Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inhaled long-acting beta2 agonists improve lung function and health status in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whereas inhaled corticosteroids reduce the frequency of acute episodes of symptom exacerbation and delay deterioration in health status. We postulated that a combination of these treatments would be better than each component used alone.

METHODS

1465 patients with COPD were recruited from outpatient departments in 25 countries. They were treated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with either 50 microg salmeterol twice daily (n=372), 500 microg fluticasone twice daily (n=374), 50 microg salmeterol and 500 microg fluticasone twice daily (n=358), or placebo (n=361) for 12 months. The primary outcome was the pretreatment forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) after 12 months treatment' and after patients had abstained from all bronchodilators for at least 6h and from study medication for at least 12h. Secondary outcomes were other lung function measurements, symptoms and rescue treatment use, the number of exacerbations, patient withdrawals, and disease-specific health status. We assessed adverse events, serum cortisol concentrations, skin bruising, and electrocardiograms. Analysis was as predefined in the study protocol.

FINDINGS

All active treatments improved lung function, symptoms, and health status and reduced use of rescue medication and frequency of exacerbations. Combination therapy improved pretreatment FEV1 significantly more than did placebo (treatment difference 133 mL, 95% CI 105-161, p<0.0001), salmeterol (73 mL, 46-101, p<0.0001), or fluticasone alone (95 mL, 67-122, p<0.0001). Combination treatment produced a clinically significant improvement in health status and the greatest reduction in daily symptoms. All treatments were well tolerated with no difference in the frequency of adverse events, bruising, or clinically significant falls in serum cortisol concentration.

INTERPRETATION

Because inhaled long-acting beta2 agonists and corticosteroid combination treatment produces better control of symptoms and lung function, with no greater risk of side-effects than that with use of either component alone, this combination treatment should be considered for patients with COPD.

Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial

Dyspnoea is a primary symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The baseline (BDI) and transition (TDI) dyspnoea indices are commonly used instruments to assess breathlessness and the impact of intervention. Its validity and pattern of response in multinational clinical trials has not been established. In a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 997 COPD patients who received tiotropium, salmeterol or placebo, in addition to usual care, the validity and pattern of response of the BDI and TDI were examined. The BDI was significantly correlated with the dyspnoea diary (DD) score and the symptom and activity components of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), establishing concurrent validity. Furthermore, the TDI was also correlated with the changes in DD, SGRQ symptom and activity scores. Construct validity was established by the association between baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and BDI and AFEVI with TDI. Physician's global evaluation (PGE) was significantly associated with BDI as well as APGE with TDI. Significant correlations have also been observed when the cohorts were classified according to native English and native non-English speaking countries. A change in PGE of 1 category (i.e. 2 units on an 8-point scale) was associated with a mean TDI of approximately 1 unit (0.9-1.3 mean focal score), lending further support to the clinical significance of this change inherent in the instrument's descriptors. TDI responders (i.e. focal score < or = 1 unit) used less supplemental salbutamol, had fewer exacerbations and had significantly improved health status as measured by impacts and total SGRQ scores compared with nonresponders. In conclusion, the transition dyspnoea index is a valid instrument when used in a multinational clinical trial and the patterns of response confirm a 1-unit change in the transition dyspnoea index focal score as being clinically important.

Tiotropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In 2001, we concluded that patients with symptoms of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) inadequately controlled by an 'as-required' inhaled short-acting beta 2 agonist can be helped by regular use of an inhaled antimuscarinic bronchodilator or a long-acting beta 2 agonist. Since then, a new antimuscarinic drug [symbol: see text] tiotropium bromide (Spiriva--Pfizer/Boehringer Ingelheim) has been licensed as a once-daily bronchodilator for maintenance treatment of COPD in people aged 18 years or over. Here, we review the evidence for efficacy of tiotropium and discuss its role in the maintenance treatment of COPD.

