Association Between Specific Mutations in KRAS Codon 12 and Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Regional and Gender-Based Distribution of KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in Turkey: An Observational Study

Background and Objectives: KRAS genes are among the most prominent oncogenes that trigger tumor formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) and serve as predictive biomarkers for resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the prevalence and mutation spectrum of the KRAS gene family in mCRC patients in Turkey have not been sufficiently analyzed. This study investigates the frequency and distribution of mutations in the KRAS gene family across different regions of Turkey and examines gender-related variations. Materials and Methods: This multicenter observational study included 2458 histologically confirmed mCRC patients collected from 52 centers across Turkey. In a central laboratory, KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests and Monte Carlo simulations, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Results: Depending on the region, KRAS mutations were detected in 45% of patients, ranging from 39.6% to 47.5%. The mutation rate was significantly higher in female patients (48.8%) compared to male patients (42.6%) (p = 0.002). Codon 12 mutations were more frequent than codon 13 mutations. G12D, G12V, and G13D mutations accounted for 80% of all detected mutations. The G12V mutation was prevalent in female patients (p = 0.007). Based on region, mutation diversity was similar, and no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This large-scale, multicenter study provides the most comprehensive dataset of KRAS mutations in mCRC patients in Turkey. This study revealed regional trends, as well as gender differences. The findings highlight the importance of routine KRAS genotyping in guiding personalized treatment strategies, especially regarding candidate selection for anti-EGFR therapies. Further research is required to elucidate the prognostic and therapeutic implications of specific KRAS mutations.

Associations of KRAS Point Mutations with Survival of Patients Who Underwent Curative-Intent Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The oncologic significance of specific KRAS point mutations for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of KRAS point mutations on patients who underwent surgery for CLM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for CLM from 2001 to 2020 were selected for the study. In the study, KRAS point mutations and other clinicopathologic variables were examined for association with survival.

RESULTS

The study classified 798 patients into five groups by KRAS mutation status as follows: wild-type (n = 412, 51.6%), G12D (n = 123, 15.4%), G12V (n = 88, 11.0%), G13D (n = 61, 7.6%), and "Other" mutations (n = 114, 14.3%). For the patients with G12V substitutions, TP53 mutation was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-6.66; P = 0.041), but was not associated with a survival difference for the other four groups. The patients with co-occurring KRAS G12V and TP53 had a median OS of 4.4 years and a 5-year OS rate of 39.8%. In contrast, the patients with KRAS G12V mutation and wild-type TP53 had a median OS of 7.3 years and a 5-year OS rate of 75.9%, similar to the corresponding values for the patients with wild-type KRAS. Co-occurring KRAS G12V and TP53 mutations were independently associated with worse OS in the entire cohort (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.15-3.76; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that KRAS G12V mutation is associated with worse OS for patients undergoing curative-intent CLM resection, but only those with co-occurring TP53 mutation. Prognosis after surgery for CLM should not be stratified by KRAS mutation site alone.

The impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status on local tumor progression after surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation was reported to adversely affect local tumor control after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastasis. Nevertheless, the effect of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation on surgical ablation has not been investigated in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation on local recurrence after surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved study of patients who underwent surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastasis between 2005 and 2023 at a single center and underwent Kirsten rat sarcoma testing with ≥1 year follow-up. Local recurrence was analyzed using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients with 424 lesions fulfilled inclusion criteria. Fifty (30.7%) patients received radiofrequency ablation and 113 (69.3%) patients received microwave ablation. Fifty-seven patients (32.2%) with 177 lesions were found to have a Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation had a larger number of tumors, percentage of posteriorly located tumors, and tumor burden score compared with those with wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma. Nevertheless, there was no difference between the groups regarding local recurrence per lesion (15% vs 17%, respectively, P = not significant). Independent predictors of local recurrence included tumor size, ablation margin, and blood vessel proximity for radiofrequency ablation compared with tumor size and ablation margin for microwave ablation.

CONCLUSION

There was no effect of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutations on local recurrence after surgical radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastasis in this study. Tumor size and ablation margin remained as independent predictors.

Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objective: The prognostic value of specific hot-spot mutations within KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) genes remains debatable. This study explores whether certain KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations are associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in mCRC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of 494 patients with mCRC treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2016 and July 2023. Data on genetic mutations and clinicopathological features were collected for this analysis. We estimated survival probabilities and conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of specific mutations on all-cause mortality risk. Results:KRAS c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val) and c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys) mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population and the treated mCRC subgroup. KRAS c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the treated mCRC subgroup but BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population. No significant association was observed between NRAS mutations and mortality risk in mCRC, possibly due to their lower frequency or different biological effects compared to KRAS and BRAF mutations. Conclusions: These findings suggest that specific KRAS [c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val), c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys), and c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)] and BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutations may have prognostic value in mCRC. However, given the single-center study design and lack of direct therapeutic implications, larger multicenter studies are needed to substantiate these results and better define the clinical relevance of these mutations.

Invasion and metastasis in cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic targets

The progression of malignant tumors leads to the development of secondary tumors in various organs, including bones, the brain, liver, and lungs. This metastatic process severely impacts the prognosis of patients, significantly affecting their quality of life and survival rates. Research efforts have consistently focused on the intricate mechanisms underlying this process and the corresponding clinical management strategies. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of the biological foundations of tumor metastasis, identification of pivotal signaling pathways, and systematic evaluation of existing and emerging therapeutic strategies are paramount to enhancing the overall diagnostic and treatment capabilities for metastatic tumors. However, current research is primarily focused on metastasis within specific cancer types, leaving significant gaps in our understanding of the complex metastatic cascade, organ-specific tropism mechanisms, and the development of targeted treatments. In this study, we examine the sequential processes of tumor metastasis, elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving organ-tropic metastasis, and systematically analyze therapeutic strategies for metastatic tumors, including those tailored to specific organ involvement. Subsequently, we synthesize the most recent advances in emerging therapeutic technologies for tumor metastasis and analyze the challenges and opportunities encountered in clinical research pertaining to bone metastasis. Our objective is to offer insights that can inform future research and clinical practice in this crucial field.

Prognostic Implications of Codon-Specific KRAS Mutations in Localized and Advanced Stages of Pancreatic Cancer

Introduction

While KRAS mutations represent the primary oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the association between codon-specific alterations and patient outcomes remains poorly elucidated, largely due to a lack of datasets coupling genomic profiling with rich clinical annotations across disease stages.

Patients and Methods

We utilized AACR's GENIE Biopharma Consortium Pancreas v1.2 dataset to test the associating of codon-specific KRAS mutations with clinicogenomic features and patient outcomes in PDAC patients diagnosed with localized (stages I-III) and advanced disease (stage IV). Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.

