51
|
Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Wright F, Poll A, Candib A, McCready D, Cil T, Armel S, Silberman Y, Brennenstuhl S, Narod SA. Impact of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at time of breast cancer diagnosis on psychosocial functioning. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:631-641. [PMID: 34846626 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06457-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many women are being offered rapid genetic testing (RGT) for cancer predisposition genes, at the time of breast cancer diagnosis prior to surgery. The goal of this study was to determine if psychosocial functioning was affected in women receiving RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS Participants were women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, at four centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible women were referred into the study by their surgeon at the time of diagnosis. Participants received pre-test genetic counselling and were offered RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Standardized questionnaires (Impact of Event Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were completed before genetic counselling, and follow-up questionnaires at one-week and one-year post-genetic test result disclosure (higher scores indicate higher symptoms). RESULTS 1007 women had RGT; 60 women (6.0%) were found to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, 80 women (7.9%) had a VUS, and 867 (86.1%) had a negative test result. At one-week post-testing, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.32), anxiety (p = 0.14), or depression (p = 0.42) between women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and those with a negative result. At one year, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.75) or anxiety (p = 0.13) between women with a BRCA1 or BRCA/2 mutation and those with a negative result. However, women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had significantly lower depression scores compared to women with a negative result (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION For women who have RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, identifying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation does not impair psychosocial functioning in the short or long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Aletta Poll
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Tulin Cil
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Armel
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Brennenstuhl
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Baszuk P, Marciniak W, Derkacz R, Jakubowska A, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Dębniak T, Huzarski T, Białkowska K, Pietrzak S, Muszyńska M, Kładny J, Narod SA, Lubiński J, Lener MR. Blood Copper Levels and the Occurrence of Colorectal Cancer in Poland. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9111628. [PMID: 34829856 PMCID: PMC8615693 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9111628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need for sensitive and specific biomarkers for the early detection of colorectal cancer. In this retrospective study, we assessed whether a high blood copper level was associated with the presence of colorectal cancer. The blood copper level was measured among 187 colorectal cancer patients and 187 matched controls. Cases and controls were matched for sex, smoking status (yes/no) and year of birth. Among the cases, the mean blood copper level was 1031 µg/L (range 657 µg/L to 2043 µg/L) and among the controls, the mean blood copper level was 864 µg/L (range 589 µg/L to 1433 µg/L). The odds ratio for colorectal cancer for those in the highest quartile of copper level (versus the lowest) was 12.7 (95% CI: 4.98–32.3; p < 0.001). Of the patients with stage I–II colon cancer, 62% had a copper level in the highest quartile. A blood copper level in excess of 930 µg/L is associated with an increase in the prevalence of colorectal cancer in the Polish population and its potential use in early detection programs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Baszuk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Wojciech Marciniak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Róża Derkacz
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Sandra Pietrzak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Magdalena Muszyńska
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Józef Kładny
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, First Clinical Hospital of Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada;
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Grzepnica, Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Marcin R. Lener
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (P.B.); (W.M.); (R.D.); (A.J.); (C.C.); (J.G.); (T.D.); (T.H.); (K.B.); (S.P.); (M.M.); (J.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-91-441-7250
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Hird AE, Saskin R, Liu Y, Lee Y, Ajib K, Matta R, Kodama R, Carr L, Kulkarni GS, Herschorn S, Narod SA, Nam RK. Association between chronic bladder catheterisation and bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050728. [PMID: 34475180 PMCID: PMC8413958 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the risk of bladder cancer and bladder cancer mortality among patients with chronic bladder catheterisation (indwelling or intermittent) to patients from the general population. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Population-based study in Ontario, Canada between 2003 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients 18-90 years of age with chronic bladder catheterisation were hard matched to patients from the general population without a history of bladder catheterisation. INTERVENTIONS The presence of a chronic catheter was defined as a minimum of two physician encounters for bladder catheterisation, suprapubic tube insertion or home care for catheter care separated by at least 28 days. Urinary tract infection (UTI) rates were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Bladder cancer and bladder cancer-specific mortality after a 1-year lag period were compared between groups. RESULTS We identified 36 903 patients with chronic catheterisation matched to 110 709 patients without a history of catheterisation. Patients were followed for a median of 8.8 years (IQR: 5.2-11.9 years). The median age was 62 years (IQR: 50-71) and 52% were female. More patients in the catheter group developed bladder cancer (393 (1.1%) vs 304 (0.3%),p<0.001). There were 106 (0.3%) bladder cancer deaths in the catheter group and 59 (0.1%) in the comparison group (p<0.001). Chronic catheterisation (adjusted subdistribution HR (sdHR)=4.80, 95% CI: 4.26 to 5.42,p<0.001) and the number of UTIs (adjusted sdHR=1.04 per UTI, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.05,p<0.001) were independent predictors of bladder cancer. The relative rate of bladder cancer-specific death was more than eightfold higher among patients with chronic catheterisation (adjusted sdHR=8.68, 95% CI: 6.97 to 10.81,p<0.001). Subgroup analysis among patients with neurogenic bladder and bladder calculi similarly revealed an increased risk of bladder cancer diagnosis and mortality. Bladder cancer risk was highest among patients in the two longest catheter duration quintiles (2.9-5.9 and 5.9-15.5 years). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to quantify the increase in bladder cancer incidence and mortality in a large, diverse cohort of patients with chronic indwelling or intermittent bladder catheterisation. The risk was highest among patients with a chronic catheter beyond 2.9 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Hird
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Refik Saskin
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Liu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuna Lee
- Division of General Internal Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Khaled Ajib
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rano Matta
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald Kodama
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lesley Carr
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sender Herschorn
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert K Nam
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Szwiec M, Tomiczek-Szwiec J, Kluźniak W, Wokołorczyk D, Osowiecka K, Sibilski R, Wachowiak M, Gronwald J, Gronwald H, Lubiński J, Cybulski C, Narod SA, Huzarski T. Genetic predisposition to male breast cancer in Poland. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:975. [PMID: 34461861 PMCID: PMC8406897 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08718-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer in men accounts for fewer than 1 % of all breast cancer cases diagnosed in men and women. Genes which predispose to male breast cancer include BRCA1 and BRCA2. The role of other genes is less clear. In Poland, 20 founder mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN, RECQL are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast cancer cases in women, but the utility this genes panel has not been tested in men. METHODS We estimated the prevalence of 20 alleles in six genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN, RECQL) in 165 Polish male breast cancer patients. We compared the frequency of selected variants in male breast cancer cases and controls. RESULTS One of the 20 mutations was seen in 22 of 165 cases (13.3%). Only one BRCA1 mutation and two BRCA2 mutations were found. We observed statistically significant associations for PALB2 and CHEK2 truncating mutations. A PALB2 mutation was detected in four cases (OR = 11.66; p < 0.001). A CHEK2 truncating mutation was detected in five cases (OR = 2.93;p = 0.02). CONCLUSION In conclusion, we recommend that a molecular test for BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and CHEK2 recurrent mutations should be offered to male breast cancer patients in Poland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Szwiec
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland.
| | | | - Wojciech Kluźniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokołorczyk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Karolina Osowiecka
- Department of Psychology and Sociology of Health and Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Al. Warszawska 30, 11-041, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Robert Sibilski
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Wachowiak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospital in Zielona Góra, Zyty 26, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental Physiotherapy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046, Zielona Góra, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Kim SJ, Lubinski J, Huzarski T, Møller P, Armel S, Karlan BY, Senter L, Eisen A, Foulkes WD, Singer CF, Tung N, Bordeleau L, Neuhausen SL, Olopade OI, Eng C, Weitzel JN, Fruscio R, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Weight Gain and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:2038-2043. [PMID: 34426412 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight gain and other anthropometric measures on the risk of ovarian cancer for women with BRCA mutations are not known. We conducted a prospective analysis of weight change since age 18, height, body mass index (BMI) at age 18, and current BMI and the risk of developing ovarian cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, height, weight, and weight at age 18 were collected at study enrollment. Weight was updated biennially. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer. RESULTS This study followed 4,340 women prospectively. There were 121 incident cases of ovarian cancer. Weight gain of more than 20 kg since age 18 was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of ovarian cancer, compared with women who maintained a stable weight (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.13-3.54; P = 0.02). Current BMI of 26.5 kg/m2 or greater was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers, compared with those with a BMI less than 20.8 kg/m2 (Q4 vs. Q1 HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04-4.36; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between height or BMI at age 18 and risk of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS Adult weight gain is a risk factor for ovarian cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. IMPACT These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight throughout adulthood in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, the Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | | | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Individuals with newly diagnosed cancer often have a high platelet count (thrombocytosis). Whether thrombocytosis is associated with the presence of an undiagnosed cancer remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess whether a new diagnosis of thrombocytosis is associated with a subsequent risk of cancer among adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using linked laboratory data from Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, with follow-up until December 31, 2018. The study cohort included adults aged 40 to 75 years on the date of a routine complete blood count (CBC) test (index test) who had a normal platelet count in the 2 previous years and no history of cancer. Data analysis was performed in December 2020. EXPOSURES Exposed individuals were those with a platelet count greater than 450 × 109/L. Matched unexposed control individuals had a platelet count within the reference range (150 × 109/L to 450 × 109/L) reported within 30 days of the exposure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incident cancers within 5 years after diagnosis of thrombocytosis. Absolute and relative risks for cancer associated with thrombocytosis were estimated for all cancers and for cancers at specific sites. RESULTS Of the 3 386 716 Ontario residents with a recorded routine CBC test result, 53 339 (1.6%) had thrombocytosis and a prior normal platelet count. Among individuals with thrombocytosis, the median age was 59.7 years (interquartile range, 50.2-67.4 years) and 37 349 (70.0%) were women. Among the 51 624 individuals with thrombocytosis included in the matched analysis, 2844 (5.5%) had received a diagnosis of a solid cancer in the 2-year follow-up period and 3869 (7.5%) had received a diagnosis within 5 years. The relative risk (RR) for developing any solid cancer within 2 years was 2.67 (95% CI, 2.56-2.79). Associations were found between thrombocytosis and cancers of the ovary (RR, 7.11; 95% CI, 5.59-9.03), stomach (RR, 5.53; 95% CI, 4.12-7.41), colon (RR, 5.41; 95% CI, 4.80-6.10), lung (RR, 4.41; 95% CI, 4.02-4.85), kidney (RR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.94-4.51), and esophagus (RR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.46-5.40). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, an increased platelet count was associated with an increased risk of cancer for at least 2 years. The results suggest that individuals with unexplained thrombocytosis should be offered screening for several cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Giannakeas V, Lim DW, Narod SA. The risk of contralateral breast cancer: a SEER-based analysis. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:601-610. [PMID: 34040177 PMCID: PMC8368197 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01417-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to estimate the annual risk and 25-year cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer. METHODS We identified 812,851 women with unilateral breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 2015 in the SEER database and followed them for contralateral breast cancer for up to 25 years. Women with a known bilateral mastectomy were excluded. We calculated the annual risk of contralateral breast cancer by age at diagnosis, by time since diagnosis and by current age. We compared risks by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive disease, by race and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status of the first cancer. RESULTS There were 25,958 cases of contralateral invasive breast cancer diagnosed (3.2% of all patients). The annual risk of contralateral breast cancer over the 25-year follow-up period was 0.37% and the 25-year actuarial risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer was 9.9%. The annual risk varied to a small degree by age of diagnosis, by time elapsed since diagnosis and by current age. The 25-year actuarial risk was similar for DCIS and invasive breast cancer patients (10.1 versus 9.9%). The 25-year actuarial risk was higher for black women (12.7%) than for white women (9.7%) and was lower for women with ER-positive breast cancer (9.5%) than for women with ER-negative breast cancer (11.2%). CONCLUSIONS Women with unilateral breast cancer experience an annual risk of contralateral breast cancer ~0.4% per year, which persists over the 25-year follow-up period.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/metabolism
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Risk Factors
- SEER Program
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Lim DW, Giannakeas V, Narod SA. Survival Differences in Chinese Versus White Women With Breast Cancer in the United States: A SEER-Based Analysis. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 6:1582-1592. [PMID: 33079607 PMCID: PMC7605368 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The affect of race on breast cancer prognosis is not well understood. We compared crude and adjusted breast cancer survival rates of Chinese women versus White women in the United States. METHODS We conducted a cohort study of Chinese and White women with breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 to 2015 in the SEER 18 registries database. We abstracted information on age at diagnosis, tumor size, grade, lymph node status, receptor status, surgical treatment, receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and death. We compared crude breast cancer–specific mortality between the two ethnic groups. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) in a propensity-matched design using the Cox proportional hazards model. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were 7,553 Chinese women (1.8%) and 414,618 White women (98.2%) with stage I-IV breast cancer in the SEER database. There were small differences in demographics, nodal burden, and clinical stage between Chinese and White women. Ten-year breast cancer–specific survival was 88.8% for Chinese women and 85.6% for White women (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.80; P < .0001). In a propensity-matched analysis among women with stage I–IIIC breast cancer, the HR was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.81; P < .0001). Annual mortality rates in White women exceeded those in Chinese women for the first 9 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION Chinese women in the United States have superior breast cancer–specific survival compared with White women. The reason for the observed difference is not clear. Differences in demographic and tumor features between Chinese and White women with breast cancer may contribute to the disparity, as may the possibility of intrinsic biologic differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Xia YY, Lubinski J, Rosen B, Moller P, Eisen A, Ainsworth P, Senter L, Bordeleau L, Neuhausen SL, Singer CF, Brooks J, Sun P, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Abstract 878: Contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A prospective cohort study. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Oral contraceptive use is associated with a significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. To date, there have been no prospective analyses of this relationship, and the impact of other types of contraception (e.g. intrauterine device (IUD), implant, patch, injection) on BRCA-associated ovarian cancer risk is unknown. The goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate the relationship between types of contraception and ovarian cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Methods: The longitudinal study included 3,298 eligible BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Self-reported information regarding contraceptive use, including medication name, start year, end year, duration of use and method of administration were collected by biennial questionnaire. Women were classified according to history of contraceptive use (ever/never), duration of use, contraceptive method, calendar year of initiation and time since last use. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ovarian cancer associated with each contraceptive method.
