Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with hormone replacement therapy does not improve the reproductive outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle in elderly patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

With the rapid development of whole embryo freezing technology, more and more frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was used in assisted reproductive technology. However, the best FET program for elderly women has not been finalized. We intended to explore the reproductive outcomes of traditional hormone replacement treatment and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) combined with hormone replacement treatment in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle of elderly patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed 1264 elderly patients (aged 38 years or older) who underwent FET at three reproductive centers between 2015 and 2017. According to the endometrial preparation protocol, we divided the patients into a GnRHa combined with hormone replacement treatment (GnRHa-HRT) group and traditional hormone replacement treatment (HRT) group. The clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and abortion rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

One-way analysis of variance of the two groups revealed no significant difference in the clinical (33.58% vs. 37.15%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (19.40% vs. 25.10%) between the GnRHa-HRT and HRT groups. The live birth rate (17.54% vs. 24.10% p = 0.0229) of the GnRHa-HRT group was lower than that of the HRT group, whereas the abortion rate (45.56% vs. 32.97% p = 0.0252) was higher than that of the HRT group. However, multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in the live birth rate (p = 0.1333) or abortion rate (p = 0.1881) between the GnRHa-HRT and HRT groups. The number of embryos transferred, level of the embryo, and age and ovarian reserve of the patient significantly affected final reproductive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A GnRH agonist combined with hormone replacement therapy did not improve the reproductive outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo cycles in elderly patients.

Unmasking catamenial hemoptysis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES) is a rare condition that occurs in women when endometriosis implants into the thoracic cavity. Catamenial hemoptysis, the occurrence of hemoptysis with menstruation, is a recognized clinical manifestation of TES commonly treated with hormonal therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

We present the first documented case describing the recrudescence of catamenial hemoptysis in the setting of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor administration in a 25-year-old woman with cystic fibrosis (CF).

DISCUSSION

We review the literature on TES, pharmacologic management, and reported cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drug interactions. We propose that our patient's recrudescence of catamenial hemoptysis was secondary to a drug-drug interaction between Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor and oral contraceptive therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our case suggests that women with CF who have catamenial hemoptysis and a genetic mutation approved for Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor or Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor can be managed effectively with either CFTR modulator and hormonal contraceptive therapy.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation in a patient undergoing random start ovarian stimulation for egg-donation cycle with an inadvertent concomitant early pregnancy

We report the first case of OHSS following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation in random start ovarian stimulation for egg-donation cycles during inadvertent concomitant early pregnancy. As an additional note, the sustained activity exerted by the increasing endogenous hCG production seemed to be responsible for the suboptimal performance in terms of oocyte yield in the current case. OHSS can occur in random-start stimulations protocols even after the use of a GnRH agonist for triggering in case of concomitant unnoticed early pregnancy especially if stimulation is commenced in the periovulatory/luteal phase. The present case report introduces a note of extreme caution when proceeding with this protocol in an otherwise fertile population (egg-donors, elective or oncologic oocyte cryopreservation).

Growth hormone cotreatment for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) supplementation in improving the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of poor responders.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Poor ovarian responders undergoing conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of poor ovarian responders undergoing a single IVF/ICSI cycle with GH supplementation versus conventional controlled ovarian stimulation. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database before starting data extraction (CRD42020151681).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome was live birth rate. Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, number of oocytes, number of mature (metaphase II [MII]) oocytes and the number of embryos available to transfer were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULT(S)

Twelve RCTs were included; 586 women were assigned to the intervention group and 553 to the control group. The analysis revealed that patients receiving GH supplementation did not show an increased live birth rate, miscarriage rate, or ongoing pregnancy rate. However, GH supplementation in poor responders increased clinical pregnancy rate, number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference 1.62), number of MII oocytes (mean difference 2.06), and number of embryos available to transfer (mean difference 0.76). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not provide statistical changes to pooled results.

CONCLUSION(S)

The present meta-analysis provides evidence that GH supplementation may improve some reproductive outcomes in poor responders, but not live birth rates.

Expression of genes that regulate follicle development and maturation during ovarian stimulation in poor responders

RESEARCH QUESTION

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androgen receptor (AR), LH beta polypeptide (LHB), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and progesterone receptor membrane component 2 (PGRMC2) regulate follicle development and maturation. Their mRNA expression was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of normal and poor responders, during ovarian stimulation.

