Topical coapplication of hyaluronan with transdermal drug delivery enhancers attenuates inflammatory and neuropathic pain

ABSTRACT

We have previously shown that intradermal injection of high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (500-1200 kDa) produces localized antihyperalgesia in preclinical models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In the present experiments, we studied the therapeutic effect of topical hyaluronan, when combined with each of 3 transdermal drug delivery enhancers (dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO], protamine or terpene), in preclinical models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Topical application of 500 to 1200 kDa hyaluronan (the molecular weight range used in our previous studies employing intradermal administration), dissolved in 75% DMSO in saline, markedly reduced prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) hyperalgesia, in male and female rats. Although topical 500- to 1200-kDa hyaluronan in DMSO vehicle dose dependently, also markedly, attenuated oxaliplatin chemotherapy-and paclitaxel chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in male rats, it lacked efficacy in female rats. However, following ovariectomy or intrathecal administration of an oligodeoxynucleotide antisense to G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPR30) mRNA, CIPN in female rats was now attenuated by topical hyaluronan. Although topical coadministration of 150 to 300, 300 to 500, or 1500 to 1750 kDa hyaluronan with DMSO also attenuated CIPN, a slightly lower-molecular-weight hyaluronan (70-120 kDa) did not. The topical administration of a combination of hyaluronan with 2 other transdermal drug delivery enhancers, protamine and terpene, also attenuated CIPN hyperalgesia, an effect that was more prolonged than with DMSO vehicle. Repeated administration of topical hyaluronan prolonged the duration of antihyperalgesia. Our results support the use of topical hyaluronan, combined with chemically diverse nontoxic skin penetration enhancers, to induce marked antihyperalgesia in preclinical models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Higher Levels of Stress Are Associated With the Co-occurrence of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Anxiety

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) AND anxiety profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as levels of global stress, cancer-specific stress, cumulative life stress, and resilience.

DATA SOURCES

Patients (n = 1332) completed the Attentional Function Index and the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress and resilience were evaluated using Perceived Stress Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Life Stressor Checklist-Revised, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, respectively. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint CRCI AND anxiety profiles. Differences were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Three classes were identified (ie, No CRCI and Low Anxiety [57.3%], Moderate CRCI and Moderate Anxiety [34.5%], and High CRCI and High Anxiety [8.2%]). All of the stress measures showed a dose-response effect (ie, as the CRCI AND anxiety profile worsened, scores for all three types of stress increased). The two highest symptom classes reported higher occurrence rates for six specific stressors (eg, emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual harassment).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that higher levels of co-occurring CRCI AND anxiety are associated with some common risk factors, as well as higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience. Increased knowledge of modifiable risk factors and sources of stress associated with the co-occurrence of these two symptoms will assist clinicians to identify high-risk patients and implement individualized interventions.

Decrements in Both Physical and Cognitive Function Are Associated With a Higher Symptom Burden in Oncology Patients

OBJECTIVES

Physical and cognitive function are two of the most important patient-reported outcomes. In oncology patients receiving chemotherapy (N = 1331), purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint physical and cognitive function profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, severity of common symptoms, and quality of life outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Measures of physical and cognitive functions were obtained six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were done prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was done to identify the distinct joint physical and cognitive function profiles. Differences among the profiles were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

CONCLUSION

Five distinct profiles were identified (ie, Very Low Physical and Low Cognitive Function [18.4%; Both Low], Low Physical and High Cognitive Function [19.8%], Moderate Physical and Low Cognitive Function [26.7%], Changing Physical and Cognitive Function [5.4%], and Normal Physical and Cognitive Function [29.7%]). Patients in the Both Low class had the highest symptom burden and the poorest quality of life. Over 70% of the sample had moderate to severe decrements in one or both of these extremely important patient outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Clinicians need to assess for both physical and cognitive function using simple subjective and objective measures.