Results: There were 84 incident ovarian cancer cases diagnosed over a mean follow-up period of 5.1 years. There was no significant association between ever use of an IUD (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.28-2.14) and risk of ovarian cancer compared to IUD never users. Ongoing analyses will focus on the relationships between other contraceptive methods, formulations and duration of use on ovarian cancer risk, further stratified by histology and site of origin.
Conclusions: Preliminary findings from this prospective analysis suggest that IUD use may not be protective among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Ongoing results will elucidate the impact of contraceptive formulation and method on ovarian cancer risk to inform clinical recommendations surrounding the use of contraceptive agents for chemoprevention in high risk women.
Citation Format: Yue Yin Xia, Jan Lubinski, Barry Rosen, Pal Moller, Andrea Eisen, Peter Ainsworth, Leigha Senter, Louise Bordeleau, Susan L. Neuhausen, Christian F. Singer, Jennifer Brooks, Ping Sun, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos. Contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 878.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Yin Xia
- 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- 2Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | | | - Andrea Eisen
- 5Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Leigha Senter
- 7The Ohio State University Medical Center, Colombus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - Ping Sun
- 11Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Pullella K, Harris SA, McLaughlin JR, Lubinski J, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Abstract 857: Evaluating the relationship between arsenic exposure and cancer risk in Canada. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Arsenic is an established carcinogen for cancers of the skin, bladder and lungs; it is also the most prevalent environmental toxin, resulting in all Canadians being exposed to some extent. In a recent prospective study of a low-exposure population, our team found that women in the highest quartile of circulating arsenic had a significant 13-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, compared to the lowest quartile. This suggests that even at low-doses, arsenic may be an important risk factor for breast, and potentially other cancers not previously recognized. To date, the sources of arsenic in Canada, a low-exposure population, are unclear.
Objectives: To describe the status of arsenic exposure, identify the key predictors of arsenic status, and evaluate the relationship between arsenic exposure and cancer risk within the Canadian population.
Methods: Using data from Cycles 1-5 (2007-2017) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS), exposure data (e.g., diet, water), demographic information, and urinary arsenic biomarkers will be analyzed. The CHMS is an ongoing, nationally representative survey, collecting objective health measures and food intake information from participants in biennial cycles. Data will be described using weighted percentages or means, and arsenic levels (total and speciated urinary arsenic metabolite concentrations) will be reported by percentile. Weighted multivariate regression models will be used to identify predictors of total urinary arsenic. Linkage to the Canadian Cancer Registry will be performed to ascertain incident cancers, and Cox proportional hazards regression used to estimate the relationship between arsenic status and cancer risk (total and site-specific).
Results: This analysis included 15,700 individuals, aged 18-80. The median total urinary arsenic level was 7.5 ug/g of creatinine. Significant predictors of total urinary arsenic levels were found to be weekly intake of fish and seafood (β= 0.3, 95%CI 0.27,0.33, P < 0.001), grains (β=-0.02, 95%CI -0.02, -0.01, P< 0.001) and consumption of well and/or cistern water (β = 0.13, 95%CI 0.04, 0.22, P=0.005). Linkage and data analysis are ongoing.
Impact: This work is the first to ascertain national exposure estimates to an environmental carcinogen. Fish, seafood, grains, and consumption of well and/or cistern water represent significant predictors of total urinary arsenic levels in Canada. Ultimately, this information is needed to develop critical population-level intervention strategies to reduce the Canadian, and global burden of cancer.
Citation Format: Katherine Pullella, Shelley A. Harris, John R. McLaughlin, Jan Lubinski, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos. Evaluating the relationship between arsenic exposure and cancer risk in Canada [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - John R. McLaughlin
- 2CanPath, Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow Project, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- 3Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A. Narod
- 4Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- 4Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Kotsopoulos J, Kim SJ, Armel S, Bordeleau L, Foulkes WD, McKinnon W, Panchal S, Cohen SA, Sun S, Sun P, McKetton L, Troyer AK, Narod SA. An evaluation of memory and attention in BRCA mutation carriers using an online cognitive assessment tool. Cancer 2021; 127:3183-3193. [PMID: 34077552 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of various surgical, hormonal, and lifestyle factors on memory and attention in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS BRCA mutation carriers enrolled in a longitudinal study were invited to complete an online brain health assessment tool designed to screen for cognitive deficits. Four measures of memory and executive attention were assessed individually, and an overall score was compiled adjusting for age. Exposures, including preventive surgery, hormone use, and lifestyle factors, were captured by questionnaire. Performance on each of the 5 subtasks was analyzed according to various exposures. Analysis of covariance was used to compare overall scores. RESULTS In total, 880 women completed the online cognitive assessment. The average age of the participants was 54 years (range, 23-86 years). The mean overall test score was 54.4 (range, 0-93). The individual subtask scores declined with age at test completion (P < .0001) and increased with level of education (P ≤ .01). Women who underwent a preventive oophorectomy had a significantly higher overall score compared with women who did not undergo this surgery (55.5 vs 50.5; P = .01). Reconstructive breast surgery was also associated with a higher overall score (56.5 vs 52.3; P = .005). Chemotherapy and hormone-replacement therapy were not predictive of the overall score. CONCLUSIONS These findings are reassuring to high-risk women who undergo early surgical menopause for their cancer predisposition. Further studies are needed to evaluate cognitive function over time when memory deficits become more prevalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wendy McKinnon
- Familial Cancer Program, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Cohen
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sophie Sun
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Angela K Troyer
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Mejia-Gomez J, Gronwald J, Senter L, Karlan BY, Tung N, Wolfman W, Demsky R, Sun P, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Factors associated with use of hormone therapy after preventive oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 27:1396-1402. [PMID: 32796289 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (oophorectomy) is recommended to women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation before natural menopause to prevent ovarian and fallopian tube cancer. The adverse effects of early surgical menopause are well established. Although many of the side effects can be ameliorated by the use of hormone therapy (HT); use of HT in this group of predominantly young patients remains suboptimal. The goal of this study was to identify the frequency of HT use, as well as predictors of HT uptake in BRCA mutation carriers who underwent preventive oophorectomy before natural menopause. METHODS Eligible participants were identified from a longitudinal study of BRCA mutation carriers. We included premenopausal women with no personal history of cancer who underwent oophorectomy before age 50 and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Detailed information on HT use and other important variables was collected by a research questionnaire every 2 years. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the use of HT in various subgroups. RESULTS A total of 793 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were included in this analysis. The mean age at oophorectomy was 42 years (range 28-49). Sixty-one percent of the women reported using HT after oophorectomy. Factors associated with HT use included young age at surgery, a high level of education and preventive mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of HT after oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation varies by age, education, and surgical history. Clinician and patient awareness may lead to better utilization of HT in women who undergo oophorectomy at an early age to help mitigate the adverse effects associated with surgical menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Mejia-Gomez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, the Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Wendy Wolfman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rochelle Demsky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Poll A, Candib A, McCready D, Cil T, Wright F, Demsky R, Mancuso T, Sun P, Narod SA. Frequency of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients with a Negative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Rapid Genetic Test Result. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4967-4973. [PMID: 33761021 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09855-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing desire for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer. It is unknown if risk assessment and genetic testing at the time of diagnosis will aid women in their surgical choice. We report on the uptake and predictors of CPM in women receiving a negative genetic test result for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations before surgery. METHODS Women diagnosed with breast cancer between June 2013 and May 2018 were recruited from four academic health sciences centers in Toronto, Canada. Genetic counseling (risk assessment) and genetic testing was performed prior to surgery. Women were asked about their surgical preference before surgery. At 1 year post-surgery we asked what surgery was completed. This study reports on women who received a negative BRCA1/BRCA2 result. RESULTS A total of 766 women with a mean age of 46 years (range 21-82) were included in the analysis. Before genetic counseling and testing, 37% of the women were undecided or leaning towards CPM; however, after receiving a negative BRCA test, 15% of the women opted for CPM. Thirty percent of women whose mother died of breast cancer elected for CPM, compared with 15% of women whose mother did not die of breast cancer (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Women receiving a risk assessment and negative BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test result before surgery use this information to guide their surgical decision. Uptake of CPM for women who were planning on CPM before genetic testing decreases after receiving a negative BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aletta Poll
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Candib
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David McCready
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tulin Cil
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rochelle Demsky
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Talia Mancuso
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
