Reduced-dose bevacizumab vs. standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: Which one is better? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Based on the effective radiological responses, bevacizumab (BEV) has been widely used in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma. Although the current standard dose is 5 mg/kg/week, the optimal dosage of BEV is controversial, as few dose-response studies have been performed in recent years. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the value of reduced-dose bevacizumab versus standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma treatment.

METHODS

Three major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible documents published before February 2020. Literature on low-dose bevacizumab versus conventional dose in progressive high-grade glioma was included, and the endpoints of eligible researches should be progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). All available data were collected and then analyzed with Stata software.

RESULTS

Four cohort studies were evaluated, including 552 patients (reduced-dose BEV group: 257, standard-dose BEV group: 295). Low dose BEV seems to slightly improve survival compared to conventional dose as HR < 1 indicates a protective effect, but no significant differences in OS (HR 0.77; 95 % CI 0.53-1.10; P = 0.151) and PFS (HR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.37-1.20; P = 0.175) were found between the two groups in this study.

CONCLUSION

Reduced-dose bevacizumab schedule resulted in similar OS and PFS to standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma, with less side effects and less cost of treatment. Therefore, low-dose bevacizumab represents a promising therapeutic option for recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm our results.

ENDOCRINOLOGY IN THE TIME OF COVID-19: Clinical management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)

In viral pandemics, most specifically Covid-19, many patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), including phaeochromocytomas, paragangliomas and medullary thyroid carcinoma, may develop Covid-19 in a mild or severe form, or be concerned about the influence of viral infection relative to their anti-tumoral therapy. In general, newly presenting patients should be assessed, and patients recently receiving chemotherapy, targeted therapy or radionuclide therapy, or showing tumour growth, should be closely followed. For previously diagnosed patients, who have indolent disease, some delay in routine follow-up or treatment may not be problematic. However, patients developing acute secretory syndromes due to functional neuroendocrine neoplasms (such as of the pancreas, intestine or lung), phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas, will require prompt treatment. Patients with life-threatening Covid-19-related symptoms should be urgently treated and long-term anti-tumoral treatments may be temporarily delayed. In patients with especially aggressive NENs, a careful judgement should be made regarding the severity of any Covid-19 illness, tumour grade, and the immunosuppressant effects of any planned chemotherapy, immunotherapy (e.g. interferon-alpha), targeted therapy or related treatment. In other cases, especially patients with completely resected NENs, or who are under surveillance for a genetic disorder, a telephone or delayed consultation may be in order, balancing the risk of a delay against that of the possible development of Covid-19.

Prostate Cancer Pathology: Recent Updates and Controversies

Prostate cancer is common, and recent efforts in clinical management have focused on identifying patients who could be candidates from less aggressive management or who could benefit from more aggressive therapy. As prostate cancer histology, especially Gleason score, plays a critical role in predicting patient outcomes, attempts have been made to refine histologic classification and reporting in prostate cancer to facilitate patient risk stratification. This review discusses recent updates in prostate cancer grading and reporting.

Competitive Testing of the WHO 2010 versus the WHO 2017 Grading of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Data from a Large International Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) modified the grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from a three-tier (WHO-AJCC 2010) to a four-tier system by introducing the novel category of NET G3 (WHO-AJCC 2017).

OBJECTIVES

This study aims at validating the WHO-AJCC 2017 and identifying the most effective grading system.

METHOD

A total of 2,102 patients were enrolled; entry criteria were: (i) patient underwent surgery; (ii) at least 2 years of follow-up; (iii) observation time up to 2015. Data from 34 variables were collected; grading was assessed and compared for efficacy by statistical means including Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C statistics, and Royston's explained variation in univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

In descriptive analysis, the two grading systems demonstrated statistically significant differences for the major category sex but not for age groups. In Cox regression analysis, both grading systems showed statistically significant differences between grades for OS and EFS; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two G3 classes of WHO-AJCC 2017. In multivariable analysis for the two models fitted to compare efficacy, the two grading systems performed equally well with substantially similar optimal discrimination and well-explained variation for both OS and EFS. The WHO-AJCC 2017 grading system retained statistically significant difference between the two G3 classes for OS but not for EFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO-AJCC 2017 grading system is at least equally performing as the WHO-AJCC 2010 but allows the successful identification of the most aggressive PanNET subgroup. Grading is confirmed as probably the most powerful tool for predicting patient survival.