Results

Among 1,032 eligible patients, 949 (92%) exhibited mutant KRAS . These mutations were predominantly observed at G12D (n=390, 41%), G12V (n=305, 32%), and G12R (n=149, 16%). In the group of patients who presented with localized disease, those with G12V mutation had notably longer survival compared to G12D mutation ( P = 0.002). In contrast, patients with G12V mutation who presented with metastatic disease experienced shorter overall survival compared to those with G12R ( P = 0.005), and G12D mutations ( P = 0.009). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the frequencies of co-altered driver genes, including TP53 , CDKN2A , and SMAD4 , across the different KRAS mutations.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrated that codon-specific KRAS mutations impact PDAC outcomes differently based on disease stage at diagnosis. As studies testing KRAS inhibitors continue to emerge and mature, these data offer important contextual insights regarding survival outcomes associated with codon-specific KRAS mutations based on existing therapeutic approaches.

Role of silent mutations in KRAS -mutant tumors

ABSTRACT

Silent mutations within the RAS  gene have garnered increasing attention for their potential roles in tumorigenesis and therapeutic strategies. Kirsten-RAS ( KRAS ) mutations, predominantly oncogenic, are pivotal drivers in various cancers. While extensive research has elucidated the molecular mechanisms and biological consequences of active KRAS  mutations, the functional significance of silent mutations remains relatively understudied. This review synthesizes current knowledge on KRAS  silent mutations, highlighting their impact on cancer development. Silent mutations, which do not alter protein sequences but can affect RNA stability and translational efficiency, pose intriguing questions regarding their contribution to tumor biology. Understanding these mutations is crucial for comprehensively unraveling KRAS -driven oncogenesis and exploring novel therapeutic avenues. Moreover, investigations into the clinical implications of silent mutations in KRAS -mutant tumors suggest potential diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Despite being in early stages, research on KRAS  silent mutations holds promise for uncovering novel insights that could inform personalized cancer treatments. In conclusion, this review underscores the evolving landscape of KRAS  silent mutations, advocating for further exploration to bridge fundamental biology with clinical applications in oncology.

The KRAS G12D mutation increases the risk of unresectable recurrence of resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis

PURPOSE

Unresectable recurrence is a critical predictor of outcomes for colorectal cancer patients. We attempted to identify the prognostic factors, especially for unresectable recurrence-free survival (URFS) as a new endpoint, in patients with resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLOM).

METHODS

We investigated patients with resectable CRLOM, who underwent an R0 resection for both CRC and CRLOM between January, 2014 and March, 2019 at a single institution. The exclusion criteria were patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, the absence of data for genetic analyses, and the presence of multiple cancers, synchronous CRC, or familial adenomatous polyposis. The prognostic factors were examined retrospectively using data on pre-hepatectomy factors, including primary tumor molecular profiling results.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 101 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for CRLOM. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS G12D mutation-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.69; p < 0.01), RYR2 mutation-positivity (HR: 4.03; p < 0.01), and KRAS G12S mutation-positivity (HR: 3.96; p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml before hepatectomy (HR: 3.62; p < 0.01), and primary tumor pN2 stage (HR: 3.22; p = 0.03) were significant predictors of the URFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that specific KRAS and RYR2 mutations were associated with the URFS.

Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.

Evaluation of the simultaneous effects of KRAS G12V and LCS6 alterations on the behavior of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are the seventh most common cancer accounting for 90 % of malignant neoplasia of the upper respiratory system. KRAS is a very important oncogene, leading to the suppression of apoptosis, and promoting the pathogenesis and development of tumors. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are highly conserved, small noncoding RNA molecules aberrantly expressed in various pathologies including regulation of tumor and metastasis-associated genes. Variant (rs61764370) of the let-7 miRNA complementary site of KRAS 3'-untranslated region (KRAS-LCS6) has been shown to disrupt the ability of miRNAs to target genes resulting in differential target mRNA and protein expression.

METHODS

In this study, the effects of variant complementary site LCS6 of the let-7 miRNA in head and neck cancer were investigated in vitro using laryngeal carcinoma HEp-2 carrying G12V and LCS6 alterations in the KRAS gene. Non-cancer HEK-293 cells were also used as control cells.

RESULTS

G12V mutation in the KRAS gene increases invasion capacity and is specifically active on the ERK pathway associated with metastasis. Alteration in the LCS6 region of the KRAS gene did not show additional effects compared to cells only carrying G12V mutation. Our results also showed that the coexistence of G12V and LCS6 alterations is lethal to specific cell types, UM-SCC-17A laryngeal cancer cells in our case.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCS6 region alteration of the KRAS may play a key role in further cancer progression, and more research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms by which the LCS6 alterations promote cancer progression.

KRAS Variants Are Associated With Survival Outcomes and Genomic Alterations in Biliary Tract Cancers

PURPOSE

KRAS variants are associated with poor outcomes in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). This study assesses the prevalence of KRAS variants and their association with survival and recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, single-institution study at Memorial Sloan Kettering, tumors from 985 patients treated between 2004 and 2022 with IHC, EHC, and GB who underwent either curative-intent resection or were treated with chemotherapy for unresectable disease were used for targeted sequencing.

RESULTS

Of the 985 patients sequenced, 15% had a KRAS mutation. Five hundred and seventy-two had unresectable disease (n = 395 IHC, n = 71 EHC, n = 106 GB) and 413 were treated with curative-intent resection (n = 175 IHC, n = 119 EHC, and n = 119 GB). Median follow-up time was 18 months (IQR, 11-31). KRAS G12D mutations were most common in IHC (38%) and EHC (37%) tumors. Mutations in SF3B1 co-occurred with mutant KRAS in IHC and EHC, with comutant resectable patients having worse survival after adjusting for tumor type (hazard ratio [HR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.45 to 11.2]; P = .007). KRAS G12 mutations were associated with worse survival in patients with IHC compared with wild-type (WT) or other KRAS mutations, regardless of resection status (unresectable P < .001, resectable P = .011). After adjusting for clinical covariates, KRAS G12 mutations remained a prognostic indicator for patients with IHC compared with WT (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.80]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The adverse impact of KRAS mutations in BTC is driven by G12 alterations in patients with IHC regardless of resection status, which was not observed in GB or EHC. There are unique comutational partners in distinct BTC subsets. These differences have important clinical implications in the era of KRAS-targeted therapeutics.

Patterns of recurrence after curative intent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Improved surgical techniques and more intensive systemic therapy have increased the number of patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer eligible for resection, but a significant percentage of these cases will ultimately recur. Furthermore, distinct recurrence patterns have been associated with different outcomes.

METHODS

Data for 195 patients who underwent curative-intent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection between 2016 and 2022 at Johns Hopkins Hospital were retrospectively collected. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses identified features associated with survival outcomes. Association between risk factors and site of recurrences was conducted via logistic regression with initial recurrences grouped into intrahepatic-only, extrahepatic-only, and concurrent intra- and extrahepatic recurrence.

