Reproducibility of a symptom response to omeprazole therapy in functional dyspepsia evaluated by a random-starting-day trial design

BACKGROUND

Satisfactory treatment options for functional dyspepsia are lacking. Single subject trial designs may identify subgroups of patients with a uniform response to therapy.

AIM

To test reproducibility of response in a new random-starting-day trial design developed to identify acid-related symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

One hundred and nineteen patients with functional dyspepsia completed a 12-day, double-blind random-starting-day trial with an initial placebo run-in followed by switch to omeprazole on a randomized and blinded day (between days 5 and 9) with active treatment continuing for the rest of the trial. Response was defined as a sustained > or =50% reduction of a daily symptom-score within 3 days of active treatment. Fifty-nine patients repeated the random-starting-day trial at relapse of symptoms.

RESULTS

After exclusion of placebo responders, 14% (15 of 106) were classified as responders in the first and 20% (10 of 50) in the subsequent random-starting-day trial series. Sixty-eight per cent (40 of 59) of the patients reproduced their initial response with a chance-corrected agreement of 0.29. Comparing response patterns using different symptom rating-scales showed good correlation (kappa 0.60).

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of response in a random-starting-day trial was imperfect, mainly because of the low response rates and strict response criteria. Lack of symptom stability impairs the value of the random-starting-day trial and only patients with frequent and stable symptoms should be evaluated in this design.

Diagnostic approach to dyspepsia

The optimal diagnostic approach to the dyspeptic patient in primary care is still debated. Early endoscopy continues to be the diagnostic gold standard but competing non-invasive strategies challenge this. The most important approaches are empiric antisecretory treatment reserving endoscopy for unresponsive patients and patients with an early symptomatic relapse and helicobacter-based strategies reserving endoscopy for infected patients (test-and-scope) or for failures after eradication therapy (test-and-treat). Early endoscopy is recommended in patients with alarm features and should be considered in patients with new onset dyspepsia after age 50. In the remaining patients, early investigation can only be recommended in areas providing endoscopy at a low cost and with a short waiting list. The test-and-scope strategy may lead to a rise in the referral rates for endoscopy and cannot be recommended. The test-and-treat strategy is well documented in clinical trials as a safe and cost-effective approach. Helicobacter-based strategies are challenged by a decreasing prevalence of peptic ulcer disease and of the infection. In the near future, the empirical acid inhibition strategy will probably be cost-effective as gastro-oesophageal reflux becomes the predominant disorder in dyspeptic patients.

Six-month trial of on-demand rabeprazole 10 mg maintains symptom relief in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Compliance studies have shown that patients with reflux symptoms generally take their medication only when experiencing these symptoms.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of on-demand rabeprazole maintenance therapy in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal study compared 6 months of on-demand treatment with rabeprazole 10 mg vs. placebo. Adults with a history of reflux symptoms, a negative endoscopy, and > or = 3 days of moderate to very severe heartburn in the 7 days before enrollment (N = 535) entered 4 weeks of open-label, acute treatment with rabeprazole 10 mg once daily. Patients with complete symptom relief then entered the on-demand phase. The primary end-point was discontinuation due to lack of heartburn control during the on-demand phase.

RESULTS

Eighty-three percent (432 of 523) of patients reported complete symptom relief at the end of the acute phase. During on-demand treatment, rates of discontinuation because of inadequate heartburn control were 20% (28 of 139) for placebo vs. 6% (16 of 279) for rabeprazole (P < 0.00001). Antacid use was twofold higher in the placebo group vs. the rabeprazole group (P = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole 10 mg once daily is highly effective in acute symptom relief and as on-demand long-term maintenance therapy in non-erosive reflux disease patients.

Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes

Despite major advances in our understanding of reflux disease, the management of this disorder still presents many challenges. Reduction of heartburn is the most readily apparent objective for the patient with reflux disease. Thus the ability to measure heartburn accurately is of fundamental importance to clinical research in reflux disease. Here, the available data on the assessment of reflux symptoms--predominantly heartburn--in clinical trials of symptomatic reflux disease are examined.

Clinical trial guidelines for pharmacological treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Appropriate guidelines for clinical trials in irritable bowel syndrome are needed because of the inadequacy of previously performed trials, the use of new and more adequate patient definition, new emerging pathophysiological models and the unique requirements related to the assessment of treatment outcome that, in the absence of a biological marker, can rely only on the evaluation of clinical manifestations. This consensus report highlights the following points. (a) A 4-week period is considered to be adequate to assess drug efficacy for the control of symptoms. (b) For the cyclic and non-life-threatening nature of the disease, a long-term study of 4-6 months or more of active treatment to establish efficacy is considered to be inappropriate in the large majority of patients. (c) In the initial assessment phase of drug efficacy, the withdrawal effect of treatment can be ascertained during a follow-up period prolonged for a sufficient time (4-8 weeks) after stopping treatment. Subsequent trials with proper withdrawal phase design and duration can then ascertain the drug post-treatment benefit. (d) Considering the intermittent clinical manifestations of irritable bowel syndrome, designing trials with on-demand or repeated cycles of treatment could be envisaged. However, the lack of a definition of what constitutes an exacerbation is a major obstacle to the design of such trials. In the absence of an established gold standard, appropriately justified novel trial designs are welcome. (e) Patients eligible for inclusion should comply with the Rome II diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. (f) The main efficacy outcome of the treatment should be based on one primary end-point. (g) The primary efficacy end-point could combine, in a global assessment, the key symptoms (abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, bowel alterations) of irritable bowel syndrome or rate any single symptom for drugs considered to target specific symptoms. (h) A 50% improvement in the primary efficacy end-point seems to be a reasonable definition of a responder.

