The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration: analysis of individual data on lipid, inflammatory and other markers in over 1.1 million participants in 104 prospective studies of cardiovascular diseases

Many long-term prospective studies have reported on associations of cardiovascular diseases with circulating lipid markers and/or inflammatory markers. Studies have not, however, generally been designed to provide reliable estimates under different circumstances and to correct for within-person variability. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration has established a central database on over 1.1 million participants from 104 prospective population-based studies, in which subsets have information on lipid and inflammatory markers, other characteristics, as well as major cardiovascular morbidity and cause-specific mortality. Information on repeat measurements on relevant characteristics has been collected in approximately 340,000 participants to enable estimation of and correction for within-person variability. Re-analysis of individual data will yield up to approximately 69,000 incident fatal or nonfatal first ever major cardiovascular outcomes recorded during about 11.7 million person years at risk. The primary analyses will involve age-specific regression models in people without known baseline cardiovascular disease in relation to fatal or nonfatal first ever coronary heart disease outcomes. This initiative will characterize more precisely and in greater detail than has previously been possible the shape and strength of the age- and sex-specific associations of several lipid and inflammatory markers with incident coronary heart disease outcomes (and, secondarily, with other incident cardiovascular outcomes) under a wide range of circumstances. It will, therefore, help to determine to what extent such associations are independent from possible confounding factors and to what extent such markers (separately and in combination) provide incremental predictive value.

Irinotecan, Carboplatin, and Imatinib in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

INTRODUCTION

The tyrosine kinase KIT has variable expression in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and may be a prognostic factor. Imatinib targets KIT expression, providing rationale for studying its role in combination with chemotherapy in SCLC in a multicenter phase II trial.

METHODS

Patients with untreated extensive-stage SCLC received carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 4 on day 1; irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; and imatinib 600 mg/day. Treatment cycles were 28 days. Patients remained on imatinib until progressive disease or significant toxicity.

RESULTS

Between September 2002 and May 2004, 68 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial. Median age was 60 years (range, 37-81). The objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval: 54%-76%). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.0 months). Median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5 months). Thirty-five percent of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (43%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included diarrhea (19%), fatigue (24%), and nausea (26%). Forty-eight of 56 patients (86%) with available tumor specimens had KIT expression detected. KIT expression did not appear to correlate with progression-free survival or overall survival in a retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan, carboplatin, and imatinib is a safe and generally well-tolerated regimen in patients with SCLC. However, the addition of imatinib did not improve results from those expected with chemotherapy alone.

Weekly docetaxel and bortezomib as first-line treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is currently the standard first-line treatment in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Bortezomib, the first proteasome inhibitor in clinical use, demonstrated activity against prostate cancer in phase I trials. For this reason, we evaluated the efficacy of docetaxel plus bortezomib in the first-line treatment of patients with HRPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2004 and May 2005, 63 eligible patients entered this phase II trial. All patients had metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate that had progressed on hormonal therapy. All patients received docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated after 8 weeks of treatment; responding and stable patients continued treatment until tumor progression.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (95%) received > or = 2 courses of treatment and were evaluable for response. Fifteen patients (25%; 95% confidence interval, 15%-38%) had a > 50% decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen level with treatment; the median response duration was 8 months. The median progression-free and overall survival times for the entire group were 4.1 months and 13.8 months, respectively; 20% of patients were alive at 2 years. The regimen was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3/4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with this combination of weekly docetaxel and bortezomib showed no suggestion of improved efficacy versus previous results with docetaxel alone. Bortezomib has minimal activity in patients with HRPC and is unlikely to make any impact on treatment efficacy.

