Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Gas vs Saline Tissue Expanders: Does the Fill Type Matter?

The most common reconstruction technique following mastectomy is a 2-stage technique that involves tissue expansion followed by definitive implant-based reconstruction (IBR). Tissue expanders (TEs) have classically used saline for initial fill; however, TEs with an initial gas fill (GTE)-including the CO2-based AeroForm (AirXpanders, San Francisco, CA) TE and TEs initially filled with atmospheric air-have been increasingly used in the past decade. We aimed to compare the outcomes in breast reconstruction for tissue expanders initially filled with saline vs gas. PubMed was queried for studies comparing gas- and saline-filled tissue expanders (STEs) used in IBR. A meta-analysis was performed on major postoperative outcomes and the required expansion and definitive reconstruction time. Eleven studies were selected and included in the analysis. No significant differences existed between tissue expansion with GTEs vs STEs for 11 of the 13 postoperative outcomes investigated. Out of the complications investigated, only the risk of infection/cellulitis/abscess formation was significantly lower in the GTE cohort (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.82; P = .0009). The time to definitive reconstruction was also significantly lower in the GTE cohort (mean difference [MD], 45.85 days; 95% CI, -57.80 to -33.90; P < .00001). The total time to full expansion approached significance in the GTE cohort (MD, -20.33 days; 95% CI, -41.71 to 1.04; P = .06). A cost analysis considering TE cost and infection risk determined that GTE use saved a predicted $2055.34 in overall healthcare costs. Surgical outcomes for both fill types were predominantly similar; however, GTEs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of postoperative infection compared to saline-filled TEs. GTEs could also reduce healthcare expenditures and require less time until definitive reconstruction after placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion

BACKGROUND

Tissue expanders represent one of the main surgical options for skin reconstruction in cases of tumors, traumalike burn injury, scar contracture, and alopecia. However, the tissue expander device is also associated with complications such as infection and extrusion. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for major complications of use of tissue expanders in pediatric patients using multivariate analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center observational study was performed over 10 years in pediatric patients who were treated with tissue expanders for tumors, nevus, scars, burn reconstruction, and alopecia from April 2012 to March 2022. The primary outcome was overall complications per operation and expander, including infection and extrusion. Ten predictor variables were included as risk factors based on previous studies and as new factors considered important from clinical experience. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for major complications such as expander infection or extrusion.

RESULTS

The study included 44 patients who underwent 92 operations using 238 tissue expanders. The overall complication rate per expander was 14.3%. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified associations of younger age, number of expanders used per operation, history of infection, and tissue expander locations with a higher complication rate. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, younger age (odds ratio, 1.14; P = 0.043) was associated with a high likelihood of expander complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age is an independent risk factor for tissue expander complications in pediatric patients. This factor should be considered in preoperative planning and discussions with the patient's family.

Early Complications in Prepectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Prepectoral implant placement for postmastectomy breast reconstruction has increased in recent years. Benefits of prepectoral reconstruction may include lack of animation deformities and reduced postoperative pain, but its complication profile is currently unclear. This study aimed to examine the complication profile of prepectoral tissue expanders (TEs) to determine factors associated with TE loss.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction from January 2018 to June 2021. The decision to use the prepectoral technique was based on mastectomy skin quality and patient comorbidities. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included TE loss, seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, and TE exposure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with TE loss.

RESULTS

The study identified 1225 TEs. The most frequent complications were seroma (8.7%, n = 106), infection/cellulitis (8.2%, n = 101), and TE loss (4.2%, n = 51). Factors associated with TE loss in the univariate analysis included ethnicity, history of smoking, body mass index, mastectomy weight, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate regression analysis, only mastectomy weight had a positive association with TE loss (odds ratio, 1.001; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction can be performed safely with an acceptable early complication profile. The study data suggest that increasing mastectomy weight is the most significant factor associated with TE loss. Further research examining the quality of the soft tissue envelope and assessing patient-reported outcomes would prove beneficial.

Prediction model for haematoma after tissue expander placement: A retrospective cohort study of 7080 cases over 20 years

Haematoma is an early complication of tissue expander placement and can lead to infection, capsule contracture and various complications, hindering successful reconstruction. However, no scientific models can accurately predict the risk of haematoma following tissue expansion. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for haematoma following tissue expander placement. The medical records of patients who underwent expander placement between 2001 and 2021 were obtained from the clinical database of the Department of Plastic Surgery at the Xijing Hospital. A total of 4579 consecutive patients with 7080 expanders and 179 expanded pocket haematomas were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified adult age (P = 0.006), male sex (P < 0.001), scar reconstruction (P = 0.019), perioperative hypertension (P < 0.001), face and neck location (P = 0.002) and activated partial thromboplastin time above the normal range (P < 0.001) as risk factors for haematoma. Therefore, these were included in the prediction model, and a nomogram was constructed. The discrimination of the nomogram was robust (area under the curve: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.83). Further, the prediction model had a strong fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.066) and maintained similar discrimination after considering performance optimism (bootstrapped area under the curve: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.84). This clinical prediction model was created using a generalisable dataset and can be utilised to obtain valid haematoma predictions after expander placement, assisting surgeons in implementing preventive measures or interventions to reduce the occurrence of haematoma.

Complications Following Tissue Expander-Based Reconstruction in Pediatric Burn Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tissue expansion has been widely used to reconstruct soft tissue defects following burn injuries in pediatric patients, allowing for satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes. Factors impacting the success of tissue expander (TE)-based reconstruction in these patients are poorly understood. Herein, we aim to determine the risk factors for postoperative complications following TE-based reconstruction in pediatric burn patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent TE placement for burn reconstruction from 2006 to 2019 was performed. Primary outcomes were major complications (TE explantation, extrusion, replacement, flap necrosis, unplanned reoperation, readmission) and wound complications (surgical site infection and wound dehiscence). Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between primary outcomes, patient demographics, burn characteristics, and TE characteristics was assessed using the chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Of 28 patients included in the study, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 6.5 (3.3-11.8) years, with a follow-up of 12 (7-32) months. The majority were males [n = 20 (71%)], Black patients [n = 11 (39%)], and experienced burns due to flames [n = 78 (29%)]. Eleven (39%) patients experienced major complications, most commonly TE premature explantation [n = 6 (21%)]. Patients who experienced major complications, compared to those who did not, had a significantly greater median (IQR) % total body surface area (TBSA) [38 (27-52), 10 (5-19), P = 0.002] and number of TEs inserted [2 (2-3), 1 (1-2), P = 0.01]. Ten (36%) patients experienced wound complications, most commonly surgical site infection following TE placement [n = 6 (21%)]. Patients who experienced wound complications, compared to those who did not, had a significantly greater median (IQR) %TBSA [35 (18-45), 19 (13-24), P = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

Pediatric burn injuries involving greater than 30% TBSA and necessitating an increasing number of TEs were associated with worse postoperative complications following TE-based reconstruction.

Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs).