Goals of therapy and guidelines for treatment success in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients

Important new data have established symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a disorder in its own right. Despite major advances in management, this disorder still presents many challenges. With the absence of visible disease (i.e., esophageal erosions), symptom relief must be a primary aim in treating patients with symptomatic GERD; in particular, reflux patients suffer from several different symptoms, but relief of heartburn and acid regurgitation should be the principal concern in clinical practice. Epigastric pain and other upper GI symptoms usually improve with active treatment. From a methodological standpoint, complete symptom relief is an attractive outcome measure. However, not all patients expect complete absence of symptoms in the long term, and many reflux patients are willing to continue a treatment strategy that provides substantial but less than absolute symptom control. Patients with symptomatic GERD have significantly impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) which, when heartburn is resolved, often improves to levels equal to or better than that found in the normal, healthy population. However, some reflux sufferers may not report symptoms and have apparently normal HRQOL measures owing only to the fact that they self-impose rigorous lifestyle restrictions to prevent heartburn-restrictions that may, in turn, eventually lead to HRQOL impairment. A full and complete evaluation of treatment success should be able to detect this pattern. Data on the long-term prognosis and risk of complications associated with treatment for symptomatic GERD are scarce and incomplete. However, the prevention of erosive esophageal damage, strictures, and adenocarcinoma should be a goal of long-term treatment success, even in symptomatic GERD.

Symptom clustering in subjects with and without diabetes mellitus: a population-based study of 15,000 Australian adults

OBJECTIVES

GI symptoms form distinct symptom clusters in community samples when factor and cluster analysis is applied. However, this has not been studied in diabetic populations, despite clear evidence that GI complaints are common in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aimed to describe clustering of GI symptoms among individuals with and without diabetes mellitus, and to describe associations of symptom clustering in diabetes mellitus, with self-reported glucose control and treatment.

METHODS

A large population survey (n = 15,000) was used to identify a cohort with diabetes mellitus. Items assessing therapy and quality of glycemic control were included, as were those assessing 16 common GI symptoms. Latent GI symptom factors were extracted by factor analysis and used in a k-means cluster analysis. The latter serves to group individuals according to commonalities in symptom profiles. The association of cluster group membership to glycemic control and diabetic treatment was described by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Factor analysis identified four latent symptom factors, which accounted for 69.3% of the total variance. These were labeled Upper GI/Dysmotility, Diarrhea, Constipation, and Vomiting/Nausea. The k-means analysis produced a five-cluster solution, which included a "health" group and four "diseased" groups, each identified by a predominant symptom: Upper GI/Dysmotility symptoms, Nausea/Vomiting, Diarrhea, and Constipation. After adjustment for age and gender, poor glycemic control predicted membership in all disease clusters, when compared separately with the health group. Oral hypoglycemic drugs predicted membership in the Nausea/Vomiting cluster (OR = 5.13) when used alone, and membership in the Nausea/Vomiting (OR = 10.12) and Upper GI/Dysmotility cluster (OR = 10.12) when used in combination with insulin.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes can be grouped according to common GI symptoms. Glycemic control and treatment for DM predict membership of symptom clusters.

H(2) receptor antagonists and prokinetics in dyspepsia: a critical review

Drug treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia is controversial but H(2) receptor antagonists have been the mainstay of treatment. For patients with symptoms suggestive of dysmotility, prokinetics such as cisapride have been used. A large number of clinical trials have been unable to produce definite answers as to whether any of these treatment modalities are truly efficacious. This is partly due to the fact that the methodology and reporting of the majority of trials evaluating the symptomatic effects of H(2) receptor antagonists and cisapride are severely flawed. Based on the current literature, H(2) receptor antagonists may possibly have a therapeutic gain of approximately 20% over placebo. Evaluating the therapeutic gain of cisapride is more difficult but meta-analyses indicate a somewhat larger effect.

A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of standard-dose rabeprazole and high-dose omeprazole in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Rabeprazole has a faster onset of antisecretory action than omeprazole, and it is of interest to determine whether this translates into faster symptom relief in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIMS

To assess the relief from heartburn after 3 days of treatment with standard-dose rabeprazole or high-dose omeprazole (primary end-point). Secondary end-points included the decrease in score for other symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, healing rates and quantification of antacid use.

METHODS

Patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis were randomized to receive 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with rabeprazole (20 mg) or omeprazole (40 mg). Patients who were not healed after 4 weeks received a further 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four patients were screened, 251 patients were randomized and 230 patients completed the trial. The numbers of patients with relief from heartburn on day 4 were similar in the two groups (84% for rabeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 76-90%; 83% for omeprazole; 95% confidence interval, 75-89%). There were no significant differences between the treatments in the relief from other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms or in healing rates. The number of reports of severe heartburn during the first 3 days was higher in the omeprazole group (daytime heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 10.3% for omeprazole, P=0.005; night-time heartburn: 4.7% for rabeprazole vs. 9.8% for omeprazole, P=0.01; statistical comparisons defined post hoc).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose rabeprazole was as effective as high-dose omeprazole in relieving symptoms by day 4 of treatment and in healing oesophageal lesions, but had a faster onset of action in patients with severe heartburn. This suggests that the improved pharmacological properties of rabeprazole translate into a clinically relevant advantage.

GI symptoms in diabetes mellitus are associated with both poor glycemic control and diabetic complications

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased prevalence of GI symptoms, but the mechanisms underlying symptoms are poorly defined and controversial. We aimed to determine whether there is a relationship between GI symptoms and both diabetic complications and glycemic control.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1101 subjects with diabetes mellitus recruited from outpatient clinics (n = 209) and the community (n = 892). Data on eight GI symptom groups, complications of diabetes (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy), and self-reported glycemic control were obtained from a validated questionnaire. Glycated hemoglobin was measured in 463 of the subjects, The association between diabetic complications, glycemic control, and GI symptoms was assessed using logistic regression analysis, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1101 subjects, 57% reported at least one complication. Diabetic complications were independently associated with both symptom complexity (number of symptom groups reported) (adjusted odds ratio = 1.92 per symptom group [95% CI = 1.51-2.45]) and seven of the eight GI symptom groups. For all symptom groups, the association was explained by self-reported symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. Poor glycemic control measured by both self-report and Hb A1c was an independent risk factor for upper GI symptoms, whereas other potential risk indicators, including duration and type of diabetes, were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

GI symptoms in diabetes mellitus may be linked to diabetic complications, particularly peripheral neuropathy, and to poor glycemic control.

