Asian innovation in pharmaceutical and medical device industry - beyond tomorrow

The Asian region has passed a long and rocky road during the past several decades to establish itself as the second leading regional biotech market globally. China has become the second largest pharmaceutical market while Japan holds a strong second position as the global hub for medical devices development and innovation. Pharmaceutical expenditure continues to outpace real GDP growth in most of these countries. The trend is likely to be continued for a decade ahead, driven by a myriad of factors ranging from aging populations, rapidly growing welfare and increased citizen expectations raising demand for novel medicines and technologies. Satisfaction of these unmet needs in terms of supply is coming from the large multinational companies in wealthier among these societies. Domestic born and largely state-owned manufacturing industries continue to play a crucial role in an array of middle-income countries. Global biotech hub of Singapore is hosting over 1.5 times more headquarters of large pharmaceutical companies than Beijing, Tokyo, Shanghai and Hong Kong combined together. Japanese Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo and Otsuka and Chinese Sinopharm, Guangzhou Pharmaceuticals Corporation, SPH and Yunnan Baiyao are now enlisted in leading Top 25 pharmaceutical companies rankings as per their annual net revenues in 2020-2021. Global industry landscape is evolving with ever more Asian companies obtaining the sharp innovative competitiveness leading development of cutting-edge medical technologies. Asian societies demand for pharmaceuticals and medical services continue to be characterized with unmet needs and striving to increase supply capacities. Financial obstacles of affordability of life saving medicines to the ordinary citizens shall be gradually overcome with an array of reimbursement strategies and extended insurance coverage policies. Observing the broad landscape throughout Asian region, we may witness that optimism in terms of domestic real GDP growth and consecutive biotech industry forecasts remains firmly rooted in years to come. Biosimilars are not a focus of the paper.

Budget Impact Analysis of the Introduction of Subcutaneous Infliximab (CT-P13 SC) for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC)-the first and only SC version of infliximab-is approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This new mode of infliximab administration will allow patients to self-inject at home, significantly reducing the number of outpatient visits and costs of intravenous (IV) administration. This paper describes the economic impact of introducing CT-P13 SC to the market from the UK societal perspective.

OBJECTIVE

The budget impact analysis was conducted to assess the financial impact of the adoption of CT-P13 SC over a 5-year period.

METHODS

A prevalence-based budget impact model was developed incorporating epidemiological data, administration cost data, and market share data. The analysis compared a "world with" CT-P13 SC scenario to a "world without" CT-P13 SC. A sensitivity analysis included dose escalation up to 4.1 mg/kg to reflect the real-world care delivery setting.

RESULTS

Compared to the "world without" scenario, the introduction of CT-P13 SC resulted in cost savings of ₤69.3 million in the UK over a 5-year period. In the scenario analysis, the saving increased to ₤173.5 million over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Use of CT-P13 SC may lead to substantial cost savings for the UK society.

Changes in Medicare Part B Spending for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Entry Into the Market

This cross-sectional study describes changes in annual Medicare Part B spending for biologic drugs after biosimilar entry, focusing on the first 4 products to experience biosimilar competition: filgrastim, infliximab, epoetin alpha, and pegfilgrastim.

Evidence-based public policy making for medicines across countries: findings and implications for the future

Aim: Global expenditure on medicines is rising up to 6% per year driven by increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and new premium priced medicines for cancer, orphan diseases and other complex areas. This is difficult to sustain without reforms. Methods: Extensive narrative review of published papers and contextualizing the findings to provide future guidance. Results: New models are being introduced to improve the managed entry of new medicines including managed entry agreements, fair pricing approaches and monitoring prescribing against agreed guidance. Multiple measures have also successfully been introduced to improve the prescribing of established medicines. This includes encouraging greater prescribing of generics and biosimilars versus originators and patented medicines in a class to conserve resources without compromising care. In addition, reducing inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Typically, multiple measures are the most effective. Conclusion: Multiple measures will be needed to attain and retain universal healthcare.

