Tolerance to lens tilt and decentration of two multifocal intraocular lenses: using the quick contrast sensitivity function method

BACKGROUND

Quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method is an advanced quick method for contrast sensitivity function (CSF) evaluation. This study evaluated the contrast sensitivity (CS) of eyes undergoing cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and its tolerance to IOL tilt and IOL decentration using the qCSF method.

METHODS

Patients undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification and a trifocal IOL (Zeiss AT LISA tri 839MP, Carl Zeiss, Germany) or an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00, Johnson & Johnsons, USA) implantation were included. Monocular contrast sensitivity was measured using the qCSF method at one month post-surgery. IOL tilt and decentration were measured using an optical aberrometer (OPD-Scan III, NIDEK, Japan).

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients/eyes with the 839MP IOL and 64 patients/eyes with the ZXR00 IOL were included. Area under the log CSF (AULCSF) and CS acuity did not differ significantly between the two groups. The ZXR00 IOL group showed better CS at 1 cpd (1.137 ± 0.164 vs. 1.030 ± 0.183 logCS) and 1.5 cpd (1.163 ± 0.163 vs. 1.071 ± 0.161 logCS), while the 839MP IOL group had better CS at 6 cpd (0.855 ± 0.187 vs. 0.735 ± 0.363 logCS). In the 839MP IOL group, all CSF metrics were negatively correlated with IOL tilt (all P < 0.05), while in the ZXR00 IOL group, the CS at 3 cpd had no significant correlation with IOL tilt (P > 0.05). Among myopic eyes, fewer CSF metrics were negatively correlated with IOL tilt in the ZXR00 IOL group than in the 839MP IOL group. No significant correlation was found between CSF metrics and IOL decentration.

CONCLUSIONS

The ZXR00 and the 839MP IOL groups presented comparable CSF. CS was negatively correlated with IOL tilt, instead of decentration in multifocal IOLs, particularly among myopic eyes. The ZXR00 IOL had better tolerance to IOL tilt in myopic eyes.

Efficacy of a One-Piece Aberration Neutral Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric Intraocular Lens

PURPOSE

To assess the refractive outcomes, intraocular centration and rotational stability of the enVista toric intraocular lens (IOL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective, multi-centre, double-masked, partially randomized and partially controlled clinical trial. A total of 191 participants were implanted with toric IOL (1.25, 2.00, or 2.75D) or non-toric IOL (control). The lowest range of corneal astigmatic eyes were randomized to 1.25D toric or control. Higher astigmatic powers were allocated to the treatment arm. Subjects were assessed immediately postoperatively, 1-2 (V1), 7-14 (V2), 30-60 (V3) and 120-180 (V4) days postoperatively. Unaided (UDVA) and distance corrected visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction and corneal curvature were assessed. Vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced refractive correction (SIRC), correction ratio (CR), error magnitude (EM) and error vector (EV). Slit-lamp photography was used to measure centration and rotational stability.

RESULTS

UDVA was better in the low toric IOL group in comparison with the control group at V4 (p<0.001). There was an undercorrection in the control group, whereas the average CR for all toric subjects was 1.00 ± 0.32: V2, 0.98 ± 0.34: V3 and 0.98 ± 0.35: V4. The absolute IOL rotational stability in comparison to the position of the IOL at V1 was 1.35° ± 0.97°: V2, 1.35° ± 1.07°: V3 and 1.38° ± 1.25°: V4. Decentration was generally inferior (V1: 0.04 ± 0.22mm, V2: 0.05± 0.20mm, V3: 0.08 ± 0.22mm, V4: 0.04 ± 0.21mm) and nasal (V1: 0.19 ± 0.23mm, V2: 0.20 ± 0.20mm, V3: 0.20 ± 0.21mm, V4: 0.17 ± 0.22mm).

CONCLUSION

Participants with low levels of corneal astigmatism achieved superior vision and refractive outcomes in the low toric group over the control. Moderate and high levels of astigmatism achieved excellent refractive outcomes. The toric IOL demonstrated high levels of both rotational and centrational stability.

Comparative study between conventional and 4 mm manual small-incision cataract surgery

Purpose

Comparative study of intraoperative and postoperative complications, visual outcomes, and cost-effectiveness between conventional and 4-mm manual small-incision cataract surgery with MVR blade.

