Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the MP1000 surgical system with the da Vinci Si robot system in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) through a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 62 patients who were scheduled to undergo RAPN were randomly assigned to either the da Vinci Si robot or MP1000 group. A noninferiority test was conducted with a noninferior intermediate value of 10%. The study compared installation and operation times, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, postoperative surgical margin, rate of conversion to open surgery, eGFR level, complications, and other safety indicators between the two groups.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed without the need for conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery, and no major complications were observed during the process. The test of noninferiority was achieved. There were no significant differences in median installation time, operation time, complication rate at 3 months, rate of positive surgical margin, and eGFR level at 3 months between the groups. Additionally, no evidence of recurrence was found on imaging in both groups. No difference in National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index results for ergonomic considerations. A limitation of this study was its small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The MP1000 system is a suitable platform for RAPN with safety and effectiveness compared with da Vinci Si system.

Clips Can be Safely Used for Vascular Control of the Renal Vessels During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience using clips to control the renal vessels during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and determine the safety of this practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent LDN at our centre January 1, 2007-September 17, 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of complication associated with vascular control of the renal vessels, which included (1) conversion to open to manage bleeding, (2) additional procedures for bleeding, and (3) major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included the rate of renal artery/vein clip dislodgement or crossing, change in hemoglobin, warm ischemia time and the incidence of intra-operative complications and postoperative in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

We included 503 patients who underwent LDN, of which 497 were left sided. The main renal artery was controlled with 3 titanium clips in 489 (97%) cases. The main renal vein was controlled with 2 polymer-locking clips in 478 (95%) cases. For our primary outcome, there were no conversions to open to manage bleeding, no secondary procedures due to bleeding and no major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Additionally, there were no donor deaths. Regarding our secondary outcomes, there were 5 intraoperative events related to the titanium clips being placed on the renal artery and 1 intraoperative event related to the polymer-locking clips on the renal vein, none of which resulted in any morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Using 3 titanium clips on the renal artery and 2 polymer-locking clips on the renal vein during left LDN is safe and provides excellent vascular control.

Effect of 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Models for Surgical Planning of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Planning complex operations such as robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy requires surgeons to review 2-dimensional computed tomography or magnetic resonance images to understand 3-dimensional (3-D), patient-specific anatomy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine surgical outcomes for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy when surgeons reviewed 3-D virtual reality (VR) models during operative planning.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. Ninety-two patients undergoing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy performed by 1 of 11 surgeons at 6 large teaching hospitals were prospectively enrolled and randomized. Enrollment and data collection occurred from October 2017 through December 2018, and data analysis was performed from December 2018 through March 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned to either a control group undergoing usual preoperative planning with computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging only or an intervention group where imaging was supplemented with a 3-D VR model. This model was viewed on the surgeon's smartphone in regular 3-D format and in VR using a VR headset.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was operative time. It was hypothesized that the operations performed using the 3-D VR models would have shorter operative time than those performed without the models. Secondary outcomes included clamp time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (58 men [63%]) with a mean (SD) age of 60.9 (11.6) years were analyzed. The analysis included 48 patients randomized to the control group and 44 randomized to the intervention group. When controlling for case complexity and other covariates, patients whose surgical planning involved 3-D VR models showed differences in operative time (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.37-2.70; estimated OR, 2.47), estimated blood loss (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.04-3.78; estimated OR, 4.56), clamp time (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.79-3.23; estimated OR, 11.22), and length of hospital stay (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.59-5.14; estimated OR, 5.43). Estimated ORs were calculated using the parameter estimates from the generalized estimating equation model. Referent group values for each covariate and the corresponding nephrometry score were summed across the covariates and nephrometry score, and the sum was exponentiated to obtain the OR. A mean of the estimated OR weighted by sample size for each nephrometry score strata was then calculated.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This large, randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients whose surgical planning involved 3-D VR models had reduced operative time, estimated blood loss, clamp time, and length of hospital stay.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers (1 registration per site): NCT03334344, NCT03421418, NCT03534206, NCT03542565, NCT03556943, and NCT03666104.

Experimental Studies of Nonabsorbable Polymeric Surgical Clips for Use in Urologic Laparoscopy

