Long-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A multicentre retrospective real-world study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups.

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes) and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management.

Comparison between intravitreal brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment-naive central involved diabetic macular edema: One-year real-life case series

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections in the management of naive central involved diabetic macular edema (CIDME).

METHODS

This study included 45 treatment-naive eyes with CIDME. A complete ophthalmic examination, including BCVA and SD-OCT was performed. Patients were randomized to (IVB) or (IVA) groups. All participants received a loading phase of three consecutive intravitreal injections, then followed by a personalized treat and extend (T&E) regimen.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, the mean numbers of injections in IVA and IVB groups were 7.25  ±  0.53 and 6.3  ±  0.45, respectively (P < 0.0001). The IVA group showed a significant increase of the mean BCVA from 0.66  ±  0.15 logMAR (50.9  ±  7.7 letters) to 0.41  ±  0.19 logMAR (63.7  ±  10.8 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 441.2  ±  35.7 μm to 281.3  ±  18.4 μm. The IVB group showed a significant increase of mean BCVA from 0.65  ±  0.16 logMAR (52.1  ±  7.9 letters) to 0.39  ±  0.17 logMAR (65.3  ±  8.7 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 437.2  ±  41.9 μm to 275.5  ±  21.7 μm.No significant difference between both groups in terms of the vision improvement and the reduction of CFT was reported, whereas a statistical difference was observed in terms of intravitreal injections (IVI) numbers. No ocular complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the effectiveness of both brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of CIDME with a lower frequency of injection in brolucizumab group lowering the burden of IVI in this cohort.

Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema and Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, an electronic search was done to acquire all articles describing brolucizumab use in patients with DME and DR. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022382625). Collected articles were filtered through two stages by independent reviewers. Data were extracted from the included articles and then analyzed accordingly.

RESULTS

Brolucizumab induced significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity and was either better or non-inferior to other types of anti-VEGF (MD -0.64 mu, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.13], P = .01); the same observation was noted with regards to central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) (MD -138.6 mu, 95% CI [-151.9, -125.3], P = .00001). Brolucizumab was reported to be relatively safe for use in diabetic patients, with few adverse events observed, with a higher frequency of adverse events in relation to the 3 mg dose compared to the 6 mg dose.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab is a new drug that has potential advantages in efficacy over other anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME and DR. It showed significant improvement in BCVA and CSMT with the possibility of a lower dosing schedule compared to other agents. Although observed in low frequency, sight-threatening adverse effects appear to occur more frequently compared to other anti-VEGF agents. The main observed adverse event was retinal vasculitis which was seen more commonly with the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose.

Exploring Current Molecular Targets in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration toward the Perspective of Long-Term Agents

Long-lasting anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become an option to reduce treatment frequency, with ongoing research exploring optimal responses and safety profiles. This review delves into molecular targets, pharmacological aspects, and strategies for achieving effective and enduring disease control in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The molecular pathways involved in macular neovascularization, including angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, are explored. VEGF, PlGF, Ang-1, and Ang-2 play crucial roles in regulating angiogenesis, influencing vessel growth, maturation, and stability. The complex interplay of these factors, along with growth factors like TGFβ and bFGF, contributes to the pathogenesis of neovascular membranes. Current anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab, are discussed with a focus on their pharmacokinetics and clinical applications. Strategies to achieve sustained disease control in AMD involve smaller molecules, increased drug dosages, and novel formulations. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular targets and pharmacological aspects of neovascular AMD treatment.

Brolucizumab effectiveness in pigment epithelium detachment due to exudative AMD in naïve treatment or non-responder patients

PURPOSE

To investigate outcomes after Brolucizumab injection in naïve treatment or non-responder patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

It is a retrospective, comparative, cohort study conducted at the tertiary referral center of the University Hospital Polyclinic of Bari, for 5 years, from November 2017 until May 2022. 41 eyes with wet-AMD (w-AMD) were included, undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections. The sample was divided into two groups, the Bro-Switch group, and the Bro-Naïve group. The Bro-Switch group previously received a slot of other anti-VEGF intravitreal drugs. The Bro-Naïve group received Brolucizumab (Bro) as the first treatment. The pigment epithelium detachment (PED) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes before and after Bro-injection were evaluated.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in PED measurement was registered in all eyes treated with Bro-injection (p = 0.35). The Bro-Naïve group improved better in PED measurement (mean difference: 297.92 ± 72,32) as compared to the Bro-Switch group (mean difference: 185.06 ± 11.07). On the contrary, no significant reduction in BCVA in the two groups was recorded (p = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

We suggest Bro-injection for w-AMD as effective anatomical outcomes in PED flattening, but not similar in visual results. Although this study evaluated short-term outcomes, the hopeful results can lead to interesting medium-long time effects.

Bilateral effect following off label unilateral intravitreal brolucizumab injection in patient with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE

To report a bilateral reduction in pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) after unilateral intravitreal injection (IVI) of brolucizumab.

OBSERVATIONS

A 64-year-old female with bilateral recalcitrant PCME was treated with one dose of intravitreal ozurdex implant and triamcinolone acetonide each in both the eyes, with an equivocal response. On switching to IVI brolucizumab in the right eye (OD), the patient showed significant improvement in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with a notable reduction in the intraretinal fluid (IRF) and central subfield thickness (CST) in both the eyes at one month.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE

In conclusion, IVI brolucizumab is effective for the management of recalcitrant PCME with good visual and anatomical outcomes at one month. However, this molecule can also have therapeutic efficacy in the uninjected eye possibly due to systemic escape. More research into the pharmacokinetic properties of this novel molecule is needed to validate our findings.

Adverse events associated with brolucizumab: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

The safety information of brolucizumab primarily comes from clinical trials experience. This study aimed to explore the ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs) associated with brolucizumab among real-world patients through data mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

AE reports submitted to the FAERS database between October 2019 and March 2023 were extracted. The reporting odds ratio was used to evaluate AE signals associated with brolucizumab.

RESULTS

There were 4,380,839 AE reports extracted from the FAERS database, and 3,313 of which were with brolucizumab as primary suspected. A total of 150 ocular AE signals were identified. Ninety-nine were known ocular AEs listed in brolucizumab' label, primarily including vision-related AEs, intraocular infections, and retinal disorders. Fifty-one were unexpected ocular AE signals, including keratic precipitates, retinal perivascular sheathing, dry eye, glaucoma, etc. Meanwhile, several serious systemic AE signals, including arterial thromboembolic events and rhinorrhea, were also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Several unexpected ocular and systemic AE signals associated with brolucizumab were identified through data mining of the FAERS database.

Factors Associated With Intraocular Inflammation in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients Treated With Brolucizumab

Purpose

To identify factors associated with intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with brolucizumab.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we collected aqueous humor samples from 96 eyes of 96 patients receiving treatment with brolucizumab; IOI subsequently developed in 19 eyes of 19 patients. To identify cytokines upregulated in eyes with subsequent development of IOI, we compared the aqueous humor cytokine levels between the IOI and non-IOI groups. We also collected plasma from 20 patients who developed IOI and 20 age- and sex-matched controls to identify differences in plasma biomarkers and the subfraction of CD4+ cells. Using stepwise variable selection and multivariate binary regression analysis, we developed an algorithm that accurately assessed the likelihood of IOI occurrence.

Results

The IOI group showed elevated aqueous humor levels of P-selectin (584 vs. 324 pg/mL, P = 0.013), TNF-α (0.89 vs. 0.60 pg/mL, P = 0.018), and IL-1α (2.0 vs. 1.4 pg/mL, P = 0.035) compared with the non-IOI group. Serum MMP-9 concentrations were higher in the IOI group than the non-IOI group (18,310 vs. 13,450 pg/mL, P = 0.029). Furthermore, the percentage of Th2 cells was significantly decreased in the IOI compared with the non-IOI group (3.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.013). The receiver operating characteristic curves for the optimal models showed an area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.89, indicating good performance.