Methods

In total, 600 patients having nuclear sclerosis grade I-IV were operated under peribulbar anesthesia and were divided into two groups of 300 each. In group A (300), conventional small-incision cataract surgery was done, whereas in group B (300), 4-mm manual small-incision cataract surgery was performed through a 4-mm sclerocorneal tunnel. A wire vectis was passed through the 4-mm incision below the nucleus to stabilize it, and a 20-G MVR blade was introduced from 11o'clock limbus and nucleus was bisected into two halves, which were removed through main incision. Cortical wash was given, and foldable IOL was implanted. Intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. Postoperative visual outcome and surgically induced astigmatism between the two groups was studied.

Results

The most common intraoperative complication was hyphema (11.33%) and irido-dialysis (8.00%), whereas postoperatively, striate keratopathy (36.33%) and hyphema (19.33%) were common. Short-term complications such as striate keratopathy, hyphema, and irido-dialysis were significantly more in group B, and long-term results in terms of visual outcome and surgically induced astigmatism were significantly less in group B.

Conclusion

Although intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications were observed more in 4-mm manual small-incision cataract surgery, it was found to be more effective in terms of surgically induced astigmatism and final visual outcome. In addition, it is cost-effective as compared to phacoemulsification.

Soemmerring's Rings Developed around IOLs, in Human Donor Eyes, Can Present Internal Transparent Areas

Soemmerring's rings consist of a ring of lens epithelial derived cells that grow along the periphery of an aphakic lens capsule, or around an intraocular lens. These rings when visualized frontally, appear opaque, however, in some cases the cells that compose these rings are organized in the same fashion as those in normal transparent adult lenses. Thus, our purpose was to test whether any part of the adult Soemmerring's ring could be transparent and how this related to morphological factors. To study this, 16 Soemmerring's rings were extracted from donor eye globes. After imaging, they were thickly sectioned sagittally in order to analyze the degrees of transparency of different areas. All samples were also histologically analyzed using alpha smooth muscle actin, Vimentin, wheat germ agglutinin and DAPI. Our results showed that many samples had some transparent areas, mostly towards the center of their cross-section. Of the factors that we analyzed, only lens fiber organization at the bow region and an increased area of mature lens fiber cells had a significant relation to the degree of transparency at the center. Thus, we can conclude that as Soemmerring's rings mature, they can develop organized and transparent areas of lens cells.

The influence of the Artisan-Verisyse position on the postoperative outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Iris-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) is considered a safe and effective option for the correction of aphakia in patients with insufficient capsular support. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence about the Artisan/Verisyse IOLs and to assess the influence of the IOL position on the postoperative outcomes. Three different databases were used for this systematic review and metaanalysis (PubMED, Scopus, and Embase). We searched for case series or clinical trials comparing the prepupillary versus retropupillary Artisan/Verisyse implantation. The statistical analysis was performed with the programming language R (version 3.6.1 2019-07-05). The number of articles included in the meta-analysis was six, with 506 eyes included in total. We found no significant differences in postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.309 [0.089-0.528] vs. 0.32 [0.2-0.44]), spherical equivalent (SE) (0.0153 D [-0.362 to 0.393] vs. -0.329 D [-0.62 to - 0.038]), and central corneal cell density (CECD) (1669.85 cells [1605.949-2150.937] vs. 1635.99 cells [1413.64-1858.363]) between the prepupillary and the retropupillary implantation, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of cystoid macular edema (CME; 7.70% vs. 9.8%), pupil deformation (4.5% vs. 5.4% retropupillary), or IOL luxation (2.3% and 2.2%). We found little influence of the IOL position in the postoperative analyzed outcomes. Thus, the implant position should be based on the surgeon's technical experience. Double-blind randomized prospective studies would improve the available evidence on the best implant position for the Artisan/Verisyse IOL.

SMILE for the Treatment of Residual Refractive Error After Cataract Surgery

INTRODUCTION

In the context of managing patients' expectations and satisfaction regarding visual acuity after cataract surgery, we aimed to investigate the improvement in visual acuity and patient satisfaction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in pseudophakic (trifocal intraocular lens, IOL) patients with residual myopic refraction after cataract surgery.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients (82 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery with ZEISS AT LISA tri 839MP IOL implantation were included in this retrospective study. The included patients were 56-79 years old, wanted spectacle independence, and had preoperative myopic refraction between - 1.0 and - 2.25 diopters (D) and astigmatism between - 0.75 and - 1.75 D. The treatment status of these patients was defined as trifocal IOL (n = 82). SMILE was performed in patients who were dissatisfied after cataract surgery, and these patients were followed up for 1 year on average. We evaluated visual acuity and satisfaction and further examined laser vision correction and satisfaction levels in patients who were dissatisfied after trifocal IOL implantation.

