Relationship of acute type A aortic dissection and disseminated intravascular coagulation

OBJECTIVE

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a critical disease presenting with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, the relationship between the degree of DIC and false lumen conditions remains unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the degree of preoperative DIC and the outcomes of ATAAD treatment.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients with ATAAD (70 men and 54 women) treated from January 2012 to January 2020 were included in the present study. The correlation between the preoperative Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC score and the false lumen diameter and length, measured using preoperative computed tomography, was examined retrospectively. The correlations were calculated using liner regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups: a low JAAM DIC score group and a high JAAM DIC score group. The preoperative JAAM DIC scores in the high- and low-score groups were 4.8 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 2.3, respectively (P < .001). The 5-year survival rates and aortic event-free rates in the low-score group were favorable compared with the high-score group; however, the differences were not statistically significant (80.8% vs 54.5%, P = .065; 63.9% vs 59.8%, P = .15, respectively). The false lumen diameter in the ascending aorta was greater in the high-score group than that in the low-score group (P < .05). The JAAM DIC score correlated significantly with the ascending false lumen diameter and the dissection length (r = 0.32 and P < .001; r = 0.29 and P = .001, respectively). A high JAAM DIC score was associated with communicating-type ATAAD (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that high preoperative JAAM DIC scores are associated with a large false lumen and communicating-type ATAAD.

Genetic variants in Chinese patients with sporadic Stanford type A aortic dissection

Background

Genetic disorders are strongly associated with aortic disease. However, the identities of genetic mutations in sporadic Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD) are not clear. The present study analysed the possible genetic mutations of the known pathogenic genes of aortic disease and the clinical characteristics in patients with sporadic STAAD.

Methods

We analysed genetic mutations in 26 genes that underlie aortic aneurysms and dissections in 100 sporadic STAAD patients and 568 healthy controls after whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Clinical features and in-hospital death were determined in all STAAD patients.

Results

In total, 60 suspicious pathogenic mutations (56 novel and 4 previously reported) in 19 genes were identified in 50% (50/100) of patients, and 14 patients had more than 1 mutation. The ascending aortic diameter was extended in patients with mutations (49.1±12.3 vs. 43.7±11.2 mm, P=0.023), and the DeBakey type I phenotype was more common in patients with mutations in genes that coded extracellular matrix (ECM) components than in patients with mutations in other genes (96.6% vs. 66.7%, P=0.007). Patients with fibrillin-1 (FBN1) mutations were younger than patients without FBN1 mutations (44.7±11.0 vs. 53.5±12.1, P=0.030). Subgroup analyses revealed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in mutation carriers (44.4% vs. 10.5%, P=0.029) but only in patients who received conservative treatment.

Conclusions

Half of Chinese patients with a sporadic form of STAAD may carry mutations in known pathogenic genes of aortic disease, and these patients may exhibit distinct clinical features and poor clinical outcomes with the use of conservative treatment.

Clinical Efficacy of Hybrid Surgery for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of hybrid surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection were selected. All patients had completed or undergone hybrid surgery, including extracorporeal circulation, treatment of proximal anastomosis of ascending aorta and the distal anastomosis of the ascending aorta, management of the branch vessels on the arch, aortic endovascular repair. This study analyzed the time of surgery and awake, blood transfusion during surgery, patient's drainage, complications and CTA of aorta was re-examined about one month after operation during patients follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the operation successfully. One patient died of renal failure after the operation. Two patients experienced postoperative neurological complications (anxiety and delirium). Renal function was abnormal in two patients, and one patient needed bedside blood filtration. The serum creatinine levels temporarily increased in seven patients. No stent migration was found during patient follow-up. There was no shift in the stents. The near end of the interlayer was well sealed, without leakage of contrast agent, and the false lumen near the stent was completely thrombosed. Compared with the pre-operative CTA, the true lumen was enlarged and the false lumen was reduced, and the false lumen was completely thrombosed in the proximal end and near the stent. Contrast media was seen in the false lumen.

