Surgical Construct Type Is Associated With Time to Fusion and Reoperation Rate in Double and Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodeses

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the effect of surgical construct on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing isolated talonavicular (TN) or double (TN and subtalar ST) arthrodesis. TN constructs included plate and screw, screw and staple, and isolated staple constructs. Subtalar constructs included 1- and 2-screw constructs.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 52 patients who underwent double or isolated TN arthrodesis between 2016 and 2021 by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon with minimum 6 months of follow-up (mean = 1.62 years, range = 0.50-4.39 years). Data collected included demographics, medical history, surgical indication, surgical constructs used, complications, reoperations, patient-reported outcome measures, and radiographic measures.

RESULTS

Overall complication and reoperation rates were 26.3% and 12.3%, respectively. Among TN constructs, time to ST (P = .026) and TN (P = .018) fusion was significantly slower among patients receiving a plate and screw construct. Complication rate did not differ, but reoperation rate was significantly higher for plate and screw TN constructs (P = .039). Postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) Quality of Life (P = .028) and Total (P = .016) scores were significantly better among plate and screw TN constructs.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of screw and staple or isolated staple construct have significantly quicker time to fusion and lower reoperation rates than plate and screw constructs for the TN joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Short-Term Risk Factors for Subtalar Arthrodesis After Primary Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

While adjacent joint arthritis is a recognized long-term downside of primary tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA), few studies have identified risk factors for early subtalar arthrodesis (STA) after TTA. This study aims to identify the risk factors for STA within the first few years following TTA. All patients older than 18 years undergoing TTA between 2008 and 2016 were identified retrospectively. Demographic data and comorbidities were collected alongside prior operative procedures, postoperative complications, and subsequent STA. Pre-and postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade of the subtalar joint and postoperative radiographic alignment were obtained. A total of 240 patients who underwent primary TTA were included in this study with median follow up of 13.8 months. Twenty patients (8.3%) underwent STA after TTA due to symptomatic nonunion of TTA in 13 (65%), progression of symptomatic subtalar osteoarthritis (OA) in 4 (20%), and symptomatic nonunion of primary TTA combined progressively symptomatic subtalar OA in 2 (10%). Preoperative radiographic subtalar OA severity and postoperative radiographic alignment were not correlated with subsequent STA. Diabetes mellitus, Charcot arthropathy, neuropathy, alcohol use, substance use disorder, and psychiatric disease were significantly associated with having a subsequent STA. The most common postoperative contributing factor for subsequent STA following primary TTA was the salvage of symptomatic ankle nonunion rather than subtalar joint disease. Patients considering an ankle fusion should be counseled of the risk of subsequent STA, especially if they have risk factors that include diabetes, Charcot arthropathy, neuropathy, alcohol use, substance use disorder, or psychiatric disease.

Effect of Simulated Bone Resorption on the Biomechanical Performance of Intramedullary Devices for Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis

Midfoot and subtalar arthrodesis surgeries are performed to correct foot deformities and relieve arthritic pain. These procedures often employ intramedullary (IM) devices. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a sustained dynamic compression (SDC) IM device compared to mechanically static devices in withstanding the effects of simulated bone resorption. Mechanically static and SDC IM devices were implanted in simulated bone blocks (n = 5/device). Compressive loads were measured with a custom-made mechanism to simulate bone resorption. The construct bending stiffness was determined from a 4-point bend test. Resorption was simulated by cutting a 1 mm or 2 mm gap in the midpoint of each construct and repeating the loading (n = 6/device). Initial compressive loads after device insertion were greater in the SDC IM devices when compared to the static devices (p < .01). The SDC device was able to sustain compression from 2 mm to 5.5 mm of simulated resorption depending upon device length, while the static devices lost compression within 1 mm of simulated resorption regardless of implant length (p < .001). In the 4-point bend test, the SDC device maintained its bending stiffness during simulated resorption whereas the static device displayed a significant loss in bending stiffness after 1 mm of simulated resorption (p < .001). The SDC device exhibited a significantly higher bending stiffness than the static device (p < .001). The SDC IM device demonstrated superior biomechanical performance during simulated resorption compared to static devices (p < .001). In conclusion, the ability of SDC IM devices to maintain construct stability and sustain compression across the fusion site while adapting to bone resorption may lead to greater fusion rates and overall quicker times to fusion than static IM devices. Surgeons who perform midfoot and subtalar arthrodesis procedures should be aware of a device's ability to sustain compression, especially in cases where bone resorption and joint settling are prevalent postoperatively.

