Plastic surgery procedure unit: A streamlined care model for minor and intermediate procedures: A cost-benefit analysis

INTRODUCTION

The advent of wide-awake local anaesthesia has led to a reduced need for main theatre for trauma and elective plastic procedures. This results in significant cost-benefits for the institution. This study aims to show how a dedicated 7 days/ week plastic surgery procedural (PSP) unit, performing both elective and trauma surgeries, can lead to significant cost-benefits for the institution.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all cases performed in the PSP unit between 1 September and 31 August 2018. We utilised hospital directory admissions data and the hospital's intranet operating theatre system to calculate hospital days saved. Cost analysis was performed using Saolta financial data.

RESULTS

A total of 3058 operations were performed. Of these operations, 2388 cases were elective and 670 were trauma cases. The average waiting time for trauma cases for main operating theatre was 1.4 days, saving a total of 487 hospital days. The total savings associated with hospital bed days were €347,861. The estimated resource savings from performing a procedure in PSP compared with main theatre with regional anaesthesia were €529.00 and €391.00 without regional anaesthesia. The cost saved due to resources was therefore €337,226. The total cost-benefit associated with performing surgeries in PSP including hospital days and resources saved was calculated as €685,087.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the benefit of performing elective and trauma operations in minor procedure units such as PSP. PSP results in a more efficient service, reducing waiting times for surgery, shorter hospital stay, reduced operating cost and an overall significant cost saving.

A cost analysis of orthopedic foot surgery: can outpatient continuous regional analgesia provide the same standard of care for postoperative pain control at home without shifting costs?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Same-day surgery is common for foot surgery. Continuous regional anesthesia for outpatients has been shown effective but the economic impact on the perioperative process-related healthcare costs remains unclear.

METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive patients were included in this assessor-blinded, prospective cohort study and allocated according to inclusion criteria in the day-care or in the in-patient group. Standardized continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed in both groups for 48 h using an elastomeric pump delivering ropivacaine 0.2 % at a rate of 5 ml/h with an additional 5 ml bolus every 60 min. Outpatients were discharged the day of surgery and followed with standardized telephone interviews. The total direct health costs of both groups were compared. Moreover, the difference in treatment costs and the difference in terms of quality of care and effectiveness between the groups were compared.

RESULTS

Total management costs were significantly reduced in the day-care group. There was no difference between the groups regarding pain at rest and with motion, persistent pain after catheter removal and the incidence of PONV. Persistent motor block and catheter inflammation/infection were comparable in both groups. There was neither a difference in the number of unscheduled ambulatory visits nor in the number of readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Day-care continuous regional analgesia leads to an overall positive impact on costs by decreasing the incidence of unplanned ambulatory visits and unscheduled readmissions, without compromising on the quality of analgesia, patients' satisfaction, and safety.

Acute Pain Management/Regional Anesthesia

Effective and efficient acute pain management strategies have the potential to improve medical outcomes, enhance patient satisfaction, and reduce costs. Pain management records are having an increasing influence on patient choice of health care providers and will affect future financial reimbursement. Dedicated acute pain and regional anesthesia services are invaluable in improving acute pain management. In addition, nonpharmacologic and alternative therapies, as well as information technology, should be viewed as complimentary to traditional pharmacologic treatments commonly used in the management of acute pain. The use of innovative technologies to improve acute pain management may be worthwhile for health care institutions.

Neuraxial anesthesia improves long-term survival after total joint replacement: a retrospective nationwide population-based study in Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

This study explored the effects of general (GA) and neuraxial (NA) anesthesia on the outcomes of primary total joint replacement (TJR) in terms of postoperative mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospital treatment costs.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2010, this nationwide population-based study retrospectively evaluated 7,977 patients in Taiwan who underwent primary total hip or knee replacement. We generated two propensity-score-matched subgroups, each containing an equal number of patients who underwent TJR with either GA or NA.

RESULTS

Of the 7,977 patients, 2,990 (37.5%) underwent GA and 4,987 (62.5%) underwent NA. Propensity-score matching was used to create comparable GA and NA groups adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, surgery type, hospital volume, and surgeon volume. Survival over the first three years following surgery was similar. The proportion of patients alive up to 14 years postoperatively for those undergoing NA was 58.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.4 to 66.0), and for those undergoing GA it was 57.3% (95% CI 51.4 to 63.2). Neuraxial anesthesia was associated with lower median [interquartile range; IQR] hospital treatment cost ($4,079 [3,805-4,444] vs $4,113 [3,812-4,568]; P < 0.001) and shorter median [IQR] LOS (8 [7-10] days vs 8 [6-10] days, respectively; P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of NA for primary TJR. The improvements in hospital costs persist even when anesthesia costs are removed. The mechanism underlying the association between NA and long-term survival is unknown.