Objective: This study aimed to compare the stability of the Click'aV^® (Grena^®), Click'aV plus (Grena), and Hem-o-lok^® (Weck^®, Teleflex^®) polymer clips and the evaluation of the clips stability on a complete porcine artery. Materials and Methods: A dynamometer with a custom support and clamp unit was used. The crank gradually increased the tension force being applied on the clip via the suture. Different directions for the application of the force were tested. The highest force before the start of slipping the suture was noted. The procedure was repeated three times for each ligating clip. Results: For transverse stability, the "XL-size" Grena Click'aV Plus required preventing slippage at a greater force compared to the Hem-o-lok (p = 0.0071). No significant differences found statistically between the Grena Click'aV and Hem-o-lok clips (p = 0.1). For longitudinal stability, the Hem-o-lok required a significantly higher force to be opened compared to the Click'aV (p = 0.0036), but no statistically significant difference was found compared to the Click'aV Plus (p = 0.1). Concerning porcine artery stability, the artery slipped through the Click'aV clip in both measurements at a force of 10.2 and 9.4 N. In contrast, the arteries were cut in all measurements using the Click'aV Plus and the Hem-o-lok clips at forces of 11.8 and 12.8 N and 12.9 and 14.2 N, respectively. None of the clips leaked with up to 300 mm Hg of intra-arterial pressure applied to porcine renal arteries. Conclusions: The Grena Click'aV Plus clip has similar performance to the Hem-o-lok clip, and this clip can be equally useful for ligating vessels in laparoscopic urologic surgeries. We believe, from our findings in this study as well as those from other reports, that vascular clips applied properly by experienced surgeons provide a safe, reliable, and considerable cost-saving option for vascular control in urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Staplers or clips?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vessel controlling devices for renal pedicle ligation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Controlling of the renal vessels is a critical step in live donor nephrectomy (LDN). Currently, mainly 2 devices, Hem-o-Lok clips and staplers, are utilized to control vessels during LDN. Both of them have advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to compare the safety and the efficacy of the 2 devices and to identify the better one in LDN. A systematic search for related publications in the databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through February 2018 was performed. Eight studies were selected and evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis result showed that utilization of Hem-o-Lok clips resulted in greater amount of estimated blood loss (mean differences [MD]: 40.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.37-75.84) and longer time of warm ischemia (WIT) (MD: 55.61; 95% CI 36.79-74.43) than using staplers. Residual vascular length of grafts in clip group was longer than that in stapler group (MD: 2.51; 95% CI 0.78-4.24). However, the differences in primary outcomes such as device failure rate, death rate, and severe hemorrhage rate, were not significant between these 2 groups. In addition, utilization of Hem-o-Lok clips costed approximate $400 lower than staplers per patient.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that Hem-o-Lok clips and staplers have the similar function in LDN renal ligation, regarding the device failure rate, death rate, and severe hemorrhage rate. However, the surgeons would benefit from the clips in terms of the residue length of vessels, these outstanding features provide operation convenience and flexibility, such as right-sided donor nephrectomies, early vascular bifurcation, and rare vascular variation. In addition, the clips have potential economic advantages. In some developing countries, it would reduce the healthcare expenditure.

Needle in a haystack: lost in transition

A lost needle during minimally invasive surgery is a cause of undue anxiety to the entire surgical team and also causes prolongation of surgical time. There is no literature reporting follow-up of any patient with needle left behind as they are considered as a 'never event' during a surgical procedure. Preventing such events needs vigilance on part of the surgeon and assistant. Here, we report a case of lost needle during performance of a robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery. The robot needed to be de-docked and converted to laparoscopy. After a thorough search, the needle was found to be lodged at an unusual place. A brief review of available literature is also provided alongside.

[LIFTING LAPAROSCOPY IN SIMULTANT SURGERY]

Results of treatment of 84 patients, to whom simultant operative interventions on abdominal, the small pelvis and retroperitoneal organs were performed for concomitant somatic diseases, were analyzed. The author’s technology of laparolifting was applied in 36 patients, and classical technology with carboxyperitoneum adjustment - in 48. Variants of optimal operative accesses were determined, structure and rate of postoperative complications, peculiarities of the early postoperative period course studied. Indisputable advantages of the lifting laparoscopic operations were established, including reduction of the postoperative complications rate and severity, the postoperative pain syndrome intensity, the concurrent chronic diseases exacerbation rate, and postoperative stationary stay.

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with a Remotely Activated Bulldog Clamp in a Pig Model

PURPOSE

Saving warm ischemia time (WIT) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is important. We have designed a new device, a remotely activated bulldog clamp, to facilitate LPN. In present study, the effectiveness, convenience, and safety of the new design device were compared with that of standard bulldog vascular clamp in a pig model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen cases of LPN were bilaterally operated on upper or lower pole of kidneys in five pigs. As the test group, eight cases involved the remotely activated bulldog clamp, whereas the remaining seven cases, as the control group, involved the common standard vascular bulldog clamp. The mean operative time, blood lost, and mean WIT were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and blood lost were not significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05). Continuous artery clamping was used in the two groups. With on-demand clamping, the mean WIT in the test group was 19.0 ± 3.42 minutes, which was significantly less compared with the control group (31.54 ± 5.23 minutes, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly designed device can remotely control the renal artery, which made clamping and unclamping much easier. It is effective and safe in LPN.

EXPERIENCE OF 424 ROBOT-ASSISTED OPERATIONS IN ST-PETERSBURG: RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, PARTIAL AND RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY

The article presents the results of 257 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies, 135 partial nephrectomies and 32 radical nephrectomies at the period from 2010 to 2016. The operations were performed on robotic complex da Vinci S. The mean operative time was 170±50 min, 158,4±72,2 min and 143,3±67,3 min, the mean blood loss was 130±35 ml, 213,0±102,2 ml and 141,4±49,0 ml for robotic radical prostatectomy, partial and radical nephrectomy, respectively. The mean time of warm ischemia consisted of 13,1±2,7 min. Five-year cancer-specific survival rate was 100%, 100% and 98%. The overall survival rate was 97,5%, 87% and 92% for robotic radical prostatectomy, partial and radical nephrectomy, respectively.

Roles of NOTES and LESS in management of small renal masses

INTRODUCTION

Over the last 2 decades, open surgery has been largely displaced by laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of renal masses. Recently, minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), have been developed for such purpose.

METHODS

In the present literature review, the current status of treatment for small renal masses was investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of LESS and NOTES are presented to confirm the feasibility and reproducibility of these techniques.

RESULTS

LESS significantly reduces pain and offers excellent cosmetic outcomes with comparable oncological and perioperative results, and NOTES offers the potential for surgery by various approach without any transcutaneous abdominal incision in management of small renal masses.

CONCLUSION

When the technical limitations are overcome, clinical application of LESS and NOTES is expected to increase. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to clarify the application of these new techniques.

