Integrative diagnostics of the gastro-intestinal tract - gastroesophageal reflux and constipation in practice

Common disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, such as gastroesophageal reflux/disease (GER/D) and constipation, are frequent causes for seeking medical support in infants. Diagnostic workup must ensure that diagnosed diseases are responsible for such complaints, thus enabling appropriate therapy. In this context assessment consists of clinical examination, functional tests, and imaging, which should be done in a staged manner. Close cooperation between clinicians and clinical radiologists enables optimal diagnostics, thus forming the basis for appropriate therapy.

Modern insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of pseudoachalasia

BACKGROUND

Secondary achalasia or pseudoachalasia is a clinical presentation undistinguishable from achalasia in terms of symptoms, manometric, and radiographic findings, but associated with different and identifiable underlying causes.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on the PubMed database restricting results to the English language. Key terms used were "achalasia-like" with 63 results, "secondary achalasia" with 69 results, and "pseudoachalasia" with 141 results. References of the retrieved papers were also manually reviewed.

RESULTS

Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoachalasia is a rare disease. Most available evidence regarding this condition is based on case reports or small retrospective series. There are different causes but all culminating in outflow obstruction. Clinical presentation and image and functional tests overlap with primary achalasia or are inaccurate, thus the identification of secondary achalasia can be delayed. Inadequate diagnosis leads to futile therapies and could worsen prognosis, especially in neoplastic disease. Routine screening is not justifiable; good clinical judgment still remains the best tool. Therapy should be aimed at etiology. Even though Heller's myotomy brings the best results in non-malignant cases, good clinical judgment still remains the best tool as well.

A complex case of dysphagia with dual aetiology

A woman in her early 60s was referred with dysphagia and chest pain to a tertiary referral centre specialising in oesophageal disorders. Cardiac symptom origin and sinister oesophageal pathology had been excluded at her local hospital in NHS Scotland. Under multidisciplinary team oversight, reinvestigation of mucosal pathology and oesophageal motility ultimately uncovered both Type III achalasia and eosinophilic oesophagitis. This case demonstrates the benefit of including provocative testing during high-resolution manometry to reproduce relevant dysphagia and the importance of stopping proton-pump inhibitors long enough to uncover excessive eosinophils which could otherwise be masked. Ultimately, tailored management for both conditions separately was required to achieve symptoms resolution.

[Chinese expert consensus on colonic and anorectal manometry (2023 edition)]

Colonic and anorectal manometry includes anorectal manometry and colonic manometry. Anorectal manometry is a common method to evaluate anorectal function, which can objectively reflect the pathological and physiological abnormalities of outlet obstructive constipation and fecal incontinence, as well as the impact of anorectal surgery on continence. Colonic manometry is a new type of colon motility detection method developed in recent years. It can record the peristalsis and contraction of the whole colon through a pressure measuring catheter, which helps physicians further evaluate various colonic diseases. However, various factors such as testing equipment, operating standards, and evaluation parameters are difficult to unify. There is no consensus on the operation and interpretation of colorectal anal pressure measurement. Under the guidance of the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, in collaboration with Clinical Guidelines Committee, Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Anorectal motility disorders Committee , Colorectal Surgeons Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Colonic Branch of China international exchange and promotive association for medical and healthcare, Tianjin Union Medical Center is leading the organization of domestic experts in this field. Based on searching relevant literature and combining clinical experience at home and abroad, after multiple discussions, the "Chinese expert consensus on colonic and anorectal manometry" has been prepared. This consensus discusses the indications, contraindications, pre examination management and technical procedures, treatment of complications, and interpretation of examination reports for colonic and anorectal manometry , aiming to guide the standardized clinical practice of colonic and anorectal manometry.

Rectal sensitivity and associated factors in patients with different subtypes of functional defecation disorder

OBJECTIVE

To investigate rectal sensitivity and associated factors in patients with different subtypes of functional defecation disorder (FDD).

METHODS

We segregated individuals diagnosed with FDD into two groups based on their defecation patterns: those with dyssynergic defecation and those with inadequate defecatory propulsion. We gathered general information through questionnaires and assessed rectal sensitivity using anorectal manometry. The rectal sensitivity performances of the two groups were compared; the factors related to rectal sensitivity were analyzed to determine the factors associated with rectal sensitivity, and the effect of biofeedback therapy on rectal sensitivity was clarified.

RESULTS

Rectal sensitivity in different subtypes of FDD decreased, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the first constant sensation volume, defecatory desire volume, and maximum tolerable volume between the different subtypes of FDD ( P  > 0.05). Multi-factor binary logistic regression analysis showed that age, constipation symptom score, and diabetes were all independent risk factors for decreased rectal sensitivity ( P  < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the prior- and post-biofeedback therapy in the first constant sensation volume, defecatory desire volume, and maximum tolerable volume ( P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rectal sensitivity in different subtypes of FDD decreased. Age, constipation symptom score, and diabetes were independent risk factors for decreased rectal sensitivity. Short-term biofeedback therapy did not improve rectal hyposensitivity in patients with FDD.

Assessment of manometric results following posterior pericervical repair or level I to III surgical procedures

Constipation and obstructive bowel disorders are the most common symptoms of prolapse and posterior defects. Prolapse and obstructive defecation disorders are treated using various surgical techniques to repair posterior defects. This study aimed to evaluate the manometry results of patients before and after reconstructive surgery of the posterior compartment. This retrospective cohort study included 40 women with defecation disorders referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, an academic center affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. Data were collected through medical records and a checklist developed by the researcher before and after surgery. All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 26), with significance at p<0.05. Forty women with a mean age of 49.47±9.66 years participated in this study. The manometry results showed significant differences in patients before and after surgery in parameters such as maximum resting pressure, push test, constipation, straining during defecation, finger support necessity, sensation of incomplete defecation, dyspareunia, and husband's sexual satisfaction (p<0.001). In addition, all patients had a grade 2 or higher posterior compartment prolapse, which improved in all cases after surgery (p<0.0001). Patients' symptoms significantly improved during the 12-month follow-up after DeLancey level 3 to 1 surgery. This type of surgery proved to be an effective surgical intervention without significant complications in the short-term follow-up.

