Comparison between MB11 BERAphone® and ALGO2e color for hearing screening in Japanese healthy newborns

BACKGROUND

Since 2001, newborn hearing screening has been performed in Japan.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared newborn hearing screening results between the MAICO MB11 BERAphone (MB11) and the Natus ALGO2e color (ALGO) Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) devices among healthy Japanese newborns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2014 to April 2018, 1477 healthy newborns were screened by MB11 and 267 by ALGO. Data from at-risk newborns were not included. Outcomes were 'Pass' and 'Refer' rates, specificity, false-positive rates, and assessment duration. Infants with a Refer result were examined using Interacoustics Eclipse.

RESULTS

MB11 identified 1425 (96.5%) as Pass and 52 (3.5%) as Refer. ALGO identified 263 (98.5%) as Pass and four (1.5%) as Refer. Specificity and false-positive rates were 97.7% and 2.3% for MB11 and 98.5% and 1.5% for ALGO, respectively. Using MB11, the total mean assessment time was 320.2 ± 220.7 s, with 315.6 ± 214.2 s for Pass and 628.6 ± 288.8 s for Refer.

CONCLUSIONS

MB11 is useful for hearing screening in healthy Japanese newborns and is fast and easy to operate. MB11 showed high specificity equivalent to ALGO.

Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Campania region (Italy) between 2013 and 2019

Purpose

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) in the first month of life is crucial for facilitating both early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) of significant permanent hearing impairment (PHI). In Campania region, UNHS has been introduced in 2003 by the Regional Council Resolution and started on January 2007. The aim of this paper is to update a previous article describing the performance of the program since its implementation in the period between 2013 and 2019.

Methods

A longitudinal retrospective study was carried at the Regional Reference Center III on 350,178 babies born in the analysis period. The paper reports the main results of overall coverage, referral rate, lost-to-follow-up rate,yield for PHI and shall determine various risk factor associations with hearing impairment

Results

In Campania region, 318,878 newborns were enrolled at I level, with a coverage rate of 91.06%, 301,818 (86.18%) Well Infant Nurseries (WIN) and 17,060 (5.35%) Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) babies. PHI was identified in 413 children, 288 (69.73%) bilaterally and 125 (30.26%) unilaterally. The overall cumulative incidence rate of PHI was 1.29 per 1000 live-born infants (95% CI 1.17–1.42) with a quite steady tendency during the whole study period.

Conclusions

This study confirms the feasibility and effectiveness of UNHS in Campania region also in a setting with major socioeconomic and health organization restrictions.The program meets quality benchmarks to evaluate the progress of UNHS. Nowadays, it is possible to achieve an early diagnosis of all types of HL avoiding the consequences of hearing deprivation.

Assessment of hearing screening programmes across 47 countries or regions I: provision of newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVES

Newborn hearing screening (NHS) varies regarding number and type of tests, location, age, professionals and funding. We compared the provision of existing screening programmes.

DESIGN

A questionnaire containing nine domains: demography, administration, existing screening, coverage, tests, diagnosis, treatment, cost and adverse effects, was presented to hearing screening experts. Responses were verified. Clusters were identified based on number of screening steps and use of OAE or aABR, either for all infants or for well and high-risk infants (dual-protocol).

STUDY SAMPLE

Fifty-two experts completed the questionnaire sufficiently: 40 European countries, Russia, Malawi, Rwanda, India and China.

RESULTS

It took considerable effort to find experts for all countries with sufficient time and knowledge. Data essential for evaluation are often not collected. Infants are first screened in maternity wards in most countries. Human development index and health expenditure were high among countries with dual protocols, three screening steps, including aABR, and low among countries without NHS and countries using OAE for all infants. Nationwide implementation of NHS took 6 years, on average.

CONCLUSION

The extent and complexity of NHS programmes are primarily related to health expenditure and HDI. Data collection should be improved to facilitate comparison of NHS programmes across borders.

Assessment of hearing screening programmes across 47 countries or regions II: coverage, referral, follow-up and detection rates from newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of newborn hearing screening (NHS) programmes, through selected quality measures and their relationship to protocol design.

DESIGN

NHS coverage, referral, follow-up and detection rates were aggregated. Referral rates were compared to age at screening step 1, number of steps, and test method: OAE or aABR.

