Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Treatment after Nusinersen in an Infant with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) was limited to symptomatic treatment with no cure. Three innovative drugs, nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA), and risdiplam have been developed to treat SMA. Although the clinical trials for these drugs have demonstrated their efficacy, there is limited information on real world treatment strategies. In this study, we present a case of a male infant with SMA type 1 who underwent OA treatment after nusinersen treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

At 4 months of age, the patient was diagnosed with SMA type 1. At 6 months of age, nusinersen treatment was initiated. His motor function improved, but the effect was limited; therefore, his parents requested gene replacement therapy. During the preparation for OA treatment, anti-adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) antibody tests repeatedly showed non-specific reactions, which delayed initiation of treatment. The patient was put on ventilator management after he caught a common cold. During this management, the anti-AAV9 antibody test results were negative. Furthermore, the patient showed increased transaminase levels just before OA treatment; however, since these gradually decreased without signs of liver failure, we started OA treatment at 13 months of age. Four months later, the patient began to sit without support and was weaned from non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, although nasogastric tube feeding remained partially necessary.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the management of unstable SMA type 1 symptoms, anti-AAV9 antibody testing, and changes in transaminase levels will be helpful for other patients with SMA who require treatment.

Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Administration via Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Case Report

Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is the approved intravenous gene therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). A functional copy of the human SMN1 gene was inserted into the target motor neuron cells via a viral vector, AAV9. In clinical trials, OA was infused through a peripheral venous catheter, and no data are available on central catheter use. Recently, we had a case where OA was administered directly into the right atrium via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) instead of a peripheral line, as recommended. The patient was a female child aged 4 months, diagnosed as SMA type I. For practical reasons, a dose of OA according to the weight of the patient (1.1 × 1014 vectorial genomes/kg) was administered via PICC in 1 h, as the product information recommends. The drug was well tolerated, with no hypersensitivity reactions or initial elevation of transaminases or other adverse effects. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported where OA was administered via a central line. This type of administration is not contraindicated, but it is not specifically contemplated or recommended. It is unknown whether central line administration could have any implications for transduction efficiency and immunogenicity. Future studies should clarify these aspects, as each gene therapy has a specific optimal dose recorded that depends on the site and route of administration of the drug, the AAV variant and the transgene.

Cost-Effectiveness of Technologies for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review of Economic Studies

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to systematically collect data on cost-effectiveness analyses that assess technologies to treat type I and II spinal muscular atrophy and evaluate their recommendations.

METHODS

A structured electronic search was conducted in 4 databases. Additionally, a complementary manual search was conducted. Complete economic studies that evaluated nusinersen, risdiplam, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA), and the best support therapy (BST) from the health system's perspective were selected. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared with various thresholds for the analysis. The review was registered a priori in PROSPERO (CRD42022365391).

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the analyses. They were all published between 2017 and 2022 and represent the recommendations in 8 countries. Most studies adopted 5, 6, or 10-state Markov models. Some authors took part in multiple studies. Four technologies were evaluated: BST (N = 14), nusinersen (N = 19), risdiplam (N = 5), and OA (N = 9). OA, risdiplam, and nusinersen were considered inefficient compared with the BST. Risdiplam and OA were generally regarded as cost-effective when compared with nusinersen. Because nusinersen is not a cost-effective drug, no recommendation can be derived from this result. Risdiplam and OA were compared in 2 studies that presented opposite results.

CONCLUSIONS

Nusinersen, risdiplam, and OA are being adopted worldwide as a treatment for spinal muscular atrophy. Despite that, the pharmacoeconomic analyses show that the technologies are not cost-effective compared with the BST. The lack of controlled studies for risdiplam and OA hamper any conclusions about their face-to-face comparison.

Considerations for Treatment in Clinical Care of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patients

Spinal Muscular Atrophy is a neurodegenerative disease which can lead to muscle weakness, paralysis, and in some cases death. There are many factors that contribute to the severity of symptoms and those factors can be used to determine the best course of treatment for the patients. We looked through published literature to create a set of considerations for treatment in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy including age, type, SMN2 copies, and any familial considerations. This can serve as a guide for what to consider in the treatment of SMA patients clinically.

Cost-Effectiveness of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Compared With Nusinersen and Risdiplam in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 in Brazil: Custo-Efetividade do Onasemnogeno Abeparvoveque (AVXS-101) em Comparação ao Nusinersena e Risdiplam em Pacientes com Atrofia Muscular Espinhal Tipo 1 no Brasil

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the onasemnogene abeparvovec in relation to nusinersen and risdiplam in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy type 1 from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System.

METHODS

A Markov model was built on a lifetime horizon. Short-term data were obtained from clinical trials of the technologies and from published cohort survival curves (long term). Costs were measured in current 2022 local currency (R$) values and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Utility values were derived from type 1 spinal muscular atrophy literature, whereas costs related to technologies and maintenance care in each health state were obtained from official sources of reimbursement in Brazil. Deterministic and probabilistic, as well as scenario, sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Compared with the less costly strategy (nusinersen), the use of onasemnogene abeparvovec resulted in an incremental cost of R$2.468.448,06 ($975 671.169 - purchasing power parity [PPP]) and a 3-QALY increment and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$742.890,92 ($293 632.774 - PPP)/QALY. Risdiplam had an extended dominance from other strategies, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$926.586,22 ($366 239.612 - PPP)/QALY compared with nusinersen. Sensitivity analysis showed a significant impact of the follow-up time of the cohort and the cost of acquiring onasemnogene abeparvovec.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a lifetime horizon, onasemnogene abeparvovec seems to be a potentially more effective option than nusinersen and risdiplam, albeit with an incremental cost. Such a trade-off should be weighed in efficiency criteria during decision making and outcome monitoring from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System.

The impact of three SMN2 gene copies on clinical characteristics and effect of disease-modifying treatment in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic literature review

Objective

To review the clinical characteristics and effect of treatment in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and three copies of the SMN2 gene.

