Weight-based vs fixed dosing of darbepoetin alfa for anemia following kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

Post-transplantation anemia (PTA) is common in kidney transplant recipients, with patients frequently treated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents such as darbepoetin alfa. The optimal dosing for darbepoetin alfa remains controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involved kidney transplant recipients who received darbepoetin alfa at 2 clinics. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those who received a fixed dose of 200 μg and those who received a weight-based dose of 0.45 μg/kg. The dosing interval varied depending on clinical response, clinic visit timing, and frequency allowed by insurance. The primary outcome was achieving a hemoglobin concentration of at least 10 g/dL without blood transfusion by 12 weeks after darbepoetin alfa initiation.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients in the study, 45% received weight-based dosing and 55% received fixed dosing. Darbepoetin alfa was initiated significantly earlier after transplantation in the fixed-dose group (median of 14 vs 20 days; P = 0.003). The weight-based group received more doses of darbepoetin alfa (median of 4 vs 2 doses; P = 0.002) and had a significantly lower cumulative exposure to darbepoetin alfa (125 vs 590 μg; P < 0.001). The median time between doses was 9 days (interquartile range, 7-14 days) in the weight-based group and 12 days (7-32 days) in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.04). Patients in the weight-based group more frequently achieved the primary outcome (67.3% vs 47.5%; P = 0.059). There was no significant difference in secondary or safety outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Weight-based and fixed dosing approaches for darbepoetin alfa were not different in the achievement of a hemoglobin concentration of at least 10 g/dL without blood transfusion at 12 weeks after darbepoetin alfa initiation, with significantly lower cumulative darbepoetin alfa utilization in the weight-based group. Weight-based dosing of darbepoetin alfa in PTA appears to be safe and effective, with the potential for significant patient and health-system cost savings.

Epoetin-alfa induced pruritic maculopapular eruption: Case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are commonly used in clinical practice to improve anaemia. Despite a number of patients successfully treated without adverse events, the complications have been previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

To report and review the characteristics and management of ESA hypersensitivities.

METHODS

Case reports and related articles associated with ESA use, published between January 1999 and December 2018, were retrieved through Electronic databases (MEDLINE® and PubMed®).

RESULTS

Forty-seven ESA patients with various immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions caused by epoetin and pharmaceutical excipients were identified from nineteen studies and one case report in this paper. Fatal hypersensitivity to ESA and ESA-allergic cross-reactivities have been documented. Desensitization or change of EPO molecular structure has been reported as successful methods of re-introducing the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

ESA hypersensitivity in the various allergic reactions and cross-reactivity have been documented. Desensitization and Epoetin structural changes could be successful methods to re-introduce the drug.

Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials

BACKGROUND

The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs darbepoetin in patients with anaemia of CKD. This concern was not observed in dialysis patients in ASCEND-D (NCT02879305).

METHODS

ASCEND-ND randomized 3872 patients to daprodustat or darbepoetin. ASCEND-D randomized 2964 patients to daprodustat or conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). In both studies ESA comparators used different dosing intervals (3/week, 1/week, every 2 or every 4 weeks). The prespecified on-treatment approach examined relative risks for cancer AEs up to the last dose date + 1 day. In these analyses, owing to different dosing intervals between arms, Cox models were used to estimate the daprodustat effect by various follow-up periods (censoring at last dose date, last dose date + dosing intervals, or end of study).

RESULTS

In ASCEND-ND, the safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin on cancer-related AEs depended on the duration of follow-up after last dose date: hazard ratio (HR) 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.40] at end of study [HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.81, 1.56) for last dose date + dosing interval; HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.04, 2.15) for last dose date + 1 day]. In ASCEND-D, no excess risk of cancer-related AEs was observed with any model examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Prespecified on-treatment analyses for cancer-related AEs appeared to result in biased risk estimates in ASCEND-ND by preferentially under-counting events from patients assigned to darbepoetin. Analyses accounting for longer darbepoetin dosing intervals, or extending follow-up, resulted in attenuation of effect estimates towards neutrality, similar to ASCEND-D, where ESA comparator dosing intervals are closer to daprodustat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The ASCEND-ND trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02876835); the ASCEND-D trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02879305).

Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Not Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Daprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not undergoing dialysis, the efficacy and safety of daprodustat, as compared with the conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent darbepoetin alfa, are unknown.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial with blinded adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes, we compared daprodustat with darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD who were not undergoing dialysis. The primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke).

RESULTS

Overall, 3872 patients were randomly assigned to receive daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin levels were similar in the two groups. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.74±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.66±0.02 g per deciliter in the darbepoetin alfa group (difference, 0.08 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.13), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, a first MACE occurred in 378 of 1937 patients (19.5%) in the daprodustat group and in 371 of 1935 patients (19.2%) in the darbepoetin alfa group (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.19), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25. The percentages of patients with adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD and anemia who were not undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and with respect to cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-ND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02876835.).

Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25.

RESULTS

A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).

Vadadustat in Patients with Anemia and Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD

BACKGROUND

Vadadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, a class of drugs that stabilize HIF and stimulate erythropoietin and red-cell production.

METHODS

In two phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority trials, we compared vadadustat with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) darbepoetin alfa in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) not previously treated with an ESA who had a hemoglobin concentration of less than 10 g per deciliter and in patients with ESA-treated NDD-CKD and a hemoglobin concentration of 8 to 11 g per deciliter (in the United States) or 9 to 12 g per deciliter (in other countries). The primary safety end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), pooled across the two trials. Secondary safety end points included expanded MACE (MACE plus hospitalization for either heart failure or a thromboembolic event). The primary and key secondary efficacy end points in each trial were the mean change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline during two evaluation periods: weeks 24 through 36 and weeks 40 through 52.

RESULTS

A total of 1751 patients with ESA-untreated NDD-CKD and 1725 with ESA-treated NDD-CKD underwent randomization in the two trials. In the pooled analysis, in which 1739 patients received vadadustat and 1732 received darbepoetin alfa, the hazard ratio for MACE was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.36), which did not meet the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25. The mean between-group differences in the change in the hemoglobin concentration at weeks 24 through 36 were 0.05 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.15) in the trial involving ESA-untreated patients and -0.01 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.07) in the trial involving ESA-treated patients, which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter.

CONCLUSIONS

Vadadustat, as compared with darbepoetin alfa, met the prespecified noninferiority criterion for hematologic efficacy but not the prespecified noninferiority criterion for cardiovascular safety in patients with NDD-CKD. (Funded by Akebia Therapeutics and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; PRO₂TECT ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02648347 and NCT02680574.).

Safety and Efficacy of Vadadustat for Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Vadadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, a class of compounds that stimulate endogenous erythropoietin production.

METHODS

We conducted two randomized, open-label, noninferiority phase 3 trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vadadustat, as compared with darbepoetin alfa, in patients with anemia and incident or prevalent dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD). The primary safety end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of death from any cause, a nonfatal myocardial infarction, or a nonfatal stroke), pooled across the trials (noninferiority margin, 1.25). A key secondary safety end point was the first occurrence of a MACE plus hospitalization for either heart failure or a thromboembolic event. The primary and key secondary efficacy end points were the mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to weeks 24 to 36 and from baseline to weeks 40 to 52, respectively, in each trial (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter).

RESULTS

A total of 3923 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa: 369 in the incident DD-CKD trial and 3554 in the prevalent DD-CKD trial. In the pooled analysis, a first MACE occurred in 355 patients (18.2%) in the vadadustat group and in 377 patients (19.3%) in the darbepoetin alfa group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.11). The mean differences between the groups in the change in hemoglobin concentration were -0.31 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.10) at weeks 24 to 36 and -0.07 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.19) at weeks 40 to 52 in the incident DD-CKD trial and -0.17 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.23 to -0.10) and -0.18 g per deciliter (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.12), respectively, in the prevalent DD-CKD trial. The incidence of serious adverse events in the vadadustat group was 49.7% in the incident DD-CKD trial and 55.0% in the prevalent DD-CKD trial, and the incidences in the darbepoetin alfa group were 56.5% and 58.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with anemia and CKD who were undergoing dialysis, vadadustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to cardiovascular safety and correction and maintenance of hemoglobin concentrations. (Funded by Akebia Therapeutics and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; INNO₂VATE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02865850 and NCT02892149.).