Anxiety in oncology outpatients is associated with perturbations in pathways identified in anxiety focused network pharmacology research

PURPOSE

Evaluate for perturbed signaling pathways associated with subgroups of patients with low versus high levels of state anxiety. These pathways were compared to the pathways identified across eight network pharmacology studies of the anxiolytic effect(s) of a variety of compounds.

METHODS

Adult outpatients had a diagnosis of breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding four weeks; and were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct anxiety profiles based on Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory scores that were obtained six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Blood samples were processed using RNA sequencing (i.e., RNA-seq sample, n = 244) and microarray (i.e., microarray sample; n = 256) technologies. Pathway perturbations were assessed using pathway impact analysis. Fisher's combined probability method was used to combine test results using a false discovery rate of 0.01.

RESULTS

In the RNA-seq sample, 62.3% and 37.7% of the patients were in the low- and high-anxiety classes, respectively. In the microarray sample, 61.3% and 38.7% were in the low and high-anxiety classes, respectively. Forty-one perturbed signaling pathways were identified. Eight of these pathways were common to those identified in the network pharmacology studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings increase our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that underlie anxiety in patients receiving chemotherapy. This study provides initial insights into how anxiety in patients with cancer may share common mechanisms with anxiety in patients with other clinical conditions.

Oncology Outpatients With Worse Anxiety and Sleep Disturbance Profiles Are at Increased Risk for a Higher Symptom Burden and Poorer Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Anxiety and sleep disturbance are frequent symptoms during chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Purposes were to identify subgroups of oncology outpatients with distinct joint anxiety and sleep disturbance profiles, as well as evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, sleep disturbance characteristics, severity of common symptoms, and quality-of-life outcomes among these subgroups.

METHODS

Oncology outpatients (n = 1331) completed self-report measures of anxiety and sleep disturbance 6 times over 2 chemotherapy cycles. Latent profile analysis was done to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint anxiety and sleep disturbance profiles.

RESULTS

Three profiles were identified (ie, no anxiety and low sleep disturbance (59.7%), moderate anxiety and high sleep disturbance (32.5%), high anxiety and very high sleep disturbance (7.8%)). Compared with the no anxiety and low sleep disturbance class, the other 2 classes were younger; less likely to be married; had a lower annual household income; and had childcare responsibilities. Patients in the 2 worse profiles had problems with both sleep initiation and maintenance. These patients reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, trait and state anxiety, and evening fatigue, as well as lower levels of morning and evening energy, cognitive function, and poorer quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 40% of patients had moderate or high levels of anxiety and high or very high levels of sleep disturbance. Modifiable risk factors associated with these profiles may be used to develop targeted interventions for 1 or both symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians need to assess for the co-occurrence of anxiety and sleep disturbance.

Higher Lifetime Stress and Symptom Burden Contribute to the Occurrence of Shortness of Breath

OBJECTIVES

Among four classes of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles, evaluate for differences in levels of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as resilience; evaluate for differences in the occurrence rates for various stressful life events, and evaluate for differences in the severity of common co-occurring symptoms.

DATA SOURCES

Outpatients (N = 1338) completed questionnaires six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. The occurrence of shortness of breath was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles. Differences among the classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

CONCLUSION

Shortness of breath classes were labeled based on their distinct occurrence trajectories: None (70.5%), Decreasing (8.2%), Increasing (7.8%), and High (13.5%). Compared to None class, Decreasing and High classes had higher global and cancer-specific stress scores. The High class reported higher occurrence rates for several adverse childhood experiences. Compared to None class, Decreasing and High classes had higher depression, anxiety, and morning fatigue scores and lower morning energy and cognitive function scores.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Given the additive or synergistic relationships between stress, co-occurring symptoms, and shortness of breath, multimodal interventions that include stress management, exercise training, and/or symptom management may decrease shortness of breath in oncology patients.

Risk Factors for a Higher Symptom Burden in Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate for subgroups of patients with distinct symptom profiles and differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and stress and resilience among these subgroups.

