Amino acid intrinsic alpha-helical propensities III: positional dependence at several positions of
C terminus.
Protein Sci 2002;
11:766-77. [PMID:
11910021 PMCID:
PMC2373540 DOI:
10.1110/ps.2610102]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we have analyzed experimentally the helical intrinsic propensities of non-charged and non-aromatic residues at different C-terminal positions (C1, C2, C3) of an Ala-based peptide. The effect was found to be complex, resulting in extra stabilization or destabilization, depending on guest amino acid and position under consideration. Polar (Ser, Thr, Cys, Asn, and Gln) amino acids and Gly were found to have significantly larger helical propensities at several C-terminal positions compared with the alpha-helix center (-1.0 kcal/mole in some cases). Some of the nonpolar residues, especially beta-branched ones (Val and Ile) are significantly more favorable at position C3 (-0.3 to -0.4 kcal/mole), although having minor differences at other C-terminal positions compared with the alpha-helix center. Leu has moderate (-0.1 to -0.2 kcal/mole) stabilization effects at position C2 and C3, whereas being relatively neutral at C1. Finally, Met was found to be unfavorable at C1 and C2 ( +0.2 kcal/mole) and favorable at C3 (-0.2 kcal/mole). Thus, significant differences found between the intrinsic helical propensities at the C-terminal positions and those in the alpha-helix center must be accounted for in helix/coil transition theories and in protein design.
Collapse