Role of Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist Pitolisant in Early Neural Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

The histamine H3 receptor, prominently expressed in neurons with a minor presence in glial cells, acts as both an autoreceptor and an alloreceptor, controlling the release of histamine and other neurotransmitters. The receptor impacts various essential physiological processes. Our team's initial investigations had demonstrated that the histamine H3 receptor antagonists could facilitate nerve regeneration by promoting the histamine H1 receptors on primary neural stem cells (NSCs) in the traumatic brain injury mouse, which suggested the potential of histamine H3 receptor as a promising target for treating neurological disorders and promoting nerve regeneration. Pitolisant (PITO) is the only histamine H3 receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating narcolepsy. However, there is no report on Pitolisant in neural development or regeneration, and it is urgent to be further studied in strong biological activity models in vitro. The embryonic stem (ES) cells were differentiated into neural cells in vitro, which replicated the neurodevelopmental processes that occur in vivo. It also provided an alternative model for studying neurodevelopmental processes and testing drugs for neurological conditions. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the regulatory role of Pitolisant in the early differentiation of ES cells into neural cells. Our results demonstrated that Pitolisant could promote the differentiation of ES cells toward NSCs and stimulated the formation of growth cones. Furthermore, Pitolisant was capable of inducing the polarization of NSCs through the cAMP-LKB1-SAD/MARK2 pathway, but had no significant effect on later neuronal maturation. Pitolisant altered mitochondrial morphology and upregulated the levels of mitochondrion-related proteins TOM20, Drp1, and p-Drp1, and reversed the inhibitory effect of Mdivi-1 on mitochondrial fission during the early neural differentiation of ES cells. In addition, Pitolisant induced the increase in cytosolic Ca2+. Our study provided an experimental foundation for the potential application of histamine H3 receptor-targeted modulators in the field of neuroregeneration.

Pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays to deal with tolerance to modafinil in patients with narcolepsy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Modafinil is a common treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy. The long-term use of modafinil can lead to tolerance with the loss of efficacy and the continuous increase of its dose. Pharmacological strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays in patients with tolerance to modafinil.

METHODS

Narcolepsy patients on monotherapy with modafinil who developed symptoms of tolerance were eligible. The following alternating therapy regimen was established: Monday to Friday patients continued on modafinil whereas Saturday and Sunday they switched to pitolisant to "bridge" the EDS symptoms. Patients were assessed at baseline and after three months with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS). Health-related quality of life (HrQol) was evaluated by EuroQol5D. Adverse events were documented in the patients' diaries.

RESULTS

41 patients aged 30.9 ± 5.6 years were included. After three months of the alternating therapy regimen, the symptoms of tolerance decreased and the modafinil dose could be reduced by 41% (p < 0.01) resulting in better safety. The EDS improved on ESS (baseline: 18.2 ± 4.2, follow-up: 12.6 ± 4.0, p < 0.0001) and UNS (baseline: 25.8 ± 7.9, follow-up: 18.9 ± 5.9, p < 0.0001). The HrQol increased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tolerance to modafinil could benefit from pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays. This alternating pharmacological strategy proved to be safe and helped to reduce EDS and to decrease the modafinil dose. Further randomized controlled studies are required to evaluate the different strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT05321355.

Real-world treatment of pediatric narcolepsy with pitolisant: A retrospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

First symptoms of narcolepsy mostly present during childhood. Pharmacological management options in children are limited, also due to approval status. Pitolisant is an inverse histamine 3 receptor agonist and has been approved for the treatment of adult narcolepsy with or without cataplexy by EMA and FDA. Clinical experience indicates for a beneficial use also in children and adolescents. Our goal was to evaluate the effects and tolerability of pitolisant in narcolepsy children/adolescents in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective observational study included 55 patients with narcolepsy from three international narcolepsy centers (Germany, France and Italy) who were treated with pitolisant. Patients were eligible if they were at least 6 years old and diagnosed with narcolepsy type 1 or 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics, questionnaires, sleep medicine and laboratory data were collected.