STUDY SAMPLE

A questionnaire on existing hearing screening was completed by experts from countries in Europe, plus Russia, Malawi, Rwanda, India and China.

RESULTS

Out of 47 countries or regions, NHS coverage rates were reported from 26, referral rates from 23, follow up from 12 and detection rates from 13. Median coverage rate for step 1 was 96%. Referral rate from step 1 was 6-22% where screening may be performed <24 h from birth, 2-15% for >24 h, and 4% for >72 h. Referral rates to diagnostic assessment averaged 2.1% after one to two steps using OAE only, 1.7% after two steps including aABR, and 0.8% after three to four steps including aABR. Median detection rate for bilateral permanent hearing impairment ≥40dB was 1 per 1000 infants.

CONCLUSION

Referral rates were related to age, test method and number of screening steps. Quality measures were not available for many NHS programmes.

Newborn hearing screening programme based on an integrated hospital and community care system. Results of the first 4 years of activity

Since January 2012, babies born in the province of Modena, Italy, have routinely undergone hearing testing as part of a two-stage screening programme. Newborn hearing screening (NHS) has been based on an integrated hospital and community care system and this study aims to assess screening coverage, referral rates, the prevalence, type and extent of hearing loss several years into the programme. Data were collected from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015. Coverage was over 99% in all five facilities of the province. The ratio of "fails of the screening" to the total number of infants tested varied over the period from 1.2% to 0.9% in the third level facility, and from 0.8% to 0.4% in the other four. Although hearing loss was mainly associated with dysmorphic\syndromic diseases or a family history of hearing loss, some 23% of cases were identified with no known risk factors. We highlight the importance of the NHSP and the need for strong support from healthcare administrators to ensure high coverage. This is especially true since although the prevalence of hearing loss was higher among infants with audiological risk factors, several cases of hearing loss were found in newborns with no known risk factors.

Prevalence and risk factors for delayed-onset hearing loss in early childhood: A population-based observational study in Okayama Prefecture, Japan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to retrospectively document prevalence rates of delayed-onset hearing loss (DOHL) under 7 years old after passing the newborn hearing screening (NHS) program using its database in Okayama Prefecture, as well as records from Okayama Kanariya Gakuen (OKG, Auditory Center for Hearing Impaired Children, Okayama Prefecture, Japan). We explored the percentage of children with DOHL among all children who underwent the NHS and surveyed risk factors abstracted from their clinical records.

METHODS

We collected data of 1171 children, who first visited OKG from April 2006 to March 2018. DOHL children were defined as bilaterally hearing-impaired children who were diagnosed under 7 years old after passing the NHS at birth. Based on the medical records, we investigated age at diagnosis, hearing levels, and risk factors. As population-based data of 168,104 children, the percentage of DOHL subjects was retrospectively calculated among the total number of children who underwent the NHS in Okayama Prefecture from April 2005 to March 2017.

RESULTS

During the period, we identified 96 children with bilateral DOHL, of which 34 children had failed the NHS unilaterally and 62 had passed the NHS bilaterally. Among all children who underwent the NHS in Okayama Prefecture, the prevalence rate of DOHL in unilaterally referred infants was 5.2%, and 0.037% in bilaterally passed children. The prevalence of bilateral DOHL was 0.057% overall. Unilaterally referred children with DOHL were diagnosed at an average of 13.9 months, while bilaterally passed children with DOHL were diagnosed at an average of 42.3 months. Approximately 59.4% of children with DOHL had risk factors, among which family history of hearing loss was the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

We propose the first English report of DOHL prevalence in the prefecture population in Japann, which is among the largest community-based population ever reported. The NHS is not a perfect strategy to detect all early-childhood hearing loss; therefore, careful assessment of hearing throughout childhood is recommended, especially in children with risk factors of hearing loss. Further interventional strategies must be established, such as regular hearing screening in high-risk children and assessments of hearing and speech/language development in public communities and nursery schools.

Current status of universal newborn hearing screening program at 26 institutions in China

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to determine the status of a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program being conducted in parts of China, by comparing differences in the program findings between 2016 and 2017, as well as across regions in China.

METHODS

This study investigated a nationally representative sample of newborns from 26 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China. A ''Newborn Hearing Screening Survey'' questionnaire was sent to 43 hearing screening institutions throughout China and the data were analyzed, with appropriate quality control throughout the study process.