Creatininuria in asthmatic children treated with a combination of glucocorticoid and beta-agonist

We examined whether a combination of glucocorticoids and beta-agonists inhaled by asthmatics had an influence on the metabolism of L-arginine, an amino acid involved in the production of urea, creatinine, and NO that is known to play a significant role in asthma. After lung function tests, we assayed nitrates, urea, and creatinine and determined urinary osmolality in urine samples taken from groups of 129 children (10+/-3 years old) with mild-to-moderate asthma treated with different regimens of drugs. No significant differences in urinary urea levels were noted between the groups. On the other hand, the children treated by the combination of glucocorticoid and beta-agonist (n = 52) had a higher level of urinary creatinine (+40%, P < .001, and a higher creatinine/urea ratio (C/U) expressed as % mass= 5.98 +/- 2.44, P < .001) than did the untreated children (n = 43, C/U = 4.03 +/- 1.24), those treated with glucocorticoid (n = 23, C/U = 4.01 +/- 1.32) or beta-agonist alone (n = 11, C/U = 4.09 +/- 1.01) or control children of the same age (n = 20, C/U = 4.81 +/- .90). Children treated with beta-agonist alone had the lowest mean levels of urinary nitrates (P < .05). The children in group 1 whose C/U ratio was above 6 (n = 24) had a higher FVC (P < .02) and FEV1 (not significant (NS)). However, an overly high C/U may also be indicative of a deleterious influence on the biosynthesis of NO from arginine. Further investigations will be required to determine whether there is a relationship between C/U ratios and lung function parameters, and whether the urinary C/U ratio could be employed as a simple and noninvasive parameter for assessment of treatment in asthmatics.

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma

Asthma guidelines recommend an inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist (beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist) as the preferred maintenance therapy for moderate and severe persistent asthma. Advair/Seretide Diskus also registered as Accuhaler is fixed-dose salmeterol (a long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist) and fluticasone propionate (a corticosteroid) administered via a single powder inhalation device. The clinical effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma symptoms has been established in comparative clinical trials. Pharmacoeconomic analyses, based on data from these clinical trials, have been conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in various countries. In patients with asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was associated with more favourable (lower) cost-effectiveness ratios than fluticasone propionate monotherapy, oral montelukast plus inhaled fluticasone propionate, inhaled budesonide, and inhaled formoterol plus budesonide. As the initial maintenance therapy in patients with persistent asthma symptoms while receiving short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was cost effective relative to montelukast monotherapy. Although the total cost of asthma management tended to be slightly higher with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with fluticasone propionate or montelukast monotherapy, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate consistently had a more favourable cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of per successfully treated week or symptom-free day and/or was associated with small incremental costs to achieve significant additional clinical benefits. In clinical practice, salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate was associated with lower asthma-related costs than treatment with other maintenance therapies.In patients with asthma symptoms despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produced clinically meaningful improvements in overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores relative to salmeterol or placebo monotherapy, in emotional function domain scores relative to fluticasone propionate or budesonide, and in asthma symptoms domain scores relative to budesonide. In patients with persistent asthma symptoms while receiving short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produced clinically meaningful improvements in overall AQLQ scores compared with fluticasone propionate or montelukast.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacoeconomic analyses indicate that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate administered via a single inhaler represents a cost-effective treatment option (relative to fluticasone propionate at the same nominal dosage, budesonide, formoterol plus budesonide and montelukast plus fluticasone propionate) in patients with asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In patients with asthma not controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a cost effective treatment relative to monotherapy with montelukast. Importantly, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is also associated with improvements in health-related quality of life.

Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnoea at rest in COPD

It has been shown that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) develop dynamic hyperinflation (DH), which contributes to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium have been recommended for maintenance therapy in COPD patients, but their effect on DH has only been assessed for salmeterol. The aim of the present study was to compare the acute effect of four inhaled bronchodilators (salbutamol, formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium) and placebo on forced expiratory volume in one second, inspiratory capacity, forced vital capacity and dyspnoea in COPD patients. A cross-over, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 20 COPD patients. Patients underwent pulmonary function testing and dyspnoea evaluation, in basal condition and 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after bronchodilator or placebo administration. The results indicate that in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with decreased baseline inspiratory capacity, there was a much greater increase of inspiratory capacity after bronchodilator administration, which correlated closely with the improvement of dyspnoea sensation at rest. For all bronchodilators used, inspiratory capacity reversibility should be tested at 30 min following the bronchodilator. On average, formoterol elicited the greatest increase in inspiratory capacity than the other bronchodilators used, though the difference was significant only with salmeterol and oxitropium. The potential advantage of formoterol needs to be tested in a larger patient population.

