Prevalence, distribution characteristic and risk factors of lumbar vertebral axial rotation in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on vertebral axial rotation (VAR) in the lumbar spine, focusing on both close and distant neighboring vertebrae. A total of 516 patients with LDH and an equal number of healthy individuals were included in the study, matched for age and gender. The degree of axial rotation for each lumbar spine vertebra was assessed using the Nash-Moe index. The results revealed that the prevalence of VAR in the lumbar spine was significantly higher in the LDH group compared to the Control group (65.7% vs 46.7%, P < 0.001). Among the LDH group, the L2 vertebra had the highest frequency of VAR (49.5%), followed by L1 (45.1%), and then L3 to L5 (33.6%, 8.9%, 3.1%, respectively). A similar pattern was observed in the Control group (L2, 39.8%; L1, 34.6%; L3, 23.2%; L4, 3.1%; L5, 0.8%). Furthermore, the study found that disc herniation was associated with a higher incidence of VAR not only in close neighboring vertebrae but also in distant neighboring vertebrae. This indicates that the biomechanical influence of LDH extends beyond just the immediate adjacent vertebrae. To identify potential risk factors for VAR in LDH patients, multivariate analysis was performed. The results revealed that age was an independent risk factor for VAR (OR 1.022, 95% CI [1.011, 1.034], P < 0.001). However, the duration of symptoms and presence of back pain were not found to be significant risk factors for VAR.

Vertebral arteries do not experience tensile force during manual cervical spine manipulation applied to human cadavers

BACKGROUND

The vertebral artery (VA) may be stretched and subsequently damaged during manual cervical spine manipulation. The objective of this study was to measure VA length changes that occur during cervical spine manipulation and to compare these to the VA failure length.

METHODS

Piezoelectric ultrasound crystals were implanted along the length of the VA (C1 to C7) and were used to measure length changes during cervical spine manipulation of seven un-embalmed, post-rigor human cadavers. Arteries were then excised, and elongation from arbitrary in-situ head/neck positions to first force (0.1 N) was measured. Following this, VA were stretched (8.33 mm/s) to mechanical failure. Failure was defined as the instance when VA elongation resulted in a decrease in force.

RESULTS

From arbitrary in-situ head/neck positions, the greatest average VA length change during spinal manipulation was [mean (range)] 5.1% (1.1 to 15.1%). From arbitrary in-situ head/neck positions, arteries were elongated on average 33.5% (4.6 to 84.6%) prior to first force occurrence and 51.3% (16.3 to 105.1%) to failure. Average failure forces were 3.4 N (1.4 to 9.7 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Measured in arbitrary in-situ head/neck positions, VA were slack. It appears that this slack must be taken up prior to VA experiencing tensile force. During cervical spine manipulations (using cervical spine extension and rotation), arterial length changes remained below that slack length, suggesting that VA elongated but were not stretched during the manipulation. However, in order to answer the question if cervical spine manipulation is safe from a mechanical perspective, the testing performed here needs to be repeated using a defined in-situ head/neck position and take into consideration other structures (e.g. carotid arteries).

Effect of incremental intensities on the spinal morphology and core muscle activation in competitive cyclists

Cycling is a sport where cyclists predominantly adopt a sitting posture, with the trunk tilted forward. This posture requires a high volume of training and duration in several intensities of effort. This study aims to: 1) evaluate the behaviour of the thoracic and lumbar spine flexion and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane, the thoracic and lumbar spine flexion in the frontal plane, and the trunk torsion in the transverse plane; 2) compare the activation of the core muscles as the intensity of effort increases during an incremental test in cycling, and 3) identify which core muscle has a greater activation in each intensity zone. The spinal posture and the activation of the eight core muscles were evaluated in twelve competitive cyclists during incremental cycling intensities. Thoracic and lumbar spine flexion and sacral inclination statistically increased as the intensity of effort increased (Start < VT1 < VT2 < VO2max). A significant increase in muscle activation was observed in all core muscles evaluated as the intensity increased. The rectus abdominis showed statistically significant greater muscle activation than the other core muscles evaluated. In conclusion, as the intensity of effort in cycling increases, cyclists significantly increase the thoracic and lumbar spine flexion, the sacral inclination in the sagittal plane, the thoracic and lumbar spine flexion in the frontal plane, trunk rotation in the transverse plane, as well as the activation of the core muscles.

