Reported Outcome Measures in Complex Fracture Elbow Dislocations: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Complex elbow fracture dislocations, dislocation with fracture of one or several surrounding bony stabilizers, are difficult to manage and associated with poor outcomes. While many studies have explored treatment strategies but a lack of standardization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) makes cross-study comparison difficult. In this systematic review, we aim to describe what injury patterns, measured outcomes, and associated complications are reported in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature to provide outcome reporting recommendations that will facilitate improved future cross-study comparison.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles published between 2010 and 2022 reporting on adult patients who had a complex elbow fracture dislocation. Pathologic fractures were excluded. A bias assessment using the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria was conducted. For each article, patient demographics, injury pattern, outcome measures, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-one studies reporting on 3664 elbows (3654 patients) with an elbow fracture and dislocation (weighted mean age 44 years, follow-up of 30 months, 41% female) were evaluated. Of these, the injury pattern was described in 3378 elbows and included 2951 (87%) terrible triad injuries and 72 (2%) transolecranon fracture-dislocations. The three most commonly reported classification systems were: Mason classification for radial head fractures, Regan and Morrey coronoid classification for coronoid fractures, and O'Driscoll classification for coronoid fractures. Range of motion was reported in 87 (96%) studies with most reporting flexion (n=70), extension (n=62), pronation (n=68), or supination (n=67). Strength was reported in 11 (12%) studies. PROMs were reported in 83 (91%) studies with an average of 2.6 outcomes per study. There were 14 outcome scores including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) (n=69 [83%]), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (n=28 [34%]), the visual analog scale for pain (VAS) (n=27 [33%]), QuickDASH score (n=13 [15.7%]), and Oxford Elbow score (n=5 [6.0%]). No significance was found between the number of PROMs used per article and the year of publication (P=.313), study type (P=.689), complex fracture pattern (P=.211), or number of elbows included (P=.152).

CONCLUSION

There is great heterogeneity in reported PROMs in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature. Although there is no gold standard PROM for assessing complex elbow fracture dislocations, we recommend the use of at least the MEPS and DASH outcomes measures as well as VAS pain rating scale in future studies to facilitate cross-study comparisons.

"Mother and baby plate": a strategy to improve stability in proximal fractures of the ulna

INTRODUCTION

Proximal ulna fractures with a large zone of comminution, such as in the context of Monteggia injuries, require mechanically strong osteosyntheses as they occur in regions with high physiological joint load. Consequently, implant failure and pseudarthrosis are critical and devastating complications, especially with the background of mainly young patients being affected. An effective solution could be provided by adding a small second plate 90° angulated to the standard dorsal plate in the area of non-union. Thus, this study investigates whether, from a biomechanical point of view, the use of such a mini or baby plate is worthwhile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comminuted fractures distal to the coronoid process, equivalent to Jupiter type IIb fractures, are generated on artificial Sawbones® of the ulna and stabilized using two different plate osteosyntheses: in the first group, a dorsal locking compression olecranon plate is used (LCP group). In the second group, a small, ulnar 5-hole olecranon plate is added as a baby plate in addition to the mother plate at the level of the fracture zone (MBP group). Dynamic biomechanical loading in degrees of flexion from 0° to 90° is carried out to determine yield load, stiffness, displacement, and changes in fracture gap width as well as bending of the dorsal plate.

RESULTS

The "mother-baby-plate" osteosynthesis had a significantly higher yield load (p < 0.01) and stiffness (p = 0.01) than the LCP group. This correlates with the increased movement of the proximal fracture element during cyclic testing for the LCP group compared to the MBP group as measured by an optical metrology system.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we show evidence that the addition of a small plate to the standard plate is highly effective in increasing the biomechanical stability in severe fractures equivalent to Jupiter type IIb. As it hopefully minimizes complications like pseudarthrosis and implant failure and as the additional preparatory effort leading to compromised blood supply is regarded to be negligible, this justifies and highly advises the use of a mother-baby-plate system.

[Clinical results of total elbow arthroplasty after treatment failure for Monteggia-like injuries]

BACKGROUND

Monteggia-like fractures (MLF) are complex injuries with high complication rates and frequently unsatisfying clinical results. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) represents the only option to salvage the functional requirements in some patients with pronounced posttraumatic arthropathy. This case series provides clinical results of TEA following failed treatment of MLF.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEA from 2017 to 2022 for failed treatment of MLF were retrospectively included in this study. Complications and revisions before and after TEA and functional results, measured by the Broberg/Morrey score, were evaluated.