Long acting beta-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Theophylline and long acting beta-2 agonists are bronchodilators used for the management of persistent asthma symptoms, especially nocturnal asthma. They represent different classes of drug with differing side-effect profiles.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative efficacy, safety and side-effects of long-acting beta-2 agonists and theophylline in the maintenance treatment of asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised, controlled trials (RCTs) were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group register. The register was searched using the following terms: asthma and theophylline and long acting beta-agonist or formoterol or foradile or eformoterol or salmeterol or bambuterol or bitolterol. Date of last search was April 2003. Titles and abstracts were then screened to identify potentially relevant studies. The bibliography of each RCT was searched for additional RCTs. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other relevant published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All included studies were RCTs involving adults and children with clinical evidence of asthma. These studies must have compared oral sustained release and/or dose adjusted theophylline with an inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonist.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Potentially relevant trials, identified by screening titles and/or abstracts, were obtained. Two reviewers independently assessed full text versions of these trials to decide whether the trial should be included in the review, and assessed its methodological quality. Where there was disagreement between reviewers, this was resolved by consensus, or reference to a third party. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by simple agreement. Study authors were contacted to clarify randomisation methods, provide missing data, verify the data extracted and identify unpublished studies. Relevant pharmaceutical manufacturers were also contacted.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials originally met the inclusion criteria. Five used salmeterol and one, bitolterol. In an updated version of the review, six more trials were included. Four trials used salmeterol and two used formoterol. They were of varying quality. Salmeterol improved FEV1 significantly more than theophylline in five studies and salmeterol use was associated with significantly more symptom free nights in all the studies comparing these agents. Formoterol, used in two studies was reported to be as effective as theophylline. Bitolterol, used in only one study, was reported to be less effective than theophylline. Subjects taking salmeterol experienced fewer adverse events than those using theophylline (Parallel studies: Relative Risk 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.63), Risk Difference -0.11 (95%CI: -0.16 to -0.07), NNT 9 (6, 14). Significant reductions were reported for central nervous system adverse events (Relative Risk 0.50; 95%Confidence Intervals 0.29, 0.86), Risk Difference -0.07(95% CI -0.12, -0.02), NNT 14(8, 50) and gastrointestinal adverse events (Relative Risk 0.30; 95%Confidence Intervals 0.17, 0.55), Risk Difference -0.11(-0.16, -0.06), NNT 9(6, 16).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting beta-2 agonists are at least as effective than theophylline in reducing asthma symptoms including night waking and improving lung function. Fewer adverse events occurred in subjects using long-acting beta-2 agonists(salmeterol and formoterol) as compared to theophylline.

Combined corticosteroid and longacting beta-agonist in one inhaler for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have been recommended in guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, they have only been available until recently via separate administration. They have been developed in order to facilitate adherence to medication regimens, and to improve efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of combined inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist preparations in the treatment of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials register (March 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), LILACS (all years to March 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised, with adequate blinding procedures in place. Studies could compare a combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonist preparation with either component preparation or placebo. Studies comparing different members of each class of combined therapies were included

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised trials with 2986 participants were included. Two different combination preparations (fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol) were studied in the trials. No meta-analysis on clinical outcomes was possible due to different outcome assessment across studies. All studies demonstrated a reduction in exacerbation rates versus placebo. Budesonide/formoterol was more effective than formoterol in reducing exacerbations in one study from 1.84 to 1.42 exacerbations per year. Fluticasone/salmeterol did not significantly reduce exacerbations compared with either of its component treatments. Fluticasone/salmeterol led to better quality of life compared with placebo (two studies), although there were conflicting results when compared with inhaled corticosteroid alone (two studies). There was no significant difference between fluticasone/salmeterol and long-acting beta-agonist (two studies). Budesonide/formoterol led to statistically significant differences in quality of life compared with placebo, but not when compared with component inhaled corticosteroid or beta-agonist (one study).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

For the primary outcome of exacerbations, budesonide/formoterol had a modest advantage over a component medication, formoterol, in a single trial, but fluticasone/salmeterol did not result in a significant reduction in exacerbations compared to either of its components. The combination of steroids and long-acting beta-agonist in one inhaler was effective in improving symptoms compared with placebo and on certain clinical outcomes compared with one of the individual components alone. In order to draw firmer conclusions about the effects of combination therapy in a single inhaler more data are necessary, including the assessment of the comparative effects with separate administration of the two drugs in double-dummy trials.

Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS).

