Solar Urticaria: An Ambispective Study in a Long-term Follow-up Cohort with Emphasis on Therapeutic Predictors and Outcomes

Solar urticaria is a rare photodermatosis with several unknown pathogenic, clinical and therapeutic aspects. This study analysed the clinical and therapeutic features of a long-term follow-up solar urticaria cohort, with a focus on omalizumab management and outcomes, and characterized omalizumab response with the use of the high-affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor (FcεRI) and the Urticaria Control Test. An observational, unicentric, ambispective study was conducted from 2007 to 2023. Solar urticaria was diagnosed in 41 patients with a median follow-up of 60 months. Thirteen patients were prescribed omalizumab, with a median treatment time of 48 months. A significant decrease in FcεRI baseline levels and subsequent median increase in Urticaria Control Test was evidenced after omalizumab prescription in all patients. Drug survival at 48 months was at 88.9%. Omalizumab stepping-down protocol led to sustained omalizumab discontinuation in only 1 patient. Median basal Urticaria Control Test was lower (p < 0.01) in patients who were prescribed omalizumab and in patients without remission. This study contributes to our knowledge of omalizumab outcomes in real-life clinical practice and highlights the pathogenic importance of IgE-mediated pathways in solar urticaria, where FcεRI emerges as a possible biomarker of omalizumab response.

A Proposal for the Etiopathogenesis of Acquired Cold Urticaria: Role of Substance P, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Mast Cell Chymase

Background

The etiopathogenesis and cold stimulation mechanism are not fully understood in cold urticaria (CU). Substance P (SP) is released from skin neurons as a result of cold stimulation. It causes mast cell degranulation and therefore causes mast cell chymase (MCC) release. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) plays a role in removing SP from the environment. ACE also catalyses the conversion of angiotensin I (AT1) to angiotensin II (AT2), like MCC. This study aims to investigate the role of SP, ACE and MCC in the pathogenesis of CU.

Methods

Patients with acquired CU were included in the study. Two punch biopsies were taken from the urticaria plaque resulting from the stimulation and the intact skin without lesions. The samples were evaluated histopathologically. All samples were stained immunohistochemically with SP, ACE and MCC antibodies.

Results

The number of patients included in the study was 21. In the plaque lesion, the presence of dermal neutrophil and eosinophil, neutrophil in the vascular lumen were found to be statistically significantly higher than intact tissue (p = 0.046, P = 0.014, P = 0.014). Strong positive staining was detected in the full thickness of the epidermis, vascular endothelial cells, eccrine and sebaceous glands with ACE. MCC was statistically significantly higher in lesional skin than lesion-free skin samples (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Mast cell maintains its central role in CU pathogenesis. SP, which causes neurogenic inflammation, may not be detected due to its rapid destruction in the tissue. Strong staining of ACE, which takes part in the local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAS) system in the skin, should be documented quantitatively.

Cold contact urticaria triggered by a permanent tattoo

Cold contact urticaria is an inducible urticaria triggered by exposure to cold air, liquids, or objects. Symptoms may range from mild, localized urticaria to genuine anaphylaxis particularly after extensive contact of large skin areas to cold. Treatment mainly requires a strict avoidance of cold exposure and the use of second-generation H1 antihistamine. In most cases, it is not associated with any specific etiology although in rare cases it can be secondary to various associated diseases or triggered by a number of external factors. We present the observation of a 38-year-old woman for whom cold contact urticaria began on a recent tattoo area.

Management problems in severe chronic inducible urticaria: Two case reports

Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a subgroup of chronic urticaria which can cause severe quality of life impairment by their refractory forms. The recommended treatment approach in CindU is the same as that for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, CIndU seem to be more resistant to standard doses of H1 antihistamines (AHs) and higher doses of AHs are required for symptom control. Omalizumab, a recombinant anti-IgE antibody, effectively treats CSU. Nevertheless, there is not enough evidence in patients with CIndU, especially in AHs resistant cases. This study analyzed 2 severe cases of CIndU (cold urticaria and symptomatic dermographism) with completely different response to omalizumab. We describe 2 patients with 2 subtypes of CIndU: one with severe cold urticaria (including anaphylaxis) and the other with severe extensive symptomatic dermographysm. In both cases, we performed complete positive and differential diagnostic work-up. Management strategies included first line and second line symptomatic therapy, but with no success in either case. Avoidance of eliciting triggers was difficult to achieve (occupational reasons). We decided to start omalizumab treatment, 300 mg every 4 weeks for 6 months. The cold urticaria patient gained complete symptom relief 10 days after the first dose of omalizumab; the quality of life improved substantially with no side effects of the treatment. The urticaria factitia patient showed no benefit of the add-on 5 months treatment with omalizumab. He refused the 6th dose of omalizumab due to the lack of response, and also cyclosporine, but he showed some benefits of oral corticosteroids. Although many clinical studies support the use of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with CIndU, we certainly need more data for prediction of a good clinical response.