George SHL, Donenberg T, Alexis C, DeGennaro V, Dyer H, Yin S, Ali J, Butler R, Chin SN, Curling D, Lowe D, Lunn J, Turnquest T, Wharfe G, Cerbon D, Barreto-Coelho P, Schlumbrecht MP, Akbari MR, Narod SA, Hurley JE. Gene Sequencing for Pathogenic Variants Among Adults With Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the Caribbean. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e210307. [PMID: 33646313 PMCID: PMC7921902 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Rates of breast and ovarian cancer are high in the Caribbean; however, to date, few published data quantify the prevalence of inherited cancer in the Caribbean population. OBJECTIVE To determine whether deleterious variants in genes that characterize the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome are associated with the development of breast and ovarian cancer in the English- and Creole-speaking Caribbean populations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multisite genetic association study used data from germline genetic test results between June 2010 and June 2018 in the Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Barbados, Dominica, Jamaica, Haiti, and Trinidad and Tobago. Next-generation sequencing on a panel of 30 genes and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (BRCA1 and BRCA2) were performed. Medical records were reviewed at time of study enrollment. Women and men diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancer with at least 1 grandparent born in the participating study sites were included; 1018 individuals were eligible and consented to participate in this study. Data were analyzed from November 4, 2019, to May 6, 2020. EXPOSURES Breast and/or ovarian cancer diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Rate of inherited breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and spectrum and types of variants. RESULTS Of 1018 participants, 999 (98.1%) had breast cancer (mean [SD] age, 46.6 [10.8] years) and 21 (2.1%) had ovarian cancer (mean [SD] age, 47.6 [13.5] years). Three individuals declined to have their results reported. A total of 144 of 1015 (14.2%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome gene. A total of 64% of variant carriers had P/LP variant in BRCA1, 23% in BRCA2, 9% in PALB2 and 4% in RAD51C, CHEK2, ATM, STK11 and NBN. The mean (SD) age of variant carriers was 40.7 (9.2) compared with 47.5 (10.7) years in noncarriers. Individuals in the Bahamas had the highest proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (23%), followed by Barbados (17.9%), Trinidad (12%), Dominica (8.8%), Haiti (6.7%), Cayman Islands (6.3%), and Jamaica (4.9%). In Caribbean-born women and men with breast cancer, having a first- or second-degree family member with breast cancer was associated with having any BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variant (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.24-2.01; P < .001). A BRCA1 vs BRCA2 variant was more strongly associated with triple negative breast cancer (odds ratio, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.05-19.54; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, among Caribbean-born individuals with breast and ovarian cancer, 1 in 7 had hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer varied by island and ranged from 23% in the Bahamas to 4.9% in Jamaica. Each island had a distinctive set of variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H. L. George
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Leonard Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Talia Donenberg
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Leonard Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
- Department of Genetics, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Cheryl Alexis
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of West Indies-Cave Hill, Barbados
| | | | - Hedda Dyer
- Ross University School of Medicine, Commonwealth of Dominica (now in Barbados)
| | - Sook Yin
- Cayman Islands Cancer Society, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
| | - Jameel Ali
- St. James Medical Complex, Northwest Regional Health Authority, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Raleigh Butler
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University of the West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, Bahamas
| | - Sheray N. Chin
- Department of Pathology, University of West Indies-Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - DuVaughn Curling
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University of the West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, Bahamas
| | - Dwight Lowe
- Department of Pathology, University of West Indies-Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - John Lunn
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University of the West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, Bahamas
| | - Theodore Turnquest
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University of the West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, Bahamas
| | - Gilian Wharfe
- Department of Pathology, University of West Indies-Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Danielle Cerbon
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Priscila Barreto-Coelho
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Matthew P. Schlumbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Leonard Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Mohammad R. Akbari
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Judith E. Hurley
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
- Leonard Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Lener MR, Reszka E, Marciniak W, Lesicka M, Baszuk P, Jabłońska E, Białkowska K, Muszyńska M, Pietrzak S, Derkacz R, Grodzki T, Wójcik J, Wojtyś M, Dębniak T, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Kubisa B, Pieróg J, Waloszczyk P, Scott RJ, Jakubowska A, Narod SA, Lubiński J. Blood cadmium levels as a marker for early lung cancer detection. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2021; 64:126682. [PMID: 33249371 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed whether blood cadmium levels were associated with incident lung cancer and could be used in the context of a screening program for early-stage lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS We measured blood cadmium levels among 205 lung cancer patients and 205 matched controls. Cases and controls were matched for sex, age and smoking history (total pack-years, years since cessation for former smokers). RESULTS The odds ratio for those in the highest quartile of cadmium level (versus lowest) was four-fold (OR = 4.41, 95 % CI:2.01-9.67, p < 0.01). The association was present in former smokers (OR = 16.8, 95 % CI:3.96-71.2, p < 0.01), but not in current smokers (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI: 0.34-4.38) or in never smokers (OR not defined). Among former smokers, the association was present in both early- and late-stage lung cancer. CONCLUSION Blood cadmium levels may be a marker to help with the early detection of lung cancer among former smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin R Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Edyta Reszka
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, ul.św. Teresy od Dzieciątka Jezus 8, 91-348 Łódź, Poland
| | - Wojciech Marciniak
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Monika Lesicka
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, ul.św. Teresy od Dzieciątka Jezus 8, 91-348 Łódź, Poland
| | - Piotr Baszuk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Ewa Jabłońska
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, ul.św. Teresy od Dzieciątka Jezus 8, 91-348 Łódź, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Sandra Pietrzak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Róża Derkacz
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Tomasz Grodzki
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. A. Sokołowskiego 11, 70-891 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Janusz Wójcik
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. A. Sokołowskiego 11, 70-891 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Wojtyś
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. A. Sokołowskiego 11, 70-891 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland
| | - Bartosz Kubisa
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. A. Sokołowskiego 11, 70-891 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jarosław Pieróg
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. A. Sokołowskiego 11, 70-891 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Piotr Waloszczyk
- Independent Laboratory of Pathology, Zdunomed, ul. Energetyków 2, 70-656 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rodney J Scott
- Medical Genetics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research, Innovation and Translation, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Pathology North, John Hunter Hospital, Cnr King and Auckland Streets, Newcastle NSW 2300 Australia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra (Szczecińska), Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Lim DW, Giannakeas V, Narod SA. Abstract PS7-39: Survival differences in chinese versus white women with breast cancer in the United States: A SEER-based analysis. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps7-39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Several studies have reported lower breast cancer survival rates among Black women compared to White women, but less is known regarding outcomes in Chinese women. We compared survival rates for Chinese and White women with breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2015.
Methods: We conducted a cohort study of Chinese and White women with breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 to 2015 in the SEER18 registries database. We abstracted information on age and year of diagnosis, marital status, median household income, tumour size and grade, lymph node status, clinical stage, receptor status (estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2/neu receptor), surgical treatment (lumpectomy versus mastectomy), receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and death. Chinese and White women were compared for demographic, pathologic and treatment variables and differences were assessed using standardized differences. Our primary outcome was death from breast cancer. We compared crude breast cancer-specific mortality rates between the two ethnic groups. We also calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) in a propensity-matched design using the Cox proportional hazards model. Women were matched on the year of diagnosis and age at diagnosis (both within 2 years), tumour grade, nodal status, clinical stage, estrogen receptor status, HER2/neu status and propensity score. The propensity score accounted for marital status, household income, tumour size, progesterone receptor status and surgical procedure. A log-rank test was used to compare differences between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: There were 7,553 Chinese women (1.8%) and 414,618 White women (98.2%) with stage I-IV breast cancer registered in the SEER database. There were only small differences in tumour size, stage at presentation, node-positivity, the proportion of HER2-positive cancers, and the treatments received. Among women with stage I-IIIC breast cancer, 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 88.8% for Chinese women, compared with 85.6% for White women. The cumulative mortality from breast cancer after 11 years of follow-up was 12.9% for Chinese women and 16.4% for White women; crude HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.80; P < .0001). In the first nine years after diagnosis, annual mortality rates are higher in White women than for Chinese women. Following the first nine years after diagnosis, the annual mortality rate for Chinese women then exceeds that of White women. In a propensity-matched analysis, the cumulative mortality from breast cancer after 11 years of follow-up was 8.9% for Chinese women and 11.9% for White women (P = .0002). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.71 (95% CI 0.62 - 0.81) and was similar to the crude hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.90). The adjusted hazard ratios demonstrate that Chinese women had better survival than White women in subgroups defined by age of diagnosis, tumour size and grade, clinical stage, nodal status and estrogen receptor status. The largest effects were observed for stage I cancers (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.90) and for node-negative cancers (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.82).
Conclusion: Chinese women diagnosed with breast cancer in the SEER database between 2004 to 2015 had significantly better survival rates than White women with breast cancer. Over a 10-year follow-up period, Chinese women with stage I-IIIC breast cancer experienced a 30% lower risk of death than a comparable group of White women with breast cancer. The observed difference cannot be accounted for by clinical presentation or by differences in treatment and suggests that there are intrinsic biological differences in breast cancer between Chinese and White women.
Citation Format: David Wai Lim, Vasily Giannakeas, Steven A Narod. Survival differences in chinese versus white women with breast cancer in the United States: A SEER-based analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-39.