Methods

We conducted a literature search in October 2022 to identify English-language clinical research on SMA that included SMN2 copy number according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Our search identified 44 studies examining the impact of three SMN2 copies on clinical characteristics (21 on phenotype, 13 on natural history, and 15 on functional status and other signs/symptoms). In children with type I SMA or presymptomatic infants with an SMN1 deletion, three SMN2 copies was associated with later symptom onset, slower decline in motor function and longer survival compared with two SMN2 copies. In patients with SMA type II or III, three SMN2 copies is associated with earlier symptom onset, loss of ambulation, and ventilator dependence compared with four SMN2 copies. Eleven studies examined treatment effects with nusinersen (nine studies), onasemnogene abeparvovec (one study), and a range of treatments (one study) in patients with three SMN2 copies. In presymptomatic infants, early treatment delayed the onset of symptoms and maintained motor function in those with three SMN2 copies. The impact of copy number on treatment response in symptomatic patients is still unclear.

Conclusion

SMN2 copy number is strongly correlated with SMA phenotype in patients with SMN1 deletion, while no correlation was found in patients with an SMN1 mutation. Patients with three SMN2 copies show a highly variable clinical phenotype. Early initiation of treatment is highly effective in presymptomatic patients with three SMN2 copies.

Motor and neurocognitive profiles of children with symptomatic spinal muscular atrophy type 1 with two copies of SMN2 before and after treatment: a longitudinal observational study

Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. In clinical studies, gene replacement therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec (formerly AVXS-101, Zolgensma®, Novartis) was efficacious in improving motor functioning in children with SMA. However, its effects on cognitive and language skills are largely unknown.

Methods

This longitudinal observational study evaluated changes in motor and neurocognitive functioning over a 1-year period after administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec in 12 symptomatic SMA type 1 patients with two copies of SMN2 aged 1.7-52.6 months at administration. Motor functioning was measured using the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test for Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) while neurocognitive assessment was measured using Griffiths III. Motor milestones and language ability were also assessed at each timepoint.

Results and discussion

Statistically significant increases in median CHOP-INTEND scores from baseline were observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after onasemnogene abeparvovec administration (all p ≤ 0.005). Most (91.7%) patients were able to roll over or sit independently for >1 min at 12 months. Significant increases in the Griffiths III Foundations of Learning, Language and Communication, Eye and Hand Coordination, and Personal-Social-Emotional subscale scores were observed at 12-months, but not in the Gross Motor subscale. Speech and language abilities progressed in most patients. Overall, most patients showed some improvement in cognitive and communication performance after treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec in addition to significant improvement in motor functioning and motor milestones. Evaluation of neurocognitive function should be considered when assessing the global functioning of patients with SMA.

Onasemnogene Abeparvovec: Post-infusion Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)-A Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS Experience

Objective: The term Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) identifies a group of genetic disorders affecting spinal motor neurons. It is caused by the loss of the SMN1 gene, resulting in degeneration of spinal alpha motor neurons and muscle atrophy. This study is focused on innovative gene therapies with onasemnogene abeparvovec approved in Italy in March 2021 with full reimbursement by the National Health Service. The objective pursued is verify, by means of the CHOP-INTEND scores obtained, whether therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec led to an improvement in the clinical picture of the treated subjects and any adverse reactions that occurred. Methods: this study was conducted by evaluating the scores in the different re-evaluations of individual patients treated in our hospital (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS - Rome) and comparing them with the results of the CL-303 study described in SPC (Summary of Product Characteristics). The data were extracted from the patients' clinical records on the AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco - Italian Medicines Agency) registries, also collecting information on any post-infusion ADRs. Everything was then represented graphically to have a clear comparison with the data from the study registered for drug approval. Results: from the data obtained, 7 out of 8 patients improved their health status post infusion with, in some cases, a significant increase in score. Conclusions: this result allows us to understand how crucial it is to start treatment as soon as possible after the diagnosis of the condition as the greatest improvements were seen in subjects who received treatment within 2 months of birth.

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Monotherapy: Findings from the RESTORE Registry

Background

Long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety data of disease-modifying treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are important for assessing outcomes and providing information for a larger number and broader range of SMA patients than included in clinical trials.

Objective

We sought to describe patients with SMA treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy in the real-world setting.

Methods

RESTORE is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, observational registry that captures data from a variety of sources.

Results

Recruitment started in September 2018. As of May 23, 2022, data were available for 168 patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy. Median (IQR) age at initial SMA diagnosis was 1 (0-6) month and at onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion was 3 (1-10) months. Eighty patients (47.6%) had two and 70 (41.7%) had three copies of SMN2, and 98 (58.3%) were identified by newborn screening. Infants identified by newborn screening had a lower age at final assessment (mean age 11.5 months) and greater mean final (SD) CHOP INTEND score (57.0 [10.0] points) compared with clinically diagnosed patients (23.1 months; 52.1 [8.0] points). All patients maintained/achieved motor milestones. 48.5% (n = 81/167) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), and 31/167 patients (18.6%) experienced at least one serious AE, of which 8/31 were considered treatment-related.

Conclusion

These real-world outcomes support findings from the interventional trial program and demonstrate effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec over a large patient population, which was consistent with initial clinical data and published 5-year follow-up data. Observed AEs were consistent with the established safety profile of onasemnogene abeparvovec.