Clinical characteristics and epidemiology of chronic urticaria: a nationwide, multicentre study on 1091 patients

Introduction

Urticaria is one of the most common skin diseases. Depending on the length of symptoms, acute (lasting less than 6 weeks) and chronic urticaria (CU) (> 6 weeks) are distinguished. According to the current European guidelines, CU is divided into inducible urticaria (IU) and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

Aim

To assess the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of CU in Poland.

Material and methods

This was a nationwide, multicentre, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study performed under the auspices of the Polish Dermatological Society. A total of 102 physicians (dermatologists and allergists) recruited 1091 patients suffering from CU.

Results

Among 1091 adults with CU, IU was found in 35.1% (n = 383) of patients and CSU was responsible for 61.1% (n = 667) of CU cases. The remaining patients (n = 41, 3.8%) suffered from both, IU and CSU. Persons with CSU were twice more likely to report family history of urticaria than those with IU (12.1% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.001). Generalized eruptions of wheals predominated in CSU (generalized wheals: 57.9%, localized wheals: 42.1%), whereas wheals localized in particular body areas were found more commonly in IU (generalized wheals: 45.2%, localized wheals: 54.8%, p < 0.001). The CU was the cause of absenteeism in almost every fifth patient suffering from this disease.

Conclusions

The CSU is about twice as frequent cause of CU as compared to IU. The treatment of CU is a major challenge for physicians of various specialties and the treatment choice is closely associated with the specialist knowledge of current treatment guidelines.

Chronic inducible urticaria: A systematic review of treatment options

BACKGROUND

Chronic inducible urticaria (CindU) is a condition characterized by the appearance of recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both as a response to specific and reproducible triggers.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically assess evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment options for CindU. Results were used to inform the 2017 update of "The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria."

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and controlled intervention studies were searched systematically in various databases. Included studies were evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Where possible, results from single studies were meta-analyzed, applying the Mantel-Haenszel approach by using a random-effects model (Der Simonian-Laird).

RESULTS

We identified 30 studies that included patients with cold urticaria, symptomatic dermographism, delayed-pressure urticaria, or cholinergic urticaria. No studies on other forms of CindU were eligible. Risk of bias was often rated as unclear or high. Overall, second-generation antihistamines were more effective than placebo, and available data indicate that updosing might be effective. Omalizumab proved effective in patients with symptomatic dermographism, who did not respond to antihistamines. Detailed results are given for each type of CindU.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is limited by small samples, heterogeneous efficacy outcomes, and poor reporting quality in many of the included studies. The findings are congruent with the suggested stepwise approach to treating CindUs. However, the data do not allow for drawing specific conclusions for specific subtypes of CindU.

Aquagenic urticaria: diagnostic and management challenges

Aquagenic urticaria (AU) is a rare inducible form of physical urticaria, which occurs in response to cutaneous exposure to water, including sweat and tears. Patients present with characteristic 1–3 mm folliculocentric wheals with surrounding 1–3 cm erythematous flares within 20–30 minutes following skin contact with water. In rare cases, there are concomitant systemic symptoms, such as wheezing or shortness of breath. The pathogenesis of AU is poorly understood at this time, and it appears to be mediated in both a histamine-dependent and independent manner. Diagnosis is based on eliciting a thorough clinical history combined with a water challenge test. Some patients may need to undergo further testing to exclude other physical urticarias. Rarely, multiple physical urticarias can be present in one patient, which can complicate diagnosis and treatment. Currently, the first-line therapy for AU is an oral administration of nonsedating, second-generation H₁ antihistamines, but many patients may require further interventions to have adequate symptomatic control. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic and management challenges of AU. We review the key diagnostic features that differentiate AU from other physical urticarias. We additionally describe a therapeutic ladder for the treatment of AU and the rationale supporting these treatments.