Review article: Single subject trials as a research instrument in gastrointestinal pharmacology

The single subject trial is a randomized controlled trial carried out in the individual patient, and the result obtained is specific to the individual patient and the drug being investigated. This type of trial offers a supplement to traditional parallel group trials, especially in patients with heterogeneous disorders, often characterized by varying treatment responses and/or high placebo response rates. Pooled results from several individual single subject trials could extend the conclusions beyond the individual patient, and help to characterize a subset of responders to a specific treatment or clarify the heterogeneity of the disease. The basic principles of the different single subject trial designs are described. Advantages and limitations are reviewed with a special focus on published trials in functional gastrointestinal disorders. The single subject trial may be a valuable supplement to traditional drug treatment trials, either used as isolated trials in individual patients to determine optimal therapy, or in groups of patients to identify those with a uniform response to treatment. However, the lack of validation and reliability studies limits the value of the single subject trials presented so far.

[Prevention of NSAID induced gastroduodenal ulcers]

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important agents in the management of arthritic and inflammatory conditions, and are among the most frequently prescribed medications in North America and Europe. However, there is overwhelming evidence linking these agents to a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness of common interventions for the prevention of NSAID induced upper GI toxicity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A literature search was conducted, according to the Cochrane methodology for identification of randomized controlled trials in electronic databases, including MEDLINE from 1966 to January 2000, Current Contents for 6 months prior to January 2000, Embase to February 1999, and a search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from 1973 to 1999. Recent conference proceedings were reviewed and content experts and companies were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of prostaglandin analogues (PA), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for the prevention of chronic NSAID induced upper Gl toxicity were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data regarding population characteristics, study design, methodological quality and number of patients with endoscopic ulcers, ulcer complications, symptoms, overall drop-outs, drop-outs due to symptoms. Dichotomous data was pooled using Revman V3.1. Heterogeneity was evaluated using a chi square test.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. All doses of misoprostol significantly reduced the risk of endoscopic ulcers. Misoprostol 800 micrograms/day was superior to 400 micrograms/day for the prevention of endoscopic gastric ulcers (RR = 0.18, and RR = 0.38 respectively, p = 0.0055). A dose response relationship was not seen with duodenal ulcers. Misoprostol caused diarrhea at all doses, although significantly more at 800 micrograms/day than 400 micrograms/day (p = 0.0012). Misoprostol was the only prophylactic agent documented to reduce ulcer complications. Standard doses of H2RAs were effective at reducing the risk of endoscopic duodenal (RR = 0.24; 95%, CI: 0.10-0.57) but not gastric ulcers (RR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.50-1.09). Both double dose H2RAs and PPIs were effective at reducing the risk of endoscopic duodenal and gastric ulcers (RR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.74 and RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 27-0.51 respectively for gastric ulcer), and were better tolerated than misoprostol.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Misoprostol, PPIs, and double dose H2RAs are effective at preventing chronic NSAID related endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcers. Lower doses of misoprostol are less effective and are still associated with diarrhea. Only misoprostol 800 micrograms/day has been directly shown to reduce the risk of ulcer complications.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: a population-based survey of 15,000 adults

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal symptoms are reportedly common in diabetes, but a causal link is controversial and adequate population control data are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether gastrointestinal symptoms are more frequent in persons with diabetes, particularly in those with poor glycemic control.

METHODS

Fifteen thousand adults were mailed a questionnaire (response rate, 60.0%) containing validated questions on the frequency of troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms within the past 3 months, diabetic status, and self-reported glycemic control. The prevalence of 16 symptoms and 5 symptom complexes, reported to occur often or very often, was compared using logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age and sex.

RESULTS

Overall, 8657 eligible subjects responded; 423 (4.9%) reported having diabetes. Most (94.8%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adjusting for age and sex, all 16 symptoms and the 5 symptom complexes were significantly more frequent in subjects with diabetes compared with controls. An increased prevalence rate of symptoms was significantly associated with poorer levels of glycemic control but not with duration of diabetes or type of diabetic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased prevalence of upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms. This effect may be linked to poor glycemic control but not to duration of diabetes or type of treatment.

[Dyspepsia. Investigation and treatment]

Dyspepsia is defined as chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen. Early satiety, nausea, vomiting, or bloating are often also present. Dyspepsia should be differentiated from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, whose predominant symptoms are heartburn and acid regurgitation. Prevalence rates vary between 25% and 40%, and dyspepsia is the main reason for consulting GPs: 3-5% of all visits. Older patients and patients presenting with alarm symptoms (weight loss, anaemia, jaundice, dysphagia, bleeding) should undergo endoscopy, but apart from this no other management strategy has been agreed upon. Management strategies based on non-invasive H. pylori testing will probably prove cost-effective and safe. However, the results of clinical trials are awaited before guidelines can be offered. The symptomatic effects of treating patients with functional dyspepsia with either acid inhibitors, prokinetics, or H. pylori eradication therapy are difficult to predict and are usually quite modest.

Low socioeconomic class is a risk factor for upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms: a population based study in 15 000 Australian adults

BACKGROUND

The association of social class with health has been extensively studied, yet relationships between social class and gastrointestinal symptoms remain almost unexplored.

AIMS

To examine relationships between social class and gastrointestinal symptoms in a population sample.

METHODS

The prevalence of 16 troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms was determined by a postal questionnaire sent to 15 000 subjects (response rate 60%) and compared with a validated composite measure of socioeconomic status (index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage). Comparisons across social class were explored for five symptom categories (oesophageal symptoms; upper dysmotility symptoms; bowel symptoms; diarrhoea; and constipation). Results are reported as age standardised rate ratios with the most advantaged social class as the reference category.

RESULTS

There were clear trends for the prevalence rates of all gastrointestinal symptoms to increase with decreasing social class. These trends were particularly strong for the five symptom categories. Lower social class was associated with a significantly (p<0.0001) higher number of symptoms reported overall and with a higher proportion of individuals reporting 1-2 symptoms and more than five symptoms. In both sexes, the most pronounced effects for subjects in the lowest social class were found for constipation (males: rate ratio 1.83 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16-2.51); females: rate ratio 1.68 (95% CI 1.31-2.04)) and upper dysmotility symptoms (males: rate ratio 1.45 (95% CI 1.02-1.88); females: rate ratio 1.35 (95% CI 1.07-1.63)). Oesophageal symptoms and diarrhoea were not associated with social class.

CONCLUSIONS

Troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms are linked to socioeconomic status with more symptoms reported by subjects in low socioeconomic classes. Low socioeconomic class should be considered a risk factor for both upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms.

Current indications for acid suppressants in dyspepsia

Anti-secretory drug use is common in patients with uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia, but the value of such agents has been controversial. Four large studies have evaluated the symptomatic outcome after a short course of acid inhibition in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia presenting in primary care. All of these studies demonstrated a superior symptom response to proton pump inhibitor therapy compared with placebo and acid-alginates or H(2)-receptor antagonists. In patients with documented functional dyspepsia, 17 parallel group trials have evaluated an H(2)-receptor antagonist against placebo, with mixed results. A recent Cochrane review based on eight controlled trials concluded that there was a significant benefit of H(2)-blockers over placebo with a relative risk reduction of 30%, but as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was not excluded, the conclusions are questionable. Six controlled studies have compared symptom relief after a short course of proton pump inhibitor therapy compared with placebo. Overall, there does appear to be a therapeutic gain with proton pump inhibitors over placebo, although how much of this is explained by undiagnosed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease remains unclear. There is conflicting evidence on the value of symptom subgrouping as a predictor of response to acid suppression. Overall, there is little convincing evidence that Helicobacter pylori infection influences the therapeutic outcome of acid-suppressant therapy. In conclusion, there appears to be a subgroup of patients with functional dyspepsia who will respond to acid suppression over and above placebo, but further work is required to characterize these responders.

Review article: acid suppression in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--an appraisal of treatment options in primary care

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common conditions presenting to the primary care physician. Despite progress in understanding and treatment of the disease, strategies for capitalizing on these advances are less well developed. In many practices, H2-receptor antagonists still remain the most widely prescribed treatment for GERD, despite the availability of the more effective acid-suppressant proton pump inhibitors. This review examines the relative efficacies of acid-suppressant drugs in minimizing oesophageal acid exposure and outlines the evidence for the superiority of proton pump inhibitors over standard-dose H(2)-antagonists in symptom relief, erosion healing and prevention of relapse in GERD. Current prescribing patterns and considerations for the general practitioner are also examined. The availability and impact of over-the-counter H(2)-antagonists on the treatment of GERD and their relative cost-effectiveness vs. proton pump inhibitors are also addressed. A hierarchy of drug efficacy (full-dose proton pump inhibitor > half-dose proton pump inhibitor > high-dose H(2)-antagonist > standard-dose H(2)-antagonist or prokinetic) applies in principle to all GERD patients, (with or without oesophagitis). The most effective initial therapy for GERD is also likely to be the most cost-effective one, if treatment failure leads to higher utilization of medical resources. The application of these recommendations to the management of non-endoscoped GERD, endoscopy-negative GERD and low-grade oesophagitis as well as higher grade oesophagitis is also reviewed.

Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcers: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis--results from a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The proportion of Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease appears to be increasing. Data on clinical outcome and prognosis in this subgroup are lacking.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy-six duodenal ulcer patients randomized, irrespective of H. pylori status, to either eradication therapy or maintenance omeprazole (double-blind, double-dummy design) for 1 yr were studied. Patients were followed up for a total of 2 yr, with visits performed every 2 months the first year and every 6 months the following year. Endoscopies for assessment of ulcer relapse were done at 6 and 12 months or in the event of symptomatic relapse. H. pylori status was assessed by culture, immunohistochemistry, and urea breath test at entry, at 6, 12, and 24 months or at failure. The primary endpoint was discontinuation, irrespective of reason. Patients were considered H. pylori negative if all three tests were negative. Patients were considered H. pylori-positive if any of the three diagnostic tests were positive. Study staff were blinded to H. pylori results.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (12%) patients were H. pylori negative at entry. There were no differences according to H. pylori status for a number of clinical and demographic characteristics. However, H. pylori-negative patients had a shorter history of ulcer symptoms and were more likely to be NSAID users (19% vs 1%, p < 0.001). Only 28% of the H. pylori-negative patients completed the study, as compared with 40% of H. pylori-positive patients (p = 0.0005). The main reasons for the poorer prognosis in H. pylori-negative patients were relapse of ulcer/ulcer not healed (35% vs 26%) and relapse of severe dyspepsia symptoms without ulcer relapse (16% vs 7%). H. pylori-negative patients randomized to eradication therapy left the study early compared with H. pylori-negative patients randomized to long-term omeprazole therapy. Outcome in omeprazole-treated patients did not differ according to H. pylori status (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical characteristics in H. pylori-negative and positive duodenal ulcer patients differ little. Clinical outcome over 2 yr is significantly poorer in H. pylori-negative patients, especially if treated empirically with eradication therapy. These results suggest that H. pylori infection should be assessed in all duodenal ulcer patients before treatment is decided.

On-demand therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

A chronic and recurrent disorder gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) affects as many as 50% of adults and is likely to require long-term therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are now considered first-line treatment for GORD, with daily dosing the currently accepted approach to long-term treatment. However, most patients with GORD treat themselves on an as-needed basis to relieve symptoms (primarily heartburn) associated with this disease. Limited results from clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic studies have shown that 'on-demand' therapy is both efficacious and cost-effective in patients with uncomplicated GORD. Newer PPIs, which rapidly and profoundly suppress acid secretion and provide significant symptom relief with the first dose, may be most suitable for on-demand therapy in patients with uncomplicated GORD. First-dose acid suppression and symptom relief vary among PPIs; these differences require further investigation.

Dyspepsia

Dyspepsia refers to pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. This symptom is remarkably common, with 1-year prevalence rates averaging 25% in the community. Symptoms suggestive of the irritable bowel syndrome and reflux disease frequently overlap but do not form part of the definition of dyspepsia. Electrical and other stimuli can cause similar or different symptoms in various patients, and even the site to which symptoms are referred varies considerably. Dyspeptic symptoms are therefore a relatively poor guide to the origin or nature of any "disturbances" in the gut. Identification of patients who require further investigation to rule out serious structural disease, such as peptic ulcer disease or cancer, is a key issue because unaided clinical diagnosis is unreliable. The use of an age threshold (typically 45 years) and the identification of alarm features, including weight loss, repeated vomiting, and signs of bleeding, seem to be valid on the basis of the limited evidence available. Dyspeptic symptoms fall into distinct subgroups resembling the perceived clinical entities of ulcer-like and dysmotility-like dyspepsia. Unfortunately, because of overlap with reflux symptoms and between the subgroups, the clinical significance of these groups remains highly questionable. A focus on symptom predominance may be more rewarding. Lack of validated outcome measures has hampered clinical studies and has led to the development of complex outcome measures that integrate and weigh different symptoms or other indirect indicators of outcome into a general score. Further testing and validation are in progress.

