Basket versus balloon extraction for choledocholithiasis: a single center prospective single-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is essential when dealing in patients with choledocholithiasis. However, the proper extraction device selection is, often, a matter of the endoscopists' preference. We conducted a single center prospective randomized controlled study to access success rates for basket versus balloon catheters for small stones.

PATIENT AND METHODS

in our non-inferiority study, 180 patients with bile duct stones were randomized in a basket and a balloon catheter group. Inclusion criteria were fluoroscopically bile duct stones ≤10mm in diameter and a common bile duct diameter ≤15mm. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete bile duct clearance for each method. Secondary endpoints included time completed and amount of radiation dose recorded in each ERCP session, as well as any reported adverse events.

RESULTS

balloon was non-inferior to basket stone extraction (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12-10.05, p=0.031). Complete clearance was achieved in 69 out of 82 patients (84.1%) in the basket catheter group versus 79 out of 84 patients (94%) in the balloon catheter group (p=0.047) ; this seems to be especially true for patients with few stones and of small size (≤2 stones, p=0.043 and stone diameter ≤5mm, p=0.032). Complete stone clearance in the basket group patients took longer than that in the balloon group (4.52 and 4.06 min, respectively, p=0.015). Higher median radiation doses for stone clearance were recorded in the basket versus the balloon catheter group (1534.43 Gy versus 1245.45 Gy, p=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

our study showed that balloon was non-inferior to basket stone extraction.

Endoscopic intervention in pancreatitis: perspectives from a gastroenterologist

The last decade has seen a dramatic paradigm shift for the treatment of pancreatitis and its related complications away from surgery to minimally invasive endoscopic approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the indications, techniques and outcomes of endoscopic interventions in the management of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Emphasis is placed on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

One-stage laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy, cholecystectomy and choledochotomy by a transperitoneal anterior approach Case report of a combined management for a challenging condition

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the treatment of choice for management of adrenal tumors. Several approaches are proposed, including the transperitoneal one with patient in lateral or supine position, and the retroperitoneal one, with patient in lateral or prone position. The best approach, however, has yet to be defined. In patients with gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones, available options are one-stage [including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with CBD exploration (LC-LCBDE) and LC with endoscopic rendez-vous (LC-ERV)], or two-stage management [LC and pre or postoperative Endoscopic-Retrograde-Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES)]. Both are safe and effective, with lower hospital stay after one-stage option. The decision for one or the other depends on local resources and patient conditions. We report the case of a hypertensive 53-years-old man with Cushing's disease from pituitary ACTH-secreting adenoma, after three failed trans-sphenoidal pituitary gland surgical resection procedures, and recurrent biliary symptoms from gallstones and CBD stones. The patient underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal bilateral adrenalectomy in supine position (anterior approach on the right, submesocolic approach on the left) together with LC, intraoperative cholangiography, choledochotomy, CBD exploration, T-tube drainage. In this challenging case, laparoscopic transperitoneal bilateral adrenalectomy with patient in supine position together with one-stage laparoscopic management of gallstones and CBD stones, offered the patient the opportunity to solve both adrenal and biliary problems in the same session, reducing hospital stay and costs. In experienced hands, the transperitoneal combination of different surgical approaches during the same anesthesia with patient in supine position may provide safe and effective patient management. KEY WORDS: Bilateral adrenalectomy, Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), Choledochotomy, Common bile duct (CBD) stones, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), Submesocolic approach, Transperitoneal anterior approach.

ERCP in patients after choledochodenoanastomosis

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate our experience with diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients after choledochoduodenoanastomosis.

METHODS

The study took 20 years (November 1994 - December 2014). Three patients after choledochoduodenoanastomosis who had symptoms of biliary obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. In all cases, a standard therapeutic videolateroscope was used to perform ERCP.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

We achieved ERCP in these 3 patients with choledochoduodenoanastomosis 100% cannulation success rate - 3 out of 3 patients. This was 100% success rate of diagnostic ERCP. In all of these patients, ERCP was found - both stenosis of the natural mouth of the Vater papilla, stenosis of choledochoduodenoanastomosis, and suprastenotic distal choledocholithiasis. In all patients with the above-described ERCP pathology, endoscopic treatment was initiated immediately after diagnostic ERCP, consisting of standard endoscopic papillotomy of the stenotic Vater papilla, balloon dilatation of choledochoduodenoanastomosis stenosis, and endoscopic extraction of suprastenotic distal choledocholithiasis. In total, therapeutic ERCP was completely successful in all 3 patients out of 3 (100%) who had initially started endoscopic treatment. There were no complications in our group of 3 patients.

CONCLUSION

In ERCP in patients after choledochoduodenoanastomosis, we achieved 100% success of both diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in all of our 3 patients.