Subtalar Arthrodesis Union Rates With and Without Adjacent Ankle Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Subtalar arthrodesis is the surgical procedure commonly performed to treat subtalar arthritis. Subtalar arthrodesis may have a higher nonunion rate if there is a preexisting adjacent joint arthrodesis. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the subtalar arthrodesis union rate of patients with native tibiotalar joints to that of patients with prior tibiotalar arthrodesis. The secondary aim was to assess risk factors for nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients that underwent a subtalar arthrodesis in a single center between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome of union was determined based on bridging callus on radiographs and clinical symptoms. If there was uncertainty, then a nonweightbearing CT was acquired. Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney tests compared differences in demographics and risk factors for nonunion between groups. A logistical regression model was performed to determine risk factors for nonunion.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients had an adjacent ankle arthrodesis and 53 patients did not. The successful subtalar arthrodesis union rate in those with a preexisting ankle joint arthrodesis (44.4%) was approximately half that in those without an ankle joint arthrodesis (86.8%) (P < .001). On multivariate logistic regression, an adjacent ankle arthrodesis was the only significant risk factor for nonunion. The odds ratio of nonunion of the subtalar joint with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis present was 4.90 (95% CI 1.02-23.56) compared to a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle joint. In addition, 9.4% of patients without an ankle arthrodesis underwent a revision subtalar arthrodesis compared with 44.4% of those with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found that patients undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis have a significantly increased risk of nonunion compared with those undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle. Patients with a previously fused ankle need counseling about the high risk of nonunion and potential additional surgery.

Cadaveric Gait Simulation of the Effect of Subtalar Arthrodesis on Total Ankle Replacement Kinematics

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing total ankle replacement (TAR) often have symptomatic adjacent joint arthritis and deformity. Subtalar arthrodesis can effectively address a degenerative and/or malaligned hindfoot, but there is concern that it places abnormal stresses on the TAR and adjacent joints of the foot, potentially leading to early TAR failure. This study hypothesized that ankle and talonavicular joint kinematics would be altered after subtalar arthrodesis in the setting of TAR.

METHODS

Thirteen mid-tibia cadaveric specimens with neutral alignment were tested in a robotic gait simulator. To simulate gait, each specimen was secured to a static mounting fixture about a 6-degree of freedom robotic platform, and a force plate moves relative to the stationary specimen based on standardized gait parameters. Specimens were tested sequentially in TAR and TAR with subtalar arthrodesis (TAR-ST_fuse). Kinematics and range of motion of the ankle and talonavicular joint were compared between TAR and TAR-ST_fuse.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in kinematics and range of motion between TAR and TAR-ST_fuse groups. At the ankle joint, TAR-ST_fuse had less internal rotation in early-mid stance (P < .05), with decreased range of motion in the sagittal (-2.7 degrees, P = .008) and axial (-1.8 degrees, P = .002) planes in early stance, and increased range of motion in the coronal plane in middle (+1.2 degrees, P < .001) and late (+2.5 degrees, P = .012) stance. At the talonavicular joint, there were significant differences in axial and coronal kinematics in early and late stance (P < .05). Subtalar arthrodesis resulted in significantly decreased talonavicular range of motion in all planes in early and late stance (P < .003).