Collapse
|
67
|
Abstract
Importance Rates of bilateral mastectomy continue to increase in average-risk women with unilateral in situ and invasive breast cancer. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates increased from 5% to 12% of all operations for breast cancer in the US from 2004 to 2012. Among women having mastectomy, rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy have increased from less than 2% in 1998 to 30% in 2012. Observations The increased use of breast magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing has marginally increased the number of candidates for bilateral mastectomy. Most bilateral mastectomies are performed on women who are at no special risk for contralateral cancer. The true risk of contralateral breast cancer is not associated with the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; rather, the clinical factors associated with the probability of distant recurrence are associated with bilateral mastectomy. Several changes in society and health care delivery appear to act concurrently and synergistically. First, the anxiety engendered by a fear of cancer recurrence is focused on the contralateral cancer because this is most easily conceptualized and provides a ready target that can be acted upon. Second, the modern woman with breast cancer is supported by the surgeon and the social community of breast cancer survivors. Surgeons want to respect patient autonomy, despite guidelines discouraging bilateral mastectomy, and most women have their expenses covered by a third-party payer. Satisfaction with the results is high, but the association with improved psychosocial well-being remains to be fully understood. Conclusions and Relevance Reducing the use of medically unnecessary contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with nonhereditary, unilateral breast cancer requires a social change that addresses patient-, physician-, cultural-, and systems-level enabling factors. Such a transformation begins with educating clinicians and patients. The concerns of women who want preventive contralateral mastectomy must be explored, and women need to be informed of the anticipated benefits (or lack thereof) and risks. Areas requiring further study are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelly A Metcalfe
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
|
69
|
Kim SR, Kotsopoulos J, Sun P, Bernardini MQ, Laframboise S, Ferguson SE, Rosen B, Narod SA, May T. The impacts of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and of cytoreductive surgery on 10-year survival from advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 153:417-423. [PMID: 33326624 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term survival outcomes for women with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy either before or after surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs primary cytoreductive surgery) at a single tertiary cancer center. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 326 patients with Stage IIIC or IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery between 2001 and 2011. Clinical treatments were recorded and 10-year survival rates were measured. RESULTS A total of 183 women (56.1%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and 143 women (43.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to have no residual disease than those who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery (51.4% vs 41.5%; P = 0.030) but experienced inferior 10-year overall survival (9.1% vs 19.3%; P < 0.001). Among those who had primary cytoreductive surgery, those with no residual disease had superior 10-year overall survival than those who had any evidence of residual disease (36.0% vs 7.2%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Among women with advanced ovarian cancer, those who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery had better survival than those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be reserved for those in whom optimal primary cytoreductive surgery is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephane Laframboise
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Barry Rosen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Beaumont Health System, Grosse Pointe, MI, USA
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Networks, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Narod SA. Mammography screening for breast cancer-the UK Age trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e508. [PMID: 33152300 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30490-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Steven A. Narod, MD, and Vasily Giannakeas, MPH, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Steven A. Narod, MD, and Vasily Giannakeas, MPH, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Mansfield CA, Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Lindeman GJ, Posner J, Friedman S, Lynch HT, Narod SA, Evans DG, Liede A. Preferences for breast cancer prevention among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2020; 18:20. [PMID: 33014209 PMCID: PMC7526374 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-00152-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have high lifetime risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer. The decision to embark on risk reduction strategies is a difficult and personal one. We surveyed an international group of women with BRCA mutations and measured choices and sequence of breast cancer risk reduction strategies. Methods Women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and no previous cancer diagnosis were recruited from the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, and from a national advocacy group. Using an online survey, we asked about cancer-risk reduction preferences including for one of two hypothetical medicines, randomly assigned, and women’s recommendations for a hypothetical woman (Susan, either a 25- or 36-year-old). Sunburst diagrams were generated to illustrate hierarchy of choices. Results Among 598 respondents, mean age was 40.9 years (range 25–55 years). Timing of the survey was 4.8 years (mean) after learning their positive test result and 33% had risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) and bilateral mastectomy (RRBM), while 19% had RRBSO only and 16% had RRBM only. Although 30% said they would take a hypothetical medicine, 6% reported taking a medicine resembling tamoxifen. Respondents were 1.5 times more likely to select a hypothetical medicine for risk reduction when Susan was 25 than when Susan was 36. Women assigned to 36-year-old Susan were more likely to choose a medicine if they had a family member diagnosed with breast cancer and personal experience taking tamoxifen. Conclusions Women revealed a willingness to undergo surgeries to achieve largest reduction in breast cancer risk, although this would not be recommended for a younger woman in her 20s. The goal of achieving the highest degree of cancer risk reduction is the primary driver for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in selecting an intervention and a sequence of interventions, regardless of whether it is non-surgical or surgical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol A Mansfield
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, 3040 Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Durham, NC 27709-12194 USA
| | - Kelly A Metcalfe
- Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carrie Snyder
- Creighton University, Omaha, NE USA.,CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE USA
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia.,The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - Joshua Posner
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, 3040 Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Durham, NC 27709-12194 USA
| | - Sue Friedman
- Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE) Advocacy Organization, Tampa, Florida USA
| | | | | | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Hird AE, Magee DE, Matta R, Saskin R, Dvorani E, Kulkarni GS, Kodama R, Herschorn S, Narod SA, Nam RK. Assessment of Secondary Sarcomas Among Patients With Cancer of the Abdomen or Pelvis Who Received Combinations of Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy vs Surgery Alone. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2013929. [PMID: 33006617 PMCID: PMC7532387 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The association of radiation and chemotherapy with the development of secondary sarcoma is known, but the contemporary risk has not been well characterized for patients with cancers of the abdomen and pelvis. OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of secondary sarcoma among patients treated with combinations of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy with patients treated with surgery alone and the general population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study included 173 580 patients in Ontario, Canada, with nonmetastatic cancer of the prostate, bladder, colon, rectum or anus, cervix, uterus, or testis. Patients were enrolled from January 1, 2002, to January 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. EXPOSURES Treatment combinations of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Diagnosis of sarcoma based on histologic codes from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Time to sarcoma was compared using a cause-specific proportional hazard model. RESULTS Of 173 580 patients, most were men (125 080 [72.1%]), and the largest group was aged between 60 and 69 years (58 346 [33.6%]). Most patients had genitourinary cancer (86 235 [51.4%]) or colorectal cancer (69 241 [39.9%]). Overall, 64 301 (37.1%) received surgery alone, 51 220 (29.5%) received radiation alone, 15 624 (9.0%) were treated with radiation and chemotherapy, 15 252 (8.8%) received radiation with surgery, and 11 822 (6.8%) received all 3 treatments. A total of 332 patients (0.2%) had sarcomas develop during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 5.7 (2.2-8.9) years. The incidence of sarcoma was 0.3% among those who underwent radiation alone (138 of 51 220) and radiation with chemotherapy (40 of 15 624), 0.2% among those who received radiation and surgery (36 of 15 252) and all 3 modalities (25 of 11 822), and 0.1% among those who received surgery with chemotherapy (13 of 14 861) and surgery alone (80 of 64 801). Compared with a reference group of patients who had surgery alone, the greatest risk of sarcoma was found among patients who underwent a combination of radiation and chemotherapy (cause-specific relative hazard [csRH], 4.07; 95% CI, 2.75-6.01; P < .001), followed by patients who had radiation alone (csRH, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.77-3.12; P < .001), radiation with surgery (csRH, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.57-3.46; P < .001), and all 3 modalities (csRH, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.44-3.58; P < .001). In the general population, 7987 events occurred during 46 554 803 person-years (17.2 events per 100 000 person-years). The standardized incidence ratio for sarcoma among patients treated with radiation compared with the general population was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.57-3.69; 41.3 events per 100 000 person-years). The annual number of cases of sarcoma increased from 2009 (15 per 100 000 persons) to 2016 (32 per 100 000 persons), but the annual rate did not change during the study period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, patients treated with radiation or chemotherapy for abdominopelvic cancers had an increased rate of sarcoma. Although the absolute rate is low, patients and physicians should be aware of this increased risk of developing sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E. Hird
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana E. Magee
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rano Matta
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Refik Saskin
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erind Dvorani
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S. Kulkarni
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald Kodama
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sender Herschorn
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert K. Nam
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Poll A, Candib A, McCready D, Cil T, Wright F, Lerner-Ellis J, McCuaig J, Graham T, Sun P, Akbari M, Narod SA. Rapid Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations at the Time of Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Observational Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2219-2226. [PMID: 32989658 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09160-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the impact of rapid genetic testing (RGT) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis on treatment choices. Bilateral mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation offers a reduction in the risk of contralateral breast cancer. It is unclear whether offering RGT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis has an impact on women's surgical decision-making. METHODS Women with breast cancer diagnosed between June 2013 and May 2018 were recruited from four academic health sciences centers in Toronto, Canada. The participants completed a questionnaire before genetic testing, then one week and one year after disclosure of the genetic test result. Before surgery, RGT was performed. Diagnostic, pathologic, and treatment data were compared between those with and those without a BRCA mutation. RESULTS The study enrolled 1007 women who consented to RGT. The mean age of the participants was 46.3 years, and the median time to result disclosure was 10 days. A BRCA mutation was found in 6% of the women. The women with a BRCA mutation were significantly more likely to elect for bilateral mastectomy than the women without a BRCA mutation (p < 0.0001). Of the BRCA-positive patients, 95.7% reported that they used their genetic test result to make a surgical decision. CONCLUSIONS The women provided with RGT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis use the genetic information to make treatment decisions, and the majority of those identified with a BRCA mutation elect for a bilateral mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aletta Poll
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Tulin Cil
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Graham
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
Trister R, Jacobson M, Nguyen P, Sobel M, Allen L, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Patient reported experiences following laparoscopic prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy in an ambulatory care hospital. Fam Cancer 2020; 20:103-110. [PMID: 32964297 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00208-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Women at risk of developing ovarian cancer because of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant are candidates for prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). While BSO surgeries are routinely performed, to our knowledge there are no studies that have examined patient-reported experiences following laparoscopic BSO performed in an ambulatory care setting. The objective of this study was to examine whether women undergoing prophylactic laparoscopic BSO felt they were adequately informed about post-operative outcomes. A telephone interview was conducted among 46 women undergoing laparoscopic BSO to collect detailed information regarding surgical outcomes, complications, symptoms, and time to return to daily activities. The average age at surgery was 45.0 years (range 34-66) and 67% of women underwent BSO prior to age 50. The mean reported hospital stay was 7.2 h (range 4-12 h) and at time of discharge, 78% of the women felt well enough to go home. None of the women required a readmission to hospital. Forty-three percent (n = 20) of the women did not feel well informed about what to expect post-operatively. Most of the patient-reported outcomes (including pain, vaginal bleeding, and nausea/vomiting) were expected and patient-reported menopausal symptoms were more common among women who were premenopausal at surgery. In terms of returning to regular activities, premenopausal women (n = 36) resumed sexual activity on average at 43 days (range 2-365), which is later than postmenopausal women (n = 15) at 19 days (range 7-30). On average, women returned to full-time work in 16 days (range 1-56 days). Despite patients receiving pre-surgery counselling, our findings suggest that there is a need to provide supplemental, reinforcing patient materials in preparing patients for what to expect after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Trister
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patricia Nguyen
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Room 6423, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Mara Sobel
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Allen