Optimal dilation time for combined small endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for common bile duct stones: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the established treatment for common bile duct stones. Balloon dilation offers an alternative. Prolonged dilation (300 s) with a 10 mm diameter balloon decreases the occurrence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to determine the optimal duration of dilation for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for the removal of common bile duct stones.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial at 15 tertiary surgical centres in China. Eligible patients (≥18 years) with native papilla and common bile duct stones (≤1·5 cm in size and <2 cm in diameter) undergoing ERCP were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive balloon dilation for 0, 30, 60, 180, or 300 s after deep bile duct cannulation. Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list with a block size of ten, stratified by centre. Patients and outcome assessors, but not endoscopists and investigators, were masked to treatment allocation. Balloon dilation was done with controlled radial expansion balloons according to common bile duct stone size. Stones were removed using stone retrieval balloons or baskets. The primary endpoint was overall frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The primary efficacy analysis and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients with successful cannulation, but excluded those who withdrew consent after randomisation. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02510495, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between July 29, 2015, and Dec 1, 2017, 3721 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones were recruited, 1718 of whom were excluded. The remaining 2003 patients underwent a small (3-5 mm) endoscopic sphincterotomy. 83 patients withdrew consent after the ERCP procedure, thus 1920 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (0 s [n=371], 30 s [n=384], 60 s [n=388], 180 s [n=390], and 300 s [n=387]). Overall, post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 199 (10%) of 1920 patients (44 [12%] patients in the 0 s group, 28 [7%] in the 30 s group, 32 [8%] in the 60 s group, 36 [9%] in the 180 s group, and 59 [15%] in the 300 s group). Prolonged dilation (300 s) significantly increased the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with shorter balloon dilation (p=0·002). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly lower in the 30, 60, and 180 s groups than in the 300 s group (relative risk [RR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·31-0·73; p=0·0005 vs the 30 s group; 0·54, 0·36-0·81; p=0·003 vs the 60 s group; 0·61, 0·41-0·89; p=0·01 vs the 180 s group). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly higher in the 0 s group than the 30 s group (RR 1·62, 1·04-2·56; p=0·03). No difference in stone extraction (all ≥90%) was observed between groups. Following ERCP, 90 (5%) of 1920 patients had acute cholangitis, 14 (<1%) had acute cholecystitis, and five (<1%) had gastrointestinal bleeding, with no significant differences between groups. One (<1%) patient had Stapfer II perforation, which resolved spontaneously with conservative treatment.

INTERPRETATION

A balloon dilation time of 30 s for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation reduced the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis and was determined to be the optimum dilation time for the removal of common bile duct stones.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Gansu Competitive Foundation Projects for Technology Development and Innovation.

ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis

Each year choledocholithiasis results in biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in a significant number of patients. The primary treatment, ERCP, is minimally invasive but associated with adverse events in 6% to 15%. This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standard of Practice (SOP) Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic evaluation and treatment of choledocholithiasis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to rigorously review and synthesize the contemporary literature regarding the following topics: EUS versus MRCP for diagnosis, the role of early ERCP in gallstone pancreatitis, endoscopic papillary dilation after sphincterotomy versus sphincterotomy alone for large bile duct stones, and impact of ERCP-guided intraductal therapy for large and difficult choledocholithiasis. Comprehensive systematic reviews were also performed to assess the following: same-admission cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis, clinical predictors of choledocholithiasis, optimal timing of ERCP vis-à-vis cholecystectomy, management of Mirizzi syndrome and hepatolithiasis, and biliary stent therapy for choledocholithiasis. Core clinical questions were derived using an iterative process by the ASGE SOP Committee. This body developed all recommendations founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of risks and harms, consideration of stakeholder preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.

Study on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a modern & universally established modality in the evaluation and treatment of suspected biliary and pancreatic disease. In Bangladesh, ERCP services are limited to few tertiary care centers mostly in the capital & large city. ERCP was 1st introduced in Mymensingh on 3rd April 2016 in a private hospital. Since then, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (MMCH) provides ERCP services to a large volume of patients in collaboration with private center for diagnostic accuracy & therapeutic purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience in ERCP, to characterize & evaluate the aetiology, findings of ERCP & frequency of complications. This prospective type of study was carried out by the department of hepatology, MMCH from 3rd April 2016 to 10th July 2018 in collaboration with that private center where ERCP has been established. All patients undergoing ERCP during this period were included. Aetiology & findings were assessed at the time of ERCP & complications were assessed during procedure, index hospitalization & within 30 days after the procedure by telephone contact. A total of 301 consecutive ERCP were performed during the study period. Among them, 182(60.5%) were male & 119(39.5%) were female with an age range of 18-78 years. The most common indications for ERCP were: cholangiocarcinoma in 98(32.56%) & choledocholithiasis in 95(31.56%) followed by periampullary growth in 93(30.89%), suspected CBD stricture in 12(4%) & chronic pancreatitis in 2(0.66%). The most common findings were choledocholithiasis (32.56%), cholangiocarcinoma (32.56%), biliary obstruction due to periampullary growth (30.56%). Biliary fistula with distal bile duct stricture was found in (1.66%), bile duct stricture in (1.33%), chronic pancreatitis in (0.66%), and organic papillary stenosis with deformed bulb were discovered in (0.34%) case. All ERCPs were done for therapeutic purpose. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was the most common therapeutic procedure (87.04%) of which biliary stenting was done in (67.44%) & stone extraction in (33.71%). Stone extraction from biliary tree was successfully done in 94 cases (98.67%) but it was unsuccessful from biliary tree in 4 cases (1.33%) & also from pancreatic duct in a separate case. The most frequent complication was Post-ERCP pancreatitis in 9 patients (2.99%) followed by acute confusional state (1.33%). Post-ERCP cholangitis occurred in (0.99%) & death was reported in 2 cases (0.66%) due to anaesthetic hazard.

[Lemmel's syndrome: report of a case]

Lemmel's syndrome is a very rare condition as a cause of obstructive jaundice secondary to the presence of a duodenal diverticulum. We report a case, a 68-year-old female patient with a cholestatic pattern, biliary tract dilatation, who underwent ERCP, with a juxtapapillary diverticulum compressing the distal bile duct, which was sphincterotomy.

Transthoracic cholecystectomy following biliary pancreatitis arising from a thoracic herniated gallbladder

Asymptomatic right diaphragmatic rupture with liver and gallbladder herniation and secondary Budd-Chiari syndrome is a rare complication of abdominal trauma. In this setting, the management of gallbladder stones remains poorly described and may require a thoracic approach.