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of long acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2002. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty five studies met the inclusion criteria, 56 parallel group and 29 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 60 studies and formoterol fumarate in 25. The treatment period was two to four weeks in 32 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 53 studies. 34 study groups used concurrent inhaled corticosteroid treatment, 21 studies did not permit their use and 35 permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. There were significant advantages to long acting beta-2 agonist treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (weighted mean difference (WMD) 26.78 L/min 95%CI 20.36 to 33.20), evening PEF (WMD 19.17 L/min 95%CI 11.63 to 26.73). They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. The risk of exacerbation was lower in adults using regular inhaled corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting beta-2 agonists are effective in the control of chronic asthma, and the evidence supports their use in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, as emphasised in current guidelines. Further research is needed on their use in children under 12 and in mild asthmatics not taking ICS.

Steroid-sparing effects of fluticasone propionate 100 microg and salmeterol 50 microg administered twice daily in a single product in patients previously controlled with fluticasone propionate 250 microg administered twice daily

BACKGROUND

Concurrent use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist provides better overall asthma control than the use of higher doses of ICS alone.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether fluticasone propionate (FP) combined with salmeterol in the Diskus device can be used to reduce the dose of ICS in patients currently stable on medium-dose ICS while maintaining asthma control.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12- to 24-week trial consisting of a 3-part run-in period. The run-in period was designed to first establish FP 250 microg administered twice a day (bid) via Diskus as the minimum effective dose. During run-in period 1, patients received FP 220 microg bid or the equivalent for 10 to 14 days. Controlled patients moved to run-in period 2 (5-28 days), which assessed asthma stability on FP 100 microg bid administered via Diskus. Only patients who became unstable on FP 100 microg bid were eligible to enter run-in period 3 (26-30 days), during which they were placed on FP 250 microg bid and those regaining asthma control were eligible for randomization. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained in the study with no evidence of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures included FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow, percent of symptom-free days, and daily albuterol use.

RESULTS

Only 5% of patients treated with FP100/salmeterol withdrew because of worsening asthma in the first 12 weeks; this compared with 7% in the FP250 group. All patients from a subset of sites continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; only an additional 1% of patients treated with either FP100/salmeterol or FP250 withdrew because of worsening asthma. Secondary efficacy measures confirmed primary efficacy results.

CONCLUSION

In patients requiring FP250 bid for asthma stability, FP100/salmeterol bid was steroid-sparing, allowing a 60% reduction in the FP dose while maintaining overall asthma control.

Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an economic evaluation

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with a large economic and social burden. Few economic studies have examined the benefits of inhaled therapy for patients with COPD. This 16-week study examined the cost-effectiveness of salmeterol in this patient group. Patients with a history of COPD were randomised to treatment with salmetrol 50 mcg (229 patients) or placebo (227 patients) twice daily administered by metered-dose inhaler in addition to normal therapy. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was measured and patients recorded the impact of their symptoms in a daily diary. Health status was assessed using the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire. A significantly higher proportion of salmeterol-treated patients had an increase of >15% in FEV1. Salmeterol patients had a higher mean proportion of symptom-free days and nights than those in the placebo group. More salmeterol patients had a clinically significant improvement in health status. Total healthcare costs were increased in the salmeterol group, but hospital and GP visit costs and concurrent COPD medication costs were lower. The reduction in hospital costs was sufficient to offset a substantial portion of the acquisition cost of salmeterol. Addition of salmeterol to COPD patients' current therapy improved lung function, health status at the expense of a modest increase in costs compared with usual therapy.

Salmeterol decreases eosinophilic cationic protein and rescue medication in patients inhaling beclomethasone dipropionate: preliminary study in mild and moderate asthma in Trinidad, West Indies

