In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and comparators toward carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

IMPORTANCE

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the in vitro activity of two novel antimicrobial drugs, including imipenem-relebactam (IMR) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZA), toward carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) strains. Our in vitro activity study revealed that only few antibacterial agents (including several novel agents) exhibit high antimicrobial activity toward carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and CR-hvKP isolates. IMR and AZA may be promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of infections caused by CRKP and CR-hvKP isolates.

Antimicrobial Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales Analyzed by ICU and Non-ICU Wards, Infection Sources, and Geographic Regions: ATLAS Program 2016-2020

Increasing antimicrobial resistance among multidrug-resistant (MDR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), in particular metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-positive strains, has led to limited treatment options in these isolates. This study evaluated the activity of aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) and comparator antimicrobials against Enterobacterales isolates and key resistance phenotypes stratified by wards, infection sources and geographic regions as part of the ATLAS program between 2016 and 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The susceptibility of antimicrobials were interpreted using CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. A tentative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of 8 µg/mL was considered for ATM-AVI activity. ATM-AVI inhibited ≥99.2% of Enterobacterales isolates across wards and ≥99.7% isolates across infection sources globally and in all regions at ≤8 µg/mL. For resistance phenotypes, ATM-AVI demonstrated sustained activity across wards and infection sources by inhibiting ≥98.5% and ≥99.1% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, ≥98.6% and ≥99.1% of ESBL-positive isolates, ≥96.8% and ≥90.9% of carbapenem-resistant (CR) isolates, and ≥96.8% and ≥97.4% of MBL-positive isolates, respectively, at ≤8 µg/mL globally and across regions. Overall, our study demonstrated that ATM-AVI represents an important therapeutic option for infections caused by Enterobacterales, including key resistance phenotypes across different wards and infection sources.

Steno-sphere: Navigating the enigmatic world of emerging multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first-line agents, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam- avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug-resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in-vitro and sparse in-vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019

Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 1,202 Enterobacterales isolates, including 10 genera or species, were collected from 26 hospitals that cover seven regions of China. The susceptibilities of the 30 antimicrobial agents were interpreted based on the combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The results indicated that all Enterobacterales isolates showed high susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (98.25%), eravacycline (85.69%), and cefoselis (62.73%). The first two antimicrobial agents also demonstrated potent activities against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales independent of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The rates of susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis were lowest in Morganella spp. (84.42%), Proteus spp. (33.65%), and Escherichia coli (40.14%), respectively. In general, the lower rates of susceptibility to eravacycline and cefoselis were in the older inpatient group. The strains isolated from urinary tract exhibited the lowest rate of susceptibility (78.97%) to eravacycline, and the lowest rate of susceptibility (45.83%) to cefoselis was observed in nervous system specimens. The strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) wards showed significantly reduced susceptibility to cefoselis compared with those isolated from non-ICU wards. The MIC values of aztreonam-avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam have poor consistency (weighted kappa = 0.243), as did eravacycline and tigecycline (weighted kappa = 0.478). Cefoselis and cefepime showed highly similar activities against Enterobacterales (weighted kappa = 0.801). Our results support the clinical development of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent. Our results show that the novel antimicrobial agents aztreonam-avibactam and eravacycline retain activities against MDR and CRE isolates, including carbapenemase producers and non-carbapenemase producers. Further analysis combined with clinical information on the strains tested revealed that no significant differences were observed in susceptibility rates of strains with different demographic parameters to aztreonam-avibactam. Age, specimen source, and department were associated with the susceptibility of strains to eravacycline and cefoselis (P ≤ 0.01). Compared with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam has its advantages and limitations against Enterobacterales. The potent activity of eravacycline against Enterobacterales was higher than that of tigecycline. Cefoselis and cefepime showed a highly consistent activity against Enterobacterales.

NDM-35-Producing ST167 Escherichia coli Highly Resistant to β-Lactams Including Cefiderocol

A multidrug-resistant (carbapenems, aztreonam + avibactam, and cefiderocol) ST167 Escherichia coli clinical isolate recovered from a patient hospitalized in Switzerland produced NDM-35 showing ca. 10-fold increased hydrolytic activity toward cefiderocol compared to NDM-1. The isolate co-produced a CMY-type β-lactamase, exhibited a four amino-acid insertion in PBP3, and possessed a truncated iron transporter CirA protein. Our study identified an association of unrelated resistance mechanisms leading to resistance to virtually all β-lactams in a high-risk E. coli clone.