Can Trainees Safely Perform Endoscopic Treatments for Common Bile Duct Stones? A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective There are no reports on whether or not trainees can safely carry out endoscopic procedures for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatments for CBD stones by trainees. Methods Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 1,016 consecutive patients at our institution during the 6-year study period. The endoscopically treated patients with CBD stones were included in this study. Physicians who had experienced ≥300 ERCP procedures were defined as experts, while those who had experienced <300 procedures were defined as trainees. The trainees were replaced by an expert when they could not achieve the established criteria. Patients were divided into the following three groups to retrospectively examine the patients' backgrounds, details of endoscopic treatments, and intra-/post-operative complications: Group A, completed by trainees under supervision of an expert; B, treated by an expert who switched in for a trainee in the middle of the procedure; and C, completed by an expert. Results A total of 325 patients with CBD stones underwent endoscopic treatments. The number included in Groups A, B, and C was 176, 102, and 47, respectively. The bile duct catheter insertion successes rates for Groups A, B, and C were 99.0%, 97.1%, and 100% (p=0.09), and the complete stone removal rates were 94.2%, 94.8%, and 100%, respectively (p=0.07), showing no significant difference among the three groups. Furthermore, the frequency of intra-/post-operative complications was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.48, p=0.12, respectively). Conclusion This study showed that trainees could safely perform endoscopic procedures in accordance with our facility's criteria during ERCP.

Does preserved sphincter of Oddi function prevent common bile duct stones recurrence in patients after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation?

BACKGROUND

Whether preserving sphincter of Oddi (SO) function by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is beneficial for preventing recurrent common bile duct stone disease (CBDS) is controversial. The aim of this study was to measure sphincter of Oddi (SO) function by using SO manometry, and to evaluate the association with recurrent CBDS.

METHODS

Patients with suspected CBDS who underwent successful EPBD were included. These patients underwent SO manometry at two months after EPBD with bile duct clearance. They were regularly followed for recurrent CBDS.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to December 2009, 185 patients received EPBD and SO manometry was included. There were 64% male with mean age of 65 ± 15.6 years. Mean ballooning inflation size was 1.1 ± 0.19 cm and mean ballooning time was 4.5 ± 0.85 min 55.7% had a sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (SOBP) of 0 mmHg, 16.2% < 10 mmHg, 26.5% 10-40 mmHg, and 1.6% > 40 mmHg. In multivariate analysis, EPBD with balloon ≥1.2 cm was the only factor for loss of SO function. Moreover, patients with preserved SO function had higher stone recurrence rate (15% vs. 5%, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

EPBD using balloon ≥1.2 cm is a major factor for loss of SO function, which seems to reduce the risk of recurrent CBD stones.

Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 10-15% of the cases, conventional methods for removing bile duct stones by ERCP/balloon-basket extraction fail. The purpose of this review is to describe endoscopic techniques in managing these "difficult bile duct stones."

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with balloon extraction ± mechanical lithotripsy is the initial approach used to retrieve large bile duct stones. With advent of digital cholangioscopy, electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy are gaining popularity. Enteroscopy-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approaches can be used for those with gastric bypass anatomy. Difficulties in removing bile duct stones can be related to stone-related factors such as the size and location of the stone or to altered anatomy such as stricture in the bile duct or Roux-en-Y anatomy. Several endoscopy approaches and techniques have described in the recent past that have greatly enhanced our ability to remove these "difficult" bile duct stones.

Endoscopy for treating minor post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula A review of the literature

AIM

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease is the most common surgical procedures performed in Western countries and bile leaks remain a significant cause of morbidity. A recognized treatment for minor biliary injury is internal biliary decompression by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic strategy in the management of minor biliary injuries.

MATERIAL OF STUDY

Twenty-two patients with a bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recorded consecutively between 2007 and 2017 and they were all treated with endoscopic approach, with ERCP in order to confirm the nature of the injury and decompress the bile duct with sphincterotomy, stent insertion, or the placement of nasobiliary drains. In 15 patients, the leak was diagnosed by persistent bile drainage, in the other 7 patients without a drain the biliary leak was suspected because of symptoms in the immediate postoperative period.

RESULTS

Controlled biliary fistulae were established in all 22 patients (100%), without further intervention. A complete cholangiogram was obtained in all patients (100%). The most common sites of minor leak were the cystic duct stump and the Luschka duct, but in one patients the site of the leak was unclear.

DISCUSSION

Early in the series, sphincterotomy alone or nasobiliary tube placement was performed. Subsequently patients underwent sphincterotomy with stent insertion, in order to promote preferential drainage of bile into the duodenum. The median time to resolution after successful ERCP was 4 days. Two patients underwent ERCP complicated by mild pancreatitis. The median hospital stay was 15 days (range, 10-31 days) post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ERCP was performed 4-6 weeks later to document healing of the leaking point and to remove the stent. Routine follow was at median 50 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that postoperative minor biliary injuries can be successful managed by endoscopic ERCP biliary decompression.

KEY WORDS

Bile leak, Bile duct injury, Biliary fistula, Endoscopy, ERCP, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy decreased the recurrent cholangitis after clearance of bile duct stones by ERCP in patients with gallstone-related cholangitis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed whether cholecystectomy can decrease recurrent cholangitis and all-cause mortality in patients who received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and successful clearance of bile duct (BD) stones after gallstone-related cholangitis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance research database of Taiwan. Patients who had gallstone-related cholangitis and underwent successful endoscopic clearance of BD stones were eligible for enrollment. This population-based, propensity score (PS)-matched cohort study involved 2 cohorts; (1) patients who underwent cholecystectomy after ERCP with BD stone clearance as the study group; and (2) those who had no cholecystectomy after ERCP with BD stone clearance as the control group. The primary endpoint was recurrent cholangitis, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During a mean 5.7-year follow-up, the incidence rates of recurrent cholangitis were 20.47 per 1000 person-years in the cholecystectomy cohort, and 34.60 per 1000 person-years in the PS-matched control cohort. The risk of recurrent cholangitis was significantly lower in the cholecystectomy cohort than in the control cohort (HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.87; P = 0.006). The HR for all cause mortality among the cholecystectomy cohort was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.90; P = 0.006) compared with the control cohort.