CONCLUSION

One-stage hybrid surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection can avoid deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, shorten operation time, reduce operation trauma, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. This treatment has a effective treatment effect in the short term. However, the limitations imposed by covered stent materials mean that the treatment's long-term effect is not yet clear, and further research is needed.

European registry of type A aortic dissection (ERTAAD) - rationale, design and definition criteria

Background

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition. Surgery is usually performed as a salvage procedure and is associated with significant postoperative early mortality and morbidity. Understanding the patient’s conditions and treatment strategies which are associated with these adverse events is essential for an appropriate management of acute TAAD.

Methods

Nineteen centers of cardiac surgery from seven European countries have collaborated to create a multicentre observational registry (ERTAAD), which will enroll consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD from January 2005 to March 2021. Analysis of the impact of patient’s comorbidities, conditions at referral, surgical strategies and perioperative treatment on the early and late adverse events will be performed. The investigators have developed a classification of the urgency of the procedure based on the severity of preoperative hemodynamic conditions and malperfusion secondary to acute TAAD. The primary clinical outcomes will be in-hospital mortality, late mortality and reoperations on the aorta. Secondary outcomes will be stroke, acute kidney injury, surgical site infection, reoperation for bleeding, blood transfusion and length of stay in the intensive care unit.

Discussion

The analysis of this multicentre registry will allow conclusive results on the prognostic importance of critical preoperative conditions and the value of different treatment strategies to reduce the risk of early adverse events after surgery for acute TAAD. This registry is expected to provide insights into the long-term durability of different strategies of surgical repair for TAAD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831073.

Characteristics of the Inter-arm Difference in Blood Pressure in Acute Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

An inter-arm difference in blood pressure (IADBP) is characteristic of acute aortic dissection (AAD), but which arm shows lower blood pressure (BP) and the mechanism of IADBP has not been fully elucidatedMethods: We identified consecutive patients with chest and/or back pain and suspected acute cardiovascular disease whose BP had been measured in both arms. We retrospectively compared the characteristics of such patients with AAD (n=93) to those without (non-AAD group, n=122). Additionally, we separately compared patients with type A AAD (TAAD group, n=58) or type B AAD (TBAD group, n=35) to non-AAD group. Characteristics included in these comparisons were patients' backgrounds and IADBP-related factors such as systolic BP (SBP) in the right arm (R) and left arm (L), R-L or L-R as the IADBP. Computed tomography (CT) findings of AD extending to the brachiocephalic artery (BCA) and/or left subclavian artery (LSCA) were examined in patients having IADBP.

RESULTS

In the TAAD group, the prevalence of R<130mmHg (38%-vs.-19%, p=0.009), L-R>15mmHg (19%-vs.-8%, p=0.047), L-R>20mmHg (14%-vs.-4%, p=0.029) was higher than in the non-AAD group. Multivariate analysis showed L-R>15mmHg with R<130mmHg was independently associated with TAAD (OR 25.97, 95% CI 2.45-275.67, p=0.007). However, IADBP-related factors were not associated with TBAD. AAD patients with L-R>20mmHg were all TAAD, and all aortic dissection extended to BCA just before the right common carotid artery on CT.

CONCLUSIONS

IADBP was characterized by R<L with low R in TAAD, but was not associated with TBAD.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular interventions for Stanford type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The standard surgical approach to Stanford type A aortic dissection is open repair. However, up to one in four patients will be declined surgery because of prohibitive risk. Patients who are treated nonoperatively have an unacceptably high mortality. Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is emerging as an alternative treatment for a select group of patients. The reported rates of technical success, mortality, stroke, and reintervention have varied. The objective of the study was to systematically report outcomes for acute type A dissections repaired using an endovascular approach.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. We performed online literature database searches through April 2020. The demographic and procedural characteristics of the individual studies were tabulated. Data on technical success, short-term mortality, stroke, and reintervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 80 cases of aortic dissection (55 acute and 25 subacute) were included in the final analysis. A wide variation was found in technique and device design across the studies. The outcomes rates were estimated at 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-26%) for mortality, 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) for technical failure, 11% (95% CI, 6%-19%) for stroke and 18% (95% CI, 9%-31%) for reintervention. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 13.9 ± 3.2.