SAMPLE & SETTING

1,145 patients with cancer aged 18 years or older completed a survey online. Data were collected between May 2020 and February 2021.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Patients completed measures for depression, state anxiety, cognitive function, morning fatigue, evening fatigue, morning energy, evening energy, sleep disturbance, pain, stress, and resilience. Latent class profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct symptom profiles. Differences among the subgroups on study measures were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Four distinct profiles were identified (none, low, high, and very high). Patients in the high and very high classes reported clinically meaningful levels of all nine symptoms. Differences among the four profiles for stress and resilience exhibited a dose-response effect.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Findings can serve as benchmark data of the symptom burden of patients with cancer following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Associations Between Distinct State Anxiety Profiles, Exposure to Stressful Life Events, Resilience, and Coping in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers Receiving Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

In a sample of patients with gynecologic cancers who are receiving chemotherapy, subgroups of patients with distinct state anxiety profiles were identified, and differences among the subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics, stress, exposure to stressful life events, resilience, and coping behaviors were evaluated.

DATA SOURCES

Patients (n = 230) completed questionnaires six times over two chemotherapy cycles. State anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory. Subgroups of patients with distinct state anxiety profiles were identified using latent profile analysis. Differences among the classes were assessed using parametric and nonparametric tests.

CONCLUSION

Three distinct state anxiety profiles were identified: low (55.2%), moderate (38.3%), and very high (6.5%). Compared with the low class, persons in the other two classes had lower functional status, more comorbidities, higher perceived stress, and lower resilience and were more likely to report a history of depression and to use disengagement coping strategies. Compared with the low class, the very high class was more likely to report childcare responsibilities; have a history of lung disease, stomach disease, or low back pain; have experienced physical neglect, serious money problems, a serious disaster, or foster care; or were a caregiver for someone with a severe disability.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nearly 45% of patients reported clinically meaningful levels of state anxiety that persisted over two cycles of chemotherapy. Experiences with a variety of stressors may be risk factors for higher levels of anxiety during chemotherapy. Clinicians need to perform comprehensive social histories and assess for anxiety in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Neurotransmitter Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Symptom Clusters in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Purpose was to evaluate for associations between the severity of three distinct symptom clusters (ie, sickness-behavior, mood-cognitive, treatment-related) and polymorphisms for 16 genes involved in catecholaminergic, GABAergic, and serotonergic neurotransmission.

DATA SOURCES

Patients with breast and prostate cancer (n = 157) completed study questionnaires at the completion of radiation therapy. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to assess the severity of 32 common symptoms. Three distinct symptom clusters were identified using exploratory factor analysis. Associations between the symptom cluster severity scores and neurotransmitter gene polymorphisms were evaluated using regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

Severity scores for the sickness-behavior symptom cluster were associated with polymorphisms for solute carrier family 6 (SLC6A) member 2 (SLC6A2), SLC6A3, SLC6A1, and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (HTR) 2A (HTR2A) genes. For the mood-cognitive symptom cluster, severity scores were associated with polymorphisms for adrenoreceptor alpha 1D, SLC6A2, SLC6A3, SLC6A1, HTR2A, and HTR3A. Severity scores for the treatment-related symptom cluster were associated with polymorphisms for SLC6A2, SLC6A3, catechol-o-methyltransferase, SLC6A1, HTR2A, SLC6A4, and tryptophan hydroxylase 2.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Findings suggest that polymorphisms for several neurotransmitter genes are involved in the severity of sickness-behavior, mood-cognitive, and treatment-related symptom clusters in oncology patients at the completion of radiation therapy. Four genes with various associated polymorphisms were common across the three distinct symptom clusters (ie, SLC6A2, SLC6A3, SLC6A1, HTR2A) which suggest that these clusters have common underlying mechanisms.

Identification of distinct symptom profiles in patients with gynecologic cancers using a pre-specified symptom cluster

PURPOSE

Pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression are four of the most common symptoms in patients with gynecologic cancer. The purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct co-occurring pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression profiles (i.e., pre-specified symptom cluster) in a sample of patients with gynecologic cancer receiving chemotherapy and assess for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the severity of other common symptoms and QOL outcomes among these subgroups.