DESIGN

Fifty-two normal responders and 15 poor responders according to the Bologna criteria were enrolled for IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and stimulated with 200 IU of follitrophin alpha and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist. HCG was administered for final oocyte maturation. On days 1, 6 and 10 of stimulation, blood samples were obtained, serum hormone levels were measured, RNA was extracted from PBMC and real-time polymerase chain reaction was carried out to identify the mRNA levels. Relative mRNA expression of each gene was calculated by the comparative 2^-DDCt method.

RESULTS

Differences between mRNA levels of each gene on the same time point between the two groups were not significant. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA levels were downregulated, adjusted for ovarian response and age. Positive correlations between PGRMC1 and AR (standardized beta = 0.890, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 6 and PGRMC1 and LHB (standardized beta = 0.806, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 10 were found in poor responders. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 were positively correlated on days 6 and 10 in normal responders.

CONCLUSIONS

PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA are significantly decreased during ovarian stimulation, with some potential differences between normal and poor responders.

Intramuscular injection of human chorionic gonadotropin prior to secretory transformation in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND

The major difference between a natural cycle and an artificially prepared cycle is the lack of luteinizing hormone (LH) peak in the latter. The LH/hCG receptors were identified to express in human endometrium and evidences of experiments also suggested the beneficial role of hCG in embryo implantation, indicating that the LH peak might be of clinical significance and the activation of LH/hCG receptors in the endometrium could improve embryo implantation. Hence, we postulated that the addition of hCG prior to secretory transformation in an artificial cycle might improve pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Reproductive Medicine Center between 2016 and 2018. Patients aged ≤43 years at the (index) oocyte retrieval and undergoing artificially prepared frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) with at least one good-quality embryo transferred were included. The cycles were divided into two groups: The hCG group (n = 337) received an intramuscular injection of 10,000 IU hCG before secretory transformation; the control group (n = 364) performed FET without hCG administration. The primary endpoint was live birth delivery rate (LBR), secondary outcomes included implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR).

RESULTS

The LBR (49.9% vs 39.6%, P < 0.01), CPR (61.4% vs 50.5%, P < 0.01) and OPR (52.8% vs 43.1%, P < 0.05) were statistically significantly higher in the hCG group than the control group. The superiority in LBR after hCG administration remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors (OR 1.613, 95% CI 1.173-2.217; P < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, the improvement in LBR was statistically significant after hCG administration for cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles (51.2% vs 42.3%, P < 0.05), whereas for blastocyst transfer cycles, the improvement in LBR was not (45.7% vs 31.3%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular hCG injection prior to secretory transformation may benefit LBR in patients undergoing artificially prepared FET cycles. But it should be noted that nonsignificant tendency towards higher LBR was observed after hCG administration in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer. So, future prospective randomized controlled studies are required to confirm, especially for blastocyst transfer cycles.

Treatment patterns, health resource utilization and costs among central precocious puberty patients treated with leuprolide or histrelin: an examination of the commercial and Medicaid populations

Aims: To compare treatment duration, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and direct healthcare costs between patients with central precocious puberty (CPP) treated with leuprolide or histrelin, and between patients with Medicaid or commercial insurance. This information is important as it affects treatment choice and outcomes.Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study identified commercial and Medicaid-insured CPP patients ≤12-years-old who were diagnosed between 1 January 2010 and 30 September 2014 and had ≥1 prescription for leuprolide or histrelin (first prescription = index date). Treatment patterns were measured for the duration of available data; whereas, all-cause and disease-monitoring HRU and all-cause costs were compared between treatment groups for the year following treatment initiation. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust healthcare costs for differences in baseline patient characteristics.Results: A total of 1,177 commercially-insured (907 leuprolide and 270 histrelin) and 658 Medicaid-insured (613 leuprolide and 45 histrelin) patients were identified. Mean age at treatment initiation ranged from 7.5-8.5-years-old, 11.1-20.5% of patients were male, and the mean treatment duration was over one year. Commercially-insured patients treated with histrelin used more services in general than those treated with leuprolide but had fewer office visits. Healthcare service utilization was similar between Medicaid-insured treatment groups. In both payer populations, costs were similar.Limitations: The number of Medicaid-insured patients who received a histrelin implant was low, and this may make the findings more sensitive to influence by outliers.Conclusions: Mean overall healthcare costs were similar between CPP patients treated with leuprolide and those treated with histrelin. Medicaid patients generally received less testing and were less likely to receive specialist care. Patients treated with histrelin had fewer office visits but also had a shorter overall treatment.

