Nephrotic syndrome with acute kidney injury due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis following long-term treatment with minodronate

Although bisphosphonates are well known to cause kidney disease, there are very few published cases of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) following treatment with minodronate. Here we report the case of an 86-year-old woman who developed acute kidney injury and nephrotic syndrome after receiving monthly oral minodronate for 24 months. Kidney biopsy revealed cellular variant FSGS. Treatment was initiated with the discontinuation of minodronate followed by intravenous methylprednisolone pulse and prednisolone at 35 mg/day. Subsequently, the patient's renal function gradually worsened, requiring initiation of hemodialysis. However, renal function and proteinuria improved markedly and hemodialysis was withdrawn 1 month after the initiation of steroid therapy. This is, to our knowledge, the first published case of FSGS induced by long-term use of minodronate, and also the first case of cellular variant FSGS induced by bisphosphonates although collapsing variant of FSGS is commonly caused by bisphosphonates. Our study indicates that patients on bisphosphonates should be closely monitored for proteinuria and renal impairment, regardless of the type of bisphosphonate.

Effects of risedronate, alendronate, and minodronate alone or in combination with eldecalcitol on bone mineral density, quality, and strength in ovariectomized rats

Combination therapy of active vitamin D₃ with some bisphosphonates (BPs) has been reported to be clinically beneficial. However, combination therapy of eldecalcitol (ELD) with BP has to date not been validated as to whether it is beneficial in the clinical setting. Preclinical studies suggested that simultaneous treatment with ELD and some BPs is more effective than monotherapy. However, the relative potency of various BPs, when used in combination with ELD, is completely unknown. In this study, we examined and compared the effects of risedronate (RIS), alendronate (ALN), and minodronate (MIN) alone or in combination with ELD on bone mass, microarchitecture, strength, and material properties in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats aged 13 weeks. RIS, ALN, MIN, and ELD were administered five times weekly for 16 weeks. Micro-computed tomography analysis, compression test, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) imaging analysis were performed 16 weeks after treatment initiation. Trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD) in the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) significantly increased in the RIS + ELD, ALN + ELD, and MIN + ELD groups compared with the vehicle group. Moreover, the bone microarchitecture of L4 in all the BP + ELD groups also significantly improved. On mechanical testing of L4, the maximum load was significantly increased in the RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD groups. FTIR analysis revealed that the mineral-to-collagen ratio of trabecular bone in L3 of all the BP + ELD groups was significantly increased compared with the vehicle group. By contrast, the carbonate-to-phosphate ratio, a parameter of mineral immaturity, was significantly decreased in the RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD groups. BP + ELD improved the BMD and structural properties of the bone to a similar extent. RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD also improved bone strength. Furthermore, treatment with BP + ELD improved the bone material. These results suggest that the combination therapy of BP and ELD is beneficial and warrants further clinical trials.

•

Combination of bisphosphonates and eldecalcitol was superior to either monotherapy.

•

Bone quality on FTIR imaging analysis correlated with bone strength.

•

Combined bisphosphonate and eldecalcitol may be useful in the clinical setting.

Minodronate combined with alfacalcidol versus alfacalcidol alone for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicenter, randomized, comparative study

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the clinical usefulness of minodronate (50 mg/4 weeks) plus alfacalcidol (1 μg/day) (Group M) with that of alfacalcidol alone (1 μg/day) (Group A) for treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary endpoints were the changes from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) and the cumulative incidence of vertebral fracture at 24 months; secondary endpoints included the changes from baseline in total hip (TH) BMD and bone turnover markers.