CONCLUSION

In ankles implanted with the TAR design used in this study, kinematics of the ankle and talonavicular joint were found to be altered after subtalar arthrodesis. Aberrant motion may reflect altered contact mechanics at the prosthesis and increased stress at the bone-implant interface, and affect the progression of adjacent joint arthritis in the talonavicular joint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may provide a correlate to clinical studies that have cited hindfoot arthrodesis as a risk factor for TAR failure.

Screws-Only Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis for Calcaneus Fractures

BACKGROUND

The management of displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) is a difficult problem with disappointing results from open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Alternatively, ORIF with primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSTA) has gained increasing popularity. The purpose of this study is to review patient-centered and radiographic outcomes of ORIF plus PSTA using only screws through a sinus tarsi approach.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent ORIF+PSTA for DIACFs was conducted. The same surgical technique was used in all cases consisting of only screws; no plates were used. Delayed surgeries past 8 weeks were excluded. Demographic and radiographic data were collected including worker's compensation claims. Plain radiographs were used to characterize injuries and review outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine DIACFs underwent PSTA with a median follow-up of 200 days (n = 69 patients). Median time to weightbearing was 57.5 days postoperatively. Ten fractures were documented as Sanders II, 36 as Sanders III, and 32 as Sanders IV. Sixty-eight fractures (86.1%) achieved fusion on radiographs at a median of 126.5 (range, 54-518) days. Thirty-nine fractures (57.3%) demonstrated radiographic fusion in all 3 predefined locations. Nine of the 14 worker's compensation patients returned to work within the period of observation. There were 8 complications: 3 requiring a secondary operation. Eleven of 79 fractures treated did not go on to achieve radiographic union.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective case series, we found that screws-only primary subtalar arthrodesis for the treatment of DIACFs through a sinus tarsi approach was associated with relatively high rates of return to work and radiographic fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Imaging and Treatment of Posttraumatic Ankle and Hindfoot Osteoarthritis

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle and hindfoot is a common and frequently debilitating disorder. 70% to 90% of ankle osteoarthritis is related to prior trauma that encompasses a spectrum of disorders including fractures and ligamentous injuries that either disrupt the articular surface or result in instability of the joint. In addition to clinical evaluation, imaging plays a substantial role in the treatment planning of posttraumatic ankle and hindfoot osteoarthritis. Imaging evaluation must be tailored to specific clinical scenarios and includes weight bearing radiography that utilizes standard and specialty views, computed tomography which can be performed with a standard or a weight bearing technique, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound evaluation. This review article aims to familiarize the reader with treatment rationale, to provide a brief review of surgical techniques and to illustrate expected imaging appearances of common operative procedures performed in the setting of posttraumatic ankle and hindfoot osteoarthritis, such as joint-preserving procedures, ankle fusion, subtalar fusion, tibiotalarcalcaneal fusion and ankle arthroplasty. Preoperative findings will be discussed along with the expected postoperative appearance of various procedures in order to improve detection of their complications on imaging and to provide optimal patient care.

Consensus on Indications for Isolated Subtalar Joint Fusion and Naviculocuneiform Fusions for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

