Pretransplant cellular alloimmunity as assessed by a panel of reactive T cells assay correlates with acute renal graft rejection

BACKGROUND

The panel reactive antibody test (PRA) is an established method for assessing posttransplant risk of immune-mediated graft injury. The panel of reactive T cell assay (PRT) in which transplant candidates' peripheral blood mononuclear cells are tested for reactivity to a panel of allogenic stimulator cells by the IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay analogously assesses the strength of the pretransplant effector-memory alloreactive T cell repertoire.

METHODS

PRT assays were performed in 30 kidney transplant candidates and results were correlated with acute rejection (AR). A positive PRT assay was defined as a response to at least 75% of the stimulators tested.

RESULTS

A positive pretransplant PRT test was observed in 11 of 30 (37%) patients, and AR within 1 year posttransplantation was seen in 7 of 30 (23%) subjects. Six of the seven (86%) patients with AR were PRT-positive (P=0.01) whereas only one of seven (14%) patients with a PRA greater than 15% had AR. The mean pretransplant PRT percentage was 40% for patients with no AR versus 81% for patients with AR (P=0.01). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2) showed a trend towards a lower value in PRT-positive (48+/-15) versus PRT-negative (55+/-13) individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that pretransplant PRT screening can identify patients at risk for posttransplant cellular immune mediated graft injury despite the absence of humoral allosensitization. Once confirmed by larger prospective trials, PRT screening could be used to guide clinical decision-making with regard to choosing donor organs and individualizing immunosuppression regimens.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Hemodialysis vintage, black ethnicity, and pretransplantation antidonor cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients

Prolonged exposure to dialysis before transplantation and black ethnicity are known risk factors for acute rejection and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Because the strength of the primed antidonor T cell repertoire before transplantation also is associated with rejection and graft dysfunction, this study sought to determine whether hemodialysis (HD) vintage and/or black ethnicity affected donor-directed T cell immunity. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay was used to measure the frequency of peripheral T cells that expressed IFN-gamma in response to donor stimulator cells before transplantation in 100 kidney recipients. Acute rejection occurred in 38% of ELISPOT (+) patients versus 14% of ELISPOT (-) patients (P = 0.008). The median (HD) vintage was 46 mo (0 to 125 mo) in ELISPOT (+) patients versus 24 mo (0 to 276 mo) in ELISPOT (-) patients (P = 0.009). Black recipients had a greater median HD vintage (55 versus 14 mo in nonblack recipients; P < 0.001). Black recipients with less HD exposure had a low incidence of an ELISPOT (+) test, similar to nonblack recipients. Among variables examined, only HD vintage remained a significant positive correlate with an ELISPOT (+) result (odds ratio per year of HD 1.3; P = 0.003). These data suggest that the risk for developing cross-reactive antidonor T cell immunity increases with longer HD vintage, providing an explanation for the previously observed relationship between increased dialysis exposure and worse posttransplantation outcome. Longer HD vintage may also explain the increased T cell alloreactivity that previously was observed in black kidney recipients.

Long-term graft outcomes after steroid withdrawal in African American kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

We previously reported excellent short-term outcomes in African American kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus/sirolimus and withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy three months after transplantation. We now report the long-term outcomes of patients subjected to this protocol.

METHODS

In all, 47 African American kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in an uncontrolled trial in which they were initially treated with sirolimus, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids, without antibody induction therapy. Eligible patients were withdrawn from prednisone between three and five months posttransplant, and followed for acute rejection and changes in renal function. Outcomes (group 1, n=32) were compared to those of patients deemed not to be candidates for steroid withdrawal (group 2, n=15).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 48.5 months, 13 of 32 patients (41%) in group 1 developed acute rejection; only 13 patients (41%) remain steroid-free. Nine of 13 rejection episodes were associated with noncompliance. Graft loss occurred in 8 of 32 patients (25%) in group 1 and in 5 of 15 patients (33%) in group 2 (P=NS). Serum creatinine rose from 1.4+/-0.41 to 2.45+/-1.7 mg/dL in group 1 (P=0.004) and from 2.1+/-0.45 to 2.62+/-1.2 mg/dL (P=NS) in group 2. Among 13 patients in group 1 who remain steroid-free, creatinine concentration has risen from 1.28+/-.0.37 prior to steroid withdrawal to 1.64+0.54 at last follow-up (P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Late noncompliance and/or rejection in African Americans withdrawn from steroids have a negative impact on long-term graft function and survival. Steroid withdrawal may be associated with long-term deterioration of renal function, even in the absence of overt acute rejection.

