFS (78.6% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.24) and 3-year OS (85.7% vs. 95.6%, P = 0.16). There were no PFS or OS differences found between patients treated with 4R-CHOP+2R and those treated with 6R-CHOP from a historical control study. Patients with Waldeyer’s ring DLBCL and negative interim PET/CT achieved a 3-year PFS of 87.2% and a 3-year OS of 89.7%.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that for interim PET/CT-negative patients without risk factors, the extra 2 cycles of CHOP might be omitted, and radiotherapy might also be omitted in patients with Waldeyer’s ring DLBCL without compromising the efficacy. These results need to be confirmed in a randomized study.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 01804127. Date of first registration: 05/03/2013.

Update 2021: Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accounting for 14% of lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy with rapid proliferation, early spread, and poor survival.

AIM AND METHODS

We provide an overview of recent advances regarding SCLC pathogenesis, subtypes, and treatment development through literature review of key trials.

RESULTS

There are no validated biomarkers or approved targeted treatments for this overly heterogeneous disease, but recent analyses have identified some promising targets and four major subtypes which may carry unique therapeutic vulnerabilities in SCLC. Treatment wise, only a third of patients present with limited stage SCLC, which can be managed with a combined modality approach with curative intent (usually chemo-radiotherapy, but in some eligible patients, surgery followed by systemic treatment). For advanced or extensive stage SCLC, combined chemotherapy (platinum-etoposide) and immunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab during and after chemotherapy) has become the new standard front-line treatment, with modest improvement in overall survival. In the second-line setting, for disease relapse ≤ 6 months, topotecan, lurbinectedin, and clinical trials are reasonable treatment options; for disease relapse > 6 months, original regimen, topotecan or lurbinectedin can be considered. Moreover, Trilaciclib, a CD4/CD6 inhibitor, was recently FDA-approved to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-related myelosuppression in SCLC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While modest improvements in survival have been made especially in the metastatic setting with chemo-immunotherapy, further research in understanding the biology of SCLC is warranted to develop biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies and combinational approaches for this aggressive disease.

Immunotherapy era in the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is differentiated from non-small cell lung cancers with its histological and morphological features, rapid response to chemotherapy, and recurrence in a short time after treatment is discontinued. Platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy combination has been used as a standard treatment, and no new drug has been found for more than 30 years in this disease. In research, the targeted pathways that may affect survival have not been identified yet. During the second half of the second decade of the 2000s, with immunotherapies that inhibit immune checkpoints, improvements in survival were achieved for the first time in treating SCLC after many years. Then a rapid increase was observed in chemotherapy plus immunotherapy combination studies in this field. Updated analyses of these studies were represented at international oncology meetings in 2020. Here, we reviewed immunotherapy studies conducted in patients with SCLC and the reflections on the daily practice.

[A single-center retrospective analysis of 85 children and adolescents with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma]

Objective: To summarize the efficiency and long-term outcomes of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents with ABVD therapy and determined whether omitting radiotherapy for a low-risk patient enabled the achievement of complete response (CR) after chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 13 y (2004-2016) from patients aged ≤18 y with limited-stage HL admitted to the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Patients received treatment with ABVD chemotherapy alone or ABVD chemotherapy followed by low-dose involved field radiotherapy. Results: Total 85 subjects were eligible for study inclusion; the median age was 12 (3-18) y; 66 (77.6%) were men, 80 (94.1%) had stage-II disease, 56 (65.9%) were at low-risk, and the median follow-up duration was 72 (8-196) months; 12 relapsed, 2 had secondary neoplasm, and 2 died. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) was (85.6±3.8) %, and the overall survival (OS) was 100%. The 5-year EFS and OS was (89.1±4.2) % and 100%, respectively, for the low-risk cohort and (79.3±7.5) % and 100%, respectively for the intermediate-risk cohort. Among the 39 low-risk patients who achieved CR after chemotherapy, 15 received treatment with chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT. In the exploratory subset analysis, the low-risk cohort who achieved CR after chemotherapy, the 5-year EFS for comparing ABVD alone with chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT was (87.0±7.0) % versus 100% (P=0.506) , and the OS was 100% for both the groups. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis showed excellent survival of limited-stage HL patients with ABVD therapy. For patients who achieving CR after chemotherapy with low-risk HL, received chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT does not improve 5-year OS and EFS. The use of risk- and response-based stratification may facilitate the development of effective and less toxic protocols.