RESULTS

The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 46% and 22%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 95% and 88%, respectively. The median OS was 71.7 months. Multivariate analysis identified age <60 years, N2 nodal status, R1 liver margin, and higher preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen as top prognostic factors for worse RFS. Additionally, patients with left-sided primary tumors had a higher risk of intrahepatic-only recurrence, whereas mutant KRAS was associated with a higher risk of extrahepatic recurrence with or without liver recurrence.

CONCLUSION

These results from a recent cohort of patients treated with current standard-of-care therapies identify features associated with elevated risk and specific patterns of recurrence. These insights into CRLM recurrence patterns support a larger prospective study to identify subgroups of patients who may require additional therapies to prevent recurrence.

Molecular profiling of risk factors for relapse in Japanese patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The association between the molecular profiles and prognosis of Stage II colorectal cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the risk factors for relapse of Stage II colorectal cancer using molecular profiling.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with pStage II colorectal cancer who did not receive perioperative adjuvant therapy and whose surgically resected specimens were evaluated using gene expression and whole-exome analyses between January 2014 and December 2018. We evaluated the long-term outcomes and examined the risk factors for relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

We evaluated 322 patients with pStage II colorectal cancer, including 126 (39.1%) with right colon cancer. Eighty-seven patients (27.0%) had pT4 tumor, 175 (54.3%) had positive venous invasion, 120 (37.3%) had positive lymphatic invasion, and 68 (21.1%) had perineural invasion. The presence of mutations in key genes for colorectal cancer development based on whole-exome analyses was as follows: APC, 245 (76.1%); TP53, 208 (64.6%); and KRAS, 134 (41.6%). According to the consensus molecular subtype classification based on gene expression, 76 patients (23.6%) had consensus molecular subtype 4 and a significantly lower relapse-free survival than the other patients (5-year relapse-free survival: 83.8% vs. 92.9%, p = 0.017). Perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 5.316, p < 0.001) and consensus molecular subtype 4 (hazard ratio: 2.399, p = 0.020) were identified as independent risk factors for relapse-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular profiling of Stage II colorectal cancer to assess the risk factors for relapse may contribute to the indication and drug selection for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comprehensive structure-function analysis reveals gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms impacting oncogenic KRAS activity

To dissect variant-function relationships in the KRAS oncoprotein, we performed deep mutational scanning (DMS) screens for both wild-type and KRASG12D mutant alleles. We defined the spectrum of oncogenic potential for nearly all possible KRAS variants, identifying several novel transforming alleles and elucidating a model to describe the frequency of KRAS mutations in human cancer as a function of transforming potential, mutational probability, and tissue-specific mutational signatures. Biochemical and structural analyses of variants identified in a KRASG12D second-site suppressor DMS screen revealed that attenuation of oncogenic KRAS can be mediated by protein instability and conformational rigidity, resulting in reduced binding affinity to effector proteins, such as RAF and PI3-kinases, or reduced SOS-mediated nucleotide exchange activity. These studies define the landscape of single amino acid alterations that modulate the function of KRAS, providing a resource for the clinical interpretation of KRAS variants and elucidating mechanisms of oncogenic KRAS inactivation for therapeutic exploitation.

Proteogenomic Characterization of Early Intrahepatic Recurrence after Curative-Intent Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Clinical and pathological factors are insufficient to accurately identify patients at risk of early recurrence after curative-intent treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to identify candidate prognostic proteogenomic biomarkers for early intrahepatic recurrence after curative-intent resection of CRLM. Patients diagnosed with intrahepatic recurrence within 6 months of liver resection were categorized as the "early recurrence" group, while those who achieved a recurrence-free status for 10 years were designated as "durable remission". Comprehensive genomic and proteomic profiling of fresh frozen samples from these prognostically distinct groups was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay and label-free data-dependent acquisition liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Genetic alterations were identified in 117 of the 523 profiled genes in patients with early recurrence. The most common somatic mutations linked to early recurrence were TP53 (88%), APC (71%), KRAS (38%), and SMAD4 (21%). SMAD4 alterations were absent in samples from patients with a durable remission. Calponin-2, versican core protein, glutathione peroxidase 3, fibulin-5, and amyloid-β precursor protein were upregulated more than 2-fold in early recurrence. Exploratory analysis of these proteogenomic biomarkers suggests that SMAD4, calponin-2, and glutathione peroxidase 3 may have the potential to predict early recurrence, enabling improved prognostication and precision oncology in CRLM.

Association of various RAS codon mutations and prognostic outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy

PURPOSE

The prognostic and predictive value of RAS mutations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have undergone hepatectomy holds substantial importance. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of different RAS codon mutations on long-term survival in CRLM patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinicopathological data from 399 CRLM patients with RAS mutations who underwent hepatectomy between January 2000 and December 2020. The RAS mutation gene status was assessed in KRAS codons (G12, G13, Q61, and A146) and NRAS codons (G12, G13, and Q61). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier plotter and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, patients with KRAS G12 mutations exhibited the most favorable prognosis (p = 0.018). Comparatively, patients harboring KRAS Q61 mutations experienced poorer overall survival (OS) with a median of 15 months versus 33 months (p = 0.011) when compared to those with KRAS G12 mutations. Moreover, patients with NRAS Q61 mutations also showed decreased OS with a median of 26 months versus 33 months (p = 0.020) in comparison to KRAS G12 mutation patients. The results of multivariate analysis showed that both KRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.130; 95% CI 1.088-4.168; p = 0.027) and NRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.877; 95% CI 1.398-5.922; p = 0.004) were independent influencing factors of OS. Based on all identified risk factors, patients with RAS mutation were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. Notably, in the high-risk group, the incorporation of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer OS, while it did not improve the survival of patients in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS Q61 and NRAS Q61 mutations are promising predictors for OS in CRLM patients after hepatectomy. Postoperative chemotherapy may significantly benefit CRLM patients with RAS mutations, particularly those identified as high-risk.

RAS mutation associated with short surgically controllable period in colorectal liver metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic implications of the RAS status in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remain unclear. This study investigated the prognostic significance of RAS status after curative hepatectomy, focusing on surgical controllability.