RESULTS

Twenty-six questionnaires, covering 55.88% (19/34) of the provincial administrative regions in China were appropriately completed. The overall sampling frame comprised 238,795 (year 2016) and 229,185 (year 2017) newborns, respectively. We found differences between two years, the initial screening coverage in 2017 (96.10%) was higher than that in 2016 (94.96%); the referral rate at initial screening in 2017 (9.21%) was lower than that in 2016 (10.26%); and the rescreening rate in 2017 (73.50%) was higher than that in 2016 (68.44%). We found differences across three regions, the rescreening rate were highest in West China, the referral rate at rescreening and the referral rate to diagnostic audiological assessment diagnosis were both highest, while the hearing-loss rate was lowest, in the East China in two years. Overall, 61.54% (n = 16) reported using otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), while 38.46% (n = 10) reported using OAEs in combination with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) tests, for the initial screening. For rescreening, most sites (n = 19, 73.08%) reported using OAEs in combination with AABR, followed by OAEs only (n = 4, 15.38%) and AABR only (n = 3, 11.54%). Of the twenty-six institutions, 57.69% (n = 15) were equipped with a digital information management system for UNHS program, East China had the highest rate of it (81.82%, 9/11).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that implementation of a UNHS program had essentially been achieved in many regions of China under the guidance of technical specifications for newborn hearing screening. Compared with 2016, the overall quality of the UNHS program had improved in 2017 and that in East China was better than in the Midland and West China. However, national quality control of the UNHS program is still required to enhance the quality of the program and public education needs to be emphasized to improve the rescreening and reception rate.

Follow-up after failed newborn hearing screening: Parental and primary care provider awareness

PURPOSE

The current loss to follow-up rate after failed newborn hearing screening (NBHS) is 34.4%. Previous studies have found that lack of parental and primary care provider (PCP) awareness of NBHS results are significant contributors to loss to follow-up. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with parental and PCP awareness of NBHS results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. A survey asking about demographics and knowledge of NBHS testing and results was offered to parents in the waiting room of an urban pediatric primary care office. Included were biological parents ≥18 years of age of children ≤10 years of age born in Pennsylvania. Each child's chart was reviewed for PCP documentation of NBHS results. The odds of knowing NBHS results were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 304 parents. 74.0% were aware of their child's NBHS results. Child age ≥1 year old (OR: 0.49, 95%CI[0.29, 0.82], P = 0.007) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.38, 95%CI[0.16, 0.89], P = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of a parent knowing NBHS results. In addition, fewer fathers knew the results of their child's NBHS compared with mothers (OR: 0.33, 95%CI[0.18, 0.62], P < 0.001). However, parental awareness was not associated with birthing facility or insurance type. 222 charts were reviewed for NBHS documentation, revealing PCP awareness in 95.5% of cases and no associations with any of the factors examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with parents not knowing NBHS results included being the parent of an older child, Hispanic, or the father.

Perspectives of newborn hearing screening in resource constrained settings

Newborn hearing screening is an effective strategy for early identification of hearing loss in the newborn which result in early intervention and best outcome. However implementing universal screening strategy is a challenge in many resource constrained settings. There are various limitations towards successful implementation of hearing screening program in the developing countries. The cost effectiveness of the screening program also needs to be considered in a resource constrained settings. We attempt to provide a viewpoint that can be potentially helpful for the successful implementation of hearing screening in a resource constrained settings of the developing countries.

Adherence to follow-up recommendations for babies at risk for pediatric hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the families' compliance with recommendations for continued monitoring of babies with high-risk factors for hearing loss.

METHODS

Hearing screening and follow-up results from 604 babies were tracked across a five-year period. Bivariate analysis, including chi-square analysis, t-tests, and one-way analyses of variance were conducted to test whether various factors predicted likelihood of follow up.

RESULTS

Although 86% of the babies returned for the initial follow-up appointment, few completed the protocol or were diagnosed with hearing loss (10.3%). Excluding the babies who never returned, the average age for initial assessment was near the recommended 3-month target (3.5 months). However, babies were last seen at 9.4 months on average, which is earlier than recommended. Some factors positively predicted follow-up: receipt of ototoxic medication, hyperbilirubinemia requiring transfusion, ECMO, syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, and passing the newborn hearing screening. Others were negatively predictive: NICU stay >5 days, younger maternal age, and failing the newborn screening. There was no relationship between the results of the last test and whether the families continued with monitoring. Babies with risks categorized as more likely to be associated with delayed onset hearing loss were more often late to the initial follow up, but also followed up for a longer period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the need to focus on the barriers unique to babies with risk factors for late onset/progressive hearing loss in addition to those barriers that generally affect loss to follow up. Tools for parental engagement are recommended.