RESULTS

The possible reasons for patient dissatisfaction were reading books, using a computer, and driving at night. After SMILE, the residual myopic refractive error (spherical) decreased significantly from - 2.08 ± 0.28 [- 2.25 to - 1.0] preoperatively to - 0.25 ± 0.20 - 0.5 to 0] 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the uncorrected distance visual acuity increased from 0.65 ± 0.08 [0.52-0.7] logMAR preoperatively to 0.09 ± 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.001), 0.09 ± 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 6 months postoperatively, and 0.06 ± 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction measures after SMILE (reading, night driving, and using a computer) were significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

SMILE is a reliable method for treating residual refraction after cataract surgery, as it provides results in the shortest time without complications and increases patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04693663).

Effects on ocular aberration and contrast sensitivity after implantation of spherical and aspherical monofocal intraocular lens - A comparative study

Purpose:

Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the standard of care for cataractous eyes. Monofocal IOLs are spherical or aspheric. The aspheric design of IOLs reduces the spherical and higher-order aberrations and impacts contrast sensitivity post cataract surgery. There are some studies, but data in the Indian setting with the IOLs we used is lacking. We aimed to compare the effect of implantation of spheric and aspheric foldable intraocular lenses on postoperative quality of vision, spherical aberration, and contrast sensitivity.

Methods:

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital with an ophthalmology specialty, data collection from January 2017 to May 2018 in 100 patients. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Their preoperative and postoperative data were collected and divided into groups based on whether spherical or aspheric IOL was implanted after cataract surgery. Variables assessed were visual acuity on days 7 and 30, spherical aberrations, and contrast sensitivity was assessed at 1-month postoperative.

Results:

The mean age of the patients in this study was 64 ± 8 years with a majority of patients (60%) being females. There is no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity between the two groups. Internal SA was significantly lower (~50%) in eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs (P value = 0.004, 0.0001) compared with the spherical group. Contrast sensitivity of patients of the aspheric group was significantly better (P value <0.05).

Conclusion:

The optical design of the aspheric IOLs reduced spherical aberrations and increased contrast sensitivity.

Spectral transmittance of animal intraocular lenses in comparison with the spectral properties of their biological lenses

PURPOSE

To determine the spectral transmittance of artificial intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed for various species (dog, cat, chinchilla, eagle, tiger) and compare them to the spectral properties of the biological lenses of these species.

METHODS

Twenty-seven IOLs were scanned with a spectrophotometer fitted with an integrating sphere.

RESULTS

All IOLs transmitted long wavelengths well before cutting off sharply at short wavelengths, with insignificant transmission below ca. 340 nm. In comparison with the IOLs, the biological lenses of the cat, dog, and probably the chinchilla transmitted significantly more short wavelengths. The spectral properties of the biological lenses of eagles and tigers, while uncertain, may be a closer match to the IOLs made for these species.

CONCLUSION

It is not known if there are any visual or behavioral consequences for animals caused by a mismatch between the spectral properties of their biological lenses and IOLs. However, following IOL implantation there might be a change in the perceived hue of objects due to the removal of UV wavelengths which form a normal part of the visible spectrum for these species and/or a decrease in sensitivity.

Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism

PURPOSE

Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k) devices.

RESULTS

Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p < 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p < 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, < 6/9 was 58%, and < 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (> 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k (p < 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K. The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas.

Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia

Purpose

To present a case of a 62-year-old patient implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) who underwent a bilateral IOL exchange due to positive dysphotopsia. In an attempt to reduce the symptoms and compensate for the loss of multifocality, we implanted an aspheric monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in one eye and a spherical monofocal IOL in the other eye.

Observations

The patient presented with complaints of halo and glare, measured with a simulator, following the implantation of segmented multifocal IOLs two years earlier. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Before presentation at our clinic, a laser capsulotomy had been performed on the right eye. We proceeded with a bilateral IOL exchange. Because of capsular insufficiency in the right eye, we implanted a spherical monofocal three-piece IOL in the ciliary sulcus with optic capture. In the left eye, we used a monofocal IOL with an enhanced intermediate function. Two weeks postoperatively, UDVA (monocularly) was 20/20 in OD and OS, the uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) was 20/32, and the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 20/50. Binocularly, UDVA was 20/20, UIVA was 20/25 and UNVA was 20/25. The patient reported a marked decrease in halos and glare.