Gonadotropins versus oral ovarian stimulation agents for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare live birth and multiple gestation in patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation (OS-IUI) with oral medications versus gonadotropins.

DESIGN

Systemic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing OS-IUI for treatment of unexplained infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Clomiphene, letrozole, or gonadotropins for OS-IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth and multiple gestation.

RESULT(S)

Eight total trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria and comprised 2,989 patients undergoing 6,590 cycles. One study reported a significant increase in both live births and multiple gestations with the use of gonadotropins, two studies found an increased likelihood of live birth with the use of gonadotropins, and two studies found an increased risk of twins with gonadotropins. The relative risk of live birth in subjects receiving gonadotropins was 1.09. The relative risk of multiple gestation in subjects receiving gonadotropins was 1.06. Clinical pregnancy was higher in protocols with lax cancellation policies or higher gonadotropin doses, with subsequent increased relative risks of multiple gestations of 1.20 and 1.15, respectively. Singleton births per subject were similar between the two groups. The results did not change in per-protocol, per cycle, or fixed-effect model sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION(S)

For every birth gained with the use of gonadotropins, a similar increased risk of multiple gestation occurs. The randomized data do not support the use of gonadotropin for OS-IUI in women with unexplained infertility.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Prospero CRD4201911998.

Endocrine Requirements for Oocyte Maturation Following hCG, GnRH Agonist, and Kisspeptin During IVF Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The maturation of oocytes to acquire competence for fertilization is critical to the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. It requires LH-like exposure, provided by either human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). More recently, the hypothalamic stimulator, kisspeptin, was used to mature oocytes. Herein, we examine the relationship between the endocrine changes following these agents and oocyte maturation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Prospectively collected hormonal data from 499 research IVF cycles triggered with either hCG, GnRHa, or kisspeptin were evaluated.

RESULTS

HCG-levels (121 iU/L) peaked at 24 h following hCG, whereas LH-levels peaked at ~4 h following GnRHa (140 iU/L), or kisspeptin (41 iU/L). HCG-levels were negatively associated with body-weight, whereas LH rises following GnRHa and kisspeptin were positively predicted by pre-trigger LH values. The odds of achieving the median mature oocyte yield for each trigger were increased by hCG/LH level. Progesterone rise during oocyte maturation occurred precipitously following each trigger and strongly predicted the number of mature oocytes retrieved. Progesterone rise was positively associated with the hCG-level following hCG trigger, but negatively with LH rise following all three triggers. The rise in progesterone per mature oocyte at 12 h was greater following GnRHa than following hCG or kisspeptin triggers.

CONCLUSION

The endocrine response during oocyte maturation significantly differed by each trigger. Counter-intuitively, progesterone rise during oocyte maturation was negatively associated with LH rise, even when accounting for the number of mature oocytes retrieved. These data expand our understanding of the endocrine changes during oocyte maturation and inform the design of future precision-triggering protocols.

Growth Hormone Supplementation May Not Improve Live Birth Rate in Poor Responders