Effects of cycling on the morphology and spinal posture in professional and recreational cyclists: a systematic review

The aim was to know if cycling affects spinal morphology in postures off the bicycle, such as adapting the spinal curvatures on the bicycle depending on the handlebar type and position on the handlebars. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The studies selected met the following criteria: a) the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal (experimental or cohorts); b) the study evaluated the sagittal morphology of the spine on the bicycle; c) the study included healthy and trained participants without injuries or cyclists reporting low back pain. Fifteen studies reported that a greater pelvic tilt was observed that when the handlebar was in a lower position. Sixteen studies found that lumbar kyphosis was greater when the handlebar grip was lower and farther from the saddle. Twelve studies reported that a tendency towards greater thoracic flexion as the time spent pedalling on the bicycle increased. In conclusion, the practice of cycling produces adaptations in the morphology of the spine of the cyclist compared to non-cyclists, such as an increase in pelvic tilt and a greater capacity for lumbar flexion in trunk flexion positions, and a greater thoracic kyphosis in the standing position.

Lumbar stability following graded unilateral and bilateral facetectomy: A finite element model study

BACKGROUND

Excision of excessive amount of facet joint during lumbar discectomy or decompression can cause segmental instability of the lumbar spine. This study was performed to assess the segmental instability, facet joint loading and intradiscal pressure following graded lumbar facetectomy. This biomechanical study was performed using a verified and validated L3-S1 finite element model.

METHODS

Nine scenarios were analysed. Intact model as control, 30%, 45%, 60% and complete facet joint excision in unilateral and bilateral setting. The effect of progressive graded facetectomy of L4-L5 on the segmental mobility, facet loading and intradiscal pressure was assessed.

FINDINGS

In comparison with control 30% excision of the facet joint mainly caused increase in mediolateral mobility. With 45% excision of the facet joint there was increase in both anteroposterior and mediolateral mobility, this was worse in bilateral and unilateral models respectively. This worsened with larger facet excision scenarios. Facet load increased significantly on extension with excision of 45% & 60% unilaterally and 100% bilaterally. Flexion produced rise in intradiscal pressure in all scenarios.

INTERPRETATION

The increased spinal mobility, facet loading and intradiscal pressure with more than 30% facetectomy highlights the importance of preserving the facets during decompression thereby safeguarding accelerated degeneration of these segments and iatrogenic segmental instability. The findings from this study could also potentially explain the correlation between spinal instability, disc degeneration and facet joint arthrosis as noted in clinical studies.

Development of a novel geometrically-parametric patient-specific finite element model to investigate the effects of the lumbar lordosis angle on fusion surgery

The success of lumbar interbody fusion, the key surgical procedure for treating different pathologies of the lumbar spine, is highly dependent on determining the patient-specific lumbar lordosis (LL) and restoring sagittal balance. This study aimed to (1) develop a personalized finite element (FE) model that automatically updates spinal geometry for different patients; and (2) apply this technique to study the influence of LL on post-fusion spinal biomechanics. Using an X-Ray image-based algorithm, the geometry of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) was updated using independent parameters. Ten subject-specific nonlinear osteoligamentous FE models were developed based on pre-operative images of fusion surgery candidate patients. Post-operative FE models of the same patients were consequently created. Comparison of the obtained results from FE models with pre- and post-operation functional images demonstrated the potential value of this technique in clinical applications. A parametric study of the effect of LL was conducted for cases with zero LL angle, positive LL angles (+6° and +12°) and negative LL angles (-3° and -6°) on fused level (L4-L5), resulting in a total of 50 fusion simulation models. The average range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and fiber strain at adjacent levels were significantly higher with decreased LL during different directions except axial rotation. This study demonstrates that the LL alters both the intersegmental motion and load-sharing in fusion, which may influence the initiation and rate of adjacent level degeneration. This personalized FE platform provides a practical, clinically applicable approach for the analyses of the biomechanical changes associated with lumbar spine fusion.

ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2019: biomechanical changes in dynamic sagittal balance and lower limb compensatory strategies following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity patients

STUDY DESIGN

A longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To define a set of objective biomechanical metrics that are representative of adult spinal deformity (ASD) post-surgical outcomes and that may forecast post-surgical mechanical complications. Current outcomes for ASD surgical planning and post-surgical assessment are limited to static radiographic alignment and patient-reported questionnaires. Little is known about the compensatory biomechanical strategies for stabilizing sagittal balance during functional movements in ASD patients.

METHODS

We collected in-clinic motion data from 15 ASD patients and 10 controls during an unassisted sit-to-stand (STS) functional maneuver. Joint motions were measured using noninvasive 3D depth mapping sensor technology. Mathematical methods were used to attain high-fidelity joint-position tracking for biomechanical modeling. This approach provided reliable measurements for biomechanical behaviors at the spine, hip, and knee. These included peak sagittal vertical axis (SVA) over the course of the STS, as well as forces and muscular moments at various joints. We compared changes in dynamic sagittal balance (DSB) metrics between pre- and post-surgery and then separately compared pre- and post-surgical data to controls.