RESULTS

Of 164 patients enrolled, 152 (Group M, n = 75; Group A, n = 77) were included in the analysis of efficacy. At each time point and at 24 months, LS BMD and TH BMD were significantly higher in Group M than in Group A. The 152 patients were divided into two subgroups that were previously treated with glucocorticoids for ≤ 3 months or > 3 months. In both subgroups, the changes from baseline in LS BMD and TH BMD from baseline at 24 months had increased more in Group M than in Group A. There were no differences found in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the groups, because the number of enrolled patients was lesser than that initially expected. In Group M, both bone formation and resorption markers significantly decreased from baseline at 3 months and maintained at 6, 12, and 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Minodronate plus alfacalcidol was more effective than alfacalcidol alone in increasing BMD and was effective in increasing BMD for both prevention and treatment. Therefore, minodronate can be a good candidate drug for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Clinical effects of switching from minodronate to denosumab treatment in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective study

Background

Denosumab is a major treatment option for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, the evidence for its use is lacking. Therefore, in this 24-month retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of switching from minodronate (MIN) to denosumab in these patients.

Methods

Patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis either switched from MIN to denosumab (Group 1; n = 32) or continued MIN treatment (Group 2; n = 24). Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2–L4) and femoral neck was assessed at baseline and every 6 months for 24 months. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and N-terminal telopeptide were measured at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months.

Results

Twenty-nine of the 32 patients (90.6%) in group 1 and all patients (24/24) in group 2 completed the 24-month follow-up. Switching from MIN to denosumab (Group 1) significantly increased lumbar BMD at 12, 18, and 24 months (6.1, 7.4, and 9.6%, respectively) and femoral neck BMD at 12, 18, and 24 months (2.8, 3.2, and 3.4%, respectively), whereas MIN continuous treatment (Group 2) showed no significant difference from baseline. Switching therapy also showed a significant decrease in serum BAP from baseline to 12 and 24 months (− 19.3 and − 26.5%, respectively) and serum NTX from baseline to 12 months (− 13.1%), whereas continuous MIN treatment failed to show any significant differences from baseline.

Conclusion

Switching from MIN to denosumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis showed clinical benefits with regard to BMD and bone turnover markers in comparison with continuous MIN treatment. It may therefore be a valid treatment option in the clinical setting.

Effects of monthly minodronate with or without eldecalcitol addition in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An 18-month prospective study

Objectives

Increasing bone mineral density (BMD) to reduce fracture risk is a primary goal of osteoporosis treatment. This prospective, observational study evaluates the effects of monthly minodronate (MIN; 50 mg) with or without eldecalcitol (ELD) addition in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 18 months.

Methods

The cohort was prospectively and randomly split into the MIN monotherapy group (14 cases) and MIN plus ELD group (combination group; 14 cases) due to no reports on the effectiveness and safety of MIN therapy in relation to ELD addition for comparisons of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and BMD of the lumbar 1–4 vertebrae (L-BMD), bilateral total hips (H-BMD; the mean value of the right and left hips), and bilateral femoral necks (FN-BMD) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment.

Results

Baseline values were comparable between the groups apart from a tendency for higher TRACP-5b in the combination group. Seven of 14 patients in the combination group had received previous bisphosphonate treatment. BAP was significantly more reduced in the monotherapy group at 6 months, with no other remarkable differences for TRACP5b, L-BMD, H-BMD, or FN-BMD during the observation period.

Conclusions

The above findings suggest that regardless of ELD addition, MIN potentially improves BMD during 18 months in osteoporosis patients with RA.

Study design of multi-center, open-label randomized controlled, head-to-head trial comparing minodronic acid and raloxifene: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04

We planned to conduct multi-center, open-labeled, blinded-endpoints, head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate and raloxifene to compare incidences of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. The study is the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-4). Here, we present the pre-fixed study design. The inclusion criteria are ambulatory older women with osteoporosis, aged > 60 years, and without pre-specified risk factors for secondary osteoporosis and dementia. The subjects who meet selection criteria will be randomly allocated to the raloxifene (60 mg/day) or minodronate (1 mg/day or 50 mg/4 weeks) groups using the central registry. The co-primary endpoints are osteoporotic (vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial), vertebral, and major osteoporotic (clinical vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial) fractures. Furthermore, we plan to use the Hochberg procedure to preserve an overall type 1 error rate. In addition, changes in bone mineral density (BMD), hip-structure analysis (HSA) variables, height, bone turnover markers, serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, dental health questionnaire, fall frequency, fall risk index, nursing care level, physical function, quality of life (QOL), and safety profiles were assessed as secondary endpoints. To detect 24% reduction of major osteoporotic fractures with 80% power and a two-sided significance level of 5% with a 2-year observation period, 1734 patients/treatment arm would be required. Subgroup analysis stratified to the following factors age, body mass index, BMD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), prevalent vertebral fracture number, hypertension status, and diabetes mellitus is pre-specified. The protocol is registered in the trial registry system, and the trial identification number is UMIN000005433.