Differential Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine on Everolimus

OBJECTIVE

We characterized the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and everolimus in a combined immunosuppressive regimen.

METHODS

This was an open-label exploratory trial in eight maintenance renal transplant patients with calcineurin inhibitor intolerance initially receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus. At enrollment, MMF was discontinued and replaced with everolimus 1.5 mg twice a day in study period 1 (days 1 to 10). In period 2 (day 11 to month 3), tacrolimus dose was reduced by half.

RESULTS

At study entry tacrolimus trough level (C0) was 7.9 +/- 3.9 ng/mL and area under the curve over a dosing interval (AUC) was 132 +/- 56 ng x h/mL. The addition of everolimus in period 1 did not change tacrolimus exposure: C0 8.4 +/- 4.0 ng/mL, AUC 134 +/- 70 ng x h/mL. Everolimus pharmacokinetics in the presence of tacrolimus in period 1 were: C0 3.3 +/- 1.2 ng/mL, Cmax 10.4 +/- 5.1 ng/mL, AUC 58 +/- 20 ng x h/mL. When compared to pharmacokinetic data from a previous study in 47 renal transplant patients receiving everolimus at the same fixed dose (1.5 mg twice a day) with cyclosporine, everolimus exposure was 2.5-fold higher with cyclosporine relative to the data in this study with tacrolimus. After tacrolimus dose reduction in period 2, there was no clinically relevant change in everolimus exposure: C0 3.0 +/- 1.1 ng/mL, Cmax 8.2 +/- 1.3 ng/mL, AUC 49 +/- 10 ng x h/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus appears to have a minimal effect on everolimus blood levels compared with the influence of cyclosporine. The dose of everolimus when combined with tacrolimus needs to be higher than when combined with cyclosporine in order to reach a given everolimus blood level.

Differences in proteinuria and graft function in de novo sirolimus-based vs. calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in live donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor(CNI)-free protocols using sirolimus (SRL) in kidney transplantation have proven effective, although reports have linked SRL to proteinuria. We sought to investigate this link and its impact on graft function.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 184 live donor kidney transplant recipients who exclusively received de novo CNI-based (n = 106) or SRL-based (n = 78) regimens. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and semi-quantitative dipstick proteinuria measurements were obtained at one, six, 12, and 24 months and six and 12 months, respectively.

RESULTS

SRL-treated patients had higher frequencies of proteinuria (> or =1+) at 6 months (40.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.006) and 12 months (37.8% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.004) than those treated with CNI. Independent predictors of proteinuria at 12 months were GFR at one month (OR 0.62 per 10 ml/min/1.73 m, P<0.001), delayed graft function (OR 11.5, P = 0.02), and a SRL-based regimen (OR 4.18, P=0.002). By univariable analysis, SRL vs. CNI patients had higher GFR at each point. SRL-treated patients without proteinuria had higher GFR at 12 months compared to CNI-treated patients with and without proteinuria (66 vs. 50 or 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P < 0.05). No difference in GFR was seen between SRL-treated patients with proteinuria vs. CNI-treated patients without proteinuria (57 vs. 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P > 0.05). Absence of proteinuria and a SRL-based regimen remained independently associated FS with higher GFR at 12 months by multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo SRL-based immunosuppression is associated with a higher frequency of semi-quantitative proteinuria, however, estimated graft function at 1 year posttransplant remains superior to that of CNI-treated patients. Nevertheless, the long-term implications of these findings need to be determined.

Steroid Sparing in Kidney Transplantation: Changing Paradigms, Improving Outcomes, and Remaining Questions

The widely known adverse effects of long-term therapy with corticosteroids have motivated increasing interest in steroid-free immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Results from recent trials that used newer immunosuppressants to facilitate elimination of steroids suggest better short-term results than were achieved in an earlier era. However, the best results have been reported in uncontrolled trials of low-risk patients or in randomized trials with relatively short periods of follow-up. Increasingly, the therapeutic paradigm has shifted from late withdrawal of steroids to very early withdrawal after transplantation or even complete avoidance. Induction antibody therapy has been used routinely in the most successful trials that involved early steroid withdrawal or avoidance. Although the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who are treated with steroid-free immunosuppression are improving steadily, there still is room for concern in recommending this strategy as a standard of practice.

Improved Renal Function after Conversion from Tacrolimus/Sirolimus to Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination.

METHODS

We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78).

RESULTS

TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.