Consensus from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for the diagnosis, genetic counseling, and use of disease-modifying therapies in 5q spinal muscular atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy linked to chromosome 5 (SMA-5q) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by mutations in the SMN1. SMA-5q is characterized by progressive degeneration of the spinal cord and bulbar motor neurons, causing severe motor and respiratory impairment with reduced survival, especially in its more severe clinical forms. In recent years, highly effective disease-modifying therapies have emerged, either acting by regulating the splicing of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene or adding a copy of the SMN1 gene through gene therapy, providing a drastic change in the natural history of the disease. In this way, developing therapeutic guides and expert consensus becomes essential to direct the use of these therapies in clinical practice. This consensus, prepared by Brazilian experts, aimed to review the main available disease-modifying therapies, critically analyze the results of clinical studies, and provide recommendations for their use in clinical practice for patients with SMA-5q. This consensus also addresses aspects related to diagnosis, genetic counseling, and follow-up of patients under drug treatment. Thus, this consensus provides valuable information regarding the current management of SMA-5q, helping therapeutic decisions in clinical practice and promoting additional gains in outcomes.

Repeated AAV9 Titer Determination in a Presymptomatic SMA Patient with Three SMN2 Gene Copies - A Case Report

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are well-suited to serve as gene transfer vectors. Onasemnogene abeparvovec uses AAV9 as virus vector. Previous exposure to wild-type AAVs or placental transfer of maternal AAV antibodies, however, can trigger an immune response to the vector virus which may limit the therapeutic effectiveness of gene transfer and impact safety. We present the case of a female patient with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and three survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies. The infant had elevated titers of AAV9 antibodies at diagnosis at 9 days of age. Being presymptomatic at diagnosis, it was decided to retest the patient's AAV9 antibody titer at two-weekly intervals. Six weeks after initial diagnosis, a titer of 1:12.5 allowed treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec. The presented case demonstrates that, provided the number of SMN2 gene copies and the absence of symptoms allow, onasemnogene abeparvovec therapy is feasible in patients with initially exclusionary AAV9 antibody titers of >1:50.

Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibody seroprevalence for patients in the United States with spinal muscular atrophy

Onasemnogene abeparvovec is a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) vector-based gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Patients with elevated titers of anti-AAV9 antibodies (AAV9-Ab) should not receive onasemnogene abeparvovec because of potential safety and efficacy implications. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the seroprevalence of anti-AAV9 binding antibodies for pediatric patients with SMA in the United States. At initial testing, 13.0% (115 of 882) of patients (mean [SD] age, 26.29 [33.66] weeks) had elevated AAV9-Ab titers. The prevalence of elevated titers decreased as age increased, with 18.2% (92 of 507) of patients ≤3 months old but only 1.1% (1 of 92) of patients ≥21 months old having elevated titers. This suggests transplacental maternal transfer of antibodies. No patterns of geographic variations in AAV9-Ab prevalence were confirmed. Elevated AAV9-Ab titers in children <6 weeks old decreased in all circumstances. Lower magnitudes of elevated titers declined more rapidly than greater magnitudes. Retesting was completed at the discretion of the treating clinician, so age at testing and time between tests varied. AAV9-Ab retesting should be considered when patients have elevated titers, and elevations at a young age are not a deterrent to eventual onasemnogene abeparvovec administration. Early disease-modifying treatment for SMA leads to optimal outcomes.

High-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) concentrations in newborns diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy

Background

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neurodegenerative disease leading to muscular weakness and premature death. Three therapeutic options are currently available including gene replacement therapy (GRT), which is potentially cardiotoxic. High-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) is widely used to monitor potential cardiac contraindications or side effects of GRT, but reference data in healthy newborns are limited and lacking in neonates with SMA. The aim of this study is to determine the range of pre-therapeutic hs-cTnI concentrations in neonates with SMA and to provide guidance for the assessment of these values.

Methods

Hs-cTnI levels, genetic and clinical data of 30 newborns (age range 2-26 days) with SMA were retrospectively collected from 6 German neuromuscular centers. In addition, hs-cTnI levels were measured in 16 neonates without SMA.

Results

The median hs-cTnI concentration in neonates with SMA was 39.5 ng/L (range: 4-1205). In 16 newborns with SMA, hs-cTnI levels were above the test-specific upper reference limit (URL). Exploratory statistical analysis revealed no relevant correlation between hs-cTnI levels and gender, gestational age, mode of delivery, SMN2 copy number, symptoms of SMA or abnormal cardiac findings.

Discussion

Our results suggest higher hs-cTnI plasma levels in newborns with and without SMA compared to assay-specific reference values generated in adults. Given the wide range of hs-cTnI values in neonates with SMA, hs-cTnI levels must be determined before treatment in each patient and post-treatment elevations should be interpreted in the context of the course rather than as individual values.

Pharmacological Therapies of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Narrative Review of Preclinical, Clinical-Experimental, and Real-World Evidence

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 10,000 live births. To date, three orphan drugs have been approved for the treatment of SMA: nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the pharmacological treatments approved for the treatment of SMA by identifying preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov and in the EU PAS register from their inception until the 4 January 2023. The preclinical evidence on the drugs approved for SMA allowed a significant acceleration in the experimental phase of these drugs. However, since these drugs had been authorized through accelerated programs, the conduction of post-marketing studies was requested as a condition of their marketing approval to better understand their risk-benefit profiles in real-world settings. As of the 4 January 2023, a total of 69 post-marketing studies concerning the three orphan drugs approved for SMA were identified in clinicaltrials.gov (N = 65; 94.2%) and in the EU PAS register (N = 4; 5.8%). Currently, ongoing studies are primarily aimed at providing evidence concerning the risk-benefit profile of the three drugs in specific populations that were not included in the pivotal trials and to investigate the long-term safety and clinical benefits of these drugs. Real-world data sources collecting information regarding the natural history of the disease and post-marketing surveillance of the available therapies are increasingly becoming essential for generating real-world evidence on this rare disease and its orphan drugs.