RESULTS

Standard radiographic and patient-reported outcomes significantly improved following realignment surgery. From the DSB biomechanical metrics, peak SVA and biomechanical loads and muscular forces on the lower lumbar spine significantly reduced following surgery (- 19 to - 30%, all p < 0.05). In addition, as SVA improved, hip moments decreased (- 28 to - 65%, all p < 0.05) and knee moments increased (+ 7 to + 28%, p < 0.05), indicating changes in lower limb compensatory strategies. After surgery, DSB data approached values from the controls, with some post-surgical metrics becoming statistically equivalent to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal changes in DSB following successful multi-level spinal realignment indicate reduced forces on the lower lumbar spine along with altered lower limb dynamics matching that of controls. Inadequate improvement in DSB may indicate increased risk of post-surgical mechanical failure. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Adaptation of a clinical fixation device for biomechanical testing of the lumbar spine

In-vitro biomechanical testing is widely performed for characterizing the load-displacement characteristics of intact, injured, degenerated, and surgically repaired osteoligamentous spine specimens. Traditional specimen fixture devices offer an unspecified rigidity of fixation, while varying in the associated amounts and reversibility of damage to and "coverage" of a specimen - factors that can limit surgical access to structures of interest during testing as well as preclude the possibility of testing certain segments of a specimen. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a specimen fixture system for spine biomechanical testing that uses components of clinically available spinal fixation hardware and determine whether the new system provides sufficient rigidity for spine biomechanical testing. Custom testing blocks were mounted into a robotic testing system and the angular deflection of the upper fixture was measured indirectly using linear variable differential transformers. The fixture system had an overall stiffness 37.0, 16.7 and 13.3 times greater than a typical human functional spine unit for the flexion/extension, axial rotation and lateral bending directions respectively - sufficient rigidity for biomechanical testing. Fixture motion when mounted to a lumbar spine specimen revealed average motion of 0.6, 0.6, and 1.5° in each direction. This specimen fixture method causes only minimal damage to a specimen, permits testing of all levels of a specimen, and provides for surgical access during testing.

Analysis of the s2 alar-iliac screw as compared with the traditional iliac screw: does it increase stability with sacroiliac fixation of the spine?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Arthrodesis of the lumbosacral junction continues to be a challenge in pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical rigidity of two types of lumbosacral fixation. Our hypothesis was that the use of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation will result in statistically similar biomechanical fixation as compared with use of an iliac screw with a 95% confidence interval.

STUDY SETTING

Controlled biomechanical laboratory METHODS: Ten human cadaveric lumbosacral specimens were separated into two test groups: (1) S2AI (n=5) and (2) iliac screw (n=5). S2AI and iliac screws were placed according to current clinical practice techniques. Specimens were mounted in an unconstrained dual leg stance configuration for testing in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. These loads were induced by moving the offset loading arm 10 mm in the respective direction from the point of neutral motion with displacement control up to a 10 N-m moment, except axial rotation which used a 4 N-m moment. Optical tracking was used to monitor motion of the vertebra, pelvis, and fixation instrumentation during testing. Specimens were tested in intact and instrumented states. The stiffness values between S2AI and iliac screw configurations were compared.

DISCLOSURE

The present study received external research support (>$50,000 -<$75,000) from Stryker Spine (Allendale, NJ, USA).

RESULTS

There was a consistent trend of increased construct stiffness for all S2AI samples compared with the iliac screw group. However, none of the groups tested reached statistical significance for a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

S2AI screws are just as stable as iliac screws with biomechanical testing in flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Given the similarities of biomechanical testing to human movements, these findings support S2AI screws as a viable option for lumbosacral fixation.

Traumatic L4-5 bilateral locked facet joints

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic bilateral locked facet joints occur with extreme rarity in the lumbar spine. A careful review of the literature revealed only three case reports.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 36 year-old male who suffered bilateral L4-5 facet fracture dislocations following a motor vehicle collision. The dislocation was associated with disruption of the posterior elements and a Grade II anterolisthesis of L4 on L5 as well as an epidural hematoma resulting in severe canal narrowing, with the patient remaining neurologically intact on presentation. The patient underwent open reduction with L3 to S1 pedicle screw fixation and arthrodesis to treat this highly unstable injury.

CONCLUSION

The existing literature and a biomechanics review of the lumbar spine are described in the context of the presented case in addition to a proposed mechanism for such dislocations.