METHODS

A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days.Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Impact of Initial Filling Medium on Outcomes of Subpectoral, Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Air versus Saline

BACKGROUND

In two-stage expander-based breast reconstruction, the use of air as the initial filling medium has been suggested to confer clinical advantages over conventional saline, but this has not been demonstrated in a large series. This study aimed to evaluate the association between material type (air versus saline) for initial expander filling and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent immediate, subpectoral, tissue expander-based breast reconstruction between January of 2018 and March of 2021. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the material used for initial filling: saline-inflated expanders, which were used during the first 22 months consecutively, and air-inflated expanders, which were used during the latter 17 months consecutively. Complications including mastectomy flap necrosis and postoperative expansion profiles were compared. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 443 breasts (400 patients), including 161 air-filled and 282 saline-filled breasts, were analyzed. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The air-filled group showed a significantly lower rate of mastectomy flap necrosis; this difference remained significant after adjustment for other variables in the multivariable analysis. The rates of other complications did not differ between the two groups. The air-filled group had fewer office visits and a shorter period to complete expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of air for initial expander filling could provide safe and reliable outcomes with reduced patient discomfort during postoperative expansion; thus, air-filled expanders might be an effective alternative to saline-filled expanders.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Efficacy of Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the utility of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the risk of surgical-site infection between patients receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone versus prolonged postoperative antibiotics within a propensity score-matched cohort.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone were propensity score-matched 1:3 to patients receiving postoperative antibiotics based on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment factors. Incidence of surgical-site infection was compared based on duration of antibiotic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of a total of 431 patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 77.2%. Within this cohort, 348 were included for propensity matching (no antibiotics, 87 patients; antibiotics, 261 patients). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in incidence of infection requiring intravenous (no antibiotics, 6.9%; antibiotics, 4.6%; P = 0.35) or oral antibiotics (no antibiotics, 11.5%; antibiotics, 16.1%; P = 0.16). In addition, rates of unplanned reoperation ( P = 0.88) and 30-day readmission ( P = 0.19) were similar. After multivariate adjustment, prescription of postoperative antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.3; P = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Within a propensity score-matched cohort accounting for patient comorbidities and receipt of adjuvant therapies, prescription of postoperative antibiotics after TE-based breast reconstruction conferred no improvement in rates of TE infection, reoperation, or unplanned health care use. These data underscore the need for multicenter randomized trials on the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis in TE-based breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Textured versus Smooth Tissue Expanders: A Comparison of Complications in 3526 Breast Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Increased understanding of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma has led to a shift away from textured breast devices. A few small studies have compared the complication rates of textured and smooth tissue expanders (TEs). The aim of this study was to compare complication profiles in patients undergoing two-stage postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either textured or smooth TEs.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with textured or smooth TEs from 2018 to 2020 at their institution. Rates of seroma, infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, exposure, and TE loss were analyzed in the overall cohort and subgroups undergoing prepectoral and subpectoral TE placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to decrease the effects of confounders comparing textured and smooth TEs.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed 3526 TEs (1456 textured and 2070 smooth). More frequent use of acellular dermal matrix, SPY angiography, and prepectoral TE placement was noted in the smooth TE cohort ( P < 0.001). Univariate analysis suggested higher rates of infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, and exposure in smooth TEs (all P < 0.01). Rates of TE loss did not differ. After propensity matching, no differences were noted in infection or TE loss. Prepectoral smooth expanders had increased rates of malposition/rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

TE surface type did not affect rates of TE loss, although increased rates of expander malposition were noted in the smooth prepectoral cohort. Further research is needed to examine breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma risk with temporary textured TE exposure to improve decision-making.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCW

Therapeutic, III.

Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Textured implants and expanders are associated with an increased risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). As a result, plastic surgeons are utilizing smooth expanders, but many perceive these produce undesirable outcomes including infection, seroma, and lateral displacement.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of smooth and textured expanders.

METHODS

Breast reconstruction patients from January 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients underwent placement of tissue expanders at the time of mastectomy. Primary outcomes included postoperative seroma, infection, malposition, days to final reconstruction, explantation, and the need for capsulorrhaphy.

RESULTS

In total, 233 patients were reviewed, of whom 167 met both inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in poor outcomes comparing smooth and textured expanders. Days to final reconstruction was lower with smooth expanders per breast (P = .0424). The subpectoral group was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing capsulorrhaphy (P = .004). Prepectoral placement was associated with more seromas (P = .0176) and infections (P = .0245). Demographic factors included older age as a protective factor for undergoing capsulorrhaphy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, P = .038), obesity increased the risk of infection (OR = 5.683, P = .0279) and malposition (OR = 6.208, P = .0222), and radiation was associated with malposition (OR = 3.408, P = .0246).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in poor outcomes between smooth and textured expanders. Patient demographics and anatomical plane placement had greater effects on infection, seroma, and the need for capsulorrhaphy compared with tissue expander texturing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Lower Extremity Pediatric Tissue Expansion: A Single Surgeon's 16-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Tissue expansion is a well-established approach to soft tissue reconstruction in the pediatric population for lower extremity pathologies. Unfortunately, complication rates range from 19% to 40% in literature, including infection and implant extrusion, leading to delays in reconstruction. These challenges have prompted investigation toward categorizing risk factors for lower extremity tissue expander placement.

METHODS

A retrospective study of pediatric patients who underwent lower extremity tissue expander placement by the senior author (R.J.R.) was performed over a 16-year period. Patient charts were reviewed to categorize baseline and operative characteristics. Primary outcome variables were surgical-site infection, expander extrusion, and expander deflation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed ( α < 0.05).

RESULTS

There were 59 tissue expanders in our cohort. The overall complication rate was 27.1% with a 77.2% successful reconstruction rate. Greater number of expanders placed during 1 operation is associated with 2.5 increased odds of having any complication and is associated with 0.4 decreased odds of having a successful reconstruction. Incisions made in scar tissue for expander placement appear to be associated with a greater than 7 times increased odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of soft tissue pathologies using lower extremity tissue expanders in the pediatric population is an effective yet challenging technique. This study identified that the number of expanders inserted during 1 operation, incisions made over scar tissue, and expanders placed in the anterior thigh were correlated with having a negative impact on reconstructive outcomes. Extra care should be taken with patients who require multiple expanders during 1 operation and with choosing the location and incision of expander placement.

Benefits of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Breast Tissue Expansion: Literature Review and Case Series

Breast cancer results in up to 1.6 million new candidates for yearly breast reconstruction (BR) surgery. Two-stage breast reconstruction surgery with the use of a tissue expander (TE) is a common approach to reconstructing the breast after mastectomy. However, a common disadvantage encountered with the traditional breast TE is the magnetic injection port, which has been reported to cause injuries in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Therefore this type of breast TE is labeled "MR unsafe." Recent technological advances have incorporated radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology in the TE to allow for the location of the injection port without magnetic components, resulting in an MR-conditional TE. This paper aims to review the information regarding the safety profile of TEs with magnetic ports and to gather distinct clinical scenarios in which an MR-conditional TE benefits the patient during the BR process. A literature review ranging from 2018 to 2022 was performed with the search terms: "tissue expander" OR "breast tissue expander" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MRI." Additionally, a case series was collected from each of the authors' practices. The literature search yielded 13 recent peer-reviewed papers, and 6 distinct clinical scenarios were compiled and discussed. Most clinicians find MRI examinations to be the state-of-art diagnostic imaging modality. However, due to the preexisting risks associated with TEs with magnetic ports, the MRI labeling classification should be considered when deciding which TE is the most appropriate for the patient requiring MRI examinations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

A Simple Technique Using Peri-Prosthetic Irrigation Improves Implant Salvage Rates in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Background and objectives: Implant-related complications leading to implant loss contribute to major morbidity in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Various techniques have been advocated to improve rates of reconstruction salvage. The objective of our study was to assess if a peri-prosthetic irrigation system was an effective adjunct to the conventional wash-out technique in improving reconstruction salvage rates. Methods: The study included patients who had immediate implant-based breast reconstruction from January 2015 to November 2020. The conventional technique of reconstruction salvage, using debridement, wash-out, and implant/expander exchange with systemic use of antibiotics, was performed for patients undergoing exploration for infection until May 2019. A simple technique using a continuous peri-prosthetic irrigation system with vancomycin (1 g/L normal saline over 24 h) for 2 days was added as an adjunct to the conventional technique. Treatment details and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The study was approved by the Clinical Governance department. Results: During the study period, 335 patients underwent IBR. A total of 65 patients (19.4%) returned to the theatre due to post-operative complications, of which 45 (13.4%) were due to infection. A conventional technique was used in 38 (84.4%) patients, and peri-prosthetic irrigation was used as an adjunct in 7 patients (15.6%). A total of 16 (42.1%) in the conventional group and all 7 (100%) in the irrigation group had successful reconstruction salvage. No patients had complications due to antibiotic irrigation. Conclusions: The peri-prosthetic irrigation system is a simple, safe, and effective adjunct to conventional techniques in improving reconstruction salvage in IBR.

Air versus Saline in Initial Prepectoral Tissue Expansion: A Comparison of Complications and Perioperative Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

One option to optimize prepectoral tissue expander fill volume while minimizing stress on mastectomy skin flaps is to use air as an initial fill medium, with subsequent exchange to saline during postoperative expansion. The authors compared complications and early patient-reported outcomes (PROs) based on fill type in prepectoral breast reconstruction patients.