METHODS

Patients completed symptom questionnaires prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients using the pre-specified symptom cluster. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate for differences between the subgroups.

RESULTS

In the sample of 233 patients, two distinct latent classes were identified (i.e., low (64.8%) and high (35.2%)) indicating lower and higher levels of symptom burden. Patients in high class were younger, had child care responsibilities, were unemployed, and had a lower annual income. In addition, these women had a higher body mass index, a higher comorbidity burden, and a lower functional status. Patients in the high class reported higher levels of anxiety, as well as lower levels of energy and cognitive function and poorer quality of life scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a number of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with membership in the high class. Clinicians can use this information to refer patients to dieticians and physical therapists for tailored interventions.

Distinct Cognitive Function Profiles Are Associated With a Higher Presurgery Symptom Burden in Patients With Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common symptom in patients with breast cancer. In our previous study of 397 women with breast cancer, we identified 3 groups of patients with distinct CRCI profiles (ie, high, moderate, and low-moderate attentional function). Compared with the other 2 classes, the low-moderate class was younger, had more comorbidities, and with lower functional status.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we expand on this work and evaluate for differences among these latent classes in the severity of psychological (depression and anxiety) and physical (fatigue, decrements in energy, sleep disturbance, and pain) symptoms before surgery.

METHODS

Cancer-related cognitive impairment was assessed using the Attentional Functional Index from before through 6 months after surgery. Lower Attentional Functional Index scores indicate higher levels of CRCI. Psychological and physical symptoms were assessed with valid instruments. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate for differences in symptom severity scores among the latent classes.

RESULTS

Approximately 60% of patients experienced CRCI (ie, moderate and low-moderate classes). Significant differences were found among the 3 classes in the severity of trait and state anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and sleep disturbance (ie, high < moderate < low-moderate). In addition, compared with the other 2 classes, the low-moderate class reported higher pain interference scores.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that women with clinically meaningful levels of persistent CRCI have a relatively high symptom burden before surgery.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians need to routinely perform preoperative assessments of CRCI and associated symptoms and initiate therapeutic interventions.

An Evaluation of the Multifactorial Model of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND

Up to 45% of patients report cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). A variety of characteristics are associated with the occurrence and/or severity of CRCI. However, an important gap in knowledge of risk factors for CRCI is the relative contribution of each factor. The multifactorial model of cancer-related cognitive impairment (MMCRCI) is a conceptual model of CRCI that can be used to evaluate the strength of relationships between various factors and CRCI.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to use structural regression methods to evaluate the MMCRCI using data from a large sample of outpatients receiving chemotherapy ( n = 1,343). Specifically, the relationships between self-reported CRCI and four MMCRCI concepts (i.e., social determinants of health, patient-specific factors, treatment factors, and co-occurring symptoms) were examined. The goals were to determine how well the four concepts predicted CRCI and determine the relative contribution of each concept to deficits in perceived cognitive function.

METHODS

This study is part of a larger, longitudinal study that evaluated the symptom experience of oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Adult patients were diagnosed with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding 4 weeks; were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy; were able to read, write, and understand English; and gave written informed consent. Self-reported CRCI was assessed using the attentional function index. Available study data were used to define the latent variables.

RESULTS

On average, patients were 57 years of age, college educated, and with a mean Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80. Of the four concepts evaluated, whereas co-occurring symptoms explained the largest amount of variance in CRCI, treatment factors explained the smallest amount of variance. A simultaneous structural regression model that estimated the joint effect of the four exogenous latent variables on the CRCI latent variable was not significant.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that testing individual components of the MMCRCI may provide useful information on the relationships among various risk factors, as well as refinements of the model. In terms of risk factors for CRCI, co-occurring symptoms may be more significant than treatment factors, patient-specific factors, and/or social determinants of health in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Distinct Profiles of Morning and Evening Fatigue Co-Occurrence in Patients During Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Morning and evening fatigue are distinct and distressing symptoms experienced during chemotherapy that demonstrate a large amount of interindividual variability.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning and evening fatigue co-occurrence profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics and quality of life.

