CpG-Adjuvanted Hepatitis B Vaccine (HEPLISAV-B®) Update

Introduction: HEPLISAV-B is a hepatitis B vaccine composed of rHBsAg mixed with a synthetic oligonucleotide containing CpG motifs that stimulate innate immunity through TLR9. This vaccine was recently approved by FDA in view of its superior efficacy.Areas covered: Published literature on HEPLISAV-B was critically reviewed. Four randomized controlled trials among 7,056 subjects receiving 2 doses of HEPLISAV-B and 3,214 subjects receiving 3 doses of Engerix-B showed superior seroprotection rate (SPR) (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) of 90-100%, compared with 71-90% in those receiving Engerix-B. Furthermore, the seroprotection rate was also significantly higher in HEPLISAV-B compared with Engerix-B recipients in persons with traditionally poor vaccine responses such as older adults, diabetics, and those with chronic kidney disease. The safety profiles among 9,871 subjects were similar between HEPLISAV-B and Engerix-B .Expert opinion: HEPLISAV-B, a CpG adjuvant mixed with HBsAg, is more efficacious and produced earlier seroprotection compared to existing vaccines, with a favorable safety profile. The shorter, two-dose regimen, earlier seroprotection, higher adherence, and a higher seroprotection rate, especially in populations with traditionally poor vaccine response, makes this an important therapeutic option in hepatitis B vaccination.

A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of a PreS/S hepatitis B vaccine Sci-B-Vac™, as compared to Engerix B®, among vaccine naïve and vaccine non-responder dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients have a suboptimal response to hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination. This study aimed to compare the immunogenicity of two vaccines: the third-generation Sci-B-Vac™ vs. the second-generation Engerix B^®. The cohort included two groups of dialysis patients: naïve and previously vaccinated non-responders. Primary endpoints were antibody titers ≥10 IU/L at 3 and 7 month post-vaccination. Secondary objectives were seroprotection rates in vaccine-naïve patients and in previously vaccinated non-responders.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were assigned to vaccine (Sci-B-Vac™ or Engerix B^®) using computer-generated randomization, stratified by age, gender, diabetes, and previous HBV vaccination. Sci-B-Vac™ was administered in three doses, 10 μg, at 0, 1, and 6 months in naïve patients; or 20 μg in previously vaccinated non-responders. Engerix B^® included four doses, 40 μg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Each group had 43 patients. Seroconversion was 69.8% with Engerix B^® vs. 73.2% with Sci-B-Vac™. Antibody titers at 7 months were higher with Sci-B-Vac™ (266.4 ± 383.9, median 53.4) than with Engerix^® (193.2 ± 328.9, median 19). However, these differences were not significant, perhaps due to a suboptimal sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests comparable immunogenicity for both vaccines. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in seroconversion by vaccine type. It is noteworthy that naïve patients were vaccinated with a standard dose of Sci-B-Vac™, while Engerix B^® was administered at a double dose. Similarly, although mean antibody titer levels in the Sci-B-Vac™ group were higher than in the Engerix^® group, this difference did not reach significance. Consequently, a future clinical trial should recruit a larger cohort of patients, using a standard double-dose protocol in both groups.

Age-dependent decrease of anti-HBs titers and effect of booster doses using 2 different vaccines in Palestinian children vaccinated in early childhood

Immunization against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has proven to be highly effective and led to significant reduction of new infections worldwide. However, protective immunity measured by anti-HBs titers may decrease to critical levels in the years after basal immunization, particularly in case of exposure to HBV variants different from the vaccine strain. We tested 400 Palestinian children between one and 19 years of age for their anti-HBs titer, challenged the immune memory of those with low or absent anti-HBs with 2 types of hepatitis B vaccines and determined thereafter the anti-HBs titer. At the age of one, 92.2% of the children presented with protective anti-HBs titers (≥ 10 mIU/ml) with the majority having ≥ 100 mIU/ml. Protective immunity was still high at ages 2 (87.5%) and 4 (95%), declining by age 5 and 6 (from 69.2% to 66.7%) and down to an average of 39.8% between the ages of 7 and 19. 160 children with a nonprotective or low immune response challenged with either the yeast-derived Engerix-B or the mammalian cell-derived preS1-containing Sci-B-Vac vaccine showed an anamnestic immune response. 92.4% and 85.9% of the children challenged with one dose Sci-B-Vac and Engerix-B presented with anti-HBs titers >100 mIU/ml respectively. Our results reveal that vaccine-induced protective anti-HBs titers against HBV decrease rapidly beyond the age of 6 in Palestinian children, but can be strongly enhanced with a single booster vaccine dose, independent of brand and antigen composition. Our data suggest that a booster vaccine dose against HBV during school years may be useful.