RESULTS

In this study 9 patients with a mean age of 68 (±7; 54-79) years were included. The mean follow-up was 12 (±9; 2-27) months. The main reasons leading to posttraumatic arthropathy were chronic infections (44.4%), bony instability due to coronoid deficiency (33.3%) or a combined coronoid and radial head deficiency (22.2%) and non-union of the proximal ulna with radial head necrosis (11.1%). The mean number of surgical revisions between primary fixation and TEA was 2.7 (±1.8; 0-6). The revision rate following TEA was 44%. The mean Broberg/Morrey score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83 (±10; 71-97) points.

CONCLUSION

Chronic infection and coronoid deficiency are the main reasons for posttraumatic arthropathy after MLF leading to TEA. While the overall clinical results are satisfying, the indications should be reserved for selected cases due to high revision rates.

Old Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation Treated with Plating and Forearm Fascial Slip Annular Ligament Reconstruction: A Rare Method of Treatment and Review of Literature

Introduction

Chronic radial head dislocation in old standing or neglected Monteggia fracture is a devastating complication. We present our case regarding managing such a case using plating and fascial slip annular ligament reconstruction (ALR).

Case Report

A 40-year-old male patient, farmer by profession presented with a 4-month-old neglected Monteggia fracture. He was treated with open reduction and internal fixation of fracture ulna with ALR using forearm deep fascial slip. The patient underwent regular physiotherapy post-operatively after 2 weeks of surgery. The patient was followed for 6 months, and DASH score was used to evaluate functional outcome.

Conclusion

Excellent results were obtained as regards to pain, wrist range of motion, fracture union, and resuming routine activities at the follow-ups.

Ultrasound imaging in diagnostics of Monteggia lesion in children

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of ultrasound imaging in diagnostics of Monteggia lesion in children where conventional radiographs and the use of the radiocapitellar line fail to provide an accurate diagnosis.

METHODS

Prospective diagnostic study of 70 patients treated between May 2018 and July 2021 in a pediatric level 1 trauma center. In 20 patients with the confirmed radiographic diagnosis of Monteggia lesion, an ultrasound of the humeroradial joint was performed to determine signs of both normal and dislocated elbow joint. In 36 patients with suspected humeroradial dislocation on plain radiographs, ultrasound imaging was performed to determine the definitive diagnosis. Overall, 14 patients with elbow joint injury other than humeroradial dislocation were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The "double-hump sign" and the "congruency sign" were determined as normal findings on ultrasound of the humeroradial joint. These signs were applied to patients with unclear findings on radiographs. In three patients, the dislocation of the humeroradial joint was confirmed by ultrasound. In two patients, "defect in congruency sign" was seen during reduction despite normal radiographs, which required re-reduction. In 31 patients, dislocation of the humeroradial joint was refuted. In 34 out of the 36 patients, the diagnosis determined by ultrasound was confirmed in follow-up. Two patients did not attend the follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound imaging is an accessible, non-invasive, and dynamic point-of-care method that can be applied in children suffering from suspected humeroradial dislocation and/or subluxation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic study.

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture Outcome Assessment - Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

The term Monteggia fracture refers to a class of injuries encompassing the fracture of the proximal end of the ulna with subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. These injuries account for 0.4-1% of all forearm fractures in children. Despite its low incidence, Monteggia fractures require particular attention, since as much as 30-50% of the cases may be unrecognized, which subsequently leads to complications. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate treatment outcomes of Monteggia fractures in children. Both conservative treatment and surgery were analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

15 children (7 boys and 8 girls) between the ages of 4-16.3 years (mean age 8.3 years) with Monteggia fractures were hospitalized at our center in the years 2015-2020. Closed reduction and immobilization in a cast were performed in 12 patients, while three children underwent surgical treatment with internal fixation of the ulna. The radial head dislocation was reduced successfully in every patient.

RESULTS

Every child from the study group who received conservative treatment regained full elbow mobility as well as normal forearm supination and pronation. Only one of the patients who underwent the surgery demonstrated a 20° deficit in elbow flexion that did not affect limb function.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Our experience shows that closed reduction together with immobilization in a cast is usually a sufficient treatment in Monteggia fractures. 2. However, the dislocated radial head should be properly reduced in all patients. 3. Correct diagnosis and treatment followed by appropriate rehabilitation result in full recovery and no mobility limitations in children and teenagers.