Conclusions

The combination of elevated concentrations of multiple aqueous humor cytokines and of serum MMP-9 and a lower number of plasma Th2 cells is associated with brolucizumab-related IOI in patients with nAMD.

Real-world experience of brolucizumab in nAMD

PURPOSE

To evaluate real-world outcomes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in relation to anatomical success, visual outcomes, and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) injection at 1.5 years.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, single-center study between December 2020 and December 2022 that included 71 eyes of 62 patients with nAMD, who received IVBr. Patients were divided into three groups, i.e., naïve choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), switched therapy (st) CNVM, and st polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (stPCV). They were subdivided into dry, minimal fluid (fluid <50 microns)/pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and persistent fluid (fluid >100 microns)/PED subgroups depending upon the fluid level at the end of 1.5 years. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), status of fluid, and number of injections at 1.5 years were evaluated. From the beginning, patients were treated on pro re nata (PRN) basis.

RESULTS

Of the 71 eyes, 27 eyes (38%) were naïve CNVM, 35 eyes (49.3%) were stCNVM, and 9 (12.7%) were stPCV cases. Significant vision improvement after 1.5 years was seen in the stCNVM category (P = 0.001), while CMT reduction was significant in all three groups (P < 0.05). The mean number of injections required in naïve CNVM and stCNVM groups was significantly less as compared to the stPCV group (P = 0.017). Further, vision improvement was significant in the "Minimal fluid" subgroup (P = 0.002), while the CMT improvement was significant in the "Minimal fluid" and "Dry" subgroups each with P < 0.0001. No ocular/systemic adverse events including intraocular inflammation (IOI) were noted.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world scenario, with 203 procedures and 1.5-year follow-up, brolucizumab is found to be efficacious and safe with the need for a lesser number of injections and more interval-free period in the management of naïve CNVM, stCNVM, and stPCV patients.

Brolucizumab in age-related macular neovascularization (BRAIN study): Efficacy, optical coherence tomography biomarkers, and safety profile

BACKGROUND

Brolucizumab is a new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive, interventional study was conducted from a tertiary eye hospital, in which treatment-naïve and treatment-switch patients were included. They underwent an intravitreal injection of brolucizumab. The decision to reinject was made based on the presence of fluid on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) or worsening of vision at follow-up. Outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), fluid (subretinal/intraretinal/sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid) levels, and OCT biomarkers and safety analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 59 eyes of 50 patients with a total of 132 intravitreal injections were included. There was a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in BCVA from baseline in logMAR treatment-naïve patients (mean BCVA at baseline 0.6 ± 0.41 and 0.37 ± 0.56). The mean baseline CST of all patients significantly reduced from 582.92 ± 233.11 µm at baseline to 474.06 ± 252.89 µm at the final treatment visit. Thirty-eight percent of patients showed complete resolution of SHRM after a single injection. The interval between each subsequent injection increased from a mean of 67 to 96 days in treatment-switch patients and from 47 to 151 days in treatment-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab promises reduced number of injections with longer treatment intervals.

Structural and clinical changes in previously treated type 1 macular neovascularization in non-responder AMD eyes switched to brolucizumab

PURPOSE

To examine structural and clinical changes in previously treated type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) in non-responder age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab. Subretinal hyper-reflective material (SHRM), intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) presence, fibrovascular-pigment epithelium detachment (PED) height and central macular thickness (CMT) variation were analyzed using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

In this prospective study all patients underwent a complete ophthalmological evaluation including structural OCT at baseline (T0), one month (T1), three (T2), four (T3) and six months after switching to brolucizumab treatment (T4). Non-responder criterion was the persistence of IRF and SRF. Moreover, CMT and BCVA had shown worsening or no improvement before switching to brolucizumab. Clinical function and structural activity biomarkers were measured at each visit and changes were analyzed. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty eyes of twenty patients were enrolled. All the structural variables examined during the follow-up showed significant reductions. Decreases in IRF, SRF and PED were already significant at T1 (p < 0.05). SHRM was significantly reduced at T2 (p < 0.05). Structural biomarkers were absent at T3. At T4, all biomarkers remained stable while SHRM was no longer detectable in 18 patients. Changes in visual acuity from baseline to T4 were not significant.

CONCLUSION

This short-term experience highlights that brolucizumab might be considered an effective treatment option in nAMD with type 1 MNV, as it can promote a reduction of structural activity biomarkers.

Changes in the uninjected contralateral eye after intravitreal brolucizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

Herein we describe the change in the amount of macular oedema in one eye after contralateral intravitreal brolucizumab injections in a patient with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

CASE REPORT

A patient with bilateral nAMD underwent intravitreal bevacizumab injections in both eyes with little improvement in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular exudation. The treatment was switched to aflibercept, but there was incomplete drying of the macula in both eyes. After uneventful cataract extraction, the central macular thickness (CMT) increased markedly in the operated left eye (LE), which was unresponsive to subtenon triamcinolone and further intravitreal aflibercept. Cataract surgery was also performed in the right eye (RE) combined with an intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone implant. Nevertheless, the CMT increased. Intravitreal brolucizumab injections were performed in the RE with almost complete disappearance of the oedema in the treated eye. Concurrently, the contralateral uninjected eye showed a remarkable decrease in CMT. Five months after the first brolucizumab injection, the macular exudation increased again in both eyes. A second brolucizumab injection was performed in the RE only, and was followed by a prompt reduction in CMT in both the injected RE and uninjected LE.

CONCLUSIONS

Although contralateral retinal changes have been described for many other vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, there is little evidence for brolucizumab. We describe a repeated dose- and time-related effect on the uninjected eye in a case of nAMD.

AAV2-antiVEGFscFv gene therapy for retinal neovascularization

Retinal neovascularization (NV) may lead to irreversible vision impairment, the main treatment for which is the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Existing drugs show limited clinical benefits because of their high prices and short half-lives, which increase the financial burden and medical risks to patients. Gene therapy on the basis of adeno-associated viruses is a promising approach to overcome these limitations because of the nonintegrative nature, low immunogenicity, and potential long-term gene expression of adeno-associated viruses. In this study, we constructed a novel recombinant adeno-associated virus with the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) fragment of the anti-VEGF antibody, AAV2-antiVEGFscFv, consisting of the VH and VL structural domains of IgG. AAV2-antiVEGFscFv effectively inhibited NV, retinal leakage, and retinal detachment in oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mice, Tet/opsin/VEGF double-transgenic mice, and VEGF-induced rabbit NV models. AAV2-antiVEGFscFv also significantly suppressed VEGF-induced inflammation. Furthermore, we showed that AAV2-antiVEGFscFv could be sustainably expressed for a prolonged period and exhibited low immunotoxicity in vivo. This study indicates that AAV2-antiVEGFscFv could be a potential approach for NV treatment and provides strong support for preclinical research.

Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Pachychoroid Neovasculopathy Associated With Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy complicated by pachychoroid neovasculopathy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 34 eyes treated with intravitreal brolucizumab. Twenty-five eyes (73.5%) had been treated with other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents before switching to brolucizumab, whereas nine eyes were naïve. Outcome measures included the change of central foveal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness, evaluation of sub/intraretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography, and change in best-corrected visual acuity.