Economics and practice management issues associated with acute pain management

The use of regional anesthesia (RA) improves cost benefit (hospital-centered) and cost utility (patient-centered) over general anesthesia with volatile agents (GAVA), based upon research in outpatient populations. To make the cost savings a reality, the authors recommend: (1) avoidance of GAVA or at least volatile agents, (2) adopting published postanesthesia care unit (PACU)-bypass criteria conducive to RA, (3) maximizing PACU-bypass rates, and (4) utilizing a block induction area. Inpatient-based acute pain services are not uniform, which makes cost analyses and comparison between practices unreliable. Additional review and commentary address surgical site infections, cancer recurrence, blood transfusions, and chronic postsurgical pain.

Making it work: setting up a regional anesthesia program that provides value

Regional anesthesia offers many benefits for the patient, surgery center, anesthesiology practice, and hospital. Unfortunately, there are no evidence-based guidelines to follow when starting a new service aimed at providing peripheral nerve blocks. A regional anesthesia program adds value by improving the quality of postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery. Specialized training in regional anesthesia is necessary when using advanced techniques, such as ultrasound guidance and continuous peripheral nerve blockade. A regional anesthesia service may shorten postanesthesia recovery time in ambulatory surgery and duration of hospital admission for some surgeries. A successful regional anesthesia service promotes effective communication among all members of the perioperative team.

Ultraschallgezielte Anästhesie peripherer Nerven

Ultrasound-guided anaesthesia of peripheral nerves is a new challenge for anaesthesiologists. The number of ultrasound users in this field has increased over the last 10 years because of improved high frequency ultrasound technology and increased mobility of machines. There have been many publications on blocking procedures but many questions still remain unanswered on the practical aspects of ultrasound-guided techniques. Basic knowledge in ultrasound technology and image characteristics and a defined approach to blocking procedures to ensure sterile working conditions are necessary to guarantee optimal safety of patients. Furthermore economic questions and the implementation of a standardised education program are very important.

[Carotid surgery in regional anesthesia--anesthesiological, neurological and surgical aspects]

Surgery of the carotid artery is justified only if it is performed with low complication rates. The essential advantages of regional anesthesia in comparison to general anesthesia are a secure neuromonitoring, hemodynamic stability and prolonged analgesia. Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery, which is described methodically in this paper, needs only a minor expenditure. Our own data show that patients with a contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery and patients with a high risk for surgery (ASA IV) are at a high risk for neurological events during carotid crossclamping. Consequences of regional anesthesia on the surgical procedure are to ignore. The question, whether economic advantages exist for regional anesthesia, cannot yet be answered.

[The value of regional and general anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery]

Adequate postoperative pain management is of major importance for a short rehabilitation time after painful orthopaedic surgery. Multimodal pathways have been established to achieve a surgical patient free of pain and complications. Peripheral and central nerve blocks are a fundamental part of these interdisciplinary strategies and are already implemented in orthopaedic surgical care. This article summarises the value of special anaesthetic techniques, especially regional anaesthesia, in orthopaedic surgery and discusses their impact on several postoperative outcome goals.

A literature review on anesthetic practice for carotid endarterectomy surgery based on cost, hemodynamic stability, and neurologic status

An extensive literature review was undertaken to evaluate the best anesthetic practice for carotid endarterectomy surgery. Two anesthetic techniques were evaluated: general anesthetic with an endotracheal tube and regional anesthetic block. Three variables were reviewed with respect to significant clinical outcomes based on anesthetic technique. Relevant literature was obtained through multiple sources that included professional journals, a professional website, and textbooks. According to the literature, there is an advantage to performing regional anesthesia with respect to cost and neurologic status. Information analyzed was inconclusive with respect to hemodynamic stability and anesthetic technique. We conclude that regional anesthesia may have some slight advantages; however, more investigation is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of local, regional and general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair using data from a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common operation in general surgery and can be performed under local, regional or general anaesthesia. This multicentre randomized trial was undertaken to compare the costs of the three anaesthetic methods in general surgical practice.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2001, 616 patients at ten hospitals who underwent primary inguinal hernia repair were randomized to local, regional or general anaesthesia. The primary endpoints were direct costs. Secondary endpoints were indirect costs and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Total intraoperative, as well as total early postoperative, data showed local anaesthesia to have significant cost advantages over regional and general anaesthesia (P < 0.001). The advantage was also significant for total hospital and total healthcare costs (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between regional and general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

The use of local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair was significantly less expensive than regional or general anaesthesia.