METHODS

This retrospective study included liver-only CRLM patients who underwent the first hepatectomy between 2015 and 2022 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), surgically controllable period (SCP), and overall survival (OS) were compared between RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) and mutant (RAS-mt) patients. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors for each outcome and independent risk factors for less than 1 year SCP.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were evaluated, comprising 63 patients with RAS-mt status. There was no significant difference in RFS between RAS-mt and RAS-wt (7.00 vs. 8.03 months, p = 0.48). RAS-mt patients exhibited worse SCP (11.80 vs.21.13 months, p < 0.001) and OS (44.03 vs. 70.03 months, p < 0.001) compared to RAS-wt. Multivariate analysis identified RAS-mt as an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.37, p < 0.001) and SCP (HR: 2.20, p < 0.001), and as an independent risk factor for less than 1 year of SCP (odds ratio, 2.31; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

CRLM with RAS mutations should be considered for strict surgical indications with preoperative chemotherapy and thorough examination, considering the possibility of short SCP.

KRAS Mutation Subtypes and Their Association with Other Driver Mutations in Oncogenic Pathways

The KRAS mutation stands out as one of the most influential oncogenic mutations, which directly regulates the hallmark features of cancer and interacts with other cancer-causing driver mutations. However, there remains a lack of precise information on their cooccurrence with mutated variants of KRAS and any correlations between KRAS and other driver mutations. To enquire about this issue, we delved into cBioPortal, TCGA, UALCAN, and Uniport studies. We aimed to unravel the complexity of KRAS and its relationships with other driver mutations. We noticed that G12D and G12V are the prevalent mutated variants of KRAS and coexist with the TP53 mutation in PAAD and CRAD, while G12C and G12V coexist with LUAD. We also noticed similar observations in the case of PIK3CA and APC mutations in CRAD. At the transcript level, a positive correlation exists between KRAS and PIK3CA and between APC and KRAS in CRAD. The existence of the co-mutation of KRAS and other driver mutations could influence the signaling pathway in the neoplastic transformation. Moreover, it has immense prognostic and predictive implications, which could help in better therapeutic management to treat cancer.

Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases

The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.

The relationship of KRAS expression with KRAS status, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrated T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer

Background

The significance of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established; yet, its association with KRAS expression and prognosis warrants further investigation. While high KRAS expression is commonly linked with poorer prognosis in other cancers, its role in CRC remains relatively understudied.

Objective

To explore the correlation between KRAS expression, KRAS status, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating T lymphocyte density in CRC.

Design

Single-center retrospective study.

Methods

Conducted between 2010 and 2020, this study utilized tumor samples to assess KRAS expression and quantify CD3+/CD8+ T lymphocytes. The Cox proportional hazards model and linear regression analysis were employed to examine the relationship between KRAS expression, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes.

Results

This study included 265 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery. No significant association was observed between KRAS expression and KRAS status (p > 0.05). High KRAS expression was associated with poorer overall survival and disease-free survival (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that high KRAS expression remained indicative of a worse prognosis in the group with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and KRAS mutant type (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed KRAS expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor (p < 0.05). However, the significance of KRAS expression was lost in the dMMR and KRAS mutant-type group regarding overall survival (p > 0.05). Notably, KRAS expression showed a negative correlation with the density of CD8+ T lymphocytes in tumor tissue (p < 0.05), a finding also observed in the dMMR group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

No association was found between KRAS expression and KRAS mutation status in CRC. Higher KRAS expression was indicative of poorer prognosis for CRC patients, except for those with proficient mismatch repair and KRAS wild type. In addition, in patients with dMMR, KRAS expression was associated with a lower density of CD8+ T lymphocytes in tumor tissue.

Somatic Mutations in Surgically Treated Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Overview

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States, and up to half of patients develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Notably, somatic genetic mutations, such as mutations in RAS, BRAF, mismatch repair (MMR) genes, TP53, and SMAD4, have been shown to play a prognostic role in patients with CRLM. This review summarizes and appraises the current literature regarding the most relevant somatic mutations in surgically treated CRLM by not only reviewing representative studies, but also providing recommendations for areas of future research. In addition, advancements in genetic testing and an increasing emphasis on precision medicine have led to a more nuanced understanding of these mutations; thus, more granular data for each mutation are reviewed when available. Importantly, such knowledge can pave the way for precision medicine with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence on KRAS mutational profiles in colorectal cancer (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aims to determine the prevalence of specific KRAS mutations and their prognostic value in a homogeneous cohort of patients with isolated CRC PM treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 13 Italian centers, gathered in a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. KRAS mutation subtypes have been correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics and survival [overall survival (OS), local (peritoneal) disease-free survival (LDFS) and disease-free survival (DFS)].

RESULTS

KRAS mutations occurred in 172 patients (47.5%) out of the 362 analyzed. Two different prognostic groups of KRAS mutation subtypes were identified: KRASMUT1 (G12R, G13A, G13C, G13V, Q61H, K117N, A146V), median OS > 120 months and KRASMUT2 (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12S, G12V, G13D, A59E, A59V, A146T), OS: 31.2 months. KRASMUT2 mutations mainly occurred in the P-loop region (P < 0.001) with decreased guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis activity (P < 0.001) and were more frequently related to size (P < 0.001) and polarity change (P < 0.001) of the substituted amino acid (AA). When KRASMUT1 and KRASMUT2 were combined with other known prognostic factors (peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction score, grading, signet ring cell, N status) in multivariate analysis, KRASMUT1 showed a similar survival rate to KRASWT patients, whereas KRASMUT2 was independently associated with poorer prognosis (hazard ratios: OS 2.1, P < 0.001; DFS 1.9, P < 0.001; LDFS 2.5, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRC PM, different KRAS mutation subgroups can be determined according to specific codon substitution, with some mutations (KRASMUT1) that could have a similar prognosis to wild-type patients. These findings should be further investigated in larger series.

Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.

Reclassification of RAS/BRAF allele mutations predicts the survival benefit of triplet chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Different RAS/BRAF allele mutations imply distinct biological properties in various solid tumors. Recently, several studies have focused on the predictive and prognostic roles of various RAS/BRAF allele mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) but the results remain controversial.

Methods

Between March 2017 and September 2022, the patients diagnosed as stages I-IV CRC with detailed medical records including next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and clinicopathological follow-up information available at our center were enrolled. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was tested in a log-rank test. Multivariate tests were carried out using Cox models.

Results

A total of 1029 CRC patients were included, and the incidence of RAS/BRAF mutation was 58.4%. The hypermutated cohort was defined as patients with microsatellite instability-H or POLE/D mutation. In the non-hypermutational cohort, only KRAS G13D mutation was associated with a higher incidence and inferior disease-free survival in patients with stage I-III CRC. In the cohort of patients with non-hypermutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), we assessed the risk of various RAS/BRAF allele mutations and subsequently reclassified patients into four groups based on first-line median progression-free survival: wild type (group 1), low-risk RAS/BRAF mutation (group 2, RAS/BRAF mutations other than KRAS G13D/G12V/G12C or BRAF V600E), high-risk RAS mutation (group 3, KRAS G13D/G12V/G12C), and BRAF V600E mutation (group 4). mCRC patients with high-risk RAS mutation could significantly benefit from intensive triplet chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-5.12; p = 0.0091).