Use of an external fixator during one-step surgical management of missed chronic Monteggia injuries

The incidence of untreated Monteggia fracture-dislocations is not insignificant. But there is no consensus as to the surgical indication and best surgical technique to use. Single-stage reduction of the radial head through an elbow arthrotomy and ulnar osteotomy is a complex surgical procedure that requires stabilization of the ulnar segments during every step of the intervention. Here, we describe the possibility of using an external fixator intraoperatively to facilitate the various steps of the procedure: (1) gradual distraction and angulation of the osteotomy site to allow thorough excision of any interposed capsular tissue, (2) stable hold on the ulnar fragments independent of the surgical assistant, which allows the stability of the radial head reduction to be tested in pronation and supination and (3) facilitation of plate fixation at the ulnar osteotomy site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case series.

The role of biceps loading and muscle activation on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: An in vitro biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

Little evidence-based information is available to direct the optimal rehabilitation of patients with anterior Monteggia injuries.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aims of this biomechanical investigation were to (1) quantify the effect of biceps loading and (2) to compare the effect of simulated active and passive elbow flexion on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical study.

METHODS

Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. The effect of biceps loading, simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions was examined with application of 0N, 20N, 40N, 60N, 80N, and 100N of load. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions were then performed with the forearm supinated. Radial head translation relative to the capitellum was measured using an optical tracking system. After testing the intact elbows, the proximal ulna was osteotomized and realigned using a custom jig to simulate an anatomical reduction. We then sequentially sectioned the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane to simulate soft tissue injuries commonly associated with anterior Monteggia fractures.

RESULTS

Greater magnitudes of biceps loading significantly increased anterior radial head translation. However, there was no significant difference in radial head translation between simulated active and passive elbow flexion except in the final stage of soft tissue sectioning. There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with progressive injury states with both isometric biceps loading and simulated active and passive motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that anatomic reduction of the ulna may not be sufficient to restore radial head alignment in anterior Monteggia injuries with a greater magnitude of soft tissue injury. In cases with significant soft tissue injury, the elbow should be immobilized in a flexed and supinated position to allow relaxation of the biceps and avoid movement of the elbow in the early postoperative period.

Surgical Management of Complex Adult Monteggia Fractures

Monteggia fractures classically involve a proximal ulna fracture with an associated radial head dislocation. The presence of radial head/neck fracture and comminution of the proximal ulna with coronoid involvement elevates the complexity of surgical reconstruction considerably. The Jupiter classification captures this injury pattern as a subgroup of Bado posterior Monteggia lesions. Access to the critical coronoid fragment can be problematic from the posterior approach and may result in tenuous reduction and fixation, directly affecting the functional outcome. Multiple operative techniques have been described to address the broad spectrum of injuries seen in Monteggia fractures. This article will cover commonly used fixation techniques for Monteggia fractures with a comprehensive literature review, including technical tips, outcomes, and complications.

Adult Bado type I Monteggia fracture dislocation: A case report

Introduction

Fractures of the proximal ulnar shaft accompanied by dislocation of the radial head have been described as “Monteggia fracture-dislocations,” since the early nineteenth century. In 1967 Bado further classified these Monteggia fractures into four subtypes, based largely on the direction of the radial head dislocation (Bado, 1967). Despite being frequently discussed in the literature, Monteggia fracture dislocations are rare and represent only 0.7% of elbow fracture-dislocations in adults (Papaioannou et al., 2018). In adults, Bado type I lesions, where the radial head is displaced anteriorly are rarer still, and few cases have been reported in the literature (Papaioannou et al., 2018; Suarez et al., 2016; Egol et al., 2005; Saidi et al., 2018; Wong et al., 2015).

Case presentation

We present here the case of a 55-year-old male presenting with a Bado type I Monteggia fracture dislocation, resulting from direct trauma to the posterior ulnar surface of his arm. He was treated with ORIF five days after the injury, and by hospital discharge had had 75% active range of motion of his elbow to flexion and extension.

Conclusion

We present this case of a rare adult fracture subtype with a unique mechanism to add to a paucity of existing literature on such cases and the approach to their care. These fracture-dislocations can be easy to miss because the radial dislocation can be subtle and overshadowed by the more obvious ulnar fracture. This case report hopes to contribute to the expedient recognition of this fracture dislocation syndrome, which is crucial to the preservation of range of motion and arm function for these patients.

Step-cut osteotomy in neglected Monteggia fracture dislocation in pediatric and adolescent patients: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Neglected Monteggia fracture dislocation in children leads to significant restriction of daily activities by causing decreased range of motion at elbow, stiffness, deformity, and neurological compromise. Various treatment strategies have been described in the literature and one of them is ulnar osteotomy combined with reduction of radial head and annular ligament reconstruction.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of step-cut osteotomy without the use of bone grafting with reconstruction of annular ligament in the management of neglected Monteggia fracture dislocation in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in six patients with neglected Monteggia fracture dislocation with a mean age of 8.83 years. The median interval between the original injury and the corrective surgery for 6 patients was 4.4 months (range 1-12 months). All children underwent step-cut osteotomy of ulna, open reduction of radial head, and annular ligament reconstruction. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score was used for evaluation.

