Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis

Lower reporting of venous thromboembolisms events with natural estrogen-based combined oral contraceptives compared to ethinylestradiol-containing pills: A disproportionality analysis of the Eudravigilance database

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacovigilance data analysis can accelerate the identification of drug-related safety signals or reassure on the safety profile. This study evaluates the venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk of newer combined oral contraceptive (COC) formulations with natural estrogens, such as estradiol (E2) and estetrol (E4), using data from the EudraVigilance database.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a disproportionality reporting rate analysis of VTE events associated with various COC formulations by extracting individual case reports from EudraVigilance database up to July 28, 2024. The study compared the proportionality reporting rate between natural estrogen-based COCs (E2 and E4) and conventional synthetic estrogen-based COCs (ethinylestradiol [EE]), with a comparison to EE-levonorgestrel.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that COCs containing natural estrogens exhibited significantly lower proportionality reporting rates for thrombotic events compared to EE-based COCs. Specifically, E4-drospirenone (E4-DRSP) showed the lowest proportionality reporting rate (0.12), similar to progestin-only pills. EE-DRSP had the highest proportionality reporting rate (2.25), suggesting an increased thrombotic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the safer thrombotic profile of natural estrogen-based COCs, particularly E2 and E4 formulations, over synthetic estrogen-based COCs containing EE. These findings support the hypothesis that E2- and E4-based pills are safer than EE-based pills, aligning with a shift toward safer contraceptive options in clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS

Natural estrogens such as E2 and E4 may emerge as safer alternatives to synthetic estrogens like EE, particularly when combined with progestins like DRSP. This multilevel evidence underscores the importance of evidence-based prescribing practices to enhance patient safety and minimize thrombotic risks associated with COC use.

Simultaneous central retinal vein and cilioretinal artery occlusion in a young female patient with progestin-only oral contraceptive use: a case report

BACKGROUND

Central retinal vein occlusion and cilioretinal artery occlusion are rare but serious ocular conditions that can lead to significant visual impairment. While few cases of central retinal vein occlusion and cilioretinal artery occlusion have been individually reported, concurrent occlusion of both vessels is extremely rare, particularly in younger patients without traditional vascular risk factors. We present the first reported case of simultaneous central retinal vein occlusion and cilioretinal artery occlusion in a young female patient associated with short-term use of progestin-only oral contraceptives (OCPs).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 28-year-old Pakistani female patient presented with sudden, painless vision loss in the left eye, 3 hours prior to her arrival at the ophthalmology clinic. Visual acuity in the affected eye was limited to counting fingers at a distance of 0.5 feet, with a best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 in the right eye. Fundoscopic examination revealed optic disc edema, preretinal hemorrhages, venous dilation, and cotton wool spots consistent with central retinal vein occlusion, alongside ischemic changes in the foveal region suggestive of cilioretinal artery occlusion. On the basis of clinical examination, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography findings, the patient was diagnosed with concurrent central retinal vein occlusion and cilioretinal artery occlusion. Systemic workup to rule out thrombophilia and other vascular risks was negative. She was treated with acetazolamide, aspirin, and ocular massage, alongside a dorzolamide-timolol combination for intraocular pressure control. Six weeks later, panretinal photocoagulation was performed to prevent neovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the rare presentation of simultaneous central retinal vein occlusion and cilioretinal artery occlusion, likely precipitated by short-term progestin-only OCP use in a young female. The absence of other vascular risk factors emphasizes the potential thrombotic risk associated with hormonal contraception, even in brief courses. Careful consideration should be given to contraceptive choice, and ophthalmologic monitoring is recommended for early detection and intervention in at-risk patients.

Awareness of Varicose Veins Associated With the Use of Contraceptive Pills Among Women in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Varicose veins are a rare side effect of birth control pills, linked to hormonal changes that may weaken vein walls and valves, impair blood flow, and increase venous pressure. Factors like sedentary behavior, prolonged standing or sitting, and genetic predisposition may worsen the risk. Additionally, contraceptive hormones can promote fluid retention and venous stasis, further contributing to vein dilation. The direct link between birth control pills and varicose veins remains unclear, as factors such as BMI, age, and pre-existing conditions also play a role. However, limited research exists, particularly in our region, highlighting the need for awareness and studies to address these potential risks and improve women's health outcomes. Aim The current study aims to assess the women's awareness of varicose veins caused by the contraceptive pill in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. By assessing women's understanding of this topic, the study seeks to uncover any prevalent misunderstandings, such as underestimating the role of hormonal changes or overlooking contributing lifestyle factors. This information will help guide awareness campaigns and educational efforts to ensure accurate and accessible information is provided, addressing the unique health concerns and knowledge gaps within our community. Methods This study uses the convenience sampling method and data was collected using a self-report online questionnaire targeting women in Jazan who have used contraception pills or who have been diagnosed with varicose veins (N=494). This is a cross-sectional survey with a target group of Saudi women aged 18 to 64 years old who live in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited through online platforms, including social media channels commonly accessed by women in the community, and through healthcare facilities where contraceptive counseling is provided. This multi-platform approach aimed to capture a diverse range of participants, although the reliance on convenience sampling may still lead to the underrepresentation of certain groups. Results Seventy-six percent of participants were aware of varicose veins, with a mean score of 1.76 and a standard deviation (SD) of 0.421. This indicates a generally low level of awareness among participants. Sixty-eight percent of participants were aware of the connection between contraceptive pills and the likelihood of developing varicose veins while 31.8% were not. Conclusion The majority of participants were aware of oral contraceptives and side effects. Regarding varicose veins, while most participants recognized the condition, only 38.1% understood its risk factors. Additionally, 64% were uncertain about the link between contraceptive pill use and varicose veins, with just 7.5% fully attributing the condition to contraceptive use. The study also found that older women were more likely to associate contraceptive pills with varicose veins. In light of the findings, this study suggests that healthcare providers enhance health education efforts to raise awareness of the risk factors associated with varicose veins, particularly for women using contraceptive pills. For instance, public campaigns can use social media, community health centers, and educational materials to disseminate information about varicose veins, their risk factors, and the potential influence of contraceptive pills.

Apelin-13 as a novel diagnostic laboratory biomarker in thromboembolic disorders: a review of literature with prospective insights

Thromboembolic disorders, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are major global health concerns, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. Recent research has identified Apelin-13, a bioactive peptide in the apelin family, as a promising diagnostic biomarker for Thromboembolic disorders. Apelin-13 supports vascular health by regulating protease balance through plasminogen activator inhibitors and modulating endothelial cell function. Additionally, it plays a vital role in coagulation, with elevated levels associated with an increased risk of clot formation, suggesting its utility in predicting thrombosis risk, particularly in preoperative evaluations. Findings indicate that the Apelin-13 pathway shows significant promise as a biomarker for Thromboembolic disorders, underscoring its potential therapeutic applications and the need for further investigation. This review synthesizes current literature on thromboembolic disorders and associated laboratory biomarkers, with a particular focus on Apelin-13. It examines Apelin-13's role in disease mechanisms, its physiological functions, and its potential as a diagnostic biomarker in thromboembolic conditions.

Screening for Deep Vein Thrombosis Using D-dimer Levels Based on Surgical Patients' Characteristics

Purpose Owing to the shortage of surgeons and the decrease in medical staff in regional medical care, reducing unnecessary tests can limit the burden on the staff. In this study, we aimed to examine the predictors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), such as D-dimer levels in patients who underwent surgery at our hospital, and determine the feasibility of screening in these patients. Knowledge of D-dimer levels can indicate the risk of DVT in patients about to undergo surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 310 of 1,059 surgical cases in which preoperative lower extremity ultrasonography was performed in our department between April 2021 and June 2024. We compared 46 patients with thrombi and 264 patients without thrombi. Results Patients with low body mass indices (<18.5 kg/m2) and high D-dimer levels (> 2 μg/mL) had a significantly higher risk of DVT, whereas patients taking oral antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants had a significantly lower risk of DVT. The area under the curve for D-dimer levels in predicting DVT was 0.779. D-dimer levels of 2 μg/mL had high sensitivity - (1 - specificity). However, there were three false-negative cases, and the highest D-dimer level that resulted in 100% sensitivity was 1.4 μg/mL. Conclusion Predicting DVT using D-dimer levels may be effective, and considering additional testing based on D-dimer levels and patient background may reduce excessive preoperative testing.