CONCLUSION

The technique for endovascular repair of type A aortic dissection is feasible and reproducible. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for inoperable patients who otherwise would have an extremely poor prognosis. Data from clinical trials are required before the technique can be introduced into routine clinical practice.

[Lumbar Back Pain and Impaired Vision - an Alarming Differential Diagnosis]

Lumbar Back Pain and Impaired Vision - an Alarming Differential Diagnosis Abstract. Aortic dissection is much less common than other causes of back pain, yet associated with a high mortality. Despite major advances in noninvasive imaging, the correct diagnosis is made in less than half of the cases. End-organ malperfusion can lead to a broad spectrum of symptoms making diagnosis difficult. This clinical case illustrates the importance of a careful history and thorough clinical examination, as well as noninvasive imaging without delay in order to improve the prognosis and chances of survival.

Acute aortic dissection type A: case series and insights on incidence, management and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates, despite significant advances in surgical approaches. The understanding of the clinical presentation and outcomes is crucial in order to upgrade management strategies. However, epidemiological data regarding AAD occurrence are scarce in Europe, highlighting the gap of evidence in the existing guidelines.

CASE SERIES

We investigated 197 consecutive patients admitted to our institution from January 2018 to December 2019 with suspicion of type A AAD, conducting a retrospective case series. All demographic characteristics, as well as the outcomes of these patients, were recorded and further analyzed to deliver data on the epidemiology of AAD. A total of 197 patients were admitted to our hospital with a suspected AAD. Forty-one (25.9 %) patients presented with a dilated aortic lumen or with a previously repaired aortic dissection, while 28 patients (14.2 %) were diagnosed with AAD (14 patients with type A AAD, 13 with type B AAD and 1 with intramural hematoma). Among 14 patients with type A AAD, nine patients (64.0 %) were treated surgically, while the rest were managed conservatively due to futile clinical status or inability for immediate transportation to a surgical facility. The most frequent initial symptom was chest pain in 86.0 % of patients, followed by dyspnea in 42.9 %. Post-surgical mortality was 33.0 %, while all patients that were managed conservatively did not survive. D-dimers on arrival were significantly lower among patients who survived compared to those who did not.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of type A AAD in our case series was consistent with the one demonstrated in other international cohorts; however, the mortality in our patient group was higher. Our results encourage surgical treatment due to a lower in-hospital mortality rate when compared to conservative treatment. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (1):42-46.

The Penn Classification Predicts Hospital Mortality in Acute Stanford Type A and Type B Aortic Dissections

OBJECTIVES

Mortality in acute aortic dissection varies depending on anatomic location, extent, and associated complications. The Stanford classification guides surgical versus medical management. The Penn classification stratifies mortality risk in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissections undergoing surgery. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the Penn classification can predict hospital mortality in patients with acute Stanford type A and type B aortic dissections undergoing surgical or medical management.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care, university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with acute aortic dissection between January 2008 and December 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Examination of hospital mortality after surgical or medical management.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-two patients had confirmed dissections (186 type A, 166 type B). The overall mortality was 18.8% for type A and 13.3% for type B. Penn class A patients with type A or type B dissections undergoing surgical repair had the lowest mortality (both 3.1%). Penn class B, C, or B+C patients with type A dissections and Penn class B+C patients with type B dissections undergoing medical management had the greatest incidence of mortality (50.0%-57.1%). All others had intermediate mortality (6.7%-39.3%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Penn class B, C, and B+C patients had a greater odds of mortality and predicted mortality than did Penn class A patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Penn classification predicts hospital mortality in patients with acute Stanford type A or type B aortic dissections undergoing surgical or medical management. Early endovascular repair may confer lower risk of mortality in patients with type B dissections presenting without ischemia.