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Room 6423, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Room 6423, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada. .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Olafsdottir EJ, Borg A, Jensen MB, Gerdes AM, Johansson ALV, Barkardottir RB, Johannsson OT, Ejlertsen B, Sønderstrup IMH, Hovig E, Lænkholm AV, Hansen TVO, Olafsdottir GH, Rossing M, Jonasson JG, Sigurdsson S, Loman N, Nilsson MP, Narod SA, Tryggvadottir L. Breast cancer survival in Nordic BRCA2 mutation carriers-unconventional association with oestrogen receptor status. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:1608-1615. [PMID: 32939053 PMCID: PMC7686356 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The natural history of breast cancer among BRCA2 carriers has not been clearly established. In a previous study from Iceland, positive ER status was a negative prognostic factor. We sought to identify factors that predicted survival after invasive breast cancer in an expanded cohort of BRCA2 carriers. Methods We studied 608 women with invasive breast cancer and a pathogenic BRCA2 mutation (variant) from four Nordic countries. Information on prognostic factors and treatment was retrieved from health records and by analysis of archived tissue specimens. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for breast cancer-specific survival using Cox regression. Results About 77% of cancers were ER-positive, with the highest proportion (83%) in patients under 40 years. ER-positive breast cancers were more likely to be node-positive (59%) than ER-negative cancers (34%) (P < 0.001). The survival analysis included 584 patients. Positive ER status was protective in the first 5 years from diagnosis (multivariate HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26–0.93, P = 0.03); thereafter, the effect was adverse (HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.07–3.39, P = 0.03). The adverse effect of positive ER status was limited to women who did not undergo endocrine treatment (HR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.26–4.44, P = 0.01) and patients with intact ovaries (HR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.11–3.59, P = 0.02). Conclusions The adverse effect of a positive ER status in BRCA2 carriers with breast cancer may be contingent on exposure to ovarian hormones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ake Borg
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, BMC, Laeknagardur, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Oskar T Johannsson
- Department of Oncology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Maria Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jon G Jonasson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Stefan Sigurdsson
- Cancer Research Laboratory, BMC, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Niklas Loman
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Steven A Narod
- Womens' College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laufey Tryggvadottir
- Icelandic Cancer Registry, Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland. .,Faculty of Medicine, BMC, Laeknagardur, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Wokołorczyk D, Kluźniak W, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Szymiczek A, Rusak B, Stempa K, Gliniewicz K, Kashyap A, Morawska S, Dębniak T, Jakubowska A, Szwiec M, Domagała P, Lubiński J, Narod SA, Akbari MR, Cybulski C. Mutations in ATM, NBN and BRCA2 predispose to aggressive prostate cancer in Poland. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:2793-2800. [PMID: 32875559 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In designing national strategies for genetic testing, it is important to define the full spectrum of pathogenic mutations in prostate cancer (PCa) susceptibility genes. To investigate the frequency of mutations in PCa susceptibility genes in Polish familial PCa cases and to estimate gene-related PCa risks and probability of aggressive disease, we analyzed the coding regions of 14 genes by exome sequencing in 390 men with familial prostate cancer and 308 cancer-free controls. We compared the mutation frequencies between PCa cases and controls. We also compared clinical characteristics of prostate cancers between mutation carriers and noncarriers. Of the 390 PCa cases, 76 men (19.5%) carried a mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, NBN, ATM, CHEK2, HOXB13, MSH2 or MSH6 genes. No mutations were found in BRIP1, PTEN, TP53, MLH1, PMS2 and SPOP. Significant associations with familial PCa risk were observed for CHEK2, NBN, ATM, and HOXB13. High-grade (Gleason 8-10) tumors were seen in 56% of BRCA2, NBN or ATM carriers, compared to 21% of patients who tested negative for mutations in these genes (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 2.0-10.7, P = .0003). In summary, approximately 20% of familial prostate cancer cases in Poland can be attributed to mutations in eight susceptibility genes. Carriers of mutations in BRCA2, NBN and ATM develop aggressive disease and may benefit from intensified screening and/or chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Wokołorczyk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Wojciech Kluźniak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Agata Szymiczek
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bogna Rusak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Klaudia Stempa
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Gliniewicz
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Aniruddh Kashyap
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sylwia Morawska
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.,Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marek Szwiec
- Clinics of Oncology, University Hospital in Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Paweł Domagała
- Department of Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mohammad R Akbari
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE It is not clear to what extent a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts a woman's lifetime risk of dying of breast cancer. Under ideal circumstances, treatment will eliminate the risk of invasive ipsilateral recurrence and prevent subsequent mortality from breast cancer. The risk of dying of breast cancer after a diagnosis of DCIS had not been compared with that of women without cancer in the general population. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk of death from breast cancer in a large cohort of patients treated for DCIS and to compare the risk with that of women in the general population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included data for women who had first primary DCIS diagnosed between 1995 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries database. Women with DCIS underwent surgical treatment, and approximately half also received radiotherapy. These women were followed from the date of DCIS diagnosis until death from breast cancer or date of last follow-up. Women in the general population without breast cancer were analyzed as controls. Follow-up information was available up to December 2016. The data were analyzed in March 2020. EXPOSURES Patients with DCIS who underwent surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Breast cancer death was the main outcome. Standardized mortality ratios were estimated by comparing deaths from breast cancer among women diagnosed with DCIS with expected deaths from breast cancer among women in the general population who did not have cancer. Expected probability of death from breast cancer in the general population was calculated by an incidence-based mortality approach using standardized SEER-based incidence and case-fatality rates. Probability of breast cancer death was estimated based on the assumption that a cancer-free control was cancer free on the date the woman with DCIS was diagnosed and was studied until the end of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 144 524 women diagnosed with first primary DCIS were included (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 57.4 [11.0] years). There were 1540 deaths from breast cancer in the cohort. Based on SEER-based incidence and case-fatality rates, 458 breast cancer deaths were expected in an equivalent number of cancer-free women from the general population with equal follow-up. The standardized mortality ratio for death from breast cancer among women with DCIS was 3.36 (95% CI, 3.20-3.53). The elevated risk of death persisted more than 15 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the population studied, the risk of dying of breast cancer was increased 3-fold after a diagnosis of DCIS. This suggests that our current treatment focus on preventing invasive recurrence is insufficient to eliminate all deaths from breast cancer after DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victoria Sopik
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Rogoża-Janiszewska E, Malińska K, Cybulski C, Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Lener M, Górski B, Kluźniak W, Rudnicka H, Akbari MR, Kashyap A, Narod SA, Lubiński J, Dębniak T. Prevalence of Recurrent Mutations Predisposing to Breast Cancer in Early-Onset Breast Cancer Patients from Poland. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082321. [PMID: 32824581 PMCID: PMC7465341 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There are twenty recurrent mutations in six breast-cancer-predisposing genes in Poland (BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN, and RECQL). The frequencies of the twenty alleles have not been measured in a large series of early-onset breast cancer patients from Poland unselected for family history. We genotyped 2464 women with breast cancer diagnosed below age 41 years for twenty recurrent germline mutations in six genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2 CHEK2, PALB2, NBN, and RECQL. A mutation in one of the six genes was identified in 419 of the 2464 early-onset breast cancer cases (17%), including 22.4% of those cases diagnosed below age 31. The mutation frequency was 18.8% for familial breast cancer cases and 6% for non-familial cases. Among women with breast cancer below age 31, the mutation frequency was 23.6% for familial cases and 17.4% in non-familial cases. The majority of mutations (76.2%) were seen in BRCA1 and BRCA2. In Poland, a panel of twenty recurrent mutations in six genes can identify a genetic basis for a high percentage of early-onset cases and testing is recommended for all women with breast cancer at age 40 or below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Rogoża-Janiszewska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Karolina Malińska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Marcin Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Bohdan Górski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Wojciech Kluźniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Helena Rudnicka
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Mohammad R. Akbari
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada; (M.R.A.); (S.A.N.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Aniruddh Kashyap
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada; (M.R.A.); (S.A.N.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (K.M.); (C.C.); (A.J.); (J.G.); (T.H.); (M.L.); (B.G.); (W.K.); (H.R.); (A.K.); (J.L.); (T.D.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Lim DW, Narod SA. Outcomes of breast reconstruction following prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. Breast J 2020; 26:1637-1638. [PMID: 32783312 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Kotsopoulos J, Karlan B, Gronwald J, Hall E, Moller P, Tung N, Zakalik D, Foulkes WD, Rosen B, Neuhausen SL, Sun P, Lubinksi J, Narod SA. Long-term outcomes following a diagnosis of ovarian cancer at the time of preventive oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:825-830. [PMID: 32354794 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the most effective means of reducing the risk of ovarian cancer among women with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Some women are diagnosed with an invasive cancer (ovarian or fallopian tube) at the time of preventive surgery, referred to as an 'occult' cancer. The survival experience of these women is not known. METHODS We estimated the 10-year survival for 52 BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with an occult ovarian or fallopian tube cancer at the time of preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. RESULTS The mean age at diagnosis was 51.6 (range 33-69) years. All were serous cancers (although 14 were missing information on histologic subtype). Of the 20 cases with information available on stage at diagnosis, 10 were stage I, 1 was stage II, and 9 were stage III (n=32 missing). After a mean of 6.8 years, 12 women died (23%). The 10-year all-cause survival was 74%. CONCLUSION Although based on only 52 cases, these findings suggest a more favorable prognosis for BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with an occult rather than incident disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Elizabeth Hall
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pal Moller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Troy, Michigan, USA
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barry Rosen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinksi
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Harris HR, Cushing-Haugen KL, Webb PM, Nagle CM, Jordan SJ, Risch HA, Rossing MA, Doherty JA, Goodman MT, Modugno F, Ness RB, Moysich KB, Kjær SK, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Cramer DW, Bandera EV, Rodriguez L, Wentzensen N, Kotsopoulos J, Narod SA, McLaughlin JR, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Pearce CL, Wu AH, Lindström S, Terry KL. Association between genetically predicted polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol 2020; 48:822-830. [PMID: 31211375 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrine disorder with an estimated prevalence of 4-21% in reproductive aged women. Recently, the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) reported a decreased risk of invasive ovarian cancer among women with self-reported PCOS. However, given the limitations of self-reported PCOS, the validity of these observed associations remains uncertain. Therefore, we sought to use Mendelian randomization with genetic markers as a proxy for PCOS, to examine the association between PCOS and ovarian cancer. METHODS Utilizing 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with PCOS we assessed the association between genetically predicted PCOS and ovarian cancer risk, overall and by histotype, using summary statistics from a previously conducted genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer among European ancestry women within the OCAC (22 406 with invasive disease, 3103 with borderline disease and 40 941 controls). RESULTS An inverse association was observed between genetically predicted PCOS and invasive ovarian cancer risk: odds ratio (OR)=0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.85-0.99; P = 0.03]. When results were examined by histotype, the strongest inverse association was observed between genetically predicted PCOS and endometrioid tumors (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.92; P = 0.003). Adjustment for individual-level body mass index, oral contraceptive use and parity did not materially change the associations. CONCLUSION Our study provides evidence for a relationship between PCOS and reduced ovarian cancer risk, overall and among specific histotypes of invasive ovarian cancer. These results lend support to our previous observational study results. Future studies are needed to understand mechanisms underlying this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kara L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christina M Nagle
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan J Jordan
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Caner Prevention and Genetics Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Community and Population Health Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Susanne K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lorna Rodriguez
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Epidemiology Division, Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Epidemiology Division, Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Public Health Ontario, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Lindström
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Kotsopoulos J, Narod SA. Prophylactic salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer: Who should we target? Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1245-1251. [PMID: 32037528 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecologic malignancy (50% 5-year survival) due to a typically advanced stage at diagnosis and a high rate of recurrence. Chemoprevention options are limited, and few interventions have been shown to reduce cancer risk or mortality. Emerging data support the model that fallopian tubes are the site of origin for a proportion of high-grade serous cancers. This implies that a subset of cancers may be prevented by removing the fallopian tubes while leaving the ovaries intact. Accordingly, there has been shift in clinical practice for average risk women; some now recommend removal of both the fallopian tubes only instead of tubal ligation for sterilization or at the time of benign gynecologic surgery. This has been termed opportunistic salpingectomy and represents a means of decreasing the burden of ovarian cancer by preventing cancers that arise in the fallopian tubes. There have been no detailed, prospective reports that have estimated ovarian cancer risk reduction with opportunistic salpingectomy, neither among women at baseline population risk nor among women at a high risk of developing the disease. The situation is complicated for women with a BRCA mutation-bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a proven means of risk reduction and salpingectomy alone is not the standard of care. Based on the existing data, salpingectomy alone should only be reserved for women with a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of less than 5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Giannakeas V, Narod SA. Abstract P5-07-07: A generalizable relationship between mortality and time-to-death among breast cancer patients can be explained by tumor dormancy. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-07-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Women with ER-positive breast cancer may recur as late as twenty years post diagnosis. The reason for this delayed recurrence is unknown. We studied survival patterns, including time-to-death in 123,705 women with stage I to III invasive breast cancer, enrolled in the SEER database. We sought to determine if time from diagnosis to death could be explained by variation in tumor dormancy.