Conclusions and importance

When planning IOL exchange surgery, in cases of intolerance to multifocal IOLs, the clinician should consider the dilemma of loss of multifocality. Recent developments in monofocal IOL technology present new options to improve visual function in cases of multifocal IOL explantation.

Automatic segmentation of intraocular lens, the retrolental space and Berger's space using deep learning

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a deep learning model to automatically segment three structures using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): The intraocular lens (IOL), the retrolental space (IOL to the posterior lens capsule) and Berger's space (BS; posterior capsule to the anterior hyaloid membrane).

METHODS

An artificial intelligence (AI) approach based on a deep learning model to automatically segment the IOL, the retrolental space, and BS in AS-OCT, was trained using annotations from an experienced clinician. The training, validation and test set consisted of 92 cross-sectional OCT slices, acquired in 47 visits from 41 eyes. Annotations from a second experienced clinician in the test set were additionally evaluated to conduct an inter-reader variability analysis.

RESULTS

The AI model achieved a Precision/Recall/Dice score of 0.97/0.90/0.93 for IOL, 0.54/0.65/0.55 for retrolental space, and 0.72/0.58/0.59 for BS. For inter-reader variability, Precision/Recall/Dice values were 0.98/0.98/0.98 for IOL, 0.74/0.59/0.62 for retrolental space, and 0.58/0.57/0.57 for BS. No statistical differences were observed between the automated algorithm and the inter-reader variability for BS segmentation.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning model allows for fully automatic segmentation of all investigated structures, achieving human-level performance in BS segmentation. We, therefore, expect promising applications of the algorithm with particular interest in BS in automated big data analysis and real-time intra-operative support in ophthalmology, particularly in conjunction with primary posterior capsulotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Reversible deposition of inflammatory cells on the surface of an intraocular lens in a patient with uveitis: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The deposition of inflammatory cells on an intraocular lens (IOL) is a rare but potentially serious complication. We report a patient who presented with reversible severe deposition of inflammatory cells on the anterior surface of a hydrophobic IOL.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 68-year-old woman with remissive uveitis presented with blurred vision in her right eye that persisted for 1 month. She had undergone cataract surgery and hydrophobic IOL (ZA9003, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) implantation 3 months before presentation. Deposition of inflammatory cells was diagnosed by ocular examination. The IOL became transparent after 6 months of treatment with combined antibiotic/steroid eyedrops (tobramycin/dexamethasone eyedrops) and atropine. However, the cellular deposition recurred after either discontinuing the tobramycin/dexamethasone eyedrops or switching to steroid-only eyedrops (fluorometholone). Therefore, she was prescribed continuous tobramycin/dexamethasone eyedrops, twice-daily, and her IOL remained transparent at the time of submission of this article.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported a case of reversible severe deposition of inflammatory cells on the anterior surface of a hydrophobic IOL in a patient with uveitis that was managed by continuous administration of combined antibiotic/steroid eyedrops. The morphology of the inflammatory cells deposits and the treatment differed from those of previously reported cases.

Preliminary Clinical Outcomes of a New Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To assess the preliminary clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of the new enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) LuxSmart™ intraocular lens IOL and to compare with a conventional monofocal IOL (Akreos™) in patients who had undergone bilateral cataract surgery.

Methods

Twelve patients underwent bilateral LuxSmart IOL implantation, and twelve underwent bilateral Akreos IOL implantation. Best-corrected distance (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 66cm, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40cm and defocus curve were assessed. Patients-reported visual function was inquired by Catquest-9SF. The presence of photic phenomena was evaluated. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results

The mean IOL power was +21.90D in LuxSmart group and +22.30D in Akreos. Monocular UDVA (p = 0.32) and CDVA (p = 0.52) did not differ between groups. The average binocular UIVA (0.18 ± 0.12 logMAR vs. 0.30 ± 0.13 logMAR, p < 0.001) and UNVA (0.38 ± 0.14 logMAR vs. 0.44 ± 0.17 logMAR, p = 0.02) were higher in LuxSmart IOL group. No patients reported disabling photic phenomena in either group.