Outcomes of regional-based newborn hearing screening for 35,461 newborns for 5 years in Akita, Japan

OBJECTIVES

Newborn hearing screening (NHS) has been actively performed since 2001 in Akita, Japan. The NHS coverage rate has increased yearly, and performance has been consistently >90% since 2012. The purpose of this study was to summarize NHS outcomes in the Akita prefecture of Japan and to obtain new insights for from our summarized data for the future.

METHODS

A total of 35,461 newborns in hospitals and clinics where hearing screening was performed in Akita from 2012 to 2016 were included. The outcome data of NHS were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

The overall screening coverage rate for hearing loss was 94.7%. Of the screened infants, 0.53% received a referral on the 2-stage automated auditory brainstem response (ABR), and 80.4% of referred infants had a check-up at the hospital to receive a diagnostic hearing examination. Finally, the prevalence of bilateral congenital hearing loss was 0.14%, that of bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss was 0.12%, and that of unilateral congenital hearing loss was 0.10%. Furthermore, the average consultation period in infants with risk factors was significantly later than that in infants without risk factors (p = 0.0015). Follow-up for infants diagnosed with normal hearing after diagnostic hearing examination revealed that 4.7% suffered bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss later. This percentage is significantly higher than that of the general group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of bilateral congenital hearing loss was 0.14% in Akita and 0.12% of infants were diagnosed with bilateral moderate to severe hearing loss. Medical personnel should be enlightened regarding the importance of performing hearing diagnostic examinations until 3 months of age. Even if infants were diagnosed with normal hearing after a diagnostic examination, we strongly suggest continuing follow-up until they are able to perform pure tone audiometry with accuracy.

Comprehensive hearing care network for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss: 8 years' experience in Miyazaki

OBJECTIVE

In 2010, we established the Miyazaki Comprehensive Hearing Care Network (MCHCN) for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss with the cooperation of related administrative bodies in Miyazaki prefecture. The central roles of the MCHCN program are played by the Hearing Care Center (HCC) at the University of Miyazaki Hospital established in 2010 to facilitate audiological diagnoses, hearing aid interventions, and educational efforts, as well as linkage with the Department of Otolaryngology for surgical interventions. Herein, we aimed to present the main outcomes of the MCHCN program organized by the HCC at the University of Miyazaki Hospital.

METHODS

The MCHCN consists of two different networks, the Newborn Hearing Screening Network (NHSN) and the Pediatric Hearing Care Network (PHCN). All children suspected of having hearing loss by Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) are referred to the HCC via the NHSN. In addition, children suspected of late-onset/acquired hearing loss by municipality-led health checkups, pediatricians, public health nurses, and childcare workers are referred to the HCC via the PHCN. Children who were born in Miyazaki prefecture between January 2010 and December 2017 and referred to the HCC for detailed hearing examination were included in this study.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 89,390 infants were born in Miyazaki prefecture, and 84,737 (94.9%) of them underwent NHS. A total of 698 infants and 182 children with suspected hearing loss were referred to the HCC via the NHSN and PHCN, respectively. Of the 880 referrals, 169 were diagnosed with hearing loss, which included 80 children with bilateral hearing loss and 89 children with unilateral hearing loss. Of the 80 children with bilateral hearing loss, 76 began wearing hearing aids and 15 had cochlear implants in the follow-up period. In children with bilateral conductive hearing loss, 4 children with bilateral middle ear anomalies underwent ossiculoplasty, following which two of these children no longer required hearing aids. Imaging assessments performed on 71 of the 89 children with unilateral hearing loss revealed that 20 of the 30 (66%) children who underwent CT exhibited ossicular anomalies and 28 out of the 48 (58%) children who underwent MRI were found to have ipsilateral cochlear nerve hypoplasia. Among the 169 children with hearing loss, no follow-up loss was observed during the period of this study.