Predictors of Underlying Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients Presenting with Esophageal Candidiasis

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are a known risk factor for esophageal candidiasis (EC), but this relation has not been described particularly well. We sought to evaluate the predictors of underlying EMDs in patients presenting with EC.

METHODS

Cases of EC at a single medical center between 2010 and 2021 were identified retrospectively based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and manometric data were reviewed. The diagnosis of EC was based on typical endoscopic appearance.

RESULTS

In total, 130 EC patients were identified (mean age 69.5 ± 14.6; 66.2% male). Of these, 12 (9.2%) had an underlying EMD (11 cases of achalasia; 1 case of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction). Five (41.7%) of these patients had previously been diagnosed as having an EMD, whereas 7 were newly diagnosed only after their presentation with EC. No significant differences were noted between those with or without EMDs in terms of demographics, medical comorbidities, or medication use. Patients with an EMD, however, were more likely to complain of dysphagia (91.7% vs 30.5%, P < 0.001), and on endoscopy, they were more likely to have residual food in the esophagus, residual fluid in the esophagus, a dilated esophagus, and resistance to traversing the esophagogastric junction (all P < 0.001). Sixty-one (46.9%) patients with EC died during follow-up (mean 58 months).

CONCLUSIONS

EMDs are present in approximately 10% of patients presenting with EC, with half being diagnosed only after presenting with EC. Similar to non-EC patients, patients with EC with dysphagia and the typical endoscopic findings of achalasia are more likely to have an EMD and warrant prompt manometric evaluation.

[Recurrent acute pancreatitis secondary to sphincter of oddi dysfunction: Case report]

Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) is a rare pathology that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with biliary pain episodes or recurrent acute pancreatitis and a background of cholecystectomy. Generally, these are patients with multiple consultations where this pathology has considerably affected their quality of life. Diagnosis is based on clinical findings, serological markers and supporting diagnostic tests requested according to the suspected sphincteric component. The most effective treatment is endoscopic sphincterotomy. The use of prosthesis is accepted but debated. We present the case of a male patient in his forties who consulted for multiple episodes of recurrent acute pancreatitis with etiology studies suspecting dysfunction of the pancreatic sphincter of Oddi and who was taken to endoscopic management with improvement of his clinical picture.

The influence of supragastric belching severity on esophageal acid exposure and motility

BACKGROUND

Supragastric belching (SGB) is a phenomenon where air is rapidly sucked from the pharynx into the esophagus and immediately expelled through abdominal straining. It is considered a behavior disorder and is increasingly recognized not only in patients with excessive belching, but also in those with reflux-like symptoms. Increased prevalence of esophageal hypomotility and increased acid exposure were previously reported in small cohorts of SGB patients. We aimed to clarify the impact of SGB on motility, reflux, and acid exposure in a large cohort of SGB patients.

METHODS

In a single-center database study, we searched for patients with pathological SGB. MII-pH and Manometry tracings were manually re-evaluated in all patients. Demographic, clinical, motility, reflux, and SGB-related data were gathered.

KEY RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-eight patients were included. Heartburn, belching, and regurgitation were the most common symptoms. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was found in 27% of patients. SGB related to 47% of all reflux and to 53.6% of acid reflux events, and accounted for 27.3% of acid exposure time (AET). In those with severe SGB, 62% of acid reflux events and 46% of AET were SGB-related.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Supragastric belching is common, associated with higher incidence of IEM and is responsible for almost a third of esophageal acid burden. The impact of SGB is proportional to its severity. Diagnosis of SGB should be sought in patients with excessive belching and in patients with refractory reflux symptoms. Recognizing SGB and treating patients with behavioral therapy may alleviate acid exposure and improve quality of life.

Clinical efficacy and mechanism of transcutaneous neuromodulation on ineffective esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorder is one of the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The clinical and functional relationship between the ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and GERD have been found. PPI is a widely used drug of this diaease, but some patients have poor efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and possible mechanism of Transcutaneous Neuromodulation in these patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with GERD with IEM were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups, one group was TN ST-36 group, the other group was sham TN group. The GERD questionnaire (GerdQ), quality of life score, MOS item short from health survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to assess the severity of symptoms. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) test was performed to assess low esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and distal contractile integral (DCI). The heart rate variability (HRV) test was performed to assess autonomic nervous function.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with sham TN, chronic TN treatment decreased the GERD-Q score (p < 0.001). The anxiety score (p = 0.058) and depression score (p = 0.156) were decreased, but there were no statistical differences. Chronic TN treatment also significantly improved the quality of life of patients, mainly in physical function, physical pain, overall health, vitality, social function, emotional function, and mental health. Acute TN treatment increased the DCI (p < 0.001) and LES pressure (p < 0.001) significantly and decreased the combined percentage of failed and weak peristalsis (p < 0.001). Concurrently, acute TN enhanced vagal activity (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

IEM is an important link in the pathogenesis of GERD. Chronic TN treatment can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients. Acute TN treatment can significantly increase LES pressure and DCI and reduce the frequency of esophageal lost peristalsis and weak peristalsis. The improvement of esophageal motility in GERD patients with IEM by TN treatment may be related to the regulation of autonomic nervous function.

The Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Gradient and the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in the Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: an Analysis of 500 Esophageal Function Tests

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathophysiology is multifactorial. Greater importance has been attributed to a defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in comparison to an altered transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient (TPG). This study aims to evaluate the role of the TPG and LES disfunction in GERD pathogenesis.

METHODS

Five hundred consecutive esophageal function tests from patients with clinically suspected GERD were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the pH monitoring in GERD positive or GERD negative. Abdominal pressure, thoracic pressure, TPG (abdominal-thoracic pressures), LES resting pressure (mid-respiratory, expiratory, and EGJ-CI), and LES retention pressure (LES resting pressure-TPG) were determined.

RESULTS

GERD was present in 296 (59%) individuals. GERD-positive patients were mostly males. LES resting pressure (by all parameters) and thoracic pressure were not different between groups. Abdominal pressure and TPG were higher in GERD-positive patients. LES retention pressure (by all parameters) was lower in GERD-positive patients. DeMeester score had a positive correlation with LES resting pressure, TPG, and LES retention pressure (by all parameters) but not with abdominal pressure and thoracic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

LES valvular competency as measured by absolute resting pressure was not reliable to predict GERD; however, it was associated with GERD severity. Relative LES pressure (LES retention pressure) predicted GERD presence and severity, but no parameter showed superiority. TPG plays an important role in the pathophysiology of GERD since it is related to GERD presence and severity; still TPG is altered mostly based on a higher abdominal pressure.

Effect of effortful swallow on pharyngeal pressures during swallowing in adults with dysphagia: A pharyngeal high-resolution manometry study

Purpose: Evidence base to support the use of the effortful swallow in clinical populations with dysphagia is currently lacking. This study aims to quantify the effects of effortful swallowing on pharyngeal swallowing biomechanics in adults with dysphagia using pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (PHRM).Method: ManoScan HRM equipment with a 4.2 mm pressure catheter was used. Participants completed duplicate 10ml baseline and 10ml effortful liquid (IDDSI Level 0) swallows in randomised order. PHRM data were analysed using a semi-automated online platform (www.swallowgateway.com).Result: Fifteen adults (8 males; range 45-86 years) with mixed aetiology dysphagia (Functional Oral Intake Scale Level 2-5) were included. Median pharyngeal contractile (156.81 mmHg cm s; IQR 80.62) increased significantly (213.50 mmHg cm s; IQR 117.2) during effortful swallowing. Significant increases were also observed in velopharyngeal pressure, mesopharyngeal pressure, hypopharyngeal pressure and upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) relaxation duration. UOS integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was not significantly altered with effortful swallowing.Conclusion: Effortful swallowing induced significant biomechanical changes to swallow in adults with dysphagia. Increases in global pharyngeal rigour, tongue base pressure and UOS opening duration were captured by PHRM during effortful swallowing. Further investigation in larger homogeneous clinical populations is needed to verify the physiological effects of this frequently employed intervention.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Fundoplication is an essential step in para-oesophageal hernia (POH) repair, but which type minimizes postoperative mechanical complications is controversial.

Methods

This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted between May 2009 and October 2018. Patients with symptomatic POH were allocated to either a total (Nissen) or a posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair. The primary outcome was dysphagia (Ogilvie dysphagia scores) at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were peri- and postoperative complications, swallowing difficulties assessed by the Dakkak dysphagia score, gastro-oesophageal reflux, quality of life (QoL), and radiologically confirmed hernia recurrence.

Results

A total of 70 patients were randomized to a Nissen (n = 32) or a Toupet (n = 38) fundoplication. Compared with baseline, Ogilvie dysphagia scores were stable at the 3- and 6-month follow-up in the Nissen group (P = 0.075 and 0.084 respectively) but significantly improved in the Toupet group (from baseline mean (s.d.): 1.4 (1.1) to 0.5 ( 0.8) at 3 months, and 0.5 (0.6) at 6 months; P = 0.003 and P = 0.001 respectively). At 6 months, Dakkak dysphagia scores were significantly higher in the Nissen group than in the Toupet group (mean (s.d.): 10.4 (7.9) versus 5.1 (7.2); P = 0.003). QoL scores improved throughout the follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the absolute median improvement (⍙) from preoperative values in the mental component scores of the Short Form-36 QoL questionnaire was significantly higher in the Toupet group (median (i.q.r.): 7.1 (−0.6 to 15.2) versus 1.0 (−5.4 to 3.3) at 3 months, and 11.2 (1.4 to 18.3) versus 0.4 (−9.4 to 7.5) at 6 months; (P = 0.010 and 0.003 respectively)). At 6 months, radiologically confirmed POH recurrence occurred in 11 of 24 patients (46 per cent) of the Nissen group and in 15 of 32 patients (47 per cent) of the Toupet group (P = 1.001).

Conclusions

A partial posterior wrap (Toupet fundoplication) showed reduced obstructive complications and improved QoL compared with a total (Nissen) fundoplication following POH repair.

Registration number: NCT04436159 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

Safety and Tolerability of Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry

Purpose Pharyngeal high-resolution manometry is an emerging practice for diagnosis of swallowing disorders in the upper aerodigestive tract. Advancement of a catheter through the upper esophageal sphincter may introduce safety considerations. There are no published studies of catheter placement complications, side effects, or tolerability. This study examines patient-reported side effects and tolerability of pharyngeal high-resolution manometry. Method Data were collected prospectively from 133 adult patients who underwent pharyngeal high-resolution manometry for the 1st time. Patients rated tolerability specific to "nose" and "throat" using a visual analog scale for 4 procedure time points: catheter passage, during the procedure, catheter removal, and after the procedure. Complications during catheter passage and removal were recorded. A telephone call was placed to the patient within 6 days to survey side effects experienced after the procedure. Results The patient sample was composed of 91 males and 42 females with a mean age of 66 years ( SD = 14.4). Tolerability scores for catheter passage showed no significant difference ( p = .7288) in the nose versus throat. Tolerability for females was significantly less ( p = .0144) than that for males. Participants with the shortest procedure duration showed greatest discomfort in the nose ( p = .0592) and throat ( p = .0286). Complications included gag response (14%), emesis (2%), and epistaxis (< 1%). Side effects included sore throat (16%), nose discomfort (16%), coughing (11 %), nosebleed (4%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). Conclusions High-resolution manometry appears to have high patient tolerability with low incidence of side effects. Rates of complications and side effects are similar to those reported for other transnasal procedures.