Activated eosinophils play a critical role in asthma pathogenesis, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) is a useful indicator of inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) effectively control asthma symptoms and improve airway function. Salmeterol's anti-inflammatory efficacy as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids has not been evaluated in Caribbean populations. We investigated nine non-smoking subjects (three men and six women; mean age: +/- SE, 50.7 +/- 3.82 years) with stable mild and moderate persistent asthma who were inhaling > or = 500 microg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) daily. This was a with-in-patient controlled laboratory blind study performed over 8 weeks. Patients received BDP for 2 weeks, add-on salmeterol 100 microg in weeks 3-6 and BDP alone in weeks 7-8. Patients recorded daily morning and night symptoms. Morning peak expiratory flow rate was measured on entry to the study and with sputum ECP at the end of weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8. Salmeterol together with BDP decreased sputum ECP from a pretreatment median value of 897.84 microg/l to 628.38 microg/l after 4 weeks, and ECP continued to decrease even after salmeterol withdrawal. Both drugs decreased the frequency of rescue medication use by approximately 50% and increased the median number of days per week without rescue salbutamol from 0 to 3 days. Salmeterol's bronchoprotective effect was maximal after 4 weeks and was sustained after its withdrawal. In conclusion, this study, performed in Trinidadian asthmatics, used ECP as a surrogate marker of bronchial inflammation and supports the recent Salmeterol Multi-center Asthma Research Trial (SMART) data recommending add-on salmeterol therapy to adequate anti-inflammatory medication such as inhaled corticosteroids for optimal asthma management. Further studies are required to evaluate the anti-inflammatory efficacy and possible tolerance to salmeterol in Caribbean patients.

[Milestones in inhalation therapy of airway diseases]

Inhalation is the preferred route for the application of drugs in the management of airway diseases. Therefore it was aimed at developing drugs suitable for inhalation. An important step was the introduction of the short- and long-acting beta 2-agonists and of a new generation of anticholinergics with longer duration of action. Most important was the development of inhaled glucocorticoids allowing good asthma control without relevant side effects even in a long run. Furthermore, the devices for drug application have been improved, and CFCs were substituted by HFAs.

[State of the art of the inhalation therapy of asthma]

The current concept of asthma pathogenesis is that a characteristic chronic inflammatory process involving the airway wall causes the development of airflow limitation and increased responsiveness, thereby predisposing the airways to narrow in response to a variety of specific (allergic) or unspecific stimuli. Medications for asthma are used to reverse and prevent symptoms and airflow limitation and include controllers and relievers. The major advantage of delivering drugs directly into the airways via inhalation is that high concentrations can be delivered more effectively to the airways, and systemic side effects are avoided or minimized. Bronchodilators with or without anti-inflammatory substances are used as basic therapeutic approach in these patients. The stepwise approach to therapy recommends that the number/type and frequency of medications are increased with increasing asthma severity by adding systemic medications to existing inhalation therapy (step III-IV in asthma management guidelines). Combination therapy using a long acting beta 2-agonist and a glucocorticosteroid resulted in higher lung function improvement, and was superior in reduction of exacerbation rates compared with an inhaled glucocorticosteroid alone. Hence, the development of a fixed combination containing both substances in one device is a logic consequence, and thus, simplifying asthma therapy.

Fluticasone versus salmeterol/low-dose fluticasone for long-term asthma control

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relative clinical superiority of increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate versus the addition of salmeterol to low-dose fluticasone propionate for long-term asthma control.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-October 2002). Key search terms included asthma, inhalation, corticosteroid, beta-adrenergic agonist, and combination drug therapy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Current guidelines for long-term control of asthma include treatment with either inhaled corticosteroids (medium dose) or inhaled corticosteroids (low to medium dose) in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator. Previous studies evaluating salmeterol or formoterol combination therapy with beclomethasone or budesonide have generally produced superior results compared with increasing the dose of the inhaled corticosteroid. Four recent controlled clinical trials have compared the clinical utility of fluticasone propionate monotherapy versus salmeterol/low-dose fluticasone propionate for long-term asthma control in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Based on spirometry data, rescue albuterol use, and symptom scores, the addition of salmeterol to low-dose fluticasone propionate was superior to increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, and symptom control, the addition of salmeterol to low-dose fluticasone propionate provides better control of asthma than increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate.

Effects of salmeterol on mucosal inflammation in asthma: a placebo-controlled study

Although the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma are established, the effects of long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists on inflammation are the subject of debate. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of salmeterol on the numbers of inflammatory cells in biopsy samples of distinct immunophenotype and those expressing the genes for interleukin-4 and -5, regulatory cytokines particularly relevant to asthma. Twenty patients (aged 18-55 yrs) with mild stable asthma were randomised in a three-way crossover study to 6 weeks of treatment with: 1) salmeterol (50 microg b.d.; SM50); 2) fluticasone propionate (250 microg b.d.; FP250), or 3) placebo. Compared with placebo, SM50 significantly reduced the numbers of neutrophils in bronchial biopsy samples and the concentrations of myeloperoxidase and soluble E-selectin in serum, each of which reflect neutrophil involvement. Compared with FP250, SM50 reduced neutrophil number and human neutrophil lipocalin level in bronchial lavage fluid and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Compared with placebo, FP250 significantly reduced the numbers of (CD3+) T-lymphocytes, (CD4+) T-helper cells, (CD45RO+) activated T-helper cells and eosinophils in the biopsy samples; it also reduced the percentage of eosinophils and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in serum. The percentage of symptom-free days and nights and airways hyperresponsiveness improved significantly after SM50 compared to both placebo and FP250. In conclusion, a novel antineutrophilic effect of the inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist, salmeterol, in mild asthma is reported.