Epithelioid neoplasm of the spinal cord in a child with spinal muscular atrophy treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec

Spinal muscular atrophy is an autosomal recessive disease resulting in motor neuron degeneration and progressive life-limiting motor deficits when untreated. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is an adeno-associated virus serotype 9-based gene therapy that improves survival, motor function, and motor milestone achievement in symptomatic and presymptomatic patients. Although the adeno-associated virus genome is maintained as an episome, theoretical risk of tumorigenicity persists should genomic insertion occur. We present the case of a 16-month-old male with spinal muscular atrophy who was diagnosed with an epithelioid neoplasm of the spinal cord approximately 14 months after receiving onasemnogene abeparvovec. In situ hybridization analysis detected an onasemnogene abeparvovec nucleic acid signal broadly distributed in many but not all tumor cells. Integration site analysis on patient formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples failed to detect high-confidence integration sites of onasemnogene abeparvovec. The finding was considered inconclusive because of limited remaining tissue/DNA input. The improved life expectancy resulting from innovative spinal muscular atrophy therapies, including onasemnogene abeparvovec, has created an opportunity to analyze the long-term adverse events and durability of these therapies as well as identify potential disease associations that were previously unrecognized because of the premature death of these patients.

Liver injury in cynomolgus monkeys following intravenous and intrathecal scAAV9 gene therapy delivery

Hepatotoxicity associated with intravenous/intrathecal adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy has been observed in preclinical species and patients. In nonhuman primates, hepatotoxicity following self-complementary AAV9 administration varies from asymptomatic transaminase elevation with minimal to mild microscopic changes to symptomatic elevations of liver function and thromboinflammatory markers with microscopic changes consistent with marked hepatocellular necrosis and deteriorating clinical condition. These transient acute liver injury marker elevations occur from 3-4 days post intravenous administration to ∼2 weeks post intrathecal administration. No transaminase elevation or microscopic changes were observed with intrathecal administration of empty capsids or a "promoterless genome" vector, suggesting that liver injury after cerebrospinal fluid dosing in nonhuman primates is driven by viral transduction and transgene expression. Co-administration of prednisolone after intravenous or intrathecal dosing did not prevent liver enzyme or microscopic changes despite a reduction of T lymphocyte infiltration in liver tissue. Similarly, co-administration of rituximab/everolimus with intrathecal dosing failed to block AAV-driven hepatotoxicity. Self-complementary AAV-induced acute liver injury appears to correlate with high hepatocellular vector load, macrophage activation, and type 1 interferon innate virus-sensing pathway responses. The current work characterizes key aspects pertaining to early AAV-driven hepatotoxicity in cynomolgus macaques, highlighting the usefulness of this nonclinical species in that context.

Gene transfer therapy in children with spinal muscular atrophy: A single-center experience with a cohort of 25 children

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

New therapeutic strategies to increase survival motor neuron protein levels in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have focused on replacing the SMN1 gene. Onasemnogene abeparvovec was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for treatment of children with SMA less than 2 years of age. Postmarketing studies are limited, especially outside of Europe and the United States. Herein we describe a single-center experience with onasemnogene abeparvovec from the Middle East.

METHODS

Between November 17, 2020 and January 31, 2022, 25 children with SMA received onasemnogene abeparvovec at our center in the United Arab Emirates. Data were collected on patients' demographics, age at diagnosis, SMA type, genetic information, relevant medical history, laboratory investigations, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) functional assessment scores at baseline and 1 and 3 months after gene therapy.

RESULTS

Onasemnogene abeparvovec was well tolerated. Significant improvements in CHOP-INTEND scores were observed after the therapy. Elevation of liver enzymes and thrombocytopenia were the most common adverse events, but were transient and managed with high-dose corticosteroids. There were no life-threatening adverse events or deaths reported during the 3-month follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

The study findings concurred with those of previously published studies. Side effects of gene transfer therapy are well tolerated, although serious complications can arise. In such cases, persistent transaminitis for example, steroid dose escalation is warranted with close observation of the patient's clinical status and lab values. Combination therapy should be explored as an alternative to gene transfer therapy only.

Expanding the Availability of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec to Older Patients: The Evolving Treatment Landscape for Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a devastating neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, which leads to a reduced level in the SMN protein within cells. Patients with SMA suffer from a loss of alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord leading to skeletal muscle atrophy in addition to deficits in other tissues and organs. Patients with severe forms of the disease require ventilator assistance and typically succumb to the disease due to respiratory failure. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapeutic that has been approved for infants and young children with SMA, and it is delivered through intravenous administration using a dose based on the weight of the patient. While excellent outcomes have been observed in treated patients, the greater viral dose necessary to treat older children and adults raises legitimate safety concerns. Recently, onasemnogene abeparvovec use was investigated in older children through a fixed dose and intrathecal administration, a route that provides a more direct delivery to affected cells in the spinal cord and central nervous system. The promising results observed in the STRONG trial may support approval of onasemnogene abeparvovec for a greater proportion of patients with SMA.

Recommendations for economic evaluations of cell and gene therapies: a systematic literature review with critical appraisal

OBJECTIVE

No consensus exists on the ideal methodology to evaluate the economic impact and value of new, potentially curative gene therapies. We aimed to identify and describe published methodologic recommendations for the economic evaluation of gene therapies and assess whether these recommendations have been applied in published evaluations.

METHODS

This study was conducted in three stages: a systematic literature review of methodologic recommendations for economic evaluation of gene therapies; an assessment of the appropriateness of recommendations; and a review to assess the degree to which the recommendations were applied in published evaluations.

RESULTS

A total of 2,888 references were screened, 83 articles were reviewed to assess eligibility, and 20 papers were included. Fifty recommendations were identified, and 21 reached consensus thresholds. Most evaluations were based on naive treatment comparisons and did not apply consensus recommendations. Innovative payment mechanisms for gene therapies were rarely considered. The only widely applied recommendations related to modeling choices and methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodological recommendations for economic evaluations of gene therapies are generally not being followed. Assessing the applicability and impact of the recommendations from this study may facilitate the implementation of consensus recommendations in future evaluations.