Experimental Insight into the Hemodynamics and Perfusion of Radiological Contrast in Patent and Non-patent Aortic Dissection Models

PURPOSE

In a curved vessel such as the aortic arch, the velocity profile closer to the aortic root is normally skewed towards the inner curvature wall, while further downstream along the curve, the velocity profile becomes skewed towards the outer wall. In an aortic dissection (AD) disease, blood velocities in the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) are hypothesized to depend on the proximity of the entry tear to the root of aortic arch. Faster velocity in the FL can lead to higher hemodynamic loading, and pose tearing risk. Furthermore, the luminal velocities control the perfusion rate of radiological contrast media during diagnostic imaging. The objective in this study is to investigate the effect of AD disease morphology and configuration on the blood velocity field in the TL and FL, and on the relative perfusion of radiological enhancement agents through the dissection.

METHODS

Eight in vitro models were studied, including patent and non-patent FL configurations. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to quantify the AD velocity field, while laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) was implemented to visualize dynamical flow phenomena and to quantify the perfusion of injected dye, in mimicry of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

The location of the proximal entry tear along the aortic arch in a patent FL had a dramatic impact on whether the blood velocity was higher in the TL or FL. The luminal velocities were dependent on the entry/reentry tear size combination, with the smaller tear (whether distal or proximal) setting the upper limit on the maximal flow velocity in the FL. Upon merging near the distal reentry tear, the TL/FL velocity differential gave rise to the roll up and shedding of shear layer vortices that convected downstream in close proximity to the wall of the non-dissected aorta. In a non-patent FL, the flow velocity was practically null with all the blood passing through the TL. LIF imaging showed much slower perfusion of contrast dye in the FL compared to the TL. In a patent FL, however, dye had a comparable perfusion rate appearing around the same time as in the TL.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood velocities in the TL and FL were highly sensitive to the exact dissection configuration. Geometric case A1R, which had its proximal entry tear located further downstream along the aortic arch, and had its entry and reentry tears sufficiently sized, exhibited the highest FL flow velocity among the tested models, and it was also higher than in the TL, which suggest that this configuration had elevated hemodynamic loading and risk for tearing. In contrast-enhanced diagnostic imaging, a time-delayed acquisition protocol is recommended to improve the detection of suspected cases with a non-patent FL.

Successful Tissue Plasminogen Activator for a Patient with Stroke After Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Treatment

Some stroke patients with the acute aortic dissection receiving thrombolysis treatment resulted in fatalities. Thus, the concurrent acute aortic dissection is the contraindication for the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. However, the safety and the effectiveness of the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy are not known in patients with stroke some days after acute aortic dissection treatment. Here, we first report a case of a man with a cardioembolism due to the nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, who received the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy 117 days after the traumatic Stanford type A acute aortic dissection operation. Without the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy, the prognosis was expected to be miserable. However, the outcome was good with no complication owing to the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy. Our case suggests the effectiveness and the safety of the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy to the ischemic stroke some days after acute aortic dissection treatment.

Giant cell aortitis leading to Stanford type B and type A aortic dissection

This report provides a rare histological example and the appropriate management of spontaneous aortic dissection secondary to giant cell arteritis.