Panel of reactive T cells as a measurement of primed cellular alloimmunity in kidney transplant candidates

Pretransplantation panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing assesses posttransplantation risk for antibody-mediated graft injury. It was postulated analogously that screening for effector/memory alloreactive T cells by "panel of reactive T cells" (PRT) using IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays would evaluate independently cellular alloimmunity in transplant candidates. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from 41 hemodialysis patients who were awaiting first renal transplants were tested against a panel of allogeneic stimulator cells. Positive assays were defined arbitrarily as >25 spots/300,000 peripheral blood lymphocytes, and positive PRT was defined as when the responder reacted to 40 or 75% (PRT-75) of the stimulators. Seventeen percent of patients were PRT-75+, whereas 32% were PRA+. Twelve percent of the cohort was PRT-75+/PRA-, and only 5% of the patients were PRA+/PRT-75+, indicating that T cell alloreactivity did not routinely imply B cell sensitization and vice versa. PRT-75+ patients were more likely to be younger (<55 yr) and black. In contrast, a positive PRA was significantly associated with female gender but not race or age. Pretransplantation screening of cellular alloimmunity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot-based PRT detects a subset of hemodialysis patients who differ from those that are PRA+. Preliminary correlations with posttransplantation outcome in seven recipients suggest that PRT screening has the potential to aid in risk assessment in renal transplant candidates.

Analysis of Immune Markers in Human Cardiac Allograft Recipients and Association With Coronary Artery Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Because coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV) is a common cause of late cardiac allograft loss in humans, there is a need to develop and test non-invasive surrogate markers capable of detecting and predicting this disease entity.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of immune-based surrogate markers in 65 primary cardiac allograft recipients with or without angiographically documented CAV. Anti-donor cellular immunity was determined by interferon gamma (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays using donor HLA-derived peptides (indirect pathway), and anti-donor alloantibodies were detected by flow cytometry using HLA-coated beads.

RESULTS

Anti-donor cellular and humoral immunity were detected more frequently in patients with CAV (17 of 32, 53.1%) than in controls (4 of 33, 12.1%) (p < 0.001). Anti-donor cellular and humoral immunity were detected in different sub-groups of CAV patients; peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from only 1 of 32 CAV patients reacted to donor peptides with simultaneous detection of peripheral anti-donor alloantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune reactivity in cardiac transplant recipients with CAV differs significantly from those without CAV and the detected responses are heterogeneous in nature. Serial assessments of anti-donor immunity using different methods will be required to detect and possibly predict outcome in cardiac transplant recipients.

Pre-transplant IFN-gamma ELISPOTs are associated with post-transplant renal function in African American renal transplant recipients

Final crossmatch testing is routinely used to assess the risk of antibody-mediated graft injury/rejection post-transplant. Analogously, we postulated that quantitative measurements of anti-donor effector/memory T cells pre-transplant would independently assess post-transplant risk. To address this hypothesis, we determined the frequencies of pre-transplant, donor-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spots (ELISPOTs) and correlated the results with post-transplant outcomes in 37 African American recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus- and sirolimus-based immunosuppression. A positive ELISPOT test (>25 spots/300,000 cells) was detected in 14 (38%) of 37 patients. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 50% (7/14) in ELISPOT-positive versus 17% (4/23) in ELISPOT-negative patients (p=0.036). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD) at 12 months was 37+/-16 mL/min in ELISPOT-positive versus 55+/-20 mL/min in ELISPOT-negative patients (p=0.01). ELISPOT status remained a correlate of allograft function at 12 months by linear regression analysis (p=0.001), independent of rejection and other contributing variables. Pre-transplant donor-directed IFN-gamma ELISPOT assessment of anti-donor cellular immunity may function as a 'cellular crossmatch' and independently correlates with renal allograft function in African Americans receiving tacrolimus- and sirolimus-based immunosuppression.

Heterogeneous Alterations in Human Alloimmunity Associated with Immunization

BACKGROUND

The presence of alloantibodies and/or alloreactive T cells in a patient prior to a transplant can impact graft outcome. Environmental factors, including therapeutic vaccinations, may influence the strength and/or specificity of alloimmunity.

METHODS

To address this issue, we prospectively evaluated the effects of two different immunization protocols in human subjects on cellular alloimmunity using an IFNgamma ELISPOT assay and on alloantibody reactivity by flow cytometric analysis of HLA-coated beads.