RESULTS

The ulnar osteotomies healed uneventfully without the need for a bone graft. Elbow range of motion improved post-op along with improved elbow functioning as indicated by raised MEPI score. The MEPI score was excellent in 5 cases and fair in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

Step-cut osteotomy alone without the use of bone grafting and reinforcement with annular ligament repair is a simple yet effective technique for treating neglected Monteggia fracture dislocation.

Combined simple elbow dislocation and forearm joint injuries. A systematic review of the literature with injury patterns and current treatment rationale

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have allowed a great improvement in understanding elbow and forearm traumatic injuries. Simple elbow dislocations combined with forearm injuries have been occasionally reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to detect the possible patterns of simple elbow dislocations and forearm fracture-dislocations, providing a classification scheme to guide surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed search was performed to find combination of simple elbow dislocation and forearm joint injury, between 2000 and 2020, including clinical studies and case report. All articles related to pediatric patient or with complex elbow dislocation were excluded. After identification, articles were analyzed for the description of injury patterns reported according to locker-based classification system of forearm joint injuries.

RESULTS

Finally, 15 articles were included. Most of the patients sustained high-energy trauma. According to locker-based classification system, simple elbow dislocation was combined with: MRUJ and DRUJ Galeazzi injury (2IR.3), PRUJ and MRUJ injury (1.2I), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with radial shaft fracture (1.2IR), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with ulnar shaft fracture (1.2 IU), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with radial and ulnar shaft fracture (1.2IRU), PRUJ MRUJ DRUJ Essex-Lopresti injury (1.2I.3), and PRUJ MRUJ DRUJ injury with radial shaft fracture (1.2IR.3). Thirteen out of 15 patients undergo surgical treatment. Clinical results were overall favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple elbow dislocation combined with forearm joint injury is an uncommon traumatic pattern usually secondary to high-energy trauma. A thorough knowledge of elbow and forearm biomechanics, and classification of anatomical lesion is mandatory for a successful treatment.

The Three Step Approach to the management of acute pediatric Monteggia lesions

BACKGROUND

The literature places the occurrence of paediatric Monteggia lesions between 1.5% and 3% of all childhood elbow injuries. There are circumstances, which may make early correct diagnosis difficult. Failure to make an early correct diagnosis may have catastrophic consequences on joint range of motion in the chronic stage. The goal of this paper is to describe our three-step approach to the treatment of acute Monteggia lesions based on the stability and radiological appearance of the fracture dislocation, to give an overview of possible pitfalls and clinical and radiological signs that aid the diagnostic process.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 23 patients treated for this type of injury at our Department over a period of 6 years was performed. Treatment options were 1. Closed reduction under image intensifier followed by immobilization in over the elbow cast, 2. Open reduction and intramedullary nailing with ESIN, or 3. Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis. Average follow-up was 37 months. In our Department we aim for definitive treatment of fracture-dislocations in children within the acute setting. In the 23 acute cases, the selected procedure-reduction+casting/reduction+ESIN/reduction+plating - was performed within 2 to 16 h of arrival. 10 patients were treated with reduction+casting, 10 with reduction+ESIN and 3 with reduction+plating.

RESULTS

21 patients were available for long-term follow-up. No nerve or tendon injuries or infections were observed in these cases. By managing the patients with the Three Step Method retaining the reduction was successful in all but one of our acute cases in the study period. Excellent range of motion was observed in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Three Step Method allows for primary definitive treatment of these lesions with low complication rates and good range of motion result. Implementing the three step method in the acute phase helps avoid catastrophic consequences on joint range of motion in the chronic stage.

Fracture-dislocations of the forearm joint: a systematic review of the literature and a comprehensive locker-based classification system

BACKGROUND

Monteggia, Galeazzi, and Essex-Lopresti injuries are the most common types of fracture-dislocation of the forearm. Uncommon variants and rare traumatic patterns of forearm fracture-dislocations have sometimes been reported in literature. In this study we systematically review the literature to identify and classify all cases of forearm joint injury pattern according to the forearm joint and three-locker concepts.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was performed based on major pathological conditions involving fracture-dislocation of the forearm. Essex-Lopresti injury, Monteggia and Galeazzi fracture-dislocations, and proximal and/or distal radioulnar joint dislocations were sought. After article retrieval, the types of forearm lesion were classified using the following numerical algorithm: proximal forearm joint 1 [including proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) dislocation with or without radial head fractures], middle radioulnar joint 2, if concomitant radial fracture R, if concomitant interosseous membrane rupture I, if concomitant ulnar fracture U, and distal radioulnar joint 3 [including distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation with or without distal radial fractures].