CONCLUSION

Cholecystectomy decreased the recurrent cholangitis and all-cause mortality in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy and successful clearance of BD stones after gallstone-related cholangitis.

Diagnostic and therapeutic cholangioscopy in biliary diseases: a prospective study in Peru

INTRODUCTION

Cholangioscopy is a test that allows the evaluation of the biliary epithelium. It is used for diagnosis and management of biliary diseases.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the success rate of complete removal of difficult stones with the use of laser lithotripsy through cholangioscopy as well as its complications. Determine the visual impression accuracy of bile duct injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective and descriptive study. We included 39 patients between July 2016 and July 2017 with diagnosis of difficult stones in the biliary tract and indeterminate stenosis of the biliary tract that were submitted to cholangioscopy.

RESULTS

Success rate of complete removal of difficult stones was 65.3%, there was one complication. Two laser sessions were required in 4 of the 17 patients who obtained complete removal of the stones. The visual impression accuracy of lesions in the bile duct to determine malignancy coincided in all cases with the final diagnosis of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser lithotripsy allows a safe and effective treatment of the difficult stones of the bile duct. Precession of visual impression of lesions in the bile duct is very high.

Effect of endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage with/without endoscopic sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with biliary stricture (E-BEST): a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to endoscopic biliary stenting to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the non-inferiority of non-endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to stenting for naïve major duodenal papilla compared with endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to stenting in patients with biliary stricture.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a multicentre randomised controlled trial, for which we will recruit 370 patients with biliary stricture requiring endoscopic biliary stenting from 26 high-volume institutions in Japan. Patients will be randomly allocated to the endoscopic sphincterotomy group or the non-endoscopic sphincterotomy group. The main outcome measure is the incidence of pancreatitis within 2 days of initial transpapillary biliary drainage. Data will be analysed on completion of the study. We will calculate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the incidence of pancreatitis in each group and analyse weather the difference in both groups with 95% CIs is within the non-inferiority margin (6%) using the Wald method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the institutional review board of Hokkaido University Hospital (IRB: 016-0181). Results will be submitted for presentation at an international medical conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The University Hospital Medical Information Network ID: UMIN000025727 Pre-results.

Upper Gastrointestinal Conditions: Pancreatitis

The most common etiologies of acute pancreatitis are gallstones (particularly 5 mm or smaller) and alcohol consumption. The serum amylase level may be normal in up to one-fifth of patients with acute pancreatitis; therefore, this level by itself is not a reliable diagnostic factor. The serum lipase level has a higher positive predictive value and specificity compared with the amylase level. Acute biliary pancreatitis with evidence of cholangitis represents an emergency indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy within 24 hours of presentation. Early aggressive fluid rehydration with lactated Ringer solution and close monitoring within the first 12 to 24 hours may decrease risk of progression to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, prevent serious complications, improve morbidity, and decrease mortality from pancreatitis. Early enteral feeding reduces length of hospital stay, rate of infectious complications, and risks of morbidity and mortality. During a first hospitalization, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with gallstone pancreatitis. Without cholecystectomy, approximately 20% to 30% of patients are readmitted within the next 90 days with a biliary condition or acute pancreatitis, sometimes severe. Early diagnosis and intervention in patients with chronic pancreatitis may prevent irreversible pancreatic damage.

Continuing episodes of pain in recurrent acute pancreatitis: Prospective follow up on a standardised protocol with drugs and pancreatic endotherapy

AIM

To assess the outcomes of drug therapy (DT) followed by pancreatic endotherapy for continuing painful episodes in recurrent acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

DT comprised of pancreatic enzymes and anti-oxidants failing which, endotherapy (ET; pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement) was done. The frequency of pain, its visual analogue score (VAS), quality of life (QoL), serum C peptide and faecal elastase were compared between baseline and after 1 year of follow up in all patients and in the two subgroups on DT and ET. Response was defined as at least 50% reduction in the severity of pain to below a score of 5.

RESULTS

Of the thirty nine patients analysed, 21 (53.9%) responded to DT and 18 (46.1%) underwent ET. The VAS for pain (7.0 ± 2.0 vs 1.3 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and the number of days with pain per month decreased [1.0 (1.0, 2.0) vs 1.0 (0.0, 1.0), P < 0.001], and the QoL scores [55.0 (44.0, 66.0) vs 38.0 (32.00, 51.00), P < 0.01] improved significantly during follow up. Similar significant improvements were seen in patients in the subgroups of DT and ET except for QoL in ET. The serum C-peptide (P = 0.001) and FE (P < 0.001) levels improved significantly in the entire group and in the two subgroups of patients except for the C peptide levels in patients on DT.

CONCLUSION

A standardised protocol of DT, followed by ET decreased the intensity and frequency of pain in recurrent acute pancreatitis, enhanced QoL and improved pancreatic function.

[Knowing an infrequent complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography]

OBJECTIVE

Describe the clinical and tomographic characteristics in relation to the extra peritoneal distribution of collections and air in patients with periampullary perforation after performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational, descriptive study in patients with periampullary perforation after ERCP with or without sphincterotomy, treated in the Pancreas Surgery Service at Edgardo Rebagliati Martins Hospital, Lima, Peru between January 2013 and January 2015.

RESULTS

Ten patients with periampullary perforation after ERCP were included. 40% were male. The mean age was 47.2 years. 100% showed abdominal pain, fever 70%, 60% had jaundice, oral intolerance and vomiting. In 100% of cases the description of the procedure was for choledocolithiasis. Difficult cannulation is described in 80% of cases. Air or fluid was found in 90% in the right anterior pararenal space and the right perirenal, and the place where air or liquid is distributed less frequently was right extraperitoneal pelvis with 20%, in no caserevealed air in the mediastinum.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of a liquid collection and / or air in the retroperitoneal space right after ERCP without further involvement of the pancreatic gland should make us think of periampullary perforation, especially if you are in the right anterior pararenal space and perirenal space. This entity we call bilioretroperitoneo.