The addition of a regional block team to the orthopedic operating rooms does not improve anesthesia-controlled times and turnover time in the setting of long turnover times

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a regional block team with a dedicated space for performance of regional anesthetics would decrease turnover time and shorten the working day in a busy orthopedic practice with lengthy turnover times.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

927 orthopedic procedures over a three-month period.

INTERVENTIONS

The randomized placement of a regional block team to the orthopedic operating room (OR) suite.

MEASUREMENTS

We evaluated the differences in anesthesia-controlled times, first-case start times, turnover times, and OR end times using a computerized OR information system. We also surveyed the surgeons regarding their perceptions of changes in turnover time and anesthesia-controlled times during the study period. Standard descriptive statistics were computed.

RESULTS

Of a total of 927 cases, 398 cases were cared for by a regional block team and 529 cases received care in the usual manner, with the OR team providing the regional block. There was no difference between the study and control groups for on-time, first-case starts (57.73% vs 42.27%), induction time (13.2 vs 14.2 min), emergence time (8.1 vs 9.0 min), turnover time (70.3 vs 77.8 min), and OR end times. Most of the surgeons surveyed felt that the regional block team reduced turnover time significantly.

CONCLUSION

A regional block team in this environment does not reduce anesthesia-controlled times and turnover times in an orthopedic OR suite with long turnover times, and it would be virtually impossible to recover the associated extra cost. The surgeons' perspective of turnover time is inaccurate.

Ultrasound guidance in peripheral regional anesthesia: philosophy, evidence-based medicine, and techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article introduces the use of ultrasound to facilitate peripheral regional anesthesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Regional anesthesia, despite its well known clinical benefits, has not gained the popularity of general anesthesia. This is secondary to multiple shortcomings including a defined failure rate, lack of simplicity, and the potential for patient discomfort or injury. Many of the negative aspects of regional anesthesia evolve from the reality that current nerve-localization techniques are unreliable. Given the great variation in human anatomy it is not surprising that even the most veteran clinician can be challenged by techniques that demand anatomical assumptions. The recent use of ultrasound imaging for nerve localization is an innovative application of an old technology which addresses many of the shortcomings of current techniques. Specifically, ultrasound imaging allows the operator to see neural structures, guide the needle under real-time visualization, navigate away from sensitive anatomy, and monitor the spread of local anesthetic.

SUMMARY

Ultrasound technology represents an ideal mechanism by which the regional anesthesiologist can attain the safety, speed, and efficacy of general anesthesia. Ultimately, it is the correct peri-neural spread of local anesthetic around a nerve that provides safe, effective, and efficient anesthetic conditions.

Cost drivers in anesthesia: manpower, technique and other factors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the recent literature on cost drivers in anesthesia with respect to staff, techniques and drug costs, and with special focus on anesthesia workflow in the postanesthesia care unit. Moreover, the costs of post-operative pain management provided by an acute pain service are highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staff costs represent the main contributor to anesthesia costs in all studies. Therefore, many studies address the reduction of personnel costs, e.g. by using fast-tracking procedures which allow the patients to bypass the postanesthesia care unit. However, postanesthesia care unit bypassing and replacement of anesthesiologists by certified anesthesia nurses were not able to significantly decrease anesthesia costs. If anesthesiologists are reimbursed by surgically controlled time, this time is the main determinator for anesthesia costs and should be carefully monitored. Regional anesthesia techniques can help to reduce costs in the ambulatory setting because of reduced post-operative side-effects and earlier home readiness of the patients. Low gas flow and modern electroencephalographic monitoring can contribute to decreased drug-related costs. Acute pain services are mainly run by anesthesia staff thus increasing the costs in anesthesia departments. However, an acute pain service can reduce costs of surgical procedures significantly.

SUMMARY

Clear definition of the meaning of cost drivers and of criteria which allow assessment of patients' condition, and peri-operative standard operating procedures are warranted to ensure comparability of economic data in anesthesia.

[Regional anaesthesia--whether or not?]