Serum homocysteine levels are affected by renal function during a 3-year period of minodronate therapy in female osteoporotic patients

Serum homocysteine is a possible marker to indicate bone quality. However, it is not clear whether changes are seen in serum homocysteine levels with long-term bisphosphonate therapy. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting serum homocysteine levels during a 3-year period of monthly minodronate therapy in osteoporotic women, and to examine if the serum homocysteine levels could reflect some aspects of bone metabolism. The study included 43 patients (age 72.3 ± 7.0 years) undergoing treatment for osteoporosis for the first time (New group) and 35 patients (age 74.4 ± 8.2 years) who switched from alendronate or risedronate to minodronate (Switch group). Minodronate (50 mg/every 4 weeks) was administered for 36 months. Lumbar, femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral densities (BMD), and serum homocysteine levels were monitored at baseline and after 9, 18, 27, and 36 months of treatment. Lumbar BMD increased significantly in both groups (New group 11.4%, Switch group 6.2%). However, femoral neck and total hip BMDs increased only in the New group (femoral neck 3.6%, total hip 4.1%). Serum homocysteine levels increased significantly at 18 and 27 months in all subjects. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that changes in homocysteine levels during 18, 27, and 36 months significantly correlated with changes in creatinine clearance during the same corresponding periods (18 months: B = - 0.472, p = 0.003; 27 months: B = - 0.375, p = 0.021; 36 months: B = - 0.445, p = 0.012). Thus, serum homocysteine levels possibly reflect renal function instead of bone metabolism during minodronate therapy.

Effects of once-monthly minodronate versus risedronate in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-month randomized head-to-head comparison

A head-to-head comparison of once-monthly oral bisphosphonates minodronate (MIN) and risedronate (RIS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrated that MIN has the same effect as RIS on increase in bone mineral density (BMD) and a stronger effect on inhibition of bone resorption than RIS, suggesting that MIN is a promising treatment option for osteoporosis patients with RA.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of once-monthly oral MIN in patients with RA, a prospective, randomized, open-label, head-to-head comparison with once-monthly oral RIS was conducted.

METHODS

A total of 83 patients with RA were randomly assigned to either once-monthly oral MIN 50 mg (n = 42) or once-monthly oral RIS 75 mg (n = 41). Serial BMD and bone turnover markers were measured and compared between the treatment groups.

RESULTS

BMD (lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck) increased significantly after 12 months of treatment with MIN (3.8, 2.0, and 2.2%, respectively, P < 0.05) and RIS (3.6, 1.9, and 1.9%, respectively, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Percent changes of bone turnover markers from baseline to 12 months in the MIN group were significantly greater than those in the RIS group (TRACP-5b: - 36.3 vs - 19.3%, P < 0.05; NTX: - 27.1 vs - 17.3%, P < 0.05; BAP: -30.2 vs -19.4%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study of RA patients demonstrated that MIN has the same effect as RIS on increase in BMD and a stronger effect on inhibition of bone resorption than RIS. The results suggest that MIN is a promising treatment option for osteoporosis patients with RA.