[Large balloon dilation for removal of choledocholithiasis difficult to extract: clinical experience]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the initial experience of the combined use of biliary sphincterotomy plus balloon dilatation of the papilla for management of large stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design: Retrospective, descriptive. This study included 18 patients in whom a hydrostatic dilatation of the papilla with large balloons was performed between June 2012 and April 2014. Patients had multiple large stones, tapered distal common bile duct, previous sphincterotomy, or peri/ intradiverticular papilla. CRE™ dilatation balloons with diameters ranging from 12 to 20 mm were used. Data were recorded as successful procedure, use of lithotripsy and complications during the procedure.

RESULTS

The average age was 66.1 years. There was a predominance of the female gender (66.7%). The average size of the bile duct stones was 16.7 mm. The main indications were: giant choledocholithiasis (12 patients, 66.7%) and tapered distal common bile duct (6 patients, 33.3%). The dilatation balloons diameter used were: 15 mm (8 patients, 44.4%), 18 mm (5 patients, 27.8%), 12 mm (3 patients, 16.7%) and 20 mm (2 patients, 11.1%). Complete stone clearance was achieved in 15 patients (83.3%). Lithotripsy was performed in 4 patients (22.2%). There were 3 patients in whom the removal with balloon was unsuccessful, performed surgical management. It was reported 1 case of mild acute pancreatitis (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a safe and effective technique for treatment of difficult bile duct stones.

A case report of motesanib-induced biliary sludge formation causing obstructive cholangitis with acute pancreatitis treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder toxicity was reported in most motesanib studies with varying frequency and at variable times after initiation of treatment.

METHOD AND RESULTS

A 44-year-old man was admitted due to severe epigastric pain. The patient was diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer 9 months ago and received 6 cycles of chemotherapy with motesanib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. Ultrasonography showed a large amount of sludge within gallbladder. Computed tomography scan demonstrated diffuse dilatation of biliary tree with distended gallbladder without evidence of stone and mild pancreatic swelling. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed yellowish viscous mucoid plug impacting ampullary orifice and dilated bile duct with amorphous filling defect at distal half of common duct. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed to prevent biliary obstruction and recurrent pancreatitis after removal of mucoid material.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of obstructive cholangitis and acute pancreatitis associated with sludge formation during motesanib therapy. Endoscopic sphincterotomy appears to be useful to treat and prevent biliary obstruction caused by motesanib-induced biliary sludge.

[Not Available]

Zusammenfassung. Gallensteine finden sich bei 10–20 % unserer Bevölkerung, und jährlich werden in der Schweiz gegen 15 000 Cholezystektomien durchgeführt. Grundsätzlich muss zwischen der Cholezystolithiasis (Gallenblasensteine) und der Choledocholithiasis (Gallengangsteine) unterschieden werden. Während der überwiegende Teil der Patienten mit (inzidentellen) Gallenblasensteinen lebenslang keine Beschwerden erleidet, können Gallengangsteine schwerwiegende Komplikationen (z.B. Cholangitis, Pankreatitis) verursachen. Laborchemisch erhöhte Transaminasen und Cholestaseparameter sind bei einer Cholezystolithiasis selten und müssen (bei passender, biliärer Klinik) an eine Choledocholithiasis denken lassen. Bildgebend kommt im Falle von biliären Symptomen primär eine abdominale Sonografie, bei Verdacht auf eine Choledocholithiasis allenfalls zusätzlich eine MRC (Magnetresonanzcholangiografie) oder EUS (Endosonografie) zum Einsatz. Therapie der Wahl bei symptomatischer Cholezystolithiasis sowie nach biliären Komplikationen ist die laparoskopische Cholezystektomie, während Gallengangsteine meist anlässlich einer ERC (endoskopisch retrograde Cholangiografie) mit Papillotomie entfernt werden können.

Common bile duct perforation sealed with a metal fully-covered stent

A common bile duct perforation due to sphincteroplasty is reported. It was managed by temporary insertion of a metal fully covered stent with good outcomes. Images from the procedure are provided.

Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) is useful for decreasing early complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), including bleeding, biliary infection, and perforation, but it is generally avoided in Western countries because of a relatively high reported incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). However, as the efficacy of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation (EPLBD) becomes widely recognized, EPBD is attracting attention. Here we investigate whether EPBD is truly a risk factor for PEP, and seek safer and more effective EPBD procedures by reviewing past studies. We reviewed thirteen randomised control trials comparing EPBD and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and ten studies comparing direct EPLBD and EST. Three randomized controlled trials of EPBD showed significantly higher incidence of PEP than EST, but no study of EPLBD did. Careful analysis of these studies suggested that longer and higher-pressure inflation of balloons might decrease PEP incidence. The paradoxical result that EPBD with small-calibre balloons increases PEP incidence while EPLBD does not may be due to insufficient papillary dilatation in the former. Insufficient dilatation could cause the high incidence of PEP through the use of mechanical lithotripsy and stress on the papilla at the time of stone removal. Sufficient dilation of the papilla may be useful in preventing PEP.

[Spontaneous liver rupture in a patient with choledocholithiasis resolved by ERCP]

We present the case of a 34 years old female patient who presents with abdominal pain and elevated total and direct bilirrubins, so she underwent ERCP Reporting: a) successful sphincterotomy without complications, b) choledocholithias is endoscopically resolved, c) secondary cholangitis. She developed significant abdominal pain at 72 h, with hypovolemic shock and peritoneal irritation. She was taken to the surgery, finding a grade III liver laceration. This one was resolved with liver raffia and packing, during the same operative time cholecystectomy was performed. A second look was performed at 24 h, achieving adequate control of bleeding after placing hemostatic (Nexstat®). The patient developed a subdiaphragmatic abscess which needed drainage by another laparotomy. After which the patient had a satisfactory evolution, so she was discharged.