Psychological distress is linked to gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus, but the pathogenesis is controversial. We aimed to determine if GI symptoms are linked to psychological distress in diabetes.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of outpatients with diabetes mellitus (n = 209) and a random sample of community diabetics (n = 892) completed a validated questionnaire measuring GI symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale for anxiety and depression, and the Eysenck short neuroticism scale.

RESULTS

Overall, 42% reported one or more GI symptoms: bloating, abdominal pain, loose stools, and urgency were most common. The mean HAD and neuroticism scores were significantly higher for most GI symptoms (11 of 14, all p < 0.05), and a dose-response relationship was observed. GI symptoms were, in general, approximately twice as frequent in cases with anxiety or depression (HAD > or = 11). Anxiety, depression, and neuroticism were each independently associated with the number of GI symptoms, adjusting for age, gender, duration and type of diabetes, and self-reported glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased levels of state anxiety and depression and neuroticism are associated with upper and lower GI symptoms in diabetes mellitus. It is uncertain whether psychological distress is causally linked to symptoms, or whether GI symptoms per se increase levels of anxiety and depression.

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs and gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal symptoms are commonly reported as side-effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs. It may be very difficult to distinguish between spontaneous and truly drug-related symptoms due to the high background incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetic patients have also been linked to factors associated with long-standing disease and suboptimal control.

AIM

To explore the association between gastrointestinal symptoms and treatment with oral hypoglycaemic drugs in a large cohort of subjects with type 2 diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

956 subjects with type 2 diabetes participated in the study. All subjects completed a validated, self-administered questionnaire on gastrointestinal symptoms, diabetes, drug use and various potential risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms. The association between oral hypoglycaemics and nine gastrointestinal symptom groups was assessed based on logistic regression.

RESULTS

405 of the 956 patients used oral hypoglycaemic drugs. Metformin use was independently associated with chronic diarrhoea (odds ratio 3.08, 95% CI: 1.29-7.36, P < 0.02) and with faecal incontinence (odds ratio 1.95, 95% CI: 1.10-3.47, P < 0.05). Use of sulphonylureas was associated with less abdominal pain, but not with any other gastrointestinal symptom.

CONCLUSIONS

Troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms do not appear to be caused by oral hypoglycaemics, except for diarrhoea and faecal incontinence, which are strongly and independently associated with metformin use.

Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

Brief, reliable, and valid self-administered questionnaires could facilitate the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care. We report the development and validation of such an instrument.

METHODS

Content validity was informed by literature review, expert opinion, and cognitive interviewing of 50 patients resulting in a 22-item survey. For psychometric analyses, primary care patients completed the new questionnaire at enrollment and at intervals ranging from 3 days to 3 wk. Multitrait scaling, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed. Predictive validity analyses of all scales and items used specialty physician diagnosis as the "gold standard."

RESULTS

Iterative factor analyses yielded three scales of four items each including heartburn, acid regurgitation, and dyspepsia. Multitrait scaling criteria including internal consistency, item interval consistency, and item discrimination were 100% satisfied. Test-retest reliability was high in those reporting stable symptoms. Scale scores significantly changed in those reporting a global change. Regressing specialty physician diagnosis on the three scales revealed significant effects for two scales (heartburn and regurgitation). Combining the two significant scales enhanced the strength of the model. Symptom response to self-directed treatment with nonprescription antisecretory medications was highly predictive of the diagnosis also, although the item demonstrated poor validity and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief, simple 12-item questionnaire demonstrated validity and reliability and seemed to be responsive to change for reflux and dyspeptic symptoms.

Impact of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes mellitus on health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVES

Morbidity from GI symptoms in diabetes is considered to be high, but no studies have quantified the impact of GI symptoms in diabetes on health-related quality of life. We hypothesized that diabetics reporting increased GI symptoms would experience more impaired quality of life.

METHODS

Subjects from the community with diabetes (n = 892) and outpatients with diabetes (n = 209) were recruited for this study. Subjects were divided into type 1 (diabetes diagnosed at age <30 yr and requiring insulin) and type 2. A validated questionnaire measuring GI symptoms and diabetes status and the Short Form-36 were completed. The results were compared with Australian normal data. GI symptom groups measured were frequent abdominal pain, bowel-related abdominal pain, reflux, dyspepsia, constipation, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence.

RESULTS

There was a clinically significant decrease in quality-of-life scores in diabetics compared with population norms across all subscales. The impact on quality of life in diabetes was predominantly observed in type 2 diabetics. The quality-of-life scores in all subscales decreased markedly with increasing numbers of distinct GI symptom groups, and this was similar in community and outpatient diabetics. For all the Short Form-36 subscales, GI symptom groups were significantly (all p < 0.0001) associated with poorer quality of life in diabetes, independent of age, gender, smoking, alcohol use, and type of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

GI symptoms impact negatively on health-related quality of life in diabetes mellitus.

Drug-induced symptoms of functional dyspepsia and nausea. A symmetry analysis of one million prescriptions

BACKGROUND

A large variety of drugs have been implicated in causing dyspepsia. Due to the high background incidence of dyspepsia it is impossible to distinguish between spontaneous and truly drug-related symptoms. Most patients with dyspeptic symptoms are treated empirically. Drug-induced dyspepsia might therefore be reflected in the sequencing of prokinetics relative to other medications.

AIM

To screen a large prescription database for signs of drug-induced functional dyspepsia, applying a symmetry principle.

METHODS

Prescription data on all incident users of cisapride and metoclopramide were used to identify individuals who had started their first therapies with a prokinetic drug and an index drug within a 100-day span. A dyspepsia-provoking effect of the index drug would manifest as an excess of persons with the prokinetic drug prescribed last in this selected population. Relative to conventional analyses based on case-control or cohort design, this principle is robust to confounders that are stable over time.