RESULTS

55 children/adolescents (25 girls, 45.45%, 30 boys, 54.55%) aged 6-18 years, with narcolepsy (type 1 = 92.7%, type 2 = 7.3%), were treated with pitolisant. The mean pitolisant dose was 34.1 mg/d. Treatment was effective for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy: the pediatric Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score decreased from 19 to 13.5 (p < 0.001) and the weekly cataplexy frequency improved from 7.9 at baseline to 5.2 (p < 0.001). Treatment with pitolisant was well tolerated. Side effects were mild and mostly short-term. Insomnia was reported most frequently (5.5%).

CONCLUSION

First real-world results suggest that pitolisant treatment is effective in improving EDS and cataplexy in children with narcolepsy, and also is well tolerated.

Pharmacologic Management of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is defined as "irresistible sleepiness in a situation when an individual would be expected to be awake, and alert." EDS has been a big concern not only from a medical but also from a public health point of view. Patients with EDS have the possibility of falling asleep even when they should wake up and concentrate, for example, when they drive, play sports, or walk outside. In this article, clinical characteristics of common hypersomnia and pharmacologic treatments of each hypersomnia are described.

Clinical characteristics of a large cohort of patients with narcolepsy candidate for pitolisant: a cross-sectional study from the Italian PASS Wakix® Cohort

Introduction

Narcolepsy is a chronic and rare hypersomnia of central origin characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and a complex array of symptoms as well as by several medical comorbidities. With growing pharmacological options, polytherapy may increase the possibility of a patient-centered management of narcolepsy symptoms. The aims of our study are to describe a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were candidates for pitolisant treatment and to compare patients’ subgroups based on current drug prescription (drug-naïve patients in whom pitolisant was the first-choice treatment, switching to pitolisant from other monotherapy treatments, and adding on in polytherapy).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey based on Italian data from the inclusion visits of the Post Authorization Safety Study of pitolisant, a 5-year observational, multicenter, international study.

Results

One hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (76.4% with narcolepsy type 1 and 23.6% with narcolepsy type 2). Most patients (63.4%) presented at least one comorbidity, mainly cardiovascular and psychiatric. Pitolisant was prescribed as an add-on treatment in 120/191 patients (62.8%), as switch from other therapies in 42/191 (22.0%), and as a first-line treatment in 29/191 (15.2%). Drug-naive patients presented more severe sleepiness, lower functional status, and a higher incidence of depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Our study presents the picture of a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were prescribed with pitolisant, suggesting that polytherapy is highly frequent to tailor a patient-centered approach.

pitolisant, a novel histamine-3 receptor competitive antagonist, and inverse agonist, in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a debilitating sleep disorder that presents with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy, which is a sudden paralysis of muscle tone triggered by strong emotions such as laughing. It is also associated with many other disorders, including psychiatric disorders, neurologic illnesses, and medication side effects. Common causes of delayed and incorrect diagnoses of these conditions include lack of physician familiarity with narcolepsy symptoms and comorbidities which mask narcolepsy signs and symptoms. Current pharmacologic therapies include Modafinil and Armodafinil for EDS and sodium oxybate for cataplexy. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, presentation, treatment of narcolepsy, and the role of a novel drug, Pitolisant, in the treatment of EDS in adults with narcolepsy. Pitolisant is a histamine-3 receptor (H3R), competitive antagonist, and inverse agonist, acting through the histamine system to regulate wakefulness. It is a novel drug approved in August 2019 by the FDA, is not classified as a controlled substance, and is approved for use in Europe and the United States to treat EDS and cataplexy in narcolepsy. Recent phase II and III trials have shown that Pitolisant helps reduce the ESS score and cataplexy. In summary, based on comparative studies, recent evidence has shown that Pitolisant is non-inferior to Modafinil in the treatment of EDS but superior to Modafinil in reducing cataplexy.

Translational Approaches to Influence Sleep and Arousal

Sleep disorders are widespread in society and are prevalent in military personnel and in Veterans. Disturbances of sleep and arousal mechanisms are common in neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and affective disorders, traumatic brain injury, dementia, and substance use disorders. Sleep disturbances exacerbate suicidal ideation, a major concern for Veterans and in the general population. These disturbances impair quality of life, affect interpersonal relationships, reduce work productivity, exacerbate clinical features of other disorders, and impair recovery. Thus, approaches to improve sleep and modulate arousal are needed. Basic science research on the brain circuitry controlling sleep and arousal led to the recent approval of new drugs targeting the orexin/hypocretin and histamine systems, complementing existing drugs which affect GABA_A receptors and monoaminergic systems. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to modulate sleep and arousal are safe and show potential but require further development to be widely applicable. Invasive viral vector and deep brain stimulation approaches are also in their infancy but may be used to modulate sleep and arousal in severe neurological and psychiatric conditions. Behavioral, pharmacological, non-invasive brain stimulation and cell-specific invasive approaches covered here suggest the potential to selectively influence arousal, sleep initiation, sleep maintenance or sleep-stage specific phenomena such as sleep spindles or slow wave activity. These manipulations can positively impact the treatment of a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders by promoting the restorative effects of sleep on memory consolidation, clearance of toxic metabolites, metabolism, and immune function and by decreasing hyperarousal.

Imaging Histamine H3 Receptors with Positron Emission Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) provides a unique tool to study the biochemistry of the human brain in vivo. By using PET probes that are binding selectively to certain receptor subtypes, brain PET allows the quantification of receptor levels in various brain areas of human subjects. This approach has the potential to reveal abnormal receptor expressions that may contribute to the physiopathology of some psychiatric and neurological disorders. This approach also has the potential to assist in the drug development process by determining receptor occupancy in vivo allowing selection of proper drug dosage to produce therapeutic effects. Several PET tracers have been developed for histamine H3 receptors (H3R). However, despite the potential of PET to elucidate the role of H3R in vivo, only limited work has been conducted so far. This article reviews the work that has been done in this area. Notably, we will cover the limitations of the first-generation PET radioligand for H3R and present the advantages of novel radioligands that promise an explosion of clinical PET research on the role of H3R in vivo.

Sleep disturbances in craniopharyngioma: a challenging diagnosis

Craniopharyngiomas are rare solid or mixed solid and cystic tumors that arise from Rathke's pouch remnants along the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, from the sella turcica to the brain third ventricle. Both the tumor and its treatment can lead to significant neurological and endocrinological complications. Due to the essential role of the hypothalamus in the complex neurophysiologic process of sleep, tumors involving the hypothalamic area may be responsible for disturbances in sleep-wake regulation with alterations in the circadian rhythm, sleep fragmentation, and increased daytime sleepiness. We report two cases of patients with craniopharyngioma, who came to our attention due to the occurrence of episodes characterized by psychomotor slowing and afinalistic limb movements, temporal and spatial disorientation, psychomotor agitation, and oneiric stupor like episodes. A comprehensive clinical data collection and a targeted diagnostic work-up led to a diagnosis of severe sleep disorder characterized by hypersomnia, altered sleep-wake rhythm, and sleep-related breathing disorder. In addition, the polysomnography revealed peculiar alterations in the sleep structure. The diagnostic work-up lead to an accurate differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and episodes expressions of sleep disturbances. These clinical features can be challenging to diagnose and can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Diagnosis of sleep disorders is crucial, considering the impact of sleep on general health, cognition, and neuropsychological functioning. These findings support the need to incorporate a comprehensive sleep evaluation in childhood brain tumor involving the suprasellar/hypothalamic region.

Drugs for patients with epilepsy and excessive daytime sleepiness

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and attentional deficits are often observed in people with epilepsy. They may be the consequence of seizures and subclinical discharges as well as of comorbid conditions as obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAS), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or other less frequent disorders. Excessive daytime sleepiness may also be caused or worsened by antiseizure medications (ASMs). Several meta-analyses suggested that lamotrigine, lacosamide, and perhaps eslicarbazepine are less sedative than other traditional and new ASMs and, in patients prone to somnolence, might be preferred over ASMs with more sedative properties. In patients with severe EDS and/or ADHD, advantages and risks of a treatment with a psychostimulant need to be considered. Methylphenidate, modafinil, armodafinil, pitolisant, and solriamfetol are authorized for use in ADHD and EDS in patients with narcolepsy and some of them also in OSAS. These agents are off-label for the treatment of EDS associated with epilepsy. They do not have proconvulsant effects, although there are several possible risks for patients with epilepsy. The risks of cardiovascular events and psychiatric symptoms should be carefully evaluated as such disorders can coexist with epilepsy and be triggered by these agents. Finally, combination of psychostimulants with ASMs may be associated with several pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.

