26
|
La Hoz RM, Mufti AR, Vagefi PA. Short-Term liver transplant outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract NAT positive donors. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 24:e13757. [PMID: 34741572 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
On April 2021, the United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Executive Committee approved the "Lower Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Testing for Lung Donors" emergency policy upon recommendation from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. This policy requires that all lung donors be tested for SARS-CoV-2 in a lower respiratory specimen by nucleic acid test and that the results be available before the lungs are transplanted. The overarching goal of the emergency policy was to minimize the risk of donor-derived COVID-19 to lung recipients. However, an unintended consequence of the policy was the emergence of a new population of potential donors: the SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract nucleic acid test positive donor. We describe the use of two SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract nucleic acid test positive liver donors without a known history of COVID-19 infection with adequate short-term outcomes. The recipients did not have a prior history of COVID-19, nor did they receive monoclonal antibodies post-transplantation; one was unvaccinated. If the safety and long-term outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive donors is confirmed in larger studies, this strategy represents a promising way to increase the pool for organ donation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
|
27
|
Mahan LD, Lill I, Halverson Q, Mohanka MR, Lawrence A, Joerns J, Bollineni S, Kaza V, La Hoz RM, Zhang S, Kershaw CD, Terada LS, Torres F, Banga A. Post-infection pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 among patients with lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13739. [PMID: 34605596 PMCID: PMC8646912 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited data on outcomes among lung transplant (LT) patients who survive Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS Any single or bilateral LT patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 1, 2020, to February 15, 2021 (n = 54) and survived the acute illness were included (final n = 44). Each patient completed at least 3 months of follow-up (median: 4.5; range 3-12 months) after their index hospitalization for COVID-19. The primary endpoint was a significant loss of lung functions (defined as > 10% decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) on two spirometries, at least 3 weeks apart compared to the pre-infection baseline). RESULTS A majority of the COVID-19 survivors had persistent parenchymal opacities (n = 29, 65.9%) on post-infection CT chest. Patients had significantly impaired functional status, with the majority reporting residual disabilities (Karnofsky performance scale score of 70% or worse; n = 32, 72.7%). A significant loss of lung function was observed among 18 patients (40.9%). Three patients met the criteria for new chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following COVID-19 (5.6%), with all three demonstrating restrictive allograft syndrome phenotype. An absolute lymphocyte count < 0.6 × 103 /dl and ferritin > 150 ng/ml at the time of hospital discharge was independently associated with significant lung function loss. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of COVID-19 survivors suffer persistent allograft injury. Low absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and elevated ferritin levels at the conclusion of the hospital course may provide useful prognostic information and form the basis of a customized strategy for ongoing monitoring and management of allograft dysfunction. TWEET Twitter handle: @AmitBangaMD Lung transplant patients who survive COVID-19 suffer significant morbidity with persistent pulmonary opacities, loss of lung functions, and functional deficits. Residual elevation of the inflammatory markers is predictive.
Collapse
|
28
|
AbdulRahim N, McAdams M, Xu P, Wojciechowski D, La Hoz RM, Lu C, Vazquez MA, Hedayati SS. Association of Inflammatory Biomarkers with Immunosuppression Management and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2451-2467. [PMID: 34465422 PMCID: PMC8349691 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, such as acute kidney injury (AKI), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. The association of inflammatory biomarkers with outcomes and the impact of changes in immunosuppression on biomarker levels are unknown. METHODS We investigated factors associated with a composite of AKI, ICU admission, or death, and whether immunosuppression changes correlated with changes in inflammatory biomarkers and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Of 59 patients, 50% had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients who discontinued calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) had higher peak high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) than those who maintained the same dose (median, 344; interquartile range [IQR], 145-374 vs median, 41; IQR, 22-116 mg/L, P = .03). Of the patients, 73% were hospitalized, 22% had admissions to the ICU, and 20% died. Of the 56% with AKI, 35% required dialysis. All patients with AKI but without pulmonary manifestations recovered to 10% of baseline creatinine levels. Factors associated with the composite outcome were eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (odds ratio [OR], 5.833; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.880-18.099; P = .002), hs-CRP (OR, 1.011/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.002-1.021; P = .019), white blood cell count (OR, 1.173/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.006-1.368; P = .041), and decreased or discontinued CNI (OR, 4.286; 95% CI, 1.353-13.572; P = .013). eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 11.176; 95% CI, 1.581-79.001; P = .016), and peak hs-CRP (OR, 1.010/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.000-1.020; P = .049) remained associated with the composite in the multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have high rates of ICU admissions, AKI, and death. Those with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 are at highest risk. CNI reduction is associated with higher inflammatory biomarkers, correlating with worse outcomes. More studies are needed to determine if this association should drive clinical management.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bixler D, Annambhotla P, Montgomery MP, Mixon‐Hayden T, Kupronis B, Michaels MG, La Hoz RM, Basavaraju SV, Kamili S, Moorman A. Unexpected hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation — United States, 2014–2019. Am J Transplant 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
30
|
Heldman MR, Kates OS, Safa K, Kotton CN, Georgia SJ, Steinbrink JM, Alexander BD, Hemmersbach-Miller M, Blumberg EA, Crespo MM, Multani A, Lewis AV, Eugene Beaird O, Haydel B, La Hoz RM, Moni L, Condor Y, Flores S, Munoz CG, Guitierrez J, Diaz EI, Diaz D, Vianna R, Guerra G, Loebe M, Rakita RM, Malinis M, Azar MM, Hemmige V, McCort ME, Chaudhry ZS, Singh P, Hughes K, Velioglu A, Yabu JM, Morillis JA, Mehta SA, Tanna SD, Ison MG, Tomic R, Derenge AC, van Duin D, Maximin A, Gilbert C, Goldman JD, Sehgal S, Weisshaar D, Girgis RE, Nelson J, Lease ED, Limaye AP, Fisher CE. COVID-19 in hospitalized lung and non-lung solid organ transplant recipients: A comparative analysis from a multicenter study. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2774-2784. [PMID: 34008917 PMCID: PMC9215359 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplant recipients (LTR) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have higher mortality than non-lung solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), but direct comparisons are limited. Risk factors for mortality specifically in LTR have not been explored. We performed a multicenter cohort study of adult SOTR with COVID-19 to compare mortality by 28 days between hospitalized LTR and non-lung SOTR. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality among LTR vs. non-lung SOTR and to determine risk factors for death in LTR. Of 1,616 SOTR with COVID-19, 1,081 (66%) were hospitalized including 120/159 (75%) LTR and 961/1457 (66%) non-lung SOTR (p = .02). Mortality was higher among LTR compared to non-lung SOTR (24% vs. 16%, respectively, p = .032), and lung transplant was independently associated with death after adjusting for age and comorbidities (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, p = .04). Among LTR, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0-11.3, p = .05) was the only independent risk factor for mortality and age >65 years, heart failure and obesity were not independently associated with death. Among SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19, LTR had higher mortality than non-lung SOTR. In LTR, chronic allograft dysfunction was independently associated with mortality.
Collapse
|
31
|
La Hoz RM, Danziger-Isakov LA, Klassen DK, Michaels MG. Risk and reward: Balancing safety and maximizing lung donors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2635-2636. [PMID: 33756070 PMCID: PMC8250396 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In response to Kaul et al.’s article (page 2885), the editorialists recommend testing lower respiratory tract samples from potential deceased lung donors for SARS-CoV-2 to mitigate the risk of donor derived disease.
Collapse
|
32
|
Linder KA, Kovacs C, Mullane KM, Wolfe C, Clark NM, La Hoz RM, Smith J, Kotton CN, Limaye AP, Malinis M, Hakki M, Mishkin A, Gonzalez AA, Prono MD, Ostrander D, Avery R, Kaul DR. Letermovir treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13687. [PMID: 34251742 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few options are available for cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in transplant recipients resistant, refractory, or intolerant to approved agents. Letermovir (LET) is approved for prophylaxis in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, but little is known about efficacy in CMV infection. We conducted an observational study to determine the patterns of use and outcome of LET treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients. METHODS Patients who received LET for treatment of CMV infection were identified at 13 transplant centers. Demographic and outcome data were collected. RESULTS Twenty-seven solid organ and 21 HCT recipients (one dual) from 13 medical centers were included. Forty-five of 47 (94%) were treated with other agents prior to LET, and 57% had a history of prior CMV disease. Seventy-seven percent were intolerant to other antivirals; 32% were started on LET because of resistance concerns. Among 37 patients with viral load < 1000 international units (IU)/ml at LET initiation, two experienced >1 log rise in viral load by week 12, and no deaths were attributed to CMV. Ten patients had viral load > 1000 IU/ml at LET initiation, and six of 10 (60%) had a CMV viral load < 1000 IU/ml at completion of therapy or last known value. LET was discontinued in two patients for an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with LET with viral load < 1000 IU/ml had good virologic outcomes. Outcomes were mixed when LET was initiated at higher viral loads. Further studies on combination therapy or alternative LET dosing are needed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Bixler D, Annambhotla P, Montgomery MP, Mixon-Hayden T, Kupronis B, Michaels MG, La Hoz RM, Basavaraju SV, Kamili S, Moorman A. Unexpected Hepatitis B Virus Infection After Liver Transplantation - United States, 2014-2019. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2021; 70:961-966. [PMID: 34237046 PMCID: PMC8312757 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7027a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Unexpected donor-derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is defined as a new HBV infection in a recipient of a transplanted organ from a donor who tested negative for total antihepatitis B core antibody (total anti-HBc), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and HBV DNA* before organ procurement. Such infections are rare and are associated with injection drug use among deceased donors (1). During 2014-2019, CDC received 20 reports of HBV infection among recipients of livers from donors who had no evidence of past or current HBV infection. Investigation included review of laboratory data and medical records. Fourteen of these new HBV infections were detected during 2019 alone; infections were detected a median of 38 (range = 5-116) weeks after transplantation. Of the 14 donors, 13 were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-seropositive† and had a history of injection drug use within the year preceding death, a positive toxicology result, or both. Because injection drug use is the most commonly reported risk factor for hepatitis C,§ providers caring for recipients of organs from donors who are HCV-seropositive or recently injected drugs should maintain awareness of infectious complications of injection drug use and monitor recipients accordingly (2). In addition to testing for HBV DNA at 4-6 weeks after transplantation, clinicians caring for liver transplant recipients should consider testing for HBV DNA 1 year after transplantation or at any time if signs and symptoms of viral hepatitis develop, even if previous tests were negative (2).
Collapse
|
34
|
Mahan LD, Points A, Mohanka MR, Bollineni S, Joerns J, Kaza V, La Hoz RM, Gao A, Zhang S, Torres F, Banga A. Characteristics and outcomes among lung transplant patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13661. [PMID: 34159688 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe characteristics and outcomes among lung transplantation (LT) patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and elucidate the predictors of 1-year survival after RSV infection. METHODS This was a retrospective chart review study among LT patients with RSV infection between 2013 and 2018 (90 episodes among 87 patients; mean age 56.3 ± 13.1 years, M:F 52:35). A contemporaneous control group consisting of LT patients without RSV infection (n = 183) was included. One-year survival after the RSV infection was the primary endpoint. RESULTS Median time from LT to RSV infection was 30 (1-155) months. Before RSV infection, the median decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) was 9.7 cc (-17.8 to 83 cc) or 0.29% (-1.4% to 4.6%) per month, while the forced expiratory volume (FEV1 ) decline was 7.5 cc (-8.8 to 58 cc) or 0.3% (-0.57% to 4.3%) per month with no statistically significant change after RSV infection. One-year survival among patients with RSV infection was 86.2% (75/87). Pre-infection diagnosis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD; adjusted HR: 4.29, 1.08-17.0; P = .038) and FVC or FEV1 decline >10% during 6 months post infection (adjusted HR: 35.1, 3.26-377.1; P = .003) were independently associated with worse survival. On propensity score matched analysis, RSV infection was not associated with worse post-transplant survival (HR with 95% CI: 0.79, 0.47-1.34; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS A majority of LT patients in the current cohort did not experience an alteration in the trajectory of FVC or FEV1 decline after developing RSV infection, and their post-transplant survival was not adversely impacted. Established CLAD at the time of RSV infection and post infection >10% decline in FVC or FEV1 are independently associated with worse survival after RSV infection.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mohanka MR, Mahan LD, Joerns J, Lawrence A, Bollineni S, Kaza V, La Hoz RM, Kershaw CD, Terada LS, Torres F, Banga A. Clinical characteristics, management practices, and outcomes among lung transplant patients with COVID-19. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:936-947. [PMID: 34172387 PMCID: PMC8130587 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are limited data on management strategies and outcomes among lung transplant (LT) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We implemented management protocols based on the best available evidence and consensus among multidisciplinary teams. The current study reports our experience and outcomes using this protocol-based management strategy. Methods We included single or bilateral LT patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab between March 1, 2020, to December 15, 2020 (n = 25; median age: 60, range 20-73 years; M: F 17:8). A group of patients with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection during 2016-18 were included to serve as a comparator group (n = 36). Results As compared to RSV, patients with COVID-19 were more likely to present with constitutional symptoms, spirometric decline, pulmonary opacities, new or worsening respiratory failure, and need for ventilator support. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were less likely to receive a multimodality treatment strategy, and they experienced worse post-infection lung function loss, functional decline, and three-month survival. A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 needed readmission for worsening allograft function (36.4%), and chronic kidney disease at initial presentation was associated with this complication. Lower pre-morbid FEV1 appeared to increase the risk of new or worsening respiratory failure, which was associated with worse outcomes. Overall hospital survival was 88% (n = 22). Follow-up data was available for all discharged patients (median: 43.5 days, range 15-287 days). A majority had persistent radiological opacities (19/22, 86.4%), with nearly half of the patients with available post-COVID-19 spirometry showing > 10% loss in lung function (6/13, median loss: 14.5%, range 10%-31%). Conclusions Despite similar demographic characteristics and predispositions, LT patients with COVID-19 are sicker and experience worse outcomes as compared to RSV. Despite the availability of newer therapeutic agents, COVID-19 continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
36
|
Penumarthi LR, La Hoz RM, Wolfe CR, Jackson BR, Mehta AK, Malinis M, Danziger-Isakov L, Strasfeld L, Florescu DF, Vece G, Basavaraju SV, Michaels MG. Cryptococcus transmission through solid organ transplantation in the United States: A report from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1911-1923. [PMID: 33290629 PMCID: PMC8096655 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cryptococcus species can cause serious life-threatening infection in solid organ transplant recipients by reactivation of prior infection, posttransplant de novo infection, or donor transmission from the transplanted organ. Although previously reported in the literature, the extent of donor-derived cryptococcosis in the United States has not been documented. We analyzed potential donor-derived Cryptococcus transmission events reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for investigation by the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). All reports between 2009 and 2019 in which transmission to recipients was designated proven or probable, or determined to be averted due to implementation of prophylaxis (intervention without disease transmission-"IWDT") were included. During 2009-2019, 58 reports of potential donor-derived cryptococcosis were submitted to DTAC. Among these reports, 12 donors were determined to have resulted in proven or probable transmission to 23/34 (67.6%) recipients. Most of these donors (10/12 [83%]) exhibited central nervous system-related symptoms prior to death and 5/23 (22%) infected recipients died. For 11 different donors, prophylaxis, most often with fluconazole, was administered to 23/35 (65.7%) recipients. Clinicians should maintain awareness of donor-derived cryptococcosis and consider prompt prophylaxis or treatment followed by reporting to OPTN for further investigation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Poon YK, La Hoz RM, Hynan LS, Sanders J, Monogue ML. Tedizolid vs Linezolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab093. [PMID: 33884276 PMCID: PMC8047851 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment options for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are limited by the pathogen's intrinsic resistance profile and toxicities. Tedizolid and linezolid display in vitro activity against NTM species. However, safety data and treatment outcomes are limited in the solid organ transplant (SOT) population. Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult SOT recipients receiving linezolid or tedizolid for an NTM infection from January 1, 2010, to August 31, 2019. The primary outcome compared the hematologic safety profiles of tedizolid vs linezolid. We also described nonhematological adverse drug events (ADEs) and therapy discontinuation rates. In an exploratory analysis, we assessed symptomatic microbiologic and clinical outcomes in those receiving tedizolid or linezolid for at least 4 weeks. Results Twenty-four patients were included (15 tedizolid, 9 linezolid). No differences were identified comparing the effects of tedizolid vs linezolid on platelet counts, absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs), and hemoglobin over 7 weeks using mixed-effects analysis of variance models. ANC was significantly decreased in both groups after 7 weeks of therapy (P = .04). Approximately 20% of patients in each arm discontinued therapy due to an ADE. Seven of 12 (58%) and 2 of 3 (67%) patients were cured or clinically cured with tedizolid- and linezolid-containing regimens, respectively. Conclusions This study suggests no significant safety benefit of tedizolid over linezolid for the treatment of NTM infections in SOT recipients. Tedizolid or linezolid-containing regimens demonstrated a potential benefit in symptomatic and microbiologic improvement. Larger cohorts are needed to further delineate the comparative role of linezolid and tedizolid for the treatment of NTM infections in SOT recipients.