Regional anesthesia is very popular in "Dr. Ivo Pedisić" General hospital Sisak. All the staff know the techniques, surgeons and patients accept it very well, despite still existing prejudice. The aim of the study was to explore the use of regional anesthesia during one year period, in 2003, the reasons for not performing it, as well as the prevalence of complications, also its impact on the number of patients who postoperatively required the surveillance in the intensive care unit (ICU), and finally to compare the costs of the surgery in regional vs. general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was performed very often (69%), for different operations, without any serious complication. Regional anesthesia showed good impact on the need for postoperative surveillance in the ICU that was significantly lower (p < 0.0001, Chi square test), as well as three times lower costs, realizing the savings of one modem anesthetic machine during one-year period (228.202,72 kn). The results of the study confirm all the benefits of regional anesthesia.

The efficiency of different adjunct techniques for regional anesthesia

In the present prospective, randomized controlled trial, 110 unpremedicated patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia were randomly divided into 5 groups, with 22 patients in each. During the operation, group 1 listened to a pre-recorded explanation and music, group 2 listened to a subliminal sound, group 3 received propofol by patient-controlled sedation (PCS), group 4 received intravenous midazolam, and group 5 was the control group. Patients in the midazolam group were significantly more sedated than the control group at 1 hr into the operation. The group that listened to an explanation and music were significantly less satisfied than the propofol group at the end of the operation and 30 min. postoperatively. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that if explanation and music are used instead of propofol it would save 299.53 baht per patient, but the patient satisfaction score will be 17.26 points lower than if the more expensive drug is used.

A Retrospective Comparison of Costs for Regional and General Anesthesia Techniques

In this retrospective study, we compared the costs for three different regional anesthesia techniques with the costs of general anesthesia (GA). A total of 1587 anesthesia cases which were performed for orthopedic and trauma patients over a 1-yr period in a tertiary level, university hospital setting were analyzed. The anesthesia technique-related costs were determined calculating case-specific costs for personnel, supplies, and drugs. The techniques were compared on the basis of anesthesia costs and surgical procedure duration. As a result, we found that the costs per surgical minute largely depend on the surgical procedure duration. Based on the regression function, the cost advantage of spinal anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 13% for a 50-min case, 9% for a 100-min case, and 5% for a 200-min case. The cost disadvantage of brachial plexus anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 19% for a 50-min case, 8% in a 100-min case, and 1% for a 200-min case. We found no difference in costs between epidural and GA. We concluded that cost comparisons of anesthesia techniques largely depend on the surgical duration of the cases studied. Even in a teaching hospital setting, spinal anesthesia has economic advantages over GA. Especially for short cases, brachial plexus block is more expensive in this setting.

Regional anesthesia techniques for the lower extremity

This article focuses on regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures of the lower extremity.

[Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy]

Carotid endarterectomy (CE) is among the most common vascular procedures. Recent studies have examined indications for CE and the usefulness of multiple vascular procedures, and have compared general and locoregional anesthesia. Randomized prospective trials have confirmed that the efficacy of CE exceeds 70% in patients experiencing a transient ischemic attack (TIA) with an ipsilateral stenotic carotid lesion. When both carotid surgery and coronary revascularization are indicated, CE can be performed two weeks before or concurrent with coronary artery bypass. The greatest risk in CE is of neurological complications (usually < 6%); the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is < 4%. General anesthesia is most comfortable for the patient and the surgeon. Barbiturates, opiates and isoflurane are widely employed. Cerebral monitoring involves residual pressure after clamping, although that approach is unreliable. Other forms of hemodynamic (cerebral flow with 133Xe, transcranial Doppler, jugular SvO2, conjunctival PO2) and electrical monitoring (EEG, somatosensory evoked potentials) are often unavailable, are expensive or require trained personnel. Locoregional anesthesia (cervical nerve block or cervical epidural anesthesia) can be monitored more reliably, allows therapeutic maneuvers such as carotid unclamping, placement of an intracarotid stent, increasing of arterial pressure to be carried out. Regional anesthesia decreases the incidence of intraluminal shunts. Blood pressure and heart rate are higher during cervical block than during general anesthesia, but hypertension is more common during general anesthesia. A randomized controlled trial comparing general anesthesia and cervical block found no significant differences in mortality, MI or TIA. Regional anesthesia is more cost-effective, given that less intensive care and shorter hospital stays are required.

A comparative study of general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and axillary block for outpatient hand surgery: clinical outcome and cost analysis

IV regional anesthesia can offer a more favorable patient recovery profile and shorter postoperative nursing care time and hospital discharge time than an isoflurane-based general anesthetic or brachial plexus block technique for hand surgery.