Pitolisant versus placebo for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Excessive daytime sleepiness is considered as the prominent symptom in narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Pitolisant is a novel selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist approved for improving excessive daytime sleepiness. The meta-analysis is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of pitolisant versus placebo for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from earliest date to November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were mean changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), mean sleep latency, European quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D), and risk ratio of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). We pooled 678 patients from four RCTs and found pitolisant significantly decreased ESS by mean difference (MD) of - 2.86 points (95% CI: -3.75 to -1.96), increased mean sleep latency by MD of 3.14 min (95% CI: 2.18-4.11), and increased EQ-5D by MD of 3.32 points (95% CI: 0.26-6.39) compared with placebo. The risk ratio of TEAE was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08-1.74). Insomnia was the only TEAE significantly associated with pitolisant treatment. In conclusion, pitolisant showed great efficacy and controllable security versus placebo for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA. Compared with narcolepsy, patients with OSA were deemed to benefit more from pitolisant especially in terms of improving mobility and quality of life of patients without continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Efficacy of pitolisant in patients with high burden of narcolepsy symptoms: pooled analysis of short-term, placebo-controlled studies

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H₃)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, in adult patients with high burden of narcolepsy symptoms.

METHODS

Data were pooled from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 7- or 8-week studies of pitolisant (titrated to a potential maximum dose of 35.6 mg/day) in adults with narcolepsy. Analyses included three independent patient subgroups: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) baseline score ≥16, Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) sleep latency ≤8 min, and ≥15 cataplexy attacks per week.

RESULTS

The analysis populations included 118 patients for ESS (pitolisant, n = 60; placebo, n = 58), 105 for MWT (pitolisant, n = 59; placebo, n = 46), and 31 for cataplexy (pitolisant, n = 20; placebo, n = 11). On the ESS, least-squares mean change from baseline was significantly greater for pitolisant (-6.1) compared with placebo (-2.3; P < 0.001). Significantly more pitolisant-treated patients were classified as treatment responders: ESS score reduction ≥3, 69.0% in the pitolisant group versus 35.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.001); final ESS score ≤10, 36.2% versus 10.5%, respectively (P = 0.005). On the MWT, mean sleep latency increased from 3.5 min to 10.4 min with pitolisant and from 3.4 min to 6.8 min with placebo (P = 0.017). Least-squares mean change in the weekly rate of cataplexy was significantly greater for pitolisant (-14.5; baseline, 23.9; final, 9.4) compared with placebo (-0.1; baseline, 23.1; final, 23.0; P = 0.004). Headache was the most common adverse event with pitolisant.

CONCLUSIONS

Pitolisant, at once-daily doses up to 35.6 mg, was efficacious for reducing excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in patients with severe narcolepsy symptom burden.

Novel compounds with dual S1P receptor agonist and histamine H3 receptor antagonist activities act protective in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1 (S1P₁) has emerged as a therapeutic target for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Fingolimod (FTY720) is the first functional antagonist of S1P₁ that has been approved for oral treatment of MS. Previously, we have developed novel butterfly derivatives of FTY720 that acted similar to FTY720 in reducing disease symptoms in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In this study, we have synthesized a piperidine derivative of the oxazolo-oxazole compounds, denoted ST-1505, and its ring-opened analogue ST-1478, and characterised their in-vitro and in-vivo functions. Notably, the 3-piperidinopropyloxy moiety resembles a structural motif of pitolisant, a drug with histamine H₃R antagonistic/inverse agonist activity approved for the treatment of narcolepsy. Both novel compounds exerted H₃R affinities, and in addition, ST-1505 was characterised as a dual S1P₁₊₃ agonist, whereas ST-1478 was a dual S1P₁₊₅ agonist. Both multitargeting compounds were also active in mice and reduced the lymphocyte numbers as well as diminished disease symptoms in the mouse model of MS. The effect of ST-1478 was dependent on SK-2 activity suggesting that it is a prodrug like FTY720, but with a more selective S1P receptor activation profile, whereas ST-1505 is a fully active drug even in the absence of SK-2. In summary, these data suggest that the well soluble piperidine derivatives ST-1505 and ST-1478 hold promise as novel drugs for the treatment of MS and other autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, and by their H₃R antagonist potency, they might additionally improve cognitive impairment during disease.