Collapse
|
38
|
Taimur S, Pouch SM, Zubizarreta N, Mazumdar M, Rana M, Patel G, Freire MP, Pellett Madan R, Kwak EJ, Blumberg E, Satlin MJ, Pisney L, Clemente WT, Zervos MJ, La Hoz RM, Huprikar S. Impact of pre-transplant carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales colonization and/or infection on solid organ transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14239. [PMID: 33527453 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The impact of pre-transplant (SOT) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization or infection on post-SOT outcomes is unclear. We conducted a multi-center, international, cohort study of SOT recipients, with microbiologically diagnosed CRE colonization and/or infection pre-SOT. Sixty adult SOT recipients were included (liver n = 30, hearts n = 17). Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 47, 78%) was the most common pre-SOT CRE species. Median time from CRE detection to SOT was 2.32 months (IQR 0.33-10.13). Post-SOT CRE infection occurred in 40% (n = 24/60), at a median of 9 days (IQR 7-17), and most commonly due to K pneumoniae (n = 20/24, 83%). Of those infected, 62% had a surgical site infection, and 46% had bloodstream infection. Patients with post-SOT CRE infection more commonly had a liver transplant (16, 67% vs. 14, 39%; p =.0350) or pre-SOT CRE BSI (11, 46% vs. 7, 19%; p =.03). One-year post-SOT survival was 77%, and those with post-SOT CRE infection had a 50% less chance of survival vs. uninfected (0.86, 95% CI, 0.76-0.97 vs. 0.34, 95% CI 0.08-1.0, p =.0204). Pre-SOT CRE infection or colonization is not an absolute contraindication to SOT and is more common among abdominal SOT recipients, those with pre-SOT CRE BSI, and those with early post-SOT medical and surgical complications.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kaul DR, Vece G, Blumberg E, La Hoz RM, Ison MG, Green M, Pruett T, Nalesnik MA, Tlusty SM, Wilk AR, Wolfe CR, Michaels MG. Ten years of donor-derived disease: A report of the disease transmission advisory committee. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:689-702. [PMID: 32627325 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite clinical and laboratory screening of potential donors for transmissible disease, unexpected transmission of disease from donor to recipient remains an inherent risk of organ transplantation. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) was created to review and classify reports of potential disease transmission and use this information to inform national policy and improve patient safety. From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017, the DTAC received 2185 reports; 335 (15%) were classified as a proven/probable donor transmission event. Infections were transmitted most commonly (67%), followed by malignancies (29%), and other disease processes (6%). Forty-six percent of recipients receiving organs from a donor that transmitted disease to at least 1 recipient developed a donor-derived disease (DDD). Sixty-seven percent of recipients developed symptoms of DDD within 30 days of transplantation, and all bacterial infections were recognized within 45 days. Graft loss or death occurred in about one third of recipients with DDD, with higher rates associated with malignancy transmission and parasitic and fungal diseases. Unexpected DDD was rare, occurring in 0.18% of all transplant recipients. These findings will help focus future efforts to recognize and prevent DDD.
Collapse
|
40
|
Dollard SC, Annambhotla P, Wong P, Meneses K, Amin MM, La Hoz RM, Lease ED, Budev M, Arrossi AV, Basavaraju SV, Thomas CP. Donor-derived human herpesvirus 8 and development of Kaposi sarcoma among 6 recipients of organs from donors with high-risk sexual and substance use behavior. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:681-688. [PMID: 32633035 PMCID: PMC7891580 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of recipient human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or through donor-derived HHV-8 transmission. We describe 6 cases of donor-derived HHV-8 infection and KS investigated from July 2018 to January 2020. Organs from 6 donors, retrospectively identified as HHV-8-positive, with a history of drug use disorder, were transplanted into 22 recipients. Four of 6 donors had risk factors for HHV-8 infection reported in donor history questionnaires. Fourteen of 22 organ recipients (64%) had evidence of posttransplant HHV-8 infection. Lung recipients were particularly susceptible to KS. Four of the 6 recipients who developed KS died from KS or associated complications. The US opioid crisis has resulted in an increasing number and proportion of organ donors with substance use disorder, and particularly injection drug use history, which may increase the risk of HHV-8 transmission to recipients. Better awareness of the risk of posttransplant KS for recipients of organs from donors with HHV-8 infection risk could be useful for recipient management. Testing donors and recipients for HHV-8 is currently challenging with no validated commercial serology kits available. Limited HHV-8 antibody testing is available through some US reference laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Collapse
|
41
|
Poon YK, Hoz RML, Sanders J, Hynan LS, Monogue M. 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020. [PMCID: PMC7776191 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment options for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are limited by the long-term tolerability of antimicrobials. The oxazolidinones, linezolid and tedizolid, display in vitro activity against many NTM species and demonstrate excellent oral bioavailability. This study compares the hematologic safety profile of linezolid versus tedizolid for the treatment of NTM in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adult SOT recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat NTM between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the hematologic effects of linezolid versus tedizolid from therapy initiation to week seven. This time frame was chosen based on the median duration of therapy. A mixed-effects ANOVA model was used to assess the effects of linezolid and tedizolid on platelet counts (PLT), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), and hemoglobin (Hgb) across time. Subjects were treated as a random effect. The secondary analysis described the proportion of adverse effects and discontinuation.