Giant staghorn common bile duct calculus

Background - Stones in common bile duct are defined as 'large' if they are more than 15 mm in size. There are very few reports which describe a giant stone measuring 5 cm or more and exceptionally a staghorn calculus in the common bile duct. Purpose - The purpose is to report a new rare case of giant staghorn gallstone and discuss the diagnostic approach and therapeutic possibilities. Case report - We report a case of a giant staghorn common bile duct calculus in a 65-year-old patient. Its removal required 2 operations and an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Conclusion - Lithiasis of the common bile duct is considered to be a benign, but may sometimes be complicated and time-consuming. Staghorn calculi are very rare in the biliary tract. We found only two published reports of staghorn common bile duct calculi.

[Sphincterotomy followed by papillary large balloon in the management of cholecolithiasis. Therapeutic success and safety in a Lima-Peru hospital]

OBJECTIVE

We present a descriptive analysis of our cases of sphincterotomy followed by papillary large balloon dilation in a single session (ES-LBD) in the management of difficult to extract calculi, with the objective of assessing rates of therapeutic success and complications in local experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

ERCP procedures with ES-LBD performed for choledocholithiasis between January 2009 and December 2014 in patients older than 18 years and without preexistent sphincterotomy were selected from records of the Gastroenterology Service at Cayetano Heredia National Hospital. A descriptive analysis of therapeutic success and complications was performed.

RESULTS

73 procedures in 73 patients were included (65.8% female, 34.2% male). Patient's average age was 59.4±19.8 years. Average diameter of calculi was 14.6±3.3mm. Average diameter of dilations was 14.6±2.27 mm. In 8 cases mechanical lithotripsy was performed. Complete calculi extraction was achieved in 56 procedures (76.7%). Complications occurred in 4 cases (5.5%). There were no deaths.

CONCLUSION

Our figures of therapeutic success and complications with ES-LBD for difficult to extract calculi are similar to those reported in literature. ES-LBD is an effective and safe technique for management of choledocholithiasis.

Intraoperative Cholangiography Can Be Safely Omitted during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study of 413 Consecutive Patients

Background and Aims:

The aim of the study was to show that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be performed safely without intraoperative cholangiography (IOC).

Material and Methods:

We conducted a prospective study of 413 consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, who underwent LC. According to the preoperative clinical, laboratory and ultrasound criteria, 38 patients (9.2 %) were selected for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). All patients were followed postoperatively for symptoms and signs of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Results:

Preoperative ERC allowed to make a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in 22 (58 %) of the 38 selected patients. Stone clearance was achieved with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in all cases. Three patients (7.9 %) had an episode of mild self-limited pancreatitis after the procedure. Eight patients (1.9 %) of 413 required conversion from LC to open cholecystectomy. There were no CBD injuries and no death cases. Of the postoperative complications, 1.5 % were recorded during hospital stay. During the follow-up period, for at least 2 years after surgery, retained CBD stones were verified in 6 patients (1.5 %); however, the supposed rate of residual stones was 2.4 %.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that performance of selective preoperative ERC with ES when necessary, followed by LC, is an appropriate and safe approach to the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and unsuspected choledocholithiasis. This approach allows to omit IOC and to perform LC safely without biliary duct injuries, ensuring low rate of retained CBD stones in the late follow-up period.

Single-stage management with combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a single stage with combined tri-endoscopic (duodenoscopy, laparoscopy and choledochoscopy) approach for patients with concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with combined gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones from February 2014 to April 2015 were randomized assigned to two groups: 29 patients underwent single-stage surgery with combined duodenoscope, laparoscope and choledochoscope (combined tri-endoscopic group), and 29 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove common bile duct stones followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy several days later (control group). The success rate of complete stone removal, procedure-related complication, hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Altogether, 53 patients (29 patients in combined tri-endoscopic group and 24 patients in control group) successfully underwent the surgery and ERCP procedure. Three patients in the control group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. One case of bile leaking and one case of residual stone were noted in the combined tri-endoscopic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to both complete stone removal [96.6 % (28/29) vs. 100 % (24/24)] and procedure-related complication rate [3.4 % (1/29) vs. 12.5 % (3/24)] (p > 0.05). No open surgery was required in either group. There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to hospital stay (6.72 ± 1.3 days vs. 10.91 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01) and cost of hospitalization (15,724 ± 1613 CNY vs. 19,829 ± 2433 CNY, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The single-stage combined tri-endoscopic approach for concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis was just as safe and successful as the control group. In addition, it resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less cost.

Ampullary neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed by endoscopic papillectomy in previously confirmed ampullary adenoma

Ampullary adenoma is a common indication for endoscopic papillectomy. Ampullary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is a rare disease for which complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice. However, because of the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection, endoscopic papillectomy is increasingly used in selected cases of low grade, with no metastasis and no invasion of the pancreatic or bile duct. Also, confirmed and complete endoscopic resection of ampullary NET accompanied by adenoma has not been reported to date. We report herein a rare case of an ampullary NET accompanied with adenoma, which was successfully and completely resected via endoscopic papillectomy. Prior to papillectomy, this case was diagnosed as an ampullary adenoma.

Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions

Duodenal polyps or lesions are uncommonly found on upper endoscopy. Duodenal lesions can be categorized as subepithelial or mucosally-based, and the type of lesion often dictates the work-up and possible therapeutic options. Subepithelial lesions that can arise in the duodenum include lipomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and carcinoids. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration is useful in the characterization and diagnosis of subepithelial lesions. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors and large or multifocal carcinoids are best managed by surgical resection. Brunner's gland tumors, solitary Peutz-Jeghers polyps, and non-ampullary and ampullary adenomas are mucosally-based duodenal lesions, which can require removal and are typically amenable to endoscopic resection. Several anatomic characteristics of the duodenum make endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions challenging. However, advanced endoscopic techniques exist that enable the resection of large mucosally-based duodenal lesions. Endoscopic papillectomy is not without risk, but this procedure can effectively resect ampullary adenomas and allows patients to avoid surgery, which typically involves pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopic mucosal resection and its variations (such as cap-assisted, cap-band-assisted, and underwater techniques) enable the safe and effective resection of most duodenal adenomas. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is possible but very difficult to safely perform in the duodenum.

Cholecystectomy for Prevention of Recurrence after Endoscopic Clearance of Bile Duct Stones in Korea

PURPOSE

Cholecystectomy in patients with an intact gallbladder after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) remains controversial. We conducted a case-control study to determine the risk of recurrent CBD stones and the benefit of cholecystectomy for prevention of recurrence after endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD in Korean patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 317 patients who underwent endoscopic CBD stone extraction between 2006 and 2012 were included. Possible risk factors for the recurrence of CBD stones including previous cholecystectomy history, bile duct diameter, stone size, number of stones, stone composition, and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up after CBD stone extraction was 25.4±22.0 months. A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger [odds ratio (OR), 1.930; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.098 to 3.391; p=0.022] and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum (OR, 1.859; 95% CI, 1.014 to 3.408; p=0.045) were independent predictive factors for CBD stone recurrence. Seventeen patients (26.6%) in the recurrence group underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones, compared to 88 (34.8%) in the non-recurrence group; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.212).

CONCLUSION

A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were found to be potential predictive factors for recurrence after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones. Elective cholecystectomy after clearance of CBD stones did not reduce the incidence of recurrent CBD stones in Korean patients.

Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Choledochocystolithiasis can be managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or laparoscopically by transcystic (TC) or transductal (TD) stone extraction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review safety and effectiveness of combined endoscopic/laparoscopic management versus total laparoscopic management for choledochocystolithiasis with specific emphasis on TC versus TD stone extraction.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched systematically to identify trials on combined endoscopic/laparoscopic and total laparoscopic management for choledochocystolithiasis. Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration was divided into TD and TC approach. Primary outcomes were successful stone clearance from CBD, postoperative/procedural morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eight randomized trials with 965 patients were included. Successful bile duct clearance varied between 52.6 and 97 % in the ERCP groups, 80.4 and 100 % in the TC groups, and 58.3 and 100 % in the TD groups. There were more bile leaks after TD stone extraction (11 %) than after ERCP (1 %) and TC stone extraction (1.7 %). Total morbidity varied between 9.1 and 38.3 % in the ERCP groups, 7 and 10.5 % in the TC groups, and 18.4 and 26.7 % in the TD groups. Methodological and statistical heterogeneity among the trials precluded a meaningful meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Stone clearance rates are comparable between the three modalities, but TD stone extraction is associated with a higher risk of bile leaks and should only be performed by highly experienced surgeons. TC stone extraction seems a more accessible technique with lower complication rates. If unsuccessful, per- or postoperative endoscopic stone extraction is a viable option.

Endoscopic snare papillectomy for a solitary Peutz-Jeghers-type polyp in the duodenum with ingrowth into the common bile duct: Case report

Solitary duodenal Peutz-Jeghers (PJ)-type hamartomatous polyps are rare and considered a different disease entity than classic PJ syndrome. We describe the case of an 89-year-old man admitted to our emergency department with symptoms of acute cholangitis, liver dysfunction, and slight jaundice. Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple signal voids, reflecting choledocholithiasis, and an oval-shaped tumor in the common bile duct (CBD). Following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, the patient was diagnosed with a lower CBD tumor 20 mm in diameter. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for choledocholithotomy, resulting in the expulsion of a large tumor with a stalk connected to the papilla of Vater. The tumor was successfully excised en bloc by endoscopic snare papillectomy. Histopathologic examination showed that the tumor was a PJ-type hamartomatous polyp. No mucocutaneous pigmentation of the skin was evident and the patient’s family history was negative. Solitary duodenal PJ-type hamartomatous polyps are usually diagnosed incidentally during endoscopy for other indications because most of these tumors are asymptomatic or have nonspecific presentations. To our knowledge, this is the first reported solitary PJ-type polyp with intra-CBD growth treated by endoscopic snare papillectomy.

Prognostic Factors and Postoperative Recurrence of Calculus Following Small-Incision Sphincterotomy with Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Intractable Choledocholithiasis: A 72-Month Follow-Up Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the recurrence of common bile duct stones and risk factors for recurrence following routine endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) versus small-incision endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EST-EPBD).

METHODS

Three hundred patients who were hospitalized between June 2007 and June 2008 with common bile duct stones >10 mm in diameter were randomly assigned to the EST or EST-EPBD group. We compared the short-term (≤3 years) and long-term (>3 years) recurrence of ductal stones in the two groups over a 72-month follow-up period. Potential risk factors were evaluated using a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients completed the study. The short-term recurrence rate in the EST group was not significantly higher than that in the EST-EPBD group (P > 0.05). The long-term recurrence rate for the EST group was significantly higher than that for the EST-EPBD group (P < 0.05). The serum level of cholesterol, body mass index, gallstones, maximum stone diameter, number of stones, and mechanical lithotripsy were risk factors for the recurrence of ductal stones. Minimal size of the duodenal papilla incision was a protective factor with regard to the recurrence of ductal stones. Cholecystectomy, sex, and age were not associated with the recurrence of ductal stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-incision EST-EPBD has a similar overall success rate and a significantly lower rate of the recurrence of ductal stones, compared with those of EST alone. Thus, the curative effect of EST-EPBD is better than that of EST alone. Minimal size of the duodenal papilla incision protects against the recurrence of ductal stones.