Methods: We divided the cohort into ten classes based on their 20-year risks of death from breast cancer. Probability of death at 20 years was estimated for each patient using year of diagnosis, patient characteristics (age, race, household income), tumor characteristics (grade, tumor size, nodal status, stage, ER and PR-status) and treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy). The 20-year mortality for women in the highest risk decile (decile 10) was 69% versus 5% for women in the lowest decile (decile 1). We define a variable α which represents the annual rate of reactivation from tumor dormancy. Using the highest risk decile as a reference distribution, we determined what α value gives the best fit for the time-to-death distribution of each decile. As a complementary analysis we performed quantile regression to determine independent predictors of time-to-death among women who died from breast cancer.
Results: The duration of tumor dormancy was much longer, on average, for ER-positive breast cancers than for ER-negative breast cancers. Time at peak mortality rate monotonically decreased by decile, ranging from 19 years post-diagnosis in the lowest risk decile to two years post-diagnosis in the highest risk decile (Table 1). The difference in the time-to-death distributions by decile could be explained by the variable α which represents the annual rate of reactivation from tumor dormancy.
In the regression analysis, ER-positive breast cancers had a median time-to-death 3.67 years longer than ER-negative breast cancers (Table 2). However, this effect was attenuated by risk factors correlated with ER status (adjusted difference 1.76 years). Notable independent predictors of time-to-death include ethnicity, tumor size, grade, nodal status and PR-status.
Conclusion: Reactivation from tumor dormancy appears to occur at random wherein the rate of tumor activation is correlated with probability of death from breast cancer. This model may explain the very long time to cancer recurrence in women with ER-positive node-negative breast cancers. The clinical course of women with low-risk breast cancer is inherently unpredictable.
Table 1: Factors related to breast cancer mortality and time-to-death by decile.Risk DecileNumber of patients (N)Annual death rate (per 100 person-years)20-year actuarial mortality (%)Peak mortality time (years)Median time-to-death (years)10th percentile time-to-death (years)90th percentile time-to-death (years)Optimal α (reactivations per person-year)112,3700.255.3%19.012.24.018.70.10212,3710.438.6%19.511.04.318.40.16312,3700.6011.3%9.510.33.517.60.20412,3710.7413.2%5.58.93.016.70.32512,3700.9016.0%3.58.62.617.40.32612,3711.1720.0%4.08.12.616.90.35712,3711.5124.8%3.07.62.316.70.41812,3702.1231.7%3.06.41.915.90.74912,3713.2242.5%2.55.61.714.81.291012,3706.6463.0%2.03.81.112.3InF (Ref.)
Table 2: Predictors of time-to-death in breast cancer patients.PredictorValueUnadjustedAdjustedMedian time-to-death (years)Difference* (years)Difference (years)**POverall/ Reference5.6713.05***<.0001Year of diagnosis19905.42Reference19915.670.250.170.360919925.670.250.220.289919935.580.170.350.059919946.000.580.530.0054Age at diagnosis<505.58Reference50-595.920.330.070.580760-696.170.58-0.060.655170-805.25-0.33-1.18<.0001EthnicityWhite5.75ReferenceBlack4.33-1.42-0.320.009East Asian6.670.920.930.0058Southeast Asian6.080.330.090.8208Other/Unknown6.170.420.420.4176Tumor size (cm)<1cm8.33Reference1-2cm7.33-1.00-0.650.07922-3cm5.58-2.75-1.42<.00013-5cm4.75-3.58-1.76<.00015+cm3.83-4.50-2.16<.0001Tumor gradeI11.17ReferenceII7.58-3.58-2.82<.0001III4.25-6.92-4.78<.0001IV3.92-7.25-5.18<.0001Unknown6.25-4.92-3.57<.0001Nodal statusN06.83ReferenceN15.67-1.17-0.69<.0001N25.00-1.83-1.08<.0001N33.83-3.00-2.03<.0001Unknown2.42-4.42-2.32<.0001ER statusPositive7.17ReferenceNegative3.50-3.67-1.76<.0001PR statusPositive7.25ReferenceNegative3.83-3.42-1.7<.0001Unknown5.08-2.17-1.35<.0001RadiotherapyNo5.42ReferenceYes6.080.670.260.0214Unknown5.08-0.33-0.470.1043ChemotherapyNo/Unknown6.58ReferenceYes5.17-1.42-0.310.0091*Difference in median time-to-death relative to reference value.**Independent difference in median time-to-death after adjusting for all covariates in table.***Median time-to-death of the reference group.
Citation Format: Vasily Giannakeas, Steven A Narod. A generalizable relationship between mortality and time-to-death among breast cancer patients can be explained by tumor dormancy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-07.
Collapse
|
85
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victoria Sopik
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Fachal L, Aschard H, Beesley J, Barnes DR, Allen J, Kar S, Pooley KA, Dennis J, Michailidou K, Turman C, Soucy P, Lemaçon A, Lush M, Tyrer JP, Ghoussaini M, Moradi Marjaneh M, Jiang X, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Alonso MR, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arason A, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Arun BK, Auber B, Auer PL, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barkardottir RB, Barrowdale D, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Białkowska K, Blanco AM, Blomqvist C, Blot W, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Bonanni B, Borg A, Bosse K, Brauch H, Brenner H, Briceno I, Brock IW, Brooks-Wilson A, Brüning T, Burwinkel B, Buys SS, Cai Q, Caldés T, Caligo MA, Camp NJ, Campbell I, Canzian F, Carroll JS, Carter BD, Castelao JE, Chiquette J, Christiansen H, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Clarke CL, Collée JM, Cornelissen S, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Cybulski C, Czene K, Daly MB, de la Hoya M, Devilee P, Diez O, Ding YC, Dite GS, Domchek SM, Dörk T, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Droit A, Dubois S, Dumont M, Duran M, Durcan L, Dwek M, Eccles DM, Engel C, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Fletcher O, Floris G, Flyger H, Foretova L, Foulkes WD, Friedman E, Fritschi L, Frost D, Gabrielson M, Gago-Dominguez M, Gambino G, Ganz PA, Gapstur SM, Garber J, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, Georgoulias V, Giles GG, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Goldberg MS, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Tibiletti MG, Greene MH, Grip M, Gronwald J, Grundy A, Guénel P, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hall P, Hamann U, Harrington PA, Hartikainen JM, Hartman M, He W, Healey CS, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Heyworth J, Hillemanns P, Hogervorst FBL, Hollestelle A, Hooning MJ, Hopper JL, Howell A, Huang G, Hulick PJ, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Iwasaki M, Jager A, Jakimovska M, Jakubowska A, James PA, Janavicius R, Jankowitz RC, John EM, Johnson N, Jones ME, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Jung A, Kaaks R, Kang D, Kapoor PM, Karlan BY, Keeman R, Kerin MJ, Khusnutdinova E, Kiiski JI, Kirk J, Kitahara CM, Ko YD, Konstantopoulou I, Kosma VM, Koutros S, Kubelka-Sabit K, Kwong A, Kyriacou K, Laitman Y, Lambrechts D, Lee E, Leslie G, Lester J, Lesueur F, Lindblom A, Lo WY, Long J, Lophatananon A, Loud JT, Lubiński J, MacInnis RJ, Maishman T, Makalic E, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Martinez ME, Matsuo K, Maurer T, Mavroudis D, Mayes R, McGuffog L, McLean C, Mebirouk N, Meindl A, Miller A, Miller N, Montagna M, Moreno F, Muir K, Mulligan AM, Muñoz-Garzon VM, Muranen TA, Narod SA, Nassir R, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Neven P, Nielsen FC, Nikitina-Zake L, Norman A, Offit K, Olah E, Olopade OI, Olsson H, Orr N, Osorio A, Pankratz VS, Papp J, Park SK, Park-Simon TW, Parsons MT, Paul J, Pedersen IS, Peissel B, Peshkin B, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Prajzendanc K, Prentice R, Presneau N, Prokofyeva D, Pujana MA, Pylkäs K, Radice P, Ramus SJ, Rantala J, Rau-Murthy R, Rennert G, Risch HA, Robson M, Romero A, Rossing M, Saloustros E, Sánchez-Herrero E, Sandler DP, Santamariña M, Saunders C, Sawyer EJ, Scheuner MT, Schmidt DF, Schmutzler RK, Schneeweiss A, Schoemaker MJ, Schöttker B, Schürmann P, Scott C, Scott RJ, Senter L, Seynaeve CM, Shah M, Sharma P, Shen CY, Shu XO, Singer CF, Slavin TP, Smichkoska S, Southey MC, Spinelli JJ, Spurdle AB, Stone J, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sutter C, Swerdlow AJ, Tamimi RM, Tan YY, Tapper WJ, Taylor JA, Teixeira MR, Tengström M, Teo SH, Terry MB, Teulé A, Thomassen M, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Toland AE, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Torres D, Torres-Mejía G, Troester MA, Truong T, Tung N, Tzardi M, Ulmer HU, Vachon CM, van Asperen CJ, van der Kolk LE, van Rensburg EJ, Vega A, Viel A, Vijai J, Vogel MJ, Wang Q, Wappenschmidt B, Weinberg CR, Weitzel JN, Wendt C, Wildiers H, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Wu AH, Yannoukakos D, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Hunter D, Pharoah PDP, Chang-Claude J, García-Closas M, Schmidt MK, Milne RL, Kristensen VN, French JD, Edwards SL, Antoniou AC, Chenevix-Trench G, Simard J, Easton DF, Kraft P, Dunning AM. Fine-mapping of 150 breast cancer risk regions identifies 191 likely target genes. Nat Genet 2020; 52:56-73. [PMID: 31911677 PMCID: PMC6974400 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0537-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified breast cancer risk variants in over 150 genomic regions, but the mechanisms underlying risk remain largely unknown. These regions were explored by combining association analysis with in silico genomic feature annotations. We defined 205 independent risk-associated signals with the set of credible causal variants in each one. In parallel, we used a Bayesian approach (PAINTOR) that combines genetic association, linkage disequilibrium and enriched genomic features to determine variants with high posterior probabilities of being causal. Potentially causal variants were significantly over-represented in active gene regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites. We applied our INQUSIT pipeline for prioritizing genes as targets of those potentially causal variants, using gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci), chromatin interaction and functional annotations. Known cancer drivers, transcription factors and genes in the developmental, apoptosis, immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways were over-represented among the highest-confidence target genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fachal
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hugues Aschard
- Centre de Bioinformatique Biostatistique et Biologie Intégrative (C3BI), Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siddhartha Kar
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Karen A Pooley
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular Pathology and The Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Constance Turman
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Penny Soucy
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Audrey Lemaçon
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maya Ghoussaini
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xia Jiang
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simona Agata
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Rosario Alonso
- Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, Human Cancer Genetic Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research (C070), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristan J Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernd Auber
- Institute of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Paul L Auer
- Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Judith Balmaña
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention Group, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Amie M Blanco
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - William Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ake Borg
- Department of Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristin Bosse
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- iFIT Cluster of Excellence, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research (C070), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ignacio Briceno
- Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
- Medical Faculty, Universidad de La Sabana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Ian W Brock
- Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA), Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Angela Brooks-Wilson
- Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas Brüning
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Molecular Epidemiology Group (C080), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Trinidad Caldés
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria A Caligo
- SOD Genetica Molecolare, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola J Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ian Campbell
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brian D Carter
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Vigo, Spain
| | - Jocelyne Chiquette
- Axe Oncologie, Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christine L Clarke
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sten Cornelissen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Angela Cox
- Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA), Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon S Cross
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Arnaud Droit
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Département de Médecine Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine, Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Stéphane Dubois
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Martine Dumont
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Mercedes Duran
- Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (IBGM), Universidad de Valladolid Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (UVA-CSIC), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Lorraine Durcan
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Miriam Dwek
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Suzanne Levy-Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Lin Fritschi
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, Galician Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Patricia A Ganz
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan M Gapstur
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - José A García-Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Mark S Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mervi Grip
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anne Grundy
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Cancer and Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patricia A Harrington
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jaana M Hartikainen
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei He
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catherine S Healey
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jane Heyworth
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Guanmengqian Huang
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Milena Jakimovska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
- State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rachel C Jankowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nichola Johnson
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daehee Kang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Pooja Middha Kapoor
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Surgery, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elza Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia
| | - Johanna I Kiiski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Weatmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Veli-Matti Kosma