METHODS

Prepectoral breast reconstruction patients who underwent intraoperative tissue expansion with air or saline from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed to assess fill-type utilization. The primary endpoint was expander loss; secondary endpoints included seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, full-thickness mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, expander exposure, and capsular contracture. PROs were assessed with the BREAST-Q Physical Well-Being of the Chest scale 2 weeks postoperatively. Propensity-matching was performed as a secondary analysis.

RESULTS

Of 560 patients (928 expanders) included in the analysis, 372 had devices initially filled with air (623 expanders), and 188 with saline (305 expanders). No differences were observed for overall rates of expander loss (4.7% versus 3.0%, P = 0.290) or overall complications (22.5% versus 17.7%, P = 0.103). No difference in BREAST-Q scores was observed ( P = 0.142). Utilization of air-filled expanders decreased substantially over the last study year. After propensity matching, no differences in loss, other complications, or PROs were observed across cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue expanders initially filled with air seem to have no significant advantage over saline-filled expanders in maintaining mastectomy skin flap viability or PROs, including after propensity matching. These findings can help guide choice of initial tissue expander fill type.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Wise Pattern versus Transverse Pattern Mastectomy in Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The Wise pattern adapted to mastectomy incisions has become a valuable asset for breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breasts. The authors compared the time for exchange, time to initiate postmastectomy radiotherapy, and complication rates between Wise pattern and transverse incision pattern reconstructions.

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent immediate, two-stage, implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) between January of 2011 and December of 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Two cohorts were compared according to the incision pattern: Wise pattern versus transverse incision pattern. Complications were compared after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The authors initially analyzed 393 two-stage immediate IBBRs in 239 patients [91 IBBRs (23.2%) in the Wise pattern group and 302 (76.8%) in the transverse pattern group]. Expansion time (53 days versus 50 days, P = 0.9), time for tissue expander-to-implant exchange (154 versus 175 days, P = 0.547), and time to initiate postmastectomy radiotherapy (144 days versus 126 days, P = 0.616) were not different between groups. Before propensity score matching, the 30-day rate of wound-related complications (32% versus 10%, P < 0.001) and the 30-day rate of wound complications requiring excision/débridement and closure procedures (20% versus 7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the Wise pattern group. After propensity score matching, the 30-day rate of wound complications was persistently higher (25% versus 10%, P = 0.03) in the Wise pattern group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Wise pattern mastectomy independently increases the incidence of wound-related complications versus only transverse patterns during two-stage IBBR, even after propensity score matching. Delayed tissue expander placement may improve the safety profile of this procedure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

ADM-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Setting: Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on immediate breast reconstruction historically involved a marked increase in complication rate (up to 50%). Prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) has shown promising early postoperative results. This study aims to evaluate PPBR long-term results in PMRT setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective monocentric analysis of 485 PPBR (439 patients) undergoing Acellular-Dermal-Matrix assisted direct-to-implant reconstruction (46 bilateral procedures) between January 2015 and December 2020 (mean FU:35.6 months). Group 1 comprised 401 PPBR not submitted to PMRT, and 84 reconstructions receiving PMRT in Group 2. Patients' characteristics, postoperative complication and revisional surgery rate were examined. PMRT characteristics and subcutaneous tissue thickness, measured in Group 2 by CT scan, were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Long-term complication rate was 11.2% in Group 1 vs. 21.4% in Group 2 (P-value = .019). Capsular contracture represented the only complication associated to a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P-value < .001). In Group 2, only 4.8% implant loss and 8.3% severe capsular contracture rate was found. In patients who underwent PMRT, 38.9% of complications settled with no consequences, and only 4.8% of patients needed revisional surgery in the long-term FU. According to multivariate analysis, drug intake and PMRT were significantly associated with postoperative complications. In Group 2, a thinner subcutaneous tissue was linked to a higher complication risk.

CONCLUSION

In our series, patients treated with PPBR who underwent PMRT, presented a low complication rate and minimal need for revisional surgery in the long-term follow-up, suggesting that this technique is feasible and safe also in PMRT context.

Air or Saline? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on the Effect of Tissue Expander Fill on Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Tissue expander fill medium and volume have implications for the pressure exerted on mastectomy skin flaps. This study evaluated the influence of initial fill medium (air vs. saline) on complications in immediate breast reconstruction within a propensity score-matched cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction with initial intraoperative fill with air were propensity score matched 1:2 to those with saline initial fill based on patient and tissue expander characteristics. Incidence of overall and ischemic complications were compared by fill medium (air vs. saline).

RESULTS

A total of 584 patients were included, including 130 (22.2%) with initial fill with air, 377 (64.6%) with initial fill with saline, and 77 (13.2%) with 0 cc of initial fill. After multivariate adjustment, higher intraoperative fill volume was associated with increased risk of mastectomy skin flap necrosis [regression coefficient (RC) 15.7; p = 0.049]. Propensity score matching was then conducted among 360 patients (Air: 120 patients vs. Saline: 240 patients). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the incidences of mastectomy skin flap necrosis, extrusion, reoperation, or readmission between the air and saline cohorts (all p > 0.05). However, initial fill with air was associated with lower incidence of infection requiring oral antibiotics (p = 0.003), seroma (p = 0.004), and nipple necrosis (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Within a propensity score-matched cohort, initial fill with air was associated with a lower incidence of complications, including ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Initial fill with air and lower fill volumes may be strategies to reducing risk of ischemic complications among high-risk patients.

Seroma After Breast Reconstruction With Tissue Expanders: Outcomes and Management

BACKGROUND

Seroma is a relatively common complication after breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. The main risk in the presence of seroma is development of periprosthetic infection, which can lead to implant loss. Our goals were to identify risk factors for seroma, and to describe our protocol for managing fluid accumulation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An IRB approved breast reconstruction database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent tissue expander reconstruction. Patient characteristics, details of surgery, outcomes and treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen tissue expander reconstructions were performed in 138 patients. Twenty-eight reconstructions developed seroma (12.8%), and 75 were identified to have prolonged drains (34.2%). Seroma was more common in patients with lymph node surgery ( P = 0.043), delayed reconstruction ( P = 0.049), and prepectoral reconstruction ( P = 0.002). Seroma and/or prolonged drains were more commonly noted in patients with higher body mass index ( P = 0.044) and larger breast size ( P = 0.001). Aspiration was the most common intervention (85.7%), which was performed in the clinic utilizing the expander port site. There was no difference in infection or explantation rate between seroma and no-seroma patients ( P = 0.546 and 0.167), whereas patients with any fluid concern (seroma and/or prolonged drains) were more prone to developing infection and undergoing explantation ( P = 0.041 and P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We recommend that prolonged drain placement longer than 3 weeks should be avoided, and patients should be screened for fluid accumulation after drain removal. Serial aspiration via expander port site and continuation of expansion provide a safe and effective method to manage seromas to avoid infection and expander loss.

Quality of Life in Breast Reconstruction Patients after Irradiation to Tissue Expander: A Propensity-Matched Preliminary Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tissue expanders (TEs) are routinely placed as a first step in breast reconstruction for women who require postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The final reconstruction can then be performed with implants or conversion to autologous tissues. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes and surgical complications in autologous (ABR) versus implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) patients following TE-PMRT.

METHODS

The authors performed a propensity score preliminary analysis (1:1 matching, no replacement) in patients undergoing ABR or IBR following TE-PMRT. Matched covariates included age, race/ethnicity, smoking status, body mass index, history of psychiatric diagnosis, and laterality of reconstruction. Outcomes of interest included complications and BREAST-Q scores for Satisfaction with Breasts, Physical Well-Being of the Chest, Sexual Well-Being, and Psychosocial Well-Being domains.