Knowledge, perceptions, attitude, barriers and facilitators of biosimilars use across specialty physicians and hospital pharmacists: A national survey

OBJECTIVE

To analyze knowledge, perceptions, attitude, barriers and facilitators of biosimilars uptake across physicians managing immune diseases and hospital pharmacists.

METHOD

Two structured and closed anonymous online surveys were designed and sent to 41 physicians (rheumatologists, dermatologists, gastroenterologists) and 32 hospital pharmacists.  Sociodemographic and clinical practice related variables were collected. We also gathered information about biosimilars knowledge and importance,  access, attitude in clinical practice and perceptions, barriers and facilitators to biosimilars uptake. A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Surveys response rate was 100% (hospital pharmacists) and 96% (physicians). We found certain lack of biosimilars knowledge  about key aspects including switching, extrapolation, interchangeability or  substitution. There was a great variability in the types and brands of  biosimilars depending on the hospital. We observed several organization  preferences, policies, and practices regarding biosimilars. General  perception and attitude to biosimilars was positive. If used, biosimilars  were predominantly prescribed in biologic treatment-naive patients (this  indication was considered adequate and participants felt comfortable with  it). Reluctance to switch in clinical practice was common. The main  barriers to biosimilars uptake were the lack of confidence and knowledge.  The main facilitators were the development of recommendations from  professional associations and societies and the demonstration of  interchangeability efficacy. We gathered concerns about biosimilar long  term efficacy and safety, lack of real-life data, lack of biosimilars  traceability or the risk of biologic reference medicines stock shortages.

CONCLUSIONS

Biosimilar education and more evidence filling current gaps  might help increase prescriber knowledge, comfort and use of biosimilars.

Statistically Significant versus Practically Relevant Trend in Stability Data

How to decide whether a statistically significant trend is of practical relevance? In the context of stability data of pharmaceuticals, this publication provides a way forward to use different measures of (method) variability to compare to the observed changes over time. A panel of analytical experts assessed whether statistically significant trends were of practical relevance or not. For different types of assessing variability, recommendations for decision criteria were derived that best matched these assessments, i.e., finding a suited balance between not detecting a relevant trend and between flagging a trend wrongly as relevant. For this purpose, more than 60 data sets from Biosimilar projects of Sandoz/Novartis were leveraged. Hence, this article provides a scientific way to assess whether a statistically significant trend is of practical relevance or not, and a case study is presented and discussed.

Comparability of Biologics: Global Principles, Evidentiary Consistency and Unrealized Reliance

The principles of comparability assessments have been accepted globally as offering sensitive and reliable tools with which to evaluate potential changes to biologics that may arise either through processing changes or through the creation of a copy (biosimilar) by a different sponsor. The comparability approach has evolved through systematic advances in four areas: clear and convergent guidelines for evaluation of potential changes to biologics; risk-based systems of weighting analytical data; progressive improvements in analytical methods; and advanced understanding of post-translational modifications. Routine regulatory expectations for clinical equivalence data are being reevaluated, as they seldom contribute to the assessment of similarity. Similarly, we show that requirements to compare biosimilars and locally sourced versions of their reference products are of questionable scientific value and represent a double standard by comparison with the invariable acceptance of the clinical profiles of novel biologics without reference to their sources. The consistent application of evidentiary standards for comparability to all biologics offers an opportunity for regulators to curtail their own assessments of new biosimilars and instead to recognize comparability assessments made in another jurisdiction (reliance), thereby gaining important efficiencies in the regulatory review of biosimilars and improving the competitiveness of the biosimilars market. Such consistency can also enhance the confidence of all stakeholders, especially patients and their providers, in all biologics.