Long-term follow-up of abbreviated R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (CISL 12-09)

The standard of treatment for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients without residual lesions has not yet been established. Previously, we designed a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP in patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL and reported favorable survival outcomes. We present the long-term follow-up results to taking into account the importance of delayed relapse in patients with limited-stage DLBCL. With a median follow-up duration of 62.7 months (range, 60.2-75.5 months), the 5-year OS and DFS rates were both 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.59-104.11%). Only one patient experienced disease progression which was confirmed at 12.3 months, and one patient with primary intestinal DLBCL developed non-small cell lung cancer 6 years after treatment. The long-term results of our data support the use of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP for patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL. The study was reviewed and approved by the review boards of the participating institutes and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01279902, in August 3, 2010.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of limited-stage mantle cell lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma report

Limited-stage (Ann Arbor stage I or II) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an extremely rare disease. Thus, there is little data on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with early-stage MCL. We examined consecutive stage I or II MCL 41 cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 in 16 institutions of the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma group. All cases were pathologically confirmed and systemic evaluation was performed for staging. The clinical features were reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were analyzed. The median age of patients was 66 years (range 19-85 years); there were more men (n = 31, 75.6%) than women. Most patients (n = 28, 68.3%) had stage 2 disease, and 29 (70.7%) were symptomatic. The elevation of lactate dehydrogenase (n = 2, 4.9%) was not common; thus, 39 patients (95.1%) had a low-risk score (0 or 1) for the International Prognostic Index, and 28 (68.3%) had a low-risk score (1-3) for the MCL International Prognostic Index. Most patients (n = 37, 90.1%) received chemotherapy as the first therapeutic strategy, while some received radiotherapy (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 1), or no treatment (n = 1). Of the patients who received chemotherapy, 23 (56.9%) received a rituximab-containing regimen, and R-CHOP (n = 17) and R-bendamustine (n = 5) were commonly used. The best response was noted in 97.4% (n = 38) of patients, including 32 who showed a complete response (78%). With a median follow-up duration of 40.6 months, the 42 months relapse-free survival was 59.1%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 80.4%. Limited-state MCL showed indolent clinical and low-risk prognostic features. Chemotherapy could be effective for controlling localized MCL lesions, with high complete response rates.

Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies

PURPOSE

The optimal radiotherapy dose/fraction for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is undefined. Our objectives were to compare efficacy between hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; 1.5 Gy 2 times per day [bid] in 30 fractions) and hypofractionated TRT (2.5 Gy once per day [qd] in 22 fractions), and to explore prognostic factors influencing the prognosis, such as the timing of TRT.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in two independent prospective studies were combined and analyzed. The primary endpoint was local/regional control (LRC). The prognosis was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Ninety-two and 96 patients were treated with hyperfractionated TRT and hypofractionated TRT, respectively. The 1‑ and 2‑year LRC rates of the two arms were 82.1 and 60.7%, and 84.9 and 68.8% (P = 0.27), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) times (months) were 28.3 (95% confidence interval, CI 16.4-40.1) and 22.0 (95% CI 16.4-27.5), while the 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year OS rates were 85.2, 40.8, and 27.1%, and 76.9, 34.3, and 26.8% (P = 0.37), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression study, time (days) from the initiation of chemotherapy to TRT (TCT) ≤43 was associated with improved LRC (hazard radio, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76; P = 0.005). Time (days) from the start of chemotherapy to the end of TRT (SER) ≤63 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P = 0.003) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.63; P = 0.000) were favorably related to OS. Grade 2/3 acute radiation esophagitis was observed in 37.0 and 17.7% of patients in the hyperfractionated and hypofractionated arms, respectively (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Both hyperfractionated and hypofractionated TRT schedules achieved good LRC and OS for patients with limited-stage SCLC in this study. Keeping TCT ≤43 and SER ≤63 resulted in a better prognosis. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the hyperfractionated arm.

Recent developments in limited stage small cell lung cancer

Limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains a challenging disease, with 5-year overall survival ranging from 30-35% with current standard of care treatment consisting of thoracic radiation to 45 Gy in 30 fractions delivered twice daily, with concurrent platinum/etoposide chemotherapy, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). The randomized, phase III CONVERT study confirmed 45 Gy delivered twice daily to be the optimal radiation fractionation regimen, without significantly increased toxicity when compared to daily radiation to 66 Gy. Immunotherapy is now being studied in addition to chemoradiation, in both the concurrent and consolidative setting. These randomized trials are ongoing. Additionally, the role of PCI compared to MRI surveillance is being evaluated in patients with LS-SCLC in both the North America and Europe. Ideally these ongoing studies will continue to improve outcomes for LS-SCLC.