Preliminary results of a multicenter phase II trial of vinflunine (with trastuzumab in HER2+ pts) as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer

1043

Background: Vinflunine (VFL) is a new and innovative microtubule inhibitor of the vinca alkaloid class that achieves high intracellular concentrations. By inhibition of tubulin polymerization, cell proliferation is arrested leading to apoptotic death. Demonstrating anti- angiogenic and vascular disrupting activities, VFL has demonstrated significant efficacy as 2nd line chemotherapy in MBC (M. Campone, BJC 2006). This trial was designed to evaluate the response rate and safety of VFL as 1st line therapy in MBC as well as its activity in combination with trastuzumab in HER2+ MBC pts. Methods: Eligibility: 0 prior regimens for MBC, > 6 mo from adjuvant therapy, RECIST measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–2, adequate organ function, < G2 neuropathy. Treatment: 320 mg/m2 IV over 20 minutes q3 weeks; 280 mg/m2 with trastuzumab 6 mg/kg q3 weeks in HER2+ pts. Response evaluations q9 weeks; treatment continued until progression or toxicity. A total of 96 pts will be enrolled, 48 pts per each of 2 cohorts, HER2- and HER2+. Results: 18 pts are enrolled, 13 pts evaluable for toxicity and 12 pts for response. 3 pts received VFL monotherapy and 10 pts were treated with VFL + trastuzumab. Median age: 59 years (43–78). ECOG PS 0: 9 pts, 1: 3 pts, 2: 1 pt. Prior adjuvant chemo: 7 pts (54%), with 5 prior anthracyclines and 6 prior taxanes. 2 pts received adjuvant hormonal therapy only. 4 pts presented with de novo stage IV HER2+ MBC. Metastatic disease sites: liver: 6 pts, lung: 7 pts, bone: 5 pts, lymph nodes: 6 pts. 46% had 3 or more sites of organ involvement. Median of 3 cycles (range:1 - 11) was delivered. 7 pts (58%, all HER2+) had a PR and 4 pts (33%) achieved SD. Only 1 pt progressed. Heme toxicity: G3/4 neutropenia: 2 pts (16%); no febrile neutropenia was noted. G3 non-heme toxicity consisted of N/V: 2 pts and myalgia, 2 pts. There were no G4 events. 4 pts were hospitalized (vomiting: 2, cerebro-vascular accident: 1, back pain: 1 pt). 92% of pts remain free of progression at 6 months. Median TTP has not been reached. Conclusions: Vinflunine is a promising new drug with a high level of activity as first line MBC therapy, especially in combination with trastuzumab. VFL is well tolerated in this patient population with a manageable toxicity profile. Accrual to this trial continues.

[Table: see text]

Biweekly neoadjuvant gemcitabine, epirubicin, and nano-particle albumin bound (nab) paclitaxel (GEA) with tumor SPARC analysis correlated with pathologic responses: Results of a multicenter phase II trial

11060

Background: The triplet combination of gemcitabine (G), anthracyclines and taxanes have demonstrated significant activity in the metastatic as well as neoadjuvant breast cancer setting with objective response rates of 90% and pathologic CRs of 20–25% with a variety of schedules. SPARC, a poor prognostic indicator, is a glycoprotein expressed in many solid tumors, including breast cancer, and is thought to mediate active tumor transport of nab paclitaxel resulting in high intratumoral concentrations. The present tumor analysis correlates SPARC expression with pathologic responses to neoadjuvant GEA. Methods: Patients with clinical T1c-T4d and/or N0–3, M0 (T1N0M0 excluded) breast cancer, chemo naive, ECOG PS 0–2, normal LVEF, adequate organ function were treated with neoadjuvant G 2000 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, nab paclitaxel (A)175 mg/m2 IV q14 x 6 cycles followed by surgery. Postoperative therapy: G 2000 mg/m2 and A 220 mg/m2 q14 x 4 cycles. Neulasta 6 mg sc D2 was given with all cycles although alternative granulocyte stimulating factors was permitted. Enrollment planned for 120 pts. Results: 72 pts are enrolled, 48 patients evaluable for toxicityand pathologic responses available for 35 pts. Median age: 48 years (29–73), ECOG PS 0 - 45 pts (96%), 1 - 3 (6%), median tumor size 4.5 cm, 79% ductal, 4% lobular, 13% inflammatory. 54% ER-/PR-, 81% HER2 negative. 21 (60%) were triple negative, basal subtype. Heme toxicity was minimal: G3/4 neutropenia: 4 (8%) pts, thrombocytopenia: 3 (6%) pts. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonheme toxicity significant for G3/4 arthraglias: 5 (10%) pts & fatigue in 3 (6%) pts. 3 pts hospitalized (infection, PE, abd pain). 1 pt developed PD during neoadjuvant therapy; 5 pts did not complete post op chemo (pt compliance: 2, PD: 2, MD discretion: 1). pCR was noted in both breast and LNs in 7 pts (20%) and pPR in 26 (74%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant dose dense GEA is feasible and extremely well tolerated. Significant activity with a pCR of 20% is evident with the basal subtype of breast cancer. SPARC tumor analysis correlations with observed pathologic responses will be presented and updated with the continuing accrual to this trial.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Importance of timing of PET scan after therapy in oncology