Changes in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent Use Under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program

INTRODUCTION

Risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs are intended to improve safe use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. However, controversy exists over whether they consistently accomplish this goal.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess how initiation of the erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa changed following implementation and enforcement (following a 1-year post-implementation grace period) of a prominent REMS program warning physicians against use in cancer patients with hemoglobin above 10 g/dL.

METHODS

Using claims data from a large US commercial insurance company, we conducted interrupted time-series analyses of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa initiation among adult cancer patients in the 12 months before REMS program implementation, after REMS program implementation, and after REMS program enforcement. We also evaluated differences in inappropriate initiation (hemoglobin tests all above 10 g/dL in the prior month) between the periods.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 3456 darbepoetin alfa initiators and 2632 epoetin alfa initiators. Over the study period, the monthly number of initiators per 100,000 patients with cancer fell from 119 to 32 for darbepoetin alfa and from 82 to 34 for epoetin alfa. However, non-significant post-REMS program implementation level and slope changes per 100,000 adult patients with cancer were observed for darbepoetin alfa (level 0.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) -14.98 to 15.05]; slope 1.94 [95% CI -0.22 to 4.10]) and epoetin alfa (level -4.10 [95% CI -16.85 to 8.65]; slope -0.52 [95% CI -2.35 to 1.32]). Non-significant post-REMS program enforcement level and slope changes were also seen for both drugs (darbepoetin alfa level 1.58 [95% CI -0.58 to 3.74, slope -0.28 [95% CI -15.29 to 14.73]; epoetin alfa level 1.58 (95% CI -0.26 to 3.42], slope 5.74 [95% CI -7.01 to 18.49]). Finally, non-significant changes in inappropriate darbepoetin alfa (60% vs. 53% vs. 57%, p = 0.68) and epoetin alfa (53% vs. 53% vs. 46%, p = 0.41) initiation were observed between the three study periods.

CONCLUSION

REMS program implementation and enforcement were not associated with significant changes in ESA initiation, adding to concerns over the degree to which certain REMS programs enhance patient safety.

Efficacy and safety of CKD-11101 (darbepoetin-alfa proposed biosimilar) compared with NESP in anaemic chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKD-11101 (biosimilar darbepoetin-alfa, Chong Kun Dang Pharm.) compared with NESP® in treatment of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03431623.

METHOD

In this multi-centre, randomized, double-blind study, patients were treated with CKD-11101 and NESP. The efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was 24 weeks, during which patients were treated every 2 weeks. All patients who completed the EEP were treated with CKD-11101 every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks and every 4 weeks for the safety evaluation period (SEP), which was from 24 weeks to 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean haemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to end of EEP and mean dose needed to achieve the target Hb.

RESULTS

The mean Hb level was increased in both groups during the EEP (both p < 0.001). The difference in mean Hb level change between the two groups was 0.01 g/dL (95% CI = -0.213-0.242), indicating that CKD-11101 was equivalent to NESP. The difference in mean administration dose between groups was -1.40 mcg (95% CI = -6.859-4.059) included in the equivalent range. The incidence of AEs and ADRs was not different between the two groups, and the frequency of ADRs was favourable in both groups (1.2% in CKD-11101 vs 7.7% in the NESP to CKD-11101 conversion group).

CONCLUSION

CKD-11101 has an equivalent therapeutic effect as NESP in chronic kidney disease patients with renal anaemia. CKD-11101 can be safely used for long-term treatment and in patients converted from NESP.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Molidustat for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: DIALOGUE Extension Studies

BACKGROUND

Molidustat, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The efficacy and safety of molidustat were recently evaluated in three 16-week phase 2b studies. Here, we report the results of two long-term extension studies of molidustat.

