Phase II trial of tamoxifen and goserelin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Endocrine therapy is a recognised option in the treatment of chemo-resistant ovarian cancer. We conducted a nonrandomised phase II evaluation of combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer that had recurred following chemotherapy. In total, 26 patients entered the study, of which 17 had platinum-resistant disease. The median age was 63 years and enrolled patients had received a median of three chemotherapy regimens prior to trial entry. Patients were given oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily on a continuous basis and subcutaneous goserelin 3.6 mg once a month until disease progression. Using the definition of endocrine response that included patients with stable disease (SD) of 6 months or greater, the overall response rate (clinical benefit rate) was 50%. This included one complete response (CR) (3.8%), two partial responses (PR) (7.7%) and 10 patients with SD (38.5%). The median progression-free interval (PFI) was 4 months (95% CI 2.4–9.6) while the median overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 5.5–30.6). Four patients received treatment for more than 2 years (range 1–31) and one of them is still on treatment. In none of the four patients was there any evidence of recurrent or cumulative treatment related toxicity. Treatment-limiting toxicity was not seen in any of the study population. Endocrine data demonstrated a marked suppression of luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to less than 4% of baseline values. No consistent correlation could be established between LH/FSH suppression and tumour response. Likewise no relationship was observed between Inhibin A/B and pro-alpha C levels and tumour response. Inhibin is unlikely to be a useful surrogate marker for response in locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer. Combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin is an active regimen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Hormonal therapy is advantageous in its relative lack of toxicity, ease of administration and tolerability, thus making it suitable for patients with heavily pretreated disease, compromised bone marrow function and other comorbid conditions that contraindicate cytotoxic therapy as well as in patients with indolent disease.

Oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge compared with in-patient intravenous antibiotics for low-risk febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: a prospective randomised controlled single centre study

Neutropenic sepsis remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy. However, it is possible to identify patients who are at low risk for serious complications and for whom less-intensive, more-convenient treatment may be appropriate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge in comparison with standard in-patient intravenous antibiotics in patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. In all, 126 episodes of low-risk neutropenic fever occurred in 102 patients. Patients were randomised to receive either: an oral regimen of ciprofloxacin (750 mg 12 hourly) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (675 mg 8 hourly) for a total of 5 days, or a standard intravenous regimen of gentamicin and tazocin (piperacillin/tazobactam) until hospital discharge. Patients randomised to oral antibiotics were eligible for discharge following 24 h of hospitalisation, if clinically stable and symptomatically improved. The efficacy of the two arms was similar: initial treatment was successful without antibiotic modification in 90% of episodes in the intravenous arm and 84.8% of episodes in the oral arm, P=0.55, absolute difference between the groups 5.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference -7 to 17.3%. Only one episode in the oral arm was associated with significant clinical deterioration: this occurred within the initial in-patient assessment period. The median in-patient stay was 4 days in the intravenous arm (range 2-8) and 2 days in the oral arm (range 1-16 days), P&<0.0005. The reduction in hospital stay led to significant cost-savings in the oral arm. In conclusion, this study suggests that oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge for patients who remain stable after a 24 h period of in-patient monitoring offers a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional management of low-risk neutropenic fever.

Randomized study of three different doses of suramin administered with a fixed dosing schedule in patients with advanced prostate cancer: results of intergroup 0159, cancer and leukemia group B 9480

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that the efficacy and toxicity of suramin in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer was dose dependent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized with equal probability to receive low-, intermediate-, or high-dose suramin (total doses 3.192, 5.320, and 7.661 g/m(2), respectively). Overall survival, time to progression, and response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and objective) for each treatment arm were compared. Relationships between plasma suramin concentrations and response, toxicity, and survival were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety patients were randomized. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose arms, the median survival time was 16, 14, and 13 months, respectively (P =.49). The objective response rate was 9%, 7%, and 15%, respectively (P =.10). PSA response rates were 24%, 28%, and 34%, respectively (P =.082). Landmark analyses of a 50% decline in PSA at 20 weeks showed a significant correlation with survival. There was a dose-response relationship between dose and toxicity. After adjusting for treatment arm, the measured suramin concentration was not associated with clinical response, PSA response, survival, or toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Although high-dose suramin was associated with higher objective and PSA response rates, these were not statistically significant. Overall, no dose-response relationship was observed for survival or progression-free survival, but toxicity was increased with the higher dose. Patients treated with the low-dose level experienced modest toxicity, making it the preferred arm on this study. The lack of a dose-response relationship and the toxicity profile observed raise questions regarding the utility of suramin, particularly high-dose suramin, as administered on this schedule.

Assessment and management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: developing guidelines

Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most important untreated symptoms of cancer, with a prevalence between 60 and 100%, but there has been a reluctance to prioritize fatigue and develop effective management strategies. The development of standards and guidelines will encourage a more systematic approach and help to stimulate further research. The Mersey Palliative Care Audit Group has developed guidelines for the assessment and management of fatigue. These guidelines were produced following a regional survey, which looked at both the educational needs of nurses, and the impact of fatigue on patients with advanced cancer.

A phase I trial of a 5-day schedule of intravenous topotecan and etoposide in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase I dose-escalation study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the intravenous combination of topotecan and etoposide in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Nineteen patients were treated with 30-min infusions of topotecan (0.5 mg/m(2)/day for cohort 1; 0.75 mg/m(2)/day for cohort 2) followed by 1-hour infusions of a fixed daily dose of etoposide (60 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patient cohort 1 (n = 7) received a total of 41 courses of chemotherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred after 17% of the courses of therapy, and there was 1 episode of dose-limiting toxicity in this patient cohort. In patient cohort 2 (n = 12), a total of 64 courses of chemotherapy were administered. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred following 41 and 37% of the courses of therapy, respectively. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred following 19% of the courses of therapy, and there were 3 episodes of dose-limiting toxicity in this patient cohort. There were no toxic deaths, and all nonhematologic toxicity (except hair loss) was </= grade 2. No further dose escalation was performed because of the degree of myelosuppression seen in patient cohort 2. All 19 patients were evaluable for response. Eighteen (95%) patients responded (14 partial responses and 4 complete responses) and the median survival was 10 months. This 5-day schedule of intravenous topotecan and etoposide administered sequentially on the same day is well tolerated, and the preliminary response rates were high in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer.

A new ultrasensitive assay for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma

Nucleic acid-based diagnostic assays for the quantitation of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels are used to monitor disease progression and the response of patients to antiretroviral drug therapy. The LCx HIV RNA Quantitative Assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) is an assay for the quantitation of HIV type 1 RNA in plasma that uses competitive reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) followed by Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay, and includes an internal control for inhibition and RNA recovery, that is taken through the entire sample preparation procedure. The performance of the assay was assessed for 1 and 0.2 ml sample volumes. For a 1 ml sample volume, the lower limit of detection was found to be 50 copies/ml with a linear range from 50 to 1 million copies/ml. For a 0.2 ml sample volume, the lower limit of detection was found to be 178 copies/ml with a linear range from 178 to 5 million copies/ml. The assay is able to detect and quantitate HIV subtypes A-G and group O. LCx HIV RNA assay quantitation results are highly correlated to the standard and ultrasensitive Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay (Roche Molecular Systems) quantitation results. Assay performance is consistent with the use of this test for routine quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma.