Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro.

METHODS

Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test).

RESULTS

NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings.

Near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging for occlusal caries detection in vitro

The aim of this study was to assess near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging (NIRT-HDRI) for occlusal caries detection in vitro and to compare it with visual inspection using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS) and digital bitewing radiography (BWR). Sixty-one extracted permanent molars with sound or occlusal carious surfaces without severe cavitation were visually assembled. Two examiners assessed twice these surfaces independently using ICDAS, BWR and NIRT-HDRI. The latter was performed with a prototype consisting of two laser sources (780 nm), a CCD sensor and subsequent processing with image analysis software. Thresholds for carious surfaces, enamel and dentin lesions were defined for all methods. Micro-computed tomography served as the reference standard. Linear weighted Kappa analysis of the methods versus the reference at the threshold carious surface, enamel and dentin lesion revealed 0.59/0.08/0.12 for ICDAS, 0.37/- 0.06/0.58 for BWR and 0.33/- 0.01/0.51 for NIRT-HDRI. Sensitivity values at the three thresholds were 0.85/0.78/0.13 for ICDAS, 0.59/0.00/0.69 for BWR and 0.98/0.33/0.78 for NIRT. Specificity values at the three thresholds were 0.70/0.40/1.00 for ICDAS, 0.9./0.96/0.90 for BWR and 0.30/0.65/0.72 for NIRT-HDRI. Reliability analysis revealed substantial agreement for BWR and NIRT and almost perfect agreement for ICDAS. NIRT exhibited a strong ability to identify occlusal dental decay in general; however, it revealed a tendency towards overestimation. Its strength was the detection of dentin caries lesions compared with ICDAS and BWR. NIRT-HDRI seems to be a suitable method to detect hidden dentin caries as a supplement to visual examination.

In vivo correlation of near-infrared transillumination and visual inspection with bitewing radiography for the detection of interproximal caries in permanent and primary teeth

PURPOSE

To evaluate near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) for interproximal caries detection in children by comparing the correlation between both NILT and visual inspection (ICDAS) with bitewing (BW) radiography and by investigating possible differences in caries detection with NILT between primary and permanent teeth.

METHODS

From 35 patients, 121 and 63 interproximal surfaces in, respectively, primary and permanent teeth were included. NILT images were obtained using DIAGNOcam™ (KaVo) and scored by two calibrated raters. A consensus diagnosis was reached for BW radiography; whereas, the ICDAS scores were obtained by one calibrated rater. Weighted Kappa (wκ) was used to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of NILT and to evaluate the correlation between NILT, ICDAS and BW radiography.

RESULTS

The correlation between NILT and BW radiography was moderate to substantial for primary teeth [Rater 1: wκ = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.49-0.75), Rater 2: wκ = 0.55 (95% CI = 0.41-0.69)] and fair for permanent teeth [Rater 1: wκ = 0.34 (95% CI = 0.15-0.53), Rater 2: wκ = 0.33 (95% CI = 0.08-0.58)]. The correlation between ICDAS and BW radiography was moderate for primary teeth [wκ = 0.49 (95% CI = 0.35-0.63)] and substantial for permanent teeth [wκ = 0.62 (95% CI = 0.32-0.92)]. No significant differences were found between primary and permanent teeth.

CONCLUSION

NILT cannot be recommended as a single diagnostic tool for interproximal caries detection in primary teeth. The number of false negatives for dentine caries, especially in first primary molars, was too high. For the use in permanent teeth, NILT could be more accurate than BW radiography.

Occlusal Caries Detection and Diagnosis Using Visual ICDAS Criteria, Laser Fluorescence Measurements, and Near-Infrared Light Transillumination Images

OBJECTIVE

Current diagnostic tools for non-cavitated occlusal caries are not very reliable. For this reason, newer systems need to be developed. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of visual inspection (ICDAS-II), laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen), and the near-infrared transillumination technique (DIAGNOcam) in the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions under clinical and laboratory conditions in 90 third molar teeth planned for extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety third molar teeth were firstly examined in clinical conditions, scored according to ICDAS-II criteria, and examined with DIAGNOdent pen and DIAGNOcam devices. After finishing the clinical examination, the teeth were re-evaluated shortly after the extractions with the same methods. Then, the teeth were sectioned for histological validation according to Downer's criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated based on the histological results.

RESULTS

For the D0-D1-4 threshold, the area under the ROC curve values ranged between 0.754 and 0.881 for all systems. Sensitivity values ranged between 80.5 and 96.1%, and specificity values ranged between 61.5 and 84.6% for the three caries detection methods. DIAGNOcam had the best correlation value (0.616) according to histological observations and demonstrated a sensitivity rate of 96.1%, a specificity rate of 61.5%, and an accuracy rate of 91.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

DIAGNOcam was found to be the most effective method for the diagnosis of occlusal caries without cavitation in permanent molar teeth.