The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid utilization in total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is still a lack of information on the role of Tranexamic acid (TXA) in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The purpose of this study is to comprehensively review, consolidate, and analyze findings from existing research on the effectiveness and safety of TXA in TAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, for original, English-language studies investigating the efficacy and safety of TXA in TAA, through February 2023. Evaluated data for the meta-analysis included estimated blood loss (EBL), change in perioperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion, and complications including DVT/PE, and wound complications.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were included in this study. In total, 450 TAA were included, with 244 receiving TXA (54.2%) and 206 not receiving TXA (45.8%). TXA in TAA significantly decreased EBL. A significantly lower rate of wound complications in the TXA group with the relative risk (RR) of 0.51. We classified wound complications into wound infection and delayed wound healing/dehiscence. A significant decrease in the rate of wound infection and a tendency showing a decrease in the rate of delayed wound healing/dehiscence in the TXA group were noted: the RR of 0.29, and 0.63, respectively. TXA did not increase the incidence of DVT/PE following TAA.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the utilization of TXA during TAA demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in EBL and relative risk for wound complications. However, further RCTs with larger sample sizes will be necessary to establish a more robust conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of TXA in TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intradermal injection of tranexamic acid versus platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of melasma: a split-face comparative study

Millions of people throughout the world suffer from the acquired condition of hyperpigmentation known as melasma. Melasma is characterized by symmetrically oriented hyperpigmented macules and patches. Many treatment options are available with variable degrees of efficacy and tolerability. The aim of the work was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of intradermal tranexamic acid (TXA) versus intradermal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of various types of melasma. The current split-face prospective study included 40 cases with melasma. Tranexamic acid (TXA) was injected intradermally into the right side of the face by using a concentration of 4 mg/ml, while platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was injected intradermally into the left side. In both sides, a total of three sessions of treatment were provided, once every 4 weeks. Digital photographs were taken before each treatment session and 3 months after the last session. The modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) grading system and dermoscopy were used to assess the improvement in the condition. The disease severity and percentage of improvement were assessed by mMASI score before and after therapy across both sides of the face. along with determining the degree of satisfaction and side effects among the included cases. The mean mMASI score before therapy in the TXA side was 4.59 ± 2.87, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score before therapy was 4.72 ± 2.72 with no statistically significant difference between the two sides (p = 0.841). After 3 months of treatment, the mean mMASI score in the TXA-treated side was 2.49 ± 1.58 with a mean percentage of decrease of 45.67 ± 8.10%, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score after treatment was 2.17 ± 1.41 with a mean percentage of decrease of 53.66 ± 11.27%. There was a high statistically significant decrease in the mMASI score after treatment on both sides (p < 0.001); however, the percentage of score reduction in the PRP side compared to the TXA side was statistically higher. Intradermal injection with PRP revealed higher efficacy in the treatment of melasma as compared to TXA injection with no significant difference regarding the associated side effects.

Oral tranexamic acid for an additional 24 hours postoperatively versus a single preoperative intravenous dose for reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled trial (TRAC-24)

AIMS

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), blood loss continues internally after surgery is complete. Typically, the total loss over 48 postoperative hours can be around 1,300 ml, with most occurring within the first 24 hours. We hypothesize that the full potential of tranexamic acid (TXA) to decrease TKA blood loss has not yet been harnessed because it is rarely used beyond the intraoperative period, and is usually withheld from 'high-risk' patients with a history of thromboembolic, cardiovascular, or cerebrovascular disease, a patient group who would benefit greatly from a reduced blood loss.

METHODS

TRAC-24 was a prospective, phase IV, single-centre, open label, parallel group, randomized controlled trial on patients undergoing TKA, including those labelled as high-risk. The primary outcome was indirect calculated blood loss (IBL) at 48 hours. Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA at the time of surgery and an additional 24-hour postoperative oral regime of four 1 g doses, while Group 2 only received the intraoperative dose and Group 3 did not receive any TXA.

RESULTS

Between July 2016 and July 2018, 552 patients were randomized to either Group 1 (n = 241), Group 2 (n = 243), or Group 3 (n = 68), and 551 were included in the final analysis. The blood loss did differ significantly between the two intervention groups (733.5 ml (SD 384.0) for Group 1 and 859.2 ml (SD 363.6 ml) for Group 2; mean difference -125.8 ml (95% confidence interval -194.0 to -57.5; p < 0.001). No differences in mortality or thromboembolic events were observed in any group.