13014

Background: Growth factors are routine after systemic chemotherapy both as primary and secondary prophylaxis. Similarly PET scan is increasingly used for initial staging and follow-up of response. Timing of both is important since false positive results are noted due to high sensitivity of the test. Methods: Records of four patients with super positive PET scan with diffuse uptake in the axial skeleton were analyzed for the timing of administration of white cell growth factor before imaging and confirmation of bone finding with a follow- up bone scan to rule out mets. Results: Two patients were treated for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer, one patient with breast cancer was receiving adjuvant treatment for stage IIIA breast cancer, and the last patient was treated for metastatic pancreatic cancer. All had negative scans for bone mets before the start of treatment. PET scan was done for staging in one patient and evaluation of abnormal CT scan in another, and follow-up of response in two patients. It was inadvertently obtained 10–14 days after the filgrastim/pefilgrastim administration. Based on the unusual uptake in bony skeleton, bone scan was ordered to rule out bone mets in all four patients. Since their bone scans were negative for metastatic disease they were continued on their treatment plan as scheduled. Conclusions: PET scan has been sparingly used until 1990’s due to high cost. Currently Medicare has approved it for wider indications. PET scan in general has high sensitivity and low specificity and false positive results are more common from metabolically active infection and inflammation. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor used with cancer treatments can increase the FDG uptake in PET scan. Diffuse increased uptake in bone marrow by PET scan can be seen in reactive marrow following growth factor therapy. Usually FDG uptake is modest with SUV of less than 3, uniform and diffuse if due to growth factor stimulation in contrast to greater intensity with SUV around 6 with non uniform distribution. Awareness of this pitfalls associated with PET scan allows image interpretation accurately. PET-CT fusion may increase the diagnostic specificity. However timing of the scan in relation to growth factor administration may also help to avoid the unnecessary anxiety and further follow up testing which adds to the health care costs.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cost-effectiveness of referral for generic care or problem-solving treatment from community mental health nurses, compared with usual general practitioner care for common mental disorders: Randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

UK general practitioners (GPs) refer patients with common mental disorders to community mental health nurses.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this practice.

METHOD

Randomised trial with three arms: usual GP care, generic mental health nurse care, and care from nurses trained in problem-solving treatment; 98 GPs in 62 practices referred 247 adult patients with new episodes of anxiety, depression and life difficulties, to 37 nurses.

RESULTS

There were 212 (86%) and 190 (77%) patients followed up at 8 and 26 weeks respectively. No significant differences between groups were found in effectiveness at either point. Mean differences in Clinical Interview Schedule - Revised scores at 26 weeks compared with GP care were -1.4 (95% CI -5.5 to 2.8) for generic nurse care, and 1.1 (-2.9 to 5.1) for nurse problem-solving. Satisfaction was significantly higher in both nurse-treated groups. Mean extra costs per patient were 283 pound (95% CI154-411) for generic nurse care, and 315 pound (183-481) for nurse problem-solving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs should not refer unselected patients with common mental disorders to specialist nurses. Problem-solving should be reserved for patients who have not responded to initial GP care.