Conclusion

This study shows that new LuxSmart EDOF IOL achieved higher performance for intermediate and near vision compared with a conventional monofocal IOL, without increasing the risk of dysphotopsias. LuxSmart may be an attractive and safe option for patients who desire spectacle independence for distance and intermediate vision after cataract surgery.

The use of polyisobutylene-based polymers in ophthalmology

A novel polyolefin called poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (“SIBS”) originated from Joseph P. Kennedy's laboratory at the University of Akron (Akron, Ohio, United States) and was developed as a biomaterial for long-term implant applications by the author. SIBS has no cleavable groups on its backbone or sidechains, is comprised predominantly of alternating secondary and quaternary carbons on its backbone, which prevents embrittlement and cracking under flexion, and undergoes multiple purification steps which renders it extremely biocompatible and well-suited for long-term applications in the eye. This article explores two ophthalmic devices; 1) the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt (Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) made from SIBS that lowers intraocular pressure to thwart progression of vision loss from glaucoma, and 2) a novel intraocular lens (IOL) made from crosslinked polyisobutylene, which is under-development by Xi'an Eyedeal Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (Xi'an, China) that does not glisten nor cloud over time, as do most conventional IOLs.

•

A novel class of ultra-biostable polyisobutylene-based biomaterials for long-term implant applications.

•

A novel class of polyisobutylene-based biomaterials that is not bioactive and elicits minimal foreign body reaction.

•

A device called the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt to treat glaucoma made from poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS).

•

A novel crosslinked polyisobutylene material for intraocular lens applications that eliminates glistenings and halos.

[Surgical treatment of hypermature cataract in patients with lens subluxation and small pupil]

Studying the possibilities of hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification in complicated situations is a relevant problem in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE

To develop a technique for hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification in patients with a combination of hypermature cataract, small pupil and lens subluxation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification of hypermature cataracts was performed in 36 patients (36 eyes) aged 63 to 78 years with grade I-II lens subluxation in combination with small pupil. The initial circular femtolaser capsulotomy was performed within the small pupil using the VICTUS system (Technolas Perfect Vision, Germany). After dilating the pupil with retractor hooks, the capsulorhexis was manually expanded to the required diameter.

RESULTS

In all cases, the resulting capsulorhexis had a regular round shape with a smooth edge, without radial ruptures. This made it possible to apply modern methods of fixation and centration of the capsular bag in case of lens subluxation and to perform intracapsular implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). Complete intracapsular fixation of the IOL with optics edge fully covered by the edge of the capsulorhexis in the postoperative period was achieved in 34 (94.4%) cases. In 2 (5.6%) cases in the postoperative period, the edge of the capsulorhexis exceeded the edge of the IOL optics. The loss of corneal endothelial cells 3 months after surgery was 8.8±1.9%.

CONCLUSION

The use of the proposed combined technique of capsulorhexis made it possible to perform the most physiologically appropriate intracapsular IOL implantation in all patients with hypermature cataract, small pupil and lens subluxation.

[Femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification of hypermature cataract in patients with lens subluxation]

Studying the modern capabilities of femtosecond laser in the treatment of complicated cataracts is a topical problem in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE

To develop a technique for femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification of hypermature cataract in patients with degree I-II lens subluxation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Phacoemulsification of hypermature cataract with comorbid lens subluxation was performed in 78 patients (78 eyes) divided into two groups. In the 1st group (45 eyes), capsulorhexis was performed using a femtosecond laser. Patients of the 2nd group (33 eyes) underwent manual capsulorhexis. The study assessed the possible frequency of using modern methods of capsular bag fixation and complete all-in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, as well as the number of various types of intraoperative capsular bag ruptures.

RESULTS

In all patients of the 1st group, capsulorhexis of the correct round shape and the required diameter was achieved, allowing the use of modern methods of fixation and centering of the capsular bag. Insignificant tear of the edge of the capsulorhexis after IOL implantation was detected only in 1 (2.2%) patient. Vitreous prolapse was noted in 1 (2.2%) case. In the 2nd group, manual technique resulted in oval capsulorhexis with a smooth edge, allowing the use of modern methods of fixation of the capsular bag only in 7 (21.2%) cases. Vitreous prolapse was noted in 4 (12.1%) cases. The complete in-the-bag IOL implantation was possible in 44 (97.8%) cases in the 1st group and only in 7 (21.2%) in the 2nd group.