Solid state biliary manometry catheter: impact on diagnosis and post-study pancreatitis

Perfusion manometry of the sphincter of Oddi has been the standard for the investigation of patients with presumed sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). Microtransducer manometry (MTM) of the sphincter of Oddi represents an alternative to perfusion manometry. The technical success and reproducibility of MTM are as good as for perfusion manometry. Current data suggest that the upper limit for normal of basal sphincter of Oddi pressures measured with MTM lies at approximately 35 mm Hg. Pancreatitis risk after MTM in patients with SOD compares favorably with that after perfusion manometry. Low cost and ease of handling make MTM of the sphincter of Oddi an attractive alternative.

The relationship between aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity: an invasive study

OBJECTIVES

The aortic augmentation index (AI) and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) are known to be indicators of arterial stiffness. However, it is not clear whether aortic AI and PWV reflect aortic stiffness in similar ways. We investigated the relationship between aortic AI and PWV by measuring them directly using a catheter technique.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty-one patients, aged 34-79 years, were studied during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Aortic pressures were measured using a catheter-tip manometer at two points, one in the ascending aorta and one 40 cm distally in the descending aorta. Aortic AI was defined as the difference between early and late pressure peaks divided by the pulse pressure of the ascending aorta. Aortic PWV was calculated as the distance between the two measuring sites divided by the transit time. We also examined the effects of vasodilatation on AI and PWV by the intra-aortic administration of nitroglycerin in 15 patients.

RESULTS

AI was significantly related to age, systolic aortic pressure, heart rate, left ventricular ejection time, and height. Aortic PWV showed an association only with age and systolic aortic pressure. There was no significant relationship between aortic AI and PWV (r = 0.28, NS). Nitroglycerin also produced different effects on aortic AI and PWV: aortic AI was significantly decreased (-0.17, P < 0.01) after nitroglycerin, but PWV remained unchanged (+0.4 m/s, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic AI and PWV cannot be used interchangeably as an index of arterial stiffness. AI may not be a true indicator of arterial stiffness, but an index of wave reflection including PWV.

The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases

BACKGROUND

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has become standard in the management of neurocritical patients. A variety of monitoring techniques and devices are available, each offering advantages and disadvantages. Analysis of large populations has never been performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was designed to evaluate the Camino fiberoptic intraparenchymal cerebral pressure monitor for complications and accuracy.

RESULTS

Between 1992-2004 one thousand consecutive patients had a fiberoptic ICP monitor placed. The most frequent indication for monitoring was severe head injury (697 cases). The average duration of ICP monitoring was 184.6 +/- 94.3 hours; the range was 16-581 hours. Zero drift (range, -17 to 21 mm Hg; mean 7.3 +/- 5.1) was recorded after the devices were removed from 624 patients. Mechanical complications such as: breakage of the optical fiber (n = 17); dislocations of the fixation screw (n = 15) or the probe (n = 13); and failure of ICP recording for unknown reasons (n = 4) were found in 49 Camino devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The Camino ICP sensor remains one of the most popular ICP monitoring devices for use in critical neurosurgical patients. The system offers reliable ICP measurements in an acceptable percentage of device complications and the advantage of in vivo recalibration. The incidence of technical complications was low and similar to others devices.

Complications of sphincter of Oddi manometry: biliary-like pain versus acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Although acute pancreatitis is the most significant complication of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), acute biliary-like abdominal pain--similar or identical to the patient's usual recurrent acute episodes of pain and not fulfilling clinical criteria for acute pancreatitis--can also be provoked by SOM. The aim of the article is to determine and compare the relative frequency of occurrence of, and risk factors for, post-manometry biliary-like abdominal pain and post-manometry pancreatitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical and laboratory features, the manometric recordings from the sphincter of Oddi, and the immediate post-manometry outcomes, were examined in 234 consecutive patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry at our Unit.

RESULTS

Post-manometry pancreatitis occurred in 9% of patients, and was associated with two risk factors on multivariate analysis: a history of post-ERCP pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] 5.9) and a raised basal sphincter pressure (> or =40 mmHg) at SOM (OR 3.5). An increased sphincter phasic wave frequency (> or =7/min) at SOM was identified as a significant (p<0.05) risk factor on univariate testing only. Post-manometry biliary-like pain occurred in 12% of patients, and was associated with 3 different risk factors on multivariate analysis: age below 50 years (OR 4.6); less than a 2-year history of recurrent abdominal pain (OR 3.0); and ERCP and/or ES carried out during the SOM procedure (OR 9.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Provocation of biliary-like pain following SOM, without clinical evidence of pancreatitis, occurs at least as frequently as post-manometry acute pancreatitis. In contrast to post-manometry pancreatitis, post-manometry biliary-like pain occurs more often in younger patients with a shorter duration of symptoms and does not appear related to the manometric features of the sphincter documented at SOM; we propose that this clinical entity may reflect the presence of bile duct or duodenal hypersensitivity/hyperalgesia.

