[Imaging of eosinophilic fasciitis in ultrasound and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging): a case report]

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF, also known as Shulman syndrome) is an uncommon connective tissue disease characterized by inflammatory thickening of the fasciae as well as swelling and hardening of the skin. It mostly affects the lower extremities. Swollen and indurated skin, together with the groove sign, are typical clinical signs. So far, biopsy evidence of inflammation and thickening of the fascia has been the gold standard for diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is mentioned in the literature as an alternative method for confirming the diagnosis. We present a case of asymmetric EF in a 54-year-old German male. He came with painful induration of the right forearm, with a characteristic groove sign and limitation of motion of the right hand. The blood count revealed eosinophilia with 0.57 G/l or 9.6% (normal: 0.05-0.5 G/l and 0.5-5.5%), ANA and ENA were negative. The diagnosis was confirmed histologically and we were able to detect a thickened fascia in MRI and ultrasound imaging. The EF also appeared in the left lateral malleolus during the course of the illness. Treatment was carried out with prednisolone and methotrexate.

Revisiting idiopathic eosinophilic myositis: towards a clinical-pathological continuum from the muscle to the fascia and skin

OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are mainly defined by inflammatory infiltrates within the muscle (lymphocytes and macrophages). Eosinophil muscle infiltration has been described in idiopathic eosinophilic myositis (IEM) and rarely in EF. This study aimed to further delineate the nosological frame of idiopathic eosinophil muscle infiltration through the exhaustive analysis of IEM and EF patients.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective case series included IEM patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2022. IEM inclusion criteria were eosinophilic muscle infiltration with myositis pathological features, after the exclusion of differential diagnoses. An additional group of EF patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2022 was constituted. Inclusion criteria were an EF diagnosis and fascia thickening with inflammatory infiltrate.

RESULTS

A total of 20 IEM cases and 10 EF cases were included. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis was 65 (49-70) years; there were 18 males. Data analysis delineated four subgroups: focal EM (FEM, n = 3), diffuse EM (DEM, n = 6), eosinophilic myofasciitis (EMF, n = 11) and EF (n = 10). FEM represented a limited and benign form of myositis. DEM cases presented objective muscle impairment with eosinophilic muscle infiltration. EMF patients presented subjective muscle impairment (myalgia, 55%), fasciitis (on histology and/or imaging), eosinophilic muscle infiltration and frequent hypereosinophilia (55%). EF patients presented myalgia (50%), muscle lesions on histology with fascia-restricted inflammatory infiltrates with (60%) or without (40%) eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of IEM and EF patient characteristics delineates four subgroups (FEM, DEM, EMF and EF) in terms of clinical, laboratory, imaging, pathological and outcome specificities, and proposes an adapted diagnostic and care management approach.

The enigmatic fascia: eosinophilic fasciitis

This case report highlights the potentially underrecognized subtype of unilateral eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) in a 28 year old man. With fewer than 300 reported encounters to date, EF is a rare disease that eludes clinicians by presenting as a scleroderma like syndrome. As EF remains a clinical diagnosis, biopsy results may be nonspecific, and the disease can easily be misdiagnosed (or missed entirely) if a full thickness biopsy is not reviewed by a dermatopathologist. The authors also emphasize the importance of internationally accepted diagnostic criteria, of which at least two different sets exist.

Mycophenolate mofetil and mycophenolic acid for the treatment of eosinophilic fasciitis: report of two cases and literature review

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is an uncommon autoimmune connective tissue disorder characterized by edema, erythema, and subsequent induration of the extremities. It is commonly treated with corticosteroids but there is no treatment ladder for immunosuppressants or steroid-sparing agents. We report two EF cases treated effectively with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) and present a literature review. We performed a MEDLINE search using the keywords 'eosinophilic fasciitis', 'Shulman syndrome', 'mycophenolic acid', or 'mofetil mycophenolate', and found 8 articles with 27 cases in which MMF or MPA was used. Twenty-nine cases were reviewed (2 reported herein and 27 from the literature search); all patients received a combination of systemic corticosteroids and MMF. MMF/MPA were given as a steroid-sparing agent in 27 (93.1%), in 1 (3.4%) as adjunctive therapy with other immunosuppressants, and in one, as monotherapy 1 (3.4%). Nineteen had a complete response, 6, a partial response, and 2 were unresponsive to diverse immunomodulators; in 2 cases, the outcome was not reported. MMF and MPA show promising therapeutic results and could be a treatment option to reduce corticosteroid related side effects.

Long-term outcome of eosinophilic fasciitis: A cross-sectional evaluation of 35 patients

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a connective tissue disease with an unknown long-term course.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate presence and determinants of residual disease damage in patients with EF after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven EF were included for this cross-sectional study. Outcome measures included the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Damage (PhysGA-D), skin pliability scores, passive range of motion, and health-related quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires.

RESULTS

In total, 35 patients (24 of whom were female [68.6%]) with a median age of 60 years participated. All patients had detectable residual damage. Impairment of HRQoL, assessed by the Dermatology Quality of Life Index and the 36-Item Short-Form Survey, correlated to the extent of residual damage. The PhysGA-D score at participation correlated to signs of severe disease at presentation, such as increased C-reactive protein level (Spearman's rho [r_s ] = 0.486, P = .006), involvement of the neck (r_s = 0.528, P = .001) and trunk (r_s = 0.483, P = .003), prolonged time to disease remission (r_s = 0.575, P = .003), and presence of concomitant morphea (r_s = 0.349, P = .040). Lastly, maximum methotrexate dose correlated negatively to PhysGA-D score at study participation (r_s = -0.393, P = .022).

LIMITATIONS

Sample size.

CONCLUSION

All patients with EF had detectable residual damage. Impairment of HRQoL correlated to the extent of residual damage. Advanced age and signs of severe disease at presentation were associated with the severity of residual damage.

[Eosinophilic fasciitis, morphea and vitiligo in a single patient]

BACKGROUND

Fasciitis with eosinophilia (FE), or Shulman syndrome, is a rare disease of unknown origin for which the nosological profile has not been clearly defined. It is clinically characterised by oedema and induration of the limbs with hypereosinophilia. It may be associated with morphea, in which case it carries a poor prognosis, or other diseases, particularly autoimmune conditions. Herein, we report a case of fasciitis associated with eosinophilia, morphea and vitiligo.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 45-year-old male patient followed up for vitiligo for 20 years had been presenting swelling and induration of the skin on all 4 limbs for the previous 7 months associated with morphea on the trunk. Treatment consisting of systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate was initiated and displayed a certain degree of efficacy.

DISCUSSION

The association of morphea/fasciitis with eosinophilia is a classical finding; the presence of vitiligo raises the question of possible association between these different disorders.