Patient satisfaction and efficacy of switching from weekly bisphosphonates to monthly minodronate for treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japanese patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial

The randomized, clinical trial demonstrated that switching to monthly minodronate from weekly alendronate and risedronate provides greater increases in patients' satisfaction and bone mineral density and more substantial decreases in a bone resorption marker than continuing weekly alendronate and risedronate in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis and associated fractures are major concerns for patients with systemic rheumatic diseases on long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the frequency of vertebral fractures, but they are associated with poor adherence. The effects of monthly oral minodronate on patients' satisfaction, BMD, and bone turnover markers were investigated in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoids and weekly oral alendronate or risedronate.

METHODS

Study patients with systemic rheumatic diseases on oral glucocorticoids and weekly alendronate 35 mg or risedronate 17.5 mg were randomly assigned either to switch to minodronate 50 mg every 4 weeks or to continue the currently taking weekly bisphosphonate for 52 weeks after a 24-week run-in period.Patients were stratified by hospital site, sex, and menopausal status in women at enrollment. The primary endpoint was the difference between the proportions of patients who responded very satisfactory or satisfactory for the current bisphosphonate therapy at weeks 48 and 76 between the two groups. Secondary endpoints included percentage changes in lumbar spine BMD and bone turnover markers from the time of starting allocated treatment.

RESULTS

Monthly minodronate was superior to weekly alendronate or risedronate for patients' satisfaction, the increase of lumbar spine BMD, and suppression of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b at week 76.

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly minodronate is more acceptable and may be more effective than weekly alendronate or risedronate for prevention and treatment of bone loss in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy.

Influence on the bone mineral density and bone metabolism marker after the interruption and reinitiation of monthly minodronate therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of interruption and reinitiation of monthly minodronate therapy on the bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Study patients were included if they had been administered monthly minodronate therapy for ≥6 months, interrupted the therapy, and reinitiated the therapy for ≥12 months. The BMD and bone metabolism markers were assessed at 4 time points: initiation, interruption, reinitiation and 1 year after reinitiation of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled. The mean monthly minodronate treatment period was 23.8 ± 12.9 months following a mean interruption period of 11.9 ± 5.4 months. Once increased by monthly minodronate treatment for 2 years on average, the BMD of lumbar spine and radius did not significantly decrease even after an interruption for 1 year on average. However, the BMD of the femoral neck did decrease after interruption. The BMD of the lumbar spine and radius increased further after 1 year of monthly minodronate retreatment. The BMD of the femoral neck did not change. Once decreased after the treatment for an average of 2 years followed by an interruption for 1 year, bone metabolism markers increased gradually but did not recover to baseline levels. A potent suppressive effect on bone resorption was noted. The change rate was greater for the bone formation marker procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide.

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly minodronate treatment increases BMD and reduces bone metabolism markers. The effect lessens after treatment interruptions, and can be restored by retreatment.

Effect of osteoporosis medication on changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers after 24-month administration of daily teriparatide: comparison among minodronate, raloxifene, and eldecalcitol

This study reveals the changes in bone mineral density (BMD), the turnover rate, and the balance [multiple of median formation/multiple of median resorption (MoMf/MoMr)] affected by the selection of different bone resorption inhibitors after 24-month daily teriparatide (20 µg/day) administration. The turnover rate was calculated as √(MoMf² + MoMr²), where MoMf = bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) value/18.6 and MoMr = tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) value/463. One hundred and twenty-one osteoporotic women (mean age 82.4 years) were randomly administered minodronate (50 mg/28 days), raloxifene (60 mg/day), or eldecalcitol (0.75 µg/day) after teriparatide discontinuation. BMD was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks; BAP values and TRACP-5b were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after administration of bone resorption inhibitors. In the minodronate group, BMD increased significantly from week 0 to weeks 24 and 48. The turnover rate was significantly reduced at week 12, and remained so over the entire course in all three groups. The speed of change of turnover rate was greatest in the minodronate group. The balance in the minodronate group shifted significantly toward formation dominance at week 12 (to 0.97 from 0.87) and then again toward resorption dominance (to 0.84) at week 24. However, no further advancement in resorption dominance was observed until week 48. Conversely, the balance in the raloxifene and eldecalcitol groups shifted toward resorption dominance gradually over the entire course. In conclusion, the BMD-increasing effect was greatest with minodronate administration and depends not only on the decrease in turnover rate but also on changes in balance after teriparatide discontinuation.