RESULTS

Vaccination/immunization was associated with augmentation of cellular and/or humoral alloimmune reactivity in >50% of the test subjects. The effects were heterogeneous in that some detected increases were transient, peaking 30-60 days postimmunization, whereas others persisted for the length of the study. Antibodies reactive to the immunizing agent did not cross react with the detected alloantibodies, suggesting that the augmentation of alloimmune reactivity was most likely due to a nonspecific adjuvant effect from the vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic vaccinations can alter the strength of cellular and humoral alloimmunity in humans. The results suggest that serial immune monitoring of alloreactivity might be beneficial when immunizations are administered to potential transplant recipients.

Comparative effects of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on erythropoiesis in kidney transplant patients

Anemia and erythrocytosis (PTE) are common after kidney transplantation. We sought to determine the influence of sirolimus compared to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on post-transplant erythropoiesis. A total of 214 patients with recent kidney or kidney-pancreas transplants were treated with either sirolimus-based (n = 87) or MMF-based (n = 127) therapy. At 12 months, the prevalence of anemia was 31% with MMF and 57% with sirolimus (p < 0.001). Linear regression was used to examine the independent influence of sirolimus on hemoglobin at 12 months, controlling for multiple factors including gender and renal function. Sirolimus remained a significant correlate of lower hemoglobin in all patients (slope =-1.060, 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.362, p = 0.003), and in patients without PTE (slope =-0.671, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.028, p = 0.041). PTE, defined as a persistent hematocrit above 51%, occurred in 19% with MMF and 7% with sirolimus (p = 0.013). PTE was examined using logistic regression analysis. Sirolimus use correlated negatively with PTE (odds ratio with sirolimus = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.89, p = 0.028). Our results indicate that, compared to treatment with MMF, treatment of kidney or kidney-pancreas recipients with sirolimus is associated with a higher prevalence of anemia, lower hemoglobin levels and lower incidence of PTE.

Comparative effects of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on erythropoiesis in kidney transplant patients

Anemia and erythrocytosis (PTE) are common after kidney transplantation. We sought to determine the influence of sirolimus compared to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on post-transplant erythropoiesis. A total of 214 patients with recent kidney or kidney-pancreas transplants were treated with either sirolimus-based (n = 87) or MMF-based (n = 127) therapy. At 12 months, the prevalence of anemia was 31% with MMF and 57% with sirolimus (p < 0.001). Linear regression was used to examine the independent influence of sirolimus on hemoglobin at 12 months, controlling for multiple factors including gender and renal function. Sirolimus remained a significant correlate of lower hemoglobin in all patients (slope =-1.060, 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.362, p = 0.003), and in patients without PTE (slope =-0.671, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.028, p = 0.041). PTE, defined as a persistent hematocrit above 51%, occurred in 19% with MMF and 7% with sirolimus (p = 0.013). PTE was examined using logistic regression analysis. Sirolimus use correlated negatively with PTE (odds ratio with sirolimus = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.89, p = 0.028). Our results indicate that, compared to treatment with MMF, treatment of kidney or kidney-pancreas recipients with sirolimus is associated with a higher prevalence of anemia, lower hemoglobin levels and lower incidence of PTE.

Alloreactivity in Renal Transplant Recipients with and without Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

The pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) involves both immunologic (antigen-dependent) and nonimmunologic (antigen-independent) mechanisms. In order to provide further insight into the immunologic basis of this disease, a cross-sectional analysis of cellular and humoral immunity in human renal allograft recipients with or without deteriorating renal function and biopsy proven CAN was performed. Interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays were used to assess cellular immunity to donor, or fully mismatched third-party stimulator cells (direct pathway), and to synthetic peptides derived from donor HLA molecules (indirect pathway). Anti-HLA antibodies were evaluated by flow cytometry using HLA-coated beads. Both the mean frequencies of donor-reactive peripheral blood lymphocytes and the number of individuals who responded to donor antigens per group were statistically higher in CAN patients versus control subjects (P < 0.02). Calculated ratios of donor/third-party enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot responses showed mean values of 2.61 +/- 3.0 in the CAN group, with ratios of 0.50 to 0.72 +/- 0.42 in control subjects (P < 0.001), confirming that direct, donor-specific cellular immunity predominated in patients with CAN. Fifty percent of CAN patients studied exhibited donor peptide reactivity compared with only 28.6% in control subjects. Finally, 33% of patients in the CAN group developed new posttransplantation anti-HLA antibodies compared with only 4% in the control group (P < 0.05). Overall, the results suggest that persistent cell-mediated and humoral alloimmunity contribute to the development of CAN and further demonstrate that anti-donor immunity in patients with CAN is heterogeneous. Immune monitoring to predict long-term outcome should include multiple measures of cellular and humoral immunity.