Results
Twenty-four patients were included in the analysis (9 linezolid, 15 tedizolid). Mycobacterium abscessus abscessus was the most common isolate, and pulmonary was the most common site of infection (Table 1). The median duration of therapy was 24 days (range 3 to 164 days) and 48 days (range 11 to 571 days) for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively. All patients in the linezolid group received 600 mg daily or less for the majority of treatment duration. In the mixed-effects ANOVA, the ANC decreased in both groups after seven weeks of therapy (p=0.04). Otherwise, no significant effects for week, treatment group, or interaction between week and treatment group were found (Figure 1). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were common in both groups, and around one-fifth of patients in each group discontinued the medication due to adverse effects (Table 2).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat nontuberculous mycobacteria infections between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019 at UT Southwestern Medical Center.
Table 2. Adverse drug events and discontinuation of therapy over seven weeks of therapy.
Figure 1. Effects of linezolid versus tedizolid during the initial seven weeks of therapy using a mixed-effects ANOVA model, (a) platelet counts, (b) absolute neutrophil counts, and (c) hemoglobin.
Conclusion
Non-significant statistical differences were found comparing the effects of linezolid versus tedizolid for PLT, ANC, and Hgb using mixed-effects ANOVA models. Larger cohort studies are required to compare the hematologic adverse effect profile of the oxazolidinones for the treatment of NTM infections in SOT recipients.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Collapse
|
42
|
Moscowitz AE, Bae EY, Hoz RML, Cutrell JB, Monogue M. 62. Factors Associated with 30-Day ED Readmission Following Initial ED Discharge for Suspected Sepsis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020. [PMCID: PMC7776508 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Given the increased mortality associated with delayed recognition of sepsis, emergency departments (ED) often use protocols to rapidly identify and treat suspected sepsis. However, screening criteria such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) lack specificity and may over-diagnose sepsis in patients otherwise stable for discharge. Our study describes outcomes and identifies factors associated with ED readmission in those initially discharged directly from the ED who met sepsis criteria.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients (≥ 18 years) seen in the ED at UTSW Medical Center from January to June 2018 who met all the following: ≥ 2 SIRS criteria; received ≥ 1 dose of intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibiotic(s) in the ED; were discharged home. A multivariable logistic regression model identified factors associated with 30-day re-admission to our ED, using clinically significant variables parsimoniously. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
A total of 179 patients were included. Forty-four patients (25%) returned to the ED within 30 days of their initial visit; of those 44, 63.6% (28) returned for issues related to their prior visit, and 50% (22) were admitted to the hospital. Table 1 compares baseline demographics of patients with suspected sepsis readmitted to the ED with those not readmitted within 30 days after initial ED discharge. In univariable analysis, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and length of antibiotic therapy (ED plus discharge antibiotics) were associated with ED re-admission (table 1). Receipt of antibiotics on discharge was not significant. In the final multivariable analysis (table 2), initial qSOFA ≥ 2 alone was associated with increased risk of ED re-admission (OR 7.5, p=0.01).
Table 1. Baseline demographics of patients readmitted and not readmitted to the ED within 30 days after ED discharge with suspected sepsis
Table 2. Multivariable logistic regression of risk factors for patients readmitted and not readmitted to the ED within 30 days after ED discharge with suspected sepsis
Conclusion
In this cohort, 25% of patients with suspected sepsis initially discharged from the ED were readmitted to our ED within 30 days. A qSOFA ≥ 2 at the initial ED visit was associated with increased risk of readmission, suggesting a potential use of qSOFA to triage those warranting admission or closer follow-up. Larger prospective studies are warranted in this understudied population of patients who meet screening sepsis criteria but are discharged from the ED.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Collapse
|
43
|
Poon YK, Monogue M, Sanders J, Hoz RML. 1083. Clinical Efficacy of Tedizolid for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus complex Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020. [PMCID: PMC7776214 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Mycobacterium abscessus complex is a rapidly growing mycobacteria notoriously refractory to therapy due to inherent antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone with in vitro activity against many nontuberculous mycobacteria species, including M. abscessus complex. This study describes the clinical outcomes of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with M. abscessus complex infection treated with tedizolid at a single medical center.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adult SOT recipients who met the ATS/IDSA criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial infection and were treated with a multi-drug regimen that included tedizolid for at least four weeks between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019. Symptomatic improvement was defined as either decreased cough or sputum production for pulmonary infection and decrease in size of the primary lesion for skin or surgical site infection. The criteria for a microbiologic response was more than one negative culture with the causative species and sustained until the end of treatment. Clinical cure was defined as improvement of symptoms without proven negative cultures during and sustained until the end of treatment. A patient was considered cured if both symptomatic (if applicable) and microbiologic criteria were fulfilled. The clinical outcomes were compared from the initiation of tedizolid-containing regimen to the end of any M. abscessus complex treatment.