RESULTS

Eighty hundred eighty-four articles were identified through PubMed, and after bibliographic research, duplication removal, and study screening, 462 articles were selected. According to exclusion criteria, 44 full-text articles describing atypical forearm fracture-dislocation were included. Three historical reviews were added separately to the process. We detected rare patterns of two-locker injuries, sometimes referred to using improper terms of variant or equivalent types of Monteggia and Galeazzi injuries. Furthermore, we identified a group of three-locker injuries, other than Essex-Lopresti, associated with ulnar and/or radial shaft fracture causing longitudinal instability. In addition to fracture-dislocations commonly referred to using historical eponyms (Monteggia, Galeazzi, and Essex-Lopresti), our classification system, to the best of the authors' knowledge, allowed us to include all types of dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the forearm joint reported in literature. According to this classification, and similarly to that of the elbow, we could distinguish between simple dislocations and complex dislocations (fracture-dislocations) of the forearm joint.

CONCLUSIONS

All injury patterns may be previously identified using an alphanumeric code. This might avoid confusion in forearm fracture-dislocations nomenclature and help surgeons with detection of lesions, guiding surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Problems of Eponymous Proportions: The History Behind Recognizing Forearm Instability Issues

Three predictable patterns of forearm fracture-dislocation-Essex-Lopresti, Monteggia, and Galeazzi-can occur and are eponymously labeled for the investigators who appreciated their unique characteristics and offered a framework by which to understand them. Recognition of these injuries and subsequent investigation and increased understanding of these lesions have resulted in improved understanding about forearm anatomy and stability. Management of the component of instability differs based on the type of fracture-dislocation, the timing of intervention, and surgeon preference. Despite advances in understanding and treating these injuries, nuances of these lesions may remain challenging to modern-day surgeons.

Neglected Monteggia Fracture Dislocations in Children: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Monteggia fracture dislocations are a relatively rare entity and they represent less than 2% of forearm fractures, the diagnosis can be missed in up to 50% of the time. The gold standard of treatment in adults has been open reduction and internal fixation, and closed reduction and cast immobilization in pediatrics.

CASE REPORT

We present three cases series of neglected Monteggia fractures in a 5-, 4-, and 9-year-old patients. The patients presented 10, 20, and 25 days post-injury, respectively. Each case was treated differently with the last case requiring open reduction and annular ligament reconstruction. All the three cases showed excellent results on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

To avoid missing these injuries, each patient should undergo a comprehensive clinical approach and adequate radiological imaging. Various treatment methods exist for neglected Monteggia fracture and each option should be exhausted to salvage the radial head starting with the less invasive approaches.

Effect of ulnar angulation and soft tissue sectioning on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: an in vitro biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Radial head instability continues to be a challenge in the management of anterior Monteggia injuries; however, there is a paucity of literature on the factors that contribute to this instability. The aim of this biomechanical investigation was to examine the effects of ulnar angulation and soft tissue insufficiency on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries.

METHODS

Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. Radial head translation was measured during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm supinated. After testing the elbows in the intact state, the ulna was osteotomized and tested at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° of extension angulation. To examine the effect of soft tissue insufficiency, the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane (IOM) were sequentially sectioned.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with greater ulnar extension angulation. Sequential soft tissue sectioning also significantly increased anterior radial head translation. There was no increase in radial head translation with isolated sectioning of the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule. Additional sectioning of the annular ligament and quadrate ligament slightly increased anterior radial head translation but did not reach statistical significance. Subsequent sectioning of the proximal and middle IOM resulted in significant increases in anterior radial head translation.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that progressive ulnar extension angulation results in an incremental increase in anterior radial head translation in anterior Monteggia injuries. Moreover, increasing magnitudes of soft tissue disruption result in greater anterior radial head instability.

Monteggia-like lesions in adults treated with radial head arthroplasty-mid-term follow-up of 27 cases

Background

The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and radiological outcome of Monteggia-like lesions in adults with unreconstructible fracture of the radial head and treatment with radial head arthroplasty.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients (mean age 56 years; range 36 to 79 years) with a Monteggia-like lesion and treatment with radial head replacement were included in this retrospective study. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Clinical assessment included the pain level with the visual analog scale in rest (VAS_R) and under pressure (VAS_P), range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH). A detailed radiological evaluation was performed. Complications and revisions were also analyzed.