Thrombomodulin is a stronger indicator of combined oral contraceptives-induced activated protein C pathway resistance in the thrombin generation test than activated protein C

Background

The mechanism by which combined oral contraceptives (COCs) lead to hypercoagulation is not fully understood, although activated protein C (APC) pathway resistance has been implicated. APC and thrombomodulin (TM) tend to be considered as interchangeable reagents, even though their biological action in coagulation is different. However, it remains unclear which reagent is better suited for the detection of APC pathway resistance. We compared the effectiveness of TM and APC in TG to detect COC-induced APC pathway resistance using thrombin generation (TG).

Methods

TG was measured on ST Genesia in 48 healthy women, of whom 24 used COCs. TG was triggered with STG-ThromboScreen (with and without TM), spiked with a low and high concentration of TM or APC (2 or 15 nM TM, or 1.5 or 5.5 nM APC), aimed to achieve 50% and 90% ETP inhibition, respectively.

Results

TG was higher in women using COCs. TM and APC inhibit TG in all women, although their inhibitory effect is more pronounced in women without COC compared to women with COC. The addition of 2 nM TM causes an ETP reduction of 40% (1,289 vs. 768 nM•min) in women without COC and an ETP reduction of 24% (1,704 vs. 1,287 nM•min) in women with COC. The addition of 1.5 nM APC causes an ETP reduction of 41% (1,289 vs. 759 nM•min) in women without COC and an ETP reduction of 23% (1,704 vs. 1,316 nM•min) in women with COC. The difference in effect between women with and without COC is largest when 15 nM TM, aimed at 90% ETP inhibition, is used. 15 nM TM leads to the smallest overlap in ETP inhibition between women with and without COC (27% overlap), compared to 2 nM TM (41% overlap), and 1.5 nM APC (38% overlap) and 5.5 nM APC (41% overlap).

Conclusion

Although TM and APC are often used interchangeably to assess the sensitivity of the APC system in TG, our findings suggest that TM is a better discriminator to detect COC-use induced APC pathway resistance. In addition, we found that the ETP is a better TG test readout for APC pathway resistance testing than the peak height.

Are natural estrogens used in contraception at lower risk of venous thromboembolism than synthetic ones? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant global health challenge, notably exacerbated by the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Evidence mainly focuses on the type of progestogen used in COCs to establish the increased risk of VTE with less data assessed on the type of estrogen used. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of VTE associated with COCs containing synthetic estrogens like ethinylestradiol (EE) versus natural estrogens like estradiol (E2).

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in December 2023 in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify clinical studies comparing the VTE risk between COCs containing synthetic versus natural estrogens. Studies were selected through rigorous screening, and data extraction followed standardized protocols, with statistical analyses employing a random effects model.

Results

The search yielded five relevant studies, involving over 560,000 women/time, demonstrating a significant 33% reduction in VTE risk among users of natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic estrogen-based COCs (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87). Stratification analyses using adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the main observationnal studies showed a 49% reduced VTE risk of E2-based pills compared to EE in association with levonorgestrel.

Discussion and conclusion

Despite the longstanding use of EE-based COCs, emerging evidence supports a lower thrombotic risk associated with natural estrogens. This meta-analysis substantiates the lower VTE risk associated with natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic alternatives, advocating for a re-evaluation of contraceptive guidelines to prioritize patient safety and reduce thrombotic risks.

A 27-Year-Old Female With JAK2 Mutation: A Case of Budd-Chiari Syndrome Secondary to Prolonged Oral Contraceptive Pill Use

Individuals with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (ET) demonstrate an increased thrombotic risk associated with JAK2 mutations. Physicians must take heed when treating these patients, to mitigate this pro-thrombotic state as much as possible. Failure to do so, or exacerbating the state, can lead to dire consequences. We present the case of a 27-year-old female with a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) and ET, currently taking estrogen-containing oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). She presented to the emergency department with rapid weight gain, jaundice, nausea, and diarrhea and was found to have obstructive jaundice and thrombotic burden that extended into the portal, mesenteric, splenic, and hepatic veins. On the second attempt, a successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure was performed, resulting in improved venous flow. This case underscores the importance of cautious medication use, especially OCPs, in patients with hypercoagulable states due to JAK2 mutations, for example, the V617F mutation in JAK2. It emphasizes the need for vigilant monitoring, individualized management, and a multidisciplinary approach to mitigate thrombotic complications. Increased awareness and continued research are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with MPNs and associated genetic mutations.

The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on the Incidence and Progression of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women: A Systematic Review

This systematic review examines the impact of hormonal contraceptives on the incidence and progression of cardiovascular diseases in women. We analyzed 14 high-quality studies published between 1998 and 2018, including meta-analyses, cohort studies, case-control studies, and systematic reviews. The aim was to synthesize the current understanding of the relationship between various hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular risks, focusing on outcomes such as venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction. The 14 selected studies represent a comprehensive and diverse body of evidence, allowing for a nuanced analysis of the topic. Our findings indicate that combined oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, with the magnitude of risk varying based on estrogen dose, progestogen type, and individual risk factors. The review of these studies highlights the importance of personalized risk assessment in contraceptive counseling and prescribing practices. By synthesizing data from these key studies, we provide a consolidated view of the current state of knowledge regarding hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular health, offering valuable insights for both clinicians and researchers in the field.

Comparing the risk of deep vein thrombosis of two combined oral contraceptives: Norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol

Background

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported as an adverse event for patients receiving combined oral contraceptives. Norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol (NET/EE) and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (DRSP/EE) are two commonly prescribed combined hormonal oral contraceptive agents used in the United States, differing in their progestin component.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the progestin component of a combined oral contraceptive and the risk of DVT in patients taking oral contraceptives for birth control using data derived from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

The risk of DVT was compared between patients that had taken NET/EE with those that had taken the DRSP/EE COC formulation for birth control. In addition, age was assessed as a possible confounder and the outcome severity for those diagnosed with DVT were compared between the two groups. Finally, association rule mining was utilized to identify possible drug-drug interactions that result in elevated DVT risk.

Results

DVT was the fourth most commonly adverse event reported for patients taking DRSP/EE accounting for 8558 cases and the seventeenth most commonly reported adverse event for NET/EE accounting for 298 cases. Age was found to be a significant confounder for users of DRSP/EE with regards to DVT risk across all age groups assessed: 2040 (ROR = 3.69, 95% CI 3.37-4.04) However, there was only a statistically significant elevated risk in patients over 40 years of age taking NET/EE (ROR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.36-2.88). Patients that had taken DRSP/EE and the corticosteroid prednisone simultaneously had an approximately 3-fold increase in DVT risk (ROR = 2.77, 95% CI 2.43-3.15) relative to individuals that had only taken DRSP/EE.

Conclusion

Based on this analysis, there is a higher risk of developing DVT when taking DRSP/EE than when taking NET/EE as hormonal contraception. In addition, a possibly significant drug-drug interaction between different COC formulations and prednisone were identified. This interaction may result in elevated DVT risk due to a synergistic impairment of fibrinolysis and a decrease in plasmin production.

Incidence rate of venous thrombosis in women switching combined oral contraceptives: a cohort study

Background

The incidence rate of venous thrombosis (VT) in women switching combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is unknown.

Objectives

We hypothesize that women switching COCs may have a similar increased incidence rate of VT as women who start COCs. Switching means starting with a new COC, which may biologically approximate starting.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study with data from the Netherlands and Denmark. First, we identified starters who were defined as women who did not use COCs in the 2 years prior to the start of their first COC prescription within the study period. Switchers were a subset of COC starters who redeemed a COC formulation different from their initial COC during follow-up but not longer than 12 months after starting. We estimated incidence rate ratios (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]) of VT with 95% CIs among COC switchers as compared with COC starters using Poisson regression adjusted for age, COC progestogen generation, and preexisting obesity.

Results

In both countries, we found an increased risk of VT among switchers as compared with starters during the first 3 months of the follow-up (aIRR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.56 in the Netherlands and aIRR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.04-2.16 in Denmark).

Conclusion

Switchers, particularly in the first 3 months after switching, may experience a renewed starter effect thereby increasing the risk of VT.