RESULTS

Of 341 patients with TE-PMRT, a total of 106 patients were included in the matched analysis: 53 ABR patients and 53 IBR patients. ABR and IBR did not differ significantly in matched baseline, cancer, and surgical characteristics. ABR patients had higher scores for Satisfaction with Breasts (greater than the four-point minimal clinically important difference) at all postreconstruction time points compared with IBR patients ( P < 0.05). There were no significant postoperative differences in other BREAST-Q domains. The incidence of complications after definitive reconstruction did not differ significantly among cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this matched preliminary analysis, patients who underwent ABR following irradiation to a TE demonstrated superior satisfaction with breast scores compared with IBR patients. Higher powered matched studies are needed to improve shared decision-making for patients who require mastectomy and PMRT as part of their treatment.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Prepectoral Smooth Versus Textured Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Textured tissue expanders (TEs) had previously gained popularity due to minimizing expander migration, rotation, and capsule migration. Recent studies, though, have revealed increased risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma associated with certain macrotextured implants, prompting surgeons at our institution to switch to smooth TEs; evaluation is thus required for specific viability and similarity of outcomes of smooth TEs. Our study aims to evaluate perioperative complications in prepectoral placement of smooth versus textured TEs.

METHODS

Our retrospective study evaluated perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral prepectoral TE placement, with either smooth or textured TE, at an academic institution between 2017 and 2021 performed by 2 reconstructive surgeons. The perioperative period was defined as the interval between expander placement until conversion to flap/implant or removal of TE due to complications. Our primary outcomes included hematoma, seroma, wounds, infection, unspecified redness, total number of complications, and returns to operating room secondary to complications. Secondary outcomes included time to drain removal, total number of expansions, hospital length of stay, length of time until the next breast reconstruction procedure, next breast reconstruction procedure, and number of expansions.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two patients were evaluated in our study (141 textured, 81 smooth). After propensity matching (71 textured, 71 smooth), our univariate logistic regression showed no significant difference in perioperative complications between smooth and textured expanders (17.1% vs 21.1%; P = 0.396) or complications that required a return to the operating room (10.0% vs 9.2%; P = 0.809). No significant differences were noted for hematoma, seroma, infections, unspecified redness, or wounds between both groups. A significant difference was noted in days to drain out (18.57 ± 8.17 vs 20.13 ± 0.07, P = 0.001) and type of the next breast reconstruction procedure (P < 0.001). Our multivariate regression showed that breast surgeon, hypertension, smoking status, and mastectomy weight were significant for increased risk for complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates similar rates and effectiveness of smooth versus textured TE when used for prepectoral placement, making smooth TEs a safe and valuable alternative for breast reconstruction because of their decreased risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma compared with textured TEs.

Risk factors for capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and silicone implants in nonirradiated patients: A retrospective observational cohort study

Breast reconstruction surgery with tissue expanders and silicone implants is widely performed; however, risk factors for late complications such as capsular contracture have not been fully investigated despite their high prevalence. We investigated the association between expander and implant positions and the development of capsular contracture in patients who underwent breast reconstruction surgery over 10 years previously. In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed 239 patients, among whom 69 (28.9%) had developed capsular contracture of Baker Classification grade II or higher. The position of the expander was classified into six categories based on the inferior margin of the healthy breast. The position of the implant was defined as an upward movement from the position of the expander and was classified into three categories based on the inferior margin of the breast at the time of expander insertion. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we assessed whether the misalignment of the expander and silicone implant positions affected capsular contracture development. Both expander and implant positions were significantly different between the groups. The odds ratios, adjusted for confounding variables, were 3.4 and 5.2 for an expander position of 1 and 2 lateral fingers upward, respectively, and 4.8 and 45.4 for a silicone implant position of 2 and 3 lateral fingers upward, respectively. We identified malposition of expanders and silicone implants as risk factors for developing capsular contracture. Correct insertion and adequate dilatation of the expander in the correct position could reduce the risk for capsular contracture.

Radiation Modality (Proton/Photon), Timing, and Complication Rates in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving 2-Stages Expander/Implant Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Our purpose is to explore the effect of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) modality and timing on complication rates in breast cancer patients receiving immediate 2-stages expander/implant.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the charts of 661 patients who underwent immediate 2-stages expander/implant with/without PMRT at our institution from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts: no radiation, PMRT to expanders (RTE), and PMRT to implants after expander exchange (RTI). PMRT was delivered either with 3-dimensional conformal photon with or without chest wall boost (CWB) or proton therapy. Reconstruction complications were defined as infection/necrosis requiring debridement, capsular-contracture requiring capsulotomy, and reconstruction failure requiring prothesis removal. Logistic regression and Cox models were used to assess the effect of different radiation therapy modalities on complication rates and local control.

RESULTS

Among 661 patients, 309 (46.7%) received PMRT, 220 of the 309 (71.2%) received RTE before exchange, and 89 (28.8%) received RTI after exchange. Seventeen out of 309 (5.5%) patients received proton therapy. The complications among RTE versus RTI cohorts were 22.7% versus 15.7% for infection/necrosis, 13.6% versus 19.1% for capsular-contracture, and 39.5% versus 31.5% for overall reconstruction failure, respectively. Among proton patients, 8/17 (47%) developed capsular contracture compared with 16.4% (24/146) and 10.3% (15/146) in CWB and non-CWB groups, respectively. Adjusted multivariable analysis showed no significant difference between RTI and RTE in terms of infection/necrosis and capsular contracture. Yet, RTE significantly increased overall reconstruction failure compared with RTI (39.5% vs 31.5%; odds ratio [OR], 2.11; P = .02). Protons significantly increased capsular contracture compared with both CWB and non-CWB groups (OR, 5.4; P = .01 and OR, 10.9; P < .001, respectively). Moreover, proton significantly increased overall reconstruction failure. The 5-year local control rates were 95.3% and 97.7% for RTE and RTI, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.2; P = .7).

CONCLUSIONS

Early radiation to the expander before the exchange to implant significantly increased overall reconstruction failure without improving local control. Protons significantly increased capsular contracture rates and overall reconstruction failure leading to more revision surgeries.

A Case for the Use of the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index in Preoperative Risk Assessment for Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Preoperative risk assessment is essential in determining which surgical candidates will have the most to gain from an operation. The 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been validated as an effective way to determine this risk. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the mFI-5 as a predictor of postoperative complications after tissue expander placement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent placement of a tissue expander were identified using the 2012 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis models were used to assess how mFI-5, the components of the mFI-5 (functional status, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, and hypertension), and other factors commonly used to risk stratify (age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and history of smoking) were associated with complications.

RESULTS

In 44,728 tissue expander placement cases, the overall complication rate was 10.5% (n = 4674). The mFI-5 score was significantly higher in the group that experienced complications (0.08 vs 0.06, P < 0.001). Compared with the mFI-5 individual components and other common variables used preoperatively to risk stratify patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that mFI-5 had the largest effect size (odds ratio [OR], 5.46; confidence interval [CI], 4.29-6.94; P < 0.001). After controlling for age, BMI, ASA classification, and history of smoking, the mFI-5 still remained the predictor of complications with the largest effect size (OR, 2.25; CI, 1.70-2.97; P < 0.001). In assessing specific complications, the mFI-5 is the independent predictor with the largest significant effect size for surgical dehiscence (OR, 12.76; CI, 5.58-28.18; P < 0.001), surgical site infection (OR, 6.68; CI, 4.53-9.78; P < 0.001), reoperation (OR, 5.23; CI, 3.90-6.99; P < 0.001), and readmission (OR, 4.59; CI, 3.25-6.45; P < 0.001) when compared with age, BMI, ASA class, and/or history of smoking alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The mFI-5 can be used as an effective preoperative predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing tissue expander placement. Not only does it have the largest effect size compared with other historical perioperative risk factors, it is more predictive than each of its individual components.

Is Elective Nighttime Operation Associated With Adverse Outcomes? Analysis in Immediate Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Despite the long-standing presumption that nighttime surgery could affect adverse outcomes, its association independent of patient's general condition and disease severity remains unclear. We hypothesized that conducting elective surgery for subjects with good physical status at nighttime was not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications and aimed to examine it in tissue-expander-insertion (TEI) operation for breast reconstruction.