Costing anaesthetic practice. An economic comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for varicose vein and inguinal hernia surgery

A computerised database of operating theatre activity was used to estimate the costs of regional and general anaesthesia for varicose vein and inguinal hernia surgery. Data retrieved for each procedure included the anaesthetic technique and drugs used, and the duration of anaesthesia, surgery and recovery. The costs of anaesthetic drugs and disposables, salary costs of the anaesthetic personnel and maintenance costs for anaesthetic equipment were considered. Drugs and disposables accounted for approximately 25% of the total cost of an anaesthetic. Anaesthetic times were 5 min longer for regional anaesthesia, but recovery times were 10 min shorter following regional anaesthesia for varicose vein surgery. Staff costs were dependent on the length of time each staff member spent with the patient. Although the number of cases was small, provision of a field block and sedation for inguinal hernia repair was considerably cheaper than other anaesthetic techniques.

A cost analysis: general endotracheal versus regional versus monitored anesthesia care

A prospective study was conducted to compare the total cost of all consumable products used to perform a general endotracheal anesthetic (GETA), a regional anesthetic, and a monitored anesthetic (MAC). For 1 month, providers completed a survey for each anesthetic rendered identifying type and quantity of consumables used. The mean cost of each type of anesthetic was identified. Analysis of variance was conducted using SPSS (version 7.5.1) to compare the mean costs of the three groups. Of 936 anesthetics performed, 536 surveys were returned (57%). The breakdown by type was GETA, 60% (N = 319); regional, 35% (N = 189); and MAC, 5% (N = 28). The mean cost per case type was GETA, $61.74; regional, $34.99; and MAC, $26.27. The cost of rendering a GETA was significantly greater (p < 0.0005) than that of either regional or MAC. Clinical practice guidelines were established to address areas in which cost savings could be realized and were provided to all anesthesia practitioners to assist in providing the safest and most cost-effective method of rendering an anesthetic.

Benchmarking the perioperative process: II. Introducing anesthesia clinical pathways to improve processes and outcomes and to reduce nursing labor intensity in ambulatory orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

(1) To introduce anesthesia clinical pathways as a management tool to improve the quality of care; (2) to use the Procedural Times Glossary published by the Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors (AACD) as a template for data collection and analysis; and (3) to determine the effects of anesthesia clinical pathways on surgical processes, outcomes, and costs in common ambulatory orthopedic surgery.

DESIGN

Hospital database and patient chart review of consecutive patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during academic years (AY) 1995-1996 and 1996-1997. Patient data from AY 1995-1996, during which no intraoperative anesthesia clinical pathways existed, served as historical controls. Data from AY 1996-1997, during which intraoperative anesthesia clinical pathways were used, served as the treatment group. Regional anesthesia options were routinely offered to patients in the clinical pathway.

SETTING

Ambulatory surgery center in a teaching hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The records of 503 ASA physical status I and II patients were reviewed. 1996-1997 patients underwent clinical pathway anesthesia care in which the intraoperative and postoperative anesthesia process was standardized with respect to symptom management, drugs, and equipment used. 1995-1996 patients did not have a standardized intraoperative and postoperative anesthetic course with respect to the management of common symptoms or to specific drugs and supplies used. Intervals described in the AACD Procedural Times Glossary, anesthesia drug and supply costs, and patient outcome variables (postoperative nursing interventions required and unexpected admissions), as influenced by the use of the anesthesia clinical pathway, were measured. Clinical pathway anesthesia care of ACLR in 1996-1997, which actively incorporated regional anesthesia options, reduced pharmacy and materials cost variability; slightly increased turnover time; improved intraoperative anesthesia and surgical efficiency, recovery times, and unexpected admission rates; and decreased the number of required nursing interventions for common postoperative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical pathway patient management systems in anesthesia care are likely to produce useful outcome data of current practice patterns when compared with historical controls. This management tool may be useful in simultaneously containing costs and improving process efficiency and patient outcomes.

Benchmarking the perioperative process: III. Effects of regional anesthesia clinical pathway techniques on process efficiency and recovery profiles in ambulatory orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

(1) To incorporate regional anesthesia options for common outpatient orthopedic surgery into clinical pathways; (2) to use the clinical pathway format and the Procedural Times Glossary published by the Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors (AACD) as management tools to measure postoperative same-day surgery processes and discharge outcomes; and (3) to determine the effects of general, regional, and combined general-regional anesthesia on these processes and outcomes.

DESIGN

Hospital database and patient chart review of consecutive patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during academic years (AY) 1995-1996 and 1996-1997. Patient data from AY 1995-1996, during which no intraoperative anesthesia clinical pathway existed, served as historical controls. Data from AY 1996-1997, during which intraoperative anesthesia clinical pathways were used, served as the treatment group.