[DELAYED PORT DEPLOYMENT FOR HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY. CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW]

The standard method of surgical treatment of end-stage renal failure is kidney transplantation. A laparoscopic method of organ retrieval from a living donor is currently preferred. The techniques of laparoscopic surgery include hand-assisted nephrectomy and "pure" laparoscopic nephrectomy. We present analysis of the literature data and our own data on the use of the advantages of each of the techniques. A case of complication associated with the use of hand-port from our own practice is described.

Comparison of standard absorbable sutures with self-retaining sutures in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective study of 68 patients

PURPOSE

Although laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been increasingly adopted in the treatment of small localized renal tumor, technical changes remain nowadays. The current study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel QUILLTM Self-Retaining System (SRS) for renorrhaphy during LPN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with kidney neoplasm that accepted LPN at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from July 2010 to March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five patients who received renal sutures with QUILLTM SRS constituted group 1. The control group (group 2) was composed of 33 patients who received standard absorbable Vicryl sutures by the same surgeon. Renorrhaphy was performed in both groups using two layers, with a closure of the deep vessels and collecting system, followed by a running closure of the renal capsule. The demographic and perioperative parameters (gender, laterality of the tumor, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score), estimated blood loss and warm ischemic time (WIT)) were compared between the groups. Risk factors of WIT and blood loss were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Renorrhaphy was successfully completed in both groups. The baseline data of two groups did not differ significantly. Logistic regression analysis showed WIT decreased when the QUILLTM SRS was used (21.8 ± 3.5 min vs. 25.6 ± 4.0 min; ? = -4.109, P < .001). Suture methods were an independent predictor of WIT rather than blood loss (115.7 ± 57.9 mL vs. 137.9 ± 68.5 mL; P = .329).

CONCLUSION

QUILLTM SRS can be effectively and safely used for renorrhaphy during LPN with the potential advantage of shortening WIT.

Mini-laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the use of 3-mm instruments and laparoscope

PURPOSE

To analyze our preliminary outcomes on the use of 3 mm instruments for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN).

METHODS

Our series includes thirteen patients, who underwent LLDN using 3-mm instruments and laparoscope and 5-mm transumbilical trocar. The patients were followed at 7 and 14 days from discharge and were specifically asked about their cosmetic satisfaction. At follow-up, the recipient graft function was controlled, as well as the donor's cosmetic results. Eight months after surgery, all thirteen patients were asked to fill out the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire and Scoring System (PSAQ).

RESULTS

All patients presented good recovery after surgery. Regarding cosmetic outcomes, the donors expressed their satisfaction toward the minimal incision size and optimal esthetic results at 7 and 14 days from discharge home. The low scores on each section of the PSAQ confirmed the favorable outcomes. Early graft function was satisfactory at 1 and 3 months after the kidney transplantation. Furthermore, there were no major complications in the recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our persistent positive results with the use of 3-mm instruments during LLDN support this technique as a good alternative to the standard laparoscopic approach for minimizing the incision site, while maintaining safety and excellent clinical outcomes. The fact that the general laparoscopic standards are maintained could make this approach a very attractive alternative to the other minimally invasive approaches for live donor nephrectomy. The hope is in that the higher degree of satisfaction in the donor population demonstrated in this study may likely enhance living kidney donation.

A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

The idea of performing a laparoscopic procedure through a single abdominal incision was conceived with the aim of expediting postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical feasibility and safety of single-port urologic procedures by using a novel robotic surgical system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a prospective institutional review board-approved, Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term Study (IDEAL) phase 1 study. After enrollment, patients underwent a major urologic robotic single-port procedure over a 3-wk period in July 2010. The patients were followed for 3 yr postoperatively.

INTERVENTION

Different types of urologic surgeries were performed using the da Vinci SP Surgical System. This system is intended to provide the same core clinical capabilities as the existing multiport da Vinci system, except that three articulating endoscopic instruments and an articulating endoscopic camera are inserted into the patient through a single robotic port.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The main outcomes were the technical feasibility of the procedures (as measured by the rate of conversions) and the safety of the procedures (as measured by the incidence of perioperative complications). Secondary end points consisted of evaluating other key surgical perioperative outcomes as well as midterm functional and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study. Eleven of them underwent radical prostatectomy; eight subjects underwent nephrectomy procedures (partial nephrectomy, four; radical nephrectomy, two; and simple nephrectomy, two). There were no conversions to alternative surgical approaches. Overall, two major (Clavien grade 3b) postoperative complications were observed in the radical prostatectomy group and none in the nephrectomy group. At 1-yr follow-up, one radical prostatectomy patient experienced biochemical recurrence, which was successfully treated with salvage radiation therapy. The median warm ischemia time for three of the partial nephrectomies was 38 min. At 3-yr follow-up all patients presented a preserved renal function; none had tumor recurrence. Study limitations include the small sample and the lack of a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the first clinical application of a novel robotic platform specifically designed for single-port urologic surgery. Major urologic procedures were successfully completed without conversions. Further assessment is warranted to corroborate these promising findings.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A novel purpose-built robotic system enables surgeons to perform safely and effectively a variety of major urologic procedures through a single small abdominal incision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02136121).

Simultaneous robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy and standard radical prostatectomy

Recently, patients with urologic malignancies are treated with robot-assisted surgery and the expanded role of robot-assisted surgery includes even those patients with two concomitant primary urologic malignancies. In an effort to further reduce port site-related morbidity, robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (RLESS) has been developed. Therefore, we present herein our early experience and feasibility of simultaneous RLESS partial nephrectomy and standard robotrobot- assisted laparoendoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) on 3 patients with synchronous renal masses and prostate cancer.