CONCLUSION

The use of femtosecond laser in patients with hypermature cataract and lens subluxation allows achieving capsulorhexis of ideally round shape with a smooth edge. This creates the necessary conditions for the use of modern methods of fixation of the capsular bag and provides the possibility of complete all-in-the-bag IOL implantation.

Brain Functional Network Architecture Reorganization and Alterations of Positive and Negative Affect, Experiencing Pleasure and Daytime Sleepiness in Cataract Patients after Intraocular Lenses Implantation

Background: Cataracts are associated with progressive blindness, and despite the decline in prevalence in recent years, it remains a major global health problem. Cataract extraction is reported to influence not only perception, attention and memory but also daytime sleepiness, ability to experience pleasure and positive and negative affect. However, when it comes to the latter, the magnitude and prevalence of this effect still remains uncertain. The current study aims to evaluate the hemodynamic basis of daytime sleepiness, ability to experience pleasure and positive and negative affect in cataract patients after the intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Thirty-four cataract patients underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging evaluation before and after cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Both global and local graph metrics were calculated in order to investigate the hemodynamic basis of excessive sleepiness (ESS), experiencing pleasure (SHAPS) as well as positive and negative affect (PANAS) in cataract patients. Results: Eigenvector centrality and clustering coefficient alterations associated with cataract extraction are significantly correlated with excessive sleepiness, experiencing pleasure as well as positive and negative affect. Conclusions: The current study reveals the hemodynamic basis of sleepiness, pleasure and affect in patients after cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. The aforementioned mechanism constitutes a proof for changes in functional network activity associated with postoperative vision improvement.

Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction with a New Diffractive-Refractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens - A 12 Month Prospective Study

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of Optiflex Trio, a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) following cataract surgery.

Methods

Patients undergoing phacoemulsification for age-related cataracts and who satisfy the eligibility criteria underwent bilateral implantation with Optiflex Trio trifocal IOL. At follow -up visits of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, binocular uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, reading performance, contrast sensitivity (CS) and patient satisfaction for dysphotopsia and spectacle independence were evaluated using questionnaires.

Results

A total of 54 eyes from 27 patients with mean age of 66.30±7.48 years were included in the study. At 12 months, 78% (n = 21) patients had binocular cumulative UDVA of 20/20 or better. Post-op SE refraction accuracy was within ±0.50 D for 93% (n = 50) eyes, and refractive cylinder accuracy was within ≤0.50 D in 94% (n = 51) eyes. The mean binocular UNVA was 0.01±0.05 LogMAR, and the mean UIVA at 60 and 80 cm was 0.07±0.06 and 0.03±0.05 LogMAR, respectively, at 12 months. Reading speeds at 40, 60 and 80 cm showed improvement overtime. No patient had complained of severe dysphotopsia, and none of the patients required glasses for any activity. No eye underwent YAG-laser capsulotomy for significant PCO at the end of mean follow-up.

Conclusion

After 12 months, Optiflex Trio trifocal IOL provided a complete visual restoration with good visual quality outcomes in terms of uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity. The incidence of dysphotopsia was low, and spectacle independence was high, resulting in good patient satisfaction.

Trial Registry

CTRI/2019/10/021647 (www.ctri.nic.in).

Visual Performances of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens with a Refractive Design: A Prospective Study After Bilateral Implantation

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the visual outcome of a new extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) after bilateral implantation. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed and data were compared with those given by other studies regarding multifocal IOLs, which have the same purpose of giving spectacle independence to the patients.

Methods

The study enrolled 40 eyes of 20 patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of an EDOF IOL (Evolve Soleko, Rome, Italy). The mean age was 74.5±9 years (range 59-83ys). Refractive outcomes and contrast sensitivity were evaluated preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. We also examined reading speed, glare, halos, difficulties in the night driving, the requirement for spectacles, and overall satisfaction with vision. Two questionnaires were administered for this purpose.

Results

At 6 months, the percentage of eyes within ±0.50 diopters (D) from emmetropia was 82.5%. Of all patients, 90% were satisfied with their vision. The percentage of spectacle-free for near and distance vision patients was 70% and 95%, respectively. A postoperative binocular uncorrected 60cm intermediate visual acuity (UI60VA) of 0.2 logMAR or better was achieved in 92% of patients. Contrast sensitivity significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.001) and mean reading speed was good.