CONCLUSION

The MCHCN that was organized at the initiative of the HCC at the University of Miyazaki Hospital has enabled the provision of comprehensive and continuous support, ranging from diagnosis to intervention, not only for children with suspected hearing loss referred based on their NHS results but also for those who pass the screening. Via this system, children with late-onset/acquired hearing loss can be identified early and can receive medical interventions tailored to the cause of their hearing loss while simultaneously avoiding a loss to follow-up.

Early Detection Programmes for Child Hearing Loss in Spain: Current Practices

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

In 2003, The Ministry of Health and Consumption, together with the Autonomous Communities (CCAA), approved a minimum and basic document concerning the establishment of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention State Programmes. Since then, the Commission for the early detection of hearing loss (CODEPEH) has made several updates and recommendations to improve these programmes. The objective of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis of how the CCAA established their Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programs and if they integrate the recommendations made by CODEPEH until 2017.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The programmes (or related documents) of 16 CCAA available on line or paper are reviewed RESULTS: The 16 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention strategies analyzed are different, either in the number of test to be performed, the time in which they are performed or the techniques used. More than a third of these programmes were published before 2010 and have not been updated. Otoacoustic emissions is the chosen technique as the first screening test in nine of the 16 CCAA. Only one CCAA incorporates the salivary polymerase chain reaction test for cytomegalovirus in children with altered screening test.

CONCLUSION

All CCAA perform Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programmes but the heterogeneity does not allow drawing reliable conclusions about the result of the screening process and it would be necessary to aim for unification with the elaboration of a national programme and an integrated general database.

Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital

OBJECTIVE

This study compared otoacoustic emission (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in terms of concordance and cost impact for newborn hearing screening (NBHS) in the Philippine setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study to assess concordance between OAE and AABR involving 253 infants. Each infant underwent OAE and AABR testing. Infants who passed both tests were not required to follow up for additional testing. Infants who failed in any test were scheduled for repeat screening and diagnostic ABR after 1 month. Concordance was computed using B-statistic.

FOR COST ANALYSIS

4 scenarios were compared to 1-step both tests scenario: (1) OAE alone, (2) AABR alone, (3) 2-step OAE, and (4) 2-step AABR in terms of number of infants with hearing loss (HL) detected, cost of diagnosis, and economic loss from lack of treatment.

RESULTS

There was high concordance between OAE and AABR (B-statistic = 0.8). AABR had a higher refer rate (18.58%) than OAE (10.27%) but higher number of detected babies with HL. Cost analysis favored an AABR alone scenario while the 2-step OAE protocol fared poorly.

CONCLUSION

A change from 2-step OAE to AABR alone is worth considering in our institution.

Referral rates for newborn hearing screening based on the test time

OBJECTIVES

To suggest the optimal timing for newborn hearing screening to obtain an ideal and stable referral rate in well babies and in babies in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

METHODS

This study analyzed nationwide hearing screening data of 71,596 newborns in the low-income families who received support from the government in 2017. The referral rate for neonatal hearing screening, based on the period from birth to screening, was compared in well babies (n = 68,206) who were born healthy or hospitalized in the NICU for < 5 days and moved to a well-baby nursery and babies (n = 3,390) who were in the NICU for ≥ 5 days.

RESULTS

In well babies, most screenings (73.1%) were performed in the first three days of life. Most babies (74%) in the NICU underwent screening within the first 20 days after birth. The referral rates for babies at 32-60 days after birth differed from those of other screening days, except for the rates at 21-31 days after birth. Referral rates for NHS at > 60 days after birth were significantly higher than those for other periods in babies overall. However, the incidence of hearing loss according to age did not differ significantly within or between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Referral rates based on the period from birth to screening were significantly different between well babies and NICU babies. To reduce and ensure stable referral rates, we recommend that the hearing screening be performed between 2 and 20 days after birth for well babies and between 5 and 31 days after birth for NICU babies.

Screening of Newborn Hearing at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

Hearing loss can have a devastating impact on the cognitive development and psychological well-being of children and their families. Newborn hearing screening should be given special attention especially in a country like ours where the burden of this disability is heavy. Screening all newborns irrespective of risk factors helps in better detection, and hence further management can be initiated at appropriate time. To implement newborn hearing screening at Vanivilas hospital and to estimate the incidence of hearing loss among the high risk groups. To create awareness about the need for detecting childhood deafness among parents and general population. To develop a centre of excellence for evaluation, intervention and rehabilitation for hearing impaired in a tertiary care hospital. Prospective study. All neonates born in Vanivilas Hospital attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute underwent hearing screening using four stage protocols with otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests and final confirmation with Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) tests. May 2015-May 2017. Number of newborns screened were 26,487, and 19 (0.717/1000) newborns were detected to have hearing impairment. The incidence of hearing loss among high risk group was 0.188/1000, and among the non risk group was 0.528/1000. Newborn hearing screening must be made mandatory and multi-staged protocol based screening for hearing loss should be implemented. This will make newborn screening programme more efficient and also will help in initiating treatment at an early stage so that further damage can be prevented.