SETTING

Ambulatory surgery center in a teaching hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The records of 503 ASA physical status I and II patients were reviewed. 1996-1997 patients selected general anesthesia (+/- femoral nerve block) or epidural anesthesia, after which the remainder of the perioperative anesthesia process was standardized with respect to the drugs and equipment used. 1995-1996 patients did not necessarily have a choice in anesthesia technique and did not have a standardized perioperative anesthetic course with respect to specific drugs and supplies. Intervals described in the AACD Procedural Times Glossary, anesthesia drug and supply costs, and patient outcome variables (postoperative nursing interventions required and unexpected admissions), as influenced by anesthesia technique used, were measured. Combined general-regional anesthesia care for ACLR in 1996-1997, when compared with general anesthesia alone, led to increased pharmacy and materials costs and increased turnover time. However, patients with the combined technique showed improved recovery profiles and lower unexpected admission rates, and they required fewer nursing interventions for common postoperative symptoms. Patients receiving epidural anesthesia showed discharge outcomes similar to those patients receiving general anesthesia with femoral nerve block. Postanesthesia care unit bypass (fast-tracking) was more likely in clinical pathway regional anesthesia patients, when compared with the clinical pathway general anesthesia used.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical pathway regional anesthesia care for outpatient orthopedics may have a significant role in simultaneously containing costs and improving both process efficiency and patient outcomes.

How to reduce the cost of hindfoot fusion

The purpose of this study was to determine whether modification of a surgical practice by using regional anesthesia and local bone grafting would yield the same surgical results as traditional anesthesia and iliac crest bone graft, with a cost reduction. All patients were matched by preoperative disease and were assessed to determine satisfaction and complications. The length of stay for the seven matched pairs of patients undergoing subtalar arthrodesis decreased significantly, as did blood loss, total operating room time, and tourniquet time. The average cost saving was $7844. Similar data were found for the nine matched pairs of patients who underwent triple arthrodesis, blood loss, and tourniquet time. Total cost was again found to be significantly lower by an average of $9302 in the study group. The most dramatic changes between the two groups were demonstrated in the patients who underwent ankle fusions. The 10 matched pairs showed a marked reduction in length of stay, with a decrease in estimated blood loss from 260 mL to 92 mL (P < 0.05). The total operating room time and tourniquet time in these two groups were similar. There was a cost savings in the study group of $9888, with no increase in complications. The use of longacting regional anesthesia and local bone grafting enabled surgeons to perform hindfoot arthrodeses on an outpatient basis, with a significant reduction in cost to the patient and no increase in complications.

Anaesthesia for the management of distal radius fractures in adults in Scottish hospitals

The objective of this study was to determine the methods of anaesthesia used for the reduction of distal radius fractures in adults in Scotland and to compare this with the UK situation. The method used was a telephone questionnaire of accident and emergency doctors in 25 Scottish hospitals dealing with trauma. Thirty-two per cent still use general anaesthesia routinely for these procedures despite its cost, complexity and need for admission in the majority of cases. Forty-four per cent now use the Bier's block technique of regional anaesthesia, with the attendant advantages of ease of use, rapid recovery and no need for admission in the majority of patients. Twelve per cent use intravenous sedation and 12% use haematoma blocks for manipulations. It is concluded that Bier's block may be the anaesthetic method of choice for the management of distal radius fractures both in efficiency and economic terms in Scotland. However, training for Bier's blocks needs to be standardized and improved.

The efficacy of regional anesthesia for outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopaedic procedure. Until recently, the majority of these procedures have been performed on an impatient basis. This retrospective study evaluated 67 consecutive patients who underwent an arthroscopically assisted, autogenous bone-patellar ligament-bone ACL reconstruction that was supervised by the same surgeon. General endotracheal anesthesia was used for 36 patients and a femoral sciatic nerve block was used in 31 patients. Only patients who underwent either isolated ACL reconstructions, or those combined with either medial or lateral meniscectomies, were included. No statistically significant differences in either the mean anesthesia time or operative time existed between the general anesthesia and regional anesthesia groups. Patients receiving regional anesthesia did require a significantly longer recovery room stay than those who received general anesthesia. Most of the patients who received general anesthesia had inpatient procedures. In the general anesthesia group, 31 of 36 patients spent at least one night in the hospital. Three of 30 patients who received regional anesthesia required hospital admission. There were no differences between anesthesia-related complication between groups. The cost saving of performing ACL reconstructions under regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia was calculated to be $2,907 per case and predominantly reflected the outpatient approach used in these cases. This study supports the use of femoral sciatic nerve block anesthesia as a safe and reliable alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing outpatient ACL reconstruction. The use of this technique was not found to compromise operating room efficiency. Patients receiving regional anesthesia did require a slightly longer recovery room stay. ACL reconstruction performed under regional anesthesia with same-day discharge was well tolerated by our patients and it provides a cost-efficient alternative to ACL reconstructions performed as inpatient procedures.