Results

Before starting brolucizumab, 23 eyes showed subretinal fluid, 8 both subretinal and intraretinal fluid, and 3 intraretinal fluid only. At the last visit, 22 eyes (64.7%) showed complete reabsorption of both intraretinal and subretinal fluid, whereas subretinal fluid was still present in 8 eyes (23.5%), and both intraretinal and subretinal fluid in 4 eyes (11.8%). The mean number of brolucizumab injections required to achieve complete fluid reabsorption was 2.8 ± 1.8. central foveal thickness decreased from 317.8 ± 109.3 µm to 239.8 ± 74.8 µm (P = 0.0005) and subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased from 399.3 ± 86.2 µm to 355.5 ± 92.7 µm at the end of the follow-up period (P = 0.0008). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.4 ± 0.2 to 0.3 ± 0.2 at 1 month after the first injection and remained stable at the same values at the end of the follow-up period (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Intravitreal brolucizumab is effective for the treatment of naïve and recalcitrant pachychoroid neovasculopathy.

Translational Relevance

Intravitreal brolucizumab may represent an option in patients with pachychoroid neovasculopathy complicating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

One-Year and 18-Month Outcomes in nAMD Patient Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab Alone versus to Brolucizumab Alternating with Other Anti-VEGF Agents

Objective

Retrospective, real-world study to evaluate visual acuity (VA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection intervals, and central macular thickness (CMT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab only or to brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF.

Methods

The overall study population comprised eyes that were given ≥1 brolucizumab injection between 1 October 2019 and 30 November 2021. The brolucizumab-only (BRO) cohort consisted of prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated exclusively with ≥3 brolucizumab injections over ≥12 or ≥18 months; the alternating brolucizumab (ALT) cohort comprised prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated with ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 other anti-VEGF over ≥12 or ≥18 months.

Results

A total of 482 eyes received ≥1 brolucizumab injection during the study period. Mean VA changes from baseline were -1.1±15.1 letters (BRO cohort; n = 174) and 1.3±13.0 letters (ALT cohort; n = 47) at Month 12, and 0.0±13.5 letters (BRO cohort; n = 95) and -7.3±17.2 letters (ALT cohort; n = 29) at Month 18. Mean changes in injection intervals were +26.9±48.1 days (BRO cohort) and +11.1±17.3 days (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and +36.3±52.3 days (BRO cohort) and +14.0±19.9 days (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Mean changes in CMT were -35.2±108.1 μm (BRO cohort) and -31.5±91.2 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and -38.9±75.0 μm (BRO cohort) and -9.0±59.9 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were recorded in 22/482 (4.6%) eyes.

Conclusion

Treatment with either brolucizumab alone or brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF can preserve vision, reduce CMT, and extend anti-VEGF injection intervals in patients with nAMD.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab for serous drusenoid pigment epithelium detachment non-responder to bevacizumab and aflibercept

INTRODUCTION

We report the case of a woman with drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (DPED) in age-related macular degeneration who was successfully treated with two monthly intravitreal injections of brolucizumab after failing to respond to previous intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and aflibercept.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 56-year-old woman with mixed DPED and overlying subretinal fluid in her right eye was initially treated with three intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and three intravitreal injections of aflibercept with no visual and anatomical improvement. Switching to intravitreal injection of brolucizumab was performed. After two consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of brolucizumab, optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed first subretinal fluid resolution and then DPED collapse in the following months. After nine months, the best corrected visual acuity had improved from 20/40 to 20/20. There were no signs of retinal atrophy and exudative activity on OCT examination. No serious or minor adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to intravitreal brolucizumab injection might be an effective therapeutic option for treatment of mixed DPED with subretinal fluid refractory to other anti-VEGF drugs.

Intravitreal Brolucizumab and Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab and aflibercept in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: In total, 62 treatment-naive PCV eyes (62 patients) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab or aflibercept were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received a monthly loading injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor for 3 months, followed by further injections as required. Visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between drugs after 12 months of treatment. Results: The improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after 12 months of treatment was not significantly different between the brolucizumab-treated (22 eyes) and aflibercept-treated groups (40 eyes). However, in the brolucizumab-treated group, there was a significantly greater decrease in central retinal thickness (172 vs. 147 μm; P = 0.031) and subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment (51 vs. 29 μm; P = 0.025). In addition, the regression rate of polypoidal lesions was significantly higher in the brolucizumab-treated group (77.3%, 17/22 eyes) than that in the aflibercept-treated group (45.0%, 18/40 eyes; P = 0.014). Sterile intraocular inflammation showing mild vitritis was observed in 1 of the 22 eyes (4.5%) of brolucizumab-treated patients. Conclusion: Intravitreal brolucizumab injections for PCV showed visual improvement comparable to that of aflibercept during the 12-month treatment period. However, brolucizumab was more effective than aflibercept for the regression of polypoidal lesions and caused a greater decrease in central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness.

Intraocular Inflammation Secondary to Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Patient with Cognitive Impairment

Background and Objectives: Brolucizumab (IVBr) is a recently introduced anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) which has been found to be very effective in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We reported our findings in a case of nAMD that developed intraocular inflammation (IOI) after IVBr injections. Materials and Methods: A 79-year-old man was referred to our hospital complaining of reduced vision in both eyes of one-month's duration. His decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.9 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. He was diagnosed with nAMD in the left eye and was treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA). Despite the three-monthly IVA injections, the serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and subretinal fluid (SRF) remained, and the VA gradually decreased to 0.1. Because of the patient being refractory to aflibercept treatment, we switched to 3-monthly IVBr injections. The BCVA gradually improved to 0.3 and optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed an absence of the serous PED and SRF. Three weeks after his third IVBr, he returned to our hospital with a complaint of reduced vision in his left eye that he first noted two weeks earlier. Our examination of the left eye showed signs of IOI mainly in the anterior chamber. The inflammation improved with topical steroids but the treatment of the IOI was delayed for two weeks. The patient was instructed that it was important to begin the treatment as soon as the symptoms of IOI developed. We then performed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and his score indicated that he had cognitive impairment. Conclusions: We concluded that before beginning IVBr treatment in nAMD patients, a careful assessment must be made of the cognitive status of the patient.

Effect of Intravitreal Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy With Foveal Lipid Exudation

A 71-year-old woman with a history of blurred vision in her right eye for nearly two months came to our attention. A complete ophthalmological evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity measurement, fundus examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography, was performed. Multimodal imaging showed the presence of a polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) lesion surrounded by diffuse hard exudates in the macular area. Our patient received three monthly intravitreal injections of brolucizumab during the loading phase, followed by an intravitreal injection every eight weeks for a total of 48 weeks of follow-up. The therapy appeared to be effective for improving both visual and anatomical outcomes revealing an important regression of the PCV and an almost complete reabsorption of lipid exudates. Intravitreal brolucizumab could be considered an effective treatment in the management of lipid exudation in PCV patients.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis

Importance

Brolucizumab (Beovu®) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Brolucizumab was marketed for its noninferiority to aflibercept and its potential for greater durability. However, post-marketing utilization has been tempered by safety concerns.

Objective

We evaluate the visual and anatomic efficacy of brolucizumab, examine changes in treatment intervals after switching to brolucizumab, and estimate the incidence of drug-related adverse events in the real world.

Design Setting and Participants

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 626 eyes (543 patients) with nvAMD treated with 1438 brolucizumab injections at a single retina practice between 10/1/2019 and 5/15/2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Changes in visual acuity (VA); anatomic outcomes assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) including central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED) on foveal line scans; treatment intervals before and after receiving brolucizumab; and the incidence of brolucizumab-related adverse events.

Results

The majority of eyes (N = 531, 89.7%) had received prior anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab. VA improved in treatment-naïve eyes (+3.7 letters, p = 0.04), and was maintained in previously treated eyes. There were significant improvements in all anatomic outcomes in both groups (p < 0.001). We observed a 4.8% incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and a 0.6% incidence of retinal vasculitis. The average treatment interval increased from 6.3 to 6.8 weeks (p = 0.001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Brolucizumab treatment was associated with VA improvement in naïve eyes and maintenance of VA in previously treated eyes. Switching to brolucizumab was associated with improved anatomic outcomes and extended treatment intervals in most eyes. We observed a similar incidence of IOI and a lower incidence of retinal vasculitis compared to the Safety Review Committee's analysis of HAWK and HARRIER.