Conclusion

In the non-hypermutated CRC cohort, the prognostic risk of various RAS/BRAF allele mutations varied between local and metastatic CRC. KRAS G13D mutation tended to be the only prognostic marker for stages I-III CRC; however, KRAS G13D/G12V/G12C mutations collectively defined a high-risk subgroup of mCRC patients with poor prognosis, who would benefit from intensive triplet chemotherapy.

Effects of KRAS Genetic Interactions on Outcomes in Cancers of the Lung, Pancreas, and Colorectum

BACKGROUND

KRAS is among the most commonly mutated oncogenes in cancer, and previous studies have shown associations with survival in many cancer contexts. Evidence from both clinical observations and mouse experiments further suggests that these associations are allele- and tissue-specific. These findings motivate using clinical data to understand gene interactions and clinical covariates within different alleles and tissues.

METHODS

We analyze genomic and clinical data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative for samples from lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. For each of these cancer types, we report epidemiological associations for different KRAS alleles, apply principal component analysis (PCA) to discover groups of genes co-mutated with KRAS, and identify distinct clusters of patient profiles with implications for survival.

RESULTS

KRAS mutations were associated with inferior survival in lung, colon, and pancreas, although the specific mutations implicated varied by disease. Tissue- and allele-specific associations with smoking, sex, age, and race were found. Tissue-specific genetic interactions with KRAS were identified by PCA, which were clustered to produce five, four, and two patient profiles in lung, colon, and pancreas. Membership in these profiles was associated with survival in all three cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutations have tissue- and allele-specific associations with inferior survival, clinical covariates, and genetic interactions.

IMPACT

Our results provide greater insight into the tissue- and allele-specific associations with KRAS mutations and identify clusters of patients that are associated with survival and clinical attributes from combinations of genetic interactions with KRAS mutations.

Follow up after surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence post hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) occurs in 70 % of patients within two years. No established guidance on the method or intensity of follow-up currently exists. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise literature and determine whether it is possible to identify an optimal follow up regime. To this date there are no randomised prospective studies investigating this.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes included general demographics, method, frequency and duration of follow up, survival and recurrence data. Quality assessment of the papers was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles published between 1994 and 2022 were included, including 9945 patients. CT was the most common imaging modality (n = 14) and CEA most common blood test (n = 11). Intensity of follow up was higher in the first two years post resection and only two papers continued follow up post 5 years resection. There was wide variation in outcome measures - Overall survival (OS) was most commonly reported. Nine papers reported OS ranging between 39 and 78.1 %.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in follow up methods and outcome reporting. There is no strong evidence to support intensive follow up, and the benefits of long term follow up are also unknown due to the lack of patient centred data. High quality, prospective studies should be the focus of future research as further retrospective data is unlikely to resolve uncertainties around optimal follow up.

Does RAS Status Increase the Prevalence of Positive Resection Margin in Colorectal Liver Metastasis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal liver metastasis has a high incidence, and RAS oncogene mutation status carries significant prognostic information. We aimed to assess whether RAS-mutated patients present more or less frequently with positive margins in their hepatic metastasectomy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. We analyzed liver metastatic colorectal cancer studies, which included information on RAS status and had surgical margin analysis of the liver metastasis. Odds ratios were computed using a random-effect model due to anticipated heterogeneity. We further performed a subanalysis limited to studies that included only patients with KRAS instead of all-RAS mutations.

RESULTS

From the 2,705 studies screened, 19 articles were included in the meta-analysis. There were 7,391 patients. The prevalence of positive resection margin was not significantly different between patients carrier vs non-carrier for the all-RAS mutations (OR .99; 95% CI 0.83-1.18; P = .87), and for only KRAS mutation (OR .93; 95% CI 0.73-1.19; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strong correlation between colorectal liver metastasis prognosis and RAS mutation status, our meta-analysis's results suggest no correlation between the RAS status and the prevalence of positive resection margins. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the RAS mutation's role in the surgical resections of colorectal liver metastasis.

Impact of Molecular Status on Metastasectomy of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Although surgical resection could provide better survival for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), the recurrence rate after resection of CRLM remains high. The progress of genome sequencing technologies has greatly improved the molecular understanding of colorectal cancer. In the era of genomics and targeted therapy, genetic mutation analysis is of great significance to guide systemic treatment and identify patients who can benefit from resection of CRLM. RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability/deficient deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair status have been incorporated into current clinical practice. Other promising molecular biomarkers such as coexisting gene mutations and circulating tumor DNA are under active investigation. This study aimed to review the prognostic significance of molecular biomarkers in patients with CRLM undergoing metastasectomy based on the current evidence.

The Genomic Landscape of Colorectal Cancer in the Saudi Arabian Population Using a Comprehensive Genomic Panel

PURPOSE

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology detects specific mutations that can provide treatment opportunities for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the mutation frequencies of common actionable genes and their association with clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes using targeted NGS in 107 Saudi Arabian patients without a family history of CRC.

RESULTS

Approximately 98% of patients had genetic alterations. Frequent mutations were observed in BRCA2 (79%), CHEK1 (78%), ATM (76%), PMS2 (76%), ATR (74%), and MYCL (73%). The APC gene was not included in the panel. Statistical analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed an unusual positive association between poorly differentiated tumors and survival rates (p = 0.025). Although no significant univariate associations between specific mutations or overall mutation rate and overall survival were found, our preliminary analysis of the molecular markers for CRC in a predominantly Arab population can provide insights into the molecular pathways that play a significant role in the underlying disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may help optimize personalized therapy when drugs specific to a patient's mutation profile have already been developed.

Different oncological features of colorectal cancer codon-specific KRAS mutations: Not codon 13 but codon 12 have prognostic value

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are linked to Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. KRAS mutations are associated with poor CRC prognosis, especially KRAS codon 12 mutation, which is associated with metastasis and poorer survival. However, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of KRAS codon 13 mutation in CRC remain unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of codon-specific KRAS mutations, especially in codon 13.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III CRC between January 2009 and December 2019. Patients with KRAS mutation status confirmed by molecular pathology reports were included. The relationships between clinicopathological characteristics and individual codon-specific KRAS mutations were analyzed. Survival data were analyzed to identify codon-specific KRAS mutations as recurrence-related factors using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 2203 patients, the incidence of KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 mutations was 27.7%, 9.1%, and 1.3%, respectively. Both KARS codons 12 and 13 mutations showed a tendency to be associated with clinical characteristics, but only codon 12 was associated with pathological features, such as stage of primary tumor (T stage), lymph node involvement (N stage), vascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, and microsatellite instability. KRAS codon 13 mutation showed no associations (77.2% vs 85.3%, P = 0.159), whereas codon 12 was associated with a lower 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (78.9% vs 75.5%, P = 0.025). In multivariable analysis, along with T and N stages and vascular and perineural invasion, only codon 12 (hazard ratio: 1.399; 95% confidence interval: 1.034-1.894; P = 0.030) among KRAS mutations was an independent risk factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that KRAS codon 13 mutation is less likely to serve as a prognostic biomarker than codon 12 mutation for CRC in a large-scale cohort.