Is the multinational, surveillance PRO-E2 study informative for all countries? The Italian data on VTE and contraceptive effectiveness

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the thromboembolic risk and contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 observed in the PRO-E2 study can be extended to each participating country, as lifestyle, cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing habits may differ geographically. This analysis was performed on the PRO-E2 Italian subpopulation, where smoking habit and women over 35 years were more prevalent compared with the overall study population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from NOMAC-E2 or levonorgestrel-containing COCs (COCLNG) new users were descriptively analysed. Incidence rates of thrombosis (events/10,000 women-years [WY]) and the Pearl Index (pregnancies/100 WY) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,179 NOMAC-E2 and 8,504 COCLNG users were followed up to 2 years (34,869 WY). The NOMAC-E2 cohort included more women over 35 vs. COCLNG (37.7% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.001). A comparable low risk of combined deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was observed in NOMAC-E2 (1.7/10,000 WY; 95% CI: 0.21-6.2) and COCLNG users (6.6/10,000 WY; 95% CI: 2.4-14.4). Similar results were obtained by considering all thromboembolic events (VTE). Unintended pregnancies did not differ between NOMAC-E2 (0.12/100 WY; 95% CI: 0.06-0.21) and COCLNG (0.15/100 WY; 95% CI: 0.08-0.26) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Despite the higher age and tobacco use, findings from the Italian subpopulation were broadly consistent with overall PRO-E2 results, confirming a similar low thromboembolic risk and high contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 and COCLNG.

SHORT CONDENSATION

This subgroup analysis of the PRO-E2 study provides comprehensive epidemiological data on the use of combined oral contraceptives in a large Italian cohort, with a higher prevalence of women over 35 years and smokers. The study confirms the low thromboembolic risk and high contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 pill.

Postpartum contraception: A matter of guidelines

The postpartum period is the perfect time to access family planning services. WHO guidelines contraindicate combined hormonal contraceptives postpartum in breastfeeding patients between 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery (Medical Eligibility Criteria category 3). On the contrary, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines do not contraindicate their use in women who breastfeed from 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum. New combined hormonal contraceptives with natural estrogens have never been studied in this setting. Guidelines agree on the prescription of the progestin-only pill postpartum in non-breastfeeding women (category 1). Differences are found in women who breastfeed. In non-breastfeeding women, an implant is considered safe (category 1) by all guidelines, without any distinction in time. Regarding postpartum breastfeeding women, the guidelines for implants give quite different indications but are still permissive. Intrauterine devices are viable options for postpartum contraception but guidelines give different indications about the timing of insertion. Postplacental intrauterine device placement can reduce the subsequent unintended pregnancy rate, particularly in settings at greatest risk of not having recommended postpartum controls. However, it has yet to be understood whether this approach can really have an advantage in high-income countries. Postpartum contraception is not a 'matter of guidelines': it is the best customization for each woman, as early as possible but at the ideal timing.

Risk factors of multiple pulmonary emboli in an elite Ironman triathlete: a case report

Objective

To present a unique case of pulmonary embolism (PE) in an elite-Ironman triathlete and review athlete-specific risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Case presentation

A 57-year-old male triathlete presented for chiropractic care of midback pain and dyspnea one day before competition. During competition, he was removed and unable to complete the event with dyspnea, chest, and midback pain. Vitals revealed prolonged elevated resting heart rate. He was triaged to the hospital with a high index of suspicion for PE. He was diagnosed with multiple PE in both lungs.

Summary

VTE is not normally considered in athletes. A combination of athlete-specific risk factors may predispose athletes to a higher propensity of VTE. Due to life-threatening consequences, it is important to include a differential diagnosis of VTE in patients presenting with midback pain and dyspnea.

Acute and chronic venous occlusion

This review article provides an overview of acute and chronic venous occlusion, a condition that can cause significant morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated promptly. The article begins with an introduction to the anatomy of the venous system, followed by a discussion of the causes and clinical features of venous occlusion. The diagnostic tools available for the assessment of venous occlusion, including imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, are then discussed, along with their respective advantages and limitations. The article also covers the treatment options for acute and chronic venous occlusion, including anticoagulant therapy and endovascular interventions. This review aims to provide radiologists with an updated understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of acute and chronic venous occlusion.

Impact of Continuous Estroprogestin Treatment on Circulating Microparticle Levels in Deep Endometriosis Patients

There has been increasing interest in the study of new pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis (END), including the coagulation/fibrinolysis system and its link with inflammation and tissue remodeling. It has been suggested that END patients, especially with deep-infiltrating (DE) forms, could present a hypercoagulable state revealing higher levels of proinflammatory and procoagulant markers, such as total circulating microparticles (cMPs) and cMP-TF (tissue factor), released by cells in response to damage, activation, or apoptosis. However, no previous study has assessed the effect of END hormonal treatments on cMP and cMP-TF levels. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these treatments on cMP and cMP-TF levels in DE patients. Three groups were compared: DE patients receiving a continuous combined oral contraceptive regimen (CCOCR) (n = 41), DE patients without CCOCR (n = 45), and a control group (n = 43). cMP and cMP-TF levels were evaluated in platelet-free plasma. A significant decrease in the total cMP levels was found in the DE group with CCOCR versus the group without CCOCR, reflecting a higher chronic inflammatory status in DE patients that decreased with the treatment. cMP-TF levels were higher in DE patients receiving CCOCR versus those not receiving CCOCR, suggesting that treatments containing estrogens play a predominant role in suppressing the inhibitory pathway of TF.

Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception: a Cochrane systematic review

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. Individuals with COVID-19 using hormonal contraception could be at additional risk for thromboembolism, but evidence is sparse.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review on the risk of thromboembolism with hormonal contraception use in women aged 15-51 years with COVID-19. We searched multiple databases through March 2022, including all studies comparing outcomes of patients with COVID-19 using or not using hormonal contraception. We applied standard risk of bias tools to evaluate studies and GRADE methodology to assess certainty of evidence. Our primary outcomes were venous and arterial thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, intubation, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 2119 studies screened, three comparative non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) and two case series met the inclusion criteria. All studies had serious to critical risk of bias and low study quality. Overall, there may be little to no effect of combined hormonal contraception (CHC) use on odds of mortality for COVID-19-positive patients (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.4). The odds of hospitalisation for COVID-19-positive CHC users may be slightly decreased compared with non-users for patients with body mass index <35 kg/m2 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97). Use of any type of hormonal contraception may have little to no effect on hospitalisation rates for COVID-19-positive individuals (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Not enough evidence exists to draw conclusions regarding risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 using hormonal contraception. Evidence suggests there may be little to no or slightly decreased odds of hospitalisation, and little to no effect on odds of mortality for hormonal contraception users versus non-users with COVID-19.

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome. Combined oral contraceptives (COC), which provide both progestin and oestrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and a low oestrogen dose has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of COCs containing drospirenone in women with PMS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trial register, CENTRAL (now containing output from two trials registers and CINAHL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos on 29 June 2022. We checked included studies' reference lists and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared COCs containing drospirenone with placebo or with another COC for treatment of women with PMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were effects on premenstrual symptoms that were prospectively recorded, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included effects on mood, adverse events, and response rate to study medications.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (858 women analysed, most diagnosed with PMDD). The evidence was very low to moderate quality; the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious inconsistency and imprecision. COCs containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (EE) versus placebo COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve overall premenstrual symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.59 to -0.24; 2 RCTs, N = 514; I2 = 64%; low-quality evidence); and functional impairment due to premenstrual symptoms in terms of productivity (mean difference (MD) -0.31, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 47%; low-quality evidence), social activities (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.04; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 53%; low-quality evidence), and relationships (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 45%; low-quality evidence). The effects from COCs containing drospirenone may be small to moderate. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may increase withdrawal from trials due to adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.78; 4 RCT, N = 776; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects from placebo is 3%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 6% and 16%. We are uncertain of the effect of drospirenone plus EE on premenstrual mood symptoms, when measured by validated tools that were not developed to assess premenstrual symptoms. COCs containing drospirenone may lead to more adverse effects in total (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.11; 3 RCT, N = 739; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of having adverse effects from placebo is 28%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 40% and 54%. It probably leads to more breast pain, and may lead to more nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and menstrual disorder. Its effect on nervousness, headache, asthenia, and pain is uncertain. There was no report of any rare but serious adverse effects, such as venous thromboembolism in any of the included studies. COCs containing drospirenone may improve response rate (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.40; 1 RCT, N = 449; I2 not applicable; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the response rate from placebo is 36%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 39% and 58%. We did not identify any studies that compared COCs containing drospirenone with other COCs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve premenstrual symptoms that result in functional impairments in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a significant effect. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may lead to more adverse effects compared to placebo. We do not know whether it works after three cycles, helps women with less severe symptoms, or is better than other combined oral contraceptives that contain a different progestogen.

Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception

BACKGROUND

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to significant mortality and morbidity, including a high incidence of related thrombotic events. There has been concern regarding hormonal contraception use during the COVID-19 pandemic, as this is an independent risk factor for thrombosis, particularly with estrogen-containing formulations. However, higher estrogen levels may be protective against severe COVID-19 disease. Evidence for risks of hormonal contraception use during the COVID-19 pandemic is sparse. We conducted a living systematic review that will be updated as new data emerge on the risk of thromboembolism with hormonal contraception use in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if use of hormonal contraception increases risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism in women with COVID-19. To determine if use of hormonal contraception increases other markers of COVID-19 severity including hospitalization in the intensive care unit, acute respiratory distress syndrome, intubation, and mortality. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach.

SEARCH METHODS

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, Global Health, and Scopus from inception on March 2023, and monitored the literature monthly. We updated the search strategies with new terms and added the database Global Index Medicus in lieu of LILACS.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all published and ongoing studies of patients with COVID-19 comparing outcomes of those on hormonal contraception versus those not on hormonal contraception. This included case series and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted study data and this was checked by a second author. Two authors individually assessed risk of bias for the comparative studies using the ROBINS-I tool and a third helped reconcile differences. For the living systematic review, we will publish updates to our synthesis every six months. In the event that we identify a study with a more rigorous study design than the current included evidence prior to the planned six-month update, we will expedite the synthesis publication.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three comparative NRSIs with 314,704 participants total and two case series describing 13 patients. The three NRSIs had serious to critical risk of bias in several domains and low study quality. Only one NRSI ascertained current use of contraceptives based on patient report; the other two used diagnostic codes within medical records to assess hormonal contraception use, but did not confirm current use nor indication for use. None of the NRSIs included thromboembolism as an outcome. Studies were not similar enough in terms of their outcomes, interventions, and study populations to combine with meta-analyses. We therefore narratively synthesized all included studies. Based on results from one NRSI, there may be little to no effect of combined hormonal contraception use on odds of mortality for COVID-19 positive patients (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.40; 1 study, 18,892 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two NRSIs examined hospitalization rates for hormonal contraception users versus non-users. Based on results from one NRSI, the odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 positive combined hormonal contraception users may be slightly decreased compared with non-users for patients with BMI under 35 kg/m2 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97; 1 study, 295,689 participants; very low-certainty evidence). According to results of the other NRSI assessing use of any type of hormonal contraception, there may be little to no effect on hospitalization rates for COVID-19 positive individuals (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.44; 1 study, 123 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We included two case series because no comparative studies directly assessed thromboembolism as an outcome. In a case series of six pediatric COVID-19 positive patients with pulmonary embolism, one (older than 15 years of age) was using combined hormonal contraception. In a second case series of seven COVID-19 positive patients with cerebral venous thrombosis, one was using oral contraceptives. One comparative study and one case series reported on intubation rates, but the evidence for both is very uncertain. In the comparative study of 123 COVID-19 positive patients (N = 44 using hormonal contraception and N = 79 not using hormonal contraception), no patients in either group required intubation. In the case series of seven individuals with cerebral venous thromboembolism, one oral contraceptive user and one non-user required intubation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no comparative studies assessing risk of thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients who use hormonal contraception, which was the primary objective of this review. Very little evidence exists examining the risk of increased COVID-19 disease severity for combined hormonal contraception users compared to non-users of hormonal contraception, and the evidence that does exist is of very low certainty. The odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 positive users of combined hormonal contraceptives may be slightly decreased compared with those of hormonal contraceptive non-users, but the evidence is very uncertain as this is based on one study restricted to patients with BMI under 35 kg/m2. There may be little to no effect of combined hormonal contraception use on odds of intubation or mortality among COVID-19 positive patients, and little to no effect of using any type of hormonal contraception on odds of hospitalization and intubation for COVID-19 patients. We noted no large effect for risk of increased COVID-19 disease severity among hormonal contraception users. We specifically noted gaps in pertinent data collection regarding hormonal contraception use such as formulation, hormone doses, and duration or timing of contraceptive use. Differing estrogens may have different thrombogenic potential given differing potency, so it would be important to know if a formulation contained, for example, ethinyl estradiol versus estradiol valerate. Additionally, we downgraded several studies for risk of bias because information on the timing of contraceptive use relative to COVID-19 infection and method adherence were not ascertained. No studies reported indication for hormonal contraceptive use, which is important as individuals who use hormonal management for medical conditions like heavy menstrual bleeding might have different risk profiles compared to individuals using hormones for contraception. Future studies should focus on including pertinent confounders like age, obesity, history of prior venous thromboembolism, risk factors for venous thromboembolism, and recent pregnancy.

Hormonal therapies in females with blood disorders: thrombophilia, thrombosis, hemoglobinopathies, and anemias

There is widespread use of gonadal steroid hormone therapy for a variety of indications throughout the reproductive and postreproductive lifespan. These therapies may have particular benefits and specific risk among those with blood disorders, including inherited or acquired bleeding disorders, thrombophilia, thrombosis, or anemia. This clinical review is intended to provide a guidance for counseling and management of adolescent and adult biologic females with thrombophilic risk factors and/or thrombosis who require hormonal therapy. In general, synthetic estrogens present in contraceptive products should be avoided in those with a personal or strong family history of thrombosis or thrombophilias. In contrast, natural estrogens present in formulations for climacteric symptom management do not need to be avoided, and vaginal or transdermal formulations are preferred. Likewise, transdermal estradiol is preferred for gender-affirming hormone therapy and requires individualized assessment in those at high risk of thrombosis. Progestogens (either synthetic progestins or naturally occurring progesterone) can be used safely in nearly all patients. There is minimal safety evidence among anticoagulated patients at risk for thrombosis, which requires a patient-specific approach when discussing hormone therapies.

Investigating cardiovascular risk in premenopausal women on oral contraceptives: Systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

The use of oral contraceptives (OCs) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events such as arterial and venous thrombosis (VTE). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, with low- and middle-income nations accounting for over three-quarter of CVD deaths. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the link between OC use and CVD risk in premenopausal women and to further assess the role of geographic disparities in the reported prevalence of CVD risk in women on OCs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of databases such as MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition was conducted, right from the inception to the present, by using the EBSCOhost search engine. The Cochrane Central Register of Clinical trials (CENTRAL) was also searched to augment relevant sources of information. OpenGrey, which is a repository of information providing open access to bibliographical references, was searched and the reference list of the selected studies was also scanned. The potential risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3.

Results

We included 25 studies that comprised 3,245 participants, of which 1,605 (49.5%) are OC users, while 1,640 (50.5%) are non-OC users. A total of 15 studies were included for meta-analysis, and the overall pooled estimates suggested a significant increase in the traditional cardiovascular risk variables [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.73, (0.46, 0.99) (Z = 5.41, p < 0.001)] and little to no difference in endothelial activation among OC users when compared with non-OC users [SMD = -0.11, (-0.81, 0.60) (Z = 0.30, p = 0.76)]. Europe [SMD = 0.03, (-0.21, 0.27), (Z = 0.25 p = 0.88)] had the least effect size, while North America had the highest effect size [SMD = 1.86, (-0.31, 4.04), (Z = 1.68 p = 0.09)] for CVD risk in OC users when compared with non-OC users.

Conclusion

The use of OCs suggests a significant increase in the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk variables with little to no difference in the risk of endothelial dysfunction when compared with non-OC users, and the magnitude of CVD risks varies across different geographical regions.

Registration and protocol

This systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42020216169.

Prevention, Diagnostics and Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Russian Experts Consensus

The guidelines are developed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation by the all-Russian public organization «Association of Phlebologists of Russia» with participation of the Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia, the Russian Society of Surgeons, the Russian Society of Angiologists and Vascular Surgeons, the Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia, the Association of Oncologists of Russia, the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology, Russian Society of Oncohematologists, Russian Society of Cardiology, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Female Hormone Therapy and Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage From Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Female hormone therapy (oral contraception in female patients of reproductive age and menopausal hormone therapy in postmenopausal patients) is not withheld from patients with cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), although the effects of these drugs on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage are unknown. We investigated the association between female hormone therapy and intracranial hemorrhage in female patients with CCM in 2 large prospective, multicenter, observational cohort studies.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with a CCM. We compared the association between use of female hormone therapy and the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage due to the CCM during up to 5 years of prospective follow-up in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed an additional systematic review through Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception to November 2, 2021, to identify comparative studies and assess their intracranial hemorrhage incidence rate ratio according to female hormone therapy use.