RESULTS

In the cisapride analysis (1825 persons) no single drug had adjusted rate ratios significantly above unity. An inverse signal for antidepressants (rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.84) suggests that these drugs may have a therapeutic effect against functional dyspepsia. In the metoclopramide analysis (6126 persons) positive signals were found for 14 drugs, all well-known for causing nausea as a side-effect, with the exception of insulin (rate ratio 2.91, 95% CI: 1.40-8.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced symptoms of functional dyspepsia are rare and do not contribute to the use of cisapride. The start of insulin treatment may induce nausea.

Identifying responders to acid suppression in dyspepsia using a random starting day trial

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia is a heterogeneous condition and a uniform response to drug treatment is not likely. This may be the reason for the general failure of acid suppression in clinical trials in these patients. It may be more rewarding to identify true responders to drug treatment by a single subject trial.

AIM

To develop and to test a novel single subject trial design (random starting day trial) in dyspeptic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 301 dyspeptic patients entered a 16-day trial. All patients received placebo for the first 4 days and switched to omeprazole at a randomized and blinded day between day 5 and day 14. Response was defined as a sustained >/= 50% decrease in symptom score occurring in relation to drug shifting.

RESULTS

Spontaneous response varied between 0.3% and 10.6% per day, uniformly distributed over time. Overall, 53-61% of patients with organic dyspepsia had a symptom response in relation to shifting to active treatment, compared to only 23% of patients with functional dyspepsia. The only predictor of response was symptoms suggesting gastro-oesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

A random starting day trial may be a valuable tool to identify response to acid suppression in dyspeptic patients.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori compared with long-term acid suppression in duodenal ulcer disease. A randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. The Danish Ulcer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Trials evaluating long-term management of duodenal ulcer disease have mainly been focused on recurrence of ulcers, disregarding effects on dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Profound acid inhibition with a proton pump inhibitor is the gold standard therapy in acid-related diseases. We aimed to compare the symptomatic effects of eradication therapy with those of long-term omeprazole treatment in a design with periods both with and without acid inhibition.

METHODS

Patients with active duodenal ulcer were randomized either to omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily until healing, followed by omeprazole, 20 mg/ day for 1 year, or to eradication therapy (metronidazole, amoxicillin, and omeprazole for 2 weeks) followed by placebo for 1 year. All patients were followed up passively for an additional year. Clinical controls were performed every 2 months the 1st year (maintenance phase) and every 6 months during the passive follow-up phase. The study was multicentric and double-blind. The primary end-point was discontinuation of treatment, irrespective of reason.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-six patients were randomized (139 in the eradication treatment group). In the maintenance phase there were no differences in the reporting of dyspeptic symptoms or in premature withdrawal. In the passive follow-up phase only five patients in the eradication therapy group discontinued owing to relapse of dyspeptic symptoms or ulcer, compared with 51 patients initially randomized to long-term omeprazole. There were no differences in reflux symptoms or in the development of reflux oesophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Eradication therapy and long-term omeprazole are equally effective in controlling dyspeptic symptoms and reflux in duodenal ulcer patients with healed ulcers. One-quarter of the duodenal ulcer patients who start eradication therapy continue to be symptomatic or fail therapy for other reasons over a 2-year period. Eradication therapy does not increase the risk of reflux in ulcer patients.

The value of alarm features in identifying organic causes of dyspepsia

The unaided clinical diagnosis of dyspepsia is of limited value in separating functional dyspepsia from clinically relevant organic causes of dyspepsia (gastric and esophageal malignancies, peptic ulcer disease and complicated esophagitis). The identification of one or more alarm features, such as weight loss, dysphagia, signs of gastrointestinal bleeding, an abdominal mass or age over 45 years may help identify patients with a higher risk of organic disease. This review summarizes the frequency of alarm symptoms in dyspeptic patients in different settings (such as the community, primary care and specialist clinics). The prevalence of alarm features in patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal malignancy or peptic ulcer disease is described. The probability of diagnosing clinically relevant upper gastrointestinal disease in patients presenting with alarm features and other risk factors is discussed. Alarm features such as age, significant weight loss, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, signs of bleeding and dysphagia may help stratify dyspeptic patients and help optimize the use of endoscopy resources.

[Menetrier's disease. Another Helicobacter pylori associated disease?]

Ménétrier's disease is a rare and poorly outlined disease, diagnosed in patients with giant gastric folds, dyspeptic symptoms and hypoalbuminaemia due to gastrointestinal protein loss. The etiology is unknown, but Ménétrier's disease is often associated with Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection. Case reports and studies concerning the effect of eradication therapy in patients with Ménétrier's disease were reviewed. It was found that complete normalisation of the gastric mucosa and gastrointestinal protein loss following eradication therapy has been reported in several cases. In conclusion, we recommend patients with Ménétrier's disease to be tested for Hp, and treated with eradication therapy in case of infection.

Helicobacter pylori test-and-eradicate versus prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Strategies based on screening for Helicobacter pylori to manage dyspeptic patients in primary care have been proposed, but the clinical consequences are unclear. We did a randomised trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a test-and-eradicate strategy compared with prompt endoscopy in the management of patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS

500 patients presenting in primary care with dyspepsia (> or = 2 weeks of epigastric pain, no alarm symptoms) were assigned H. pylori testing plus eradication therapy or endoscopy. Symptoms, quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and use of resources were recorded during 1 year of follow-up.

FINDINGS

250 patients were assigned test-and-eradicate, and 250 prompt endoscopy. The median age was 45 years and 28% were H. pylori infected. 1 year follow-up was completed by 447 patients. We found no differences in symptoms between the two groups (median registered days without dyspeptic symptoms=0.63 [IQR 0.27-0.81] in the test-and-eradicate group vs 0.67 [0.36-0.86] in the prompt endoscopy group; mean difference 0.04 [95% CI -0.01-0.10], p=0.12). Nor did we find any difference in quality of life or numbers of sick-leave days, visits to general practitioners, or hospital admissions. In the test-and-eradicate group, 27 (12%) of the patients were dissatisfied with management, compared with eight (4%) in the endoscopy group (p=0.013). After 1 year, the use of endoscopies in the test-and-eradicate group was 0.40 times (95% CI 0.31-0.51) the use in the endoscopy group, the use of H. pylori tests increased by a factor of 8.1 (5.7-13.1), the use of eradication treatments increased by a factor of 1.5 (0.9-2.7), and the use of proton-pump inhibitors was 0.89 (0.59-1.33) times the use in the endoscopy group. 43 (91% [80-98%]) of 47 peptic-ulcer patients would have been identified by endoscopy or treated by eradication therapy.