A breakthrough effect of gene replacement therapy on respiratory outcomes in children with spinal muscular atrophy

INTRODUCTION

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited progressive neuromuscular disorder characterized by generalized hypotonia, respiratory failure and early death. The introduction of gene replacement therapy (GRT) modified the natural history of the disease. However, more data is needed to understand the long-term effect of GRT on measurable respiratory outcomes. We report the respiratory outcomes in our cohort of patients with SMA post-GRT in 2-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective chart-review of genetically confirmed children with SMA who received GRT between 2019 and 2021 in Qatar. The evaluated respiratory outcomes were chronic respiratory support, respiratory hospitalizations, escalation of respiratory support and polysomnography results before and after GRT. Nonrespiratory outcomes; nutritional status, swallowing, and motor functions; were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients (9 patients with SMA-1 and 2 patients with SMA-2) received GRT at a median age of 12 months and 22 months in patients with SMA-1 and SMA-2, respectively. All patients were successfully weaned off Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) except one patient who remained on mechanical ventilation through tracheostomy tube. The annualized hospitalization rate dropped by half after GRT. The average length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) decreased by 17.32 days/patient/year after GRT. Duration of required escalation of respiratory support during acute hospitalizations has dropped by 18.56 days/patient/year post-GRT.

CONCLUSION

We report favorable respiratory outcomes of GRT in our cohort. GRT resulted in discontinuation of chronic respiratory support in majority of ventilated patients. GRT also resulted in decreased respiratory hospitalization rate, hospital-LOS, ICU-LOS, and need for escalation of ventilatory support.

Review of economic modeling evidence from NICE appraisals of rare disease treatments for spinal muscular atrophy

INTRODUCTION

The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England has appraised three treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), namely, nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. As rare disease treatments (RDTs) commonly face challenges in health technology assessment (HTA) processes due to their clinical and economic uncertainties, an in-depth review of these appraisals is useful to enable a deeper understanding of economic modelling considerations for SMA.

AREAS COVERED

This review is a detailed analysis of NICE appraisals for SMA and aims to compare the economic modelling evidence of the three RDTs. This is done by examining differences and similarities and by discussing critical outstanding issues across the economic evaluations of the appraisals.

EXPERT OPINION

This article aims to contribute to the development of evidence that can be used as guidance to inform resource allocation decisions for RDTs for SMA, but also to be a resource about approaches for the generation, analysis and interpretation of economic modelling evidence for RDTs more broadly.

Safety and efficacy of gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease which leads to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in SMA patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane through April 2022. Ten reports enrolling 250 SMA patients were included. CHOP INTEND and motor-milestone significant improvements were detected at both short- and long-term follow-up. Common adverse events included pyrexia, vomiting, thrombocytopenia and elevated aminotransferases. Thrombocytopenia (79.3%, 95%CI: 65.8~90.5) and elevated aminotransferases (71.7%, 95%CI: 62.5~80.1) were more common in SMA patients aged older than 8 months. Despite the paucity of randomized control trial data and low quality of evidence to establish the safety and efficacy of onasemnogene abeparvovec in the treatment of SMA, the data suggest that it is a valuable option for patients with this condition.

Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 Achieve and Maintain Bulbar Function Following Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Treatment

BACKGROUND

Improvement and maintenance of bulbar function are goals of disease-modifying treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Lack of standardized measures and a widely accepted definition of bulbar function represents a gap in SMA care.

OBJECTIVE

A multidisciplinary team conducted post-hoc analyses of pooled data from one phase 1 (START) and two phase 3 (STR1VE-US, STR1VE-EU) studies to define and evaluate bulbar function of infants with SMA type 1 after receiving one-time gene replacement therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec.

METHODS

We defined bulbar function as the ability to meet nutritional needs while maintaining airway protection and the ability to communicate verbally. Four endpoints represented adequate bulbar function: (1) absence of clinician-identified physiologic swallowing impairment, (2) receiving full oral nutrition, (3) absence of adverse events indicating pulmonary instability, and (4) the ability to vocalize at least two different, distinct vowel sounds. We descriptively assessed numbers/percentages of patients who achieved each endpoint and all four collectively. Patients were followed until 18 months old (STR1VE-US and STR1VE-EU) or 24 months (START) post-infusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 65 patients were analyzed for swallowing, nutrition intake, and adverse events, and 20 were analyzed for communication. At study end, 92% (60/65) of patients had a normal swallow, 75% (49/65) achieved full oral nutrition, 92% (60/65) had no evidence of pulmonary instability, 95% (19/20) met the communication endpoint, and 75% (15/20) achieved all four bulbar function components in the composite endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

In these three clinical trials, patients with SMA type 1 who received onasemnogene abeparvovec achieved and maintained the bulbar function criteria utilized within this investigation.

Intrathecal Onasemnogene Abeparvovec for Sitting, Nonambulatory Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Phase I Ascending-Dose Study (STRONG)

BACKGROUND

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder arising from biallelic non-functional survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) genes with variable copies of partially functional SMN2 gene. Intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec administration, at fixed, low doses, may enable treatment of heavier patients ineligible for weight-based intravenous dosing.

OBJECTIVE

STRONG (NCT03381729) assessed the safety/tolerability and efficacy of intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec for sitting, nonambulatory SMA patients.

METHODS

Sitting, nonambulatory SMA patients (biallelic SMN1 loss, three SMN2 copies, aged 6-<60 months) received a single dose of intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec. Patients were enrolled sequentially into one of three (low, medium, and high) dose cohorts and stratified into two groups by age at dosing: younger (6-<24 months) and older (24-<60 months). Primary endpoints included safety/tolerability, independent standing ≥3 seconds (younger group), and change in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) from baseline (older group) compared with historic controls.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled and completed the study (medium dose, n = 25). All patients had one or more treatment-emergent adverse events, with one serious and related to treatment (transaminase elevations). No deaths were reported. One of 13 patients (7.7%) in the younger group treated with the medium dose achieved independent standing. At Month 12 for the older group receiving the medium dose, change from baseline in HFMSE was significantly improved compared with the SMA historic control population (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal onasemnogene abeparvovec was safe and well-tolerated. Older patients treated with the medium dose demonstrated increases in HFMSE score greater than commonly observed in natural history.

