Longitudinal associations of daily affective dynamics with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms

BACKGROUND

Low average affect, measured using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), has been consistently linked with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety, supporting trait-like negative affect as a shared underlying feature. However, while theoretical models of emotion regulation would also implicate greater variability in daily affect in these conditions, empirical evidence linking EMA of mood variability with affective disorders is mixed. We used multilevel modeling to test relationships of daily mood and mood variability with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms.

METHODS

Participants (N = 1004; 72.31 % female; Mage = 40.85) responded to EMA of mood 2-3×/day and completed measures of depression (PHQ-8), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), and social anxiety (SPIN) every three weeks.

RESULTS

Lower mean affect predicted all symptoms at both the between-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.486, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.429, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.284, p < 0.001) and within-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.219, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.196, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.049, p < 0.001) levels. Similarly, at the between-person level, greater affective variability was linked with all three clinical symptoms (PHQ-8: β = 0.617, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = 0.703, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = 0.449, p < 0.001). However, within-person, affective variability related to depression (β = 0.144, p < 0.001) and generalized anxiety (β = 0.150, p < 0.001), but not social anxiety (β = 0.006, p = 0.712).

LIMITATIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period occurred midway through the study.

CONCLUSION

Findings point to common and specific emotion dynamics that characterize affective symptoms severity, with implications for affective monitoring in a clinical context.

Specific associations of passively sensed smartphone data with future symptoms of avoidance, fear, and physiological distress in social anxiety

Background

Prior literature links passively sensed information about a person's location, movement, and communication with social anxiety. These findings hold promise for identifying novel treatment targets, informing clinical care, and personalizing digital mental health interventions. However, social anxiety symptoms are heterogeneous; to identify more precise targets and tailor treatments, there is a need for personal sensing studies aimed at understanding differential predictors of the distinct subdomains of social anxiety. Our objective was to conduct a large-scale smartphone-based sensing study of fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms in the context of trait social anxiety over time.

Methods

Participants (n = 1013; 74.6 % female; M age = 40.9) downloaded the LifeSense app, which collected continuous passive data (e.g., GPS, communication, app and device use) over 16 weeks. We tested a series of multilevel linear regression models to understand within- and between-person associations of 2-week windows of passively sensed smartphone data with fear, avoidance, and physiological distress on the self-reported Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). A shifting sensor lag was applied to examine how smartphone features related to SPIN subdomains 2 weeks in the future (distal prediction), 1 week in the future (medial prediction), and 0 weeks in the future (proximal prediction).

Results

A decrease in time visiting novel places was a strong between-person predictor of social avoidance over time (distal β = -0.886, p = .002; medial β = -0.647, p = .029; proximal β = -0.818, p = .007). Reductions in call- and text-based communications were associated with social avoidance at both the between- (distal β = -0.882, p = .002; medial β = -0.932, p = .001; proximal β = -0.918, p = .001) and within- (distal β = -0.191, p = .046; medial β = -0.213, p = .028) person levels, as well as between-person fear of social situations (distal β = -0.860, p < .001; medial β = -0.892, p < .001; proximal β = -0.886, p < .001) over time. There were fewer significant associations of sensed data with physiological distress. Across the three subscales, smartphone data explained 9-12 % of the variance in social anxiety.

Conclusion

Findings have implications for understanding how social anxiety manifests in daily life, and for personalizing treatments. For example, a signal that someone is likely to begin avoiding social situations may suggest a need for alternative types of exposure-based interventions compared to a signal that someone is likely to begin experiencing increased physiological distress. Our results suggest that as a prophylactic means of targeting social avoidance, it may be helpful to deploy interventions involving social exposures in response to decreases in time spent visiting novel places.

Analyzing text message linguistic features: Do people with depression communicate differently with their close and non-close contacts?

BACKGROUND

Relatively little is known about how communication changes as a function of depression severity and interpersonal closeness. We examined the linguistic features of outgoing text messages among individuals with depression and their close- and non-close contacts.

METHODS

419 participants were included in this 16-week-long observational study. Participants regularly completed the PHQ-8 and rated subjective closeness to their contacts. Text messages were processed to count frequencies of word usage in the LIWC 2015 libraries. A linear mixed modeling approach was used to estimate linguistic feature scores of outgoing text messages.

RESULTS

Regardless of closeness, people with higher PHQ-8 scores tended to use more differentiation words. When texting with close contacts, individuals with higher PHQ-8 scores used more first-person singular, filler, sexual, anger, and negative emotion words. When texting with non-close contacts these participants used more conjunctions, tentative, and sadness-related words and fewer first-person plural words.

CONCLUSION

Word classes used in text messages, when combined with symptom severity and subjective social closeness data, may be indicative of underlying interpersonal processes. These data may hold promise as potential treatment targets to address interpersonal drivers of depression.

The relationship between text message sentiment and self-reported depression

BACKGROUND

Personal sensing has shown promise for detecting behavioral correlates of depression, but there is little work examining personal sensing of cognitive and affective states. Digital language, particularly through personal text messages, is one source that can measure these markers.

METHODS

We correlated privacy-preserving sentiment analysis of text messages with self-reported depression symptom severity. We enrolled 219 U.S. adults in a 16 week longitudinal observational study. Participants installed a personal sensing app on their phones, which administered self-report PHQ-8 assessments of their depression severity, collected phone sensor data, and computed anonymized language sentiment scores from their text messages. We also trained machine learning models for predicting end-of-study self-reported depression status using on blocks of phone sensor and text features.

RESULTS

In correlation analyses, we find that degrees of depression, emotional, and personal pronoun language categories correlate most strongly with self-reported depression, validating prior literature. Our classification models which predict binary depression status achieve a leave-one-out AUC of 0.72 when only considering text features and 0.76 when combining text with other networked smartphone sensors.

LIMITATIONS

Participants were recruited from a panel that over-represented women, caucasians, and individuals with self-reported depression at baseline. As language use differs across demographic factors, generalizability beyond this population may be limited. The study period also coincided with the initial COVID-19 outbreak in the United States, which may have affected smartphone sensor data quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective depression prediction through text message sentiment, especially when combined with other personal sensors, could enable comprehensive mental health monitoring and intervention.

Systematic review of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing

OBJECTIVE

To review published empirical literature on the use of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of the English language literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Papers indexed in computing, technology, and medical databases were included if they were empirical, focused on health and/or wellbeing, involved the collection of data via smartphones, and described the utilized technology as passive or requiring minimal user interaction.

RESULTS

Thirty-five papers were included in the review. Studies were performed around the world, with samples of up to 171 (median n = 15) representing individuals with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression, older adults, and the general population. The majority of studies used the Android operating system and an array of smartphone sensors, most frequently capturing accelerometry, location, audio, and usage data. Captured data were usually sent to a remote server for processing but were shared with participants in only 40% of studies. Reported benefits of passive sensing included accurately detecting changes in status, behavior change through feedback, and increased accountability in participants. Studies reported facing technical, methodological, and privacy challenges.

DISCUSSION

Studies in the nascent area of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing demonstrate promise and invite continued research and investment. Existing studies suffer from weaknesses in research design, lack of feedback and clinical integration, and inadequate attention to privacy issues. Key recommendations relate to developing passive sensing strategies matching the problem at hand, using personalized interventions, and addressing methodological and privacy challenges.

CONCLUSION

As evolving passive sensing technology presents new possibilities for health and wellbeing, additional research must address methodological, clinical integration, and privacy issues. Doing so depends on interdisciplinary collaboration between informatics and clinical experts.