Backgrounds: Growth hormone (GH) was used for many years to increase ovarian response in poor ovarian responders (PORs). Although meta-analysis suggested that GH therapy improve early clinical outcomes, the benefit of GH usage on chance of live birth was still widely debated. This study was to determine whether or not GH supplementation influences the live birth rate (LBR). Methods: A total of 3,080 expected PORs receiving and not receiving (control) GH adjuvant therapy at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2017 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The basal characteristics of patients were compared using analysis of variance (continuous variables) and categorical variables were evaluated with a chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential associations of LBR with GH treatment while adjusting other confounding factors. Results: No statistically significant differences existed in miscarriage rate (5.3 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.076) and LBR (37.7 vs. 34.5%; p = 0.426) in young expected PORs (< 35 years of age). Moreover, no significant differences existed in the miscarriage rate (25.6 vs. 23.3%; p = 0.681), and LBR (17.8 vs. 17.9%; p = 0.977) in the old expected PORs (≥35 years of age). Logistic regression suggested that GH adjuvant therapy did not improve the LBR in young (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.88-1.85; p = 0.203) and elderly expected PORs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.82-1.76; p = 0.342), while GH was not associated with risk of miscarriage in young (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11-1.24; p = 0.108) and elderly expected PORs (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.43-1.93; p = 0.813). In subgroup analysis, GH treatment significantly increased the day 3 embryos available rate in the subgroup of young PORs with the long down-regulation (63.11 vs. 49.35%; p = 0.004), while significantly reduced the risk of miscarriage in the subgroup of young PORs with GnRH antagonist protocol (0.00 vs. 12. %; p = 0.023). There was no significant difference for LBR in PORs with GnRH antagonist (<35 years [35.19 vs. 28.45%; p = 0.183]; ≥35 years [12.96 vs. 14.03%; p = 0.707]), GnRH-a long (<35 years [33.33 vs. 36.99%; p = 0.597]; ≥35 years [17.44 vs. 20.28%; p = 0.574]) and long down-regulation (<35 years [58.82 vs. 41.90%; p = 0.193]; ≥35 years [43.33 vs. 25.30%; p = 0.065]). Conclusions: Growth hormone treatment may not improve live birth rate in expected poor responders.

Comparison of endometrial receptivity of clomiphene citrate versus letrozole in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled study

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole on endometrial receptivity for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A randomized controlled study included 160 patients diagnosed with PCOS, out of which 80 patients received 50 mg of CC and 80 patients received 2.5 mg of letrozole for successful ovulation induction. Endometrial thickness and pattern, the blood flow of uterine artery and subendometrial region, endometrial volume and vascularization index were measured. The ratio of multilayered endometrial pattern in letrozole group was significantly increased on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration compared with CC group (77.5% vs. 55.0%). The volume, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) of endometrium on the day of hCG administration and 7-9 days after ovulation in letrozole group were significantly increased. The biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate in letrozole group were significantly increased compared with CC group (36.3%, 30.0%, 22.5% vs. 21.3%, 13.8%, 10.0%, respectively). Letrozole increased pregnancy rates by improving endometrial receptivity compared with CC in patients with PCOS.

Do poor-responder patients undergoing IVF benefit from splitting and increasing the daily gonadotropin dose?

We aim to retrospectively evaluate the role of increasing the gonadotropin daily dose from 450 IU/day to 300 IU twice a day on IVF-ET outcome in poor responder patients. All consecutive women admitted to our IVF unit and underwent COH consisting of daily gonadotropin dose of 450 IU, followed by an IVF cycle using 300 IU twice a day, were included. Ovarian stimulation characteristics, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryo transferred and pregnancy rate was assessed. Twenty-three patients undergoing both cycles were evaluated. While there was no between-group difference in the duration of COH, number of 2PN embryos, fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred, patients receiving daily gonadotropin 300 IU twice a day achieved a significantly higher peak estradiol levels (3350.39 ± 2364.26 vs. 2223.74 ± 1299.91; p < .03, respectively), and yielded significantly higher number of follicles >15 mm in diameter on day of hCG administration (3.2 ± 2.4 vs 1.8 ± 1; p < .03, respectively) and higher number of oocytes retrieved (3.48 ± 2.54 vs 1.87 ± 1.1; p < .02, respectively) with an acceptable live birth rate (5%). To conclude, in poor responders undergoing COH a daily gonadotropin dose of 450 IU, increasing the dose to 300 IU twice daily may result in higher oocyte yield, with the possible improvement in IVF outcome.

A novel semen supplement (SuinFort) improves sow fertility after artificial insemination

The objective of this study was to determine effects of a novel seminal supplement, SuinFort, on fertility of multiparous sows. For 2 years, a total of 1159 sows were assigned to be artificial inseminated (AI) either with semen supplemented with the additive (2 IU oxytocin, 5 μg lecirelin, 2 mM caffeine, n = 830 AI) or with no supplementation (Control, n = 2422 AI). The supplement was included 15 min before insemination. Supplementation with SuinFort resulted in greater fertility both by increasing farrowing rate 87.2% ± 0.7 to 90.7% ± 1.0 (P <  0.001) and litter size from 13.8 ± 0.1 to 14.4 ± 0.1 (P <  0.001). To test if there was a direct effect of SuinFort on spermatozoa, an in vitro experiment was conducted using semen doses from 10 boars. Semen was stored at 15 °C and on days 1, 2 and 3 were aliquoted to a control and SuinFort-supplemented group, incubated at 37 °C and analyzed for sperm quality at 15 min and 2 h. For aliquots with SuinFort, there was a small decrease in semen quality. In conclusion, the administration of a combination of oxytocin, lecirelin and caffeine to boar semen 15 min prior to AI, positively affects sow fertility. Considering that in vitro effects on sperm quality were small, it is likely that SuinFort affects fertility by modulating uterine function. Supplementation of semen with SuinFort, therefore, has potential for increasing pork production efficiency as a result of increased reproductive efficiency after AI of sows.