RECOMMENDATION

Peritalar subluxation represents an important hindfoot component of progressive collapsing foot deformity, which can be associated with a breakdown of the medial longitudinal arch. It results in a complex 3-dimensional deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and pronation. Loss of peritalar stability allows the talus to rotate and translate on the calcaneal and navicular bone surfaces, typically moving medially and anteriorly, which may result in sinus tarsi and subfibular impingement. The onset of degenerative disease can manifest with stiffening of the subtalar (ST) joint and subsequent fixed and possibly arthritic deformity. While ST joint fusion may permit repositioning and stabilization of the talus on top of the calcaneus, it may not fully correct forefoot abduction and it does not correct forefoot varus. Such varus may be addressed by a talonavicular (TN) fusion or a plantar flexion osteotomy of the first ray, but, if too pronounced, it may be more effectively corrected with a naviculocuneiform (NC) fusion. The NC joint has a curvature in the sagittal plane. Thus, preserving the shape of the joint is the key to permitting plantarflexion correction by rotating the midfoot along the debrided surfaces and to fix it. Intraoperatively, care must be also taken to not overcorrect the talocalcaneal angle in the horizontal plane during the ST fusion (eg, to exceed the external rotation of the talus and inadvertently put the midfoot in a supinated position). Such overcorrection can lead to lateral column overload with persistent lateral midfoot pain and discomfort. A contraindication for an isolated ST fusion may be a rupture of posterior tibial tendon because of the resultant loss of the internal rotation force at the TN joint. In these cases, a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer is added to the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Sagittal Resection Osteotomy With Bone Block Distraction Subtalar Fusion for Treatment of Malunited Calcaneal Fractures

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of combined lateral sagittal resection osteotomy with subtalar distraction fusion in heels with painful malunion of the os calcis. This case series included 22 patients (23 feet). The mean age of the patients was 37.52 years. Sixteen (69.6%) patients were initially treated conservatively, 5 (21.7%) patients were treated surgically, and 2 (8.7%) patients were missed. The mean time lapsed before surgery was 11.43 months. A wedge of bone was resected to reduce the width of the malunited os calcis and was used as a local graft for subtalar joint fusion and to increase the height of the os calcis. The mean follow-up period was 56.83 ± 6.09 months. According to the scoring system, satisfactory results were found in 18 (82.6%) patients, and 4 (17.4%) patients had unsatisfactory results. Postoperative radiographic assessment revealed an average increase in the heel height of 7.70 ± 1.22 mm and an average decrease in heel width of 8.39 ± 1.47 mm. The average correction in the coronal axis was approximately 8.04° ± 1.26°. Complications included infection and nonunion in 3 (13%) heels. Two heels still had residual varus postoperatively, and 1 patient had injury to the sural nerve. The restoration of heel height, the reduction in heel width, and the primary fracture pattern had a significant relation with the final score. This method is a successful method for the management of subtalar arthritis caused by malunited calcaneal fractures with broadening leading to lateral abutment.

Combined Subtalar and Naviculocuneiform Fusion for Treating Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity With Medial Arch Collapse at the Level of the Naviculocuneiform Joint

BACKGROUND:

A challenge in treating acquired flatfoot deformities is the collapse of the medial arch at the level of the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. Triple fusions, being a treatment option, may lead to problems such as increased foot stiffness. We thus established a method that combines subtalar (ST) fusion with NC fusion while preserving the Chopart joint. We analyzed the radiographic correction, fusion rate, and patient satisfaction with this procedure.

METHODS:

34 feet in 31 patients (female, 23; male, 8; age 67 [45-81] years) were treated with a ST and NC joint fusion. In 15 cases, a medial sliding-osteotomy was additionally necessary to fully correct hindfoot valgus. The following radiographic parameters were measured on weightbearing radiographs preoperatively and at 2 years: talo-first metatarsal angle, talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, talonavicular coverage angle and calcaneal offset. Fusion was radiologically confirmed.

RESULTS:

All parameters, except the calcaneal pitch, showed a significant improvement. Fusion was observed after 1 year in all but 2 cases (94.1%). One nonunion each occurred at the ST and NC joint without needing any subsequent treatment. One patient developed avascular necrosis of the lateral talus with need for total ankle replacement after 1 year. All patients were satisfied with the obtained results.

CONCLUSION:

Our data suggest that a combined fusion of the ST and NC joint was effective and safe when treating adult acquired flatfoot with collapse of the medial arch at the level of the NC joint. Although the talonavicular joint was not fused, its subluxation was significantly reduced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, case series.

Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes of Subtalar Fusion for Posttraumatic Arthritis After Calcaneal Fracture

BACKGROUND

Subtalar arthrodesis is a common salvage operation for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. This study aimed to identify factors associated with functional outcomes and quality of life after subtalar fusion for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis after calcaneal fracture.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study with follow-up by questionnaire in two level 1 trauma centers. Patients who underwent subtalar arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis after a calcaneal fracture between 2001 and 2016 were identified and contacted for completion of a survey consisting of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Maryland Foot Score (MFS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System Physical Function (PROMIS PF, Short Form 10a) questionnaire, EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). Exclusion criteria were initial subtalar arthrodesis at an outside facility, primary arthrodesis for fracture, initial arthrodesis earlier than 2001, amputation of the fused foot or leg, younger than 18 years at time of fusion, and inability to communicate in English. A total of 159 patients met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-four patients completed the questionnaires, resulting in a response rate of 59%.

RESULTS

Median FAAM score was 79 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-90), median MFS was 74 (IQR, 56-86), and median PROMIS PF was 45 (IQR, 38-51). Quality of life was significantly lower when compared to a reference population ( P = .001). Smoking was independently associated with worse outcomes. Complications after fusion (such as nonunion, implant failure, and infectious complications), high-energy trauma, and ipsilateral injury were also predictors for poorer outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Acceptable functional outcomes and quality of life were observed after subtalar fusion. Smoking, complications after subtalar fusion, high-energy trauma, and presence of ipsilateral injuries were independently associated with worse functionality and quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III, comparative series.

Evaluation of Midterm Results of the Panta Nail: An Active Compression Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Device

A tibiotalocalcaneal intramedullary rod is a powerful construct often reserved for difficult and salvage cases. The Panta Nail (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, NJ) is a second-generation rod that offers active axial compression compared with previous rod designs. We characterized our experience with this device and identified factors associated with nonunion. We retrospectively identified 19 patients receiving the Panta Nail during a 4-year period with a mean follow-up period of 16 months. We used a consecutive series approach toward inclusion. Fusion, asymptomatic fibrous union, or nonunion was determined for each ankle and subtalar joint as the primary endpoint. Patients were grouped as follows: group A, successful outcome; group B, successful outcome after dynamization; group C, no successful outcome. Secondary data were tested for association with the probability of first-attempt fusion. The Panta Nail resulted in a first-attempt fusion rate of 65% at the ankle and subtalar joints. With implementation of dynamization (31% of cases) at an average of 28 weeks after insertion (groups A and B), the bony fusion rate was 88% and 77% at the ankle and subtalar joint, respectively. Inclusion of 3 asymptomatic fibrous unions with final visual analog scale scores <4 (1 ankle; 2 subtalar) as successful outcomes resulted in 94% and 88% success rates for the ankle and subtalar joints (groups A and B). Salvaged total ankle arthroplasties with the Panta Nail device as a subgroup had an 83% fusion rate, with a 50% dynamization rate. No predictors of nonunion were found. The Panta Nail is a second-generation tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis device capable of providing good success rates for fusion. Also, dynamization is an appropriate and frequent augmentation method.

Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Uncomplicated Primary Open Ankle Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing operative outcomes in straightforward, uncomplicated open ankle fusions.

METHODS

We reviewed all primary open ankle fusions conducted at 1 institution over an 11-year period to identify straightforward, uncomplicated open ankle fusions. Inclusion required a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Patients were excluded for neuropathic arthropathy, insensate limb, failed total ankle replacement, simultaneous arthrodesis of the subtalar joint, or fusions performed within 1 year of injury to salvage failed fixation and painful function due to (1) open fractures, (2) segmental bone loss greater than 1 cm, (3) infection, or (4) talar body fractures. The primary outcome variable was radiographic union at 6 months. Other operative complications were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Five hundred twenty-eight ankle fusion surgeries were performed on 440 patients at 1 institution during the study period. Two hundred fifteen surgeries met inclusion/exclusion eligibility criteria for uncomplicated open ankle fusions.