In Vitro Evaluation of the Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam against 341 Recent Clinical Isolates of Anaerobes

Aztreonam-avibactam is under clinical development for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. We evaluated in vitro activity against 341 recent clinical isolates. The addition of avibactam to aztreonam had no effect on the anaerobic activity of aztreonam. IMPORTANCE This work shows that aztreonam-avibactam lacks activity against anaerobic organisms.

In Vitro Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam at Different Inoculum Sizes of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Blood Isolates

β-lactam–avibactam combinations have been proposed as carbapenem-sparing therapies, but little data exist on their in vitro activities in infections with high bacterial inocula. We investigated the in vitro efficacies and the inoculum effects of ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Enterobacterales blood isolates. A total of 228 non-repetitive extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates were prospectively collected in a tertiary center. In vitro susceptibilities to ceftazidime, aztreonam, meropenem, ceftazidime–avibactam, and aztreonam–avibactam were evaluated by broth microdilution method using standard and high inocula. An inoculum effect was defined as an eightfold or greater increase in MIC when tested with the high inoculum. Of the 228 isolates, 99% were susceptible to ceftazidime–avibactam and 99% had low aztreonam–avibactam MICs (≤8 mg/L). Ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam exhibited good in vitro activities; MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ values were 0.5/2 mg/L, 0.125/0.5 mg/L, and ≤0.03/0.25 mg/L, respectively, and aztreonam–avibactam was more active than ceftazidime–avibactam. The frequencies of the inoculum effect with ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam were lower than with meropenem (14% vs. 38%, p < 0.001 and 30% vs. 38%, p = 0.03, respectively). The β-lactam-avibactam combinations could be useful as carbapenem-sparing strategies, and aztreonam–avibactam has the better in vitro activity but is more subject to the inoculum effect than ceftazidime–avibactam.

In Vitro Activity of Auranofin in Combination With Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of aztreonam-avibactam-auranofin (ATM-AVI-AUR) against a collection of 88 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) clinical isolates and 6 in vitro selected ATM-AVI-resistant CPE with CMY-16 Tyr150Ser and Asn346His mutants or transformants.

Methods

MICs of imipenem, ceftazidime-avibact8am (CAZ-AVI), ATM-AVI, CAZ-AVI-AUR and ATM-AVI-AUR were determined via the broth microdilution method. Genetic background and carbapenemase genes were determined by PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Results

AUR alone showed little antibacterial activity with AUR MICs were greater than 64 μg/mL for all the 88 clinical CPE isolates. The addition of AUR (16 μg/mL) resulted in an 3-folding dilutions MIC reduction of ATM-AVI MIC₅₀ (0.5 to 0.0625 μg/mL) and a 2-folding dilutions MIC reduction of MIC₉₀ (1 to 0.25 μg/mL) against all 88 clinical CPE isolates, respectively. Notably, the reduced ATM-AVI MIC values were mainly found in MBL-producers, and the MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ reduced by 2-folding dilutions (0.25 to 0.0625 μg/mL) and 3-folding dilutions (2 to 0.25 μg/mL) respectively by AUR among the 51 MBL-producers. By contrast, the addition of AUR did not showed significant effects on ATM-AVI MIC₅₀ (0.0625 μg/mL) and MIC₉₀ (0.125 μg/mL) among single KPC-producers. Interestingly, the addition of AUR restored the ATM-AVI susceptibility against the 6 in vitro selected ATM-AVI-resistant CMY-16 Tyr150Ser and Asn346His mutants or transfromants, with the MICs reduced from ≥32 μg/mL (32->256 μg/mL) to ≤8 μg/mL (0.0625-8 μg/mL).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that AUR potentiated the activities of CAZ-AVI and ATM-AVI against MBL-producing isolates in vitro. Importantly, AUR restored the ATM-AVI activity against ATM-AVI resistant mutant strains. As a clinically approved drug, AUR might be repurposed in combination with ATM-AVI to treat infections caused by highly resistant MBL-producing Enterobacterales.

Aztreonam-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing Program for Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales in the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network, March 2019 to December 2020

Aztreonam-avibactam is a drug combination pending phase 3 clinical trials and is suggested for treatment of severe infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales by combining ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. Beginning in 2019, four Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network regional laboratories offered aztreonam-avibactam susceptibility testing by broth microdilution. For 64 clinical isolates tested, the MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values of aztreonam-avibactam were 0.5/4 μg/ml and 8/4 μg/ml, respectively. Aztreonam-avibactam displayed potent in vitro activity against the MBL-producing Enterobacterales tested.