Evaluation of estrous synchronization protocols on ewe reproductive efficiency and profitability

A 2-year experiment was conducted to determine the effect of a single injection of prostaglandin after initiation of the breeding season on ewe estrous synchronization. Rambouillet ewes (n = 101; Year 1 = 52; Year 2 = 49) assigned to one of three treatments: untreated (CON); 12-d CIDR insert (CIDR); or 1 injection of prostaglandin at d 2.5 (1 PG) after rams were placed with ewes. Rams were placed with ewes at the time of CIDR removal (d 0) and remained with ewes during a 35-d breeding season. Both the CIDR- (94%) and 1 PG (73.5%) treatment groups had a larger number (P ≤ 0.01) of ewes bred in the first 5 d of the breeding season compared to ewes of the control (33%) group. As expected, CIDR-treated ewes had a shorter time to mating, than 1 PG-treated ewes and ewes of the control group had a longer interval to mating than both CIDR- and 1 PG-treated ewes (P ≤ 0.01). The number of lambs born per ewe and kg of lamb weaned per ewe was not different (P ≥ 0.31) among treatment groups. Additionally, there was no difference (P =  0.78) in net profit per ewe among treatment groups. Based on these data, utilizing a single injection of PG 2.5 d after initiation of the breeding season resulted in similar pregnancy rates at d 5 of the breeding season when compared with CIDR-treated ewes indicating the potential utilization of the 1PG protocol in a confinement setting as a viable method for estrous synchronization.

Does double trigger (GnRH-agonist + hCG) improve outcome in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET cycle? A pilot study

Many strategies are offered for the treatment of poor responders. However, no compelling advantage for one stimulation protocol over another has been hitherto established. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of different modes and timings of final follicular maturation trigger, on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcome of poor responder patients. In the present randomized controlled study, poor responder patients, according to the Bologna criteria, undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol were randomly assigned to three different final follicular maturation trigger modes and timings: hCG 36 h before oocyte pick-up (OPU) (hCG trigger); GnRH agonist (GnRHag) 36 h before (OPU) and hCG on day of OPU (GnRHag trigger); and GnRHag and hCG, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger). Pregnancy rate, number of oocytes, and top quality embryos (TQEs). Thirty-three poor responder patients were recruited and randomized to the different study groups. While there were no in-between groups' differences in patients' demographics and stimulation variables, patients in the double trigger group had a significantly higher number of TQE (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.3 ± 0.8 and 0.5 + 0.7; p<.02) as compared to the hCG trigger and the GnRH-ag trigger groups, respectively, with an acceptable pregnancy rate. Double trigger offers an additional benefit to poor responder patients. Larger studies are required to support this new concept prior to its implementation to IVF practice.

A cohort study of both human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone addition at early follicular stage in in vitro fertilization outcome: A STROBE-compliant study

At present, the precise role of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation at an early time of follicular phase on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes remains uncertain.Here infertile women of normal ovarian function undergoing their first cycle of IVF/ICSI were studied and were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1, ovarian stimulation with 150IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone. Group 2, patients received 75IU rFSH and 75IU HMG. Group 3 patients were given 150IU rFSH and 75IU rLH.There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics, ovarian response, the biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 groups. No significant differences were found in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the patients whose LH levels were lower than 0.75 mIU/ml and those above this threshold in group 1. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 group patients whose LH level lower than 0.75 mIU/ml.The results showed that either the addition of HMG or rLH supplementation at an early time of follicular phase produce no significant benefit on IVF outcome in patients with normal ovarian function.