Specimen processing during laparoscopic renal surgery: a review of techniques and technologies

Laparoscopic surgery has well-defined benefits for patients and has become accepted over time as a standard access strategy for the management of benign and malignant urologic diseases. Unlike in open surgery, the surgeon is often faced with the additional challenges of specimen retrieval and extraction at the end of laparoscopic extirpative procedures. This final step often requires significant laparoscopic skill to entrap and safely extract the laparoscopic specimens. Failure to apply safe exit steps at the end of a laparoscopic procedure may lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this review is to explore the different techniques and technologies available for laparoscopic kidney retrieval, entrapment and safe extraction.

Robotic partial nephrectomy with selective parenchymal compression (Simon clamp)

OBJECTIVE

To present our initial experience using selective renal parenchymal ischemia, without hilar clamping, in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In four patients with T1a renal tumor we performed robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, using the Simon's clamp (Aesculap). It provides selective parenchymal compression without the need of vascular clamping. All patients had exofitic renal tumors in polar location. Renal parenchymal reconstruction was done as the standard technique.

RESULTS

The median age was 49.6 years (42-59), 3 male and 1 female patient. Median operative time was 71,6 minutes (40-120). Mean stimated bleeding was 250 ml (50-400). Average tumor size was 3,25 cm (1,5-5,3). There were no complications and the average hospital stay was 3,5 days (1-7). The pathology was informed as renal cell carcinoma in three patients and one hemorrhagic cyst. The surgical margins were negative.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results shows that selective renal parenchymal compression, with the Simon's clamp, provides an alternative to vascular control in selected patients with polar renal tumors.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective polar clamping using the simon clamp: initial experience

OBJECTIVE

To report our initial experience in 3 cases of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective parenchymal clamping using a novel laparoscopic clamp.

METHODS

A total of 3 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies were performed using the Simon clamp (Aesculap). Mean patient age was 67 years (range 60 to 74 years), two patients were males. All patients had an ASA score of 2. Mean tumor size was 2.2 cm (range 2 to 2.4 cm) and all tumors were of the lower pole. Two tumors were on the right kidney and one on the left kidney.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 100 minutes (range 70 to 120 min). Mean operative bleeding was 16 ml (range 0 to 50 ml). Mean warm ischemia time of the renal pole was 33 minutes (range 30 to 40 min). All patients were discharged on postoperative day 2. There was no intra or postoperative complications. Surgical margins were negative in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The Simon clamp allows for tumor resection without bleeding and for renal defect repair without collateral renal injury. We hope that in the future the development of other instruments will allow for selective clamping in any tumor location.

Dynamic measuring of physical properties for developing a sophisticated preoperative surgical simulator: how much reaction force should a surgical simulator represent to the surgeon?

The acquisition of physical quantities for a living body in surgery is an important and necessary step toward developing a sophisticated preoperative surgical simulator and its validation and navigation. We have developed a multimodal measuring device that minimizes interference with the movements of the surgeon. We conducted nephrectomy surgery using a laboratory animal and successfully acquired physical quantities. From this experiment, we have acquired the following preliminary result. The surgeon feels a gripping force from -3.5 to 4.4N at the handle of the forceps for dissection. We assume that this data is not far from that of a human.

Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The use of robotic assistance for the partial nephrectomy procedure has emerged as an alternative that may help some of the technical challenges of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The main concerns in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy relates to a steeper 'learning curve', prolonged warm ischaemia times and the potential for postoperative haemorrhage. The article delineates the dynamics of patient preparation, the surgical team, surgical technique & post-operative care to conclude that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to both open and laparoscopic techniques. Partial nephrectomy has shown both improved overall patient survival and more effective preservation of renal function, when compared with radical nephrectomy. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has several potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach. Robotic assistance allows urologists to perform this complex reconstructive procedure more quickly, with improved precision and dexterity, tremor elimination and improved visualization. The present article aims to delineate the dynamics of patient preparation and surgical team, surgical technique and postoperative care. The oncological outcomes and disease-free survival of partial nephrectomy have been found to be equivalent to open partial nephrectomy [1-4].

Evaluation of a minimally invasive renal cooling device using heat transfer analysis and an in vivo porcine model

Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma. This procedure requires temporary occlusion of the renal artery, which can cause irreversible damage due to warm ischemia after 30 min. Open surgical procedures use crushed ice to induce a mild hypothermia of 20°C in the kidney, which can increase allowable ischemia time up to 2.5 h. The Kidney Cooler device was developed previously by the authors to achieve renal cooling using a minimally invasive approach. In the present study an analytical model of kidney cooling in situ was developed using heat transfer equations to determine the effect of kidney thickness on cooling time. In vivo porcine testing was conducted to evaluate the cooling performance of this device and to identify opportunities for improved surgical handling. Renal temperature was measured continuously at 6 points using probes placed orthogonally to each other within the kidney. Results showed that the device can cool the core of the kidney to 20°C in 10-20 min. Design enhancements were made based on surgeon feedback; it was determined that the addition of an insulating air layer below the device increased difficulty of positioning the device around the kidney and did not significantly enhance cooling performance. The Kidney Cooler has been shown to effectively induce mild renal hypothermia of 20°C in an in vivo porcine model.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: looking back, moving forward

This manuscript reviews the history of laparoscopic nephrectomy and addresses the future trends of this minimally invasive operation.