Prevalence and risk factors for hearing loss in high-risk neonates in Germany

AIM

Hearing loss in infants is often diagnosed late, despite universal screening programmes. Risk factors of hearing impairment in high-risk neonates, identified from population-based studies, can inform policy around targeted screening. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and the risk factors of hearing loss in a high-risk neonatal population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of neonates hospitalised at the University Hospital Cologne, Germany from January 2009 to December 2014 and were part of the newborn hearing screening programme. Multivariable regression analyses using the lasso approach was performed.

RESULTS

Data were available for 4512 (43% female) neonates with a mean gestational age at birth of 35.5 weeks. The prevalence of hearing loss was 1.6%, and 42 (0.9%) neonates had permanent hearing loss. Craniofacial anomalies, hyperbilirubinaemia requiring exchange transfusion, oxygen supplementation after 36 weeks of gestation and hydrops fetalis showed associations with permanent hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

Our findings of risk factors for hearing loss were consistent with other studies. However, some commonly demonstrated risk factors such as perinatal infections, meningitis, sepsis and ototoxic drugs did not show significant associations in our cohort. Targeted screening based on risk factors may help early identification of hearing loss in neonates.

Newborn hearing screening at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Auditory Brainstem Maturation in preterm infants

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study is to report and discuss the results of 4 years of Newborn hearing screening (NHS) program at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), particularly evaluating the clinical ABR results.

METHODS

Retrospective study. NHS data from NICU newborns, admitted for ≥5 days, in the period from January 1st^, 2013 and December 31st^, 2016, were retrieved and analyzed. NHS results were classified as following: (i) "pass" when both ears for both the a-TEOAE (automated Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions) and the a-ABR (automated Auditory Brainstem Response) protocol resulted as "pass"; (ii) "fail" when one ear, at either one of the two performed tests resulted as "fail"; (iii) "missing" when the newborns were not tested with both protocols. All "fail" and "missing" newborns were retested (with both tests): in the case of a second "fail" result, a clinical ABR was performed within a period of 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1191 newborns were screened. From those, 1044/1191 resulted as "pass", 108/1191 as "fail", and 39/1191 as "missing". During the re-testing of these 147 newborns, 43 were assigned as "missing", 63 were assigned as "pass" (showing bilaterally a wave V identifiable within 30 dB nHL) and 25 failed the retest and/or did not present an identifiable wave V within 30 dB nHL. Among the 147 retested infants, we identified a group of 16 subjects who resulted as NHS "refer" and who, during the audiological follow-up, showed either: (i) a unilateral or bilateral wave V identifiable over 30 dB nHL, at the first clinical ABR assessment; or (ii) a bilateral wave V identifiable within 30 dB nHL, in a following clinical ABR test during the first year of life. These 16 subjects were defined to have an 'Auditory Brainstem Maturation' issue.

CONCLUSIONS

A possible "maturation" of the ABR response (and therefore of the auditory pathway) has been hypothesised in 16 out of 1191 infants (1.3%). A delay of the auditory pathway maturation in preterm babies compared to term newborns has already been suggested in the literature. A possible delay of the NHS retest could be considered, in selected cases, with significant savings in economic resources and parental anxiety.

Newborn hearing screening results of refugees living in our city and the factors affecting the results

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the changes in the risk factors affecting the results of the Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) and the hearing test results of the Syrian refugees in our city.