The Impact of Introducing Successive Biosimilars on Changes in Prices of Adalimumab, Infliximab, and Trastuzumab-Polish Experiences

Biosimilars are cheaper than original drugs and are thus of interest to the public. The aim of this article is to assess the benefits of introducing more than one biosimilar for the same substance (active pharmaceutical ingredient, API). The hypothesis is that the introduction of successive biosimilars of a specific original drug reduces the price of the selected API. The study focuses on drug prices varying with the successive arrival of new biosimilars. Three drugs that have at least three reimbursed biosimilars on the market were selected, two from the same therapeutic group (adalimumab and infliximab) and one (trastuzumab) representing another class of drugs. The following data were analyzed: price variation after the introduction of the first, second, and third biosimilar, and the average price reduction for all three biosimilars. Additionally, a literature review was conducted. The reimbursement of each new biosimilar is beneficial since it is associated with a price reduction in percentage terms. However, the first biosimilar brought about the greatest savings due to the higher initial prices of the original drugs and to Polish reimbursement rules. This article is helpful for when taking healthcare decisions regarding the pricing of and reimbursement for new biosimilars.

The global landscape of availability, accessibility and affordability of essential diagnostics and therapeutics for the management of HER2-positive breast cancer: The ONCOLLEGE-001 survey

AIM OF THE STUDY

Barriers in access to essential care are key determinants of disparities in cancer survival. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and lead cause of mortality among women, 60 % occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMs). A quarter of BC are characterized by an over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Valuable strategies to diagnose and manage patients with HER2-positive BC have been determined and some considered essential health interventions. ONCOLLEGE-001 is a global survey of availability, accessibility, and affordability of essential HER2 diagnostics and therapeutics.

METHOD

A self-administered questionnaire was shared electronically to oncologists, identified from oncology networks. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, per income areas and geographic regions.

RESULTS

We received 191 responses (84 % response rate). The majority of the responders were from LMs (n = 153) and were physician providers. Immunohistochemistry was the most common HER2 diagnostics available (n = 185). A third of the responders from low/lower-middle and a half of upper-middle income countries had HER2 testing only in the private sector. Trastuzumab was not available for 8 %: when available, 15%-21% reported accessibility only as out-of-pocket expenditure; when not reimbursed, only 10 % of the providers could significantly offer this intervention. Availability of trastuzumab biosimilars was reported in more than a half of the responders (n = 107).

CONCLUSION

Stark disparities are reported, with high out-of-pocket expenses for HER2 testing and significant financial barriers to access trastuzumab treatments. Policy solutions are urgently warranted for the selection, prioritization, and reimbursement of essential health interventions, to result in improved population health. POLICY SUMMARY STATEMENT: the inclusion of essential services for cancer management should be assured and financed in the benefit packages of healthcare to all. Prioritizing high-value health interventions, including medicines and medical devices, is critical to deliver impactful programs on population health.

Efficacy and safety of follitropin alpha biosimilars compared to their reference product: a Meta-analysis

AIM

Recently published multicentre, randomized phase III studies suggested the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilar follitropin alpha medicaments compared to the reference product. The aim of this meta-analysis is to pool the results of the three phase III trials in order to provide an overall analysis about the clinical bioequivalence between biosimilars and the originator.

METHODS

The studies included in the analysis were pooled together in order to estimate the log odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes and the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) by using a random effects model. The heterogeneity between the studies was evaluated with the Higgins and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

No differences were found in term of number of oocytes retrieved at ovum pick-up, the primary endpoint recommended by the European Medicines Agency. No statistical differences were also found for biochemical pregnancy rate, take home baby rate, total follitropin alpha dose, duration of stimulation, and OHSS risk. A significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (p = .03) was observed in the originator group in comparison to the biosimilar follitropin alpha.

CONCLUSION

Biosimilar follitropin alpha medicaments resulted comparable in comparison to the reference product with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, that is the primary endpoint recommended by the European Medicines Agency .Further study is needed to evaluate the therapeutic bioequivalence between follitropin alpha biosimilar and the reference medication with respect to secondary endpoints.

Do pharmaceutical prices rise anticipating branded competition?