METHODS

Both studies were parallel-group, open-label, multicenter studies of ≤36 months' duration, in patients with anemia due to CKD, and included an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as active control. One study enrolled patients not receiving dialysis (n = 164), and the other enrolled patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 88). The primary efficacy variable for both studies was change in blood hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to each post-baseline visit, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In patients not on dialysis, the mean ± SD Hb concentrations at baseline were 11.28 ± 0.55 g/dL for molidustat and 11.08 ± 0.51 g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations throughout the study (defined as mean of each patient's overall study Hb levels) were 11.10 ± 0.508 and 10.98 ± 0.571 g/dL in patients treated with molidustat and darbepoetin, respectively. Similar proportions of patients reported at least one AE in the molidustat (85.6%) and darbepoetin (85.7%) groups. In patients on dialysis, mean ± SD Hb levels at baseline were 10.40 ± 0.70 and 10.52 ± 0.53 g/dL in the molidustat and epoetin groups, respectively. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations during the study were 10.37 ± 0.56 g/dL in the molidustat group and 10.52 ± 0.47 g/dL in the epoetin group. Proportions of patients who reported at least one AE were 91.2% in the molidustat group and 93.3% in the epoetin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Molidustat was well tolerated for up to 36 months and appears to be an effective alternative to darbepoetin and epoetin in the long-term management of anemia associated with CKD.

Safety and effectiveness of long-term use of darbepoetin alfa in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease: a post-marketing surveillance study in Japan

Background

This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of long-term darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin) for the treatment of renal anemia in Japanese non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.

Methods

Patients were treated with darbepoetin and followed up for 3 years. Adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and renal function were assessed. Patients were stratified by Hb level at the time of occurrence of cardiovascular-related AEs. Statistical analyses were performed to explore factors affecting the occurrence of AEs, cardiovascular-related AEs, and composite renal endpoints.

Results

In the safety analysis set (5547 patients), AEs and ADRs occurred in 44.4 and 7.1% of patients, respectively. Cardiovascular-related AEs were observed in 12.6% of the overall population. The proportion of patients who presented cardiovascular-related AEs was lower among those with a higher Hb level at the time of occurrence. In the effectiveness analysis set (5024 patients), mean Hb levels remained between 10.0 and 10.6 g/dL (Weeks 4–156). Three months after darbepoetin administration, patients with Hb ≥ 11 g/dL presented fewer composite renal endpoints than those with Hb < 11 g/dL (p = 0.0013), and the cumulative proportion of renal survival was higher in those with Hb ≥ 11 g/dL vs. Hb < 11 g/dL (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

This PMS study showed the safety and effectiveness of long-term use of darbepoetin in a large number of patients. Patients with Hb ≥ 11 g/dL presented fewer composite renal endpoints than those with Hb < 11 g/dL, without an increase in the incidence of cardiovascular-related AEs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10157-018-1632-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA) for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA) is a newer, longer acting ESA which might be preferred to other ESAs (epoetin or darbepoetin) based on its lower frequency of administration. Different dosing requirements and molecular characteristics of CERA compared with other ESAs may lead to different health outcomes (mortality, cardiovascular events, quality of life) in people with anaemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess benefits and harms of CERA compared with other epoetins (darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa or beta) or placebo/no treatment or CERA with differing strategy of administration for anaemia in individuals with CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 13 June 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration, comparing CERA with a different ESA (darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa or beta) or placebo or standard care or versus CERA with different strategies for administration in people with any stage of CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent investigators. We summarised patient-centred outcomes (all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, red cell blood transfusion, iron therapy, cancer, hypertension, seizures, dialysis vascular access thrombosis, drug injection-related events, hyperkalaemia and health-related quality of life and haemoglobin levels) using random effects meta-analysis. Treatment estimates were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardized mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 studies involving 5410 adults with CKD. Seven studies (1273 participants) involved people not requiring dialysis, 19 studies (4209 participants) involved people treated with dialysis and one study (71 participants) evaluated treatment in recipients of a kidney transplant. Treatment was given for 24 weeks on average. No data were available for children with CKD. Studies were generally at high or unclear risk of bias from allocation concealment and blinding of outcomes. Only two studies masked participants and investigators to treatment allocation. One study compared CERA with placebo, nine studies CERA with epoetin alfa or beta, nine studies CERA with darbepoetin alfa, and two studies compared CERA with epoetin alfa or beta and darbepoetin alfa. Three studies assessed the effects of differing frequencies of CERA administration and five assessed differing CERA doses.There was low certainty evidence that CERA had little or no effects on mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.57; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.65), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 5.09, 95% CI 0.25 to 105.23; RR 5.56, 95% CI 0.99 to 31.30), hypertension (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.28), need for blood transfusion (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.46; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.61), or additional iron therapy (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03) compared to epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa respectively. There was insufficient evidence to compare the effect of CERA to placebo on clinical outcomes. Only one low quality study reported that CERA compared to placebo might lead to little or no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.31 to 28.18) and hypertension ((RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52). There was low certainty evidence that different doses (higher versus lower) or frequency (twice versus once monthly) of CERA administration had little or no different effect on all-cause mortality (RR 3.95, 95% CI 0.17 to 91.61; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.66), hypertension (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.52; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.21), and blood cell transfusions (RR 4.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 19.53; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.62). No studies reported comparative treatment effects of different ESAs on health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low certainty evidence that CERA has little or no effects on patient-centred outcomes compared with placebo, epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa for adults with CKD. The effects of CERA among children who have CKD have not studied in RCTs.