Results

After a mean follow-up period of 69 months (range, 24 to 170) the mean DASH score was 30 ± 24, the MEPS averaged 77 ± 20 points, the mean VAS_R was 2.1 ± 2.4, and VAS_P was 4.5 ± 3.5. Mean loss of extension was 24° ± 18 and flexion was 124° ± 20. Heterotopic ossifications were noted in 12 patients (44%). A total of 17 complications were noted in 11 patients (41%), leading to 15 revision surgeries in 9 patients (33%). Patients with a complicated postoperative course showed a worse clinical outcome compared with patients without complications measured by MEPS (68 ± 22 vs. 84 ± 16), DASH (49 ± 16 vs. 20 ± 22) and ulnohumeral motion (77° ± 31 vs. 117° ± 23).

Conclusions

Monteggia-like lesions with unreconstructible radial head fracture and treatment with radial head replacement are prone to complications and revisions.

The Emergent Evaluation and Treatment of Elbow and Forearm Injuries

This article provides an updated review of the emergent evalution and treatment of elbow and forearm injuries in the emergency department. Clinically necessary imaging is discussed. Common and uncommon injuries of the elbow and forearm are reviewed with an emphasis on early recognition, efficient management, and avoidance of complications. The astute emergency physician will rely on a focused history and precise examination, applied anatomic knowledge, and strong radiographic interpretative skills to avoid missed injuries and complications.

Evolution of the Ring Concept for the Forearm and Its Implication on Treatment: From Galeazzi, Monteggia, Essex-Lopresti, and Darrach to the Current Era

Geometrically, rings distribute their stress along their arc instead of concentrating at any one point. The forearm ring is composed of the radius, ulna, proximal radioulnar joint, and distal radioulnar joint. The annular ligament, interosseous membrane, and triangular fibrocartilage complex link and stabilize the ring. Injuries to the forearm occur along a continuum with recognized patterns of ring disruption, including Galeazzi, Monteggia, and Essex-Lopresti injuries. The Darrach procedure causes a disruption to the forearm ring and can lead to painful convergence between the radius and distal ulnar stump. Injuries to the forearm ring are unstable. Management of forearm injuries is centered on the restoration of the anatomy and stability of the forearm ring. Forearm ring injuries and their treatment are discussed in this article.

An Unreported Variant of Convergent Dislocation of Elbow

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric traumatic elbow dislocation is an uncommon injury accounting for 3-% of all pediatric elbow injuries. It can present as an isolated injury or in association with fractures of radius, ulna, or humerus. Posterolateral type is the most common accounting for 70% of all pediatric elbow dislocations. Other less common types are anterior, medial, lateral, convergent, and divergent dislocations. We describe an unreported variant of convergent elbow dislocation.

CASE REPORT

This is the case report of a convergent elbow dislocation with a radial neck fracture and proximal ulna fracture with ulnar nerve paresthesia in an 11-year-old boy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report with these concomitant injuries.

CONCLUSION

The current case shows stepwise approach to this variety of injury where anatomical reduction of both ulnar and radial fractures was required to achieve a good range of motion at the elbow and forearm at the long term.

[Simple repair of Monteggia fractures in the cat]

INTRODUCTION

Monteggia fractures are rare traumatic injuries in cats and dogs. Ulna repair is mostly achieved by plates. Stable radial head fixation however is challenging. Temporary position screws have to be removed due to rotation forces in the elbow joint causing screw loosening. We present a novel and simple method using a sling technique, which holds the radial head in its physiological position and allows normal elbow movement.

Rehabilitation of neglected Monteggia fracture: Dislocations in children

PURPOSE

There are limited studies related to the rehabilitation of neglected Monteggia fracture-dislocations. This study reports the results of the rehabilitation of neglected Monteggia fractures and dislocations and the best treatment options available.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirteen children were rehabilitated between 2009 and 2012. A retrospective chart review was conducted to record the following: age, gender, anatomic region of fractures, time delay from symptom onset to fracture, Bado classification, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) which includes pain, range of motion and daily life comfort, surgeries, length of hospitalization, location and pattern of fracture, length of follow-up and complications.

RESULTS

The study group included thirteen children and adolescents; eleven males and two females with a mean age of 8.5 (range 2-15) years. According to the Bado classification, 11 patients had type 1, one had type 3 and one had type 4 fracture-dislocations. For Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scales, patients that were less than ten years old had greater mean scores. Two patients had superficial infection, one had subluxation, one had osteoarthritis, one had delayed bone union and two had rigidity at the elbow.