METHODS

Oncology patients ( n = 1,334) completed the Lee Fatigue Scale to self-report morning and evening fatigue, six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning and evening physical fatigue profiles.

RESULTS

Four distinct morning and evening fatigue profiles were identified (i.e., Both Low, Low Morning + Moderate Evening, Both Moderate, and Both High). Compared to the Both Low profile, the Both High profile was significantly younger, less likely to be married or partnered, more likely to live alone, had a higher comorbidity burden, and lower functional status. The Both High profile had higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, and pain and lower levels of quality of life.

DISCUSSION

The variability in the morning and evening severity scores among the four profiles supports the hypothesis that morning and evening fatigue are distinct but related symptoms. Clinically meaningful levels of both morning and evening fatigue were reported by 50.4% of our sample, which suggests that the co-occurrence of these two symptoms is relatively common. Patients in Both Moderate and Both High profiles experienced an extremely high symptom burden that warrants ongoing assessments and aggressive symptom management interventions.

Higher Levels of Stress and Neuropsychological Symptoms Are Associated With a High Nausea Profile in Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate differences in the severity of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, resilience, and common neuropsychological symptoms among four subgroups of patients with distinct chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) profiles.

SAMPLE & SETTING

Adult patients with cancer (N = 1,343) receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Patients completed stress, resilience, and neuropsychological symptom severity measures. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to assess CIN occurrence six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used to evaluate differences among subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles.

RESULTS

The high class had significantly higher levels of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress; significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, morning and evening fatigue, and pain; and lower levels of morning and evening energy and cognitive dysfunction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Clinicians need to evaluate CIN occurrence across each cycle of chemotherapy and assess patients for various types of stress and common neuropsychological symptoms.

Sleep disturbance and decrements in morning energy contribute to a higher symptom burden in oncology patients

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

An emerging area of research is the relationship between sleep disturbance and decrements in energy. Given the paucity of research on the co-occurrence of these two symptoms, study purposes were to identify subgroups of oncology patients with distinct joint sleep disturbance AND morning energy profiles and evaluate for differences among the subgroups in demographic, clinical, and sleep disturbance characteristics, as well as the severity of other common symptoms and QOL outcomes.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients (n = 1336) completed measures of sleep disturbance and energy 6 times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed at enrollment. Latent profile analysis was used to identify the distinct joint sleep disturbance and morning energy profiles.

RESULTS

Three distinct profiles were identified (i.e., Low Sleep Disturbance and High Morning Energy (Normal, 20.6%), Moderate Sleep Disturbance and Low Morning Energy (Moderately Severe, 52.1%), Very High Sleep Disturbance and Very Low Morning Energy (Very Severe, 27.3%). Compared to Normal class, other two classes were more likely to be female, less likely to be employed, and had higher comorbidity burden and poorer functional status. Symptom scores and QOL outcomes exhibited a dose response effect (i.e., as the profile worsened, symptom scores increased and QOL scores decreased).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the associations between sleep disturbance and decrements in energy and a higher symptom burden, poorer QOL outcomes, and increased mortality, assessment of these two symptoms needs to be a high priority for clinicians and appropriate interventions initiated.

Neuroendocrine mechanisms in oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesic priming