Effects of Teriparatide and Sequential Minodronate on Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density and Microarchitecture in Osteoporosis

The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new surrogate for trabecular bone microarchitecture assessment, independent of bone mineral density (BMD), calculated from pixel gray-level variations in the lumbar spine (LS) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) image. Although Teriparatide (TPTD) increased LS-BMD as well as TBS in 2 years, the precise time-course of these parameters was not well known. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in LS-BMD and the TBS in osteoporotic patients treated with TPTD, followed by minodronate (MINO). Primary osteoporotic patients with a low LS-BMD (T-score < -2.5) and/or at least one vertebral fracture were treated with TPTD subcutaneously at 20 µg/day for 12-24 months, followed by MINO (orally at 50 mg/once monthly) for 12 months. LS-BMD and the TBS were measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the initiation of TPTD treatment, and 12 months after the initiation of MINO. The increments of LS-BMD, significant at 6 months, increased until 12 months, whereas the increments of TBS, significant at 3 months (0.035 ± 0.011; p = 0.045 vs. the baseline), stabilized until 12 months. TPTD treatment, followed by 12 months of MINO, maintained both BMD and the TBS. Comparing the increments of the TBS to those of LS-BMD, our results indicate that TPTD treatment improved trabecular microarchitecture faster than mineralization. TPTD treatment, followed by MINO, can maintain both BMD and the TBS.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of ibandronate and minodronate combined with eldecalcitol in primary osteoporosis of women: A 1-year follow-up study

Objectives

This is an open labeled and retrospective cohort study which compared the effectiveness and safety of ibandronate (IBN) and minodronate (MIN) combined with eldecalcitol (ELD) in primary osteoporosis of women.

Methods

One hundred and forty-eight primary osteoporotic women were classified into 3 groups; 1) intravenous IBN combined with oral ELD (IBN + ELD group, N = 50; 81.8 ± 6.2 years), 2) oral MIN combined with oral ELD (MIN + ELD group, N = 50; 77.2 ± 6.9 years) and 3) oral ELD alone (ELD group, N = 48; 75.0 ± 8.3 years). For statistical analysis, lumbar spine bone mineral density (L-BMD), hip total bone mineral density (H-BMD), serum corrected calcium (Ca), serum inorganic phosphorus (iP), intact-parathyroid hormone (PTH), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum homocysteine (Hcy), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine calcium / creatinine (Ca/Cr) ratio were measured until 12 months after the start of therapy.

Results

L-BMD values increased significantly in both IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group, however, H-BMD increased significantly in the IBN + ELD group only. TRACP-5b values decreased rapidly during the first 6 months in both IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group. However, BAP value in the IBN + ELD group decreased more gradually compared with that in the MIN + ELD group. Both serum Ca value and urine Ca/Cr ratio tended to increase, and the eGFR value decreased significantly in each group.

Conclusions

IBN combined with ELD administration can act more effectively to increase BMD compared with MIN combined with ELD administration. Differences of decreasing rate in TRACP-5b and BAP value may lead to differences of increased rate of BMD in the IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group. Because many cases of osteoporosis are elderly persons associated with chronic kidney disease, monitoring of kidney function and concentration of Ca in blood and urine is essential.

Monthly minodronate inhibits bone resorption to a greater extent than does monthly risedronate