Applicability and reproducibility of condom catheter method for measuring isovolumetric bladder pressure

OBJECTIVES

To report on the applicability, reproducibility, and adverse events of the noninvasive condom catheter method in the first 730 subjects of a longitudinal survey of changes in urinary bladder contractility secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, in which 1300 men will be evaluated three times in 5 years using this method.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited by general practitioners, general publicity, and e-mail. Only those meeting the study criteria were entered in the study. If the free flow rate exceeded 5.4 mL/s, at least two consecutive condom pressure measurements were attempted using the condom catheter method. The condom pressure measured reflected the isovolumetric bladder pressure, a measure of urinary bladder contractility. The reproducibility of the method was quantified by a difference plot of the two maximal condom pressures measured in each subject.

RESULTS

In 618 (94%) of 659 eligible participants, one condom pressure measurement was completed; two measurements were done in 555 (84%). The maximal condom pressure ranged from 28 to 228 cm H2O (overall mean 101, SD 34). A difference between the two pressures of less than +/-21 cm H2O was found in 80%. The mean difference was -1 cm H2O (SD 18), significantly different from 0. Some adverse events such as terminal self-limiting hematuria were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The condom catheter method is very suitable for large-scale use. It has a success rate of 94% and a reproducibility comparable to that of invasive pressure flow studies.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry does not predispose to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi manometry is helpful in selecting patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who will respond to sphincterotomy. However, studies have shown that sphincter of Oddi manometry is associated with a high risk of post-procedure pancreatitis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of sphincter of Oddi manometry in patients with sphincter of 2Oddi dysfunction. The secondary objective was to determine the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively for 268 patients who had elective ERCP performed at 3 tertiary care medical centers between 1996 and 2000. Consecutive patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction formed the case group; the control group consisted of patients with bile duct stone. The case group was further subclassified into group A, patients who underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry followed by immediate ERCP, and group B, patients who had ERCP without manometry. The rate of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis was compared between case and control groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven percent of patients in the case group with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction developed acute pancreatitis compared with 3.2% of patients in the control group with bile duct stone (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of acute pancreatitis in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry and ERCP compared with patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who had ERCP without sphincter of Oddi manometry (odds ratio 0.72: 95% CI[0.08, 9.2]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that biliary sphincterotomy (p=0.006) and pancreatography (p=0.03) were independent predictors of acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction are at higher risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. Sphincter of Oddi manometry by itself does not appear to predispose to this complication.

Key issues in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

SOD is a challenging condition that is difficult to diagnose and treat. The high failure rate of endoscopic and surgical treatment reflects the difficulties in establishing accurate diagnosis and the lack of specific objective criteria by which appropriate therapy could be determined. In general, sphincter ablation should be offered for type I patients. An initial trial of medical therapy is appropriate for type II patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms and for all type III patients. SOM is highly recommended for type II patients and is mandatory for all type III patients if sphincter ablation is contemplated. Other causes of abdominal pain such as chronic pancreatitis or functional disorders should be considered in patients not benefiting from sphincter ablation. All procedures on the sphincter should be undertaken with caution after meticulous investigation, and patient selection should be based on strict objective criteria.

Reduced risk for pancreatitis after endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi: a randomized comparison with the perfusion manometry technique

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi has been shown to be a reliable alternative to perfusion manometry for evaluating sphincter of Oddi motor function. It avoids volume loading of the biliopancreatic system, and may therefore be associated with a lower risk of inducing postmanometry pancreatitis.[nl]

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a 2-year period, microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi was carried out in 215 patients (median age 42 years; 155 women; biliary study in 152 cases, additional pancreatic evaluation in 63 cases). Sphincter of Oddi manometry was conducted as the sole procedure in all patients. The frequency of pancreatitis was assessed prospectively and graded according to established guidelines. A total of 130 consecutive patients (median age 37 years, 92 women; 30 with biliary type II, 58 with type III, 34 with pancreatic type I, and eight with type II) were then randomly assigned to undergo microtransducer or perfusion manometry of the sphincter of Oddi in a standardized fashion.

RESULTS

During the initial 2-year period, nine cases of pancreatitis (a pancreatitis frequency of 4.2 %) were observed after microtransducer manometry, and most were of mild degree (six mild, two moderate, and one severe). No deaths occurred, and no surgical procedures were required. In the randomized part of the study, the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in both groups, as well as the technical aspects of the procedures performed, were well matched. The frequency of pancreatitis after microtransducer manometry was 3.1 %, compared with 13.8 % after perfusion manometry ( P < 0.05). Pancreatitis occurred in two patients after microtransducer manometry, and was mild in both cases. After perfusion manometry, mild pancreatitis occurred in six patients and moderate pancreatitis in three.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi is associated with a lower risk for postmanometry pancreatitis than standard perfusion manometry.

Reduction in the incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry: a successful quality improvement project

OBJECTIVE

Acute pancreatitis is a recognized complication of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM). Its frequency of occurrence has been reported in the range of 4 to 31%. In an earlier retrospective study performed at this institution, the incidence of pancreatitis was 9.3% in patients who only had SOM compared with 26.1% in those patients who had SOM and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy at the same session. On the basis of these data, a quality-improvement project was initiated at two university-affiliated hospitals. This involved performance of SOM without ERCP. If ERCP was required, it was performed at a different session. The purpose of this project was to decrease the incidence of pancreatitis associated with SOM.