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katerina Kubelka-Sabit
- Department of Histopathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital 'Acibadem Sistina', Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Cancer Genetics Centre, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Kyriacos Kyriacou
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular Pathology and The Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Yael Laitman
- The Suzanne Levy-Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eunjung Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wing-Yee Lo
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jennifer T Loud
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom Maishman
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tabea Maurer
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Rebecca Mayes
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catriona McLean
- Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
- Department of Tumour Biology, INSERM U830, Paris, France
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Austin Miller
- NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Nicola Miller
- Surgery, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Fernando Moreno
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Taru A Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rami Nassir
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Holy Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Patrick Neven
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Finn C Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Aaron Norman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nick Orr
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ana Osorio
- Centro de Investigación en Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - V Shane Pankratz
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Janos Papp
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sue K Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - James Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Beth Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM-the FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Julian Peto
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Karolina Prajzendanc
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Ross Prentice
- Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nadege Presneau
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Darya Prokofyeva
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia
| | - Miquel Angel Pujana
- ProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Rohini Rau-Murthy
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gad Rennert
- Clalit National Israeli Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mark Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Marta Santamariña
- Centro de Investigación en Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Christobel Saunders
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- Research Oncology, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maren T Scheuner
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ben Schöttker
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research (C070), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schürmann
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christopher Scott
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rodney J Scott
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Pathology North, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Medical Genetics, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leigha Senter
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, USA
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Snezhana Smichkoska
- University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John J Spinelli
- Population Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Tumour Biology, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Tengström
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IDIBGI-IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence, Denmark
| | - Darcy L Thull
- Department of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Diana Torres
- Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriela Torres-Mejía
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Cancer and Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Tzardi
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional Onco-genomics and Genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Joseph Vijai
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maartje J Vogel
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, USA
| | | | - Camilla Wendt
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Yan Zhang
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research (C070), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON) Coordinating Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juliet D French
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stacey L Edwards
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Narod SA, Huzarski T, Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Cybulski C, Oszurek O, Dębniak T, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Lener M, Białkowska K, Sukiennicki G, Muszyńska M, Marciniak W, Sun P, Kotsopoulos J, Lubiński J. Serum selenium level and cancer risk: a nested case-control study. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2019; 17:33. [PMID: 31890061 PMCID: PMC6929308 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-019-0131-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated a relationship between selenium status and cancer risk among those with low selenium levels. It is of interest to prospectively evaluate the relationship between selenium and cancer among women who reside in a region with ubiquitously low selenium levels. Methods We performed a nested case-control study of baseline serum selenium levels and cancer risk using data and biological samples from 19,573 females that were participants in a biobanking initiative between 2010 and 2014 in Szczecin Poland. Cases included women with any incident cancer (n = 97) and controls (n = 184) were women with no cancer at baseline or follow-up. Serum selenium was quantified using mass spectroscopy. Results The odds ratio associated being below the cutoff of 70.0 μg/L compared to a level above 70.0 μg/L was 2.29 (95% CI 1.26–4.19; P = 0.007). The risks for women in the two middle categories were similar and suggests that the normal range be between 70 μg/L and 90 μg/L. There was evidence for an increased risk of cancer among women in the highest category of selenium levels (i.e., > 90 μg/L), but this association did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 1.63; 95%CI 0.63–4.19; P = 0.31). Conclusions Results from this study suggest that suggest that the optimum serum level of selenium in women living in Poland should be between 70 μg/L and 90 μg/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- 1Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,2Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland.,5Independent laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Lener
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Sukiennicki
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | | | - Ping Sun
- 1Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- 1Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,2Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- 3Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Abstract
Of the several kinds of bias that might corrupt an epidemiology study, selection bias is the most insidious […]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Lerner-Ellis J, Sopik V, Wong A, Lázaro C, Narod SA, Charames GS. Retesting of women who are negative for a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation using a 20-gene panel. J Med Genet 2019; 57:380-384. [PMID: 31784482 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of retesting women who previously tested negative for a pathogenic variant (mutation) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using an expanded panel of breast and ovarian cancer genes is unclear. METHODS We studied 110 BRCA1/2-negative women who were retested using a panel of 20 breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes at the Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (AMDL) at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto between March 2017 and March 2019. All patients had previously tested negative for BRCA pathogenic variants at the AMDL between January 2012 and March 2018 and were subsequently referred for retesting by their physician. RESULTS Overall, six pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 were found (prevalence 5.5%). There were two pathogenic variants found in RAD51C, and one found in each of BRIP1, PALB2, PMS2 and PTEN. The prevalence of pathogenic variants was 6.5% for women affected with cancer (6 of 93), including 4.9% for women with breast cancer (4 of 82) and 22.2% for women with ovarian cancer (2 of 9). None of the 17 unaffected women had a clinically significant or pathogenic variant. There were 44 women (40%) for whom the result of the panel test was inconclusive due to the detection of a variant of uncertain significance. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that the retesting of BRCA1/2-negative individuals with an expanded panel of 20 breast and ovarian cancer genes can produce clinically relevant results, with a yield of 5.5% for pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victoria Sopik
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Wong
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George S Charames
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Gronwald J, Lubinski J, Huzarski T, Cybulski C, Menkiszak J, Siołek M, Stawicka M, Sun P, Kim SJ, Kotsopoulos J, Narod SA. A comparison of ovarian cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 mutations undergoing annual ultrasound screening or preventive oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:270-274. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
92
|
Glentis S, Dimopoulos AC, Rouskas K, Ntritsos G, Evangelou E, Narod SA, Mes-Masson AM, Foulkes WD, Rivera B, Tonin PN, Ragoussis J, Dimas AS. Exome Sequencing in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Negative Greek Families Identifies MDM1 and NBEAL1 as Candidate Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer. Front Genet 2019; 10:1005. [PMID: 31681433 PMCID: PMC6813924 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10% of breast cancer (BC) cases are hereditary BC (HBC), with HBC most commonly encountered in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Although thousands of loss-of-function (LoF) alleles in over 20 genes have been associated with HBC susceptibility, the genetic etiology of approximately 50% of cases remains unexplained, even when polygenic risk models are considered. We focused on one of the least-studied European populations and applied whole-exome sequencing (WES) to 52 individuals from 17 Greek HBOC families, in which at least one patient was negative for known HBC risk variants. Initial screening revealed pathogenic variants in known cancer genes, including BARD1:p.Trp91* detected in a cancer-free individual, and MEN1:p.Glu260Lys detected in a BC patient. Gene- and variant-based approaches were applied to exome data to identify candidate risk variants outside of known risk genes. Findings were verified in a collection of Canadian HBOC patients of European ancestry (FBRCAX), in an independent group of Canadian BC patients (CHUM-BC) and controls (CARTaGENE), as well as in individuals from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the UK Biobank (UKB). Rare LoF variants were uncovered in MDM1 and NBEAL1 in Greek and Canadian HBOC patients. We also report prioritized missense variants SETBP1:c.4129G > C and C7orf34:c.248C > T. These variants comprise promising candidates whose role in cancer pathogenicity needs to be explored further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Glentis
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Al. Fleming, Vari, Greece
| | - Alexandros C Dimopoulos
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Al. Fleming, Vari, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Rouskas
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Al. Fleming, Vari, Greece
| | - George Ntritsos
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Evangelos Evangelou
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A Narod
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Barbara Rivera
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Antigone S Dimas
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Al. Fleming, Vari, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan BY, Huzarski T, Tung N, Moller P, Armel S, Lynch HT, Senter L, Eisen A, Singer CF, Foulkes WD, Jacobson MR, Sun P, Lubinski J, Narod SA. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Among BRCA1 Mutation Carriers. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:1059-1065. [PMID: 29710224 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended for BRCA1 mutation carriers to prevent ovarian cancer. Whether or not hormone replacement therapy (HRT) initiated after oophorectomy is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer has not been evaluated in a prospective study. Objective To determine the association between HRT use and BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, longitudinal cohort study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from 80 participating centers in 17 countries was conducted between 1995 and 2017 with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. Participants had sought genetic testing for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation because of a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Carriers of BRCA1 mutation with no personal medical history of cancer who underwent bilateral oophorectomy following enrollment were eligible for the cohort study. Exposures A follow-up questionnaire was administered every 2 years to obtain detailed information on HRT use. A left-truncated Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs associated with the initiation of HRT use postoophorectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Incident breast cancer. Results A total of 872 BRCA1 mutation carriers with a mean postoophorectomy follow-up period of 7.6 years (range, 0.4-22.1) were included in this study. Mean (SD) age of participants was 43.4 (8.5) years. Among these, 92 (10.6%) incident breast cancers were diagnosed. Overall, HRT use after oophorectomy was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The HR was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.62-1.52; P = .89) for ever use of any type of HRT vs no use; however, the effects of estrogen alone and combination hormonal therapy were different. After 10 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer among women who used estrogen-alone HRT was 12% compared with 22% among women who used estrogen plus progesterone HRT (absolute difference, 10%; log rank P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that use of estrogen after oophorectomy does not increase the risk of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 mutation and should reassure BRCA1 mutation carriers considering preventive surgery that HRT is safe. The possible adverse effect of progesterone-containing HRT warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pal Moller
- Inherited Cancer Research Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, the Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michelle R Jacobson