Variability in Outcomes for Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 7, International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Group 2-3) and Implications for Risk Stratification: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Optimal management for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Clinical metrics provide guidance on appropriate management options.

OBJECTIVE

To report estimates for clinically relevant outcomes in men with IR PCa based on clinical and pathological features.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and programs from key 2015 uro-oncology congresses were searched using the terms "intermediate", "Gleason 3 + 4", "Gleason 4 + 3", "active surveillance", "treatment", "adverse pathology", AND "prostate cancer." Articles meeting prespecified criteria were retrieved. Bibliographies were scanned for additional relevant references.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Men with IR PCa have a wide range of predicted clinically relevant outcomes. Within the IR category, estimate ranges for adverse surgical pathology and 5-yr disease progression are 15-64% and 21-91%, respectively. Clinical parameters and predictive nomograms refine these estimates, but do not uniformly differentiate favorable and unfavorable IR PCa. Variations in study design and data quality in source manuscripts mandate caution in interpreting results.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in IR PCa are heterogeneous. Refinements in personalized risk assessment are needed to better select IR PCa patients for surveillance.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Current and future risk stratification tools may provide additional information to identify men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who may consider active surveillance.

Testosterone Levels Correlate With Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer: Another Step Toward Personalized Medicine

BACKGROUND

Controversial results have shown a significant association with either low or high total testosterone (tT) levels and high risk prostate cancer (PCa). We tested the relationship between circulating tT and grade group 5 (G5) PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with preoperative low- to intermediate-risk disease.

METHODS

Serum sex hormones were assessed the day before RP in a cohort of 846 patients with low- to intermediate-risk PCa. Patients were segregated using the new 5-tiered Gleason grade groups. Restricted cubic spline functions and logistic regression analyses tested the association between sex hormones and G5 PCa. Differences in potential predictive accuracy (PA) were assessed for tT and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 men (3.2%) had G5 PCa at RP, and this group had higher PSA values than patients with G1-G4 PCa (P = 0.02). The groups did not differ in terms of preoperative mean hormonal values. Both low and high circulating tT values depicted a nonlinear U-shaped correlation with G5 PCa at RP. The lowest and highest (10th and 90th percentiles) tT values and biopsy PCa grade emerged as multivariable independent predictors of G5 PCa at RP (all P < 0.05). PA for G5 PCa did not differ between tT (area under the curve [AUC] 0.631) and PSA (AUC 0.636).

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating tT was a significant predictor of G5 PCa at RP in patients with preoperative low- to intermediate-risk disease. Preoperative tT and PSA values showed similar PA for the most aggressive disease, confirming a potential role for circulating androgens in preoperative risk assessment of PCa patients. Prostate 77:234-241, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Trends in Gleason scores of Chinese prostate carcinoma from 1995 to 2014]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the changing trends in Gleason score (GS) of Chinese prostate carcinoma (PCa) from January 1995 to December 2014.

METHODS

In the study, 875 patients admitted to hospital from January 1995 to December 2004 (1995-2004) and from January 2005 to December 2014 (2005-2014) were divided into two groups. The mean levels and proportions of GS, primary and secondary grades were studied. The patients were divided into four groups according to age: <60, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years. Types of specimen included needle biopsy (NB), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and radical prostatectomy (RP). Histological types were made up by acinar carcinoma and other types (including atrophic, pseudohyperplastic, foam, signet ring cell and ductal carcinoma, and so on). The total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) involved groups of <20.0 μg/L and ≥20.0 μg/L. We observed the mean levels and proportions of GS in age, types of specimen, histological types and total prostate-specific antigen in different periods, and used SPSS 17.0 software for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with 1995-2004, the mean levels of GS, primary and secondary grades decreased 0.32 (P=0.003), 0.19 (P=0.001) and 0.12 (P=0.016) in 2005-2014, respectively. The proportions of ≤6 in GS increased 10.9% (P=0.003), and ≥8 decreased 14.0% (P<0.001). The difference of GS 7 was not statistically significant. In the primary grade, the ratio of grades≤3 increased 12.8% (P=0.001), and grade 4 decreased 7.4% (P=0.037), grade 5 decreased 5.5% (P=0.007). The ratio of secondary grades ≤3 increased 7.6% (P=0.037). The difference of grades 4 and 5 was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