The effect of admission serum potassium levels on in-hospital and long-term mortality in type A acute aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Mild fluctuations in serum potassium (K⁺) levels are related to the prognosis of cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to determine the effect of admission serum potassium levels on in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 588 consecutive patients with type A AAD were enrolled, and they were grouped according to admission serum potassium level: <3.5, 3.5 to <4.0, 4.0 to <4.5, 4.5 to <5.0, and ≥5.0mmol/L. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital death and long-term all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality rates were 10.7% and 16.3%, respectively. A U-shaped relationship was observed between admission serum potassium levels and both in-hospital death and long-term mortality. Univariate Cox regression identified potassium levels outside the interval of <3.5 to 4.5mmol/L to be a risk factor for both in-hospital and long-term death. After adjusting for age, gender, surgery and other risk factors, potassium levels outside the interval of <3.5 to 4.5mmol/L still had a significant association with long-term death [hazard ratio (HR)=1.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.07-2.74, P=0.024]. Surgical intervention was the main protective factor associated with both in-hospital (HR=0.01, 95% CI 0.01-0.06, P<0.001) and long-term survival (HR=0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.12, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with Stanford type A AAD, admission serum potassium levels other than 3.5 to 4.5mmol/L might be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death and long-term mortality.

Onset seasons and clinical outcomes in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection: an observational retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of onset season with clinical outcome in type A acute aortic dissection (AAD).

DESIGN

A single-centre, observational retrospective study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in Fuwai Hospital, the National Centre for Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.

PARTICIPANTS

From 2008 to 2010, a set of consecutive patients with type A AAD, confirmed by CT scanning, were enrolled and divided into four groups according to onset season: winter (December, January and February), spring (March, April and May), summer (June, July and August) and autumn (September, October and November). The primary end points were in-hospital death and all-cause mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 492 cases in this study, 129 occurred in winter (26.2%), 147 in spring (29.9%), 92 in summer (18.7%), and 124 in autumn (25.2%). After a median follow-up of 20.4 months (IQR 9.7-38.9), the in-hospital mortality in cases occurring in autumn was higher than in the other three seasons (23.4% vs 8.4%, p<0.01). Long-term mortality was comparable among the four seasonal groups (p=0.63). After adjustment for age, gender and other risk factors, onset in autumn was still an independent factor associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.64, p=0.02) in addition to surgical treatment. Further analysis showed that the seasonal effect on in-hospital mortality (autumn vs other seasons: 57.4% vs 27.3%, p<0.01) was only significant in patients who did not receive surgical treatment. No seasonal effect on long-term clinical outcomes was found in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Onset in autumn may be a factor that increases the risk of in-hospital death from type A AAD, especially in patients who receive conservative treatment. Immediate surgery improves the short-term and long-term outcomes regardless of onset season.

Acute type A aortic dissection: characteristics and outcomes comparing patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcome of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) suffering acute dissection in comparison with their tricuspid peers.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2011, 460 consecutive patients underwent emergency repair for acute type A aortic dissection. In 379 patients without connective tissue disease, the aortic valve morphology could clearly be specified (91.6% tricuspid and 8.4% bicuspid).

RESULTS

At the time of dissection, patients with a bicuspid valve were younger (46.7 ± 13 vs 61.6 ± 12 years, P < 0.001) with the entry tear more often located in the root compared with those with a tricuspid valve (bicuspid: 31.3% vs tricuspid: 6.3%, P < 0.001). Consequently, surgical repair warranted root replacement in 93.8% of bicuspid vs 28.8% of tricuspid valve patients (P < 0.001). The leading pathology was medial necrosis/degeneration in bicuspid and atherosclerosis in tricuspid patients (P = 0.166). Hospital mortality was 20.3% and not significantly different between the two valve morphologies, even despite the younger age of bicuspid patients: 28.1% among bicuspids vs 19.6% among tricuspids (P = 0.255). Survival after discharge was 63.3% at 10 years for all patients. BAV patients had a significantly better survival with 100% at 10 years compared with 60.2% in tricuspid valve patients (P = 0.011). Mean follow-up among survivors was comparable for bicuspid and tricuspid patients (3.7 and 4.1 years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BAV have a distinctive dissection pattern with the entry tear frequently located in the aortic root and-despite their younger age-are subject to substantial hospital mortality. For bicuspid patients suffering from dissection, composite root replacement yields an excellent outcome equal to an age- and gender-matched normal population.