Variables affecting darbepoetin resistance index in hemodialysis patients

Erythropoietin resistance index calculation has been used as a tool to evaluate anemia response to erythropoietin therapy. Very little has been reported in its use when using darbepoetin and factors influencing in Arab patients. Darbepoetin resistance index (DRI) was calculated in all our patients using darbepoetin. This was correlated to demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. Of the 250 patients, 40.4% were diabetic, 71.1% on hemodialysis, and 28.6% on hemodiafiltration), 23.9% with PermCaths (PC), and 76.1 % with arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The mean DRI was 10.96 ± 12.9 I. Females had 45% higher DRI than males (P = 0.005), and patients with PC had a 66% higher DRI than those with AVF (P = 0.029). Patients with Vitamin D level below the 50th percentile had 55.9% higher DRI than those above it (P = 0.05). DRI was negatively correlated with age (P = 0.018), dialysis vintage (P = 0.039), interdialytic weight gain P = 0.007), Vitamin D level, and serum albumin (P = 0.005) and positively correlate with parathyroid hormone (PTH) level (P = 0.000). No impact was seen by the mode of dialysis, being diabetic, using anti-hypertensive therapy, body mass index, Kt/V, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, ferritin, C-reactive protein, Ca, or P. DRI in our Arab patients was comparable to erythropoietin resistance indices reported in other communities. Higher DRI was observed in females, PC users, lower serum albumin, lower Vitamin D, and shorter dialysis vintage. A negative correlation existed between DRI and age, dialysis vintage, interdialytic weight, and serum albumin and a positive correlation with PTH level.

Clinical outcomes with use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) use in left ventricular assist devices (LVAD)-supported patients.

BACKGROUND

Use of ESAs in patients with LVADs may minimize blood transfusions and decrease allosensitization. ESAs increase thrombotic events, which is concerning because LVADs are sensitive to pump thrombosis (PT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 221 patients at our center who received a HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, California) LVAD between January 1, 2009 and June 6, 2013. Patients were divided into those who received ESAs during index admission (n = 121) and those who did not (n = 100). Suspected PT was defined as evidence of thrombus in the LVAD or severe hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase >1,000 mg/dl or plasma-free hemoglobin >40 mg/dl). Outcomes were compared between cohorts using inverse probability-weighted analyses.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 14.2 ± 11.9 months, suspected PT occurred in 37 patients (ESA 23%, no ESA 12%; p =0.03). The ESA cohort received ESAs 13.9 ± 60.9 days after LVAD implantation. At 180 days, event-free rates for suspected PT were ESA 78.6% versus no ESA 94.5% (p < 0.001). ESA use had higher rates of suspected PT (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38 to 4.00; p = 0.002). For every 100-unit increase in cumulative ESA dosage, the hazard of suspected PT increased by 10% (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.16; p < 0.001). After inverse probability weighting, ESA use was associated with a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.33; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ESA use in LVAD patients is associated with higher rates of suspected PT.