As a bisphosphonate, minodronate (MIN) is one of the strongest inhibitors of bone resorption. However, there have been no reports directly comparing the antiresorptive effects of monthly MIN with those of monthly risedronate (RIS). We enrolled 30 cases of osteoporosis (OP; 16 in the MIN group [mean age: 68.2 years] and 14 in the RIS group [mean age: 68.1 years]) to investigate the early effects of treatment by monthly MIN or RIS over a 4-month period using bone turnover marker values. Only female patients were enrolled to avoid gender bias. Urinary cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) before treatment and at 1, 2, and 4 months of therapy, as well as serum bone alkaline phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase before treatment and at 4 months afterwards, were evaluated. All bone turnover marker values were significantly decreased at 4 months in both groups. The changes in urinary NTX at the study end point for RIS and MIN were -30.1% and -63.1%, respectively. From 2 months of treatment, the antiresorptive effects on urinary NTX by MIN were significantly higher than those by RIS, indicating that MIN more immediately and strongly inhibited bone absorption. Thus, monthly MIN seems to suppress bone resorption faster and more strongly than RIS in OP treatment.

Antitumor effects of minodronate, a third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, in synergy with γδT cells in human glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), which prevent bone resorption, exert direct and γδT cell (GDT)-mediated antitumor effects against several tumor cell types, including glioblastoma (GBM). However, limited information is available regarding the antitumor effects of N-BPs in GBM. Specifically, the antitumor effects of minodronate (MDA), a third-generation N-BP, in GBM are yet unclear. This study aimed to investigate the antitumor effects of MDA in GBM in vitro and in vivo. We performed growth inhibition and apoptosis detection assays using the GBM cell lines U87MG and U138MG. Apoptosis inhibition assays were also conducted. In vivo xenograft assays were performed in highly immunodeficient NOD.Cg-Prkdc(scid) Il2rg(tm1Sug)/Jic mice subcutaneously implanted with U87MG and U138MG cells. Growth inhibition and apoptosis detection assays demonstrated that MDA inhibited GBM cell growth via apoptosis, which was markedly enhanced by ex vivo expanded GDT. A pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk, inhibited MDA-induced U138MG apoptosis and MDA/GDT-induced U87MG and U138MG apoptosis. But z-VAD-fmk increased MDA-induced U87MG apoptosis. MDA/GDT-mediated apoptosis was blocked by the anti-T cell receptor (TCR) Vγ9, mevalonate pathway inhibitor, granzyme B inhibitor, and antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. In vivo xenograft assays showed that combined intraperitoneal administration of MDA/GDT induced antitumor effects on unestablished U87MG-derived subcutaneous tumors. MDA exerted direct and GDT-mediated anti-GBM apoptotic effects in a caspase-dependent manner. GDT recognized MDA-exposed GBM cells via TCRVγ9 and induced apoptosis via granzyme B and TNF-α release. Because MDA elicited anti-GBM effects in synergy with GDT in vivo, a combination of MDA and ex vivo-generated GDT could be an effective treatment in patients with GBM.

Comparison of the effects of 12 months of monthly minodronate monotherapy and monthly minodronate combination therapy with vitamin K2 or eldecalcitol in patients with primary osteoporosis

The aim of this observational, nonrandomized study was to compare the effects of 12 months of monthly minodronate (MIN; 50 mg/month) monotherapy and MIN combination therapy with vitamin K2 (VK; 45 mg/day) or eldecalcitol (ELD; 0.75 μg/day) in treatment-naïve patients with primary osteoporosis. Patients (n = 193; 178 postmenopausal women and 15 men; mean age 71.6 years) were treated with (1) MIN monotherapy (n = 63), (2) MIN plus VK combination therapy (n = 50), or (3) MIN plus ELD combination therapy (n = 80) for 12 months. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and the levels of serum bone turnover markers were monitored. No significant difference was observed in baseline BMD among the three groups. After 12 months, BMD increased by 2.93, 4.65, and 6.55 % in the lumbar spine, 0.66, 2.57, and 3.42 % in the total hip, and 0.05, 2.06, and 3.58 % in the femoral neck in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The BMD increase induced by MIN plus ELD combination therapy was significantly greater than that induced by MIN monotherapy in the lumbar spine (P = 0.0002), total hip (P = 0.003), and femoral neck (P = 0.004), and also that induced by MIN plus VK combination therapy in the lumbar spine (P = 0.03). MIN plus ELD combination therapy compared with MIN monotherapy resulted in a greater decrease in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels (-37.4 % vs -54.6 %; P = 0.001) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels (-41.1 % vs -52.9 %; P = 0.009) at 3 months, and a greater decrease in procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels (-64.3 % vs -50.3 %; P = 0.03) and a decrease in intact parathyroid hormone levels (-12.3 % vs 14.0 %; P = 0.01) at 12 months. Combination therapy with MIN and VK or ELD for 12 months showed additive effects in decreasing the levels of bone turnover markers compared with MIN monotherapy, whereas MIN plus ELD combination therapy resulted in the highest BMD increase compared with MIN monotherapy and MIN plus VK combination therapy.