ABSTRACT

Stress plays a major role in the symptom burden of oncology patients and can exacerbate cancer chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a major adverse effect of many classes of chemotherapy. We explored the role of stress in the persistent phase of the pain induced by oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin induced hyperalgesic priming, a model of the transition to chronic pain, as indicated by prolongation of hyperalgesia produced by prostaglandin E 2 , in male rats, which was markedly attenuated in adrenalectomized rats. A neonatal handling protocol that induces stress resilience in adult rats prevented oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesic priming. To elucidate the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and sympathoadrenal neuroendocrine stress axes in oxaliplatin CIPN, we used intrathecally administered antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) directed against mRNA for receptors mediating the effects of catecholamines and glucocorticoids, and their second messengers, to reduce their expression in nociceptors. Although oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesic priming was attenuated by intrathecal administration of β 2 -adrenergic and glucocorticoid receptor antisense ODNs, oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesia was only attenuated by β 2 -adrenergic receptor antisense. Administration of pertussis toxin, a nonselective inhibitor of Gα i/o proteins, attenuated hyperalgesic priming. Antisense ODNs for Gα i 1 and Gα o also attenuated hyperalgesic priming. Furthermore, antisense for protein kinase C epsilon, a second messenger involved in type I hyperalgesic priming, also attenuated oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesic priming. Inhibitors of second messengers involved in the maintenance of type I (cordycepin) and type II (SSU6656 and U0126) hyperalgesic priming both attenuated hyperalgesic priming. These experiments support a role for neuroendocrine stress axes in hyperalgesic priming, in male rats with oxaliplatin CIPN.

Patients with palpitations experience a higher symptom burden prior to breast cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and pain are common symptoms reported by patients with breast cancer. Recent evidence suggests that palpitations, a feeling of the heart racing or pounding, may be equally common. Study purpose was to compare the severity and clinically meaningful occurrence rates of common symptoms and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between patients with breast cancer who did and did not report palpitations prior to surgery.

METHODS

Patients (n = 398) were classified as having or not having palpitations using a single item from the Menopausal Symptoms Scale. Valid and reliable measures were used to assess state and trait anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue, energy, cognitive function, breast symptoms, and QOL. Between group differences were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

Patients with palpitations (15.1%) reported significantly higher severity scores for state and trait anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and fatigue as well as significant decrements in energy and cognitive function (all p < .05). A higher percentage of these patients had clinically meaningful levels of state anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and decrements in cognitive function (all p < .05). Except for spiritual well-being, QOL scores were lower in the palpitations group (all p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Findings support the need for routine assessment of palpitations and management of multiple symptoms in women prior to breast cancer surgery.

Epigenetic Regulation of Inflammatory Mechanisms and a Psychological Symptom Cluster in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

A psychological symptom cluster is the most common cluster identified in oncology patients. Although inflammatory mechanisms are hypothesized to underlie this cluster, epigenetic contributions are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study's purpose was to evaluate associations between the occurrence of a psychological symptom cluster and levels of DNA methylation for inflammatory genes in a heterogeneous sample of patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

Prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy, 1,071 patients reported the occurrence of 38 symptoms using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. A psychological cluster was identified using exploratory factor analysis. Differential methylation analyses were performed in two independent samples using Illumina Infinium 450K and EPIC microarrays. Expression-associated CpG (eCpG) loci in the promoter region of 114 inflammatory genes on the 450K and 112 genes on the EPIC microarray were evaluated for associations with the psychological cluster. Robust rank aggregation was used to identify differentially methylated genes across both samples. Significance was assessed using a false discovery rate of 0.05 under the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

RESULTS

Cluster of differentiation 40 ( CD40 ) was differentially methylated across both samples. All six promoter eCpGs for CD40 that were identified across both samples were hypomethylated in the psychological cluster group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to suggest associations between a psychological symptom cluster and differential DNA methylation of a gene involved in tissue inflammation and cell-mediated immunity. Our findings suggest that increased CD40 expression through hypomethylation of promoter eCpG loci is involved in the occurrence of a psychological symptom cluster in patients receiving chemotherapy. These findings suggest a direction for mechanistic studies.

Distinct Worst Pain Profiles in Oncology Outpatients Undergoing Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

While pain is a significant problem for oncology patients, little is known about interindividual variability in pain characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct worst pain severity profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics and stress and symptom scores.

METHODS

Patients (n = 934) completed questionnaires 6 times over 2 chemotherapy cycles. Worst pain intensity was assessed using a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess various pain characteristics. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct pain profiles.