Newborn screening and gene therapy in SMA: Challenges related to vaccinations

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) affects one in 7,500-10,000 newborns. Before the era of disease-modifying therapies, it used to be the major genetic cause of mortality in infants. Currently, there are three therapies approved for SMA, including two molecules modifying the splicing of the SMN2 gene and one gene therapy providing a healthy copy of the SMN gene with a viral vector. The best effects of any of these therapies are achieved when the treatment is administered in the presymptomatic stage of the disease, therefore newborn screening programs are being introduced in many countries. Patients identified in newborn screening might be eligible for gene therapy. However, gene therapy and the associated administration of steroids in newborns might interfere with the vaccination schedule, which includes live immunization against tuberculosis in some countries. The timing of gene therapy in patients who received live vaccinations has not yet been addressed neither in the clinical trials nor in the existing international guidelines. The Polish Vaccinology Association has developed the first recommendations for gene therapy administration in newborns who received live vaccination against tuberculosis. Their statement was implemented in the current guidelines for Polish SMA patients identified in the newborn screening program and might be helpful for medical professionals in other countries where live vaccine against tuberculosis is still in routine use in newborns.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis following gene replacement therapy in a child with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is the first gene replacement therapy for the treatment of paediatric patients with bi-allelic mutations in the SMN1 gene. Efficacy and safety of OA have been assessed in several studies with promising results, despite rare side effects have been described.

CASE SUMMARY

A 3-year-old child with spinal muscular atrophy was treated with OA and subsequently developed fever, widespread erythematous skin lesions and hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory tests were suggestive for Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case of HLH following gene replacement therapy with OA, described in literature.

Onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy

INTRODUCTION

Gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) represents a significant milestone in the treatment of neurologic diseases. SMA is a neurodegenerative disease that results in motor neuron loss because of mutations of the survival motor neuron 1 gene, which directs survival motor neuron (SMN) protein production. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time gene replacement therapy, delivers a functional transgene to restore SMN protein expression. Onasemnogene abeparvovec has demonstrated improved survival and motor milestone achievements for presymptomatic infants and patients with SMA type 1.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the current state of gene therapy for SMA, reviews the mechanism of and clinical experience with onasemnogene abeparvovec, explains future efforts to expand applications of gene therapy for SMA, and provides context for developing gene therapy for other conditions.

EXPERT OPINION

Onasemnogene abeparvovec has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and, because of this, is a valuable treatment option for patients with symptomatic infantile SMA and those identified by newborn screening. Gene therapy is still in its infancy, and challenges and uncertainties associated with transgene delivery must be addressed. With ongoing development of vector technology, more specific tissue tropism, reduced "off-target" effects, and an enhanced safety profile will continue to evolve.

How does risdiplam compare with other treatments for Types 1-3 spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison

Aim: To conduct indirect treatment comparisons between risdiplam and other approved treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Patients & methods: Individual patient data from risdiplam trials were compared with aggregated data from published studies of nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec, accounting for heterogeneity across studies. Results: In Type 1 SMA, studies of risdiplam and nusinersen included similar populations. Indirect comparison results found improved survival and motor function with risdiplam versus nusinersen. Comparison with onasemnogene abeparvovec in Type 1 SMA and with nusinersen in Types 2/3 SMA was challenging due to substantial differences in study populations; no concrete conclusions could be drawn from the indirect comparison analyses. Conclusion: Indirect comparisons support risdiplam as a superior alternative to nusinersen in Type 1 SMA.

Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 9 Gene Therapy in Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease caused by deletion or mutation of the SMN1 gene. It is characterized by a progressive loss of motor neurons resulting in muscle weakness. The disease affects 1 in 11,000 live births and before the era of treatment SMA was a leading genetic cause of mortality in infants. Recently, disease modifying therapies have been introduced in clinical practice. They include intrathecal and oral antisense oligonucleotides binding to pre-mRNA of SMN2 gene and increasing the translation of fully functional SMN protein as well as SMN1 gene replacement therapy. Onasemnogene abeparvovec uses the adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) vector to deliver the SMN1 gene. Phase 1 and phase 3 clinical trials showed that a single administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec resulted in improvement of motor functions in the majority of infants with SMA. Currently, phase 3 trials in SMA1 and SMA2 patients, as well as presymptomatic infants diagnosed with SMA, are ongoing. The drug was approved for medical use in the US in 2019, and in Japan and the European Union in 2020. Thus, first real-world data on efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in SMA patients are available.

Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of onasemnogene abeparvovec and nusinersen for the treatment of symptomatic patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1

OBJECTIVE

Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time intravenous gene replacement therapy, and nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide that requires ongoing intrathecal administration, have been evaluated as treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 in separate Phase III trials, but no head-to-head comparison studies have been conducted. Onasemnogene abeparvovec was compared with nusinersen using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to estimate the treatment effect of onasemnogene abeparvovec relative to nusinersen for the treatment of symptomatic patients with SMA type 1 for up to 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

In the absence of studies for both onasemnogene abeparvovec and nusinersen with a common comparator, a Bayesian naïve indirect treatment comparison (ITC) and MAIC between onasemnogene abeparvovec and nusinersen were conducted to compare efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec with nusinersen. Outcomes of interest were event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and motor milestone achievements (independent sitting and independent walking). Relative treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and risk difference.