Luteal support with vaginal dydrogesterone increases pregnancy rate in patients with clomifene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome receiving letrozole for ovulation induction

A prospective observational study was conducted on 186 patients with clomifene citrate (CC)-resistant polycytic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who were allocated into two treatment arms for three months; letrozole alone (n = 92) and letrozole with luteal support using vaginal dydrogestrone (n = 94). Patients received luteal support experienced significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate than those who received letrozole alone (48.9% vs. 23.9%, respectively). Luteal support in letrozole treated CC-resistant PCOS significantly improves pregnancy rate and should be implemented in ovulation induction regimens.

Management of recurrent implantation failure by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and aromatase inhibitor suppression, in women without evidence of endometriosis

Endometriosis is common among those with infertility, although many cases go undiagnosed. This study was performed to determine whether empiric treatment with two months of depo-leuprolide 3.75 mg monthly (dep-GnRH-ag) and letrozole 5 mg daily improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with at least two unexplained failed embryo transfers (ETs) but without a previous diagnosis of endometriosis. A retrospective cohort study was performed with subjects who failed at least two good quality ET. The study excluded women with a known history of endometriosis or ovarian cysts (possible endometriomas). Subjects (N = 38) were treated with dep-GnRH-ag and letrozole pre-cycle. Matched women (N = 37) who did not receive either pretreatment served as a control group. Data were compared by non-paired T-tests and multivariate logistic regression to control for confounding effects. Demographic data, hormonal profiles, and ovarian reserve parameters were similar between the two groups. The treated group had failed more embryo transfers (3.5 ± 1.7 vs. 2.0 ± 1.3, p = .01) than the controls. When adjusting for the number of MII oocytes collected, number of blastocysts developed and number of blastocysts transferred, there were more pregnancies (24/38 vs. 11/37, p = .02) and ongoing pregnancies (18/38 vs. 9/37, p = .03) in the treated group. Patients with multiple unexplained failed ET may have undiagnosed endometriosis and may benefit from pretreatment with dep-GnRH-ag and letrozole. These results would benefit from being subjected to a randomized prospective study.

Gonadotrophins versus clomiphene citrate with or without IUI in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and clomiphene failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Are six cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins more cost-effective than six cycles of ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate (CC) with or without IUI in normogonadotropic anovulatory women not pregnant after six ovulatory cycles with CC?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Both gonadotrophins and IUI are more expensive when compared with CC and intercourse, and gonadotrophins are more effective than CC.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In women with normogonadotropic anovulation who ovulate but do not conceive after six cycles with CC, medication is usually switched to gonadotrophins, with or without IUI. The cost-effectiveness of these changes in policy is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We performed an economic evaluation of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins compared with CC with or without IUI in a two-by-two factorial multicentre randomized controlled trial in normogonadotropic anovulatory women not pregnant after six ovulatory cycles with CC. Between December 2008 and December 2015 women were allocated to six cycles with gonadotrophins plus IUI, six cycles with gonadotrophins plus intercourse, six cycles with CC plus IUI or six cycles with CC plus intercourse. The primary outcome was conception leading to a live birth achieved within 8 months of randomization.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on direct medical costs. We calculated the direct medical costs of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins versus CC and of IUI versus intercourse in six subsequent cycles. We included costs of medication, cycle monitoring, interventions, and pregnancy leading to live birth. Resource use was collected from the case report forms and unit costs were derived from various sources. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for gonadotrophins compared to CC and for IUI compared to intercourse. We used non-parametric bootstrap resampling to investigate the effect of uncertainty in our estimates. The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We allocated 666 women in total to gonadotrophins and IUI (n = 166), gonadotrophins and intercourse (n = 165), CC and IUI (n = 163), or CC and intercourse (n = 172). Mean direct medical costs per woman receiving gonadotrophins or CC were €4495 versus €3006 (cost difference of €1475 (95% CI: €1457-€1493)). Live birth rates were 52% in women allocated to gonadotrophins and 41% in those allocated to CC (relative risk (RR) 1.24:95% CI: 1.05-1.46). The ICER was €15 258 (95% CI: €8721 to €63 654) per additional live birth with gonadotrophins. Mean direct medical costs per woman allocated to IUI or intercourse were €4497 versus €3005 (cost difference of €1510 (95% CI: €1492-€1529)). Live birth rates were 49% in women allocated to IUI and 43% in those allocated to intercourse (RR = 1.14:95% CI: 0.97-1.35). The ICER was €24 361 (95% CI: €-11 290 to €85 172) per additional live birth with IUI.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