From adrenaline to formoterol: advances in beta-agonist therapy in the treatment of asthma

Long-acting beta2-agonists (formoterol and salmeterol) represent the latest advance in a series of improvements in beta-agonist asthma therapy since the introduction of isoprenaline. Traditional inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists (salbutamol and terbutaline) provide rapid as-needed symptom relief and short-term prophylactic protection against bronchoconstriction induced by exercise or other stimuli. Where symptoms are not adequately controlled by corticosteroids alone, inhaled selective long-acting beta2-agonists are used additionally for maintenance. Salmeterol and formoterol are well tolerated, provide effective long-term symptom control and reduce the incidence of exacerbations; any development of tolerance or masking of underlying inflammation with continual use does not appear to be clinically relevant. Formoterol is both rapid acting (as fast as salbutamol) and long acting (similar to salmeterol). Increasing clinical evidence suggests that inhaled formoterol is a convenient and well-tolerated treatment that is effective both for regular maintenance and as-needed relief of symptoms.

Application of the chiral acyl anion equivalent, trans-1,3-dithiane 1,3-dioxide, to an asymmetric synthesis of (R)-salbutamol

An enantioselective synthesis of (R)-salbutamol has been carried out using the chiral, C2 symmetric acyl anion equivalent, (1R,3R)-1,3-dithiane 1,3-dioxide, which undergoes addition to an aromatic aldehyde with very high stereocontrol at 0 degrees C. Pummerer reaction and work-up with lithium ethanethiolate generated the alpha-hydroxy thiolester in high yield and further transformations led to the target compound with high enantiomeric excess.

Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT): a randomised, double-blind comparison of Seretide (50/250 microg bd Diskus vs. formoterol (12 microg bd) and budesonide (800 microg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy safety and cost of Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Salm/FP), 50/250 microg bd) via Diskus with formoterol (Form; 12 microg bd) and budesonide (Bud; 800 microg bd) given concurrently (Form+Bud) via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were uncontrolled on existing corticosteroid therapy. The study used a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, consisting of a 2-week run-in period on current corticosteroid therapy (1000-1600 microg/day of BDP or equivalent) and a 12-week treatment period. Symptomatic patients (n = 428) with FEV1 of 50-85% predicted and increased symptom scores or reliever use during run-in were randomly allocated to receive either Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd) via a single Diskus inhaleror Form+Bud (12+800 microg bd) via separate Turbuhalers. Clinic, diary card and asthma-related health-care resource utilisation data were collected. Improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam was similar in the Salm/FP and Form+Bud groups. Both PEFam and mean evening PEF (PEFpm) increased by a clinically significant amount (>20 L/min) from baseline in both treatment groups. The mean rate of exacerbations (mild, moderate or severe) was significantly lower in the Salm/FP group (0.472) compared with the Form+Bud group (0.735) (ratio = 0.64; P < 0.001), despite the three-fold lower microgram inhaled corticosteroid dose in the Salm/FP group. Patients in the Salm/FP group also experienced significantly fewer nocturnal symptoms, with a higher median percentage of symptom-free nights (P = 0.04), nights with a symptom score <2 (P = 0.03), and nights with no awakenings (P = 0.02). Total asthma-related health-care costs were significantly lower in the Salm/FP group than the Form+Bud group (P<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar low incidence of adverse events. This study showed that in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd), administered in a single convenient device (Diskus), was at least as effective as an approximately three-fold higher microgram corticosteroid dose of Bud (800 microg bd) given concurrently with Form (12 microg bd) in terms of improvement in PEFam, and superior at reducing exacerbations and nights with symptoms or night-time awakenings. Salm/FP was also the less costly treatment due primarily to lower hospitalisation and drug costs.