RESULTS

Pooled and weighted patient-level data illustrated a favorable effect toward onasemnogene abeparvovec, suggesting longer EFS for patients compared with nusinersen (HR of onasemnogene abeparvovec vs. nusinersen: 0.19 [95% CI: 0.07-0.54; 99% CI: 0.05-0.74]). At 24 months of follow-up, patients receiving onasemnogene abeparvovec were statistically significantly more likely to achieve the motor milestone of sitting independently compared with patients treated with nusinersen. Although statistically significant differences were not observed at 6 to 18 months between treatment options, the likelihood of sitting independently at 12 and 18 months numerically favored onasemnogene abeparvovec. A numerically greater likelihood of walking by 18 and 24 months was also observed for patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec compared with nusinersen. Onasemnogene abeparvovec therapy was also associated with a favorable (but statistically nonsignificant) outcome for OS and may be associated with prolonged survival compared with nusinersen (HR of onasemnogene abeparvovec vs. nusinersen: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.09-1.32; 99% CI: 0.06-2.01]). Bayesian naïve ITC results were similar to the MAIC analysis for EFS, OS, and motor milestone achievements. Small sample size limited covariate matching to baseline CHOP INTEND and nutritional support requirement, leading to wider CIs and statistically inconclusive outcomes for some of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations of the current MAIC analysis (mainly a small sample size for statistical testing, even for the pooled onasemnogene abeparvovec trials, and potential differences in prognostic and predictive factors between studies), the relative treatment effects in EFS, OS, and motor milestone achievement indicate that onasemnogene abeparvovec may offer continued benefit compared with nusinersen through 24 months of follow-up.

Expert recommendations and clinical considerations in the use of onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disease caused by biallelic mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. SMA is characterized by motor neuron degeneration, resulting in progressive muscle atrophy and weakness. Before the emergence of disease-modifying therapies, children with the most severe form of SMA would never achieve the ability to sit independently. Only 8% survived beyond 20 months of age without permanent ventilator support. One such therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec, an adeno-associated virus-based gene replacement therapy, delivers functional human SMN through a one-time intravenous infusion. In addition to substantially improving survival, onasemnogene abeparvovec was found to increase motor milestone attainment and reduce the need for respiratory or nutritional support in many patients. This expert opinion provides recommendations and practical considerations on the patient-centered decisions to use onasemnogene abeparvovec. Recommendations include the need for patient-centered multidisciplinary care and patient selection to identify those with underlying medical conditions or active infections to reduce risks. We also describe the importance of retesting patients with elevated anti-adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibodies. Recommendations for prednisolone tapering and monitoring for potential adverse events, including hepatotoxicity and thrombotic microangiopathy, are described. The need for caregiver education on managing day-to-day care at time of treatment and patient- and family-centered discussions on realistic expectations are also recommended. We detail the importance of following standard-of-care guidance and long-term monitoring of all children with SMA who have received one or more disease-modifying therapy using registries. We also highlight the need for presymptomatic or early symptomatic treatment of this disorder.

Therapeutic interventions for spinal muscular atrophy: preclinical and early clinical development opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative neuromuscular disease that presents primarily in children. Abnormalities in the SMN1 gene cause reduced levels of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, while a second gene, SMN2, produces low levels of functional SMN protein. Currently available drugs do not cure, so a significant unmet need remains for patients treated after symptom onset.

AREAS COVERED

Drugs available in the clinic, investigational agents and key questions for researchers are discussed. A pragmatic search of the literature was performed to identify therapies in late stages of preclinical, or in early stages of clinical development. This list was compared to the CureSMA pipeline for completeness. Drugs approved for indications that have potential for impact for SMA were included. These drugs target the primary deficiency in SMN protein or other pathways involved in SMA pathophysiology that are not SMN-protein dependent.

EXPERT OPINION

Children treated after the onset of symptoms continue to have significant disability. Given the heterogeneity of the population phenotype evidenced by variable response to initial therapy, age at treatment onset and the need to demonstrate added value beyond approved therapeutics, the clinical development of new drugs will be challenging.

Safety Monitoring of Gene Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy with Onasemnogene Abeparvovec -A Single Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

Recently gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). As the experience from clinical trials is limited, there are still uncertainties for which patient population the treatment can be considered safe and effective.

METHODS

We report our experience with eight consecutive patients with SMA who were treated with the standard dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec (1.1×1014 vg/kg) at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. All patients received prophylactic immunosuppression with 1 mg/kg/d prednisolone for four weeks starting on the day before gene therapy.

RESULTS

We treated eight patients (4 male, 4 female, age range 10-37 months) with a body weight between 7.1 and 11.9 kg. All patients had 2 or 3 copies of the SMN2-gene and were previously treated with nusinersen. Following treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec all patients showed a temporary increase of the body temperature and an increase of transaminase levels. In all but one patient it was necessary to increase or prolong the standard steroid dose to control the immune response. In one severe case, liver damage was associated with impaired liver function. This patient received a steroid pulse therapy for five days. Blood counts revealed asymptomatic thrombocytopenia (<150×109/L) in 6/8 patients and a significant increase of monocytes following gene therapy. Liver values and blood counts returned to almost normal levels during the post-treatment observation period. Troponin I increased above normal limit in 4/8 patients but was not associated with any abnormalities on cardiac evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a broader spectrum of patients, treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec was associated with a higher rate of adverse events. In our cases it was possible to control the immune response by close monitoring and adaptation of the immunosuppressive regimen. Further research is needed to better understand the immune response following gene therapy and ideally to identify patients at risk for a more severe reaction.