We allowed participating hospitals to use their local protocols for ovulation induction and IUI, which may have led to variation in costs, but which increases generalizability. Indirect costs generated by transportation or productivity loss were not included. We did not evaluate letrozole, which is potentially more effective than CC.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Gonadotrophins are more effective, but more expensive than CC, therefore, the use of gonadotrophins in women with normogonadotropic anovulation who have not conceived after six ovulatory CC cycles depends on society's willingness to pay for an additional child. In view of the uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimate of IUI, these data are not sufficient to make recommendations on the use of IUI in these women. In countries where ovulation induction regimens are reimbursed, policy makers and health care professionals may use our results in their guidelines.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This trial was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). The Eudract number for this trial is 2008-006171-73. The Sponsor's Protocol Code Number is P08-40. CBLA reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. BWM is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva and Guerbet.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR1449.

Relationship between seasons and pregnancy rates during intrauterine insemination. A historical cohort

BACKGROUND

The underlying cause of seasonal infertility in humans is unclear, but is likely to be -multifactorial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare the pregnancy rates among infertile women who underwent induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) with the season in which the fertility treatment was performed.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 466 patients who were treated in the reproductive endocrinology and infertility outpatient clinic of a tertiary-level women's healthcare and maternity hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective demographic, hormonal and ultrasonographic data were obtained from the patients' medical records. Clomiphene citrate or gonadotropin medications were used for induced ovulation. The patients were divided into four groups according to the season (spring, winter, autumn and summer) in which fertility treatment was received. Clinical pregnancy rates were calculated and compared between these four groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the seasonal groups in terms of age, infertility type, ovarian reserve tests, duration of infertility, medications used or length of stimulation. A total of 337 patients (72.3%) were treated with clomiphene citrate and 129 (27.7%) with gonadotropin; no significant difference between these two groups was observed. The clinical pregnancy rates for the spring, winter, autumn and summer groups were 15.6% (n = 24), 8.6% (n = 9), 11.5% (n = 13) and 7.4% (n = 7), respectively (P = 0.174).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the spring group had the highest pregnancy rate, the rates of successful IUI did not differ significantly between the seasonal groups.

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of recombinant human LH (r-hLH) supplementation in ovarian stimulation for ART in specific subgroups of patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Centers for reproductive care.

PATIENT(S)

Six populations were investigated: 1) women with a hyporesponse to recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) monotherapy; 2) women at an advanced reproductive age; 3) women cotreated with the use of a GnRH antagonist; 4) women with profoundly suppressed LH levels after the administration of GnRH agonists; 5) normoresponder women to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; and 6) women with a "poor response" to ovarian stimulation, including those who met the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Bologna criteria.

INTERVENTION(S)

Systematic review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, fertilization rate, and number of metaphase II oocytes.

RESULT(S)

Recombinant hLH supplementation appears to be beneficial in two subgroups of patients: 1) women with adequate prestimulation ovarian reserve parameters and an unexpected hyporesponse to r-hFSH monotherapy; and 2) women 36-39 years of age. Indeed, there is no evidence that r-hLH is beneficial in young (<35 y) normoresponders cotreated with the use of a GnRH antagonist. The use of r-hLH supplementation in women with suppressed endogenous LH levels caused by GnRH analogues and in poor responders remains controversial, whereas the use of r-hLH supplementation to prevent the development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome warrants further investigation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Recombinant hLH can be proposed for hyporesponders and women 36-39 years of age.

A randomized controlled trial comparing lifestyle intervention to letrozole for ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects between 8 and 18% of women and is the leading cause of female anovulatory infertility. Unfortunately, common treatments for women trying to conceive can be ineffective as well as disruptive or harmful to patients' quality of life. Despite evidence that women with PCOS have expressed the need for alternative fertility treatments, lifestyle interventions incorporating a nutritional plan with supplementation, increased physical activity, and techniques for stress management have not been combined as a program and studied in this population. Literature suggests that each of these individual components can positively influence reproductive hormones and metabolic health.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a randomized controlled trial which will include 240 women diagnosed with PCOS, according to the Rotterdam criteria, who are trying to conceive. Participants will be randomized to either a comprehensive lifestyle intervention program or prescribed an oral fertility medication, letrozole. These two groups will be further randomized to consume either myo-inositol or a placebo. Participants will be between the ages of 18 and 37 years. Exclusion criteria include women who have already begun fertility treatment, who are currently using myo-inositol or have taken it within the past 3 months, or who are being treated for, or have a history of, an eating disorder. The primary outcome will be the ovulation rate, the secondary outcome will be conception. Other outcomes include miscarriage rates, validated rating measures of overall quality of life (including social, relational, mind/body and emotional sub-categories) and mental health scores (depression, anxiety, and stress).