Growth in pharmaceutical prices is a major policy issue in the United States. Competition is encouraged to counteract such growth, yet less is known about the effect of brand competition on prices. We discover a unique feature of this market by studying the pricing strategies of incumbent drug manufacturers under tiered-insurance anticipating branded competition. Using the insulin market as a natural experiment, we exploit exogenous variation in several potential entrants' completion of clinical trials to identify the effect of drug pipeline pressure on the prices of incumbent drugs. We find that pipeline pressure exerts cumulative and significant upward pressure on prices of incumbent drugs. In the insulin market such pressure explained 10.5% of the growth of prices. We were able to replicate these findings among incumbents with other emerging biosimilars. Insurance designs that fail to promote price competition through negotiations and value-based principles may contribute to such price increases.

Overview of Humira® Biosimilars: Current European Landscape and Future Implications

Humira® (adalimumab) by AbbVie has been the top-selling biologic drug product for the last few years - reaching nearly $20 billion in annual sales in 2018. Upon the October 2018 release of four adalimumab biosimilars into the European market, those sales began to shrink. By the end of 2019, the annual sales of Humira®, albeit still high, dipped closer to $19 billion as nearly 35% of European patients had been switched from Humira® to a biosimilar. Diminishing sales are expected to continue as the adoption of adalimumab biosimilars increases in Europe and Humira®'s patent protection is lost in the United States come 2023. In this review we discuss how impactful the availability of biosimilars has been to the European adalimumab market approximately two years after their release. We further analyze the marketed biosimilars with regards to differences in their formulation, delivery devices, biological activity, physicochemical properties, clinical trials data, and current financial foothold. More importantly, though, we highlight how "similar" these biosimilars are to Humira®. In doing so, we seek to educate the public on what they may be able to expect once adalimumab biosimilars enter the United States market in 2023.

Design and Analysis of a Biosimilar Bridging Study with a Prediction Interval-Based Consistency Test

The development of biosimilars has substantially increased in recent years. A biosimilar is a biological product which is highly similar to a licensed biological product (reference product), with no clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar and the reference product. A bridging study is a viable strategy to bring an approved biosimilar product from the original region(s) to new regions or countries. While the bridging concept and the principles of conducting bridging studies for innovative products outlined in ICH E5 guidance are informative for biosimilar development, existing statistical strategies for designing and analyzing a bridging study may not be directly applicable when the biosimilar global study compares the biosimilar product to a reference product as control. In this paper, we present a novel and practical statistical methodology for designing and analyzing a biosimilar bridging study based on a prediction interval-based consistency test for assessing consistency between the bridging study and the biosimilar global study. We prove analytically that the method has the desired statistical properties (i.e., high power when the two studies are perfectly consistent or nearly consistent in efficacy and type I error control when the two studies are clearly inconsistent in efficacy). We present a numerical example to illustrate that the implementation of the method is straightforward in practice. We also discuss the application of the method to various endpoints and metrics.

Accelerated Repurposing and Drug Development of Pulmonary Hypertension Therapies for COVID-19 Treatment Using an AI-Integrated Biosimulation Platform

The COVID-19 pandemic has reached over 100 million worldwide. Due to the multi-targeted nature of the virus, it is clear that drugs providing anti-COVID-19 effects need to be developed at an accelerated rate, and a combinatorial approach may stand to be more successful than a single drug therapy. Among several targets and pathways that are under investigation, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and specifically angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and Ca²⁺-mediated SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry and replication are noteworthy. A combination of ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), a critical line of therapy for pulmonary hypertension, has shown therapeutic relevance in COVID-19 when investigated independently. To that end, we conducted in silico modeling using BIOiSIM, an AI-integrated mechanistic modeling platform by utilizing known preclinical in vitro and in vivo datasets to accurately simulate systemic therapy disposition and site-of-action penetration of the CCBs and ACEi compounds to tissues implicated in COVID-19 pathogenesis.