Ex vivo comparison of the tissue effects of six laser wavelengths for potential use in laser supported partial nephrectomy

Laparoscopic/robotic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is increasingly considered for small renal tumors (RT). This demands new compatible surgical tools for RT-resection, such as lasers, to optimize cutting and coagulation. This work aims to characterize ex vivo handling requirements for six medically approved laser devices emitting different light wavelengths (940, 1064, 1318, 1470, 1940, and 2010 nm) amenable for LPN. Incisions were made by laser fibers driven by a computer-controlled stepping motor allowing precise linear movement with a preset velocity at a fixed fiber-tip distance to tissue. Optical parameters were measured on 200 μm tissue slices. Cutting quality depended on power output, fiber velocity and fiber-tip distance to tissue. Contact manner is suitable for cutting while a noncontact manner (5 mm distance) induces coagulation. Ablation threshold differs for each wavelength. Ablation depth is proportional to power output (within limit) while axial and superficial coagulation remains mostly constant. Increased fiber velocity compromises the coagulation quality. Optical parameters of porcine kidney tissue demonstrate that renal absorption coefficient follows water absorption in the 2 μm region while for other spectral regions (900 to 1500 and 1 μm) the tissue effects are influenced by other chromophores and scattering. Tissue color changes demonstrate dependencies on irradiance, scan velocity, and wavelength. Current results clearly demonstrate that surgeons considering laser-assisted RT excisions should be aware of the mentioned technical parameters (power output, fiber velocity and fiber-tip tissue-distance) rather than wavelength only.

Integrating robotic partial nephrectomy to an existing robotic surgery program

INTRODUCTION

As more centers develop robotic proficiency, progressing to a successful robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) program depends on a number of factors. We describe our technique, results, and analysis of program setup for RAPN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2011, 92 RAPNs were performed following maturation of a robotic prostatectomy program. Operating rooms and supply rooms were outfitted for efficient robotic throughput. Tilepro and intraoperative ultrasound were used for all cases. Training and experiential learning for surgeons, anesthesia and nursing staff was a high priority. An onsite robotic technician helped troubleshoot, prepare the room and staff prior to starting surgery, and provide assistance with different robotic models.

RESULTS

Average operative time decreased over time from 235 min to 199 min (p = .03). Warm ischemia time decreased from 26 minutes to 23 minutes (p = .02) despite an increased complexity of tumors and operations on multiple tumors. Median estimated blood loss was 150 mL. Average length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-9). Average size of lesions was 2.7 cm (range 0.7-8.6). Final pathology demonstrated 71 (77%) malignant lesions and 21 (23%) benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy program to an institutional robotic program can be coordinated with several key steps. Outcomes from an operational, oncologic, and renal functional standpoint are acceptable. Despite increased complexity of tumors and treatment of multiple lesions, operative and warm ischemia times showed a decrease over time. An organizational model that involves the surgeons, anesthesia, nursing staff, and possibly a robotic technical specialist helps to overcome the learning curve.

LESS nephrectomy: technique and outcomes

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) represents the next step of laparoscopic surgery and a major advancement towards scarless surgery. LESS radical nephrectomy is an evolving technique based on technological advancement of laparoscopic instruments as well as the refinement of existing techniques.The current report describes LESS nephrectomy technique, presents the experience with the technique in a series of 42 patients and reviews current literature in the field of LESS nephrectomy.

Comparison of video-assisted minilaparotomy, open, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive management of small renal tumors has become more common. We compared the results of partial nephrectomy by video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS), open, and laparoscopic techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared clinicopathological, oncological, and functional outcomes in 271 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal tumors at one institution from 1993 to 2007; including 138 by VAMS, 102 by open, and 31 by laparoscopic technique.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 47.7 ± 29.1 months. No statistically significant differences in the three groups were found in tumor size, tumor location, estimated blood loss, complication rate, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and GFR at last follow-up. Ischemic time was shorter in the open (26.9 min) and VAMS (29.3 min) groups than in the laparoscopic group (31.0 min, p=0.021). Time to normal diet and hospital stay were shorter in the VAMS (1.8 days and 5.4 days) and laparoscopic (1.8 days and 4.7 days) groups than in the open group (2.4 days and 7.3 days, p=0.036 and p<0.001, respectively). Of 180 patients with cancer, positive surgical margins occurred in 2 of 82 patients (2.4%) in the VAMS group, none of 75 patients in the open group, and 3 of 23 patients (13.0%) in the laparoscopic group (p=0.084). In the VAMS, open, and laparoscopic groups, 5-year disease- free survival was 94.8%, 95.8%, and 90.3% (p=0.485), and 5-year cancer-specific survival was 96.3%, 98.6%, and 100%, respectively (p=0.452).

CONCLUSION

Partial nephrectomy using VAMS technique provides surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes similar to open and laparoscopic techniques.

Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: our initial experience

PURPOSE

To report our initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) nephrectomy using a GelPOINT single port and standard laparoscopic instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laparoendoscopic single-site transperitoneal nephrectomy was done for 6 adult patients with a poorly functioning small or hydronephrotic kidney. The procedure was done with the GelPOINT system, which consisted of a wound retractor (Alexis) and GelSeal cap. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used and the renal pedicle was controlled with 10-mm Hem-o-Lok clips.

RESULTS

The participants were 3 men and 3 women with the median age of 29.5 years. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy was successfully done in all the patients without any major complications. Median operation time was 110 minutes (range, 90 to 130 minutes). There was no need for blood transfusion in any patient. The recovery phase was uneventful and all the patients were discharged after a median hospital stay of 2.5 days (range, 2 to 3 days). Renal function remained stable in all the patients after the operation. The incision site healed well on postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience with LESS nephrectomy was successful with the use of a GelPOINT single port and standard laparoscopic instruments. This report may remove barriers to further work with the LESS technique and may offer a strategy to help surgeons gain experience with this novel technology.