METHOD

Patients who underwent immediate unilateral TEI-based breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2019 were enrolled. They were categorized into 3 groups based on the starting time of the TEI operation: 8 am to 6 pm (group 1), 6 pm to 8 pm (group 2), and after 8 pm (group 3). The postoperative complication rates were compared among the groups. The independent associations of each variable, including the operation starting time and adverse outcomes, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 1458 patients were analyzed, including 970 in group 1, 358 in group 2, and 130 in group 3. The groups showed similar baseline characteristics regarding comorbidities and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Compared with group 1, group 3 was associated with significantly increased rates of overall complications including infection, reoperation, and premature removal of the tissue expander. These differences retained influences in the multivariable analyses. Group 3 showed a significantly longer hospitalization period than the other 2 groups. The complication rates did not differ between groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting TEI operation at nighttime seems to be associated with increased risks of adverse postoperative outcomes compared with conducting it during regular working hours.

Complication Profile of Total Submuscular Versus Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the safety profile of prepectoral breast reconstruction with total submuscular tissue expander reconstruction, previously our standard. Primary outcomes of interest in this retrospective cohort study were incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, mastectomy flap necrosis, and reconstruction loss.

METHODS

Total submuscular and prepectoral with acellular dermal matrix reconstructions consecutively performed by a single surgeon (P.D.S.) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were compared. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as complications and complication types, were extracted for all patients. A t test was used to assess differences in continuous variables. Multivariate logistics regression was used to assess the association between type of reconstruction and complication rate. The statistical significance was set at 0.05 for all comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (234 breasts) were included. There was a significantly greater incidence of infection (16.5% vs 5.5%, P < 0.01) in the prepectoral/acellular dermal matrix cohort. However, reconstructive loss was low in both cohorts (2.5% and 3.0%, P = 0.83). Adjusted odds ratio for complications in the prepectoral cohort was 2.26, but this was not statistically significant (adjusted P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Prepectoral breast reconstruction shares an overall complication profile that is not greater than that of total submuscular reconstruction. It is associated with a greater risk of infection; however, the ability to salvage the reconstruction with early, aggressive intervention results in low rates of reconstructive loss, comparable with those of total submuscular reconstruction.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minority patients and those from low socioeconomic backgrounds are faced with barriers to care regarding breast reconstruction. With this study, we seek to elucidate variances in demographics to determine predictors of complications in implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with either direct to implant or immediate expander reconstruction by 1 surgeon were identified using the preoperative Breast-Q.Current income statistics available from the US Census Bureau by self-reported zip code were used to determine the median household income (MHI) to stratify differing socioeconomic backgrounds. Demographics were compared with body mass index, comorbidities, overall rate of postoperative complications, rate of implant infection, and type of reconstruction.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria. Overall rate of complications and rate of breast implant infection was higher for MHI of less than $50,000 compared with greater than $50,000 (P = 0.043 overall complications 40.20% vs 28.8%) (P = 0.04 implant infection 14.4% vs 7.1%). African American patients had higher body mass index (P = <0.001), rates of HTN (P = <0.001), and diabetes (P = 0.001), and were more likely to have a lower income (P = <0.001). There was, however, no difference in overall complications (P = 0.26), implant infection rate (P = 0.994), or capsular contracture (0.367) based on race. There was no difference in rate of comorbidities between low and high socioeconomic areas.

CONCLUSION

This cohort demonstrates a higher rate of overall complications and infection in patients with a lower MHI and no difference based on race despite having higher risk factors for complications.Socioeconomic status is a multifaceted barrier to care that must be addressed in the perioperative period to decrease breast implant associated complications.

Smooth Versus Textured Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Ongoing recognition of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and its link with textured devices has brought a paradigm shift in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. Many institutions no longer offer textured expansion devices for staged reconstruction. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of smooth tissue expanders (TE). We hypothesized that the time to final reconstruction and complication profile between smooth and textured TEs would be similar in breast reconstruction patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent TE breast reconstruction during a 6-year period at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Rates of complications treated nonoperatively and those requiring reoperation were assessed. Mechanical complications, including expander malposition and rupture, were evaluated. Time to final breast reconstruction was quantified. Mixed-effects logistic regression and linear regression models, as appropriate, were used to compare textured to smooth TEs. Patient characteristics and anatomic plane placement were adjusted for in all analyses of outcomes.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 389 patients, encompassing 140 smooth and 604 textured TEs. Textured devices had an increased incidence of complications treated nonsurgically (16.7% vs 10.7%; P = 0.14). However, smooth TEs had an increased incidence of reoperation (12.1% vs 7.6%; P = 0.06). Most noteworthy was that although smooth TEs had a 40-fold increase in malposition (13.6% vs 0.3%; P < 0.001), no reoperation for this complication was warranted. Further, the time to final reconstruction was comparable between the 2 devices (textured expanders: 221 days and smooth expanders: 234 days; P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Staged, implant-based reconstruction is the most common surgical approach to recreate the breast mound following mastectomy. Textured TEs were the cornerstone to this approach. Unfortunately, the association between textured devices and BIA-ALCL now mandates an alternative. We postulated that smooth expanders would compare favorably for breast reconstruction. Although our study suggests that smooth TEs suffer more malposition, this has a negligible impact on the reconstructive timeline. Thus, smooth TEs may prove beneficial when considering the risk of BIA-ALCL associated with textured devices.

Reconstructive Trends After Tissue-Expander Loss in Breast Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Tissue-expander breast reconstruction (TEBR) is a common method of reconstruction after mastectomy but may result in complications that may necessitate removal. Although complications in TEBR have been well studied, there is a paucity of data regarding outcomes after tissue-expander loss. In this study, we examine the eventual reconstructive pathways and associated factors of patients who required tissue-expander removal after infection.

METHODS

This retrospective study examines patients undergoing breast reconstruction at a single institution. Patients included underwent mastectomy, immediate TEBR, and subsequent tissue-expander loss. Patients who underwent autologous reconstruction after mastectomy or had successful TEBR were excluded. Patients were followed for an average of 7 years, with a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 13 years.

RESULTS

A total of 674 TEBR patients were initially screened, of which 60 patients (8.9%) required tissue-expander removal because of infection or skin necrosis. Thirty-one of these patients (group 1) did not complete reconstruction after initial tissue-expander loss, whereas the remaining 29 patients (group 2) underwent either TEBR or autologous reconstruction after tissue-expander loss. Group 1 had a significantly higher mean body mass index than group 2 (32.61 ± 8.88 vs 28.69 ± 5.84; P = 0.049) and also lived further away from our institution than group 2 (P = 0.052), which trended toward significance. There were otherwise no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups.Among the 29 patients in group 2, 18 patients underwent a second TEBR (group 2a), and 11 patients underwent autologous reconstruction (group 2b). Patients in group 2b had a significantly greater mean number of complication related admissions (1.11 ± 0.323 vs 1.55 ± 0.688; P = 0.029) and also had higher occurrence of postmastectomy radiation therapy (16.7% vs 45.5%; P = 0.092), although this was not significant. There were otherwise no differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate the trends in breast reconstruction decision making after initial tissue-expander loss. This study elucidates the factors associated with patients who undergo different reconstructive options. Further work is needed to delineate the specific reasons between the decision to pursue different reconstructive pathways among a larger cohort of patients.

Skin Reducing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Complications of implant-based reconstruction have been shown to be related to increasing body mass index (BMI) and breast size. The impact of skin reducing mastectomy (SRM) with a dermal flap is examined.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience with immediate submuscular tissue expander (TE) reconstruction from 2011 to 2019 was performed. The outcomes of SRM were compared with those of skin sparing mastectomy (SSM).