Short-Term Treatment Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicentre Indian Real-World Evidence Study

Objective

To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety outcomes following brolucizumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) as a part of real-world clinical practice in India.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study including patients (≥50 years old) diagnosed with nAMD. Anonymized data of the patients receiving the first dose of brolucizumab intravitreal injection (IVI) who were either treatment-naïve or previously treated with a single or a combination of other anti-VEGF IVIs were included. The present study reported the change in retinal fluid levels from baseline to month 3, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of injections received. The adverse events in the three months after brolucizumab treatment initiation were also monitored.

Results

The study included 63 patients (65 eyes) from four study centres across India (mean age: 69.1 ± 9.7 years). A total of 82 brolucizumab injections were administered during the 3 months of study duration, with 52/65 (80.0%) eyes receiving only 1 injection. Resolution of IRF, SRF, and PED was observed in 76.9%, 64.6%, and 67.7% of eyes, respectively. Further, a significant reduction in CRT was observed (baseline: 403.5 ± 118.7 μm; month 3: 308.3 ± 73.8 μm; p < 0.001), and BCVA also improved notably from 0.7 ± 0.5 logMAR at baseline to 0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR at month 3 (p < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3 eyes from 3 patients; retinal pigment epithelial rip (1) and subretinal hemorrhage (2) after the first injection of brolucizumab, however, none discontinued the treatment.

Conclusion

The study reports on the short-term effectiveness and tolerability of brolucizumab therapy in the management of nAMD in both treatment-naïve and switch eyes. Brolucizumab was observed to have a favourable benefit-risk profile, and study results were within the known safety profile, with no instances of intraocular inflammation.

Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD (nAMD), if these were reported in detail. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, and CENTRAL using the following search terms: <Brolucizumab> AND <AMD> AND <intraocular inflammation>. The risk of bias was rated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. We included 31 reports (41 patients and 46 eyes). Patients were 75.9 ± 8.5 years, and 58.5% were female. IOI occurred 41.7 ± 37.5 (median 37.0) days after treatment initiation with 2.0 ± 1.3 (1-6) IVB injections. A mean change in visual acuity of -14.6 ± 21.0 (median -6.5) letters was reported. The mean time from first IOI signs to the initiation of any anti-inflammatory treatment was 3.3 ± 6.2 days, with 63% of the patients receiving systemic corticosteroids as standard treatment. Finally, a period effect was observed, with a change in visual acuity of -25.3 ± 27.1 and -2.6 ± 7.3 letters in the chronologically first and last third, respectively, of treated eyes (effect size: r = 0.71; p = 0.006). Functional outcomes markedly improved with increasing experience in managing IOI.

RETINAL VASCULITIS OR VASCULAR OCCLUSION AFTER BROLUCIZUMAB FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence

PURPOSE

Retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion (RV/RO) have been reported after brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This systematic literature review evaluated RV/RO events after brolucizumab in real-world practice.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches identified 89 publications; 19 were included.

RESULTS

Publications described 63 patients (70 eyes) with an RV/RO event following brolucizumab. Mean age was 77.6 years and 77.8% of patients were women; 32 eyes (45.7%) received one brolucizumab injection before RV/RO. Mean (range) time to event from last brolucizumab injection was 19.4 (0-63) days, with 87.5% of events occurring within 30 days. Among eyes with preevent and postevent visual acuity (VA) assessments, 22/42 eyes (52.4%) showed unchanged (±0.08 logMAR) or improved vision from last recorded preevent assessment at latest follow-up, whereas 15/42 eyes (35.7%) showed ≥0.30 logMAR (≥15 letters) VA reduction. Patients with no VA loss were on average slightly younger and had a higher proportion of nonocclusive events.

CONCLUSION

Most RV/RO events reported after brolucizumab in early real-world practice occurred in women. Among eyes with VA measurements, approximately half experienced VA loss; overall, about one-third had VA reduction of ≥0.30 logMAR at latest follow-up, with indications of regional variations.

Brolucizumab Intravitreal Injections for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Real-Life Study on a Cohort of Italian Patients

Background and Objectives: To report the real-life Brolucizumab therapeutical outcomes of treatment-naïve and non-treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to analyze the incidence of therapy-related adverse events. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 eyes of 54 patients diagnosed with nAMD were retrospectively evaluated over a 3-month follow-up. Naïve eyes received a 3-month loading phase, whereas non-naïve eyes were treated with one intravitreal injection + ProReNata scheme. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) change. In addition, patients were stratified on the basis of fluid accumulation site, whether intra-retinal (IRF), sub-retinal (SRF), or sub-retinal pigmented epithelium (SRPE), to separately assess the eventual BCVA change in each subgroup. Finally, the incidence of ocular adverse events was evaluated. Results: In naïve eyes, a significant improvement of BCVA (LogMar) was observed at all timepoints from baseline (1 month-Mean Difference (MD): -0.13; 2 months MD: -0.17; 3 months MD: -0.24). In non-naïve eyes, a significant mean change was observed at all timepoints, with the exception of 1-month follow-up (2 months MD: -0.08; 3 months MD: -0.05). CRT significantly changed in both groups at all timepoints at a similar pace within the first two months, with naïve eyes displaying a larger overall thickness decrease at the end of the follow-up (Group 1 = MD: -123.91 µm; Group 2 = MD: -110.33 µm). With respect to the location of the edema, a significant BCVA change was observed in naïve patients with fluid in all three sites at the end of the follow-up (SRPE = MD: -0.13 (p = 0.043); SR = MD: -0.15 (p = 0.019); IR = MD: -0.19 (p = 0.041). Non-naïve patients exhibited significant mean BCVA changes only with respect to SR and IR fluid presence (SRPE = MD: -0.13 (p = 0.152); SR = MD: -0.15 (p = 0.007); IR = MD: -0.06 (p = 0.011). One naïve patient experienced acute-onset anterior and intermediate uveitis which completely resolved after therapy. Conclusions: Brolucizumab was demonstrated to be a safe and efficient alternative in improving both the anatomical and functional parameters of eyes with nAMD in this small, uncontrolled, series of patients.

Differential diagnosis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal drug injection for age related macular degeneration: Sterile vs. infectious

The recent release of brolucizumab and the development of new antiangiogenic molecules as abicipar pegol has increased the interest towards inflammatory complications after intravitreal drug injection. Those drugs are associated to a higher rate of inflammatory adverse events compared to classic drugs. In this context it is essential to differentiate between sterile and infectious cases for a fast and effective treatment. The clinical similarities between infectious and sterile cases, the high rate of culture negative patients and the heterogeneity in the terminology used are obstacles for a correct diagnosis and report of these complications. Sterile cases appear early after the injection, before 48 hours; or 20 days after in brolucizumab-related vasculitis cases. Infectious cases show up around the third day after injection and up to a week after it. A severe visual impairment, severe pain, severe hyperemia, hypopyon and a more severe intraocular inflammatory process are signs of a likely infectious origin. If the cause of the inflammation is uncertain we must follow up the patient closely or "tap and inject" antimicrobial agents in order to prevent the eventual complications of an infectious endophthalmitis. On the other hand, sterile endophthalmitis might be observed in mild cases or treated with steroids according to the severity of the inflammation.

Incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of Intraocular inflammation following Brolucizumab in Indian eyes - A multicentric study

Purpose

To report the incidence, clinical features, potential risk factors, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following brolucizumab in Indian eyes.

Methods

All consecutive patients diagnosed with brolucizumab-induced IOI from 10 centers in eastern India between October 2020 and April 2022 were included.