Safe and cost-effective approach to carotid surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and cost effectiveness of carotid surgery performed altering the perioperative protocol in an attempt to decrease resource utilisation.

SETTING

Department of vascular surgery in a large metropolitan teaching hospital in northern Italy.

DESIGN

Prospective, non-selective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and eighty carotid procedures were performed in 1995 on 343 patients (274 males, 69 females, mean age 68.2 years, range 47-86 years). The most important cost containment measures, were: (i) limiting the use of contrast arteriography to cases of dubious ultrasonographic diagnosis; (ii) routine use of loco-regional anaesthesia; (iii) postoperative admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) only in selected cases; (iv) early postoperative discharge where possible.

RESULTS

Mortality was 0.26% and neurological morbidity 1.58%. General anaesthesia was required in eight patients (2.1%), and only seven patients (1.8%) were admitted postoperatively to the ICU. Arteriography was performed in 56 cases (14.7%). The average hospital stay was 5 days with a global cost of 43,036 ECU, as compared with a cost of 6764 ECU for patients treated traditionally with routine arteriography, general anaesthesia and routine ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective use of arteriography and ICU, routine use of loco-regional anaesthesia and reduced hospital stay make it possible to lower the cost of carotid surgery without sacrificing quality.

Local anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy: a comparison of efficacy and cost

This study was performed to compare the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of general, regional, and local anesthesia when performing outpatient knee arthroscopy. The study consisted of two portions. A retrospective review of 256 outpatient knee arthroscopies was performed. The types of anesthesia used were general endotracheal, regional (epidural or spinal), and local. Comparisons were made between operative procedure, anesthesia procedure time, need for supplemental anesthesia, recovery room time and cost, pharmaceutical cost, and complications. A prospective study consisted of 100 consecutive outpatient knee arthroscopies performed using local anesthesia. Data identical to the retrospective portion were obtained. Visual analog scales were used in a patient questionnaire completed at the first postoperative visit to assess patient satisfaction with local anesthesia. The retrospective data showed similar demographics and operative procedures performed in the three study groups. The difference between operative time and total anesthetic time for the local group was 35 minutes less than for regional, and 23 minutes less than for the general group. These differences were statistically significant (P < or = .05). Total pharmaceutical cost was significantly less for the local group (P < or = .05). Recovery room cost for the local anesthesia group averaged $134 compared with $450 for regional and $527 for general. This difference was significant (P < or = .05). There were 19 complications with general anesthesia, 16 with regional anesthesia, and 2 with local. There were two regional and two local cases that needed subsequent general anesthesia. The prospective data showed nearly identical time and cost data. The patient questionnaire showed nearly universal acceptance and satisfaction with the use of local anesthesia. The use of local anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy is safe, effective, and well accepted. The use of local anesthesia was shown to save a minimum of $400 per case compared with the other anesthetic methods studied.

[Cost effectiveness of local regional anesthesia in a remote area]

Loco-regional anesthesia techniques are considered as a simple and economic solution to problems posed by anesthesia in developing countries. However the cost benefits of some techniques are reduced by cardiovascular effects that affect the quantity and nature of peroperative vascular filling usually necessary during general anesthesia. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the relative costs of these methods by comparing the quantity of crystalloid solution and blood administered during loco-regional anesthesias and general anesthesias in a general hospital center in Africa. In a retrospective cohort of 1050 consecutive patients operated on in the Surgery and Gynecology/Obstetrics Departments of the A. Sice Hospital in Pointe Noire (Congo), 495 included in a study comparing perimedullary anesthesia and general anesthesia. The total volume of solution and blood administered to the patients during the procedure was studied in function of the type of anesthesia and surgery performed. Results showed that the amount of crystalloid solution administered during peridural and spinal anesthesia tended to be higher. This difference was significant only for prostate surgery. Use of epidural anesthesia did not increase the quantity of fluid modified gelatin and blood transfused in this series. It was also observed that 55% of patients who underwent peridural anesthesia required further intravenous anesthesia as opposed to 18.8% of patients who underwent spinal anesthesia. These findings indicate that loco-regional anesthesia performed under standardized conditions does not significantly change the quantity and nature of preoperative filling usually necessary during general anesthesia. Thus these techniques can be considered as cost-effective in developing countries even though the long period necessary for practitioners to learn them results in a transient increase in cost. A prospective study by surgical groups with experience using loco-regional anesthesia is needed to confirm this study.