Portal biliopathy as a complication of extrahepatic portal hypertension: etiology, presentation and management

Portal biliopathy (PB) refers to the biliary abnormalities of the biliary ducts observed in patients with extrahepatic portal hypertension. Although majority of patients are asymptomatic, approximately 20% of these patients present with biliary symptoms (pain, pruritus, jaundice, cholangitis). The pathogenesis of PB is uncertain but compression by dilated veins into or around common bile duct may play the main role. CT-scan, MR cholangiopancreatography with MR portography should be the initial investigations in the evaluation of PB. Treatment is limited to symptomatic cases and is dictated by clinical manifestations and complications of the disease. Treatment of PB could be done by endoscopy (sphincterotomy, stone extraction or biliary stenting of the common bile duct) or surgery (definitive decompression by porto-systemic shunt followed by bilioenteric anastomosis, if necessary). This review describes pathogenesis, clinical features, investigation and management of portal biliopathy.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Type III: New studies suggest new approaches are needed

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) has been classified into three types based upon the presence or absence of objective findings including liver test abnormalities and bile duct dilatation. Type III is the most controversial and is classified as biliary type pain in the absence of any these objective findings. Many prior studies have shown that the clinical response to endoscopic therapy is higher based upon the presence of these objective criteria. However, there has been variable correlation of the manometry findings to outcome after endoscopic therapy. Nevertheless, manometry and sphincterotomy has been recommended for Type III patients given the overall response rate of 33%, although the reported response rates are highly variable. However, all of the prior data was non-blinded and non-randomized with variable follow-up. The evaluating predictors in SOD study - a prospective randomized blinded sham controlled one year outcome study showed no correlation between manometric findings and outcome after sphincterotomy. Furthermore, patients receiving sham therapy had a statistically significantly better outcome than those undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy. This study calls into question the whole concept of SOD Type III and, based upon prior physiologic studies, one can suggest that SOD Type III likely represents a right upper quadrant functional abdominal pain syndrome and should be treated as such.

Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a patient with situs inversus viscerum

Situs inversus viscerum (SIV) is a rare congenital condition characterized by complete transposition of all viscera. This anatomical pathology makes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) technically difficult. We report a new case of a 70-year-old Chinese male with total SIV who had obstructive jaundice. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated a number of stones in the gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD). Therapeutic ERCP was performed to relieve biliary obstruction and remove the CBD stones. This procedure started with the patient in a supine position and the endoscopist at the left side of the table. When the papilla was maintained, the patient was repositioned to a prone position and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation procedures were conducted. ERCP was performed successfully and relevant complications did not occur in this patient. We also present a review of the literature published between 1985 and 2014 in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. There were eight published cases during this period, with one each from America, Finland, India, Italy, South Korea and Pakistan, and two from Spain. Our case is the first reported in China.

[A meta-analysis of preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficiency of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (POES) versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES) in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were searched for prospective, randomized, controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of POES versus IOES. And the outcome parameters of clearance rate, post-procedural complications and hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five trials with 631 patients (POES, n=318; IOES, n=313) were analyzed. Although the overall rates of common bile duct stone clearance were similar between POES and IOES (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01; P=0.13), the failure rate of CBD cannulation was significantly higher for IOES (RR 2.54, 95% CI: 1.23-5.26; P=0.01) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The pooled RR after POES for overall complication rates was similar to that for IOES (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.94-2.59; P=0.09). However, as compared with IOES, the RR risk of ERCP-related complications was significantly higher for POES (RR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.18-4.40, P=0.01). No significant inter-group differences existed in morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy or subsequent conversion into open surgery. In subgroup analyses, the rates of hemorrhage, perforation, cholangitis, cholecystitis, and gastric ulceration showed no significant inter-group differences.

CONCLUSION

With regards to stone clearance and overall complication rate, POES is comparable to IOES in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones. However, IOES has a lowered incidence of ERCP-related pancreatitis and a shorter hospital stay.

Nasobiliary drainage after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation may prevent postoperative pancreatitis

AIM: To evaluate the necessity of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) catheter placement after clearance of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

METHODS: Patients enrolled in this study were randomly divided into two groups, according to whether or not they received ENBD after the removal of CBD stones. Group 1 (ENBD group) was then subdivided into three groups: G1a patients received an endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD), G1b patients received an endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and G1c patients received neither. Group 2 (non-ENBD group) patients were also subdivided into three groups (G2a, G2b, and G2c), similar to Group 1. The maximum CBD diameter, the time for C-reactive protein (CRP) to normalize, levels of serum amylase, total serum bilirubin (TB) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and postoperative hospitalization duration (PHD) were measured.

RESULTS: A total of 218 patients (139 males, 79 females), with an average age of 60.1 ± 10.8 years, were enrolled in this study. One hundred and thirteen patients who received ENBD were included in Group 1, and 105 patients who did not receive ENBD were included in Group 2. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications when Groups 1 and 2 were compared. Seventy-seven patients underwent EPBD, and 41 received an ENBD tube (G1a) and 36 did not (G2a). Seventy-three patients underwent EST, and 34 patients received an ENBD tube (G1b) and 39 did not (G2b). The remaining 68 patients underwent neither EPBD nor EST; of these patients, 38 received an ENBD tube (G1c) and 30 did not (G2c). For each of the three pairs of subgroups (G1a vs G2a, G1b vs G2b, G1c vs G2c), there were no significant differences detected in the PHD or the time to normalization of CRP, TB and ALT. In the EPBD group, the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia and overall patient complications was significantly higher for G2a (post-ERCP pancreatitis: 6/36 vs 0/41, P = 0.0217; hyperamylasemia: 11/36 vs 4/41, P = 0.0215; overall patient complications: 18/36 vs 7/41, P = 0.0029).

CONCLUSION: After successful CBD stone clearance, ENBD is only beneficial when an EPBD procedure has been performed.