CONCLUSION

The goals of elbow rehabilitation following Neglected Monteggia cases include restoring function by restoring motion and muscle performance; influencing scar remodeling and preventing joint contracture; and restoring or maintaining joint stability. Patients aged younger than 10 years and intervals of less than one-year, between trauma and diagnosis, as well as early and effective rehabilitation were found as important parameters regarding favorable outcomes.

[Type III Monteggia lesion: a rare association, about a case]

La lesion Monteggia du groupe III est une lésion très rare, elle survient généralement dans un contexte de traumatisme violent et passe souvent inaperçue. Nous rapportons le cas d’un garçon de 11 ans qui s’est présenté aux urgences pour un traumatisme fermé du membre supérieur, et chez qui le bilan radiologique a objectivé une fracture de l’olécrâne et décollement épiphysaire du radius avec luxation de la tête radiale, le patient a bénéficié d’un traitement orthopédique avec une bonne évolution après 3 mois de recul.

Patient specific pointer tool for corrective osteotomy: Quality of symmetry based planning and case study of ulnar reconstruction surgery

Malunion after forearm fractures are described to appear in 2% to 10% of cases. Reconstructive surgeries ensure adequate anatomical repositioning. Their importance derives from the fact that malunion can often lead to severe pain as well as deformities causing loss of function and aesthetic issues not only in the forearm, but also the wrist and elbow joint. In this paper a clinical case will be presented using a Patient Specific Instrument (PSI) as navigational aid for reconstructive surgery after malunion of a proximal ulnar fracture combined with allograft surgery of the radial head and radial condyle due to chronic traumatic radial head luxation (Monteggia fracture). A planning method based on symmetry is described and evaluated on twelve Computed Tomographic (CT) data sets of intact forearms. The absolute point to point deviation at distal end of the ulnar styloid process was used as a characteristic value for accuracy evaluation. It is 7.9±4.9mm when using only the proximal end of the ulna for registration. The simulated change of ulnar variance is -1.4±1.9mm. Design and concept of the PSI are proven in a clinical trial.

Involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch in elbow fracture dislocations

BACKGROUND

This study addressed the primary null hypothesis that there is no difference in the articular surface area of the lesser sigmoid notch involved among Mayo classes. Secondarily, we analyzed the fracture line location and the pattern of lesser sigmoid notch articular surface involvement among Mayo classes.

METHODS

Using quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography, we reconstructed and analyzed fractures involving the lesser sigmoid notch articular surface in 52 patients. Further, we assessed the surface area involved in the fracture, the number of fracture fragments, and the location and direction of the fracture lines. Coronoid fractures were classified according to Mayo types.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between Mayo types 1 and 2 in any characteristic of the involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch articular surface, whereas Mayo type 3 was significantly different from both Mayo types 1 and 2 in the area involved in the fracture (42% in Mayo type 3 vs. 9% in Mayo types 1 and 2), the number of articular fragments (>3 fragments in type 3 vs. 2 fragments in types 1 and 2), and the direction of fracture line (both horizontal and vertical lines in type 3 vs. only horizontal line in types 1 and 2).

CONCLUSION

Mayo type III results in a more complex fracture, which might need to be addressed directly or indirectly during open reduction with internal fixation of olecranon fracture dislocations because changes in the geometry of lesser sigmoid notch may affect the radioulnar joint if it remains incongruent.

Adult Monteggia and Olecranon Fracture Dislocations of the Elbow

Monteggia fractures and olecranon fracture dislocations represent complex injuries with distinct patterns of bony and soft tissue involvement. Fractures of the proximal ulna and olecranon process may lead to disruption of the proximal radioulnar joint and/or ulnohumeral joint. The keys to treatment are recognition of the pattern of injury and formation of an algorithmic surgical plan to address all components of the injury process. Complications are common and may be related to the injury spectrum itself and/or inadequate fracture alignment or fixation.

Management of complications of forearm fractures

Forearm fractures may be complicated by the disruption of the distal radioulnar, proximal radioulnar, or radiocapitellar joints. The key principles in treating this unique subset of fractures include early recognition and management of the injury and restoration and maintenance of the anatomic alignment. This articles addresses radial diaphyseal fractures with distal radioulnar joint disruption, proximal ulnar fractures with radiocapitellar disruption, and disruption of the forearm longitudinal axis and how to properly recognize and manage these forearm fracture-dislocations.