RESULTS

The overall union rate was 91%. In this cohort of uncomplicated open ankle fusions, bivariate analysis over a broad range of potential factors and further focused multivariate analysis found that nonunion was more than 3 times more likely to occur after previous subtalar fusion, and 2 times more likely to occur in patients with preoperative varus ankle alignment. The rate of reoperation was 19%, with nonunion revision as the leading reason, followed by hardware removal and incision and drainage for presumed infection. Diabetes was not a significant risk factor of either deep or superficial infection.

CONCLUSION

Open ankle fusion failed in 9% of uncomplicated ankles with arthritis. Patients who had an open ankle fusion done after previous subtalar joint fusion, as well as those who had preoperative varus ankle alignment, had a significantly higher rate of nonunion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Long-term outcome of planovalgus foot surgical correction in children with cerebral palsy

Pes planovalgus deformity results from changes in the anatomic relations among tarsal bones. Foot deformity and pain can affect the patient's ability to ambulate and are common indications for surgery. The present study was a retrospective study aimed at assessing the effectiveness and complications of subtalar fusion and calcaneal lengthening during long-term follow-up in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Pedobarographic measurements, ankle range of motion, and radiographic indexes were used to assess the outcome of surgery. The functional abilities of the patients were assessed using the gross motor functional classification system. Pain complaints were reported to evaluate potential risk factors. A total of 24 patients (43 feet) were included, with mean age at surgery of 11 ± 3.2 (range 4.7 to 18.3) years and mean follow-up duration of 10.9 ± 2.7 (range 6.3 to 15.4) years. Of the 43 feet, 15 were treated with calcaneal lengthening (mostly gross motor functional classification system level I and II) and 28 with subtalar fusion (mostly gross motor functional classification system level III and IV). Improvement was observed in both surgery groups during long-term follow-up. The need for additional surgery was observed more among patients with poor ambulation who were treated with subtalar fusion. Young patients who underwent surgery were more likely to develop foot pain. Foot pain was less common among children with poor functional abilities and patients who underwent subtalar fusion. Surgical correction of planovalgus deformity has good outcomes after both subtalar fusion and calcaneal lengthening, with maintenance of the deformity correction during long-term follow-up.

Ankle arthrodesis vs TTC arthrodesis: patient outcomes, satisfaction, and return to activity

BACKGROUND

It is believed that patients with an ankle arthrodesis (AA) have better outcomes than after a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis due to preservation of subtalar motion. However, there are no studies comparing actual functional outcomes and patient satisfaction between AA and TTC arthrodesis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patient satisfaction and functional outcomes of patients after an AA and TTC arthrodesis using a postal survey. A total of 173 patients who underwent TTC and 100 AA patients from 2002 to 2010 were identified with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. In all, 53 AA and 64 TTC arthrodesis patients were included in the study, with the remainder lost to follow-up. A return to activity questionnaire and SF-12 scores were used to compare functional outcomes. The mean follow-up time was 63 months.

RESULTS

Both groups showed good outcomes with a low visual analogue pain score (2.7 for AA and 2.8 for TTC), high satisfaction score (90.6% for AA and 87.5% for TTC), and return to work (77.4% for AA and 73.0% for TTC). In all, 84.6% of AA and 81.0% of TTC patients would have the surgery again. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for these parameters. However, when asked if their desired activity level was met, fewer AA patients met their desired level (58.5% for AA and 66.5% for TTC, P = .02). AA patients were also more likely to feel their level was unmet due to the foot and ankle (85.6% for AA vs 25.7% for TTC, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both AA and TTC arthrodesis were associated with good functional outcomes and satisfaction. AA patients had higher postoperative activity expectations and were less likely to meet them. When they failed to meet these expectations, they were much more likely to attribute it to their operated ankle. We believe it is because of the different ways the 2 groups of patients are counseled preoperatively, which highlights the importance of managing patient expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.