How Does Spinal Release and Ponte Osteotomy Improve Spinal Flexibility? The Law of Diminishing Returns

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of stepwise resection of posterior spinal ligaments, facet joints, and ribs on thoracic spinal flexibility.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior spinal ligaments, facet joints and ribs are removed to increase spinal flexibility in corrective spinal surgery for deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Reported clinical results vary and biomechanical substantiation is lacking.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic spinal specimens (T6-T11) were studied. A spinal motion simulator applied a pure moment of ±2.5 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR). Range of motion (ROM) was measured for the intact spine and measured again after stepwise resection of the supra/interspinous ligament (SIL), inferior facet, flaval ligament, superior facet, and rib heads.

RESULTS

SIL resection increased ROM in flexion (10.2%) and AR (3.1%). Successive inferior facetectomy increased ROM in flexion (4.1%), LB (3.8%) and AR (7.7%), and flavectomy in flexion (9.1%) and AR (2.5%). Sequential superior facetectomy only increased ROM in flexion (6.3%). Rib removal provided an additional increase in flexion (6.3%), LB (4.5%) and AR (13.0%). Extension ROM increased by 10.5% after the combined removal of the SIL, inferior facet and flaval ligament.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior spinal releases in these non-scoliotic spines led to an incremental increase in spinal flexibility, but each sequential step had less effect. As compared to SIL resection with inferior facetectomy, additional superior facetectomy did not improve flexibility in AR and LB and only 6.3% in flexion. The data presented from this in vitro study should be interpreted with care, as no representative cadaveric spine model for AIS was available, However, the results presented here at least question the benefits of performing routine complete facetectomies (i.e. Ponte osteotomies) to increase spinal flexibility in scoliosis surgery.

Sagittal spinal profile and spinopelvic balance in parents of scoliotic children

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

It is well known that spinal biomechanics and familial predisposition play an important role in the onset and evolution of idiopathic scoliosis. The relationship between the sagittal profile of the spine and spinal biomechanics has also been established in a number of studies. It has been suggested previously that a certain sagittal spinal configuration with implications for spinal rotational stiffness is inherited, thus providing a possible explanation for the well-known hereditary component in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that the familial trend in AIS may be partially explained by the inheritance of a sagittal spinal profile, which has been shown to make the spine less resistant to rotatory decompensation.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective case controlled radiographic analysis of the sagittal profile of the spine and spinopelvic alignment.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred two parents of scoliotic children, compared with 102 age-matched controls (parents of nonscoliotic children).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiologic measures: sagittal profile of the spine and spinopelvic alignment.

METHODS

Freestanding lateral radiographs of 51 parent couples of girls with severe (Cobb angle >30°) progressive AIS (AIS group) and 102 age-matched controls (control group) were taken. Parents with manifest spinal deformities or spinal pathology of any kind were excluded based on history or spinal X-ray to avoid distorted sagittal images with unreliable measurements. Values were calculated for thoracic kyphosis (T4-T12), lumbar lordosis (L1-L5), spinal balance (sagittal plumb line of C7 and T4, T1-L5 sagittal spinal inclination, T9 sagittal offset), curvature parameters (expressed in the area under the curve [AUC]), and pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope). In addition, the height, offset, and length of the posteriorly inclined spinal segment, inclination of each vertebra, and normalized sagittal spinal profile were calculated. Differences in spinopelvic alignment between fathers and mothers of both groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the fathers of the AIS group, the plumb line of T4 was significantly less posteriorly positioned relative to the hip axis (79 mm vs. 92 mm; p=.009); the overall AUC and the lumbar AUC were significantly smaller (p=.002 and p=.008, respectively) as compared with the fathers in the control group. Vertebrae T11-L2 were significantly less backwardly inclined in the fathers of the AIS group (T11, L2: p<.05 and T12-L1: p<.01). An analysis of sagittal spinal profile showed a significantly flatter spine in the fathers of the AIS group (p=.01). No significant differences were observed in height, offset, and length of the backwardly inclined spinal segment. In the mothers of the AIS group, no statistically significant differences were observed in the spinopelvic parameters, spinal curvature, inclination of the vertebrae, and declive spinal segment parameters or sagittal spinal profile as compared with the mothers in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The sagittal spinal profile of the fathers of scoliotic children was significantly flatter than the sagittal spinal profile of fathers of nonscoliotic children. No difference was found in the sagittal spinal profile of the mothers of scoliotic children as compared with mothers of nonscoliotic children. Although it is well known that scoliotic mothers have an increased risk of having a scoliotic offspring, this study indicates that fathers may possibly contribute as well through their sagittal spinal profile to the inheritance of idiopathic scoliosis.