High level of IgE in acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss: A predictor for recurrence and Meniere Disease transformation

BACKGROUND

Autoimmunity may play an important role in sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss. However, little is known about the relationship between immunoglobulin E (IgE) and acute low-tone sensorinerual hearing loss (ALHL).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between IgE level and endolymphatic hydrops and outcomes of ALHL.

METHODS

A total of 242 subjects with sudden onset hearing loss, including 115 with ALHL and 127 with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL), were included in this study. Peripheral venous blood samples of 242 subjects were collected for detection. Clinical data, IgE level, and distribution of allergens were compared between the ALHL and ISSHL groups. The ALHL group received an electrocochleogram (ECochG) test and a follow-up in the outpatient unit or by telephone to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared to the values in the ISSHL group, a significantly younger onset age (42.30±14.33 years old), higher female onset proportion (72/115, 62.61%), increased total IgE level (median: 66.47, interquartile range: 24.56, 180.96, IU/mL) and specific IgE level (median: 9.42, interquartile range: 1.42, 22.23 IU/mL) were noted in the ALHL group. A clear difference in allergen distribution was noted between the ALHL and ISSHL groups (p=.001). Total IgE and specific IgE levels were factors that contributed to the SP/AP ratio in the electrocochleogram (ECochG) (R²=0.413) in ALHL group. Finally, during the follow-up (17.61±3.46 months) for the ALHL group, 37 subjects recurred, and 17 subjects developed Meniere Disease. In the ROC curve for ALHL recurrence, the area under the curve (AUC) of total IgE was 0.709 and that of specific IgE was 0.679. For MD transformation, the AUC of total IgE was 0.736 and that of specific IgE was 0.716.

CONCLUSIONS

High IgE levels correlated with an enhanced SP/AP ratio in ALHL. High IgE levels could be used as a predictor of ALHL recurrence and MD transformation.

[State of art and new perspectives in the induction regimen of ANCA-associated vasculitis with renal involvement: from histopathology to therapy]

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are rare autoimmune diseases characterised by medium and small vessels inflammation. Renal vasculitic involvement is one of the most severe manifestations, with high mortality in case of a delayed diagnosis and a significant impact on patients' long-term prognosis. Histological classifications and scores for the definition of renal involvement in AAV exist and correlate with the renal outcome. Current induction regimen consists of a high dose of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs: cyclophosphamide (CYC), rituximab (RTX) or a combination of both. RTX use is expanding thanks to randomised control trials suggesting its non-inferiority compared to the standard CYC therapy in general AAV and a better safety profile; its cost has also reduced thanks to the availability of biosimilars. However, the equivalence of RTX and CYC in patients with severe renal involvement is still debated. The quest for the ideal induction regimen in AAV is moving towards a more personalized approach: on the one hand, efforts are made to use already existing therapies in the most appropriate way; on the other, new insights into AAV pathogenesis has allowed the discovery of new targets, such as the complement factor C5a. Thanks to this new AAV management, renal outcome and overall survival has visibly improved. New studies are needed to reach a more personalized approach in the induction regimen of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis and AAV in general.

Assessment of Treatment Safety and Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Etanercept Biosimilar for Autoimmune Arthritis (ASQA): A Multicenter Post-marketing Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

Phase IV post-marketing surveillance studies are needed to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of drug products. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of biosimilar etanercept (Altebrel, AryoGen Co., Iran) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study, 583 patients received biosimilar etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly and were followed up to 12 months. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of biosimilar etanercept by documenting all the adverse events in the case report forms throughout the study period. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of biosimilar etanercept in study patients, where longitudinal changes in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), pain, and disease activity scores were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 583 patients (44.80 ± 13.09 years of age) were included and followed for an average of 8.12 ± 3.96 months. Among all patients, 172 (29.50%) experienced at least one adverse event, and injection site reaction, abdominal pain, and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common. HAQ scores decreased from 1.32 ± 0.77 at baseline to 0.81 ± 0.61 at 12 months in patients with RA/PsA (p < 0.01) and from 0.82 ± 0.58 at baseline to 0.66 ± 0.63 at 12 months in patients with AS (p = 0.18). Pain scores decreased from 6.49 ± 2.41 at baseline to 3.51 ± 2.39 at 12 months (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated the real-world safety and effectiveness of biosimilar etanercept in patients with RA, PsA, and AS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04582084.

