The spatial distribution of focal stacks within the inner enamel layer of mandibular mouse incisors

Focal stacks are an alternative spatial arrangement of enamel rods within the inner enamel of mandibular mouse incisors where short rows comprised of 2–45 enamel rods are nestled at the side of much longer rows, both sharing the same rod tilt directed mesially or laterally. The significance of focal stacks to enamel function is unknown, but their high frequency in transverse sections (30% of all rows) suggests that they serve some purpose beyond representing an oddity of enamel development. In this study, we characterized the spatial distribution of focal stacks in random transverse sections relative to different regions of the inner enamel and to different locations across enamel thickness. The curving dentinoenamel junction (DEJ) in transverse sections complicated spatial distribution analyses, and a technique was developed to “unbend” the curving DEJ allowing for more linear quantitative analyses to be carried out. The data indicated that on average there were 36 ± 7 focal stacks located variably within the inner enamel in any given transverse section. Consistent with area distributions, focal stacks were four times more frequent in the lateral region (53%) and twice as frequent in the mesial region (33%) compared to the central region (14%). Focal stacks were equally split by tilt (52% mesial vs. 48% lateral, not significant), but those having a mesial tilt were more frequently encountered in the lateral and central regions (2:1) and those having a lateral tilt were more numerous in the mesial region (1:3). Focal stacks having a mesial tilt were longer on average compared to those having a lateral tilt (7.5 ± 5.6 vs. 5.9 ± 4.0 rods per row, p < 0.01). There was no relationship between the length of a focal stack and its location within the inner enamel. All results were consistent with the notion that focal stacks travel from the DEJ to the outer enamel the same as the longer and decussating companion rows to which they are paired. The spatial distribution of focal stacks within the inner enamel was not spatially random but best fit a null model based on a heterogenous Poisson point process dependent on regional location within the transverse plane of the enamel layer.

Quantitative analysis of the core 2D arrangement and distribution of enamel rods in cross-sections of mandibular mouse incisors

Considerable descriptive information about the overall organization of mouse mandibular incisor enamel is available but almost nothing is known about the quantitative characteristics of enamel rod arrangement and distribution in these teeth. This has important implications concerning cell movement during the secretory stage because each ameloblast makes one enamel rod. Knowing how many enamel rods are cut open in a cross-section of the enamel layer could provide insights into understanding the dynamics of how groups of ameloblasts form the enamel layer. In this study, cross-sections of fully mineralized enamel were cut on 24 mandibular mouse incisors, polished and etched, and imaged by scanning electron microscopy in backscatter mode. Montaged maps of the entire enamel layer were made at high magnification and the enamel rod profiles in each map were color-coded based upon rod category. Quantitative analyses of each color layer in the maps were then performed using standard routines available in imagej. The data indicated that that there were on average 7233 ± 575 enamel rod profiles per cross-section in mandibular incisors of 7-week-old mice, with 70% located in the inner enamel layer, 27% located in the outer enamel layer, and 3% positioned near the mesial and lateral cementoenamel junctions. All enamel rod profiles showed progressive increases in tilt angles, some very large in magnitude, from the lateral to mesial sides of the enamel layer, whereas only minor variations in tilt angle were found relative to enamel thickness at given locations across the enamel layer. The decussation angle between alternating rows of rod profiles within the inner enamel layer was fairly constant from the lateral to central labial sides of the enamel layer, but it increased dramatically in the mesial region of the enamel layer. The packing density of all rod profiles decreased from lateral to central labial regions of the enamel layer and then in progressing mesially, decreased slightly (inner enamel, mesial tilt), increased slightly (outer enamel layer) or almost doubled in magnitude (inner enamel, lateral tilt). It was concluded that these variations in rod tilt angle and packing densities are adaptations that allow the tooth to maintain a sharp incisal edge and shovel-shape as renewing segments formed by around 7200 ameloblasts are brought onto the occluding surface of the tooth by continuous renewal.

Kallikrein-related peptidase-4 (KLK4): role in enamel formation and revelations from ablated mice

Enamel development occurs in stages. During the secretory stage, a soft protein rich enamel layer is produced that expands to reach its final thickness. During the maturation stage, proteins are removed and the enamel matures into the hardest substance in the body. KLK4 is expressed during the transition from secretory to the maturation stage and its expression continues throughout maturation. KLK4 is a glycosylated chymotrypsin-like serine protease that cleaves enamel matrix proteins prior to their export out of the hardening enamel layer. Mutations in KLK4 can cause autosomal recessive, non-syndromic enamel malformations in humans and mice. Klk4 ablated mice initially have normal-looking teeth with enamel of full thickness. However, the enamel is soft and protein-rich. Three findings are notable from Klk4 ablated mice: first, enamel rods fall from the interrod enamel leaving behind empty holes where the enamel fractures near the underlying dentin surface. Second, the ~10,000 crystallites that normally fuse to form a solid enamel rod fail to grow together in the ablated mice and can fall out of the rods. Third, and most striking, the crystallites grow substantially in width and thickness (a- and b-axis) in the ablated mice until they almost interlock. The crystallites grow in defined enamel rods, but interlocking is prevented presumably because too much protein remains. Conventional thought holds that enamel proteins bind specifically to the sides of enamel crystals to inhibit growth in width and thickness so that the thin, ribbon-like enamel crystallites grow predominantly in length. Results from Klk4 ablated mice demonstrate that this convention requires updating. An alternative mechanism is proposed whereby enamel proteins serve to form a mold or support structure that shapes and orients the mineral ribbons as they grow in length. The remnants of this support structure must be removed by KLK4 so that the crystallites can interlock to form fully hardened enamel.