1
|
Wolf EV, Halfmann MC, Schoepf UJ, Zsarnoczay E, Fink N, Griffith JP, Aquino GJ, Willemink MJ, O’Doherty J, Hell MM, Suranyi P, Kabakus IM, Baruah D, Varga-Szemes A, Emrich T. Intra-individual comparison of coronary calcium scoring between photon counting detector- and energy integrating detector-CT: Effects on risk reclassification. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 9:1053398. [PMID: 36741832 PMCID: PMC9892711 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1053398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare coronary artery calcium volume and score (CACS) between photon-counting detector (PCD) and conventional energy integrating detector (EID) computed tomography (CT) in a phantom and prospective patient study. Methods A commercially available CACS phantom was scanned with a standard CACS protocol (120 kVp, slice thickness/increment 3/1.5 mm, and a quantitative Qr36 kernel), with filtered back projection on the EID-CT, and with monoenergetic reconstruction at 70 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction off on the PCD-CT. The same settings were used to prospectively acquire data in patients (n = 23, 65 ± 12.1 years), who underwent PCD- and EID-CT scans with a median of 5.5 (3.0-12.5) days between the two scans in the period from August 2021 to March 2022. CACS was quantified using a commercially available software solution. A regression formula was obtained from the aforementioned comparison and applied to simulate risk reclassification in a pre-existing cohort of 514 patients who underwent a cardiac EID-CT between January and December 2021. Results Based on the phantom experiment, CACS PCD-CT showed a more accurate measurement of the reference CAC volumes (overestimation of physical volumes: PCD-CT 66.1 ± 1.6% vs. EID-CT: 77.2 ± 0.5%). CACS EID-CT and CACS PCD-CT were strongly correlated, however, the latter measured significantly lower values in the phantom (CACS PCD-CT : 60.5 (30.2-170.3) vs CACS EID-CT 74.7 (34.6-180.8), p = 0.0015, r = 0.99, mean bias -9.7, Limits of Agreement (LoA) -36.6/17.3) and in patients (non-significant) (CACS PCD-CT : 174.3 (11.1-872.7) vs CACS EID-CT 218.2 (18.5-876.4), p = 0.10, r = 0.94, mean bias -41.1, LoA -315.3/232.5). The systematic lower measurements of Agatston score on PCD-CT system led to reclassification of 5.25% of our simulated patient cohort to a lower classification class. Conclusion CACS PCD-CT is feasible and correlates strongly with CACS EID-CT , however, leads to lower CACS values. PCD-CT may provide results that are more accurate for CACS than EID-CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias V. Wolf
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany,Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Moritz C. Halfmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - U. Joseph Schoepf
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Emese Zsarnoczay
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States,MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Medical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nicola Fink
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States,Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph P. Griffith
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Gilberto J. Aquino
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Martin J. Willemink
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States,Segmed, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Jim O’Doherty
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States,Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA, United States
| | - Michaela M. Hell
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Pal Suranyi
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Ismael M. Kabakus
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dhiraj Baruah
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Akos Varga-Szemes
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Tilman Emrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany,Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany,*Correspondence: Tilman Emrich,
| |
Collapse
|