RESULTS

Three worst pain profiles were identified (low [17.5%], moderate [39.9%], severe [42.6%]). Compared with the other 2 classes, severe class was more likely to be single and unemployed and had a lower annual household income, a higher body mass index, a higher level of comorbidity, and a poorer functional status. Severe class was more likely to have both cancer and noncancer pain, a higher number of pain locations, higher frequency and duration of pain, worse pain quality scores, and higher pain interference scores. Compared with the other 2 classes, severe class reported lower satisfaction with pain management and higher global, disease-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as higher anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Unrelieved pain is a significant problem for more than 80% of outpatients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians need to perform comprehensive pain assessments; prescribe pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions; and initiate referrals for pain management and psychological services.

A Pilot Study of Associations Between the Occurrence of Palpitations and Cytokine Gene Variations in Women Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Palpitations are common and have a negative impact on women's quality of life. While evidence suggests that inflammatory mechanisms may play a role in the development of palpitations, no studies have evaluated for this association in patients with breast cancer who report palpitations prior to surgery. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate for associations between the occurrence of palpitations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes for pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, their receptors, and transcriptional regulators.

METHODS

Patients were recruited prior to surgery and completed a self-report questionnaire on the occurrence of palpitations. Genotyping of SNPs in cytokine genes was performed using a custom array. Multiple logistic regression analyses were done to identify associations between the occurrence of palpitations and SNPs in fifteen candidate genes.

RESULTS

Of the 82 SNPs evaluated in the bivariate analyses, eleven SNPs in 6 genes were associated with the occurrence of palpitations. After controlling for functional status, the occurrence of back pain, and self-reported and genomic estimates of race/ethnicity, 3 SNPs in 3 different genes (i.e., interleukin (IL) 1-beta (IL1B) rs1143643, IL10 rs3024505, IL13 rs1295686) were associated with the occurrence of palpitations prior to surgery (all p ≤ .038).

CONCLUSIONS

While these preliminary findings warrant replication, they suggest that inflammatory mechanisms may contribute to the subjective sensation of palpitations in women prior to breast cancer surgery.

Higher Stress in Oncology Patients is Associated With Cognitive and Evening Physical Fatigue Severity

CONTEXT

Cognitive and physical fatigue are common symptoms experienced by oncology patients. Exposure to stressful life events (SLE), cancer-related stressors, coping styles, and levels of resilience may influence the severity of both dimensions of fatigue.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate for differences in global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as resilience and coping in oncology patients (n=1332) with distinct cognitive fatigue AND evening physical fatigue profiles.

METHODS

Latent profile analysis, which combined the two symptom scores, identified three subgroups of patients with distinct cognitive fatigue AND evening physical fatigue profiles (i.e., Low, Moderate, High). Patients completed measures of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress as well measures of resilience and coping. Differences among the latent classes in the various measures were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Compared to Low class, the other two classes reported higher global and cancer-specific stress. In addition, they reported higher occurrence rates for sexual harassment and being forced to touch prior to 16 years of age. Compared to the other two classes, High class reported lower resilience scores and higher use of denial, substance use, and behavioral disengagement.

CONCLUSION

To decrease both cognitive and evening physical fatigue, clinicians need to assess for relevant stressors and initiate interventions to increase resilience and the use of engagement coping strategies. Additional research is warranted on the relative contribution of various social determinants of health to both cognitive and physical fatigue in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy.

Distinct Nausea Profiles Are Associated With Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Unrelieved chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) occurs 48% of patients undergoing chemotherapy and is one of the most debilitating symptoms that patients report.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles and determine how these subgroups differed on demographic and clinical characteristics; severity, frequency, and distress of CIN; and the co-occurrence of common gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1343) completed demographic questionnaire and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles. Differences among these subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Four distinct CIN profiles were identified: none (40.8%), increasing-decreasing (21.5%), decreasing (8.9%), and high (28.8%). Compared with the none class, patients in the high class were younger, had a lower annual household income, had child care responsibilities, had a lower Karnofsky Performance Status score and a higher Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire score, and were more likely to have received chemotherapy on a 14-day cycle and a highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimen. In addition, patients in the high class reported high occurrence rates for dry mouth, feeling bloated, diarrhea, lack of appetite, abdominal cramps, difficulty swallowing, mouth sores, weight loss, and change in the way food tastes.