In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZT-AVI) are novel antibiotic combinations active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate their in vitro activities and inoculum effects in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including carbapenemase-producing (CP)-CRE and non-CP-CRE. A total of 81 independent clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected. CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by broth microdilution using standard and high inocula. The inoculum effect was defined as an ≥8-fold increase in MIC with high inoculum. Phenotypic determination of β-lactam resistance mechanism and PCR for carbapenemase genes were performed. Of the 81 CRE isolates, 35 (43%) were CP-CRE. Overall, 73% of the isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, and 95% had low AZT-AVI MICs (≤8 µg/mL). The MIC_50/MIC₉₀s of CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 4/≥512 µg/mL and 0.5/4 µg/mL, respectively. CAZ-AVI was more active against non-CP-CRE than against CP-CRE (susceptibility 80% vs. 63%, p = 0.08; MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 2/16 μg/mL vs. 4/≥512 μg/mL), whereas AZT-AVI was more active against CP-CRE (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 0.25/1 μg/mL vs. 0.5/8 μg/mL). All four isolates with high AZT-AVI MIC (≥16 μg/mL) were resistant to CAZ-AVI, but only 18% (4/22) of CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates had high AZT-AVI MIC. The rates of the inoculum effect for CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 18% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the frequency of the AZT-AVI inoculum effect was higher in K. pneumoniae than E. coli (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). AZT-AVI is more active against CRE than CAZ-AVI, even in CP-CRE and CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. The presence of a substantial inoculum effect may contribute to clinical failure in high-inoculum infections treated with AZT-AVI.

Genetic Features Leading to Reduced Susceptibility to Aztreonam-Avibactam among Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates

Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates resistant to the newly developed β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor drug combination aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) have been reported. Here, we analyzed a series of 118 clinical MBL-producing E. coli isolates of various geographical origins for susceptibility to ATM-AVI. The nature of the PBP3 protein sequence and the occurrence of bla _CMY genes for susceptibility to ATM-AVI were investigated. We showed here that elevated MICs of ATM-AVI among MBL-producing E. coli isolates resulted from a combination of different features, including modification of PBP3 protein sequence through specific amino acid insertions and production of CMY-type enzymes, particularly, CMY-42. We showed here that those insertions identified in the PBP3 sequence are not considered the unique basis of resistance to ATM-AVI, but they significantly contribute to it.

Struggle To Survive: the Choir of Target Alteration, Hydrolyzing Enzyme, and Plasmid Expression as a Novel Aztreonam-Avibactam Resistance Mechanism

Aztreonam-avibactam is a promising antimicrobial combination against multidrug-resistant organisms, such as carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales Resistance to aztreonam-avibactam has been found, but the resistance mechanism remains poorly studied. We recovered three Escherichia coli isolates of an almost identical genome but exhibiting varied aztreonam-avibactam resistance. The isolates carried a cephalosporinase gene, bla _CMY-42, on IncIγ plasmids with a single-nucleotide variation in an antisense RNA-encoding gene, inc, of the replicon. The isolates also had four extra amino acids (YRIK) in penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) due to a duplication of a 12-nucleotide (TATCGAATTAAC) stretch in pbp3 By cloning and plasmid-curing experiments, we found that elevated CMY-42 cephalosporinase production or amino acid insertions in PBP3 alone mediated slightly reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, but their combination conferred aztreonam-avibactam resistance. We show that the elevated CMY-42 production results from increased plasmid copy numbers due to mutations in inc We also verified the findings using in vitro mutation assays, in which aztreonam-avibactam-resistant mutants also had mutations in inc and elevated CMY-42 production compared with the parental strain. This choir of target modification, hydrolyzing enzyme, and plasmid expression represents a novel, coordinated, complex antimicrobial resistance mechanism and also reflects the struggle of bacteria to survive under selection pressure imposed by antimicrobial agents.IMPORTANCE Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is a serious global challenge with limited therapeutic options. Aztreonam-avibactam is a promising antimicrobial combination with activity against CPE producing serine-based carbapenemases and metallo-β-lactamases and has the potential to be a major option for combatting CPE. Aztreonam-avibactam resistance has been found, but resistance mechanisms remain largely unknown. Understanding resistance mechanisms is essential for optimizing treatment and developing alternative therapies. Here, we found that either penicillin-binding protein 3 modification or the elevated expression of cephalosporinase CMY-42 due to increased plasmid copy numbers does not confer resistance to aztreonam-avibactam, but their combination does. We demonstrate that increased plasmid copy numbers result from mutations in antisense RNA-encoding inc of the IncIγ replicon. The findings reveal that antimicrobial resistance may be due to concerted combinatorial effects of target alteration, hydrolyzing enzyme, and plasmid expression and also highlight that resistance to any antimicrobial combination will inevitably emerge.