[The use of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips during laparoscopic nephrectomy. The intra- and postoperative complications of the operation were assessed too.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From April 2011 through November 2011, 19 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies were performed. A preferred method to secure the renal vein was the use of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips. The renal artery was clipped by titanium clips. In five patients an Endo-GIA stapler was used to secure the renal pedicle. All procedures were carried out using a transperitoneal access. The perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications associated with the use of Hem-o-lock clips were observed. The mean procedure time was 202 min. The average blood loss during the operation was 480 ml. No bleeding in the postoperative period was observed. The mean abdominal drain output was 65 ml per day. The mean time to drain removal was 3 days. The average hospital stay was 5-6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the polymeric Hem-o-lock clips is a safe, relatively easy and cheep way to close the renal vein during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Initial clinical experience of simultaneous robot-assisted bilateral partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy

A 62-year-old male patient with prostate cancer and bilateral renal cell carcinoma underwent a simultaneous robot-assisted bilateral partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy. We describe our initial experience of combined operation with a port strategy allowing reuse of ports and surgical considerations because of prolonged pneumoperitoneum.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience

OBJECTIVE

We present the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and compare the outcomes of each technique.

METHODS

Between December 2006 and March 2010, retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) was performed in 23 patients and transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (TLPN) in 26 patients. They were compared regarding surgical technique, operative parameters, postoperative recovery and follow-up data. The 2 approaches used similar operative techniques to control parenchymal bleeding.

RESULTS

The patient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean tumour size was 3.1 cm in the retroperitoneal group and 3.4 cm in the transperitoneal group. The difference was not statistically significant (p: 0.095). The mean operative time was significantly longer in the transperitoneal group (215 vs 185 minutes, p: 0.031). The mean warm ischemia time difference was not statistically significant (25 vs 28 minutes, p: 0.102). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was greater in the transperitoneal group (254 vs 204 cc, p: 0.003). Moreover, the mean hospital stay was 4.1 days in the RLPN and 4.3 days in the TLPN group (p: 0.303) The difference was not statistically significant. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 2 to 35) in the retroperitoneal group and 13 months (range 1 to 36) in the transperitoneal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience has shown that laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe, feasible technique for patients with small exophytic renal tumours. We believe that the decision regarding the approach should be based on the tumor location on the kidney surface.

Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The conventional laparoscopic surgery is now paving way to the new technologies including robotic and laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). We present our updated experience on LESS radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data from patients undergoing LESS-RN in our two institutions were reviewed along with various clinical and pathological parameters.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2011, 42 LESS-RN were performed (right = 22, left = 20) with mean (range) age and BMI of 63.7 (33-86) years and 25.1 (18-38.6) kg/m(2), respectively. In addition to the instruments in the single port, one extra 3-mm needlescopic instrument was required in 19 patients (right = 17, left = 2). In three patients, two additional 5-mm trocars and instruments were required. None required open conversion. The recorded adverse events include one bowel injury (intraoperative closure without the need for stoma), one postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion, one prolonged ileus, and one deep venous thrombosis. The resected specimens revealed pT1a (n = 3), pT1b (n = 33), pT2a (n = 4), and pT3b (n = 2) tumors. The finding of pT3b was incidental rather than planned procedure. None of the patients had positive margins.

CONCLUSION

LESS-RN has proven to be feasible and safe. Beyond cosmesis, further advantages of this approach need to be addressed by randomized trials.

Open or laparoscopic nephrectomy and extracoroporeal repair of complicated renal artery aneurysms: techniques for renal salvage

Renal artery aneurysm is an infrequently seen disease. The most feared symptom is rupture, which is often rapidly fatal. Indications for intervention include size, intractable symptoms and pregnancy. Many cases are managed by endovascular techniques; however, very complex cases often are referred to the urologist. We report our experience with the rarely used technique of renal artery aneurysms repair comprised of nephrectomy, extracorporeal vascular reconstruction with aneurysmectomy, and autotransplant.

Nephron-sparing surgery for clear cell carcinoma in a solitary functional kidney. Case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of nephron-sparing surgery, patients with small renal masses and diseases affecting overall renal function have greatly benefited.

CLINICAL CASE

We present the case of a 62-year-old male with a 6-cm left renal tumor in the medial parahilar segment with right renal unit functionally excluded, secondary to chronic obstruction due to ureteral lithiasis. Right ureteroscopy was performed with pneumatic lithotripsy. Despite localization and size of the tumor, left nephron-sparing surgery was performed in order to preserve renal function. Follow-up of the patient demonstrates no tumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Open nephron-sparing surgery has been the standard treatment for small renal masses with peripheral localization; however, in specific cases with deteriorated renal function and tumors >5 cm close to the renal hilum, certain risk must be taken in order to perform this procedure that has proven to be highly effective in preserving renal function. Open nephron-sparing surgery represents a highly effective procedure in small renal masses with a nonfunctional contralateral kidney.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a decade of evolution

The detection of renal tumors is increasing with the widespread use of ultrasonography and CT. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) offers less pain, smaller scars, and shorter convalescence. Expanded indications of LPN include larger and more complex tumors, including those in hilar or central locations, multiple tumors, solitary kidneys, and patients with previous renal surgery. This procedure is in constant evolution. We describe the technical nuances of LPN over the past decade of evolution.