Results

Of 758 injections given during the study period across centers, 13 IOI events (1.7%) were recorded attributable to brolucizumab. The IOI occurred after the first dose in two eyes (15%) (median 45 days after brolucizumab), second dose in six eyes (46%) (median = 8.5 days), and third dose (39%) in the remaining five eyes (median 7 days). Reinjections of brolucizumab were administered at a median interval of 6 weeks (interquartile range = 4-10 weeks) in the 11 eyes, where IOI occurred after the second or third dose. Eyes that experienced IOI after the third dose had received a significantly greater number of previous antivascular endothelial growth factor injections (median = 8) compared to those who developed it after the first or second dose (median = 4) (P = 0.001). Anterior chamber cells were seen in almost all eyes (n = 11, 85%), while peripheral retinal hemorrhages were seen in two eyes, and one eye showed branch artery occlusion. Two-thirds of patients (n = 8, 62%) recovered with a combination of topical and oral steroids, while remaining recovered with topical steroids alone. Irreversible visual loss was not seen in any eye, and median vision recovered to pre-IOI levels by 3 months' time point.

Conclusion

Brolucizumab-induced IOI was relatively rare, occurring in 1.7% of eyes, was more common after the second or third injection, especially in those who required frequent reinjections every 6 weeks, and occurred earlier with increasing number of previous brolucizumab injections. Continued surveillance is necessary even after repeated doses of brolucizumab.

Duration of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Suppression After Intravitreal Injection of Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in Macaque Eyes

Purpose: To compare the duration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) suppression in the aqueous humor of macaque eyes after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab and aflibercept. Methods: Clinical dose of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr; 6.0 mg/50 μL) or intravitreal aflibercept (IVA; 2 mg/50 μL) was injected into the right eye of each of 8 macaques. Aqueous humor samples (150 μL) from both eyes were obtained just before injection and on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, 84, and 112 after IVBr injection or IVA injection. VEGF concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: In the injected eyes, the mean VEGF suppression durations (range) were 4.9 (3-8) weeks for IVBr injection and 6.8 (6-8) weeks for IVA injection (P = 0.04). The VEGF concentrations returned to the preinjection level in the aqueous humor at 12 weeks both after IVBr and IVA injection. In the noninjected fellow eyes, the aqueous VEGF concentrations had decreased least at 1 day after IVBr injection and at 3 days after IVA injection, but were still detectable. The VEGF concentrations in the fellow eyes returned to the preinjection level in the aqueous humor at 1 week after IVBr injection and at 2 weeks after IVA injection. Conclusions: The duration of VEGF suppression in the aqueous humor after IVBr injection may be shorter than that after IVA injection, which may be related with clinical usage.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review of real-world studies

Intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are first-line treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Phase 3 trials demonstrated non-inferiority of anti-VEGF therapy with brolucizumab compared with aflibercept in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains, with superior anatomical outcomes after brolucizumab. The purpose of the review was to summarize real-world efficacy and safety data on brolucizumab in patients with nAMD. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021290530). We conducted systematic searches in Embase, Medline and key ophthalmology congress websites (19 October 2021). Original reports of efficacy and/or safety in patients receiving brolucizumab to treat nAMD in clinical practice were eligible. The descriptive summary includes reports describing at least 10 brolucizumab-treated eyes. In total, 2907 brolucizumab-treated eyes from 26 studies were included. Outcomes were available for treatment-naive eyes (six studies), eyes switched to brolucizumab from other anti-VEGFs (16 studies), and/or treatment-naive and switch eyes combined (eight studies). Follow-up time points ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year post-brolucizumab initiation. For BCVA, significant improvements compared with brolucizumab initiation were reported in four of six studies in treatment-naive eyes (mean BCVA improvement, range: +3.7 to +11.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and in three of 12 studies in switch eyes (range: +9.0 to +15 ETDRS letters) (all p < 0.05); remaining studies reported no significant post-brolucizumab BCVA changes. For central subfield thickness (CST), improvements post-brolucizumab initiation were reported in all six studies in treatment-naive eyes (mean CST improvement, range: -113.4 to -150.1 μm) and in eight of 11 studies in switch eyes (range: -26 to -185.7 μm) (all p < 0.05). The 14 studies reporting on intraretinal, subretinal and/or total fluid observed improvements post-brolucizumab initiation. The four studies comparing treatment intervals observed extension of the interval between injections after switching to brolucizumab from other anti-VEGFs. Incidence of intraocular inflammation ranged from 0% to 19%. In conclusion, real-world efficacy and safety data concur with brolucizumab pivotal trials. Additionally, reduction of disease activity in anti-VEGF switch eyes was demonstrated by fluid reduction and/or visual acuity gain, along with prolongation of the interval between injections.

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: An Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is a vascular disease of the choroid that leads to hemorrhagic and exudative macular degeneration. It may cause significant vision loss and thus affect the quality-of-life and psychological well-being. Non-invasive, non-ICGA-based OCT criteria have shown reliable results to plan adjunct photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment, with the complete and consistent coverage of polypoidal lesions (PL) and branching neovascular network (BNN). The safety and efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy and its combination with verteporfin PDT have been established. However, treatment is still challenging due to frequent follow-ups, non-availability of PDT, and need for multiple anti-VEGF injection visits that increase the treatment burden and lead to patients being lost to follow-up. Effective treatments that prolong intervals between injections while maintaining vision and anatomical gains remain a critical unmet need. Longer acting molecules, like brolucizumab, have shown non-inferiority in BCVA gains and superior anatomical outcomes compared to other anti-VEGF agents. Newer therapies in the pipeline to enhance the efficacy and longevity of treatment include Faricimab and a port delivery system (PDS). This review summarizes the most recent diagnostic and treatment approaches in PCV to offer better treatment avenues.

[Short-term experience of intravitreal brolucizumab in treatment of diabetic macular edema]

PURPOSE

This study examines the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in real clinical practice in the Russian Federation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 14 consecutive treatment-naïve DME patients, among them 7 males and 7 females (21 eyes in total) with mean age of 65.1±8.0 years. Patients underwent standard ophthalmological examination and multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography. All patients received intravitreal injections of brolucizumab every 6 weeks. A total of 73 injections were performed. A data analysis was performed for 10 eyes of 10 patients 6 months after initiation of the treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 injections of brolucizumab, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increased statistically significantly from 35.8±13.7 to 41.5±11.9 ETDRS letters (p=0.03), central retinal thickness (CRT) and macular volume (MV) decreased from 411.5±107.4 to 280.2±64.6 microns (p=0.014) and from 7.39±0.92 to 6.16±7.37 mm³ (p=0.0006), respectively. The average gain of visual acuity was 5.7±7.0 letters, average decrease of CRT was -131.3±91.2, and average decrease of MV was -1.21±0.75 mm³. There were no adverse events associated with intraocular inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injections of brolucizumab provide significant anatomical and functional improvement to DME patients in real clinical practice with results comparable to that of randomized clinical trials.

HAWK Extension Study: Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: To collect data on efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to support comparability to brolucizumab product used in the Phase III HAWK and HARRIER studies.Methods: The HAWK extension study was a 24-week, double-masked, multicenter study of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who completed the 96-week HAWK core study. All patients were planned to receive three intravitreal injections of either brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. Key endpoint measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness from baseline, and incidence and characteristics of treatment emergent adverse events.Results: Best-corrected visual acuity gain and central subfield thickness reduction observed at the end of the core study were maintained to Week 24 of the extension study. There was no indication of difference in the safety profile of the brolucizumab 6 mg drug product intended for commercialization and the brolucizumab 3 mg or 6 mg drug product used in the Phase III clinical trials.Conclusions: Efficacy and safety with the intended commercial formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients was consistent with that observed in the Phase III studies.