METHODS

Syrian and Turkish newborns, born in our hospital between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2017 and referred to our hospital from environmental hospitals for NHS, were included in this study. NHS results and risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

786 Syrian and 7230 Turkish newborns were included in this study. 53 (6,74%) infants referred in both ears, 26 (3,30%) infants in the one ear. There was a significant relationship between the presence of hearing loss and the history of intensive care unit admittance, presence and absence of low birth weight and neonatal icterus at Syrian newborns. In the same period, 20 (0,3%) Turkish infants referred bilaterally and 45 (0,6%) newborns unilaterally (25 right ear, 20 left ear). There was a significant difference between Turkish and Syrian newborns in terms of very low and low birth weight and intensive care unit admittance.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of hearing loss in Syrian refugee patients is quite high. Pregnant refugee women who are forced to migrate because of war face many risk factors and these people need to be included into the newborn hearing screening programs in the country where they took refuge in.

Assessing and monitoring the impact of the national newborn hearing screening program in Israel

BACKGROUND

The Israeli Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHSP) began operating nationally in January 2010. The program includes the Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) test for all newborns and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (A-ABR) test for failed OAE and infants at risk for auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders. NHSP targets are diagnosis of hearing impairment by age three months and initiation of habilitation by six months.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Review NHSP coverage; (2) Assess NHSP impact on age at diagnosis for hearing impairment and age at initiation of habilitation; (3) Identify contributing factors and barriers to NHSP success.

METHODS

(1) Analysis of screening coverage and referral rates for the NHSP; (2) Analysis of demographic data, results of coverage, age at diagnosis and initiation of habilitation for hearing impaired infants pre-implementation and post-implementation of NHSP from 10 habilitation centers; (3) Telephone interviews with parents whose infants failed the screening and were referred for further testing.

RESULTS

The NHSP coverage was 98.7% (95.1 to 100%) for approximately 179,000 live births per year for 2014-2016 and average referral rates were under 3%. After three years of program implementation, median age at diagnosis was 3.7 months compared to 9.5 months prior to NHSP. The median age at initiation of habilitation after three years of NHSP was 9.4 months compared to 19.0 prior to NHSP. Parents (84% of 483 sampled) with infants aged 4-6 months participated in the telephone survey. While 84% of parents reported receiving a verbal explanation of the screening results, more than half of the parents reported not receiving written material. Parental report of understanding the test results and a heightened level of concern over the failed screen were associated with timely follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate high screening coverage. The program reduced ages at diagnosis and initiation of habilitation for hearing impaired infants. Further steps needed to streamline the NHSP are improving communication among caregivers to parents to reduce anxiety; increasing efficiency in transferring information between service providers using advanced technology while ensuring continuum of care; reducing wait time for follow-up testing in order to meet program objectives. Establishment of a routine monitoring system is underway.

Hearing Loss and Failed Newborn Hearing Screen

Hearing loss is the most common congenital defect. With early diagnosis and intervention, we are able to improve speech and language outcomes in this population. In this article, we discuss the implications of the newborn hearing screen, as well as diagnostic interventions, management, and intervention, and the increasing role of congenital cytomegalovirus screening.

Newborn hearing screening protocols and their outcomes: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a review of the most current research in objective measures used within newborn hearing screening protocols with the aim of exploring the actual protocols in terms of the types of measures used and their frequency of use within a protocol, as well as their outcomes in terms of sensitivity, specificity, false positives, and false negatives in different countries worldwide.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct were used for the literature search. A total of 422 articles were identified, of which only 15 formed part of the current study. The 15 articles that met the study's criteria were reviewed. Pertinent data and findings from the review were tabulated and qualitatively analysed under the following headings: country; objective screening and/or diagnostic measures; details of screening protocol; results (including false positive and negative findings, sensitivity and/or specificity), conclusion and/or recommendations. These tabulated findings were then discussed with conclusions and recommendations offered.

RESULTS

Findings reported in this paper are based on a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis of the reviewed data. Generally, findings in this review revealed firstly, that there is a lack of uniformity in protocols adopted within newborn hearing screening. Secondly, many of the screening protocols reviewed consist of two or more tiers or stages, with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) being most commonly used. Thirdly, DPOAEs appear to be less commonly used when compared to TEOAEs. Lastly, a question around routine inclusion of AABR as part of the NHS protocol remains inconclusively answered.

CONCLUSIONS

There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the inclusion of AABR within a NHS programme is effective in achieving better hearing screening outcomes. The use of AABR in combination with OAEs within a test-battery approach or cross-check principle to screening is appropriate, but the inclusion of AABR to facilitate appropriate referral for diagnostic assessment needs to be systematically studied.