Conclusion

This new EDOF IOL seems to provide an effective alternative to patients who desire a spectacle-free lifestyle postoperatively. These lenses can supply a satisfactory distance, intermediate and near vision, and retain good contrast sensitivity, with most patients reporting excellent satisfaction.

[Pupil reconstruction with an artificial iris]

BACKGROUND

Patients with iris defects suffer from severe visual impairment, especially increased glare sensitivity, and cosmetic disturbances. This can constitute a great psychological strain for patients. In the recent past the treatment consisted of iris print contact lenses, sunglasses and simple iris prostheses. The indications for surgical treatment are colobomas of the iris, aniridia, traumatic iris defects and persistent mydriasis. The aim of this review article is to investigate the surgical approaches, complications, functional and aesthetic outcome after implantation of an individual artificial iris prosthesis made from silicone.

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of the literature on the topic of surgical iris reconstruction with an artificial iris in combination with the own experience in more than 120 patients treated by the author in the last 10 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The custom-made flexible silicone iris prosthesis ArtificialIris (HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) assessed in this review is an innovative and versatile option for surgical treatment of iris defects. Patients were examined before and after iris reconstruction with respect to feasibility, complications and outcome.

RESULTS

Change of best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, pupillary opening, glare, contrast sensitivity, endothelial cell count, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle and patient satisfaction were assessed. Furthermore, complications and color match to the residual and fellow iris were assessed.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of an artificial iris is an effective option for the treatment of extensive traumatic iris defects and leads to an individual aesthetically appealing and good functional outcome as well as high patient satisfaction; however, this is an intervention that should not be underestimated because of a flat learning curve and various complications that can occur.

Stability of Various Types of Aspheric Intraocular Lenses After Implantation: A One-Year Retrospective Study

Objective

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of four different types of aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) after implantation.

Methods

This retrospective study included 124 eyes implanted with four different types of aspheric IOLs including a one-piece four-loop fixed hydrophilic acrylic IOL, a one-piece flat fixed acrylic IOL, a one-piece two-loop fixed acrylic IOL, and a three-piece two-loop fixed silicone IOL. IOL decentration, tilt, and ocular coma-like aberration (coma) at one-week, one-month, three-month, and one-year time points were evaluated postoperatively.

Results

IOL decentration, tilt, and coma in the AO, 36A, IQ, and KS-AiN implantation groups were statistically significantly different one week and one year postoperatively (p < 0.01). There were significant differences between each of the pairs of groups (p < 0.01), except for coma between the AO and 36A implantation groups one week postoperatively (p > 0.05). When comparing the different time points (ie, one week, one month, three months, and one year postoperatively), IOL decentration, tilt, and coma were significantly different in each group (p < 0.05). IOL decentration, tilt, and coma in each group increased over the period from one week to one year postoperatively. A positive linear correlation was observed between IOL decentration or tilt and coma one year postoperatively (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

One-piece multi-point fixed acrylic IOLs demonstrate better stability when compared with three-piece two-point fixed silicone IOLs. IOL decentration, tilt, and coma increase gradually over time. Ocular coma-like aberrations are influenced by the stability of IOLs.

Cataract Surgery with Intraocular Lens Implantation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: Outcomes in the Era of Biological Therapy

This study compared the outcomes of cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated chronic anterior uveitis treated with antimetabolite drugs and systemic corticosteroids (Non-Biological Group) versus patients treated with antimetabolites and biological drugs (Biological Group). A cohort of patients with cataract in JIA-associated uveitis undergoing phacoemulsification with IOL implantation was retrospectively evaluated. The main outcome was a change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in the two groups. Ocular and systemic complications were also recorded. The data were collected preoperatively and at 1, 12, and 48 months after surgery. Thirty-two eyes of 24 children were included: 10 eyes in the Non-Biological Group and 22 eyes in the Biological Group. The mean CDVA improved from 1.19 ± 0.72 logMAR preoperatively to 0.98 ± 0.97 logMAR at 48 months (p = 0.45) in the Non-Biological Group and from 1.55 ± 0.91 logMAR preoperatively to 0.57 ± 0.83 logMAR at 48 months (p = 0.001) in the Biological Group. The postoperative complications, including synechiae, cyclitic membrane, IOL explantation, glaucoma, and macular edema, were not statistically different between the two groups. An immunosuppressive treatment with biological drugs can improve the visual outcome after cataract surgery in patients with JIA-associated uveitis, but it does not significantly reduce postoperative ocular complications.

Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) AcrySof® IQ Vivity® intraocular lens implant: a real-life experience

PURPOSE

Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) is a promising intraocular lens (IOL) technology for cataract surgery. The aim of the study was to report the real-life experience related to the implant of EDOF AcrySof® IQ Vivity® (Alcon Inc., USA) IOL.

METHODS

The study was designed as a interventional, prospective, case series with 3 months of follow-up. Patients needing cataract surgery, without any other kind of ocular diseases, were recruited and implanted with AcrySof® IQ Vivity® IOL. We evaluated the refractive success of this IOL through complete ophthalmologic assessments and the administration of the Quality of Vision test. The main outcome measures were the refractive outcome; far, intermediate, and near vision; and Quality of Vision score.

RESULTS

We included 108 eyes (54 patients; age 62 ± 5 years). Intra-operative and post-operative complications were 0%. Thirty out of 100 eyes (28%) required toric IOL. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.4 ± 0.3 LogMAR to 0.0 ± 0.0 LogMAR (p < 0.01). Refractive outcome was very good for far and intermediate visions, whereas a spherical addition of at least + 1.0D was required for near vision. The mean Quality of Vision score was of 15.5 ± 6.5. The most complained visual disturbances were haloes and glares, although resulting well-tolerated. Dynamic pupillometry findings well-correlated with the amount of complained post-operative visual discomforts.

CONCLUSIONS

AcrySof® IQ Vivity® IOL is a well-tolerated choice to correct far and intermediate vision. Spectacles are needed to optimize near vision. Our data strongly suggest dynamic pupillometry as a useful investigation to optimize post-operative refractive success.

Role of Cervical Phosphorylated Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 1 (phIGFBP1) for Prediction of Successful Induction Among Primigravida with Prolonged Pregnancy

Purpose of the Study

To estimate and to compare the levels of cervical phIGFBP-1 among primigravida with prolonged pregnancy, with and without successful induction of labor (IOL).

Methods

A diagnostic study (cross-sectional study design) was conducted in our institution from November 2016 to April 2018 on 84 primigravida at ≥ 41 weeks with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy. The results were analyzed using SPSS software and receiver operating characteristics curves to determine the best cutoff using Youden Index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive (+ LR) and negative likelihood ratio (- LR) were calculated. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive ability of the three markers for successful IOL.

Results

The cutoff level of phIGFBP-1, Bishop score (BS) and transvaginal cervical length (TVL) were 7.8 µg/l, 3 and 3.5 cm, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, + LR and - LR of phIGFBP-1 (> 7.8 µg/l) were 0.87, 0.87, 0.89, 0.85, 6.76 and 0.15, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, phIGFBP-1 was found to be the best predictor of successful IOL (OR 44.200; 95% CI 12.378-157.831, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

phIGFBP-1 is a strong independent predictor successful IOL as compared to TVL and BS in primigravida with prolonged pregnancy.

Outcomes and complications of implantable collamer lens for mild to advance keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome and safety of implantable collamer lens (ICL; (Visian, STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA, USA) in mild to advance keratoconus patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated all patients who underwent ICL implantation for the management of keratoconus at a tertiary care eye hospital from January 2012 to January 2018. The mean duration of follow-up was 15.3 months (range, 3.13 to 38.97 months). Data were collected on preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction was compared, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eyes (32 patients) were evaluated. The median CDVA was 20/30 preoperatively and 20/20 at last follow-up. The median UDVA was 20/25 at last follow-up. Thirteen patients (40.6%) had 20/20 UDVA in comparison to none at baseline. The median spherical equivalent in diopters (D) was -7.875 D (-4.125 to -10.0 D) preoperatively and decreased to -0.3125 D at last follow-up. The median manifest refractive cylinder was 3.00 D (2.25 to 5.25 D) preoperatively and decreased to 1.125 D postoperatively. Cylinder axis rotation of 10° or greater occurred in 3 eyes (9.375%) and required repositioning of the ICL. One patient (3%) developed nonvisually significant anterior subcapsular cataract. One ICL (3.125%) had to be explanted due to residual refractive error and unsatisfactory vision.

CONCLUSION

ICLs are a suitable refractive option for the correction of refractive error associated with stable, nonprogressive keratoconus even in advance cases. However, the risk of ICL rotation and subsequent repositioning remain. Careful patient selection is necessary for achieving good outcomes and mitigating intraoperative and postoperative complications.