Combined treatment with minodronate and vitamin C increases bone mineral density and strength in vitamin C-deficient rats

Objectives

Reduced bone quality caused by vitamin C deficiency in older persons may lead to incidental fragility fractures during bisphosphonate treatment, although bisphosphonate increases bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of minodronate and ascorbic acid (Aa) on BMD, bone quality, and bone strength in Aa-deficient osteogenic disorder Shionogi (ODS) rats.

Methods

Six-month-old ODS rats were divided into four groups (n = 20 per group): (1) Aa supplementation (Aa⁺); (2) Aa-deficient (Aa⁻); (3) Aa supplementation and minodronate administration (Aa⁺ + Mino); and (4) Aa-deficient and minodronate administration (Aa⁻ + Mino). BMD, bone strength, bone histomorphometry, and bone quality determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy imaging (FTIRI) were evaluated after 4 and 8 weeks.

Results

BMD was significantly higher in the Aa⁺ + Mino group than in the Aa⁻ group (p < 0.05). Bone strength was significantly higher in the Aa⁺ and Aa⁺ + Mino groups than in the Aa⁻ group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, bone strength was significantly higher in the Aa⁺ + Mino group than in the Aa⁻ + Mino group (p < 0.05). Minodronate treatment irrespective of Aa supplementation significantly decreased bone resorption compared with the Aa⁺ and Aa⁻ groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the parameters evaluated by FTIRI were observed between the groups.

Conclusions

Aa supplementation improved bone strength in ODS rats. Combined treatment with minodronate and Aa, but not minodronate alone, improved bone strength and increased BMD. Aa is required for bone health because it is essential for osteoblast differentiation.

Patient preference for monthly bisphosphonate versus weekly bisphosphonate in a cluster-randomized, open-label, crossover trial: Minodroate Alendronate/Risedronate Trial in Osteoporosis (MARTO)

Minodronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that can be administered according to a monthly (every 4 weeks) dosing regimen. A 6-month, cluster-randomized, open-label, multicenter, crossover trial was conducted to test the preference of Japanese patients with osteoporosis for monthly bisphosphonate versus weekly bisphosphonate. One hundred and forty-seven patients (postmenopausal women and men) with primary osteoporosis were recruited at eight outpatient clinics. The clinics were randomized into two groups according to the dosing protocol-monthly minodronate followed by weekly alendronate or risedronate for a total of 24 weeks, or weekly alendronate or risedronate followed by monthly minodronate for 24 weeks. Patient preference for either the monthly or weekly bisphosphonate regimen was evaluated using a preference questionnaire. One hundred and fifteen patients (78.2 %) who completed the trial were processed for the analyses. Significantly more patients preferred the monthly bisphosphonate regimen (65.2 %) than the weekly bisphosphonate regimen (15.7 %) (P = 0.007). 'Dosing schedule fits lifestyle better' was the most common reason given for the patient preference for both the monthly (32.0 %) and weekly bisphosphonate (33.3 %) regimens. Significantly more patients found the monthly bisphosphonate regimen to be more convenient (73.0 %) than the weekly bisphosphonate regimen (13.9 %) (P < 0.0001). The safety profiles of the two regimens were similar. The present trial demonstrated a strong patient preference for and the convenience of the monthly bisphosphonate regimen over the weekly bisphosphonate regimen in Japanese patients with osteoporosis.