A phase II trial of biweekly pemetrexed (P) and gemcitabine (G) in the first-line treatment (tx) of patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

17054

Background: P and G are active and well-tolerated non-platinum agents used in the tx of NSCLC. Previous trials have combined P and G in the first-line NSCLC setting using a 21D schedule. This trial examined the safety and activity of biweekly P/G. Methods: Theprimary endpoints of this single center community-based phase II study were toassess the safety and response rate (RR) of P/G in pts with previously untreated stage III (unresectable) or IV NSCLC. Tx included: P 500mg/m2 IV D1 and G 1500mg/m2 IV D1 Q 14D for 8–12 cycles. Pts also received folate and B12 prophylaxis. Pts were restagedafter 4 cycles. Eligibility included:measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–2, adequate organ function, informed consent, and no active brain metastases. Analysis was by intent to treat. Results: Thirty-five pts were enrolled between 5/05 and 8/05. The median follow-upis 6 months (3.5–7.5 months). Baseline characteristics include: medianage 65 years (41–85); male/female, 71%/29%; ECOG PS 0,1,2:17%/71%/12%; and histology, adenocarcinoma (34%), large cell (29%), squamous (11%), mixed or not specified (26%). The median number of cycles delivered was 8 (1–12). Grade (G)3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included:chest pain (6%), constipation (6%), fatigue (17%), hypercalcemia (6%), dyspnea (9%), and tachyarrhythmia (9%). G3/4 hematologic toxicity included: neutropenia(51%), anemia (8%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). G3/4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 14%. There were notx-related deaths. Response data are availablefor 35 pts. Complete/partial responses for all pts were observed in 0 pts/7pts, respectively, for an overall RR of 20% (95% CI 10%-36%, 1 pt unconfirmed by RECIST criteria). Fifty-four percentof pts had stable disease, and 14% had disease progression(4 pts were unevaluable.) Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) andoverall survival (OS) were 51% and 67%, respectively. Median PFS and OS have not been reached. Conclusions: Biweekly P/G is a safe and well-tolerated regimen with RRsimilar to other standard first-line regimens for the tx of pts with advanced NSCLC, and further study is warranted. Median and 1-year PFSand OS endpoints have not been reached in this trial.

[Table: see text]

Phase II pilot trial of imatinib mesylate with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer

10716

Background: Overexpression of platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) has been associated with breast cancer tumor progression and may serve as a potential target for therapy. Inhibition of PDGFR signaling in tumor stroma represents a novel strategy that has demonstrated enhanced chemotherapy antitumor effects, decreased tumor interstitial fluid pressure as well as increased tumor transcapillary transport. Imatinib mesylate (G) is a potent PDGFR tyrosine kinase antagonist. This phase II pilot study evaluates the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of imatinib administered with docetaxel as a strategy to enhance docetaxel’s chemotherapeutic effects in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Eligibility requirements: 0–1 prior regimens for MBC, > 6 months from prior adjuvant taxanes, RECIST measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–2, adequate organ function, < G2 neuropathy. Treatment: docetaxel 30 mg/m2 IV weekly 3 of 4 weeks. Imatinib mesylate 600 mg po QD. Pts were evaluated for response every 8 weeks; treatment continued until progression or toxicity. Results: 7 pts have been enrolled to date. Median age is 61, all with ECOG PS 0. 5 pts received prior adjuvant therapy; 2 pts received prior taxanes. 43% received prior hormonal therapy. Only 1 pt was ER+/PR+. Hematologic toxicity was mild, consisting only of G3/4 anemia in 2 pts and G3 thrombocytopenia in 1. No febrile neutropenia was noted. Nonhematologic toxicity was characterized primarily by G3 GI toxicity: 4 pts diarrhea, 3 N, V, 1 anorexia, 1 abdominal pain. This was attributed to imatinib in all but 1 pt, in whom both drugs were implicated. 2 pts were removed from treatment and 3 pts required dose reductions, all due to GI toxicity consisting of N, V, and diarrhea. 3 pts experienced dose interruptions and 2 pts exhibited disease progression. Conclusion: These early preliminary results demonstrate imatinib mesylate, in combination with weekly docetaxel as a strategy to inhibit breast cancer PDGFR signaling, is feasible. GI toxicity with this combination was prominent and warrants dose modifications. Updated toxicity and efficacy data will be presented.