METHODS

This study involved prospective patient identification and retrospective chart review of patients who underwent SOM without ERCP between May 1998 and December 2000. SOM was performed using a triple-lumen catheter with water perfusion at a rate of 0.25 ml/min using an Arndorfer pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system. The data recorded included pancreatitis after SOM, pancreatitis after ERCP and sphincterotomy, average days in the hospital after pancreatitis, and time between SOM and ERCP.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were studied. Three (7.32%) patients had pancreatitis after SOM. Five patients subsequently underwent ERCP and sphincterotomy and one (20%) patient had pancreatitis. The overall frequency of pancreatitis after SOM and any subsequent ERCP or sphincterotomy was 4 (9.78%) of 41 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-22.5%). The odds ratio for pancreatitis with ERCP and SOM at the same time compared with the SOM-only strategy was 3.26 (P = 0.05). The average stay in the hospital after pancreatitis ranged from 2 to 4 days, with a mean length of stay of 2.75 days. The time between SOM and subsequent ERCP ranged from 6 to 20 days, with a mean of 10.4 days.

CONCLUSION

By adopting a protocol to perform diagnostic SOM, separate from ERCP and sphincterotomy, we were able to decrease the incidence of pancreatitis considerably at our institutions.

Perception of esophageal manometry

Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well-being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy-one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side-effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.

Correlation between sphincter of Oddi manometry and intraductal ultrasound morphology in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) makes it possible to study sphincter of Oddi morphology during endoscopy. Two recent IDUS studies have described the sphincter of Oddi as a circumferential hypoechoic layer in the papilla, but there have as yet been few published data from patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (seven men, 14 women; age 54 +/- 17 years) were enrolled in the study. Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry was carried out using a 4-Fr electronic microtransducer device. After this, a wire-guided 6-Fr ultrasound catheter was placed in the common bile duct (CBD), and IDUS was carried out while the ultrasound catheter was being withdrawn from the CBD toward the duodenum.

RESULTS

Sphincter of Oddi manometry and IDUS were carried out successfully in 18 of the 21 patients. Sphincter of Oddi manometry revealed sphincter of Oddi hypertension (baseline pressure > 35 mmHg) in eight patients. The mean sphincter of Oddi baseline pressure was 32 +/- 17 mmHg, and the mean phasic sphincter of Oddi pressure was 132 +/- 31 mmHg. During IDUS, a circumferential hypoechoic layer was clearly delineated in all patients. There was a significant correlation between the manometrically determined length of the sphincter of Oddi (8 +/- 2 mm) and the thickness of the hypoechoic layer (6 +/- 2 mm) as assessed by IDUS (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). However, no correlation was found between the baseline or phasic sphincter of Oddi pressures and the thickness of the hypoechoic layer. Accordingly, IDUS did not allow identification of patients with sphincter of Oddi hypertension. Mild pancreatitis was observed in one of the 18 patients (6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The circumferential hypoechoic layer of the papilla visualized by IDUS is the ultrasonographic correlate of the sphincter of Oddi. IDUS of the papilla is technically feasible and safe in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. IDUS may provide additional information at the sphincter of Oddi level, but cannot be used as a substitute for sphincter of Oddi manometry.

Incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM)

OBJECTIVE

Sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) is a useful diagnostic procedure when evaluating patients with unexplained biliary pain or idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis is a recognized complication of SOM whose pathogenesis appears to be multifactoral. We conducted this study to determine the incidence of pancreatitis in patients after SOM and to identify any variables that may lead to an increased incidence of pancreatitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients who underwent SOM between 1992 and 1996 at two university-affiliated hospitals was done. SOM was performed using a triple lumen catheter with each lumen perfused at a rate of 0.25 cc/min using an Arndorfer pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system. The following data were recorded: age, gender, clinical type of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, length of procedure, doses of medications used, duct cannulated, sphincter of Oddi pressure, whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy was performed, and the number of patients developing pancreatitis. Statistical analysis was performed using a T test, chi2, and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of pancreatitis was 17%. Six patients with type II SO dysfunction and 11 patients with type III SO dysfunction developed pancreatitis. The incidence of pancreatitis was significantly lower in those patients who only had SOM, compared with those patients who had SOM and ERCP (9.3% vs 26.1%, p < 0.026). There was no significant correlation between age, gender, duration of procedure, dose of midazolam used, sphincter of Oddi pressure, or type of SO dysfunction with the development of SOM-induced pancreatitis. Multiple regression analysis showed that sphincterotomy added no additional risk, beyond that associated with ERCP, for the development of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the incidence of pancreatitis was highest when SOM was followed by ERCP. A potential method of decreasing the incidence of pancreatitis after SOM is performing ERCP with or without sphincterotomy at another session, separated from the SOM by at least 24 h. Before this can be definitely recommended, the results of this study must be validated by others or by a prospective study.

[Intracranial pressure monitoring in France, and French-speaking Belgium and Switzerland. Retrospective and prospective survey]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of ICP monitoring in France and French-speaking Belgium and Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) and neuroanaesthesia teams.

METHODS

Retrospective survey (concerning the year 1995), followed by a prospective one (spread over a period of 4 months in 1996) about policy concerning: frequency, delay, duration, indications, complications and cost of ICP monitoring in their units. Other questions were: type of devices, duration of the device insertion, operators and place of operating.

RESULTS

Out of the 77 units which replied, 54 regularly carried out ICP monitoring, corresponding to a total of 2,012 patients in 1995. Only 23 participated in the prospective survey (301 patients). Out of the 54 hospitals, 25 assessed the ICP in more than 50 patients per year. Head trauma was the main indication for ICP monitoring (61%), the second indication was intracranial haemorrhage (23% of patients). The most often monitored patients were young males for head trauma, whereas females were mainly monitored for intracranial haemorrhage. The delay for starting ICP monitoring was 16 hours and was maintained for 7 days in head trauma patients. Intraventricular catheter and fibreoptic devices were chosen in the same proportion, a subdural system was used in 8% of the cases. The devices were inserted by neurosurgeons in 80% of cases, anaesthetists also participated in this operation. Risk of haemorrhage was very low (0.7%), the risk of infection was 4% and always concerned intraventricular catheters.