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Prajzendanc K, Domagała P, Hybiak J, Ryś J, Huzarski T, Szwiec M, Tomiczek-Szwiec J, Redelbach W, Sejda A, Gronwald J, Kluz T, Wiśniowski R, Cybulski C, Łukomska A, Białkowska K, Sukiennicki G, Kulczycka K, Narod SA, Wojdacz TK, Lubiński J, Jakubowska A. BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood is associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:1293-1298. [PMID: 31469414 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Methylation of the promoter of the BRCA1 gene in DNA derived from peripheral blood cells is a possible risk factor for breast cancer. It is not clear if this association is restricted to certain types of breast cancer or is a general phenomenon. We evaluated BRCA1 methylation status in peripheral blood cells from 942 breast cancer patients and from 500 controls. We also assessed methylation status in 262 paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues. Methylation status was assessed using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting and was categorized as positive or negative. BRCA1 methylation in peripheral blood cells was strongly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (odds ratio [OR] 4.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.13-7.07; p < 0.001), but not of estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.46-1.42; p = 0.46). Methylation was also overrepresented among patients with high-grade cancers (OR 4.53; 95% CI: 2.91-7.05; p < 0.001) and medullary cancers (OR 3.08; 95% CI: 1.38-6.88; p = 0.006). Moreover, we detected a significant concordance of BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood and paired tumor tissue (p < 0.001). We found that BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood cells is associated with approximately five times greater risk of TNBC. We propose that BRCA1 methylation in blood-derived DNA could be a novel biomarker of increased breast cancer susceptibility, in particular for triple-negative tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Prajzendanc
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paweł Domagała
- Department of Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jolanta Hybiak
- Department of Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Janusz Ryś
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Centre and Institute of Oncology, Cracow, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Marek Szwiec
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.,Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospital in Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Joanna Tomiczek-Szwiec
- Department of Histology, Institute of Medicine, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.,Regional Oncology Centre, Opole, Poland
| | - Wojciech Redelbach
- Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medicine, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Sejda
- Department of Pathology, Provincial Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland.,Patomorphology Department, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Institute of Obstetric and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland
| | - Rafał Wiśniowski
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Regional Oncology Centre, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Alicja Łukomska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Sukiennicki
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Kulczycka
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tomasz K Wojdacz
- Independent Clinical Epigenetics Laboratory, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Narod SA. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc). Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:e465. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
96
|
Kluźniak W, Wokołorczyk D, Rusak B, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Stempa K, Rudnicka H, Kashyap A, Dębniak T, Jakubowska A, Lener M, Szwiec M, Tomiczek-Szwiec J, Jarkiewicz-Tretyn J, Cechowska M, Domagała P, Szymiczek A, Bagherzadeh M, Lubiński J, Narod SA, Akbari MR, Cybulski C. Inherited variants in XRCC2 and the risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 178:657-663. [PMID: 31463769 PMCID: PMC6817746 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05415-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background XRCC2 participates in homologous recombination and in DNA repair. XRCC2 has been reported to be a breast cancer susceptibility gene and is now included in several breast cancer susceptibility gene panels. Methods We sequenced XRCC2 in 617 Polish women with familial breast cancer and found a founder mutation. We then genotyped 12,617 women with breast cancer and 4599 controls for the XRCC2 founder mutation. Results We identified a recurrent truncating mutation of XRCC2 (c.96delT, p.Phe32fs) in 3 of 617 patients with familial breast cancer who were sequenced. The c.96delT mutation was then detected in 29 of 12,617 unselected breast cancer cases (0.23%) compared to 11 of 4599 cancer-free women (0.24%) (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.48–1.93). The mutation frequency in 1988 women with familial breast cancer was 0.2% (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.27–2.65). Breast cancers in XRCC2 mutation carriers and non-carriers were similar with respect to age of diagnosis and clinical characteristics. Loss of the wild-type XRCC2 allele was observed only in one of the eight breast cancers from patients who carried the XRCC2 mutation. No cancer type was more common in first- or second-degree relatives of XRCC2 mutation carriers than in relatives of the non-carriers. Conclusion XRCC2 c.96delT is a protein-truncating founder variant in Poland. There is no evidence that this mutation predisposes to breast cancer (and other cancers). It is premature to consider XRCC2 as a breast cancer-predisposing gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Kluźniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokołorczyk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Bogna Rusak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Klaudia Stempa
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Helena Rudnicka
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Aniruddh Kashyap
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.,Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marek Szwiec
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.,Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Joanna Tomiczek-Szwiec
- Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.,Department of Oncological Gynecology, Oncology Center in Opole, Opole, Poland
| | | | - Magdalena Cechowska
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Genetic Outpatients Clinic in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Paweł Domagała
- Department of Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Agata Szymiczek
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maryam Bagherzadeh
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mohammad R Akbari
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
97
|
Marciniak W, Derkacz R, Muszyńska M, Baszuk P, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Cybulski C, Jakubowska A, Falco M, Dębniak T, Lener M, Oszurek O, Pullella K, Kotsopoulos J, Sun P, Narod SA, Lubiński J. Blood arsenic levels and the risk of familial breast cancer in Poland. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:2721-2727. [PMID: 31348523 PMCID: PMC7154768 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Arsenic is recognized as a potent carcinogen at high concentrations, but the relationship between environmental arsenic and breast cancer risk has not well been studied. Most research has focused on the effect of arsenic in populations with high endemic exposure, and not in populations with arsenic levels within normal limits. We sought to determine if blood arsenic levels predict the risk of breast and other cancers risk among women in northern Poland. The cohort consisted of 1,702 healthy women, aged 40 and above, identified between 2010 and 2017. Blood arsenic level was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. After an average of 4.5 years of follow‐up (range 0.7–7.3 years), there were 110 incident cases of cancer diagnosed in the cohort, including 68 cases of breast cancer. Women in the highest quartile of arsenic had a highly significant 13‐fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, compared to women in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio [HR] = 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.02–43.0). Results were similar for arsenic and all incident cancers (HR quartile 4 vs. quartile 1 = 13.3; 95% CI 4.78–37.0). If confirmed, our study suggests that the blood arsenic level may be a useful predictive marker of cancer risk in women. What's new? Arsenic has long been recognized as a potent carcinogen at high concentrations. But can it affect cancer risk at “normal,” environmental concentrations? In this Polish study, the authors found that women whose blood levels of arsenic were in the highest quartile had a 13‐fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, compared to women in the lowest quartile. If confirmed in further studies, these results suggests that blood arsenic level may be a useful predictive marker of cancer risk in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Marciniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Róża Derkacz
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Magdalena Muszyńska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Piotr Baszuk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Michał Falco
- Radiation Oncology Department, West Pomeranian Oncology Center, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| | - Marcin Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Read-Gene SA, Grzepnica, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Narod SA. Genetic testing for breast cancer in the Hispanic community. Cancer 2019; 125:2728-2729. [PMID: 31206622 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Rusak B, Kluźniak W, Wokołorczyk D, Stempa K, Kashyap A, Rudnicka H, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Dębniak T, Jakubowska A, Szwiec M, Akbari MR, Narod SA, Lubiński J, Cybulski C. Allelic modification of breast cancer risk in women with an NBN mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 178:427-431. [PMID: 31410679 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05391-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NBN 657del5 founder mutation predisposes to breast and prostate cancer. Recently, it has been reported that the pathogenicity of this mutation with regard to prostate cancer risk is modified by a missense variant of the same gene (E185Q). METHODS To evaluate the interaction of the 657del5 and E185Q founder alleles of NBN on breast cancer risk in Poland, 4964 women with breast cancer and 6152 controls were genotyped for these two recurrent variants of NBN (657del5 truncating variant and E185Q missense variant). RESULTS The NBN 657del5 mutation was detected in 57 of 4964 unselected cases and in 35 of 6152 controls (OR = 2.0, p = 0.001). The E185Q GG genotype was detected in 2167 of 4964 unselected cases and in 2617 of 6152 controls (OR = 1.04, p = 0.3). In carriers of the 657del5 deletion, the elevated cancer risk was restricted to women with the GG genotype of the E185Q variant (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.6; p < 0.0001). Among women with other E185Q genotypes, the OR associated with 657del5 was 1.0 (95% CI 0.5-1.8; p = 0.9). The interaction between the two alleles was statistically significant (homogeneity p = 0.003). CONCLUSION In Poland, the pathogenicity of the NBN 657del5 mutation is restricted to women with a homozygous GG genotype of missense variant of the same gene (E185Q). This is the first clear example whereby a moderate penetrance breast cancer gene is impacted by a genetic modifier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogna Rusak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Wojciech Kluźniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokołorczyk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Klaudia Stempa
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Aniruddh Kashyap
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Helena Rudnicka
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marek Szwiec
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Mohammad R Akbari
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Kotsopoulos J, Hall E, Finch A, Hu H, Murphy J, Rosen B, Narod SA, Cheung AM. Changes in Bone Mineral Density After Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Carriers of a BRCA Mutation. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e198420. [PMID: 31390031 PMCID: PMC6686775 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Preventive surgery is strongly recommended for individuals with a BRCA mutation at a young age to prevent ovarian cancer and improve overall survival. The overall effect of early surgical menopause on various health outcomes, including bone health, has not been clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with bone mineral density (BMD) loss among individuals with a BRCA mutation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study of participants with a BRCA mutation who underwent oophorectomy through the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, recruited participants from January 2000 to May 2013. Eligibility criteria included having a BRCA mutation, at least 1 ovary intact prior to surgery, and no history of any cancer other than breast cancer. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before and after surgery. Data analysis began in December 2018 and finished in January 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The annual change in BMD from baseline to follow-up was calculated for the following 3 anatomical locations: (1) lumbar spine, (2) femoral neck, and (3) total hip. RESULTS A total of 95 women had both a baseline and postsurgery BMD measurement with a mean (SD) follow-up period of 22.0 (12.7) months. The mean (SD) age at oophorectomy was 48.0 (7.4) years. Among women who were premenopausal at time of surgery (50 [53%]), there was a decrease in BMD from baseline to follow-up across the lumbar spine (annual change, -3.45%; 95% CI, -4.61% to -2.29%), femoral neck (annual change, -2.85%; 95% CI, -3.79% to -1.91%), and total hip (annual change, -2.24%; 95% CI, -3.11% to -1.38%). Self-reported hormone therapy use was associated with significantly less bone loss at the lumbar spine (-2.00% vs -4.69%; P = .02) and total hip (-1.38% vs -3.21; P = .04) compared with no hormone therapy use. Among postmenopausal women at time of surgery (45 [47%]), there was also a significant decrease in BMD across the lumbar spine (annual change, -0.82%; 95% CI, -1.42% to -0.23%) and femoral neck (annual change, -0.68%; 95% CI, -1.33% to -0.04%) but not total hip (annual change, -0.18%; 95% CI, -0.82% to 0.46%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that oophorectomy was associated with postoperative bone loss, especially among women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery. Targeted management strategies should include routine BMD assessment and hormone therapy use to improve management of bone health in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Hall
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Finch
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanxian Hu
- Osteoporosis Program, University Health Network, Centre of Excellence in Skeletal Health Assessment, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joan Murphy
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barry Rosen
- Osteoporosis Program, University Health Network, Centre of Excellence in Skeletal Health Assessment, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela M. Cheung
- Osteoporosis Program, University Health Network, Centre of Excellence in Skeletal Health Assessment, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|