Histamine receptors, agonists, and antagonists in health and disease

Histamine in the brain is produced by a group of tuberomamillary neurons in the posterior hypothalamus and a limited number of mast cells in different parts of the brain. Four G-protein-coupled receptors mediate the effects of histamine. Two of these receptors, H3 and H4 receptors, are high-affinity receptors in the brain and immune system, respectively. The two classic histamine receptors, H1 receptor and H2 receptor, are well known as drug targets for allergy and gastric ulcer, respectively. These receptors have lower affinity for histamine than the more recently discovered H3 and H4 receptors. The H1 and H2 receptors are important postsynaptic receptors in the brain, and they mediate many of the central effects of histamine on, e.g., alertness and wakefulness. H3 receptor is a pre- and postsynaptic receptor, which regulates release of histamine and several other neurotransmitters, including serotonin, GABA, and glutamate. H4 receptor is found in cerebral blood vessels and microglia, but its expression in neurons is not yet well established. Pitolisant, a H3 receptor antagonist, is used to treat narcolepsy and hypersomnia. H1 receptor antagonists have been used to treat insomnia, but its use requires precautions due to potential side effects. H2 receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in treatment of schizophrenia, but they are not in widespread clinical use. H4 receptor ligands may in the future be tested for neuroimmunological disorders and potentially neurodegenerative disorders in which inflammation plays a role, but clinical tests have not yet been initiated.

[Advances in treatment of narcolepsy]

Narcolepsy is the most common cause of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) following obstructive sleep apnea. Its treatment aims to reduce EDS and cataplexy, improve nighttime sleep disturbance, sleep paralysis and sleep-related hallucinations. Pitolisant (a histamine H3 receptor antagonist) and solriamfetol (a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) have recently been approved effective for narcolepsy in the United States and the European Union. Pitolisant has proved to be effective for both EDS and cataplexy. Besides being effective on EDS, solriamfetol seems to have advantages in abuse potential and withdrawal syndrome. As potential treatments for EDS and cataplexy associated with narcolepsy, several new drugs are being developed and tested. These new drugs include new hydroxybutyrate preparations (controlled release sodium hydroxybutyrate FT218, low sodium hydroxybutyrate JZP-258), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (AXS-12), and modafinil combined with astroglial junction protein inhibitor (THN102). This paper reviews the recently approved drugs and potential treatments for narcolepsy.

In vivo evaluation of effects of histamine H3 receptor antagonists on methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in mice

A single administration with METH (3 mg/kg) induced a hyperlocomotion in male ICR mice. Pretreatment of mice with pitolisant, a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist (5 and 10 mg/kg), for 30 min showed a significant reduction of the hyperlocomotion induced by METH, as compared with vehicle (saline)-pretreated subjects. Pretreatment of mice with the histamine H₃ receptor antagonists JNJ-10181457 (5 and 10 mg/kg) or conessine (20 mg/kg), also showed similar inhibitory effects on METH-induced hyperlocomotion, similar to pitolisant. No significant change in locomotion was observed in mice pretreated with pitolisant, JNJ-10181457, or conessine alone. The pitolisant (10 mg/kg) action on METH-induced hyperlocomotion was completely abolished by the histamine H₁ receptor antagonist pyrilamine (10 mg/kg), but not by the peripherally acting histamine H₁ receptor antagonist fexofenadine (20 mg/kg), the brain-penetrating histamine H₂ receptor antagonist zolantidine (10 mg/kg), or the brain-penetrating histamine H₄ receptor antagonist JNJ-7777120 (40 mg/kg). Pretreatment with a histamine H₃ receptor agonist immepip (10 mg/kg) augmented METH--induced behavior, including hyperlocomotion and stereotyped biting, and combined pretreatment with pitolisant (10 mg/kg) significantly attenuated stereotyped biting. These observations suggest that pretreatment with histamine H₃ receptor antagonists attenuate METH-induced hyperlocomotion via releasing histamine after blocking H₃ receptors, which then bind to the post-synaptic histamine receptor H₁ (but not H₂ or H₄). It is likely that activation of brain histamine systems may be a good strategy for the development of agents, which treat METH abuse and dependence.