CONCLUSION

ICP monitoring is widely practised in France and French-speaking Belgium and Switzerland, especially for traumatic brain injury in young males. Anaesthetists mainly took part in the operation, especially for the fibreoptic devices.

[Techniques for measuring intracranial hypertension]

A wide variety of monitoring devices have been used for intracranial pressure measurement. The aim of this article is to present the most common devices and to assess their accuracy, stability and complications, with reference to current literature. Measurement with an intraventricular catheter remains, the reference method. However new techniques with distal measurement (fiberoptic or strain gauge) seem to be accurate, but have a higher cost. Some practical problems, such as the zero pressure reference level and the side of measurement, are also discussed.

[Indications for monitoring intracranial pressure]

A main indication for intracranial pressure monitoring is severe head trauma, where it acts as a diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic guide. Others indications for intracranial pressure monitoring are patients with CSF circulation disturbances, whatever the cause, and various pathologies inducing intracranial hypertension, such as encephalopathies. Intracranial pressure monitoring must be associated with the measurement of mean arterial pressure, arterial and jugular venous oxygen saturation and blood flow velocity in major intracranial arteries with transcranial Doppler sonography.

[Perforation of the esophagus after esophageal manometry]

HISTORY AND FINDINGS

A 75-year-old man was admitted for oesophageal manometry because of dysphagia for the past 2 years and retrosternal burning sensation unrelated to exercise. His general condition was appropriate for his age.

INVESTIGATIONS

An oesophagogram showed corkscrew-like deformation of a diffuse oesophageal spasm. The first, but incomplete, manometry recorded clearly propulsive contractions with markedly raised and prolonged pressure, as in "nutcracker oesophagus". The lower oesophageal sphincter could not be demonstrated initially. Subsequent pH measurements provided no evidence for increased gastrooesophageal reflux.

TREATMENT AND FURTHER COURSE

After the first manometry conservative treatment was initiated with molsidomine, nifedipine and nitrospray sublingual, but the dysphagia was not significantly improved. A second manometry was performed before a planned surgical exploration. Placing of the catheter was again difficult and mild resistance experienced. Endoscopy revealed only minimal, presumably superficial, mucosal lesions. 2 days later bilateral pleural effusions together with mediastinitis occurred. Conservative treatment was continued until finally a distal oesophageal perforation was demonstrated. At surgery the perforation was seen and a oesophagectomy with gastric pull-through and intrathoracic anastomosis performed. However, the patient died of septic multi-organ failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal manometry is a safe but invasive method with few complications for measuring oesophageal motility. Although this has not previously been reported, oesophageal perforation with mediastinitis may end fatally, if the particular circumstances are unfavourable. In addition to special anatomical features, type and state of the manometric catheter may present a risk factor.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry in various biliary diseases: a report in 20 Thai patients

This is the first report of sphincter of Oddi manometry study in 20 Thai patients with various biliary diseases. The yield of abnormal SOM in 3 of 17 in our study was low and was comparable to other reports. The successful rate of 85 per cent and complication rate were acceptable. Careful clinical assessment is mandatory before SOM study in order to gain the best benefit and minimize the risk of SOM.

Effects of esophageal pressure monitoring on sleep architecture

Esophageal pressure (Pes) monitoring can be performed during polysomnography with a thin, water-filled catheter connected to a transducer. The resulting quantitative assessment of respiratory effort aids in the diagnosis of sleep-related breathing disorders, but little is known about the potential effect of the procedure on sleep architecture. We monitored Pes during polysomnography in 155 patients and compared their sleep architecture with that of 155 matched patients who slept without esophageal catheters. Cases were matched for age, sex, and severity of respiratory disturbance during sleep. Esophageal manometry was associated with small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrements in total recording time, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, percent Stage 2 sleep, and percent rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, and with increases in latency to REM sleep, latency to persistent sleep, and percent Stage 3/4 sleep. The differences were of such small magnitude that their clinical significance is doubtful. The number of awakenings per hour of sleep, latency to sleep onset, and percent Stage 1 sleep were no different when esophageal manometry was used. We conclude that the effects of monitoring Pes on sleep architecture are minimal, and that the decision of whether or not to use the technique can be based to a large extent on whether quantitative information about respiratory effort will be useful.

[Risk factors in endoscopic manometry for suspected dysfunction of Oddi's sphincter]

OBJECTIVE

An increased incidence of pancreatitis having been reported after endoscopic manometry (EM) of the sphincter of Oddi, its incidence and severity as well as potential risk factors were investigated prospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1988 and June 1996, standardised manometry was performed in 207 patients with suspected biliary and 23 with suspected pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). All patients had been observed in hospital for at least 24 hours before the test. The diagnostic criteria of post-manometric pancreatitis (PMP) were epigastric pain and a rise in the concentration of serum amylase to at least three times normal. Potential risk factors for PMP were elucidated by uni- and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Pancreatitis occurred in 19 patients (9%) with suspected biliary and in 6 (26%) with suspected pancreatic SOD (P < 0.01), 17 of mild and 8 of moderate degree. There were no deaths and no lasting sequelae. Previous pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and the presence of SOD were identified as patient-associated risk factors (P < 0.01 for each). Method-associated risk factors were duration of manometry of more than 5 min (P < 0.05) and manometry in the pancreatic duct system (P < 0.05). The risk of pancreatitis was reduced by simultaneous endoscopic sphincterotomy for SOD (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Specific and often avoidable risk factors for postmanometric pancreatitis were identified: technical procedure, pancreatitis, SOD. With short duration of manometry, avoiding of manometry in the pancreatic duct system and with patient's informed consent for simultaneous endoscopic sphincterotomy risk of pancreatitis may be lowered.