Antimicrobial Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents When Tested against a Large Collection of Contemporary Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates from Medical Centers Worldwide

Aztreonam-avibactam was tested against 1,839 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates collected worldwide and demonstrated potent activity against isolates from all geographic regions and infection types (overall MIC_50/90, 4/4 mg/liter; 97.8% inhibited at ≤8 mg/liter). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (MIC_50/90, ≤0.5/1 mg/liter; 95.4% susceptible) and minocycline (MIC_50/90, 0.5/2 mg/liter; 99.5% susceptible) were also very active. Aztreonam-avibactam inhibited 84.7% of non-TMP-SMX-susceptible isolates at ≤8 mg/liter. Aztreonam-avibactam may represent a valuable option for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, addressing a major unmet medical need.

Validation of Aztreonam-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing Using Digitally Dispensed Custom Panels

Aztreonam-avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent with activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) with metallo-β-lactamases (MβLs). Although aztreonam-avibactam is not yet approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), clinicians can administer this combination by using two FDA-approved drugs: aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam. This combination of drugs is recommended by multiple experts for treatment of serious infections caused by MβL-producing CPE. At present, in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of aztreonam-avibactam is not commercially available; thus, most clinicians receive no laboratory-based guidance that can support consideration of aztreonam-avibactam for serious CPE infections. Here, we report our internal validation for aztreonam-avibactam AST by reference broth microdilution (BMD) according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The validation was performed using custom frozen reference BMD panels prepared in-house at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition, we took this opportunity to evaluate a new panel-making method using a digital dispenser, the Hewlett Packard (HP) D300e. Our studies demonstrate that the performance characteristics of digitally dispensed panels were equivalent to those of conventionally prepared frozen reference BMD panels for a number of drugs, including aztreonam-avibactam. We found the HP D300e digital dispenser to be easy to use and to provide the capacity to prepare complex drug panels. Our findings will help other clinical and public health laboratories implement susceptibility testing for aztreonam-avibactam.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Differences Between Carbapenem-Resistant KPC-2-Producing and NDM-1-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Teaching Hospital in Northeast China

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has become a serious challenge for clinical treatment and public health. We found that both KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) and NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae (NDM-KP) are epidemic in a teaching hospital in Northeast China. The main aim of the present study was to compare antimicrobial susceptibility differences between KPC-KP and NDM-KP and elucidate complex resistant genotypes of the KPC-KP and NDM-KP by PCR and sequencing. Among 82 CRKP isolated between January 2015 and December 2016, 59 isolates were KPC-KP and 23 isolates were NDM-KP. All 59 KPC-KP had no susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, had very low susceptibility to amikacin (3.39%) and fosfomycin (8.47%), whereas the susceptibility of NDM-KP to the above antibiotics was 21.74%, 13.04%, 17.39%, 17.39%, 69.57%, and 73.91%, respectively. Although the susceptibility of NDM-KP to tigecycline (95.65%) and polymyxin B (73.91%) was higher than that of KPC-KP (84.75% and 69.49%, respectively), the difference was not statistically significant. The MIC₉₀ of KPC-KP and NDM-KP to aztreonam-avibactam were 4 and 2 μg/mL, respectively. All 82 CRKP carried 2 or 3 Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) genes, and 79/82 CRKP carried the AmpC gene bla_FOX. The aminoglycoside resistance gene rmtB was detected in 96.61% of KPC-KP and in 21.74% of NDM-KP. It seems that KPC-KP was more resistant to antibiotics than NDM-KP in this study, so that available therapeutic regimens against KPC-KP are very limited. Aztreonam-avibactam may be a promising and valuable option against both KPC-KP and NDM-KP.