[Table: see text]

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and carboplatin, plus trastuzumab in HER2+ patients as first line therapy in metastatic breast cancer

10590

Background: Gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C) demonstrate significant preclinical synergy together as well as in combination with trastuzumab (H) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts. This multicenter phase II trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of G + C with trastuzumab in HER2 + pts as 1st line therapy in MBC. Methods: Eligibility requirements: females > 18 with no prior regimens for MBC, ECOG 0–2, RECIST bidimensional disease, and adequate organ function. FISH HER2 + pts received H with GC. Treatment: G 1,000 mg/m2 D1& 8 with C AUC 5 D1 in the first 20 pts. Following a toxicity assessment revealing significant myelosuppression, C was administered in subsequent pts at AUC 4. 14 HER2+ pts received H 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg q21 days. Pts were evaluated for response after 9 weeks; treatment continued until progression or toxicity except in HER2+ pts who received up to 6 cycles GCH followed by single agent H. Results: Between 11/03 & 11/05, 45 pts have been treated: median age 55 for GC, 65 for GCH, ECOG 0/1 22/23. 19 pts were chemonaive. 26 pts received prior adjuvant chemotherapy: 20 pts adjuvant anthracyclines (A) & taxanes (T), 3 only prior A and 3 prior T. 73% had 2 or more metastatic sites of disease. 31 pts received GC & 14 pts received GCH. 18 of 41 evaluable pts (44%) had objective responses (PR 16, CR 2) with 17 pts (42%) exhibiting SD & 6 pts PD (15%). 91% of AT pretreated pts demonstrated SD or better. 9 remain on study. 6 went off study due to heme related toxicities and 9 due to MD discretion [4 max benefit, 3 XRT]. Median # of cycles was 5. Combined G3/4 hematologic toxicity was notable for 66% neutropenia (only 1 FN), 55% thrombocytopenia, and 32% anemia, predominately occurring at the carboplatin AUC 5 dose level. Transfusions of PRBCs and plts were administered in 14 and 8 pts respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal and remarkable for G3/4 fatigue in 20%. Conclusions: In FISH HER2+ pts, the addition of trastuzumab to GC yielded a 50% RR, with no evident cardiotoxicity. The combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin AUC 4 is active, albeit with moderate hematologic toxicity, warranting further exploration of alternate GC ± H schedules in breast cancer.

[Table: see text]

Ultrasonic treatment to improve anaerobic digestibility of dairy waste streams

The dairy-processing industry generates various types of organic wastes, which are utilised as stock feed, for anaerobic digestion, spread on land or alternatively land-filled at high costs. Owing to the generation of renewable energy, anaerobic digestion is an attractive option for many factories. To enhance the biological degradation process, a mechanical disintegration of various waste dairy streams was undertaken. While the successful application of ultrasonic treatment has been reported for various municipal waste streams, limited information was available for dairy industry applications. The results of this study showed that ultrasonic treatment can improve the digestibility of the more problematic dairy waste streams, such as sludges, by breaking down micro-organisms' cell walls and releasing soluble cell compounds. For more soluble streams, such as dairy factory effluent, an increased gas production was observed and attributed to the reduced particle size of the fat globules.

A trial of problem-solving by community mental health nurses for anxiety, depression and life difficulties among general practice patients. The CPN-GP study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of community mental health nurse (CMHN) problem-solving and generic CMHN care, against usual general practitioner (GP) care in reducing symptoms, alleviating problems, and improving social functioning and quality of life for people living in the community with common mental disorders; and to undertake a cost comparison of each CMHN treatment compared with usual GP care.

DESIGN

A pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with three arms: CMHN problem-solving, generic CMHN care and usual GP care.