RAS-targeted cancer therapy: Advances in drugging specific mutations

Rat sarcoma (RAS), as a frequently mutated oncogene, has been studied as an attractive target for treating RAS-driven cancers for over four decades. However, it is until the recent success of kirsten-RAS (KRAS)G12C inhibitor that RAS gets rid of the title "undruggable". It is worth noting that the therapeutic effect of KRASG12C inhibitors on different RAS allelic mutations or even different cancers with KRASG12C varies significantly. Thus, deep understanding of the characteristics of each allelic RAS mutation will be a prerequisite for developing new RAS inhibitors. In this review, the structural and biochemical features of different RAS mutations are summarized and compared. Besides, the pathological characteristics and treatment responses of different cancers carrying RAS mutations are listed based on clinical reports. In addition, the development of RAS inhibitors, either direct or indirect, that target the downstream components in RAS pathway is summarized as well. Hopefully, this review will broaden our knowledge on RAS-targeting strategies and trigger more intensive studies on exploiting new RAS allele-specific inhibitors.

Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention remains the cornerstone of a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Nevertheless, patient outcomes vary greatly. While predictive tools can assist decision-making and patient counseling, decades of efforts have yet to result in generating a universally adopted tool in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical therapy between 2000 and 2018 was used to select 1,004 operations for this study. Two different machine learning methods were applied to construct 2 predictive models for recurrence and death, using 128 clinicopathologic variables: gradient-boosted trees (GBTs) and logistic regression with bootstrapping (LRB) in a leave-one-out cross-validation.

RESULTS

Median survival after resection was 47.2 months, and disease-free survival was 19.0 months, with a median follow-up of 32.0 months in the cohort. Both models had good predictive power, with GBT demonstrating a superior performance in predicting overall survival (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] 0.773, 95% CI 0.743 to 0.801 vs LRB: AUC 0.648, 95% CI 0.614 to 0.682) and recurrence (AUC 0.635, 95% CI 0.599 to 0.669 vs LRB: AUC 0.570, 95% CI 0.535 to 0.601). Similarly, better performances were observed predicting 3- and 5-year survival, as well as 3- and 5-year recurrence, with GBT methods generating higher AUCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning provides powerful tools to create predictive models of survival and recurrence after surgery for CLM. The effectiveness of both machine learning models varies, but on most occasions, GBT outperforms LRB. Prospective validation of these models lays the groundwork to adopt them in clinical practice.

Precision Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Current Era: A Systematic Review

Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is widely considered the treatment with the highest curative potential. However, not all patients derive the same oncological benefit, underlining the need for better patient stratification and treatment allocation. In this context, we performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the role of RAS status in selecting the optimal surgical strategy. Evidence comparing anatomical with non-anatomical resections depending on RAS mutational status was scarce and conflicting, with two studies reporting superiority in mutated RAS (mutRAS) patients and two studies reporting equivalent outcomes. The rate of incomplete microscopic resection (R1) was found to be increased among mutRAS patients, possibly due to higher micrometastatic spread lateral to the primary lesion. The impact of R1 resection margins was evaluated separately for mutRAS and wild-type patients in three studies, of which, two indicated an additive detriment to long-term survival in the former group. In the current era of precision surgery, RAS status can be utilized to predict the efficacy of liver resection in the treatment of CRLM, avoiding a potentially morbid operation in patients with adverse tumor profiles.

Genomic Predictors of Recurrence Patterns After Complete Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Adjuvant Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Despite curative hepatectomy, most colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients relapse locally within 2 years. Genomic predictors for hepatic recurrence are poorly understood. This study was designed to identify genomic signatures for recurrence in resected CRLM patients treated with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and/or systemic (SYS) chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative hepatectomy and adjuvant HAI+SYS or SYS between January 2000 and October 2017 with next-generation sequencing data were catalogued. Gene and signaling-level alterations were checked for association with time to any (AR), liver (LR), and extrahepatic recurrence (ER) by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of 172 receiving HAI+SYS, 100 patients recurred, with 69 LR and 83 ER. Five- and ten-year LR-free rates were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-65%) and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively. Five- and 10-year ER-free, rates were 51% (95% CI 43-58%) and 45% (95% CI 36-54%), respectively. More ER was observed with tumors harboring altered KRAS (38% [95% CI 25-50%] vs. 63% [95% CI 53-71%], p-adj = 0.003) and RAS/RAF (36% [95% CI 25-48%] vs. 66% [95% CI 56-74%], p-adj < 0.001) than wild-type. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with worse AR (26% [95% CI 14-40%] vs. 48% [95% CI 39-57%], p-unadj < 0.001), ER (30% [95% CI 17-45%] vs. 62% [95% CI 53-70%], p-unadj < 0.001), and LR rate (40% [95% CI 24-57%] vs. 70% [95% CI 60-77%], p-unadj = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, controlling for clinical risk score, ablation, margin status, and primary T-stage, co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with increased risk for AR (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31, p-unadj < 0.001), LR (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, p-unadj = 0.029), and ER (HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.78-4.44, p-unadj < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Altered KRAS, RAS/RAF, and RAS/RAF-TP53 associated with earlier local and distant recurrence in resected CRLM patients receiving adjuvant HAI+SYS. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was a novel predictor of LR warranting investigation of whether genomic cooperativity is associated with this relapsing phenotype. Systemic therapies tailored to high-risk tumor biology are needed to reduce distant relapse after hepatectomy.

In Silico Strategies for Designing of Peptide Inhibitors of Oncogenic K-Ras G12V Mutant: Inhibiting Cancer Growth and Proliferation

Ras plays a pivotal function in cell proliferation and is an important protein in signal transduction pathways. Mutations in genes encoding the Ras protein drive the signaling cascades essential for malignant transformation, tumour angiogenesis, and metastasis and are responsible for above 30% of all human cancers. There is evidence that N-Ras, K-Ras, and H-Ras play significant roles in human cancer. The mutated K-Ras protein is typically observed in malignant growths. Mutant K-Ras is the most common in lung, colon, and pancreatic cancers. The purpose of this research was to create peptides that inhibit K-Ras G12V. The crystal structure of the mutant K-Ras G12V-H-REV107 complex was obtained from a protein data bank. Further, we used a residue scan approach to create unique peptides from the reference peptide (H-REV107). AMBER molecular dynamics simulations were used to test the stability of the top four proposed peptides (based on binding free energies). Our findings showed that the top four selected peptides had stronger interactions with K-Ras than the reference peptide and have the ability to block the activation function of K-Ras. Our extensive analyses of binding affinities showed that our designed peptide possesses the potential to inhibit K-Ras and to reduce the progression of cancer.

Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases: Current knowledge and future perspectives

Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) includes optimal selection of both the patient and surgery. Initial attempts of using clinical risk scores to identify patients for whom technically feasible surgery is oncologically futile failed. Since then, patient selection for single-stage hepatectomy followed three distinct approaches, all of which incorporated biomarkers. The BRAF V600E mutation, the G12V KRAS variant, and the triple mutation of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 appear to be the most promising, but none can be used in isolation to deny surgery in otherwise resectable cases. Combining biomarkers with clinicopathologic factors that predict poor prognosis may be used to select patients for surgery, but external validation and matched analyses with medically treated counterparts are needed. Patient selection for special surgical procedures (two-stage hepatectomy [TSH], Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for staged hepatectomy [ALPPS], and liver transplant [LT]) has been recently refined. Specifically, BRAF mutations and right-sided laterality have been proposed as separate contraindications to LT. A similar association of right-sided laterality, particularly when combined with RAS mutations, with very poor outcomes has been observed for ALPPS and has been suggested as a biologic contraindication. Data are scarce for TSH but RAS mutations may portend very poor survival following TSH completion. The selection of the best single-stage hepatectomy (optimal margin and type of resection) based on biomarkers remains debated, although there is some evidence that RAS may play a significant role. Lastly, although there are currently no criteria to select among the three special techniques based on their efficacy or appropriateness in different settings, RAS mutational status may be used to select patients for TSH, while right-sided tumor in conjunction with a RAS mutation may be a contraindication to LT and ALPPS.

Association of Simultaneous vs Delayed Resection of Liver Metastasis With Complications and Survival Among Adults With Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Simultaneous or delayed resection of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a controversial topic.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of simultaneous vs delayed resection in patients with resectable SLM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This comparative effectiveness research study included 1569 patients with resectable SLM who underwent curative-intent liver resection at 3 independent centers in China between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and the data were analyzed from April 1 to 30, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with at least 1 major complication within 60 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates.

RESULTS

Among the 1569 patients included, 1057 (67.4%) underwent delayed resection (719 men [68.0%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.4 [11.2] years), and 512 patients (310 men [60.5%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.1 [10.5] years) underwent simultaneous resection. Matching yielded 495 pairs of patients underwent simultaneous resection. The percentage of major perioperative complications did not differ between the simultaneous and delayed resection groups (34.1% vs 30.0%; P = .89). The OS rates were 65.2% at 3 years, 47.1% at 5 years, and 38.0% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 78.0% at 3 years, 65.4% at 5 years, and 63.1% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85, P = .003). The CSS rates were 68.3% at 3 years, 48.5% at 5 years, and 37.1% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 79.2% at 3 years, 67.2% at 5 years, and 65.9% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.98; P = .004). On subgroup analysis comparing the 2 strategies according to the KRAS sequence variation status, the OS rates (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; P < .001) and CSS rates (HR, 1.62; 95 CI, 1.40-1.87; P = .003]) in the simultaneous resection group were significantly better than those in the delayed resection group in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study suggest that complication rates did not differ when CRC and SLM were resected simultaneously and that the survival benefits of simultaneous resection were restricted to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. Integrating molecular features into the treatment decision is a basis for accurate, individualized treatments.

Association of primary tumor laterality with surgical outcomes for colorectal liver metastases: results from the Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC)

BACKGROUND

Primary laterality of colorectal cancer is thought to be associated with differences in outcomes. Liver metastasis is the most common site of solitary colorectal cancer spread. However, how primary colorectal cancer laterality affects outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis remains unclear.

METHODS

The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC) of operative hepatectomy cases for colorectal liver metastasis was compiled from five participating institutions. This included consecutive cases from 2000 to 2018 at all sites. A total of 884 patients were included in this study. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Patients with left-sided versus right-sided cancers had significantly better overall survival: 49.4 vs. 41.8 months (p < 0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type (43.6 vs 56.1 months; p < 0.001). In left-sided cancers, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type cancers (43.6 vs 56.6 months; p < 0.01). This association was absent in patients with right-sided primary tumors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed different variable sets (non-overlapping) were associated with overall survival, when comparing left-sided and right-sided cancers.

CONCLUSION

Understanding how primary tumor laterality and related biological aspects affect long-term outcomes can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Prognostic Models Incorporating RAS Mutation to Predict Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Narrative Review

Recurrence and survival vary widely among patients who undergo curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Prognostic models provide estimated probabilities of these outcomes and allow the effects of multiple potentially interacting variables to be adjusted and assessed simultaneously. Although many prognostic models based on clinicopathologic factors have been developed since the 1990s to predict survival after resection of CRLM, these models vary in their predictive performance when applied to contemporary cohorts. Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) mutation status is routinely tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor therapy. In addition, mutations in RAS predict survival and recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. Several recent prognostic models have incorporated RAS mutation status as a surrogate of tumor biology and combined revised clinicopathologic variables to improve the prediction of recurrence and survival. This narrative review aims to evaluate the differences between contemporary prognostic models incorporating RAS mutation status and their clinical applicability in patients considered for curative-intent resection of CRLM.

Integrated Analysis of a Ferroptosis-Related LncRNA Signature for Evaluating the Prognosis of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

LncRNAs have been well known for their multiple functions in the tumorigenesis, development, and relapse of colorectal cancer (CRC). Accumulating studies demonstrated that the expression of lncRNAs can be regulated by ferroptosis, a biological process that has been revealed to suppress CRC progression. However, the functions and clinical implications of ferroptosis-associated lncRNAs in CRC remain largely unknown. We, herein, aim to construct a prognostic signature with ferroptosis-related lncRNAs for the prognostic estimation of CRC patients. Firstly, we identified the lncRNAs related to ferroptosis based on the RNA-Seq data of CRC from the TCGA database. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were then performed to establish a prognostic signature composed of eight ferroptosis-related lncRNAs (AL161729.4, AC010973.2, CCDC144NL-AS1, AC009549.1, LINC01857, AP003555.1, AC099850.3, and AC008494.3). Furthermore, we divided the CRC patients into high- and low-risk groups based on the signature and found the overall survival (OS) of patients in the high-risk group was significantly shorter than that in the low-risk group (p = 3.31 × 10-11). Moreover, the patients in the high-risk groups had shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 6.5 × 10-3) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 4.27 × 10-4), as well as higher tumor recurrence rate. Additionally, we found that the oncogenic pathways were enriched in the high-risk group, whereas the ferroptosis pathway that probably repressed CRC development was enriched in the low-risk group. In summary, our signature may provide a theoretical foundation for not only accurate judgment for prognosis but also evaluation for recurrence and metastasis in CRC patients.