Pitolisant protects mice chronically treated with corticosterone from some behavioral but not metabolic changes in corticosterone-induced depression model

PURPOSE

Histamine H₃ receptor ligands may have antidepressant and anxiolytic effects. They can also compensate for metabolic disorders, which affect glucose or triglyceride levels. In previous studies, we have shown that pitolisant, a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist and σ1 receptor agonist, prevented the development of certain metabolic and depressive-like disorders in mice that have been treated chronically with olanzapine.

METHODS

As a continuation of our previous experiments, this study aimed to investigate the antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like activity of pitolisant in mice using the corticosterone-induced depression model. The forced swim and the elevated plus maze tests were used as behavioral endpoints. We also studied the effect pitolisant had on the level of acetoacetic acid in the urine as well as the glucose tolerance and body weight of the mice that had been administered corticosterone.

RESULTS

Pitolisant (10 mg/kg b.w.) did not prevent depressive-like behavior in mice during the chronic corticosterone administration but did counteract anxiety-like behavior, whilst fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) was shown to protect the mice from both of these behaviors. None of the treatments that were used in the study showed an effect on the locomotor activity of the mice. Pitolisant did not prevent an increase in acetoacetic acid levels in the urine, nor did it improve glucose tolerance in the tested mice.

CONCLUSION

Although literature data indicates that there is significant potential for finding an antidepressant and anti-diabetic drug among the histamine H₃ and σ1 receptor ligands, in our study, pitolisant was shown to only slightly compensate for corticosterone-induced abnormalities. However, further research will be required to study pitolisant's anxiolytic-like activity.

Update on the pharmacologic management of narcolepsy: mechanisms of action and clinical implications

Narcolepsy is a chronic, debilitating neurological disorder of sleep-wake state instability. This instability underlies all narcolepsy symptoms, including excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), symptoms of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep dysregulation (ie, cataplexy, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, sleep paralysis), and disrupted nighttime sleep. Several neurotransmitter systems promote wakefulness, and various neural pathways are involved in regulating REM sleep-related muscle atonia, providing multiple targets for pharmacologic intervention to reduce EDS and cataplexy. Medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of EDS in narcolepsy include traditional stimulants (eg, amphetamines, methylphenidate), wake-promoting agents (eg, modafinil, armodafinil), and solriamfetol, which mainly act on dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways. Sodium oxybate (thought to act via GABA_B receptors) is FDA-approved for the treatment of EDS and cataplexy. Pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H₃)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, is approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults and by the FDA for the treatment of EDS in adults with narcolepsy. Pitolisant increases the synthesis and release of histamine in the brain and modulates the release of other neurotransmitters (eg, norepinephrine, dopamine). Antidepressants that inhibit reuptake of serotonin and/or norepinephrine are widely used off label to manage cataplexy. In many patients with narcolepsy, combination treatment with medications that act via different neural pathways is necessary for optimal symptom management. Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and abuse potential are important considerations in treatment selection and subsequent medication adjustments to maximize efficacy and mitigate adverse effects in the treatment of patients with narcolepsy.

Histamine H3 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists: Where do they go?