A tide of change in the management of an old fracture?

Colles' fractures are manipulated under a variety of anaesthetic techniques. An increasing awareness of cost and time within the National Health Service contributes to a marked change in the anaesthetic management of Colles' fractures. This paper presents the results of a survey of the anaesthetic techniques used in the larger accident and emergency (A&E) departments of the UK, and demonstrates the increasing popularity of the haematoma block compared with 5 years ago (7% in 1989 vs. 33% in 1994), at the expense of the general anesthetic (44% in 1989 vs 24% in 1994). The popularity of the Bier's block has remained unchanged (33% in 1989 and 1994). Local and regional anaesthetic techniques can be safely performed by A&E doctors, with appropriate monitoring, and this has beneficial resource implications for the anaesthetic department and the hospital.

Short-stay carotid endarterectomy is safe and cost-effective

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conventionally performed following a contrast arteriogram, under general anesthesia, and with postoperative admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated whether any of these traditional adjuncts to CEA is necessary.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients had CEA performed according to a protocol of duplex scanning only, operation under regional anesthesia, and admission to the ICU only in cases of a proven need for services unique to the ICU (group I). Utilization of preoperative arteriography, admission to the ICU, postoperative complications, total hospital length of stay, and hospital charges were calculated for this group and results were compared with a group of 178 patients undergoing conventional CEA (arteriography, general anesthesia, routine ICU admission) during the same period (group II).

RESULTS

In group I, 1 patient (6%) underwent preoperative arteriography and 4 patients (22%) were admitted to the ICU after CEA. Most group II patients (114 of 178, or 64%) underwent preoperative arteriography and virtually all (175 of 178, or 98%) were admitted to the ICU. Compared with group II, the average hospital length of stay for group I was significantly shorter (1.3 +/- 0.1 versus 3.1 +/- 0.3 days, P = 0.03) and hospital charges were significantly reduced ($5,861 +/- 229 versus $11,140 +/- 729, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that CEA can be safely performed without routine preoperative carotid arteriography; that routine ICU admission is unnecessary for the majority of cases; and that elimination of routine arteriography and ICU admission can reduce hospital charges for CEA by nearly one half.

[Arguments against conduction anesthesia in children]

Regional anaesthesia has been increasingly popular in paediatric patients of all ages, especially because some techniques afford excellent per and post-operative pain relief. However, side effects may occur. Particularly, systemic toxicity from bupivacaine administration is associated with intravascular injection or overdosage. Then, we focused anaesthesiologist's attention on some inconvenients related with these practices. Regional blockade is most of the time performed in conjunction with general anaesthesia. Consequently, these procedures need additional time, material and nurses. There are relatively few absolute indications for regional anaesthesia in children. The decision for using these techniques is influenced by several factors as incidence of complications, local technical expertise. Alternative methods to provide per and post-operative analgesia being available, advantages and side effects of loco-regional anaesthesia have to be opposited. Management of the best method of block, doses and local anaesthetics or adjuvants according age, requires likely specific teaching in training team. An effort to provide appropriate guidelines and training to ward nurses is necessary to improve security when regional blockade is used for postoperative analgesia. In every cases, physician's experience is the best argument of choice.

Cost effectiveness of regional anesthesia in carotid endarterectomy

The purpose of this prospective study was to assess safety, efficacy, and hospital costs (excluding medications) and laboratory tests related to general (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). One hundred patients underwent CEA; 50 received GA and 50 received RA. Thirty-eight men (eight diabetic) and 12 women (two diabetic), with an average age of 62.4 (47 to 79) years comprised the GA group; 35 men (six diabetic) and 15 women (one diabetic), with an average age of 64.1 (51 to 74) years comprised the RA group. Twenty-one patients (17 men, 4 women) in the GA and 24 patients (19 men, 5 women) in the RA group had hypertension. Every patient had some stigmata of cardiac disease. Patients receiving GA for CEA spent an average of 1.2 days in the surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and 6.1 days in a regular hospital bed, for an average cost of $4547. The patients who underwent CEA under RA had an average of 0.1 ICU days and 4.1 regular hospital days, for a cost of $2067. RA saved $2480 per patient and $124,000 in our study group, with no increase in mortality or morbidity rates (P less than 0.001). RA is superior to GA in cost-effectiveness for patients undergoing CEA.