SETTING

General practices in two southern English counties were included in the study. CMHNs were employed by local NHS trusts providing community mental health services.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were GP patients aged 18--65 years with a new episode of anxiety, depression or reaction to life difficulties and had to score at least 3 points on the General Health Questionnaire-12 screening tool. Symptoms had to be present for a minimum of 4 weeks but no longer than 6 months.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to one of three groups: (1) CMHN problem-solving treatment, (2) generic CMHN treatment, or (3) usual GP care. All three groups of patients remained free to consult their GPs throughout the course of the study, and could be prescribed psychotropic drug treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were assessed at baseline, and 8 weeks and 26 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome measure was psychological symptoms measured on the Clinical Interview Schedule -- Revised. Other measures included social functioning, health-related quality of life, problem severity and satisfaction. The economic outcomes were evaluated with a cost--utility analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four CMHNs were trained to provide problem-solving under supervision, and another 29 were referred patients for generic support. In total, 247 patients were randomised to the three arms of the study, referred by 98 GPs in 62 practices. All three groups of patients were greatly improved by the 8-week follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups at 8 weeks or 26 weeks in symptoms, social functioning or quality of life. Greater satisfaction with treatment was found in the CMHN groups. CMHN care represented a significant additional health service cost and there were no savings in sickness absence.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that specialist mental health nurse support is no better than support from GPs for patients with anxiety, depression and reactions to life difficulties. The results suggest that healthcare providers could consider adopting policies of restricting referrals of unselected patients with common mental disorders to specialist CMHNs, although there may be other roles in primary care that CMHNs could play effectively. Further research should address the predictors of chronicity in common mental disorders and target extra treatment. More research is also needed into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of problem-solving treatment for other disorders, of facilitated self-help treatments for common mental disorders and of CMHN care for people with severe and enduring mental illnesses, as well as the prevention of mental disorders.

The financial cost of optimising blood pressure control

We have investigated the financial costs of attempts to optimise blood pressure control in patients referred to our blood pressure clinic. At first referral, the average blood pressure in the 262 patients studied were 167/97 mmHg and the monthly costs of the antihypertensive drugs was 23.44 pounds. After 1 year of clinic attendance, the blood pressure was reduced to 149/87 mmHg, and the average drug costs had risen to 30.68 pounds. For drug expenditure alone, the cost of reducing systolic blood pressure by 1 mmHg was 0.36p pounds (Euro 0.55, USD 0.55) and for diastolic blood pressure the cost-was 0.72p pounds (Euro 1.12, USD 1.13).

Assessment of control measures to achieve a food safety objective of less than 100 CFU of Listeria monocytogenes per gram at the point of consumption for fresh precut iceberg lettuce

The important new concept of the food safety objective (FSO) offers a strategy to translate public health risk into a definable goal such as a specified maximum frequency or concentration of a hazardous agent in a food at the time of consumption that is deemed to provide an appropriate level of health protection. For the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, there is a proposed FSO of < 100 CFU/g in ready-to-eat (RTE) products at the time of consumption. Fresh precut iceberg lettuce is one of these RTE products. In this study, we worked with a commercial manufacturer to evaluate the effectiveness of two antimicrobial washing agents (sodium hypochlorite and a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid) against L. monocytogenes under simulated fresh precut washing conditions and evaluated the growth potential of this pathogen on lettuce packaged in a gas-permeable film and stored at 4 or 8 degrees C for 14 days. We used the results of this experiment to demonstrate how the commercial manufacturer could meet the FSO for L. monocytogenes in fresh precut lettuce through the application of performance, process, and microbiological criteria.

Needs assessment and discharge: a Scottish perspective

Discharge from hospital remains a difficult area for health services and it is unclear how much impact policy directives have had on discharge outcomes. The recent National Service Framework for mental health has highlighted discharge as a key area with Standard Five indicating minimum requirements at discharge from hospital. In order to aid this process this paper discusses the findings of a needs assessment of patients following discharge from psychiatric inpatient care in Scotland. The needs and unmet needs as assessed by both patients and mental health community staff on the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) are presented. The CAN seeks to identify needs in a range of domains addressing basic, health, social, functioning and service issues. The sample comprised 173 patients recently discharged from acute psychiatric units in eight health board areas of Scotland and 98 community staff identified as providing key support to 98 of the patient sample. The findings indicate that the needs of patients discharged from hospital are complex and that the targeting of mental health services according to diagnostic criteria may not be the best way of ensuring support reaches those in most need. The range of needs identified suggests that fully integrated multidisciplinary care is essential to meet needs at discharge. The period initially after hospital discharge is one of vulnerability and incorporating a needs assessment into the discharge planning could aid the care planning process required by the Framework.