Defining the Role of Novel β-Lactam Agents That Target Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against OXA-48-Carrying Enterobacteriaceae Isolated as Part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) Global Surveillance Program from 2012 to 2015

Enterobacteriaceae producing the Ambler class D OXA-48 carbapenemase, combined with additional resistance mechanisms, such as permeability defects or cocarriage of class A, B, or C β-lactamases, can become highly resistant to most β-lactams currently in use, including carbapenems. A total of 45,872 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates collected in 39 countries as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance study in 2012 to 2015 were tested for susceptibility to β-lactams and comparator agents using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methodology and screened for the presence of β-lactamases. The bla _OXA-48 and bla _OXA-48-like genes were detected in 333 isolates across 14 species of Enterobacteriaceae collected in 20 countries across the globe. Few agents tested were effective in vitro against the overall collection of OXA-48-producers (n = 265), with tigecycline (MIC₉₀, 2 µg/ml; 92.5% susceptible), ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC₉₀, 4 µg/ml; 92.5% susceptible), and aztreonam-avibactam (MIC₉₀, 0.5 µg/ml; 99.6% of isolates with MIC ≤8 µg/ml) demonstrating the greatest activity. Similarly, colistin (MIC₉₀, 1 µg/ml; 94.2% susceptible), tigecycline (MIC₉₀, 2 µg/ml; 92.6% susceptible), ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC₉₀, >128 µg/ml; 89.7% susceptible), and aztreonam-avibactam (MIC₉₀, 4 µg/ml; 100% of isolates with MIC ≤8 µg/ml) were most active against OXA-48-like-positive isolates (n = 68). The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam was improved against the subset of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-negative, OXA-48- and OXA-48-like-positive isolates (99.2% and 100% susceptible, respectively). The data reported here support the continued investigation of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carrying OXA-48 and OXA-48-like β-lactamases in combination with serine- or metallo-β-lactamases.

Microdialysis Study of Aztreonam-Avibactam Distribution in Peritoneal Fluid and Muscle of Rats with or without Experimental Peritonitis

The purpose of this study was to investigate aztreonam (ATM) and avibactam (AVI) distribution in intraperitoneal fluid and muscle interstitial fluid by microdialysis in rats, with or without peritonitis, and to compare the unbound concentrations in tissue with the unbound concentrations in blood. Microdialysis probes were inserted into the jugular veins, hind leg muscles, and peritoneal cavities of control rats (n = 5) and rats with intra-abdominal sepsis (n = 9) induced by cecal ligation and punctures. ATM and AVI probe recoveries in each medium were determined for both molecules in each rat by retrodialysis by drug. ATM-AVI combination was administered as an intravenous bolus at a dose of 100-25 mg · kg^-1 Microdialysis samples were collected over 120 min, and ATM-AVI concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted and nonparametric tests were used for statistical comparisons between groups (infected versus control) and medium. ATM and AVI distribution in intraperitoneal fluid and muscle was rapid and complete both in control rats and in rats with peritonitis, and the concentration profiles in blood, intraperitoneal fluid, and muscle were virtually superimposed, in control and infected animals, both for ATM and AVI. No statistically significant difference was observed between unbound tissue extracellular fluid and systemic areas under the curve for both molecules in control and infected animals. In the present study, intraperitoneal infection induced by cecal ligation and puncture had no apparent effect on ATM and AVI pharmacokinetics in rats.

In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in 40 Countries from 2012 to 2015

The combination of the monobactam aztreonam and the non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam is currently in clinical development for the treatment of serious infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, a difficult-to-treat subtype of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae for which therapeutic options are currently very limited. The present study tested clinically significant isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 51,352) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 11,842) collected from hospitalized patients in 208 medical center laboratories from 40 countries from 2012 to 2015 for in vitro susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, aztreonam, and comparator antimicrobial agents using a standard broth microdilution methodology. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml in combination with 2-fold dilutions of aztreonam. The MIC₉₀s of aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam were 0.12 and 64 μg/ml, respectively, for all Enterobacteriaceae isolates; >99.9% of all isolates and 99.8% of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1,498) were inhibited by aztreonam-avibactam at a concentration of ≤8 μg/ml. PCR and DNA sequencing identified 267 Enterobacteriaceae isolates positive for MBL genes (NDM, VIM, IMP); all Enterobacteriaceae carrying MBLs demonstrated aztreonam-avibactam MICs of ≤8 μg/ml and a MIC₉₀ of 1 μg/ml. Against all P. aeruginosa isolates tested, the MIC₉₀ of both aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam was 32 μg/ml; against MBL-positive P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 452), MIC₉₀ values for aztreonam-avibactam and aztreonam were 32 and 64 μg/ml, respectively. The current study demonstrated that aztreonam-avibactam possesses potent in vitro activity against a recent, sizeable global collection of Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, including isolates that were meropenem nonsusceptible, and against MBL-positive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, for which there are few treatment options.