CONCLUSION

These data support the hypothesis that in TKA, a TXA regime consisting of IV 1 g perioperatively and four oral 1 g doses over 24 hours postoperatively significantly reduces blood loss beyond that achieved with a single IV 1 g perioperative dose alone. TXA appears safe in patients with history of thromboembolic, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1595-1603.

Oral tranexamic acid for an additional 24 hours postoperatively versus a single preoperative intravenous dose for reducing blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled trial (TRAC-24)

AIMS

A typical pattern of blood loss associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) is 200 ml intraoperatively and 1.3 l in the first 48 postoperative hours. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is most commonly given as a single preoperative dose only and is often withheld from patients with a history of thromboembolic disease as they are perceived to be "high-risk" with respect to postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRanexamic ACid for 24 hours trial (TRAC-24) aimed to identify if an additional 24-hour postoperative TXA regime could further reduce blood loss beyond a once-only dose at the time of surgery, without excluding these high-risk patients.

METHODS

TRAC-24 was a prospective, phase IV, single centre, open label, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving patients undergoing primary unilateral elective THA. The primary outcome measure was the indirect calculated blood loss (IBL) at 48 hours. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA at the time of surgery and an additional oral regime for 24 hours postoperatively, group 2 only received the intraoperative dose, and group 3 did not receive any TXA.

RESULTS

A total of 534 patients were randomized, with 233 in group 1, 235 in group 2, and 66 in group 3; 92 patients (17.2%) were considered high-risk. The mean IBL did not differ significantly between the two intervention groups (848.4 ml (SD 463.8) for group 1, and 843.7 ml (SD 478.7) for group 2; mean difference -4.7 ml (95% confidence interval -82.9 to 92.3); p = 0.916). No differences in mortality or incidence of VTE were observed between any group.

CONCLUSION

The addition of oral TXA for 24 hours postoperatively does not reduce blood loss beyond that achieved with a single 1 g IV perioperative dose alone. There may be a clinically relevant difference in patients with a normal BMI, which warrants further investigation. Critically, there were no safety issues in patients with a history of thromboembolic, cardiovascular, or cerebrovascular disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1197-1205.

Combined intravenous, topical and oral tranexamic acid administration in total knee replacement: Evaluation of safety in patients with previous thromboembolism and effect on hemoglobin level and transfusion rate

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to investigate the safety of combined intravenous, oral and topical tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total knee replacement. We assessed dose-related efficacy on hemoglobin level, transfusion, length of stay and thromboembolic complications. In addition, TXA safety in patients with previous history of thromboembolism >12months ago was monitored specifically.

METHODS

From January 2013 until January 2016, 922 patients were included who received TXA after primary total knee replacement. Patients without TXA administration or with thromboembolic events <12months ago were excluded. TXA dosage groups were divided into ≤10mg/kg, >10-25mg/kg and >25-50mg/kg.

RESULTS

Between the three TXA groups no significant difference was found in thromboembolic complications (deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)), wound leakage and transfusion rate. For patients with DVT or PE in their history >12months ago specifically, no more complications were noted in higher-TXA-dosage groups compared to the low-dosage group. Length of stay was shorter in the highest-TXA-dosage group compared with lower-dosage groups (median two vs three days). With high TXA dose a smaller difference between pre- and postoperative Hb was found: the >25-50mg/kg TXA group had a 0.419mmol/l smaller decrease in postoperative hemoglobin compared to the lowest-dosage group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combined intravenous, oral and topical TXA is effective in knee replacement and can safely be given to patients with a thromboembolic history >12months ago. High dosage (>25-50mg/kg) TXA resulted in the smallest decrease in postoperative hemoglobin.

Clinical and instrumental evaluation of two different regimens of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a single-centre, prospective, randomized study with 80 patients

PURPOSE

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can significantly reduce blood losses with many clinical and economical advantages. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal regimen for TXA administration. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the haemostatic effect of two different intravenous (IV) regimens of TXA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We planned a single-centre, prospective, randomized study including 80 patients who underwent primary unilateral minimally invasive THA because of a hip osteoarthritic degeneration. We divided patients into two groups: the G10 group received two IV doses of 10 mg/kg of TXA, and the G20 group received two doses of 20 mg/kg.

RESULTS

No significant differences in mean minimum levels of Hb and HcT stratified by days after surgery were uncovered between the two groups despite the use of two different dosages of TXA. Also the mean blood volume loss was statistically similar between two groups. No differences were also observed regarding the occurrence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In two IV bolus regimens of TXA administration, the use of a dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg provides statistically similar results in blood loss sparing. Therefore, the use of two 10 mg/kg doses could be considered more advisable in order to reduce the potential thromboembolic risks related to this drug.