Real-World Experience Using Intravitreal Brolucizumab Alone or in Combination with Aflibercept in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

To evaluate real-world experience using intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr), alone or in combination with aflibercept, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated previously with other inhibitors of VEGF (anti-VEGF).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of all eyes with nAMD treated with IVBr on a treat-and-extend protocol at a single center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and final visit, and drug-related adverse events were analyzed. Eyes with recurrent macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks were treated with a combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every month.

Results

Among 52 eyes (40 patients) on IVBr, all had been previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy, with 73% having persistent macular fluid. After a mean follow-up of 46.2±27.4 weeks on IVBr, the mean treatment interval for intravitreal therapy increased to 8.8±2.1 weeks on IVBr from a baseline of 6.1±3.1 weeks (p<0.001). Macular fluid decreased and BCVA was stable/improved in 61.5% of eyes on IVBr. Ten eyes with increased macular fluid on IVBr monotherapy when extended to every 8 weeks were treated with combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every 4 weeks. In these eyes, 80% had improved macular fluid on OCT and 70% stable or improved BCVA after a median follow-up of 53 weeks on combination therapy. Mild intraocular inflammation developed in four eyes, all occurring on IVBr monotherapy, and none had associated vision loss.

Conclusion

In the real world, IVBr used to treat eyes with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies appears to be well tolerated and associated with an improvement in macular fluid, stabilization of BCVA, and/or increase in intravitreal treatment interval. Combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept monthly appears to be well tolerated and can be considered for eyes with macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks.

[Modern trends in anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration]

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) develops in people aged 50 years and older, its pathogenesis involves progressive destruction of the retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch's membrane. There are eight currently known anti-VEGF drugs for treating the neovascular form of AMD, four of them have already been registered and are used in clinical practice. The first registered drug was pegaptanib, which selectively blocks VEGF₁₆₅. Subsequently, a molecule with a similar mechanism of action was developed and named ranibizumab, which is a humanized monoclonal Fab fragment; it was specifically designed for ophthalmology. Its advantage over pegaptanib was neutralization of all active VEGF-A isoforms. Aflibercept and conbercept are recombinant fusion proteins that act as soluble decoy receptors for VEGF family proteins. Phase III data from the VIEW 1 and 2 studies showed that intraocular injections (IVI) of aflibercept every 1 or 2 months for a year resulted in comparable functional outcomes to monthly IVI of ranibizumab for one year. The next molecule for anti-VEGF therapy that showed effectiveness was brolucizumab - a single-chain fragment of a humanized antibody that binds with high affinity to various VEGF-A isoforms. Simultaneously with studying brolucizumab, another study was conducted involving Abicipar pegol, but that drug showed a high rate of complications. The latest drug registered for the treatment of neovascular AMD is faricimab. The molecule of this drug is a humanized immunoglobulin G antibody that acts on two key points of angiogenesis: VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Thus, the strategy for advancing anti-VEGF therapy lies in the development of molecules with greater efficiency (better effect on newly formed vessels leading to resorption of exudate in the retina, under the neuroepithelium and under the retinal pigment epithelium), which allows not just to preserve vision, but to also significantly improve it when there is no macular atrophy.

Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration - Indian Real-World Experience: The BRAILLE Study - Fifty-Two-Week Outcomes

Purpose

To report the 52-week real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Indian eyes.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective, multicentre chart analysis of 82 eyes of 82 patients with nAMD (switch therapy: 65 eyes; treatment-naïve: 17 eyes) with 52-week follow-up data was performed. Pro-re-nata re-treatment was offered based on visual and tomographic criteria. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), central-subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were the key outcome measures, coupled with the safety profile.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 67.65 (±10.67) years, with 57 male patients (69.5%). The study's mean number of injections was 4.8 (± 0.77). After brolucizumab therapy, the BCVA improved significantly at weeks 4 (P<0.001), and maintained up to week 52 (P<0.001). The CST also reduced significantly at all the visits (Baseline: 413.6 ± 64.6 µm; 52-week: 292.37 ± 13.5 µm; P<0.001). Significantly fewer eyes demonstrated residual SRF (P<0.001) and IRF (P<0.001) at all visits, starting with week 12 and continuing until week 52. The PED resolution was significant from week 24 through week 52 (P=0.004). Each of the 82 eyes received four injections of brolucizumab, with 63.4% (52 eyes) receiving a fifth dose and only 17.1% requiring a sixth. Mild intraocular inflammation (IOI) was seen in three eyes (3.66%) that resolved conservatively. One patient (1.2%) developed mild fever that subsided with oral medications.

Conclusion

The 52-week BRAILLE study demonstrates that brolucizumab is effective and safe in nAMD eyes in a real-world setting. Brolucizumab treatment can reduce the therapeutic burden in patients with nAMD due to its rapid, sustained efficacy and favourable safety profile.

Short-Term Effects of Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration or Polypoidal Choroidopathy Refractory to Previous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy

Background and objectives: To report the initial response to a single intravitreal brolucizumab (IVI-B) injection in wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) or polypoidal choroidopathy (PCV) complicated with either persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) or pigment epithelial detachment refractory to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Material and methods: In this retrospective study, all eyes received a single IVI-B (6 mg/0.05 mL) for wAMD or PCV with treatment-resistant SRF or PED. Outcome measures included assessment in central retinal thickness (CRT), visual acuity, and evaluation for changes in the SRF or PED on OCT. Follow-up was prior to the first brolucizumab injection, then at 1 week and 5 weeks afterwards. Results: In total, 10 eyes of 10 patients (6 women [60%]) were enrolled. Five patients had wAMD and five patients had PCV. Average age of participants was 67.6 years. All patients received one IVI-B. All patients were not treatment-naïve to anti-VEGF agents. At the first week and fifth week following the first IVI-B, seven out of seven patients (100%) had resolved SRF. However, seven out of nine patients (78%) had no improvement of their PED at 5 weeks follow-up. Mean PED height and width before the first IVI-B was 339.77 µm and 2233.44 µm, respectively. Mean PED height and width at the fifthweek following the first IVI-B was 328.125 µm and 2129.5 µm, respectively. Overall mean visual acuity before the first IVI-B was 0.224; and 5 weeks following the first IVI-B was 0.38. Conclusions: Treatment with brolucizumab resulted in anatomical improvement for all patients with persistent SRF. Limited efficacy was seen for persistent PED. Brolucizumab appears to be a safe and effective option for treatment-resistant SRF. Future multicenter collaborative studies are warranted.

Ocular adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy: A pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Background: The purpose of this study is to identify and characterize ocular adverse events (AEs) that are significantly associated with anti-VEGF drugs for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and compare the differences between each drug, and provide clinical reference. Methods: Ocular AEs submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration were analyzed to map the safety profile of anti-VEGF drugs. The Pharmacovigilance tools used for the quantitative detection of signals were reporting odds ratio and bayesian confidence propagation neural network. Results: A total of 10,608,503 AE reports were retrieved from FAERS, with 20,836 for ranibizumab, 19,107 for aflibercept, and 2,442 for brolucizumab between the reporting period of Q1, 2004 and Q3, 2021. We found and analyzed the different AEs with the strongest signal in each drug-ranibizumab-macular ischaemia (ROR = 205.27, IC-2SD = 3.70), retinal pigment epithelial tear (ROR = 836.54, IC-2SD = 7.19); aflibercept-intraocular pressure increased (ROR = 31.09, IC-2SD = 4.61), endophthalmitis (ROR = 178.27, IC-2SD = 6.70); brolucizumab-retinal vasculitis (ROR = 2930.41, IC-2SD = 7.47) and/or retinal artery occlusion (ROR = 391.11, IC-2SD = 6.10), dry eye (ROR = 12.48, IC-2SD = 2.88). Conclusion: The presence of AEs should bring clinical attention. The use of anti-VEGF drugs should be based on the patient's underlying or present medical condition to reduce any adverse event associated with the treatment.