INTERPRETATION

A H. pylori test-and-eradicate strategy is as efficient and safe as prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients in primary care, although fewer patients are satisfied with their treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of gastroscopy

In a health economics perspective, no other decision area in gastroenterology has been more debated than the role of gastroscopy in dyspepsia. Cost-effectiveness analyses correlate costs with health outcomes. The cost-effectiveness of a diagnostic strategy must be compared to that of a competing strategy to produce useful information. This review examines the cost-effectiveness of gastroscopy in the management of dyspeptic patients, in particular in relation to the competing strategies of deferred referral guided by the outcome of either empirical antisecretory medication or of a non-invasive Helicobacter pylori test. Estimates of costs of gastroscopy differ widely. Cost estimates are usually much lower in European countries compared to the US. This is probably mainly due to differences in the calculations and in the payer perspective used. Cost-effectiveness analyses in dyspepsia management and the role of gastroscopy are difficult to interpret and impossible to compare due to a lack of uniformity in designing, measuring and reporting costs and health-care related outcome. Compared to empirical acid inhibition and to a test-and-scope strategy initial endoscopy is probably cost-effective--at least in Europe. Based on preliminary findings from clinical trials and from decision analyses a test-and-eradicate management strategy in young dyspeptic patients without warning symptoms seems to be cost-effective compared to early endoscopy. Implementing a test-and-eradicate strategy in primary care will probably save endoscopies without harmful effects. In view of the rapidly changing epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Western world the long-term effects of such a policy should be monitored closely.

Management of uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia: a Working Party report for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology 1998

BACKGROUND

The management of dyspepsia is controversial.

METHODS

An international Working Party was convened in 1998 to review management strategies for dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia, based on a review of the literature and best clinical practice.

RESULTS

Dyspepsia, defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen, can be managed with reassurance and over-the-counter therapy if its duration is less than 4 weeks on initial presentation. For patients with chronic symptoms, clinical evaluation depends on alarm features including patient age. The age cut off selected should depend on the age specific incidence when gastric cancer begins to increase, but in Western nations 50 years is generally an acceptable age threshold. In younger patients without alarm features, Helicobacter pylori test and treatment is the approach recommended because of its value in eliminating the peptic ulcer disease diathesis. If, after eradication of H. pylori, symptoms either are not relieved or rapidly recur, then an empirical trial of therapy is recommended. Similarly, in H. pylori-negative patients without alarm features, an empirical trial (with antisecretory or prokinetic therapy depending on the predominant symptom) for up to 8 weeks is recommended. If drugs fail, endoscopy should be considered because of its reassurance value although the yield will be low. In older patients or those with alarm features, prompt endoscopy is recommended. If endoscopy is non-diagnostic, gastric biopsies are recommended to document H. pylori status unless already known. While treatment of H. pylori is unlikely to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia, the long-term benefits probably outweigh the risks and treatment can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In H. pylori-negative patients with documented functional dyspepsia, antisecretory or prokinetic therapy, depending on the predominant symptom, is reasonable, assuming reassurance and explanation are insufficient, unless patients have already failed this approach. Other treatment options include antidepressants, antispasmodics, visceral analgesics such as serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists, and behavioural or psychotherapy although these are all of uncertain efficacy. Long-term drug treatment in functional dyspepsia should be avoided; intermittent short courses of treatment as needed is preferred.

CONCLUSION

The management of dyspepsia recommended is based on current best evidence but must be tailored to local factors such as practice setting, the background prevalence of H. pylori and structural disease, and costs.

Design of treatment trials for functional gastrointestinal disorders

Until recently many clinical trials of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) suffered from important weaknesses in trial design, study execution, and data analysis. This makes it difficult to determine whether truly efficacious therapies exist for these disorders. One of the important methodologic problems is the absence of validated outcome measures and lack of consensus among stakeholders on how to measure outcome. Currently much of the effort is being put into the development of validated outcome measures for several of the FGIDs. The randomized, controlled trial with parallel groups is the design of choice. In this report, guidelines are given for the basic architecture of intervention studies of FGIDs. Further studies on design issues are required to ensure the recommendations will become evidence based in the future.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and Barrett's esophagus: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

We described incidence rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Denmark in a 20-yr period and determined the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had a previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus, making them potential candidates for endoscopic surveillance.

METHODS

Rates of esophageal and gastric cancers were collected from the Danish Cancer registry for the period 1970-1991. The registry was used to identify all cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the period 1987-1992. Medical records were retrieved and details concerning previous diagnosis of reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus were recorded.

RESULTS

The age- and gender-adjusted incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased eightfold, from 0.3/10(5)/yr in 1970 to 2.3/10(5)/yr in 1990. This increase could not be explained by changes in classification or diagnostic routines. Medical data were retrieved for 524 of the 578 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma reported during the period 1987-1992. A history of reflux symptoms or a diagnosis compatible with reflux was reported in 113 of 524 patients. A total of 119 patients (23%) had previously been investigated for dyspepsia or reflux symptoms, most often by endoscopy. A previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus was found in only 1.3% of the cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Denmark has increased eightfold over a 20-yr period, and this increase is not explained by changes in classification or diagnostic routines. More than 98% of esophageal adenocarcinomas were found in patients who could not have entered endoscopic surveillance, as Barrett's esophagus had not been diagnosed before the cancer diagnosis. Endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia may be an option for the individual patient with Barrett's esophagus, but these screening programs are not likely to reduce the death rate from esophageal adenocarcinomas in the general population.

How should new-onset dyspepsia be managed in general and specialist practice?