Rheumatic manifestations of hyperlipidaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is characterized by elevated serum cholesterol, tendon xanthomas, xanthelasmas, arcus corneae and premature atherosclerosis. Rheumatological manifestations include acute episodes of polyarthritis and tendinitis. Patients who are homozygous for familial hypercholesterolaemia have cardiovascular and rheumatological manifestations more frequently and at an earlier age than patients who are heterozygous.

The A1166C mutation in the angiotensin II type I receptor and hypertension in the elderly

1. Using a nested case-control study of 661 non-institutionalized elderly (> or = 60 years) residents of Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia, the aim of this study is to determine whether the A1166C polymorphism of the angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptor gene is associated with hypertension in the elderly. 2. Individuals were classified as isolated systolic hypertension (ISH, n = 146), systolic diastolic hypertension (SDH, n = 188), or normotensive, age- and sex-matched controls (n = 327). AA, CC and AC genotypes were determined using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of DNA generated by nested polymerase chain reaction. 3. A univariate analysis (chi 2) was complemented by a logistic regression analysis, facilitating adjustment for potential confounders. The unadjusted genotype and allele frequencies in ISH or SDH subjects did not differ significantly from the control subjects (chi 2 = 3.0, P = 0.55, 4 d.f.; chi 2 = 3.0, P = 0.23, 2 d.f., respectively). After adjustment for potential confounders neither genotype nor allele predicted ISH or SDH in this cohort. 4. From this study we conclude that the A1166C polymorphism of the AT1 receptor gene is not a marker for ISH nor for SDH in this large, elderly community sample.

A comparative study of the efficacy of simvastatin and gemfibrozil in combined hyperlipoproteinemia: prediction of response by baseline lipids, apo E genotype, lipoprotein(a) and insulin

Combined hyperlipoproteinemia (CHL) can be difficult to treat because of the heterogeneous nature of the lipoprotein abnormalities. We compared the relative efficacies of simvastatin and gemfibrozil and sought predictors of responsiveness in terms of the baseline lipids and other potential metabolic determinants (plasma insulin, Lp(a) and apo E genotype). Sixty-six subjects entered a cross-over, randomized trial involving 12 weeks on each drug. Efficacy was assessed after 6 and 12 weeks on each treatment. Simvastatin lowered total cholesterol 24%, triglycerides 12%, LDL cholesterol 33%, raised HDL cholesterol 13% and substantially reduced the cholesterol:triglyceride ratio in VLDL and IDL. Gemfibrozil lowered total cholesterol 5%, triglycerides 44%, raised HDL 26% and reduced VLDL and IDL lipids more than simvastatin did. LDL size increased with both treatments and HDL size increased with simvastatin. Responsiveness (25% fall in cholesterol or 40% fall in triglycerides) was shown by 31/61 subjects when taking simvastatin (cholesterol-lowering) and by 44/60 taking gemfibrozil (triglyceride-lowering). Responsiveness was greatest in those with apo E2 genotype with both drugs (P < 0.05). Unexpectedly, responders to simvastatin tended to have lower baseline total cholesterol but higher triglyceride levels than those whose cholesterol or triglyceride was lowered by gemfibrozil. Nevertheless, more hypercholesterolemic subjects responded to simvastatin and more hypertriglyceridemic subjects to gemfibrozil. Lp(a) (P = 0.04) and plasma insulin concentrations (P = 0.03) were negative predictors of percentage triglyceride-lowering with gemfibrozil. The difference between the two drugs in triglyceride-lowering lessened with rising insulin and falling HDL cholesterol. Thus, the responsiveness to the two major classes of lipid lowering drugs can be partly predicted from baseline lipids and related metabolic parameters.