Incidence of adverse events after loading phase of the brolucizumab therapy of neovascular AMD: Real-life evidence in the Czech Republic

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of ocular adverse events after loading phase of the brolucizumab therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in real-life clinical practice - in treatment-naive patients and in patients after switching from another anti-VEGF agent. Another aim was to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with adverse events.

METHODS

This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational study from 16 application centres in the Czech Republic. Patients diagnosed with nAMD were treated with brolucizumab in a fixed regimen of loading phase (3 injections administered at one-month intervals) and the mean follow-up period was 120 ± 10 days after the first injection. The incidence of adverse events and the development of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in patients with complications were evaluated. A total of 1,098 eyes were followed up, of which 783 were treatment-naive and 315 eyes were after switching from another anti-VEGF agent.

RESULTS

Adverse events were recorded in 42 eyes (3.83%), of which 30 eyes were treatment-naive (2.7%) and 12 eyes were post-switch (1.09%). The mean baseline BCVA ± SD was 56.7 ± 10.7 ETDRS chart letters in the group of patients with adverse events, 58.8 ± 10.1 letters in treatment-naive patients, and 51.4 ± 10.2 letters in patients after switch from another anti-VEGF agent. The mean baseline CRT ± SD was 432.2 ± 154.7 μm, being 435.8 ± 137.3 μm in treatment-naive patients and 424.5 ± 186.6 μm in patients after switch from another anti-VEGF agent. At the end of the follow-up, the mean BCVA ± SD was 53.4 ± 9.5 ETDRS charts letters in patients with adverse events, 55.6 ± 10 letters in treatment-naive patients, and 47.6 ± 10 letters in patients after switching from another anti-VEGF agent. The mean CRT ± SD at the end of the follow-up was 300.7 ± 115.7 μm in the total patient cohort, 285.2 ± 78.8 μm in treatment-naive patients and 334.5 ± 165.4 μm in patients after switching from another anti-VEGF agent.

CONCLUSION

We observed the development of adverse events in the form of intraocular inflammation or vasculitis with subsequent decrease in BCVA in 3.83% of cases after loading phase of the brolucizumab therapy. The decrease in BCVA was reversible in most cases after initiation of anti-inflammatory steroid treatment. From a functional and morphological point of view, we did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the groups of treatment-naive patients and patients after switching from another anti-VEGF agent.

Short-Term Morphofunctional Changes in Previously Treated Neovascular AMD Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab

The purpose of the study is to explore the morphofunctional fluctuations in eyes treated for neovascular AMD (nAMD) when treatment is switched from aflibercept or ranibizumab to brolucizumab. A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients with nAMD with type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) were included. All patients were imaged using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The OCT acquisition was performed at the following visits: (i) “T1 visit” corresponding to the last follow-up examination in which an intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab was performed before switching to brolucizumab because of the lack of improvement and (ii) “T2 visit” corresponding to the examination performed 1 month after T1, the latter visit corresponding to the day when a switch to brolucizumab injection was performed, (iii) and 1 month after the latter injection “(T3)”. The main outcome measures were: (1) central macular thickness (CMT), (2) choroidal vascularity index (CVI), (3) subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Functional outcome showed significant differences at each time. Mean ± SD BCVA was 0.43 ± 0.12 LogMAR at T1 and 0.56  ±  0.16 LogMAR at T2 (p = 0.038). A significant improvement in BCVA was displayed at T3 (0.34  ±  0.21 LogMAR) as compared with T2 (p  = 0.019). CMT analysis showed fluctuations three times. In detail, T2 displayed a thicker CMT in comparison with T1, although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Contrariwise, T3 showed a thinner CMT in comparison with T2 (p = 0.002). Analyzing CVI among the three different times, the luminal choroidal area (LCA) and total choroidal area (TCA) showed significantly different values before and after switching to brolucizumab. T2 showed a significant reduction in both vessel lumen and total area compared with T1 (p = 0.032 and p  =  0.046, respectively). Moreover, T3 showed a greater value of both LCA and TCA in comparison with T2 (p = 0.008 and p  =  0.01, respectively). CT did not show significant differences at each time (p > 0.05). Our results reported early experiences on morphofunctional fluctuations in patients with nAMD who switched to brolucizumab. The anatomical impact of brolucizumab administration appears to result in choroidal vascular enlargement, accompanied by the resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF).

A CONSENSUS ON RISK MITIGATION FOR BROLUCIZUMAB IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: Patient Selection, Evaluation, and Treatment

PURPOSE

Brolucizumab has high efficacy in retinal fluid resolution and provides the possibility for longer dosing intervals in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. However, brolucizumab has been associated with events of retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion typically in the presence of other signs of intraocular inflammation (IOI). The purpose of this report is to provide guidance on the use of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration to a global audience.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on adverse events related to IOI after administration of brolucizumab in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

RESULTS

Possible risk factors for IOI and retinal vascular occlusion after brolucizumab should be considered before administering brolucizumab. Patients who receive brolucizumab should be educated on the symptoms, signs, and time course of IOI after brolucizumab. Before each injection of brolucizumab, physicians should assess the eye for any signs of inflammation and not treat with brolucizumab if inflammation is detected. Treatment of IOI should be prompt and provided with particular attention to the posterior segment.

CONCLUSION

Careful patient selection, patient education, assessment for inflammation, and intensive treatment of possible inflammation are important when using brolucizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion represent some of the commonest degenerative conditions that lead to severe vision impairment in the developed countries. The gold standard treatment of complications associated with these conditions is the intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Brolucizumab is a newly developed, humanised, single-chain fragment of a monoclonal antibody binding all VEGF-A isoforms, which was recently approved for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal brolucizumab promises to reduce treatment burden for nAMD patients by achieving comparable therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. Promising also appears its use for the treatment of more challenging maculopathies like diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of brolucizumab and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of degenerative macular disorders.

KESTREL and KITE: 52-Week Results From Two Phase III Pivotal Trials of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab with aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Double-masked, 100-week, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized trials.

METHODS

Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KESTREL (n = 566) or 1:1 to brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KITE (n = 360). Brolucizumab groups received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by 12-week (q12w) dosing, with optional adjustment to every 8 weeks (q8w) if disease activity was identified at predefined assessment visits; aflibercept groups received 5 doses every 4 weeks (q4w) followed by fixed q8w dosing. The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at Week 52; secondary endpoints included the proportion of subjects maintained on q12w dosing, change in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, and anatomical and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

At Week 52, brolucizumab 6 mg was noninferior (NI margin 4 letters) to aflibercept in mean change in BCVA from baseline (KESTREL: +9.2 letters vs +10.5 letters; KITE: +10.6 letters vs +9.4 letters; P < .001), more subjects achieved central subfield thickness (CSFT) <280 µm, and fewer had persisting subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid vs aflibercept, with more than half of brolucizumab 6 mg subjects maintained on q12w dosing after loading. In KITE, brolucizumab 6 mg showed superior improvements in change of CSFT from baseline over Week 40 to Week 52 vs aflibercept (P = .001). The incidence of ocular serious adverse events was 3.7% (brolucizumab 3 mg), 1.1% (brolucizumab 6 mg), and 2.1% (aflibercept) in KESTREL; and 2.2% (brolucizumab 6 mg) and 1.7% (aflibercept) in KITE.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab 6 mg showed robust visual gains and anatomical improvements with an overall favorable benefit/risk profile in patients with DME.

Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with early residual fluid in the HAWK and HARRIER studies.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis using pooled data from the phase 3 studies HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328).

PARTICIPANTS

The early residual fluid cohort for this post hoc analysis consisted of patients treated with either brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 730 patients) or aflibercept 2 mg (n = 729 patients) and who had the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or both verified by spectral-domain OCT at the week 12 clinic visit.