Compliance and Outcome of Elderly Patients Treated in the Concurrent Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Radiotherapy (CONVERT) Trial

Introduction

There is a lack of data on the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly, limited-stage, patients with SCLC.

Methods

We compared outcomes of patients 70 years of age or older versus younger patients within the Concurrent Once-daily Versus twice-daily RadioTherapy (CONVERT) trial. Patients were randomized to receive 45 Gy/30 twice-daily fractions/19 days or 66 Gy/33 once-daily fractions/45 days concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall survival and progression-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Of 547 patients randomized between April 2008 and November 2013, 57 did not receive protocol treatment and were excluded. Of the 490 patients included, 67 (14%) were 70 years of age or older (median age: 73 years; range: 70–82). Fewer older patients received the optimal number of radiotherapy fractions (73% versus 85%; p = 0.03); however, chemotherapy compliance was similar in both groups (p = 0.24). Neutropenia grade 3/4 occurred more frequently in the elderly (84% versus 70%; p = 0.02) but rates of neutropenic sepsis (4% versus 7%; p = 0.07) and death (3% versus 1.4%; p = 0.67) were similar in both groups. With a median follow-up of 46 months; median survival in the elderly versus younger groups was 29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21–39) versus 30 months (95% CI: 26–35), respectively; (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.84–1.59; p = 0.38). Median time to progression in the elderly versus younger groups was 18 months (95% CI: 13–31) versus 16 months (95% CI: 14–19), respectively (hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41; p = 0.81).

Conclusions

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with modern radiotherapy techniques should be a treatment option for fit, older patients.

Limited Stage Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: What Is Optimal Therapy?

OPINION STATEMENT

The seminal SWOG trial S8736 trial established the success of a short course of chemotherapy followed by involved field radiation in treating limited stage aggressive NHL lymphoma. Addition of rituximab offered a surprisingly modest improvement in this disease subset. Radioimmunotherapy could hold a slight advantage over rituximab, but that should be investigated in a randomized trial setting. The role of radiation therapy continues to be widely debated, with interpretation complicated by different trial populations, methods of assessing risk, as well as by differences in timing and dose of radiation. Prolonged course of chemotherapy followed by radiation is certainly not justified in all patients with limited stage disease. Three to four cycles of R-CHOP followed closely by IFRT/ISRT, or six cycles of R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy (based on the MInT trial) are acceptable options. PET/CT scans may further limit radiation to minority of patients who have residual PET-positive masses. PET/CT-directed treatment strategy is being tested in a US intergroup trial. There is evidence that localized DLBCL has a different biology as compared to advanced stage disease. This relates to propensity of limited stage disease to be proportionately more germinal center B-cell like (GCB) and to have late relapses beyond 5 years. Both biology and imaging need to be integrated in the study of limited stage disease without presumption that it should be approached the same as advanced stage disease.

Progress in the initial management of Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence are used to optimize therapy for patients with limited or advanced stage disease and predict their outcomes while reducing the toxicities. Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology, anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Management of localized HL has shifted from radiation alone to combined modality strategies with brief courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy. Patients with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy commonly without radiation therapy. Clinical trials are being conducted using the early interim response or response at the end of therapy as measured by PET scan to determine treatment.

Treatment outcome of limited stage Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE

The 10-year overall survival rate following conventional treatments for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) exceeds 90%. However, the clinical features and treatment outcome of HD in Korea have not been extensively characterized due to its low incidence. In this study, we attempted to analyze the treatment outcome of different modalities in limited stage HD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty one Hodgkin's disease patients, referred to the Samsung Medical Center between January 1997 and December 2003, were enrolled in this study. Limited stage Hodgkin's disease was subdivided into low and high risk groups. All evaluable patients received treatment.

RESULTS

There were 13 and 8 patients in the low and high risk groups, respectively. Eighteen patients (86%) obtained complete response (CR) and 3 patients (14%) achieved an undetermined complete response (CRu). Fourteen (67%), 4 (19%) and 3 (14%) cases received combination chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone, respectively. Four cases relapsed and 2 obtained a second CR. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 90 and 72%, respectively, for all patients. The median follow-up duration was 31 months. There was no difference in disease free survival (DFS) between the low and high risk groups. Although 12 cases had neutropenia greater than grade III, none experienced neutropenic fever.

CONCLUSION

The treatment outcome of limited-stage HD was excellent, regardless to the initial treatment modality.