Since the discovery of the histamine H₃ receptor in 1983, tremendous advances in the pharmacological aspects of H₃ receptor antagonists/inverse agonists have been accomplished in preclinical studies. At present, there are several drug candidates that reached clinical trial studies for various indications. However, entrance of these candidates to the pharmaceutical market is not free from challenges, and a variety of difficulties is engaged with their developmental process. In this review, the potential role of H₃ receptors in the pathophysiology of various central nervous system, metabolic and allergic diseases is discussed. Thereafter, the current status for H₃ receptor antagonists/inverse agonists in ongoing clinical trial studies is reviewed and obstacles in developing these agents are emphasized.

Pitolisant and intravenous cocaine self-administration in mice

Pitolisant, a selective inverse agonist for the histamine H3 receptor, is a new treatment for adults suffering from narcolepsy. Numerous studies have shown that striatal H3 receptors can modulate the activity of the dopamine mesolimbic system, a neuronal pathway that plays a crucial role in drug addiction. Therefore, it is important to guarantee that pitolisant has no abuse potential and does not potentiate the behavioral effects of psychostimulants. The present study tested the effects of pitolisant on cocaine reinforcement in C57BL/6J mice using the intravenous self-administration technique. Mice were trained to self-administer cocaine intravenously. After the acquisition of cocaine self-administration, pitolisant was tested on cocaine self-administration under different schedules of reinforcement (fixed ratio and progressive ratio). In another group of mice, cocaine was replaced with pitolisant after the acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Finally, a group of mice was trained to self-administer pitolisant intravenously and directly compared to mice trained to self-administer cocaine under the same conditions. Our results indicate that pitolisant does not influence the reinforcing effects of cocaine under any of the experimental conditions used in this study. Moreover, pitolisant has no reinforcing properties alone when tested in the self-administration paradigm. Our results offer more evidence to support the hypothesis that pitolisant is not addictive. In addition, pitolisant does not alter the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Finally, the present study provides no evidence for a significant involvement of histamine H3 receptors in cocaine dependence.

Drugs Used in Narcolepsy and Other Hypersomnias

Narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia cannot be cured; all available treatments are symptomatic. It is of paramount importance for patients, and their relatives, to be informed about the consequences of these chronic diseases and to become ready to accept the consequences of the diagnosis before starting any treatment. This facilitates the implementation of behavioral modifications and the proper use of medication to decrease the disease burden. A supportive social environment (eg, family members, friends, employer, colleagues, and patient support groups) is instrumental. Current treatment options are discussed with a focus on pharmacologic treatment, including future directions.

The histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist pitolisant reduces body weight in obese mice

The pharmacological profile of pitolisant, a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, indicates that this compound might reduce body weight and metabolic disturbances. Therefore, we studied the influence of pitolisant on body weight, water and sucrose intake as well as metabolic disturbances in the high-fat and high-sugar diet-induced obesity model in mice. To induce obesity, male CD-1 mice were fed a high-fat diet consisting of 40% fat blend for 14 weeks, water and 30% sucrose solution available ad libitum. Glucose tolerance test was performed at the beginning of week 15. Insulin tolerance was tested the day after. At the end of study, plasma levels of triglycerides and cholesterol were determined. Pitolisant at dose of 10 mg/kg bw (ip) was administrated during 14 days, starting from the beginning of week 13. Metformin at dose of 100 mg/kg bw (ip) was used as reference drug. Mice fed with high-fat diet and sucrose solution showed more weight gain throughout the 12-week period of inducing obesity. Animals fed with high-fat diet and treated with pitolisant (for the next 14 days) showed significantly less weight gain than mice from the control group consuming a high-fat feed. In the group treated with pitolisant, glucose levels were significantly lower than glucose levels of control obese mice after glucose load. The plasma triglyceride levels in pitolisant-treated mice were significantly lower compared with those in control obese group. In conclusion, pitolisant has a favorable influence of body weight and improves glucose tolerance and the lipid profile in obese mice.