METHODS

After 3 initial monthly doses, patients treated with brolucizumab received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or every 8 weeks (q8w), depending on the neovascular age-related macular degeneration disease activity, whereas patients treated with aflibercept received fixed q8w dosing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) from the baseline to that at weeks 48 and 96, the proportion of patients treated with brolucizumab remaining on q12w dosing to week 96, and the change in fluid status at weeks 48 and 96.

RESULTS

All analyses were based on 149 of 730 (20.4%) patients treated with brolucizumab and 217 of 729 (29.8%) patients treated with aflibercept with spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at their week 12 visit. The best-corrected visual acuity improvements from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were numerically better for brolucizumab than for aflibercept (least square mean [standard error] 7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 0.9 and 7.4 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.1 letters, respectively). The CST reductions from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were consistently greater with brolucizumab than with aflibercept (least square mean [standard error], μm: -194.9 ± 13.7 vs. -123.9 ± 11.3; and -201.1 ± 14.5 vs. -134.2 ± 12.0, respectively). At weeks 48 and 96, patients treated with brolucizumab had a 40.4% and 31.3% probability of remaining on q12w dosing intervals, respectively. Fewer patients treated with brolucizumab had remaining IRF, SRF, or both at weeks 48 and 96 than patients treated with aflibercept (59.1% vs. 75.1% and 49.0% vs. 60.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early residual fluid, defined as spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at the week 12 clinic visit, brolucizumab resolved the early residual fluid and reduced CST more effectively than aflibercept, resulting in greater best-corrected visual acuity improvements through week 96 of anti-VEGF treatment.

Evaluation of cardiac parameters and other safety outcomes of brolucizumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

This was a prospective, single‐dose, single‐arm, open‐label, non‐randomized, multicenter clinical study to determine cardiovascular safety after a single brolucizumab 6 mg intravitreal injection in neovascular age‐related macular degeneration patients (N = 14). Electrocardiogram (ECG) data were collected at different time points using 12‐lead Holter and standard ECG, and patients were followed up to 8 days (end of study) for any signs of ocular and non‐ocular adverse events (AEs). No clinically meaningful changes were observed in cardiac parameters. No patient had a ≥30 msec change from baseline in heart rate–corrected QT using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and no patient had a new QTcF value of ≥450 msec between 20 and 24 h after treatment. No deaths or serious AEs were reported during the study period. These results are in line with the absence of new cardiovascular safety signal based on the ECG recordings collected over the first year of the pivotal studies performed with brolucizumab in DME.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03954626.

Initial experience in treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with brolucizumab in Indian eyes - A multicenter retrospective study

Purpose:

To report the initial experience of managing treatment-resistant and treatment-naïve eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) by using brolucizumab 6 mg.

Methods:

This was a retrospective multicentric series of all consecutive eyes with PCV treated with brolucizumab. Treatment resistance was defined as taking at least six prior anti-VEGF injections over the past 1 year and showing persistent disease activity in the form of intra (IRF) or subretinal fluid (SRF) or both. All patients were treated on a pro re nata (PRN) basis and followed up monthly. Retreatment was considered when either SRF or IRF were present at any time point during the study.

Results:

We included 21 eyes of 21 patients with PCV with a mean age of 65.1 ± 9.9 years, of which 16 eyes (76%) were treatment-resistant. The mean follow-up period from receiving the first brolucizumab was 27.3 ± 3.3 weeks. Of the 21 eyes, seven eyes (33%) received three injections during follow-up, 13 eyes (62%) received two injections, and one eye received one injection. The mean injection-free interval was 12 ± 1.2 weeks. The median pretreatment vision was 0.6 logMAR (IQR = 0.47–1 logMAR) and improved to 0.3 logMAR (IQR = 0.25–0.6 logMAR), whereas the mean macular thickness improved from 443 ± 60 mm at baseline to 289 ± 25 mm (P < 0.001) at the last follow-up period. None of the eyes experienced any intraocular inflammation across 48 injection sessions

Conclusion:

Brolucizumab is safe and effective in controlling PCV disease in both treatment-resistant and treatment-naïve eyes.

CHANGES IN SYSTEMIC LEVELS OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF AFLIBERCEPT OR BROLUCIZUMAB FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare the effects of intravitreal brolucizumab versus aflibercept on systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional case series study, brolucizumab (6.0 mg/50 µL) or aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 µL) was injected intravitreally in 30 patients each. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 7 days and 28 days after the first injection. Systemic VEGF-A levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Thirty healthy individuals served as controls.

RESULTS

The median baseline systemic VEGF-A levels in the brolucizumab, aflibercept, and control groups were 10.8 (8.0-13.2), 12.0 (8.0-18.5), and 10.0 (8.0-15.1) pg/mL, respectively (P = 0.315). In the brolucizumab group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-11.5) pg/mL on Day 7 (P = 0.0254) and to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 28 (P < 0.001). In the aflibercept group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 7 (P < 0.001) but returned to the baseline level, 12.5 (8.5-14.6) pg/mL, on Day 28 (P = 0.120). Vascular endothelial growth factor-A levels were significantly different between the treatment groups after 28 days (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal brolucizumab resulted in a sustained reduction of systemic VEGF-A levels until 28 days posttreatment, which raises concerns regarding its safety and long-term effects.

Hypo-angiogenesis: a possible pathological factor in the development of dry age-related macular degeneration and a novel therapeutic target

Background

Angiogenesis causes severe vision loss in patients with exudative or wet forms of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The pathogenesis involves upregulation of several proangiogenic factors, particularly the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Contrary to the pathogenesis of exudative AMD, molecular events leading to the development of dry AMD remain unclear. Dry AMD is characterized by loss of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The mechanism that triggers RPE cell loss remains unclear. Choriocapillaris development is absent in mice with RPE-specific deletion of VEGF. Moreover, in later life, background VEGF secretion promotes the survival of the RPE and maintains choriocapillaris integrity.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that reduced synthesis of VEGF (hypo-angiogenesis) or abnormalities in its receptors, VEGF receptor-1 (VEGFR1) and VEGFR2, may be involved in the pathogenesis of non-exudative AMD or dry AMD. If the concept of hypo-angiogenesis as a driver for dry AMD is proven, treatment with VEGF or induction of angiogenesis could be considered. Similar attempts at therapeutic angiogenesis have been actively investigated in cardiac and limb ischemia.

Conclusions

The reasons for a patient developing exudative AMD or dry AMD remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, targeting increased VEGF production in patients with exudative AMD using anti-VEGF drugs is highly efficacious in preserving vision. Similarly, dry AMD may be a manifestation of reduced VEGF synthesis (hypo-angiogenesis) and subsequent decreased RPE cell survival. Experimental studies exploring the possibility of reduced VEGF secretion and/or increased receptor resistance/abnormality could pave the way for clinical trials of angiogenesis to treat dry AMD.

Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

The use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has profoundly changed the prognosis of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). As clinical experiences have accumulated, it has become mandatory to summarize data to give information that can be useful in everyday practice. We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported 12-month changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with nAMD on anti-VEGF monotherapy. Data were analyzed in a random-effects meta-analysis with BCVA change as the primary outcome. Meta-regression was conducted to evaluate the impact of multiple covariates. Four hundred and twelve heterogeneous study populations (109,666 eyes) were included. Anti-VEGFs induced an overall improvement of +5.37 ETDRS letters at 12 months. Meta-regression showed that mean BCVA change was statistically greater for RCTs (p = 0.0032) in comparison with observational studies. Populations following a proactive regimen had better outcomes than those following a reactive treatment regimen. Mean BCVA change was greater in younger populations, with lower baseline BCVA and treated with a higher number of injections (p < 0.001). Our results confirm that anti-VEGFs may produce a significant functional improvement at 12 months in patients with nAMD.