Results
Twelve patients were included. Mycobacterium abscessus abscessus (7/12, 58%) was the most common subspecies. The distribution of infections were as follows: five (42%) disseminated infections, five (42%) pulmonary infections, five (42%) surgical site infections, and four (33%) skin and soft tissue infections. Six patients were cured or clinically cured for all sites of infection (50%), three patients died (25%), and one patient had two recurrences (Table 1).
Table 1. Patient demographics and outcomes of M. abscessus complex infection.
Conclusion
Most patients had multiple sites of infection, and treatment required combination antimicrobial therapy and appropriate surgical management. In this small cohort, tedizolid-containing regimens demonstrated a potential benefit in symptomatic and microbiologic improvement in SOT recipients with M. abscessus complex infection.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Collapse
|
44
|
Jones JM, Kracalik I, Rana MM, Nguyen A, Keller BC, Mishkin A, Hoopes C, Kaleekal T, Humar A, Vilaro J, Im G, Smith L, Justice A, Leaumont C, Lindstrom S, Whitaker B, La Hoz RM, Michaels MG, Klassen D, Kuhnert W, Basavaraju SV. SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Recent Organ Recipients, March-May 2020, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 27:552-555. [PMID: 33327990 PMCID: PMC7853574 DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.204046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted public health investigations of 8 organ transplant recipients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Findings suggest the most likely source of transmission was community or healthcare exposure, not the organ donor. Transplant centers should educate transplant candidates and recipients about infection prevention recommendations.
Collapse
|
45
|
La Hoz RM, Wallace A, Barros N, Xie D, Hynan LS, Liu T, Yek C, Schexnayder S, Grodin JL, Garg S, Drazner MH, Peltz M, Haley RW, Greenberg DE. Epidemiology and risk factors for varicella zoster virus reactivation in heart transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 23:e13519. [PMID: 33220133 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Heart transplant (HT) recipients are at higher risk of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. Risk factors for VZV reactivation are currently not well defined, impeding the ability to design and implement strategies to minimize the burden of this illness in this population. Automated data extraction tools were used to retrieve data from the electronic health record (EHR) of all adult HT recipients at our center between 2010 and 2016. Information from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Analysis and Research Files was merged with the extracted data. Potential cases were manually reviewed and adjudicated using consensus definitions. Cumulative incidence and risk factors for VZV reactivation in HT recipients were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling, respectively. In 203 HT recipients, the cumulative incidence of VZV reactivation at 8-years post-transplantation was 26.4% (95% CI: 17.8-38.0). The median time to VZV reactivation was 2.1 years (IQR, 1.5-4.1). Half (14/28) of the cases experienced post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Post-transplant CMV infection (HR 9.05 [95% CI: 3.76-21.77) and post-transplant pulse-dose steroids (HR 3.19 [95% CI: 1.05-9.68]) were independently associated with a higher risk of VZV reactivation in multivariable modeling. Identification of risk factors will aid in the development of targeted preventive strategies.