Extremely common radiographic finding of cochlear nerve deficiency among infants with prelingual single-sided deafness and its clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the common radiographic findings of audiologically documented prelingual single-sided deafness (SSD) and identify the prevalence of cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) in SSD infants referred from the newborn hearing screening program.

METHODS

Between March 2012 and March 2017, the records of all infants referred to our otology clinic after undergoing newborn hearing screening program were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four consecutive well infants without risk factors who had a confirmed diagnosis of prelingual SSD under the age of 1 year and who underwent internal auditory canal (IAC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. The sizes of cochlear nerve (CN), IAC, and cochlear nerve canal (CNC) were measured on MRI. The presence of CND was visually determined by comparing the CN size to the ipsilateral facial nerve (FN) in the affected side via an oblique sagittal view of IAC MRI and defined when CN was absent or smaller than FN.

RESULTS

CND was seen in all 24 deaf ears (100%) on MRI. There was one with incomplete partition type I, and another with combined cochleovestibular nerve absence. Twenty-four subjects demonstrated either an absent (20/24, 83.3%) or small (4/24, 16.7%) CN. When the absent and small CN groups were compared, the former group had a higher prevalence of narrow CNC and narrow IAC. Of the 20 infants without identifiable CN on the affected side, 17 (85%) had narrow IAC and 17 (85%) had narrow CNC. In the 20 ears with absent CN, only one had both normal-sized IAC and CNC.

CONCLUSION

The contribution of CND to prelingual SSD in Korean infants reached 100%, according to IAC MRI alone.

Improving universal newborn hearing screening outcomes by conducting it with thyroid screening

OBJECTIVES

One of the most important factors that can improve hearing screening indicators is testing infants after 48 h of birth. The neonatal thyroid screening program is done during the third to fifth day after birth in many countries. So this screening is done at the appropriate time for hearing screening. The aim of the present study was to evaluate hearing screening outcomes (the referral rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value) conducted with the thyroid screening at the healthcare centers and compare the results with hospital before discharge the infant.

METHODS

This was a prospective exploratory cohort study. The study population included all the newborns at a hospital (group 1) and newborns who were referred to healthcare centers for thyroid screening (group 2), except for infants with risk factors, from March 2012 to December 2017. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) were used for the evaluation. The results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 4729 newborns, who participated in the study, 3001 were referred from a hospital (group 1) and 1728 from two healthcare centers (group 2). The referral rate in group 1 and 2 was 16.1% and 7.6%, respectively. Also, the false positive rate in group 1 and 2 was 15.9% and 7.6%, respectively. Our study showed that the referral rate and false positive rate of hearing screening in group 2 were significantly lower than that in group 1 (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (p < 0.05). There was no significant sex difference in any of the variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that performing the hearing screening during the thyroid program, instead of the hospital could be significantly improved screening outcomes and suggest that hearing and thyroid screening together after discharge from the hospital could be a good opportunity to introduce new framework for hearing screening in many countries.

State of deaf children in West Bengal, India: What can be done to improve outcome

OBJECTIVE

Prelingual deafness in children demands urgent action as best outcome is dependent on earliest possible diagnosis and intervention. Objective of this study was to determine age of suspicion, diagnosis, intervention, and outcome in a representative group of deaf children in West Bengal, India, and suggest ways of improving these parameters.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, ages of suspicion, diagnosis, intervention and outcome of 303 randomly selected deaf children were elicited from a cohort of 1316 children with deafness identified in an earlier study.

RESULTS

Median ages of suspicion, diagnosis and amplification were 18, 72 and 84 months respectively. Age of suspicion was significantly related to parental education (p < 0.05); age of diagnosis to parental education and socio-economic status (p < 0.001) and children's geographic location (p < 0.01). Following diagnosis, 86% of children received hearing aids but only 6% used their aids consistently; 86% were non-verbal, 12% could communicate with a mixture of speech and gesture and only 2% with speech alone.

CONCLUSION

Current situation of deaf children in West Bengal, and evidence indicates, in much of India, is insupportable. However, widely diverse socio-economic conditions and scarcity of public health infrastructure preclude one solution of the problem for the whole country. In absence of the ideal universal newborn hearing screening, rigorously monitored and costed pilot programs of different models of early detection and intervention using newborn hearing screening, targeted screening and trial of calibrated noisemakers by primary care workers should be tried to see which works best where, so that successful programs can be scaled up over time.