An updated cost-utility model for onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients and comparison with evaluation by the Institute for Clinical and Effectiveness Review (ICER)

Background: Recent cost-utility analysis (CUA) models for onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®, formerly AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) differ on key assumptions and results. Objective: To compare the manufacturer's proprietary CUA model to the model published by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), and to update the manufacturer's model with long-term follow-up data and some key ICER assumptions. Study design: We updated a recent CUA evaluating value for money in cost per incremental Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) of onasemnogene abeparvovec versus nusinersen (Spinraza®) or best supportive care (BSC) in symptomatic SMA1 patients, and compared it to the ICER model. Setting/Perspective: USA/Commercial payer Participants: Children aged <2 years with SMA1. Interventions: Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a single-dose gene replacement therapy, versus nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide, versus BSC. Main outcome measure: Incremental-cost effectiveness ratio and value-based price using traditional thresholds for general medicines in the US. Results: Updated survival (undiscounted) predicted by the model was 37.60 years for onasemnogene abeparvovec compared to 12.10 years for nusinersen and 7.27 years for BSC. Updated quality-adjusted survival using ICER's utility scores and discounted at 3% were 13.33, 2.85, and 1.15 discounted QALYs for onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen, and BSC, respectively. Using estimated net prices, the discounted lifetime cost/patient was $3.93 M for onasemnogene abeparvovec, $4.60 M for nusinersen, and $1.96 M for BSC. The incremental cost per QALY gained for onasemnogene abeparvovec was dominant against nusinersen and $161,648 against BSC. These results broadly align with the results of the ICER model, which predicted a cost per QALY gained of $139,000 compared with nusinersen, and $243,000 compared with BSC (assuming a placeholder price of $2 M for onasemnogene abeparvovec), differences in methodology notwithstanding. Exploratory analyses in presymptomatic patients were similar. Conclusion: This updated CUA model is similar to ICER analyses comparing onasemnogene abeparvovec with nusinersen in the symptomatic and presymptomatic SMA populations. At a list price of $2.125 M, onasemnogene abeparvovec is cost-effective compared to nusinersen for SMA1 patients treated before age 2 years. When compared to BSC, cost per QALY of onasemnogene abeparvovec is higher than commonly used thresholds for therapies in the USA ($150,000 per QALY).

Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibodies in patients screened for treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec

Spinal muscular atrophy is a progressive, recessively inherited monogenic neurologic disease, the genetic root cause of which is the absence of a functional survival motor neuron 1 gene. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (formerly AVXS-101) is an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 vector-based gene therapy that delivers a fully functional copy of the human survival motor neuron gene. We report anti-adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibody titers for patients with spinal muscular atrophy when they were screened for eligibility in the onasemnogene abeparvovec clinical trials (intravenous and intrathecal administration) and managed access programs (intravenous). Through December 31, 2019, 196 patients and 155 biologic mothers were screened for anti-adeno-associated virus serotype 9 binding antibodies with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of these, 15 patients (7.7%) and 23 biologic mothers (14.8%) had titers >1:50 on their initial screening tests. Eleven patients (5.6%) had elevated titers on their final screening tests. The low percentage of patients with exclusionary antibody titers indicates that most infants with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 should be able to receive onasemnogene abeparvovec. Retesting may identify patients whose antibody titers later decrease to below the threshold for treatment, and retesting should be considered for patients with anti-adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibody titers >1:50.

2020 Update to Spinal Muscular Atrophy Management in Saudi Arabia

Novel therapeutic strategies have shown some promise in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). However, the outcomes and acceptance of these new strategies are yet to be explored. We aimed to investigate physicians' opinions and perceptions toward management strategies of SMA across Saudi Arabia. This is a cross-sectional survey using a self-administered, structured questionnaire sent to physicians who care for SMA patients during the Saudi Pediatric Neurology Society annual conference. A total of 72 clinicians of different neurological subspecialties were included. 48.6% prescribed nusinersen to their patients, with 39% of them having patients started on nusinersen. Though, 8.3% prescribed onasemnogene abeparvovec for 1-3 patients, while none of their patients started on the treatment. 64.3% stated that the only treatment available for SMA in their settings is supportive care. Around 69.4% described having a moderate to high knowledge on SMA gene therapy, and 79.2% would recommend it. 48.6% confirmed they would prescribe gene therapy at the age of 6 months, and 78.3% would prescribe it for type-I SMA. Pediatric neurologists are receptive to novel and innovative therapies for SMA in Saudi Arabia. However, the high treatment acquisition cost, strict regulations, logistical issues, and budget constraints delay their adoption and implementation.

New Treatments in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Positive Results and New Challenges

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the most common autosomal recessive diseases with progressive weakness of skeletal and respiratory muscles, leading to significant disability. The disorder is caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene and a consequent decrease in the SMN protein leading to lower motor neuron degeneration. Recently, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Agency (EMA) approved the antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, the first SMA disease-modifying treatment and gene replacement therapy by onasemnogene abeparvovec. Encouraging results from phase II and III clinical trials have raised hope that other therapeutic options will enter soon in clinical practice. However, the availability of effective approaches has raised up ethical, medical and financial issues that are routinely faced by the SMA community. This review covers the available data and the new challenges of SMA therapeutic strategies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a devastating genetic disease for which gene-replacement therapy may bring substantial survival and quality of life benefits. Objective: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy for SMA1. Study design: A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of AVXS-101 versus nusinersen over a lifetime. Survival, healthcare costs and QALYs were estimated using natural history data for SMA patients who achieved motor milestones (sitting/walking). Health utility weights were obtained from the CHERISH trial. Setting: USA; commercial payer perspective Participants: SMA1 infants Interventions: AVXS-101 was compared to nusinersen. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was the ICER. Results: Expected survival (undiscounted) over a lifetime predicted by the model was 37.20 life years for AVXS-101 and 9.68 for nusinersen (discounted QALYs, 15.65 and 5.29, respectively). Using a potential AVXS-101 price range ($2.5-5.0M/treatment), the average lifetime cost/patient was $4.2-6.6M for AVXS-101 and $6.3M for nusinersen. The ICER range was (-$203,072) to $31,379 per QALY gained for AVXS-101 versus nusinersen, indicating that AVXS-101 was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M. Conclusion: Single-dose AVXS-101 was cost-effective compared to chronic nusinersen for SMA1 patients.