Proximal ulnar fractures in adults: a review of 163 cases

The aim of this study was to report the epidemiological characteristics and the experience of 5 departments of trauma, in France, in the management of fractures of the proximal ulna. 163 patients with fractures of the proximal ulna with a mean age of 49.9 years (range 16-97) were managed. The most common mode of injury was a motor vehicle collision (48%). 18% sustained associated injuries to the ipsilateral limb. Open fractures were present in 42 patients (25%). A total of 109 patients had a fracture of the olecranon, with the Mayo 2A and B types most frequently seen (66%). The patients were invited for clinical examination at a mean duration of 16 months, retrospectively. Validated patient-oriented assessment scores involving the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Broberg and Morrey score were evaluated. All patients had follow-up radiographs. The mean arc of elbow motion was 130° (70-150°). The mean MEPI was 91 (20-100) with good results in 23% and excellent results in 52% of the patients. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 90 after isolated olecranon fracture, and decreased with the complexity of the lesion. 117 fractures (72%) healed with ulnohumeral congruity. 9 fracture non-unions occurred (6%). Although the fracture of the proximal ulna can be described in several classifications, none of them accommodate it satisfactorily, because of the complexity of the lesion. The coronoid process is the keystone for the stability of the elbow. It forms the anterior buttress with the radial head. Tension band wire fixation is by far the commonest technique of internal fixation used for the treatment of non-comminuted olecranon fractures. Dorsal plate fixation is a useful option by providing improved fixation of complex comminuted fractures and fracture-dislocations. The radiocapitellar joint has to be restored appropriately, preserving the radial head when possible and replacing it with a prosthesis otherwise. The lateral collateral ligament complex is commonly disrupted and usually can be reattached to its origin from the lateral epicondyle. In addition, a brief period of hinged external fixation should be considered.

Percutaneous reduction and flexible intramedullary nailing for monteggia fracture in a skeletally mature patient

INTRODUCTION

Monteggia lesions are defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna with an associated radial head dislocation. Management of these injuries varies depending upon the patient population, ranging from non-operative treatment with closed reduction and immobilization to surgical fixation. Percutaneous techniques of radial head reduction are often reserved for skeletally immature patients.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

In this case report, a 14-year-old female presented with left elbow pain three days after a fall. Radiographs and CT images from an outside hospital revealed a displaced left radial head fracture and a non-displaced proximal olecranon fracture, consistent with a Monteggia equivalent fracture. The patient underwent percutaneous reduction and internal fixation of the radial head with a flexible intramedullary nail (Metaizeau technique), and open reduction and internal fixation of the olecranon. She developed a 25 degree left elbow flexion contracture and, five months after her index procedure, underwent arthroscopic release and removal of hardware. The radial head reduction was near anatomic and she regained full extension.

DISCUSSION

This report demonstrates that percutaneous reduction with intramedullary nailing and fixation techniques can be performed successfully in skeletally mature patients.

CONCLUSION

Given their less invasive nature, we recommend attempting percutaneous interventions in some skeletally mature individuals for fracture reduction and fixation.

Proximal ulnar osteotomy in the treatment of neglected childhood Monteggia lesion

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to analyze medium and long-term results of proximal ulnar osteotomy with and without ligament injury in neglected Monteggia injury in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included 28 patients. Clinical criteria concerned the range of motion, pain and MEPI score, and radiologic criteria comprised of Storen line, head-neck ratio, radial neck angle, and signs of osteoarthritic remodeling.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were reviewed, at a mean 6 years' follow-up (range, 2-34y). Sixteen had proximal ulnar osteotomy without ligament reconstruction, and 12 had associated ligamentoplasty. Both groups showed significant clinical and radiological improvement, with no significant difference. Patients operated within less than 1 year had better clinical and radiographic results. There was no correlation between age at surgery and quality of results. The 5 patients who underwent condyloradial pinning showed early recurrence of dislocation and osteoarthritic remodeling. The three cases of Bado type-3 lesion had early recurrence of dislocation.

DISCUSSION

Proximal ulnar osteotomy gives good long-term results in Bado type-1 lesions, regardless of age, if performed before 1 year, in the absence of osteoarthritic remodeling. Associated ligamentoplasty does not seem to be useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective).

Elbow fractures and dislocations

Elbow fractures are common in pediatric patients. Most injuries to the pediatric elbow are stable and require simple immobilization; however, more severe fractures can occur, often requiring operative stabilization and/or close monitoring. This article highlights the common fractures and dislocations about the pediatric elbow and discusses the history, evaluation, and treatment options for specific injuries.

Bilateral combined Monteggia and Galeazzi fractures: a case report

We present an exceedingly rare case of left Monteggia-Galeazzi fracture-dislocation and right Monteggia-distal radius fracture occurring simultaneously in a 20-year old male patient who had fallen 13 meters from a building. The combination of Monteggia and Galeazzi fracture-dislocation in the same forearm is very rare and, to the best of our knowledge, simultaneous bilateral Monteggia and Galeazzi or distal radius fracture in the same patient, have never been reported.