Clinical efficacy and safety of Razumab® (CESAR) study: Our experience with the world's first biosimilar Ranibizumab

Purpose

: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Razumab (the biosimilar Ranibizumab by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) for the treatment of chorioretinal vascular diseases such as diabetic macular edema (DME), choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study, including patients with DME, CNVM, and RVO, who had received treatment with Razumab® between October 2018 and September 2019. Primary outcome measures were the changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) from baseline to 1 month and 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP) at day 1, any signs of ocular inflammation or systemic adverse events during the follow-up.

Results

: One hundred and fifty-three eyes of 141 patients were analyzed. The indications included DME in 70 (45.8%) eyes, CNVM in 70 (45.8%) eyes, and RVO in 13 (8.4%) eyes. Mean CDVA improved from baseline (0.62 ± 0.44) to month 1 (0.45 ± 0.42) and maintained till 3 months (0.42 ± 0.44; P < 0.001). Mean CFT showed significant reduction from baseline (405.68 ± 192.422 μm) to month 1 (286.08 ± 118.36 μm) and month 3 (271 ± 104.24 μm; P < 0.001). None of the eyes recorded IOP >20 mmHg on day 1. No evidence of ocular toxicity or systemic adverse event was noted.

Conclusion

: Razumab® showed a rapid improvement in CDVA and CFT in most of the eyes with efficacy observed as early as 1 month and maintained till 3 months. The biosimilar Ranibizumab can be a safe and effective low-cost drug for treating macular diseases.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilar (CT-P10) in IgG4-related disease: an observational prospective open-label cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab is increasingly used in IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) but high costs limit its wide off-label administration. European and US regulatory agencies have recently approved rituximab biosimilars for the treatment of different rheumatologic and hematological conditions. No data are available, yet, on the efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars for the treatment of IgG4-RD. Scope of the present work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (RTX-B) in patients with IgG4-RD.

METHODS

Patients with active IgG4-RD, naïve to rituximab or switched from the originator (RTX-O) to the biosimilar were treated with RTX-B and prospectively followed-up for 18 months. Safety and efficacy were assessed at six months. Relapse rate was assessed at 18 months. Disease activity was assessed by means of the IgG4-RD Responder Index (IgG4-RD RI).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in this study. Thirty-three patients (87%) were naïve to RTX. Five patients (13%) relapsed after RTX-O and were switched to RTX-B. After six months, 21 patients (60%) achieved disease remission. The median serum IgG4 concentration decreased from 1344 to 575 mg/L (p < 0.01), and the median IgG4-RD RI decreased from 7.5 to 0 (p < 0.01). B-cell depletion was observed in all patients. Eight patients (36%) relapsed within 18 months. Side effects related to RTX-B administration were observed in 14 patients (37%). These results are in line with our previous experience with RTX-O.

CONCLUSIONS

The (Truxima^TM) rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 represents a safe and effective alternative to rituximab originator for the treatment of IgG4-RD.

Biosimilar pegfilgrastim may offer affordable treatment options for patients in France: a budget impact analysis on the basis of clinical trial and real-world data

BACKGROUND

NYVEPRIA, a pegfilgrastim (a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) biosimilar, was recently recommended for marketing authorization in Europe for decreasing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs. The present study aimed to evaluate the financial impact of introducing a new pegfilgrastim biosimilar from a French healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

An Excel-based budget impact model was developed to estimate the financial impact by introducing a new pegfilgrastim biosimilar (NYVEPRIA) to France over a 5-year time horizon. Comparators included existing long-acting and short-acting G-CSFs. The burden of FN was obtained from existing literature. Costs (2021 Euros) included drug acquisition and administration, estimated based on drug dosage in both clinical trial and real-world settings. Scenario analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of key model assumptions.