GS in Chinese patients with PCa showed a downward trend, which is one of the notable features in the past 20 years in China. The types of specimen and age are important factors in GS, while the histological types and tPSA have less impact on the GS.

Prognostic grading after complete resection for thymic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Despite the World Health Organization (WHO) and Masaoka classifications have been widely accepted as the main describers of prognosis determinants in thymic malignancies, so far, these have been considered independently from one another. We have reviewed our single-centre 40-year results after surgical treatment of thymic malignancies evaluating the inter-relationships between the clinical, surgical and pathological variables and investigating their prognostic impact in completely resected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A surgical series of 347 patients was reviewed and, of these, 305 with complete resection enrolled. Long-term and disease-free survival (LTS, DFS) analyses were performed. Kaplan-Meir curves for WHO histotypes and Masaoka-stages were inspected and matched with the log-rank test; the Cox regression analysis was adopted in a multivariable approach.

RESULTS

Considered independently, the WHO-histotypes did not differentiate clearly from one to another in terms of LTS and DFS; however, types A-AB-B1-B2 and B3-C clustered in 2, statistically different, malignancy groups (LTS, DFS: Cox-p < 0.001). Masaoka staging was confirmed to be a relevant prognostic determinant, even if no evident difference between stages I vs II and stages III vs IV emerged when the Masaoka-classification was factored in. Thus, when investigating 13 surgical and pathological factors of invasiveness, these showed a clustering in 2 groups according to the presence/absence of pathological proven infiltration in the peri-thymic structures (LTS, DFS: Cox-p < 0.001). By matching the WHO-malignancy clusters and infiltration clusters, 4 classes may be identified, which proved to have a distinct prognostic significance: (LTS-Cox: stage-I vs stage-II, p = 0.003; III: p < 0.001, IV: p < 0.001; DFS-Cox: stage-I vs stage-II, p < 0.001; III: p < 0.001; IV: p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When analyzing the long-term outcome of patients underwent complete resection for thymic malignancies, the combination between pathological and surgical variables showed accurate prognosis predictability.

Changing trends in well differentiated thyroid carcinoma over eight decades

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of well differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is rising in the USA. The objective of this study is to present the changes in incidence, presentation, management and outcomes of WDTC within our institution over the past 8 decades.

METHODS

2797 patients managed between 1932 and 2005 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were identified from our institutional database.

RESULTS

There has been an increase in the number of patients managed per decade. Although the median age was 45 years, patients managed post-1985 were more likely to be over 45 years (53% versus 44%, p < 0.001). The percentage of women increased from 68% to 72% (p = 0.026), and the percentage of papillary carcinomas also increased, from 78% to 92%, p < 0.001. An increase in early stage tumors was observed with pT1 lesions increasing from 19% to 48%. Patients in the latter cohort were less likely to have thyroid lobectomy (29% versus 72%, p < 0.001). There was a significant change in the use of RRA, with 8% of the early versus 44% of the latter group receiving post-operative RRA (p < 0.001). Since the introduction of risk group stratification disease specific survival (DSS) has not changed significantly. With a median follow up of 90 months, 10 year DSS rates were below 90% in the cohort managed prior to the 1970s, which rose to >95% thereafter (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with earlier stage disease present an increasing workload for surgical oncologists. Excellent outcomes remain unchanged despite increasingly aggressive surgical and medical management.