RESULTS

Of 722 female patients, aged 10 years or older at time of CCM diagnosis, 137 used female hormone therapy at any point during follow-up. Female hormone therapy use (adjusted for age, mode of presentation, and CCM location) was associated with an increased risk of subsequent intracranial hemorrhage (46/137 [33.6%] vs 91/585 [15.6%] and adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.24; p = 0.015). Use of oral contraceptives in female patients aged 10-44 years adjusted for the same factors was associated with a higher risk of subsequent intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.17; p = 0.003). Our systematic literature search showed no studies reporting on the effect of female hormone therapy on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Female hormone therapy use is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage from CCMs. These findings raise questions about the safety of female hormone therapy in clinical practice in patients with CCM. Further studies evaluating clinical factors raising risk of thrombosis may be useful to determine which patients may be most susceptible to intracranial hemorrhage.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that female hormone therapy use is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CCM.

Deep venous stenting in females

Deep venous stenting has gained increasing prominence in recent years. This issue focuses on special considerations in female patients. The specific challenge relates to the fact that these patients are often much younger than those in whom arterial stents are placed. The stents have to perform adequately over potentially 60 years- and there is no data of that length available.

Pathophysiology, risk, diagnosis, and management of venous thrombosis in space: where are we now?

The recent incidental discovery of an asymptomatic venous thrombosis (VT) in the internal jugular vein of an astronaut on the International Space Station prompted a necessary, immediate response from the space medicine community. The European Space Agency formed a topical team to review the pathophysiology, risk and clinical presentation of venous thrombosis and the evaluation of its prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, and management strategies in spaceflight. In this article, we discuss the findings of the ESA VT Topical Team over its 2-year term, report the key gaps as we see them in the above areas which are hindering understanding VT in space. We provide research recommendations in a stepwise manner that build upon existing resources, and highlight the initial steps required to enable further evaluation of this newly identified pertinent medical risk.

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Following an mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Recent Oral Contraceptive Use

Rising concerns of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and other forms of venous thromboembolism have been associated with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Adverse effects with vector-based vaccines are well documented in the literature, while less is known about the mRNA vaccines. This report documents a case of CVST in a 32-year-old female patient who received her second Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccination 16 days prior to hospital admission and had started oral combined contraceptives approximately 4 months beforehand. Clinicians should be cognizant of the possibility that mRNA vaccines, when combined with other risk factors like oral contraceptive pill use, may enhance one's hypercoagulable status.

Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Following Injudicious Use of Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills

Contraceptive methods have taken various shapes since their inception and the most widely used are oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). In addition to contraception, OCPs have a variety of uses in the treatment of a number of gynaecological disorders, including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, irregular menses, menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Since they were first introduced, OCPs have been linked to a higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and stroke. We report a case where the patient irrationally took OCPs for a long period of time and presented to the emergency department in a state of altered sensorium with symptoms of vomiting and headache which are suggestive of hemorrhagic stroke.

Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception

BACKGROUND

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to significant mortality and morbidity, including a high incidence of related thrombotic events. There has been concern regarding hormonal contraception use during the COVID-19 pandemic, as this is an independent risk factor for thrombosis, particularly with estrogen-containing formulations. However, higher estrogen levels may be protective against severe COVID-19 disease. Evidence for risks of hormonal contraception use during the COVID-19 pandemic is sparse. We therefore conducted a living systematic review that will be updated as new data emerge on the risk of thromboembolism with hormonal contraception use in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if use of hormonal contraception increases risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism in women with COVID-19. To determine if use of hormonal contraception increases other markers of COVID-19 severity including hospitalization in the intensive care unit, acute respiratory distress syndrome, intubation, and mortality. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach.

SEARCH METHODS

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Global Health, and Scopus from inception to search update in March 2022. For the living systematic review, we monitored the literature monthly.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all published and ongoing studies of patients with COVID-19 comparing outcomes of those on hormonal contraception versus those not on hormonal contraception. This included case series and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted study data and this was checked by a second author. Two authors individually assessed risk of bias for the comparative studies using the ROBINS-I tool and a third author helped reconcile differences. For the living systematic review, we will publish updates to our synthesis every six months. In the event that we identify a study with a more rigorous study design than the current included evidence prior to the planned six-month update, we will expedite the synthesis publication.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three comparative NRSIs with 314,704 participants total and two case series describing 13 patients. The three NRSIs had serious to critical risk of bias in several domains and low study quality. Only one NRSI ascertained current use of contraceptives based on patient report; the other two used diagnostic codes within medical records to assess hormonal contraception use, but did not confirm current use nor indication for use. None of the NRSIs included thromboembolism as an outcome. Studies were not similar enough in terms of their outcomes, interventions, and study populations to combine with meta-analyses. We therefore narratively synthesized all included studies. Based on results from one NRSI, there may be little to no effect of combined hormonal contraception use on odds of mortality for COVID-19 positive patients (odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 2.40; 1 study, 18,892 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two NRSIs examined hospitalization rates for hormonal contraception users versus non-users. Based on results from one NRSI, the odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 positive combined hormonal contraception users may be slightly decreased compared with non-users for patients with body mass index (BMI) under 35 kg/m2 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97; 1 study, 295,689 participants; very low-certainty evidence). According to results of the other NRSI assessing use of any type of hormonal contraception, there may be little to no effect on hospitalization rates for COVID-19 positive individuals (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.44; 1 study, 123 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We included two case series because no comparative studies directly assessed thromboembolism as an outcome. In a case series of six pediatric COVID-19 positive patients with pulmonary embolism, one (older than 15 years of age) was using combined hormonal contraception. In a second case series of seven COVID-19 positive patients with cerebral venous thrombosis, one was using oral contraceptives. One comparative study and one case series reported on intubation rates, but the evidence for both is very uncertain. In the comparative study of 123 COVID-19 positive patients (N = 44 using hormonal contraception and N = 79 not using hormonal contraception), no patients in either group required intubation. In the case series of seven individuals with cerebral venous thromboembolism, one oral contraceptive user and one non-user required intubation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no comparative studies assessing risk of thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients who use hormonal contraception, which was the primary objective of this review. Very little evidence exists examining the risk of increased COVID-19 disease severity for combined hormonal contraception users compared to non-users of hormonal contraception, and the evidence that does exist is of very low certainty. The odds of hospitalization for COVID-19 positive users of combined hormonal contraceptives may be slightly decreased compared with those of hormonal contraceptive non-users, but the evidence is very uncertain as this is based on one study restricted to patients with BMI under 35 kg/m2. There may be little to no effect of combined hormonal contraception use on odds of intubation or mortality among COVID-19 positive patients, and little to no effect of using any type of hormonal contraception on odds of hospitalization and intubation for COVID-19 patients. At a minimum, we noted no large effect for risk of increased COVID-19 disease severity among hormonal contraception users. We specifically noted gaps in pertinent data collection regarding hormonal contraception use such as formulation, hormone doses, and duration or timing of contraceptive use. Differing estrogens may have different thrombogenic potential given differing potency, so it would be important to know if a formulation contained, for example, ethinyl estradiol versus estradiol valerate. Additionally, we downgraded several studies for risk of bias because information on the timing of contraceptive use relative to COVID-19 infection and method adherence were not ascertained. No studies reported indication for hormonal contraceptive use, which is important as individuals who use hormonal management for medical conditions like heavy menstrual bleeding might have different risk profiles compared to individuals using hormones for contraception. Future studies should focus on including pertinent confounders like age, obesity, history of prior venous thromboembolism, risk factors for venous thromboembolism, and recent pregnancy.

Evaluation of Activated Protein C Resistance Using Thrombin Generation Test

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) has been identified as a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A mutation at the level of factor (F) V has at first permitted the description of this phenotypic pattern and corresponded to a transition (guanine to adenine) at nucleotide 1691 in the gene coding for factor V, resulting in the replacement of arginine at position 506 by a glutamine. This confers to this mutated FV a resistance toward the proteolytic action of the complex formed by activated protein C with protein S. However, many other factors also lead to APCR, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy, and postpartum. All these conditions lead to the phenotypic expression of APCR and are associated with an increased risk of VTE. Considering the large population affected, the proper detection of this phenotype is a public health challenge. Currently, two types of tests are available: clotting time-based assays and their multiple variants and a thrombin generation-based assays and the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based APCR assay. As APCR was thought to be uniquely related to the FV Leiden mutation, clotting time-based assays were specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Nevertheless, other APCR conditions have been reported but were not captured by these clotting methods. Thus, the ETP-based APCR assay has been proposed as a global coagulation test able to these multiple APCR conditions, as it provides much more information, which makes it a potential candidate for screening coagulopathic conditions before therapeutic interventions. This chapter will describe the current method used for the realization of the ETP-based APC resistance assay.

Pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials evaluating the effects of a novel combined oral contraceptive containing estetrol/drospirenone on bleeding patterns in healthy women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the bleeding patterns of a new combined oral contraceptive containing estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg in a 24/4-day regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

We pooled bleeding data from two parallel, open-label, 13-cycle phase 3 trials that enrolled participants 16 to 50 years old with body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m². Participants reported vaginal bleeding/spotting in daily diaries. For this bleeding analysis, we included participants with at least one evaluable cycle. We calculated mean frequencies of scheduled and unscheduled bleeding/spotting episodes and median duration of bleeding/spotting episodes, and assessed associations between treatment compliance, BMI and recent hormonal contraceptive use on bleeding/spotting outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 3409 participants with 33,815 cycles. Scheduled bleeding/spotting occurred in 87.2% to 90.4% of participants/cycle, with a median duration of 4 to 5 days. Unscheduled bleeding/spotting decreased from 27.1% in Cycle 1 to 20.6% in Cycle 2 to ≤17.5% from Cycle 5 onwards. Most (66.5%) unscheduled bleeding/spotting episodes were spotting-only. Between 5.8% and 7.8% of users/cycle experienced absence of any scheduled or unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Missing one or more active pills resulted in a higher occurrence of unscheduled bleeding/spotting (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval 1.68-2.70]) and absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 2.36 [1.82-3.07]). Participants with a BMI ≥30 kg/m² reported more absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 1.68 [1.37-2.05]). Switchers and starters reported similar frequencies of unscheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 0.94 [0.83-1.07]) and absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 1.00 [0.85-1.19]). Three percent of participants discontinued for a bleeding-related adverse event.

CONCLUSION

E4/DRSP use results in a predictable bleeding pattern with limited unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Noncompliance and BMI affect bleeding patterns.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Most estetrol/drospirenone users experience a predictable and regular bleeding pattern. Providers can educate patients about the expected bleeding patterns and should advise users that they may infrequently experience no scheduled bleeding/spotting. This information may improve user acceptability and continuation of this new oral contraceptive.

Perspective Chapter: Modern Birth Control Methods

This chapter focuses on various modern birth control methods, including combined oral contraceptives, progestogen-only pills, progestogen-only injectables, progestogen-only implants, intrauterine devices, barrier contraceptives, and emergency contraceptive pills. Each contraceptive method is covered in detail, including mechanism of action, effectiveness, health benefits, advantages, disadvantages, risks, and side-effects.

Hormonal therapies and venous thrombosis: Considerations for prevention and management

Background

Venous thromboses are well-established complications of hormonal therapy. Thrombosis risk is seen with both hormonal contraceptive agents and with hormone replacement therapy for menopause and gender transition. Over the past several decades, large epidemiological studies have helped better define these risks.

Objectives

To review and discuss the differences in thrombosis risk of the many of hormonal preparations available as well as their interaction with patient-specific factors.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the available literature regarding venous thrombosis and hormonal therapies including for contraception, menopausal symptoms, and gender transition.

Results

Thrombosis risk with estrogen-containing compounds increases with increasing systemic dose of estrogen. While progesterone-only-containing products are not associated with thrombosis, when paired with estrogen in combined oral contraceptives, the formulation of progesterone does impact the risk. These components, along with patient-specific factors, may influence the choice of hormonal preparation. For patients who develop thrombosis on hormonal treatment, anticoagulation is protective against future thrombosis. Duration of anticoagulation is dependent on ongoing and future hormone therapy choice. Finally, the optimal management of hormone therapy for individuals diagnosed with prothrombotic illnesses such as COVID-19 remains unclear.

Conclusions

When contemplating hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy, clinicians must consider a variety of factors including hormone type, dose, route, personal and family history of thrombosis, and other prothrombotic risk factors to make informed, personalized decisions regarding the risk of venous thrombosis.

Combined Oral Contraceptives and Vascular Thrombosis: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are frequently prescribed for contraception, to regulate ovulation and treat endometriosis, and to control menopausal symptoms. A major risk of hormonal contraceptives is vascular thrombosis.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of female patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or other sites of thrombosis or emboli seen in the thrombosis clinic of the department of internal medicine at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia between March 2010 and February 2015 was performed to identify and characterize which women were taking COCs.

Results

Of 1,008 patients treated for DVT, PE, or other sites of thrombosis or emboli, 100 (9.9%) were taking COCs. Venous (98%) and arterial (2%) thromboses were seen. Overall, 62% of the patients experienced a DVT and 26% pulmonary emboli, and 20% of the patients experienced unusual sites of thrombosis. Furthermore, 53% were obese or morbidly obese. The incidence of venous thrombosis was the highest during the first year of COC use (73%). Of the patients, 8% had thrombophilia.

Conclusion

This study characterizes Saudi women with thrombotic events taking COCs and identifies risk factors, including unusual sites of thrombosis. Most patients experienced the vascular event during the first year of taking COCs. Age of 40-50 years, obesity, and thrombophilia were the commonly observed risk factors.

Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is excessive menstrual blood loss that interferes with women's quality of life, regardless of the absolute amount of bleeding. It is a very common condition in women of reproductive age, affecting 2 to 5 of every 10 women. Diverse treatments, either medical (hormonal or non-hormonal) or surgical, are currently available for HMB, with different effectiveness, acceptability, costs and side effects. The best treatment will depend on the woman's age, her intention to become pregnant, the presence of other symptoms, and her personal views and preferences.

OBJECTIVES

To identify, systematically assess and summarise all evidence from studies included in Cochrane Reviews on treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), using reviews with comparable participants and outcomes; and to present a ranking of the first- and second-line treatments for HMB.

METHODS

We searched for published Cochrane Reviews of HMB interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The primary outcomes were menstrual bleeding and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, adverse events and the requirement of further treatment. Two review authors independently selected the systematic reviews, extracted data and assessed quality, resolving disagreements by discussion. We assessed review quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool and evaluated the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using GRADE methods. We grouped the interventions into first- and second-line treatments, considering participant characteristics (desire for future pregnancy, failure of previous treatment, candidacy for surgery). First-line treatments included medical interventions, and second-line treatments included both the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and surgical treatments; thus the LNG-IUS is included in both groups. We developed different networks for first- and second-line treatments. We performed network meta-analyses of all outcomes, except for quality of life, where we performed pairwise meta-analyses. We reported the mean rank, the network estimates for mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the certainty of evidence (moderate, low or very low certainty). We also analysed different endometrial ablation and resection techniques separately from the main network: transcervical endometrial resection (TCRE) with or without rollerball, other resectoscopic endometrial ablation (REA), microwave non-resectoscopic endometrial ablation (NREA), hydrothermal ablation NREA, bipolar NREA, balloon NREA and other NREA.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library up to July 2021. We updated the reviews that were over two years old. In July 2020, we started the overview with no new reviews about the topic. The included medical interventions were: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid), combined oral contraceptives (COC), combined vaginal ring (CVR), long-cycle and luteal oral progestogens, LNG-IUS, ethamsylate and danazol (included to provide indirect evidence), which were compared to placebo. Surgical interventions were: open (abdominal), minimally invasive (vaginal or laparoscopic) and unspecified (or surgeon's choice of route of) hysterectomy, REA, NREA, unspecified endometrial ablation (EA) and LNG-IUS. We grouped the interventions as follows. First-line treatments Evidence from 26 studies with 1770 participants suggests that LNG-IUS results in a large reduction of menstrual blood loss (MBL; mean rank 2.4, MD -105.71 mL/cycle, 95% CI -201.10 to -10.33; low certainty evidence); antifibrinolytics probably reduce MBL (mean rank 3.7, MD -80.32 mL/cycle, 95% CI -127.67 to -32.98; moderate certainty evidence); long-cycle progestogen reduces MBL (mean rank 4.1, MD -76.93 mL/cycle, 95% CI -153.82 to -0.05; low certainty evidence), and NSAIDs slightly reduce MBL (mean rank 6.4, MD -40.67 mL/cycle, -84.61 to 3.27; low certainty evidence; reference comparator mean rank 8.9). We are uncertain of the true effect of the remaining interventions and the sensitivity analysis for reduction of MBL, as the evidence was rated as very low certainty. We are uncertain of the true effect of any intervention (very low certainty evidence) on the perception of improvement and satisfaction. Second-line treatments Bleeding reduction is related to the type of hysterectomy (total or supracervical/subtotal), not the route, so we combined all routes of hysterectomy for bleeding outcomes. We assessed the reduction of MBL without imputed data (11 trials, 1790 participants) and with imputed data (15 trials, 2241 participants). Evidence without imputed data suggests that hysterectomy (mean rank 1.2, OR 25.71, 95% CI 1.50 to 439.96; low certainty evidence) and REA (mean rank 2.8, OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.66; low certainty evidence) result in a large reduction of MBL, and NREA probably results in a large reduction of MBL (mean rank 2.0, OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.53 to 7.23; moderate certainty evidence). Evidence with imputed data suggests hysterectomy results in a large reduction of MBL (mean rank 1.0, OR 14.31, 95% CI 2.99 to 68.56; low certainty evidence), and NREA probably results in a large reduction of MBL (mean rank 2.2, OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.05; moderate certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the true effect for REA (very low certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect on amenorrhoea (very low certainty evidence). Evidence from 27 trials with 4284 participants suggests that minimally invasive hysterectomy results in a large increase in satisfaction (mean rank 1.3, OR 7.96, 95% CI 3.33 to 19.03; low certainty evidence), and NREA also increases satisfaction (mean rank 3.6, OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.33; low certainty evidence), but we are uncertain of the true effect of the remaining interventions (very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests LNG-IUS is the best first-line treatment for reducing menstrual blood loss (MBL); antifibrinolytics are probably the second best, and long-cycle progestogens are likely the third best. We cannot make conclusions about the effect of first-line treatments on perception of improvement and satisfaction, as evidence was rated as very low certainty. For second-line treatments, evidence suggests hysterectomy is the best treatment for reducing bleeding, followed by REA and NREA. We are uncertain of the effect on amenorrhoea, as evidence was rated as very low certainty. Minimally invasive hysterectomy may result in a large increase in satisfaction, and NREA also increases satisfaction, but we are uncertain of the true effect of the remaining second-line interventions, as evidence was rated as very low certainty.