RESULTS

In a total French population of 67.19 million, 79,873 patients were estimated to be treated with G-CSFs annually. The annual number of patients to be treated with NYVEPRIA was estimated to be 1593, 3195, 3674, 3782, and 4052 in years 1 to 5, respectively. Using real-world data, NYVEPRIA resulted in total annual cost savings of €8,620, €868,498, €868,498, €814,102, and €958,952 over years 1 to 5, respectively, leading to a cumulative 5-year cost savings of €3,518,669. Using data from clinical trials, NYVEPRIA resulted in total annual cost savings of €14,366, €1,447,496, €1,447,496, €1,356,836, and €1,598,253 over years 1 to 5, respectively, leading to a cumulative 5-year cost savings of €5,864,448.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a new pegfilgrastim biosimilar (NYVEPRIA) is potentially associated with substantial cost savings for the French healthcare system.

Promoting Competition in Drug Pricing: A Review of Recent Congressional Legislation

Brand-name prescription drug manufacturers use various strategies to extend their market exclusivity periods by delaying generic or biosimilar competition. Recent Congressional legislation has targeted four such tactics. We analyze these proposals and assess their likely effect on competition in the U.S. drug market.

Effect of a novel animal milk oligosaccharide biosimilar on macronutrient digestibility and gastrointestinal tolerance, fecal metabolites, and fecal microbiota of healthy adult cats

GNU100 is a novel animal milk oligosaccharide (AMO) biosimilar. In a recent in vitro fermentation study, GNU100 was shown to be fermentable by feline gastrointestinal microbiota and lead to increased short-chain fatty acid production. Our objectives herein were to evaluate the palatability, safety, and gastrointestinal tolerance of GNU100 in healthy adult cats. Exploratory end-points were measured to assess utility. In study 1, 20 adult cats were used to test the palatability of diets containing 0% or 1% GNU100. In study 2, 32 (mean age = 1.9 yr; mean body weight = 4.6 kg) male (n = 12) and female (n = 20) adult cats were used in a completely randomized design. After a 2-wk baseline, cats were assigned to one of the following treatment groups and fed for 26 wk: control (CT, no GNU100), low dose (LD, 0.5% GNU100), medium dose (MD, 1.0% GNU100), and high dose (HD, 1.5% GNU100). On weeks 2, 4, and 26, fresh fecal samples were collected for the measurement of stool quality and immune and inflammatory markers and on weeks 2 and 4 for microbiota and metabolites. On week 4, total feces were collected to measure apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility. On weeks 2, 4, and 26, blood samples were collected for serum chemistry, hematology, and inflammatory marker measurement. The palatability test showed that 1% GNU100 was strongly preferred (P < 0.05), with GNU100 having a 17.6:1 consumption ratio compared with control. In the long-term study, all cats remained healthy, without any signs of gastrointestinal intolerance or illness. All diets were well accepted, resulting in similar (P > 0.05) food intake, fecal characteristics, immunoglobulin A, and calprotectin, and dry matter, organic matter, fat, and crude protein digestibilities. Fecal butyrate was greater (P = 0.02) in cats fed HD than cats fed LD or MD. Fecal indole was lower (P = 0.02) in cats fed HD than cats fed LD. Cats fed CT had a higher (P = 0.003) relative abundance of Actinobacteria than cats fed LD. The relative abundance of Peptococcus was impacted by diet and time. At 4 wk, Campylobacter was lower in fecal samples of cats fed HD. Overall, the data suggest that dietary GNU100 supplementation was highly palatable, well tolerated, did not cause detrimental effects on fecal quality or nutrient digestibility, increased fecal butyrate concentrations, and reduced fecal indole concentrations, supporting the safety of GNU100 for inclusion in feline diets and suggesting potential benefits on gastrointestinal health of cats.