CONCLUSIONS

That 60% of the patients reported moderate to high CIN occurrence rates confirms that this unrelieved symptom is a significant clinical problem.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses need to evaluate patients' level of adherence to their antiemetic regimen and make appropriate referrals for physical therapy, psychological services, and dietary counseling.

Distinct Shortness of Breath Profiles in Oncology Outpatients Undergoing Chemotherapy

CONTEXT

Shortness of breath is a distressing symptom that occurs in 10% to 70% of oncology patients. Despite this broad range in its occurrence, little is known about inter-individual variability in shortness of breath and associated risk factors among patients receiving chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles; evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics; evaluate for differences among symptom dimensions of shortness of breath, and evaluate for differences in quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

Outpatients (n=1338) completed questionnaires six times over two chemotherapy cycles. Occurrence of shortness of breath was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles.

RESULTS

Four distinct shortness of breath profiles were identified (None [70.5%], Decreasing [8.2%], Increasing [7.8%], High [13.5%]). Risk factors for membership in High class included: history of smoking, self-reported diagnosis of lung disease, having lung cancer, and receipt of a higher number of cancer treatments. Compared to the None class, High class reported poorer physical, psychological, and social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 14% of patients with heterogeneous types of cancer receiving chemotherapy had persistently high occurrence rates of shortness of breath for almost two months. In addition, compared to the Decreasing and Increasing classes, the High class' episodes of shortness of breath were more frequent and more severe. Clinicians need to assess all oncology patients for shortness of breath and provide targeted interventions.

Palpitations and Co-Occurring Menopausal Symptoms in Women Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the occurrence rate of palpitations in women prior to breast cancer surgery and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and menopausal symptoms in patients with and without palpitations.

SAMPLE & SETTING

Presurgery data on palpitations and menopausal symptoms from 398 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery were analyzed.

METHODS & VARIABLES

The Menopausal Symptoms Scale was used to evaluate the occurrence, severity, and distress of 46 symptoms, including palpitations. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate for differences between patients with and without palpitations.

RESULTS

Women with palpitations had lower annual income, lower functional status, higher comorbidity burden, and higher rates of back pain than women without palpitations. Women with palpitations had twice the number of menopausal symptoms and had higher occurrence rates for 39 of the 45 menopausal symptoms. They reported significantly higher severity scores for difficulty concentrating, dizziness, swollen hands/feet, and wake during the night, and higher distress scores for anxiety, hot flashes, swollen hands/feet, and wake during the night.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Clinicians should perform routine assessments of palpitations and make appropriate referrals to a cardiologist.

Associations among hearing loss, multiple co-occurring symptoms, and quality of life outcomes in cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, occurrence of common symptoms, symptom severity scores, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in survivors with (n = 155) and without (n = 118) audiometrically confirmed hearing loss.

METHODS

Survivors, who were recruited from throughout the San Francisco Bay area, completed the self-report questionnaires to obtain the information of demographic and clinical characteristics; the occurrence and severity of depression, anxiety, fatigue, decrements in energy, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive impairment; and the general and cancer-specific QOL outcomes. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to evaluate for differences between the two survivor groups.

RESULTS

Survivors with audiometrically confirmed hearing loss were older, more likely to be male, were more likely to be unemployed, report a lower annual household income, and had a higher comorbidity burden. Except for the severity of worst pain, no between-group differences were found in the occurrence rates for or severity of any of the symptoms. Survivors with hearing loss reported worse physical function and general health scores.

CONCLUSIONS

While no between-group differences in symptom occurrence rates and severity scores were found, across the total sample, a relatively high percentage of survivors who were over 6 years from their cancer diagnosis reported clinically meaningful levels of depression (25%), anxiety (50%), fatigue (40%), decrements in energy (70%), sleep disturbance (58%), cognitive impairment (57%), and pain (60%).

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Clinicians need to perform routine assessments of hearing loss, as well as common co-occurring symptoms and initiate individualized symptom management interventions.