Collapse
|
46
|
Mahan LD, Kanade R, Mohanka MR, Bollineni S, Joerns J, Kaza V, Torres F, La Hoz RM, Banga A. Characteristics and outcomes among patients with community-acquired respiratory virus infections during the first year after lung transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 35:e14140. [PMID: 33146445 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study describes the spectrum of community-acquired respiratory infections (CARV) during the first year after lung transplantation (LT). Additionally, we elucidate variables associated with CARV, management strategies utilized, and impact on early and late outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective study among patients transplanted between 2012 and 2015 (n = 255, mean age 55.6 ± 13.5 years, M: F 152:103). The diagnosis of CARV was based on the multiplex PCR on nasopharyngeal swab samples. Baseline characteristics, post-transplant variables, and outcomes were compared among patients with and without CARV. RESULTS Eighty CARV infections developed among a quarter of the study group (n = 62, 24.3%). Rhinovirus/enterovirus was the most commonly isolated CARV (n = 24) followed by coronavirus (n = 17) and RSV (n = 9). A significant proportion of episodes (43.8%) required hospitalization. The use of nasal corticosteroids and left single LT was independently associated with an increased risk of CARV. CARV infections did not impact the lung functions during the first year or the CLAD-free survival at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant burden of CARV infections during the first year after LT. The use of nasal corticosteroids may increase the risk of CARV infection. CARV infections did not impact outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
La Hoz RM, Liu T, Xie D, Adams-Huet B, Willett DL, Haley RW, Greenberg DE. The use of automated data extraction tools to develop a solid organ transplant registry: Proof of concept study of bloodstream infections. J Infect 2020; 82:41-47. [PMID: 33038385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We created an electronic health record-based registry using automated data extraction tools to study the epidemiology of bloodstream infections (BSI) in solid organ transplant recipients. The overarching goal was to determine the usefulness of an electronic health record-based registry using data extraction tools for clinical research in solid organ transplantation. METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adult solid organ transplant recipients from 2010 to 2015. Extraction tools were used to retrieve data from the electronic health record, which was integrated with national data sources. Electronic health records of subjects with positive blood cultures were manually adjudicated using consensus definitions. One-year cumulative incidence, risk factors for BSI acquisition, and 1-year mortality were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling, and 30-day mortality with logistic regression. RESULTS In 917 solid organ transplant recipients the cumulative incidence of BSI was 8.4% (95% confidence interval 6.8-10.4) with central line-associated BSI as the most common source. The proportion of multidrug-resistant isolates increased from 0% in 2010 to 47% in 2015 (p = 0.03). BSI was the strongest risk factor for 1-year mortality (HR=8.44; 4.99-14.27; p<0.001). In 11 of 14 deaths, BSI was the main cause or contributory in patients with non-rapidly fatal underlying conditions. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the usefulness of an electronic health record-based registry using automated extraction tools for clinical research in the field of solid organ transplantation. A BSI reduces the 1-year survival of solid organ transplant recipients. The most common sources of BSIs in our studies are preventable.
Collapse
|
48
|
Theodoropoulos NM, La Hoz RM, Wolfe C, Vece G, Bag R, Berry GJ, Bucio J, Danziger-Isakov L, Florescu DF, Goldberg D, Ho CS, Lilly K, Malinis M, Mehta AK, Nalesnik MA, Sawyer R, Strasfeld L, Wood RP, Michaels MG. Donor derived hepatitis B virus infection: Analysis of the Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 23:e13458. [PMID: 32894634 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted from organ donor to recipient, but details of transmission events are not widely published. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) evaluated 105 cases of potential donor derived transmission events of HBV between 2009-2017. Proven, probable or possible transmission of HBV occurred in 25 (23.8%) cases. Recipients of liver grafts were most commonly infected (20 of 21 exposed recipients) compared to 9 of 21 exposed non-hepatic recipients. Eleven of 25 donors were HBV core antibody (HBcAb) positive/HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and infected 8/20 recipients. Of the 10 liver recipients and 1 liver-kidney recipient who received organs from these donors: six were not given antiviral prophylaxis, two developed infection after antiviral prophylaxis was discontinued, two developed HBV while on lamivudine prophylaxis, one was on antiviral prophylaxis and did not develop HBV viremia or antigenemia. One recipient of a HBcAb positive/HBsAg negative kidney developed active HBV infection. Unexpected donor-derived transmission of HBV was a rare event in reports to DTAC, but was often detected in the recipient late post-transplant. Six of 11 recipients (54.5%) of a liver from a HBcAb positive donor did not receive prophylaxis; all of these were potentially preventable with the use of anti-viral prophylaxis.
Collapse
|
49
|
Michaels MG, La Hoz RM, Danziger-Isakov L, Blumberg EA, Kumar D, Green M, Pruett TL, Wolfe CR. Coronavirus disease 2019: Implications of emerging infections for transplantation. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1768-1772. [PMID: 32090448 PMCID: PMC9800450 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The recent identification of an outbreak of 2019- novel Coronavirus is currently evolving, and the impact on transplantation is unknown. However, it is imperative that we anticipate the potential impact on the transplant community in order to avert severe consequences of this infection on both the transplant community and contacts of transplant patients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Michelis KC, La Hoz RM, Araj FG. Bone pain in a heart transplant recipient. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1458-1460. [PMID: 32333515 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|