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients (292 breasts) were identified. Mastectomy types were as follows: SRM, 73 (136 breasts) and SSM, 89 (156 breasts). Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was used to supplement TE coverage in 65.4% of SRM cases. Mean BMI was 29.2 among SRM patients and 25.9 in SSM patients (P < 0.001). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was more prevalent in the SRM group (SRM, 38.4% vs SSM, 22.5%; P = 0.03). Mean mastectomy weight was higher in the SRM group (SRM, 833.6 g vs SSM, 425.6 g; P < 0.001). Mean BMI and mastectomy weight were lower in SRM patients who were reconstructed with ADM (ADM, 28.1 vs no ADM, 30.8; P = 0.01; ADM, 746.1 g vs no ADM, 1006.3 g; P < 0.001). Minor complications were more prevalent in the SRM group (SRM, 22.8% vs SSM, 4.5%; P < 0.001). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) was more common in the SRM group (SRM, 22.8% vs SSM, 7.7%; P < 0.001), but MSFN necessitating operative debridement was similarly low in both groups (SRM: 1.9% vs SSM: 4.5%). Major complication rates (SRM 11.0% vs SSM 10.9%) and reconstructive failure rates (SRM 5.9% vs SSM 5.1%) were similar between groups. Mastectomy weight 800 g or higher and BMI of 30 or higher were found to be risk factors for complications on analysis of the SRM cohort (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy weight and BMI were positive predictors of complications after immediate TE reconstruction. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis is more common after SRM than SSM. The use of SRM with a dermal flap has a similar major complication rate as SSM despite its use in obese, large-breasted women. The dermal flap provides soft tissue coverage, which prevents implant exposure and seroma. The use of ADM does not adversely affect the complication rate of SRM.

Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: early and long-term safety evaluation of 146 unselected cases of the early pre-pectoral era of a single-institution, including cases with previous breast irradiation and post-mastectomy radiation therapy

We re-evaluated acute and early-late toxicity-related factors among pre-pectoral immediate tissue expander/implant (TE/I) breast reconstruction (BR) unselected, first-era, cases, including previous breast radiation treatment and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). A retrospective analysis of 146 (117 therapeutic and 29 prophylactic) pre-pectoral reconstructions, between 2012 and 2016, considered patient-related (age, body mass index [BMI], smoke-history, comorbidity, BRCA mutation), and treatment-related characteristics (previous irradiation, axillary surgery, PMRT, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and target-therapy). Safety was evaluated as acute and early-late complications, and TE/I failures. At multivariate analysis of the 146 cases (117 patients submitted to BR) a significant factor related to acute toxicity was: BMI ≥ 25 (31.3% [≥ 25] vs 8.8% [< 25]; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.56-12.6; p = 0.003), while previous breast surgery on ipsilateral side presented a borderline significance (31.6% [previous surgery] vs 7.4% [no previous surgery]; OR 3.74, 95% CI 0.97-14.40; p = 0.055). Factors significantly related to TE/I failure were: current or previous smoking exposition (13.8% [smokers] vs 2.6% [non-smokers]; OR 7.32, 95% CI 1.37-39.08; p = 0.02) and preoperative chemotherapy (18.8% [yes] vs 3.5% [no]; OR 8.16, 95% CI 1.29-51.63; p = 0.026). At 4-year median follow-up, 3 deaths, 5 locoregional recurrences, and 14 distant metastases occurred. Immediate pre-pectoral BR is safe and effective, with low rates of acute and early-late complications. BMI and previous breast surgery were related to higher complications but not failure; smoking and preoperative chemotherapy were related to TE/I explant. Previous RT and PMRT were related neither to early-late toxicity nor failure.

An Unusual Case of BIA-ALCL Associated with Prolonged/Complicated Biocell-Textured Expander, followed by Smooth Round Breast Implant Exposure, and Concurrent Use of Adalimumab

SUMMARY

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a malignancy associated with textured breast implants. BIA-ALCL is typically restricted to the periprosthetic capsule, presenting as a unilateral recurrent seroma years after placement of a textured breast implant. Current estimates suggest an incidence of one in 3300 for patients with Allergan Biocell textured implants. As of February 6, 2019, U.S. Medical Device Reporting associated with BIA-ALCL showed 457 unique cases of BIA-ALCL, with 24 "unverified and potentially inaccurate" cases associated with a nontextured implant. As of February of 2019, there were 688 reported cases to date worldwide. To date, there are no published case reports of BIA-ALCL associated exclusively with smooth implants or with smooth implants after textured expanders, and there has been no reported smooth-only case in any registry, database, or journal worldwide. The authors present a case of BIA-ALCL associated with smooth round implants and textured tissue expanders. A 56-year-old woman was treated for left stage IIA invasive ductal carcinoma with bilateral mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with bilateral subpectoral textured tissue expanders. She underwent exchange to Mentor smooth-round implants, and completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging and examination 4.5 years after implant placement showed no abnormal findings. The patient had left breast trauma 5 years following implant placement while taking adalimumab, and developed an open wound requiring explantation. A recurrent seroma developed, and tested positive for BIA-ALCL on cytology. Surgical pathologic examination after total capsulectomy demonstrated stage IA BIA-ALCL. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case report of BIA-ALCL in a patient with textured expanders followed by prolonged exposure to smooth round implants.

Factors Preventing Prolonged Closed-Suction Drain Placement after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Tissue Expanders

BACKGROUND

Prolonged drain placement occasionally causes complications such as infection in patients who have undergone implant-based breast reconstruction; therefore, the drainage period must be shortened to avoid complications.

PURPOSE

To identify the factors that prevent prolonged drain placement in patients who have undergone immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.

METHODS

This was a retrospective medical chart review of all patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders at a single center from April 2013 to March 2016. Closed-suction drains were placed in and on the implant pocket. An extra drain was positioned in the axilla in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection. The drains were removed at a drainage volume of ≤50 ml per 24 hours. Prolonged drain placement was defined as a period greater than the 75th percentile among all patients. Nine potential risk factors associated with prolonged drain placement were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 89 tissue expanders in 89 patients were placed in this study. Prolonged drain placement, determined as ≥9 days (range, 5-14 days), was significantly associated with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, tissue expander size ≥500 ml, and intraoperative bleeding ≥100 ml, in the multivariate analysis. Axillary lymph node dissection with extra-axillary drainage did not prolong the drainage period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that placing an extra-axillary closed-suction drain following axillary dissection, and reducing intraoperative bleeding and surgical trauma, could prevent prolonged drain placement in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.

Pemphigus vulgaris possibly associated with application of a tissue expander in a patient with Crohn's disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune disease of the skin and mucous membranes characterized by suprabasal acantholysis and formation of blisters and erosions due to generation of IgG autoantibodies directed against desmosomal proteins. Tissue expanders are devices that, through controlled mechanical overstretch, are capable of generating new skin that is used to cover wounds or extended surgical defects. We report the case of a 13-year-old girl suffering from Crohn's disease (CD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) who developed PV after application of a tissue expander for surgical removal of a giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN). To the best of our knowledge, the case presented here is the first report of PV possibly associated with the application of a tissue expander and also the first report of coexistence of PV with either PSC or with PSC and CD in the same patient. Triggering or acute exacerbation of PV may be considered a possible side-effect of tissue expander application, especially in patients with a genetic predisposition for pemphigus and/or other autoimmune diseases. In view of the increasing use of tissue expanders in clinical practice, physicians should be aware of this rare side-effect in order to promptly diagnose it.

RETRACTED: An erector spinae plane block for chronic pain management after tissue expander insertion

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief as it contains fabricated/falsified data. The Editor-in-Chief decision was based on the investigation by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists which concluded that no research was conducted and all the data including patient backgrounds were fabricated. The society also concluded that the corresponding author, Dr. Ueshima presented the names of the individuals not involved or only partially involved in research as lead authors, presented the names of the individuals not involved in research as co-authors and submitted papers without the agreement of the co-authors. The investigation report can be found here.

Quantitative analysis of shoulder function and strength after breast reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy has been proven to affect patient quality of life, psychological well-being, and functional capacities. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effect of breast reconstruction on postoperative shoulder function and muscle performance by evaluating isokinetic muscle performance tests.A retrospective chart review to collect data on shoulder function analysis with isokinetic muscle performance testing was performed among patients who received mastectomy with IBR from July 2013 to March 2015. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: a control group that underwent mastectomy without reconstruction, a tissue expander/implant insertion group, a pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flap group, and a free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap group.Analysis of the groups at 1 to 3, 4 to 6, 7 to 9, 10 to 12, and 13 to 15 months postoperatively showed significant shoulder function improvement in the tissue expander/implant and TRAM groups as measured by linear regression analysis. Compared with the control group, patients who received immediate reconstruction with tissue expander/implant insertion or a TRAM flap showed statistically significant improvement in shoulder function after mastectomy.IBR with a TRAM flap or tissue expander/implant insertion were more beneficial for shoulder rehabilitation and for regaining function compared to mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction with a LD flap.

Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Use Under Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Perioperative Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting data on the potential necrotic complications of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) use in breast reconstruction, and most studies focus on mastectomy flap necrosis as an outcome measure associated with ADM use. The aim of this study was to examine cases with necrotic complications with and without the use of ADM and to investigate whether ADM affected perioperative outcomes in cases with necrotic complications.

METHODS

Patients who experienced mastectomy flap necrosis following mastectomy with tissue expander placement between January 2009 and March 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was explantation of the expander, and other associated outcomes such as seroma or infection were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 57 breasts with mastectomy flap necrosis were identified: 32 of which were in the non-ADM group and 25 in the ADM group. The rate of explantation was 28% (7/25) in the ADM group versus 6.3% (2/32) in the non-ADM group, which was significantly different (P = 0.034). The ADM group had a significantly higher rate of "major" infection requiring surgical debridement than the non-ADM group (P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that the use of ADM was trending toward an increasing expander rate with borderline significance (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that ADM use under mastectomy flap necrosis was a potential risk for explantation of the expander and major infection. Surgeons should be cautious with the use of ADM with devascularized mastectomy skin flaps prone to necrosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Complications of Post-Burn Tissue Expansion Reconstruction: 9 Years Experience with 42 Pediatric and 26 Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Burn scar reconstruction is extremely challenging, even for the most proficient reconstructive surgeon. Within the arsenal of tools at the plastic surgeon's disposal, tissue expansion provides an efficient modality for reconstruction despite the reported complication rates.

OBJECTIVES

To critically review our experience with tissue expansion for burn scar reconstruction, comparing particularly the adult and pediatric populations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients who underwent burn scar reconstruction with tissue expansion at Hadassah Medical Center between January 2003 and July 2012. The data included patient age, anatomical site of expansion, number of procedures, and associated complications. The outcomes of the above-mentioned populations were also compared with those in a control group of patients undergoing reconstruction with tissue expansion for indications other than burn scars.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven tissue expansion procedures were carried out in 50 patients, 42 in the pediatric population (< 16 years of age) and 25 in the adult population. Complications were observed in 10 of the 42 pediatric procedures (23.8%) and in 3 of the 25 adult procedures (12%). This difference was found to be statistically significant. When the complication rate for each population was compared to its control group (tissue expansion for indications other than burn scar reconstruction, such as reconstruction for motor vehicle accident scarring, congenital nevi, or vascular malformations), no statistically significant difference was found between them (complication rates 19.8% and 12.5%, respectively). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the different anatomical areas of expansion within both populations undergoing burn scar reconstruction. Most of the complicated cases completed successful reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue expansion is a useful surgical tool in post-burn scar reconstruction, both in the adult and pediatric populations and in all anatomic sites, despite consistently high complication rates, especially in the pediatric population. This complication rate is not higher than in patients undergoing tissue expansion for indications other than burn scar reconstruction.

Implications of Long-term Indwelling of Tissue Expander in Breast Reconstruction: Risk of Expander Rupturing

BACKGROUND/AIM

Breast reconstruction with a tissue expander (TE) is associated with postoperative complications, including rupturing of the TE. Any device can have a mechanical failure, and a TE may rupture over time. Although an interval of around one year from initial TE insertion to the second stage of two-stage surgery is historically considered the standard, the optimal interval has not yet been determined. Furthermore, the durability of a TE and the influence of long-term indwelling on TE rupture are uncertain. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the effects of long-term indwelling on TE durability and rupturability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 24 patients and 25 breasts with breast cancer that had undergone breast reconstruction with an expander that was indwelling for more than a year. The resected margins were all clear, and none of the patients required postoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

From a total of 25 reconstructed breast mounds, the TE ruptured in 4 cases. None of the clinicopathological features, including primary tumor progression, method of operation, presence of adjuvant chemotherapy, was significantly associated with TE rupture. Rupture was observed beginning at 1.5 years after the initial TE insertion. The rupture rate was 32.6% by the third year and 55.1% by five years. There were no ruptures among cases with TE exchange within a year.

CONCLUSION

Long-term indwelling of TE is associated with TE rupture. We recommend that the appropriate interval between the first and second stages of breast reconstructive surgery is aproximatelly one year.

Risk Factors for Complications in Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction for Non-obese Patients: Impact of Breast Size on Complications

BACKGROUND

Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for complications in immediate expander-implant breast reconstruction, no studies have identified risk factors for non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for complications in non-obese patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 397 consecutive immediate expander-implant breast reconstructions in 367 non-obese patients at a single institution over a 5-year period was conducted. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine the influence of six patient-related and eight procedure-related characteristics on complications.

RESULTS

Mean BMI was 21.7 ± 2 kg/m(2) and median mastectomy weight was 298.0 g (range: 40-1164 g). Multivariable analysis showed that neither BMI nor the use of acellular dermal matrix was a predictor for complications. Adjuvant radiation (odds = 3.12, p < 0.001) and mastectomy weight (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for complications. A 100 g increase in the mastectomy weight was significantly associated with a 23 % increase in the odds of overall complications (p = 0.003), major complications (p = 0.004), and skin flap complications (p = 0.007), as well as a 28 % increase in the odds of seroma (p = 0.044), but was not associated with reconstruction failure. Adjuvant radiation (p < 0.001) and hypertension (p < 0.001) were risk factors for reconstruction failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast size was an independent risk factor for complications in non-obese patients while BMI was not. In the reconstruction of large breasts, greater attention and additional adjunctive procedures would be needed to prevent complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix

BACKGROUND

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used for tissue expander/implant breast (TE/I-based) reconstruction. But the relation between ADM and postoperative complications remains controversial. A few meta-analyses were conducted in 2011-2012 and the result revealed that ADM can increase the risk of complications. The purpose of our study is to offer updated evidence for ADM clinical application by analyzing the effect of ADM on complications of TE/I-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The literature published from January 2010 to February 2015 was searched in EMbase, Medline, Science Direct, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CBMdisc, CNKI, VIP, and the references of those included studies were also searched by hand. According to inclusive criteria, 11 studies were selected and the values were extracted from the included literature. Complications with four different categories assigned for overall complications, infection, hematoma/seroma, and explantation were collected. RevMan 5.1 was used for meta-analysis. The evidence level was assessed by using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

Eleven published studies were included. The results showed that compared to the control group, the ADM group increased the rate of overall complications (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.70, p = 0.03), infection (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.06, p = 0.03), hematoma/seroma (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.13-2.44, p = 0.01), but there was no significant difference in explantation (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.89-2.11, p = 0.15). Based on the GRADE system, all the evidence was at level C and weak recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

In TE/I-based breast reconstruction, ADM increased the incidence of overall complications, infection, and hematoma/seroma; the incidence of explantation remains unknown. For the poor quality of the original studies, a prudent choice is suggested; and more high-quality, large-sample studies are needed.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.

Does postoperative radiation therapy represent a contraindication to expander-implant based immediate breast reconstruction? An update 2012-2014

OBJECTIVE

Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is well known in the plastic surgery community for having a negative impact on expander-implant based immediate breast reconstruction (IBBR), although recently some technical improvements allow better results. Very recent papers would suggest that there is no difference in postoperative complications in patients receiving post-mastectomy radiotherapy using modern techniques. However, study results are often biased by small groups of patients and by heterogeneity of radiotherapy timing, different surgical techniques and measured outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have conducted a MEDLINE search to summarize the latest data (2012-2014) on the topic. Search was conducted using the following parameters: breast reconstruction AND implant AND expander AND post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The MEDLINE search showed 53 reports, demonstrating a great interest on this topic; among these 37 dealed specifically with post-mastectomy radiotherapy after breast reconstruction. In particular, 15 were amenable to plastic surgeons, 6 to breast surgeons, 9 to radiotherapists and 7 to oncologists. Papers amenable to plastic surgeons highlighted the highest rate of undesired results, although with recent advances such as delayed-immediate reconstruction or protective lipofilling.