Hormonelle Kontrazeption und Thrombose

Hormonelle Kontrazeption und Thromboembolie-Risiko Kombinierte hormonelle Kontrazeptiva (KK) erhöhen das VTE-Risiko signifikant. Gestagen-Monopräparate sind mit Ausnahme der 3-Monatsspritze nicht mit einem erhöhten VTE-Risiko assoziiert und können bei Frauen mit vorausgegangener VTE oder thrombophilen Risikofaktoren mit Wunsch nach hormoneller Verhütung angewandt werden.

Individuelle Risikofaktoren und hormonelle Kontrazeption Vor der Verschreibung einer hormonellen Kontrazeption soll eine sorgfältige Erhebung des VTE-Risikos erfolgen. Eine entsprechende Checkliste findet sich auf der Internetseite des BfArM. Eine routinemäßige Testung auf hereditäre Thrombophilie wird nicht empfohlen.

Kontrazeption unter Antikoagulation Orale Antikoagulanzien sind plazentagängig und prinzipiell embryotoxisch und erfordern somit die Anwendung einer sicheren Empfängnisverhütung. Eine häufige Nebenwirkung unter oraler Antikoagulanzientherapie ist das Auftreten einer Hypermenorrhö. Die hormonelle Kontrazeption kann bei bestehender Antikoagulation auch mit einem Kombinationspräparat fortgeführt werden, sofern spätestens 6 Wochen vor Beendigung der Antikoagulation die Umstellung auf eine östrogenfreie Form der Kontrazeption erfolgt.

Hormonassoziierte VTE und Rezidivrisiko VTE, die bei Frauen unter Verwendung von hormonellen Kontrazeptiva aufgetreten sind, gelten als provozierte Ereignisse. Das Rezidivrisiko einer hormonassoziierten VTE ist nach Absetzen der Antikoagulation und Umstellung auf eine östrogenfreie Form der Kontrazeption gering, sodass eine Antikoagulationsdauer von 3–6 Monaten in der Regel ausreichend ist. Nach hormonassoziierter VTE wird während einer künftigen Schwangerschaft und im Wochenbett eine medikamentöse VTE-Prophylaxe empfohlen.

Thromboembolism and Oral Contraceptives During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Disproportionality Analysis Within the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database

Background

Thromboembolic events (TEs) are known to be a severe complication for COVID-19. They are associated with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with coagulation cascade activation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine a potential association between the COVID-19 pandemic and the increment of the risk of suspected TEs in women on systemic hormonal contraceptives (SHCs).

Patients and Methods

This study utilised a case/non-case approach in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database, which includes more than 290,000 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated during an initial pandemic period in 2020 compared with a pre-pandemic period in 2019 and an additional control period in 2018.

Results

While there was a decreased number of ADR notifications for any medications and for any type of ADR in patients on SHCs during the pandemic period, the TE ROR for all SHCs was higher in the 2020 pandemic period [ROR = 11.8 (5.6–24.7)] relative to the pre-pandemic period in 2019 [ROR = 6.3 (3.2–12.5)] and the additional control period in 2018 [ROR = 4.6. (2.1–9.9)]. In contrast, ROR for progestogen-only contraceptives was lower during the pandemic as compared with the two control periods.

Conclusion

The reported disproportionality of TEs in women on SHCs rose during the pandemic period. This suggests a potential interaction of the drug (SHC) with COVID-19, which led to an increased risk of TEs in women exposed to both factors. This should be taken into consideration in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Contraception for Adolescents and Young Women with Type 2 Diabetes-Specific Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews how to address contraception in young women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The presence of obesity and comorbidities associated with insulin resistance increases the risk of thromboembolic disease and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that adolescents with T2D are at high risk of unintended pregnancy with poor outcomes for the mother and offspring. Adolescents with T2D without severe obesity, micro- or macrovascular disease, or other cardiovascular risk factors can use any contraceptive method. However, only nonhormonal or progestin-only methods may be used when morbid obesity, severe hypertension, micro- or macrovascular disease, or multiple cardiovascular risk factors are present. The medical team must provide preconceptional counseling and contraception to reduce adolescent pregnancies in young women with T2D. Progestin-only or nonhormonal long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) should be recommended for women with T2D with compliance issues or adverse cardiovascular risk profiles.

Association between past oral contraceptive use and the prevalence of hypertension in postmenopausal women: the fifth (2010-2012) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V)

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence as to whether the use of oral contraceptives(OC) during the fertile years affects the development of postmenopausal hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate the association between past use of OC and development of hypertension in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted using data from the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of postmenopausal women. Subjects were classified into three groups based on past OC use duration: nonusers, short-term users(0-30 months), and long-term users(≥ 30 months). We evaluated the development of hypertension in women after menopause. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the association between the use of OC during the fertile years and the prevalence of hypertension after menopause following adjustment for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 3,386 postmenopausal women, 2,713 were nonusers of OC, 489 were short-term users, and 184 were long-term users. Women who had used OC for 30 months or more had a significantly greater prevalence of hypertension after menopause than those who had never taken OC. The association between taking OC for 30 months or more during the fertile years and the prevalence of hypertension after menopause was significant following adjustment for potential confounding factors (adjusted OR:1.75; 95%CI:1.12-2.74).

CONCLUSION

This study identified an association between past OC use and an increased prevalence of hypertension in postmenopausal women. Our results suggest that long-term use of OC during the fertile years can be an important risk factor for subsequent hypertension after menopause.

Should Combined Hormonal Contraception Be Stopped in the Perioperative Period?

Should Combined Hormonal Contraception Be Stopped in the Perioperative Period?A 34-year-old woman is scheduled to undergo surgery to manage a torn anterior cruciate ligament in her left knee. Her only medication is an estrogen- and progestin-containing oral contraceptive pill (OCP). Should she stop her combined oral contraception to reduce the risk of a postoperative blood clot?

Combined Oral Contraceptives and Venous Thromboembolism: Review and Perspective to Mitigate the Risk

Many factors must be considered and discussed with women when initiating a contraceptive method and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of them. In this review, we discuss the numerous strategies that have been implemented to reduce the thrombotic risk associated with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) from their arrival on the market until today. Evidences suggesting that COCs were associated with an increased risk of VTE appeared rapidly after their marketing. Identified as the main contributor of this risk, the dosage of the estrogen, i.e., ethinylestradiol (EE), was significantly reduced. New progestins were also synthetized (e.g., desogestrel or gestodene) but their weak androgenic activity did not permit to counterbalance the effect of EE as did the initial progestins such as levonorgestrel. Numerous studies assessed the impact of estroprogestative combinations on hemostasis and demonstrated that women under COC suffered from resistance towards activated protein C (APC). Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency updated its guidelines on clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in which they recommended to assess this biological marker. In 2009, estradiol-containing COCs were marketed and the use of this natural form of estrogen was found to exert a weaker effect on the synthesis of hepatic proteins compared to EE. In this year 2021, a novel COC based on a native estrogen, i.e., estetrol, will be introduced on the market. Associated with drospirenone, this preparation demonstrated minor effects on coagulation proteins as compared with other drospirenone-containing COCs. At the present time, the standard of care when starting a contraception, consists of identifying the presence of hereditary thrombophilia solely on the basis of familial history of VTE. This strategy has however been reported as poorly predictive of hereditary thrombophilia. One rationale and affordable perspective which has already been considered in the past could be the implementation of a baseline screening of the prothrombotic state to provide health care professionals with objective data to support the prescription of the more appropriate contraceptive method. While this strategy was judged too expensive due to limited laboratory solutions, the endogenous thrombin potential-based APC resistance assay could now represent an interesting alternative.