Effect of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

KRAS gene mutations can predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

We undertook a meta-analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RECOURSE, TERRA and J003) to investigate the impact of KRAS mutations in codons 12 or 13 on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival in patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) for refractory mCRC.

Results

A total of 1375 patients were included, of whom 478 had a KRAS codon 12 mutation and 130 had a KRAS codon 13 mutation. In univariate analyses, the absence of a KRAS codon 12 mutation was found to significantly increase the OS benefit of FTD/TPI relative to placebo compared with the presence of the mutation {hazard ratio (HR), 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.72] versus 0.86 (0.70-1.05), respectively; interaction P = 0.0206}. Multivariate analyses showed that taking confounding factors into account reduced the difference in treatment effect between the presence and the absence of KRAS codon 12 mutations, confirming that treatment benefit was maintained in patients with [HR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59-0.89)] and without [HR, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74)] codon 12 mutations (interaction P = 0.2939). KRAS mutations in codon 13 did not reduce the OS benefit of FTD/TPI relative to placebo, and, furthermore, KRAS mutations at either codon 12 or codon 13 did not affect the progression-free survival benefit.

Conclusions

Treatment with FTD/TPI produced a survival benefit, relative to placebo, regardless of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutation status in patients with previously treated mCRC.

●

KRAS mutations are associated with negative outcomes in patients with mCRC; codon 12 and 13 mutations are the most common.

●

FTD/TPI was associated with longer median overall survival vs placebo both in patients with wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS.

●

FTD/TPI produced a survival benefit, relative to placebo, regardless of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutation status in this patient group.

The management of colorectal liver metastases amenable of surgical resection: How to shape treatment strategies according to clinical, radiological, pathological and molecular features

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor chances of long term survival, being < 15% of them still alive after 5 years from diagnosis. Nonetheless, patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be eligible for metastases resection thus being able to achieve long-term disease remission and survival. The likelihood for patients with CRLM of being or becoming eligible for liver metastasectomy is increasing, thanks to the evolution of surgical techniques, the availability of active systemic treatments and the widespread diffusion of experienced multidisciplinary boards to manage these patients. However, disease relapse after liver surgery is common and occurs in two-thirds of resected patients. Therefore, adequate radiological staging and risk stratification is crucial for the optimal selection of patients candidate to surgery in order to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of liver metastasectomy and to individualize the treatment strategy. Based on the multidimensional assessment, three possible approaches are available: upfront liver surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy preceding and following liver surgery, and an upfront systemic treatment including chemotherapy plus a targeted agent, both chosen according to patients' and tumours' characteristics, then followed by liver surgery if indicated. In this review, we describe the most important factors impacting the therapeutic choices in patients with resectable and potentially resectable CRLM, and we discuss the most promising factors that may reshape the future decision-making process of these patients.

A novel score system for predicting conversion to no evidence of Disease (C-NED) in initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

An estimated 70-80% of cases of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) are defined as initially unresectable. "Converting" to no evidence of disease (NED) status may prolong survival. The current study aimed to develop a novel scoring system that predicts the conversion outcome for initially unresectable CRLM. A total of 215 consecutive CRLM patients who received first-line systemic therapy from December 2012 to January 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were enrolled in the internal cohort. Forty CRLM patients from the database of the Chinese Colorectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Alliance were enrolled in the external cohort. A logistic regression model was applied to identify risk factors associated with the conversion outcome. The tumor-to-liver volume ratio (TLVR) was calculated as the total tumor volume divided by the total liver volume, and its cutoff value was 0.23. Three predictors of conversion failure were identified in the internal cohort and incorporated into the C-NED score: poor tumor differentiation (1 point), number of liver metastases > 8 (1 point) and TLVR ≥ 0.23 (1 point). The conversion rate was significantly negatively associated with the C-NED score (P < 0.001). The C-indexes of the C-NED score for predicting successful conversion outcome in the internal cohort and external cohort were 0.734 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.668-0.800) and 0.736 (95% CIs, 0.566-0.907), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) time (P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) time (P = 0.003) were statistically significant different among different C-NED score groups. Our study demonstrated that the C-NED score is an effective scoring system that indicates the actual conversion probability for initially unresectable CRLM patients before treatment, which can serve as a tool that guides optimal first-line management strategies.

A transcriptomic signature that predicts cancer recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Cancer recurrence is an important predictor of survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer-associated liver metastasis (CRLM), who undergo radical hepatectomy. Therefore, identification of patients with the greatest risk of recurrence is critical for developing a precision oncology strategy that might include frequent surveillance (in low-risk patients) or a more aggressive treatment approach (in high-risk patients). We performed genome-wide expression profiling, to identify and develop a transcriptomic signature for predicting recurrence in patients with CRLM.

METHODS

We analysed a total of 383 patients with CRLM, including 63 patients from a publicly available data set (the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus with accession number GSE81423). and 320 patients from whom surgical specimens were collected for independent training (n = 169) and validation (n = 151) of identified biomarkers. Using Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis, we evaluated the clinical significance of the identified gene signature by comparing its performance with several key clinical factors.

RESULTS

We identified a six-gene panel that robustly categorised patients with recurrence in the discovery (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90). We showed that the panel was a significant predictor of recurrence in the clinical training (AUC = 0.83) and validation cohorts (AUC = 0.81). By combining our panel with key clinical factors, we established a risk-stratification model that emerged as an independent predictor of recurrence (AUC = 0.85; univariate: hazard ratio (HR) = 4.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.71-6.93, P < 0.001; multivariate: HR = 3.40, 95% CI = 1.76-6.56, P < 0.001). The stratification model revealed recurrence prediction in 89% of high-risk group and non-recurrence in 62% of low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a novel transcriptomic signature that robustly predicts recurrence, which has significant implications for the management of patients with CRLM.

Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances have been made in the multimodal management of this disease. Surgical treatment, combined with a modern chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies, is the only potential curative treatment. Unfortunately, 70% of patients treated for CRLM experience recurrence. RAS mutations are associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival. Other mutations such as BRAF, associated RAS /TP53 and APC/PIK3CA mutations are important genetic markers to evaluate tumor biology. Somatic mutations are of paramount interest for tailoring preoperative treatment, defining a surgical resection strategy and the indication for ablation techniques. Herein, the most relevant studies dealing with RAS mutations and the management of CRLM were reviewed. Controversies about the implication of this mutation in surgical and ablative treatments were also discussed.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology in Colorectal Liver Metastases

Prognostic models allow clinicians to predict survival outcomes, facilitate patient-physician discussions, and identify subgroups with potentially distinct prognoses [...].