Highlighting and addressing barriers to widespread adaptation of HIV self-testing in the United States

INTRODUCTION

HIV self-testing (HIVST), whereby an individual performs and interprets their own rapid screening test at home, is another tool to increase the proportion of at-risk individuals who know their status. Globally, HIVST has rapidly been adopted through global partnerships to ensure equitable access to tests in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

AREA COVERED

This review discusses the regulatory burdens of HIV self-testing within the United States while examining the use of HIV self-tests on a global scale. While the United States only has one approved HIV self-test, numerous tests have been prequalified by the WHO.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of the first and only self-test in 2012, there have been no other tests that have undergone FDA consideration due to regulatory barriers. This, in turn, has stifled market competition. Despite existing evidence that such programs are an innovative approach to testing hesitant or hard-to-reach populations, high individual test cost and bulky packaging make large-scale, mail-out, and HIV self-testing programs expensive. COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the public demand for self-testing - HIV self-test programs should capitalize on this to increase the proportion of at-risk people who know their status and are linked to care to contribute to ending the HIV epidemic.

"If it is left, it becomes easy for me to get tested": Use of oral self-tests and community health workers to maximize the potential of home-based HIV testing among adolescents in Lesotho

INTRODUCTION

Home-based HIV testing fails to reach high coverage among adolescents and young adults (AYA), mainly because they are often absent during the day of home-based testing. ADORE (ADolescent ORal tEsting) is a mixed-method nested study among AYA in rural Lesotho, measuring the effect of home-based secondary distribution of oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) on coverage, as well as exploring how AYA perceive this HIV self-testing model.

METHODS

ADORE study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial. In intervention village-clusters, oral HIVST were left for household members who were absent or declined testing during a testing campaign. One present household member was trained on HIVST use. Distributed HIVST were followed up by village health workers (VHW). In control clusters no self-tests were distributed. The quantitative outcome was testing coverage among AYA (age 12 to 24) within 120 days, defined as a confirmed HIV test result or known status, using adjusted random-effects logistic regression on the intention-to-treat population. Qualitatively, we conducted in-depth interviews among both AYA who used and did not use the distributed HIVST.

RESULTS

From July 2018 to December 2018, 49 and 57 villages with 1471 and 1620 consenting households and 1236 and 1445 AYA in the control and intervention arm, respectively, were enrolled. On the day of the home-visit, a testing coverage of 37% (461/1236) and 41% (596/1445) in the control and the intervention arm, respectively, were achieved. During the 120 days follow-up period, an additional 23 and 490 AYA in control and intervention clusters, respectively, knew their status. This resulted in a testing coverage of 484/1236 (39%) in the control versus 1086/1445 (75%) in the intervention arm (aOR 8.80 [95% CI 5.81 to 13.32]; p < 0.001). 21 interviews were performed. Personal assistance after the secondary distribution emerged as a key theme and VHWs were generally seen as a trusted cadre.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary distribution of HIVST for AYA absent or refusing to test during home-based testing in Lesotho resulted in an absolute 36% increase in coverage. Distribution should, however, go along with clear instructions on the use of the HIVST and a possibility to easily access more personal support.