The European Medicines Agency review of pitolisant for treatment of narcolepsy: summary of the scientific assessment by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use

On 31 March 2016, the European Commission issued a decision for a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union (EU) for pitolisant (Wakix) for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults. Pitolisant is an antagonist/inverse agonist of the human histamine H3 receptor. The dose should be selected using an up-titration scheme depending on individual patient response and tolerance and should not exceed 36 mg/day. The main evidence of efficacy of pitolisant was based on two Phase III clinical trials. The improvement on excessive daytime sleepiness was shown against placebo in the Harmony I study (-3.33 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) [-5.83; -0.83]; p = 0.024) and in Harmony CTP (-3.41 points; 95% CI [-4.95; -1.87]; p < 0.0001). The daily cataplexy rate in Harmony I improved against placebo with a rate ratio (rR) of 0.38 whilst in the Harmony CTP the ratio of improvement on weekly cataplexy rate against placebo was 0.512. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were headache, insomnia and nausea. This article summarizes the scientific review leading to approval of pitolisant in the EU. The assessment report and product information are available on the European Medicines Agency website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).

H3 histamine receptor antagonist pitolisant reverses some subchronic disturbances induced by olanzapine in mice

The use of atypical antipsychotic drugs like olanzapine is associated with side effects such as sedation and depression-like symptoms, especially during the initial period of the use. It is believed that the occurrence of these undesirable effectsis mainly the result of the histamine H1receptors blockade by olanzapine. In addition, use of olanzapine increases the level of triglycerides in the blood, which correlates with growing obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pitolisant - H3 histamine antagonist - on subchronic olanzapine-induced depresion-like symptoms, sedation and hypertriglicerydemia. Forced swim test was conducted to determinate depressive-like effect of olanzapine and antidepressive-like activity during the co-administered pitolisant. The test was performed after the first and fifteenth day of the treatment of the mice. The spontaneous activity of the mice was measured on the fourteenth day of the treatment with a special, innovative RFID-system (Radio-frequency identification system) - TraffiCage (TSE-Systems, Germany). Triglyceride levels were determined on the sixteenth day of the experiment after 15 cycles of drug administration. Daily olanzapine treatment (4 mg/kg b.w., i.p., d.p.d) for 15 days significantly induces sedation (p < 0.05) and prolongs immobility time in forced swim tests (FST) in mice (p < 0.05); and also elevates the level of triglycerides (p < 0.05). Administration of pitolisant (10 mg/kg b.w., i.p.) subsequentto olanzapine normalizes these adverse effects. This study presents a promising alternative for counteracting some behavioral changes and metabolic disturbances which occur in the early period of treatment with antipsychotic drugs.

Can an early phase clinical pharmacology study replace a thorough QT study? Experience with a novel H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study.

METHODS

The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared.

RESULTS

In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study.

CONCLUSION

Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.

Role of the Histamine H3 Receptor in the Central Nervous System

The G_i/o protein-coupled histamine H₃ receptor is distributed throughout the central nervous system including areas like cerebral cortex, hippocampus and striatum with the density being highest in the posterior hypothalamus, i.e. the area in which the histaminergic cell bodies are located. In contrast to the other histamine receptor subtypes (H₁, H₂ and H₄), the H₃ receptor is located presynaptically and shows a constitutive activity. In detail, H₃ receptors are involved in the inhibition of histamine release (presynaptic autoreceptor), impulse flow along the histaminergic neurones (somadendritic autoreceptor) and histamine synthesis. Moreover, they occur as inhibitory presynaptic heteroreceptors on serotoninergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, glutamatergic, GABAergic and perhaps cholinergic neurones. This review shows for four functions of the brain that the H₃ receptor represents a brake against the wake-promoting, anticonvulsant and anorectic effect of histamine (via postsynaptic H₁ receptors) and its procognitive activity (via postsynaptic H₁ and H₂ receptors). Indeed, H₁ agonists and H₃ inverse agonists elicit essentially the same effects, at least in rodents; these effects are opposite in direction to those elicited by brain-penetrating H₁ receptor antagonists in humans. Although the benefit for H₃ inverse agonists for the symptomatic treatment of dementias is inconclusive, several members of this group have shown a marked potential for the treatment of disorders associated with excessive daytime sleepiness. In March 2016, the European Commission granted a marketing authorisation for pitolisant (Wakix^R) (as the first representative of the H₃ inverse agonists) for the treatment of narcolepsy.