Does gastric tonometry work? No

Gastrointestinal tonometry is supposed to diagnose gut mucosal hypoxia using gastric luminal PCO2 and arterial bicarbonatemia, which are substituted in a modified Henderson-Hasselbach equation. This article reviews some of the problems inherent to the multiple assumptions underlying this technique. Tonometry is influenced by several local factors and by systemic acid-base imbalances that are unrelated to oxygenation. Tonometry is a rather crude and cumbersome method of gut capnometry, a technology that may provide valuable information regarding visceral perfusion, but not necessarily oxygenation.

The role of the flow rate of the pneumohydraulic system on post-sphincter of Oddi manometry pancreatitis

Manometry of sphincter of Oddi (SO) carries a risk of acute pancreatitis by a mechanism not yet clearly understood. This study attempted to evaluate the role of the flow rate of the perfusion system in the development of acute pancreatitis. During the past 60 months, we have performed 81 manometry studies of SO in 79 patients, 61 women and 18 men, who were referred for recurrent attacks of abdominal pain suggestive of SO dysfunction. All procedures were done by the same operator, utilizing the same instrumentation and similar premedication. In the first 54 studies, the pneumohydraulic system had a flow rate of 0.55 ml/min and a tank pressure of 15 lb/in2 while in the last 27 studies a flow rate of 0.27 ml/min and a pressure of 7.5 lb/in2 were employed. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed after 16 (19.7%) procedures. Fourteen (26%) of them occurred after high-flow-rate perfusion. In contrast, only 2 (7%) of the 27 patients who had the procedure done at the flow rate developed this complication (p less than 0.05). There was no correlation between the occurrence of pancreatitis, clinical suspicion of SO dysfunction, and the underlying manometric profile of the sphincter. We conclude that the incidence of procedure-related pancreatitis after manometry of SO is higher than following diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and that the flow rate in the perfusion system is a precipitating factor in the development of this complication.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter

This study was undertaken to determine whether routine use of a modified triple-lumen five French sphincter of Oddi manometry catheter would reduce the frequency and severity of post-manometry pancreatitis and pancreatic enzyme elevation. Seventy-six patients were alternately assigned to undergo sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) with a standard perfusion (infused group) catheter or the newly developed aspiration (aspirated group) catheter. After SOM, there were significantly more patients in the infused group with both amylase and lipase values elevated at least two times the upper limits of normal at 2 (p less than 0.001), 6 (p = 0.01), and 18 hours (p = 0.03) after the procedure. As compared with the standard perfusion system, the aspiration catheter was associated with a decreased frequency of clinical pancreatitis (23.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.01) reduced hospital stay (5 +/- 1.83 days, mean +/- SE, versus 1 day; p = 0.03) and milder pancreatitis. The aspiration manometry catheter should be considered for standard use for SOM, particularly if the pancreatic duct sphincter is being evaluated.

Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry

The nature, frequency, severity, and possible causes of complications after 207 sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements were studied in 146 patients. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 6% (12 of 207) of the investigations and in 8% (12 of 146) of the patients examined. The pancreatitis was mild in all patients. After cannulation of the pancreatic duct, acute pancreatitis occurred in 10 of 95 (11%) patients compared with one of 93 (1%) when the manometry catheter entered the bile duct only (p less than 0.02). Seven (58%) of the patients who developed acute pancreatitis, however, were found to be suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Some 26% of all sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements on patients with this diagnosis were complicated by an acute attack of pancreatitis compared with 3% (p less than 0.001) in patients without signs of chronic pancreatitis. In all patients the pancreatitis developed within three hours of manometry. We conclude that pancreatitis may occasionally follow sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement, even in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease, and that underlying chronic pancreatitis constitutes a definite risk. Sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement in control subjects should therefore be performed only in centres where the safety of the procedure has been established, and the presence of chronic pancreatitis should be excluded beforehand. Cannulation of the pancreatic duct should be avoided. Manometry can be safely performed, however, as an outpatient procedure.

Intrahepatic pressure measurement: not an accurate reflection of portal vein pressure

Previous studies have established the reliability of percutaneous portal venous pressure measurement using a Chiba needle, a procedure requiring fluoroscopic guidance. Intrahepatic pressure has been advocated by some as a simple and safe index of portal venous pressure. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of intrahepatic pressure measurement and its relationship to portal venous pressure. Fifty patients requiring liver biopsy were included: 29 with cirrhosis (n = 20 micronodular, n = 9 macronodular) and 21 with various hepatic disorders but no cirrhosis. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, using a Chiba needle connected to a manometer by a saline-filled catheter. Immediately prior to biopsy, each patient underwent measurement of: (i) 3 to 5 separate intrahepatic pressures, the intraparenchymal site being inferred by the lack of blood or bile return; and (ii) portal and hepatic venous pressures, the intravascular position of the needle being ascertained by the reflux of blood and the vessel identified with injection of contrast. Intrahepatic pressure measurements showed great intraindividual variability (variation coefficient up to 115%). Mean intrahepatic pressure (13.19 +/- 8.32 mm Hg) was similar to portal venous pressure (14.43 +/- 6.10 mm Hg) in the noncirrhotics but significantly lower in the cirrhotics (intrahepatic pressure = 18.34 +/- 8.82 mm Hg, portal venous pressure = 22.52 +/- 9.47 mm Hg; p less than 0.01). The difference between these two parameters exceeded 3 mm Hg in 50% of patients (mean = 9 mm Hg, range = 4 to 19 mm Hg), both in cirrhotics and noncirrhotics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)