CONCLUSIONS

PMRT remains an undesired event when pursuing an implant-based breast reconstruction, although it does not represent an absolute contraindication. The higher rate of complications reported by plastic surgeons and not by other specialists can be explained with the greater attention to aesthetic details, such as capsular contractures, that our community has. Technical strategies to prevent complications described in this community now allow better results, should be well known and improved if possible in the future.

[The impact of acellular dermal matrix on complications of breast reconstruction using tissue expander/implant: a meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) on complications of breast reconstruction using tissue expander/implant, and to offer preliminary evidences for ADM clinical application.

METHODS

Articles published from Jan. 2010 to Oct. 2012 were searched in Pubmed, EMbase, Science Direct and CNKI database. Literatures were filtrated according to inclusive criteria. Values were extracted from included literatures; factors regarding complications were collected. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12. 0.

RESULTS

10 researches were included. Comparing to control group, the pooled odds ratio (OR) of overall complications, infections, hematomas/seromas, explantations are 1.51(P=0.038), 1.91(P=0.032), 1.80(P=0.005) and 2.37 (P=0.138) in ADM group In breast reconstruction using tissue expander/implant, ADM increases the respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

occurrence of hematomas/sarcomas as well as risks of infections and overall complications.

Cost comparison of immediate one-stage and tissue-expander breast reconstructions after mastectomy in commercially insured patients

OBJECTIVE

Growing acceptance of nipple-sparing mastectomy and rising rates of prophylactic mastectomy due to genetic findings make immediate one-stage implant breast reconstruction an attractive option for many American women facing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. We compared medical services utilization and cost of immediate one-stage reconstruction with that of the more common tissue-expander (TE) breast reconstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective administrative claims database analysis.

METHODS

We obtained commercial insurance claims on patients in the U.S. who had undergone one-stage or TE post-mastectomy implant breast reconstructions in 2008, and we compared 18-month results in terms of the frequency and cost of return visits for additional procedures and/or for the treatment of complications. Return visits were categorized as planned, planned with revision, or unplanned.

RESULTS

Among 1,316 immediate implant breast reconstructions, 95 (7%) were one-stage procedures and 1,221 (93%) were TE reconstructions. The data showed a modest, nonsignificant trend toward fewer return visits after one-stage reconstruction versus TE reconstruction (191 vs. 242 visits per 100 patients, respectively; relative risk [RR]: 0.95). Patients with TE reconstructions returned more often for planned returns and planned returns with revisions. Patients with one-stage reconstructions returned more often for unplanned events. The total costs over 18 months were $34,839 and $39,062 for one-stage and TE reconstructions, respectively, for a difference of -$4,223 (P = 0.38). The initial reconstruction, including the mastectomy, accounted for 64% of the 18-month costs with one-stage reconstructions and for 54% of the 18-month costs for TE reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

Costs and utilization trended lower over 18 months for one-stage versus TE reconstructions following post-mastectomy breast reconstructions but did not achieve statistical significance.

[Complications of head and neck skin expansion]

INTRODUCTION

Skin expansion is a good solution for the reconstruction of head and neck defects. We assessed the complications of cervico-facial skin expansion technique to draft recommendations so as to minimize risks.

METHODS

We made a retrospective study from 1990 to 2005. Complications were analyzed according to age, sex, etiology, area to reconstruct, location of the expander, expander volume and number, simultaneous single or repeated technique, type of expander, duration of expansion, and type of flap used for reconstruction.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-nine tissue expanders were placed in 114 patients. The rate of complications was 60.4%. Age was not a risk factor (P=0.21; Fisher's exact test). The early complications were not related to the expander volume (P=0.32; Fisher's exact test). Infection was the most frequent complication (51.3%). Hypertrophic or large scars, retraction, or cording accounted for 32.4% of sequels. A rate of 6.5% of total and 6.5% of partial failure were recorded. Infection was the cause of 77.8% of total or partial failure.

DISCUSSION

The complications of head and neck soft tissue expansion are often minor. The rate of reconstruction failure remains acceptable.

[Analysis of breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery]

Mastectomy is recommended for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy(breast-conserving treatment). However, the number of patients who receive radiation therapy such as breast- conserving treatment in the hope of breast reconstruction is increasing. Radiation therapy has a significant magnifying effect on the difficulties of breast reconstruction. In the study presented here, we compared the patients who underwent mastectomy+ breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and an implant after IBTR and breast-conserving treatment (irradiation group, n=5) with patients who underwent mastectomy+breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and an implant at the time of the first breast cancer operation (non-irradiation group, n=21). The parameters compared were background, complications, reconstruction success rate, and capsular contraction. A significant difference was not observed between the 2 groups. Complications after operation, specifically capsular contracture, are reported to be more frequent in the radiation group than in the non-irradiation group. However, with appropriate explanation of the risks, this surgery is an option for patients who strongly desire breast reconstruction.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and optic neuritis: case report and literature review

A history of optic neuritis has long been considered a relative contraindication to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. However, the published medical literature regarding the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with previous optic neuritis is very limited, and patients who might benefit from hyperbaric oxygen therapy may be denied its benefit without adequate consideration of the risk-benefit ratio. We present a case report of a patient with a history of optic neuritis who underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation before and after 40 treatments with hyperbaric oxygen therapy, with no detectable ophthalmologic deficit.

Intra-oral soft tissue expansion and volume stability of onlay bone grafts

Insufficient regeneration of missing bone and soft-tissue may present aesthetic or functional problems in patients indicated for dental implant surgery. Several techniques such as bone grafts, bone substitutes and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) have been described to rebuild a compromised alveolar ridge. Adequate soft-tissue coverage of grafted bone and titanium-mesh is important to avoid exposure which may result in loss of the bone graft. The general aim of this thesis was to evaluate use of an osmotic tissue expander for expanding intra-oral soft tissue--creating a surplus of soft tissue-- in preparation for onlay bone grafting. An experimental rabbit model was used in studies (I), (II) and (III). In (I) an osmotic soft-tissue expander was placed bilaterally on the lateral wall of the mandible via an extra-oral approach. After two weeks of expansion the rabbits were killed and specimens were collected for histology. No inflammatory reaction and no resorbtion of the cortical bone occured. The periosteum was expanded and new bone formation was seen in the edges of the expander. In (II) and (III) the expander was placed under the periosteum in the same way as in (I): bilaterally in 13 rabbits in (II) and unilaterally in 11 rabbits in (III). After two weeks of expansion the expander was identified and removed. In (II) particulated bone was placed at the recipient site protected by a titanium mesh in one site and a bio-resorbable mesh on the other site. In (III), DBBM particles and bone particles collected from the lateral border of the mandible separated by a collagen membrane was placed at the recipient site. The graft was protected by a pre-bent titanium mesh covered by a collagen membrane. After a healing period of 3 months specimens were collected for histological and SEM examination. New bone was growing in direct contact with the titanium mesh and bio resorbable mesh. The newly formed bone had the same calcium content as the mature bone in the base of the mandible. In the clinical study (IV) 20 patients were consecutively recruited and randomised into two groups. The experimental group (ten patients) had an osmotic soft tissue expander implanted. After two weeks of expansion the expander was removed and a particulated bone graft protected by a titanium mesh and a collagen membrane was fixed to the recipient site. Titanium implants were installed after a healing period of 6 months. The patients in the reference group had a bone block grafted from the anterior ramus fixated to the recipient site with one or two titanium mini screws. Implants were installed after a healing period of 6 months. A three dimensional optical measuring device was used to measure alterations in the soft tissue profile before each surgical procedure. The three-dimensional changes were then analysed on a PC. The results from the clinical study in patients confirmed the results from the experimental rabbit studies. The osmotic tissue expander expanded the soft tissue. Expander perforations of the soft tissue occurred in two patients. The optical measurements demonstrated a positive volume gain after soft tissue expansion and bone grafting. The expanded tissue could be used to cover a bone graft. There still was a risk of mesh exposure, even after soft tissue expansion, which occurred in two patients. In both groups, implants could be installed in the grafted bone in positions that would allow the crowns to fit aesthetically into the dental arch.