DISCUSSION

This trial will determine the effectiveness of a structured lifestyle-based comprehensive intervention program for women with PCOS experiencing infertility. In addition, it will determine whether supplementing with myo-inositol provides any further benefit. The objective of this study is to assess a possible non-pharmacological solution to ovulatory dysfunction in these patients and perhaps improve other associated features of PCOS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02630485 . Registered on 15 December 2015.

An estrogen antagonist, cyclofenil, has anti-dengue-virus activity

Dengue virus (DENV) infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in tropical and subtropical areas. Several compounds that act against DENV have been studied in clinical trials to date; however, there have been no compounds identified that are effective in reducing the severity of the clinical manifestations. To explore anti-DENV drugs, we examined small molecules that interact with DENV NS1 and inhibit DENV replication. Cyclofenil, which is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and has been used clinically as an ovulation-inducing drug, showed an inhibitory effect on DENV replication in mammalian cells but not in mosquito cells. Other SERMs also inhibited DENV replication in mammalian cells, but cyclofenil showed the weakest cytotoxicity among these SERMs. Cyclofenil also inhibited the replication of Zika virus. A time-of-addition assay suggested that cyclofenil may interfere with two stages of the DENV life cycle: the translation-RNA synthesis and assembly-maturation stages. However, the level of intracellular infectious particles decreased more drastically after treatment with cyclofenil than the viral RNA level did, indicating that the assembly-maturation stage might be the main target of cyclofenil. In electron microscopy analysis, many aggregated particles were detected in DENV-infected cells in the presence of cyclofenil, supporting the possibility that cyclofenil impedes the process of assembly and maturation of DENV.

Modified hMG stimulated: an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with normal menstrual cycles

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) stimulated, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), natural cycling and letrozole ovulation induction during endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in patients with normal menstrual cycles. This retrospective analysis included a total of 5070 cycles of patients with normal menstrual patterns who underwent FET between October 2009 and September 2015. The patients were divided into four groups according to the method of endometrial preparation for FET: 1838 cycles were natural, 1666 underwent HRT, 340 underwent letrozole ovulation induction and 1226 underwent modified hMG stimulated. Reproduction-related clinical outcomes in the four groups were compared. The clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates of patients in the modified hMG stimulated group were significantly higher than that in the other groups p < .05. While abortion rates were not significantly different among all four groups (all p >.05). Modified hMG stimulated resulted in a higher pregnancy rate compared to the other treatment groups. Therefore, modified hMG stimulated may be an effective option in endometrial preparation for FET in patients with normal menstrual cycles.

Progesterone for preparation of the endometrium for frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective study on patients' opinions on a new subcutaneous formulation

We aimed to evaluate patients' perspectives on a progesterone subcutaneous formulation for endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. In this prospective study, women with at least one experience with vaginal progesterone, undergone endometrial preparation with oral estradiol valerate and daily subcutaneous progesterone administered from the fifth day before the transfer until the day of the beta-hCG test. Patients completed three questionnaires, at enrollment (Q1), for gathering information on the experience with vaginal treatment and expectations about the subcutaneous route and then at the time of the transfer (Q2) and eight days later (Q3). Main outcome measures were patients' opinions on comfort, ease of use, convenience, overall satisfaction, level of anxiety and pain associated with the administration of subcutaneous progesterone in comparison with their previous experience. Sixty-nine women completed the questionnaires. All vaginal versus subcutaneous comparisons were significantly in favor of the subcutaneous route. When comparing patients' expectations at Q1 with patients' opinions at Q2 and Q3, all evaluations, except for one, demonstrated that the patient's positive expectation was confirmed after 5 and 13 days of treatment. In conclusion, in women with previous experience with vaginal progesterone, the subcutaneous route was associated with significantly increased acceptance.