An endocrine perspective on menstrual suppression for adolescents: achieving good suppression while optimizing bone health

Suppression of menstruation and/or ovarian function in adolescent girls may be desired for a variety of reasons. Numerous medical options exist. The choice of the appropriate modality for an individual patient depends on several factors based on differences in the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression as well as in their side effect profiles. Adolescence is also a period of bone mass accrual in girls, and several of these modalities may negatively influence peak bone mass. This review focuses on the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression and the effect on bone health of the various options through an overview of the current literature and also highlights areas in need of further research.

Successful Treatment of Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia in a 26-Year-Old Female Patient

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has already been described after vaccination with ChAdOx2 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson &amp; Johnson/Janssen). However, less knowledge so far has been gained about optimal therapeutic regimens in VITT-suspected patients. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old female patient, who developed bilateral deep vein thrombosis in the lower legs and severe thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx2 nCov-19 vaccination. After initial anticoagulation therapy regimens including fondaparinux, apixaban, and danaparoid failed, the patient was successfully treated with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in combination with parental anticoagulation therapy with argatroban. As vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 affects billions of people worldwide, medical facilities and hospitals have to be prepared and provide effective treatment options in VITT-suspected patients, including rapid application of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins, to improve patient outcomes.

Möglichkeiten der Kontrazeption bei Übergewicht und Adipositas

Die weltweit steigende Prävalenz von Übergewicht und Adipositas betrifft zunehmend Frauen im fertilen Alter. Ungewollte oder ungeplante Schwangerschaften treten bei Frauen mit Übergewicht häufiger auf, was sowohl auf die mangelnde Anwendung einer effektiven Kontrazeption als auch auf die pathophysiologischen Besonderheiten, die mit einem erhöhten Körperfettanteil einhergehen, zurückzuführen ist. Eine adäquate Kontrazeptionsberatung adipöser Frauen ist daher essenziell für ihre Gesundheit und Lebensqualität. Unter den kombinierten Kontrazeptiva stellen orale Präparate, die Ethinylestradiol und Levonorgestrel (LNG) enthalten, eine effiziente Option dar, vorausgesetzt, es bestehen zusätzlich zum erhöhten Body-Mass-Index (BMI) keine weiteren Risikofaktoren für kardiovaskuläre oder thrombembolische Ereignisse. Rein gestagene Präparate zeichnen sich durch ihre geringen gesundheitlichen Risiken aus. Die Angst vor einer weiteren Gewichtszunahme ist ein häufiger Grund für das Sistieren der Einnahme, wobei dieser Zusammenhang außer für Depot-Medoxyprogesteronacetat für die meisten Präparate wissenschaftlich nicht belegt wurde. Die Wirksamkeit intrauteriner Kontrazeptiva entfaltet sich unabhängig vom Körpergewicht. Als Notfallkontrazeption ist die Einlage eines kupferhaltigen Intrauterinpessars die sicherste Methode, jedoch erheblich aufwendiger und teurer als eine orale Notfallkontrazeption. Die orale Einnahme von Ulipristalacetat 30 mg ist aufgrund der potenteren Ovulationshemmung und der stärkeren Reduktion unerwünschter Schwangerschaften gegenüber LNG 1,5 mg zu bevorzugen.

An oral combined contraceptive user with elevated D-dimer post COVID-19: a case report

BACKGROUND

This case discusses the challenges created by COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) in the area of hormonal contraception, highlighting the contraception knowledge gap for women in their post COVID-19 period, especially if they had high D-dimer levels.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case involves a thirty-eight-year-old woman taking combined oral contraception (desogestrel/ethinyl oestradiol tablets) with a history of varicose veins. She recovered from a COVID-19 infection in November 2020. She presented to the emergency room with right lower-limb pain below the knee and progressive swelling for five days in February 2021. Physical examination of the lower limb showed mild swelling and tenderness of the right leg compared to the left leg. D-Dimer was elevated (1.06 mcg/mL FEU). COVID-19 screening was negative. A Doppler scan to exclude DVT was performed considering the clinical picture and high D-dimer level. There was no evidence of DVT in the right limb. She was reassured and discharged with instructions on when to visit the emergency room. The D-dimer had decreased to 0.53 mcg/mL FEU in March 2021. She booked an appointment with family medicine clinics because she was concerned about the continuation of combined oral contraception (desogestrel/ethinyl oestradiol tablets) with high D-dimer and risk of thrombosis. The follow-up D-dimer level in May 2021 was normal (0.4 mcg/mL FEU). The patient preferred to continue taking oral contraception.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-based consensus is needed to guide clinicians in providing contraception counselling for such patients.

Venous thromboembolism associated with combined oral contraceptive use: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are used for various reasons. However, venous thromboembolism (VTE), a significant side effect, can be fatal. This study reports the first case series in Korea involving patients with COC-associated VTE registered at a university hospital.

METHODS

This study recruited 13 patients diagnosed with COC-associated VTE between June 2006 and May 2018. Risk factors, including age, body mass index, smoking habits, estrogen dosage, type of progestin, and duration of COC use, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among patients with VTE, 9 showed pulmonary embolism (PE) concomitant with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the remaining patients showed DVT (1 patient), PE (1 patient), and cerebral venous thrombosis (2 patients). The median duration between the onset of symptoms and a hospital visit was 3 days, and it sometimes took as long as 32 days. Among the 10 patients with PE, 1 high-risk group and 2 intermediate-high risk groups were treated with tissue plasminogen activators before anticoagulants. There were no cases of recurrence among patients who continued to take anticoagulants for 3 months.

CONCLUSION

These findings emphasize that healthcare professionals who prescribe or dispense COCs to women must inform them of the risk of VTE, including the risk factors, differences in risk depending on the type of progestin present in the product, and pertinent signs and symptoms. Efforts should also be made to inform patients of VTE, even through information campaigns such as brochures. Most importantly, women should remain alert for signs and symptoms of VTE when using COCs.

Trends in the use of hormonal contraception in Estonia 2005-2019 and the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To describe trends in hormonal contraceptive use, incidence of thromboembolism and presence of risk factors for thromboembolism among the users in Estonia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of 223 312 female patients aged 15-49 years in 2005-2019 from national health insurance databases was derived. Annual prevalence rates of hormonal contraceptive users, incidence rates of thromboembolism and prevalence rates of risk factors were calculated.

RESULTS

Between 2005-2019 usage of progestogen-only contraceptives (POCs) increased steadily (from 24 to 135 users per 1000 population), whereas combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) use declined (from 209 in 2012 to 161 users per 1000 population in 2019). During the study period, 390 cases of venous thromboembolism and 108 arterial thromboembolism coincided with hormonal contraceptive use. Incidence rate for venous thromboembolism was 5.0 (95% CI 4.5-5.5) and for arterial thromboembolism 1.4 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI 1.1-1.7) among hormonal contraceptive users. Age adjusted incidence of venous thromboembolism among CHC users was 5.8 (95% CI 4.1-8.2) times higher than in POC users. Among CHC users, 10.3% had more than one risk factor for thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In regards to the risk of thromboembolism, wider use of POCs and declining prevalence of CHCs in Estonia is positive trend. Still, women with history of thrombosis receiving CHC is a serious concern.

[Hormonal contraception and venous thromboembolism]

The use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE risk depends on the specific combination of oestrogen and gestagen components. Progestin-only contraceptives with the exception of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are not associated with a significant VTE risk and can therefore be offered to women with known thrombophilia or a prior VTE. The recent German S3 guideline "Contraception" advises to carefully assess individual VTE risk factors before prescribing CHC. According to recent data there is no evidence suggesting that VTE risk is increased during oral anticoagulation. To reduce the risk of vaginal bleeding complication and the risk of unplanned pregnancy, the use of CHC can be continued under anticoagulation treatment provided that the patient is switched to an oestrogen-free contraception no later than six weeks before the end of anticoagulation. The risk of recurrence is low in women with hormone-associated VTE. Anticoagulation is therefore in general discontinued after 3-6 months. Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular heparin is recommended for women with prior hormone-associated VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period.