Managing patients with new-onset dyspeptic symptoms represents a real challenge in clinical decision-making. The major controversy has been over the optimal management strategy of patients with new-onset dyspeptic symptoms who do not present with alarm symptoms. Since unaided clinical diagnosis is unreliable, proposed management strategies have included empirical treatment algorithms, computer-assisted predictive score models and Helicobacter pylori-based strategies such as test-and-scope or test-and-treat algorithms. Endoscopy remains the diagnostic 'gold standard', and the management should ideally be based on endoscopic diagnosis. Because of economic constraints and increasing waiting lists, this is not possible. When precise and comprehensive guidelines have been formulated, future patients will probably be managed in primary care by a Helicobacter test-and-treat policy, leaving only empirical treatment failures for specialist evaluation.

Management of dyspeptic patients in primary care. Value of the unaided clinical diagnosis and of dyspepsia subgrouping

BACKGROUND

Most dyspeptic patients in primary care are managed without confirmatory investigations. In this study the reliability of the unaided clinical diagnosis and the diagnostic value of dyspepsia subgrouping are evaluated in unselected dyspeptic patients in primary care.

METHODS

Six hundred and twelve unselected dyspeptic patients were referred for interview and endoscopy. General practitioners stated a provisional diagnosis and a proposed management strategy. Before endoscopy, patients were classified on the basis of predominant symptoms as reflux-, ulcer-, or dysmotility-like or as unclassifiable

RESULTS

The sensitivity and the positive predictive value of the diagnosis of ulcer were 0.58 and 0.29, respectively, and those for esophagitis 0.30 and 0.43. The predictive value of a clinical diagnosis of functional dyspepsia was high, but, considering the high prevalence of the condition, the chance-corrected validity was at the same level as for the other diagnoses (0.18-0.22). Classification of patients by predominant symptoms increased the a priori probability of ulcer and esophagitis in the respective subgroups. However, more than one-third of the patients with ulcer or esophagitis were classified in inappropriate subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to select an appropriate management strategy for dyspeptic patients on the basis of symptoms and history alone. Dyspepsia subgroups are of limited help in the decision process because of the low predictive value of the endoscopic diagnosis.

Placebo-controlled trial of cisapride and nizatidine in unselected patients with functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVE

Patients in most trials of pharmacotherapy for nonorganic dyspepsia have been groups referred selectively for endoscopy, which could have led to a selection bias of nonresponders, explaining the negative outcome of most controlled treatment trials in nonorganic dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of cisapride and nizatidine in patients with nonorganic dyspepsia who were recruited directly from primary care settings, and to evaluate the therapeutic implications of dyspepsia subgrouping.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who consulted their general practitioner with dyspepsia were invited to an interview and endoscopy. Before endoscopy, symptoms were classified as reflux-like, dysmotility-like, ulcer-like, or unclassifiable. A total of 330 patients with either minor or no abnormalities at endoscopy were randomized to double blind treatment with cisapride 10 mg t.i.d., nizatidine 300 mg at night, or placebo for 2 wk.

RESULTS

A symptomatic response was found in 62% of patients on cisapride (therapeutic gain cisapride vs placebo: 0.1% [95% confidence interval -14% to 14%]) and in 54% of patients on nizatidine (therapeutic gain nizatidine vs placebo: -8% [95% confidence interval -22% to 7%]). Response to treatment was independent of symptom classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of a 2-wk course of cisapride or nizatidine in unselected patients with dyspepsia recruited from primary care were not superior to those of placebo. Symptom subgrouping was not predictive of response to therapy.

Screening for drug related dyspepsia: an analysis of prescription symmetry

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with severe upper dyspepsia are treated empirically with ulcer drugs. Drug-induced dyspepsia might therefore be reflected in the sequencing of ulcer drugs relative to other medications. Our aim was to screen a large population-base prescription database for evidence of drug-induced dyspepsia.

METHODS

Prescription data on 31,232 incident users of ulcer drugs were drawn from a research database, covering the county of Funen, Denmark. We identified all individuals who had started their first recorded therapies with an ulcer drug and another non-ulcer drug within a 100 day span. In this selected group, there would normally be an equal number starting either drug first, while a dyspepsia-provoking effect of the non-ulcer drug would manifest as an excess of individuals with the ulcer drug prescribed last. This screening method is robust to confounders that are stable over time.

RESULTS

Only non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-2.0), calcium blockers (RR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.7), corticosteroids (RR 1.1, CI 1.0-1.3), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (RR 1.4, CI 1.1-1.7) and methylxanthines (RR 1.5, CI 1.1-2.2) showed a significant asymmetry suggesting a dyspepsia-provoking effect. An analysis of effect modifiers suggested that the signals for corticosteroids and for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were explained by concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and by underlying congestive heart failure. The signal for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be explained by the known reputation of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs for causing ulcers.

CONCLUSION

There are hardly any important unknown drug effects that mimic acid related dyspepsia. Drug-induced dyspepsia contributes little to the overall use of ulcer drugs.

[NSAID and ulcer complications. An analysis of risk factors]

Use of NSAIDs is recognized as an important cause of peptic ulcer complications. The aim of this nested case-control study was to identify risk factors for NSAID-related ulcer complications. Cases were consecutive NSAID users admitted with an ulcer complication (n = 94), and controls were a random sample of all NSAID users without ulcer complication identified by a pharmaco-epidemiological database (n = 324). Risk factors for patients at start of NSAID-therapy were: high age: 60-75 yr; Odds Ratio (OR) 3.5 (95% CI: 1.8-7.0); > 75 yr: OR 8.8 (4.3-18.1); male sex: OR 1.7 (1.0-3.0); ulcer history: OR 2.5 (1.2-5.1); steroid treatment: OR 2.0 (0.8-4.6); smoking: OR 1.6 (0.9-2.7); alcohol use: OR 1.8 (0.9-3.6). Risk factors for patients on NSAID-therapy were: high age, male sex, ulcer history, and smoking, and furthermore dyspepsia: OR 2.1 (1.0-4.2), especially NSAID-related dyspepsia: OR 8.9 (4.1-19.2). Risk was lower for patients treated more than three months. In conclusion, risk measured from this design can be shown to correlate strongly with the rate difference, a measure that is more clinically relevant than conventional relative risk estimates. Strong risk factors for NSAID-related ulcer complication are high age, male sex, ulcer history, and dyspepsia related to the NSAID therapy.