A robotics-based flat-panel ultrasound device for continuous intraoperative transcutaneous imaging

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has become more and more popular in the last decade. Video laparoscopes remain the gold standard of intraoperative imaging during laparoscopic interventions. However, providing only superficial images of the target tissue. In contrast, ultrasound (US) imaging may offer crucial information of the interior of the target tissue that could improve surgical outcome. In this paper, we propose a new concept and prototype system to manipulate an US-probe during laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. Our primary goal was to provide the surgeon with US-images during the intervention in real-time. The prototype system consists of three components: a conventional US-machine, a manipulator to guide the US-probe, and a joystick console to control the manipulator. The results of our experiments show that the concept is feasible for US-imaging during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), an attempt to further enhance the cosmetic benefits of minimally invasive surgery while minimizing the potential morbidity associated with multiple incisions, has been developed recently. Our aim was to compare LESS simple nephrectomy (LESS-SN) and conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (CTL-SN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized study that was conducted between December 2008 and September 2009, 27 patients who needed simple nephrectomy were randomized to either LESS-SN or CTL-SN. All procedures in both groups were performed by the first author, who is experienced in laparoscopic surgery. Patient characteristics, perioperative details, and time to return to work were recorded. Postoperative evaluation of pain and use of analgesic medication were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference in median operative time (117.5 vs 114 min, P = 0.52), blood loss (50.71 vs 47.15 mL, P = 0.60), transfusion rates (0% for both), and hospitalization time (2.07 vs 2.11 days, P = 0.74) between the LESS-SN and CTL-SN groups. Time to return to normal activities was shorter in the LESS-SN group compared with the CTL-SN group (10.7 vs 13.5 days, P = 0.001). Both the visual analogue scale and the postoperative use of analgesics were significantly lower during postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 in patients who underwent LESS-SN, compared with patients who underwent CTL-SN. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in both groups. Compared with CTL-SN, LESS-SN was more expensive, but all patients undergoing LESS-SN were very pleased with the cosmetic outcome (no visible scars).

CONCLUSION

The early experience described in this study suggests that LESS-SN is a safe and effective alternative to CTL-SN that provides surgeons with a minimally invasive surgical option and the ability to hide the surgical incision within the umbilicus; however, a larger series is necessary to confirm these findings and to determine if there are any benefits in pain, recovery, or cosmesis.

First Italian experience in single-incision laparoscopic nephrectomy

We describe our laparoscopic nephrectomy technique of placing trocars directly on the fascia once the skin and the subcutaneous layers are prepared. A series of 10 consecutive patients were operated on by single-incision laparoscopic nephrectomy (SILN). With a 5-cm mean skin incision, the fascia was prepared and 3/4 trocars inserted separately directly on the fascia. Surgical strategy followed the standard technique, except for the use of articulating instruments and 5-mm optic. Demographics, body mass index (BMI), operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, transfusions, hemoglobin decrease, analgesic requirement, length of stay, and final pathology were recorded. Postoperative and prior-to-discharge visual analogue scale (VAS) pain evaluations were also collected, together with the limitations inherent in the instruments' placement and parallel driving during the procedure. The procedures were successfully completed in all but one case. The mean operative time was 169 min. (mean blood loss 113 ml). Without major perioperative complications, the patients were discharged early (mean 5.3 days). Four patients had a BMI>30. For specimen retrieval (neoplasms) two trocar holes were joined. One patient required analgesics; the mean post-operative and prior-to-discharge VAS scores were 5.7 and 1.4, respectively. Pathology examination confirmed 4 pyelonephritic kidneys, 4 renal carcinomas, and 2 upper-urinary tract carcinomas. The laparoscopic nephrectomy via a single incision is feasible and safe, with favorable perioperative and short-term outcomes. It's technically more challenging than standard laparoscopy requiring advanced surgical skills.

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) adrenalectomy and partial nephrectomy: current Italian experience with two challenging surgical procedures

Since its initial clinical use in urology, there has been an increasing enthusiasm and a growing interest for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Several clinical series have been reported with an estimated cumulative clinical experience of more than four hundred so far. Nowadays, virtually all extirpative and reconstructive urological procedures have been described and shown to be feasible and safe, including advanced reconstructive procedures and major extirpative ones. Among them, adrenalectomy and partial nephrectomy represent highly complex procedures. Initial clinical data have been recently reported to test the safety and efficacy of these interventions in selected patients. Herein, we describe our initial cases of unclamp LESS partial nephrectomy and adrenalectomy. In our opinion, LESS is an established technique within the field of minimally invasive surgery. Even if further studies are needed to demonstrate its actual benefits, early clinical outcomes are encouraging and LESS might represent the way to go in minimally invasive urological surgery.

[Nephrectomy through a single trocar incision]

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) is a laparoscopic technique in which a single small incision is made in the umbilicus with the use of a special device (single-port). We report the first nephrectomy performed in Scandinavia using this method. LESS nephrectomy is feasible, but requires a specific training programme comprising theory as well as practice. The authors believe that such training in conjunction with careful patient selection is essential.

Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: endo TA stapler is safe and effective

Although laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now a well-accepted alternative to traditional open donor nephrectomy at many transplantation centers, there are always concerns regarding quality of graft and vessels after laparoscopic harvest, especially with right donor nephrectomy. Several methods of graft retrieval have been explored to achieve acceptable graft outcome. We share our initial experience at the Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Amedabad, India of laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy performed by subcostal open, and pure laparoscopic approach with the use of Endo TA stapler. Nine laparoscopic right donor nephrectomies were performed by the trans-peritoneal approach at our centre from January 2006 to March 2007. In the first five cases, the grafts were retrieved through subcostal incision (Group A) and the last four cases were performed purely laparoscopically by using Endo TA stapler device (Group B). None of the patients needed open conversion. The mean operative time and hospital stay were comparable in each group. The warm ischemia time was longer in pure laparoscopic group (415 seconds) than the subcostal open approach group (176 seconds). The serum creatinine of the recipients on day seven was comparable in both the groups. The recipient surgery was effectively performed with graft retrieved using Endo TA stapler device (Group B) without any compromise to the renal vein length. Our study suggests that the Endo TA stapler device is safe and provides all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to the donor.

Lack of visual endoscopic appearance of ureteropelvic urothelial cancer; is it a deterrence for nephroureterectomy? A case study and literature review

Two case reports are presented with an important question what should be done when an endoscopic appearance of the urotherial lesion is unavailable. As seen in clinical practice, many patients choose nephroureterectomy with frequent follow up procedures. The other question raised is that what should be done when the lesions are ureteroscopically inaccessible. These patients can avail the advantages of radical treatment without accepting the probable as initial form of treatment to evade the risk and detriments of unnecessary additional endoscopic procedures.

Haemostasis in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Current status

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is increasingly performed all over the world. However, as in its open counterpart, achieving a satisfactory haemostasis may be challenging. Our goal is to describe the different methods employed to control bleeding during LPN. We performed a non-structured review of the literature on the different haemostatic methods used during LPN. The techniques and materials used are divided into two main groups: LPN with ischemia and LPN without ischemia. The techniques to achieve warm, cold and regional ischemia are described. Energy sources and sealants are discussed in the section on LPN without ischemia. Case selection is of capital importance in the choice the appropriate haemostatic tools for LPN. Some refinements, related to the nature of the laparoscopic procedure, are still required to reach an effective cold ischemia. A broad variety of energy sources have been tested in animal models and in human setting. Major disadvantages are tissue scarring, smoke creation and low progression speed. To date none has been demonstrated to be superior to the conventional suturing. Fibrin and thrombin promoters as bio-glues are an important adjuvant method during LPN. Bipolar current devices together with fibrin sealants or coagulation promoters are used in small peripheral tumors. In bigger or central tumors, additionally suturing over Surgicel bolsters, the most popular technique is to secure the suture by means of clips. The level of the recommendations is based on comparative cohorts. We conclude that haemostasis is achieved during LPN adapting the protocols used in open nephron sparing surgery to the laparoscopic approach. Renal ischemia and bolster sutures are still mandatory in complicated LPN while in case of small exophytic tumors a satisfactory haemostasis may be achieved by using only a sealant product.

Current role of robotic assisted partial nephrectomy

The modern urologists are nowadays greatly involved in the surgical management of small renal masses, where nephron sparing surgery showed adequate oncological results, with a saving of a great amount of healthy renal tissue. Among the various minimally invasive surgical options, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy duplicates the open technique considered the standard of referral. Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy, aims to add to laparoscopy all the well known advantages offered by the Da Vinci system, such as the 3-Dvision and 7 degree of freedom of surgical instruments. We reviewed the current English literature on robotic partial nephrectomy published in 2008-2009 with at least 20 cases, adding our experience of 26 cases. Although the retroperitoneoscopic approach showed to be feasible in selected cases, all the procedures reported were performed with a transperitoneal approach. Among the 106 robotic assisted partial nephrectomy procedures selected, the mean tumor diameter was 2.8 cm; the mean operative time was 148.7 min with a mean warm ischemia time of 23.8 min and the positive surgical margins rate was 1.8%, reflecting the learning curve of the procedure. Overall complications rate was 15%, although the majority were minor and conservatively treated. Although robotic partial nephrectomy is still in its infancy, it showed adequate overall results when compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with similar results but with a reduced learning curve. Actually robotic partial nephrectomy should be considered a viable option for nephron sparing surgery both in experienced laparoscopy centers for larger lesions in robotic naive centers where it may become the standard option for the treatment of small renal masses.

Yonsei experience in robotic urologic surgery-application in various urological procedures

PURPOSE

The da Vinci robot system has been used to perform complex reconstructive procedures in a minimally invasive fashion. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has recently established as one of the standard cares. Based on experience with the robotic prostatectomy, its use is naturally expanding into other urologic surgeries. We examine our practical pattern and application of da Vinci robot system in urologic field.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Robotic urologic surgery has been performed during a period from July 2005 to August 2008 in a total of 708 cases. Surgery was performed by 7 operators. In our series, radical prostatectomy was performed in 623 cases, partial nephrectomy in 43 cases, radical cystectomy in 11 cases, nephroureterectomy in 18 cases and other surgeries in 15 cases.

RESULTS

In the first year, robotic urologic surgery was performed in 43 cases. However, in the second year, it was performed in 164 cases, and it was performed in 407 cases in the third year. In the first year, only prostatectomy was performed. In the second year, partial nephrectomy (2 cases), nephroureterectomy (3 cases) and cystectomy (1 case) were performed. In the third year, other urologic surgeries than prostatectomy were performed in 64 cases. The first robotic surgery was performed with long operative time. For instance, the operative time of prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, cystectomy and nephroureterectomy was 418, 222, 340 and 320 minutes, respectively. Overall, the mean operative time of prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, cystectomy and nephrourectectomy was 179, 173, 309, and 206 minutes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience at a single-institution, robot system can be used both safely and efficiently in many areas of urologic surgeries including prostatectomy. Once this system is familiar to surgeons, it will be used in a wide range of urologic surgery.